Bruce Willis Height
5ft 11 ½ (181.6 cm)
American Actor best known for roles in the Die Hard films, Armageddon, Pulp Fiction, The Sixth Sense, Unbreakable, The Last Boy Scout, The Fifth Element, 12 Monkeys, Looper and RED. On Bruce's Official Site he used to have his height listed as "6'1", although on The Dave Letterman Show said 6 foot.
Halle Berry and Bruce
Photo by PR Photos
Photo by PR Photos
You May Be Interested
John Travolta
5ft 11 (180 cm)
5ft 11 (180 cm)
Jason Statham
5ft 8 ¾ (175 cm)
5ft 8 ¾ (175 cm)
Nicolas Cage
6ft 0 (183 cm)
6ft 0 (183 cm)
Dolph Lundgren
6ft 2 ½ (189 cm)
6ft 2 ½ (189 cm)
Add a Comment2961 comments
Average Guess (239 Votes)
5ft 11.32in (181.1cm)
5ft 11.32in (181.1cm)
Precision Man said on 23/Sep/24
Wow again! Even more misinformation! Bruce Willis is NOT 6'0, nor has he ever been such! He is at best 5'10!
Wow again! Even more misinformation! Bruce Willis is NOT 6'0, nor has he ever been such! He is at best 5'10!
5'7 and a fraction said on 20/Sep/23
@Rob, is a current height really necessary for him anymore, considering how he's retired due to complications with dementia?
Editor Rob
@Rob, is a current height really necessary for him anymore, considering how he's retired due to complications with dementia?
Editor RobYeah it might be best putting him back to peak.
Sandy Cowell said on 1/Apr/23
I’m watching Bruce playing Butch the Boxer in Pulp Fiction, and I’m wondering whether there are any families out there who have heirlooms which have been carried around in a member’s @rse for any length of time!
5ft11.25 peak and 5ft11 now. ⏱😂👌🏼🍑🤣
I saw him in M Night Shyamalan’s The Sixth Sense the other day. He doesn’t look visibly shorter today.
I’m watching Bruce playing Butch the Boxer in Pulp Fiction, and I’m wondering whether there are any families out there who have heirlooms which have been carried around in a member’s @rse for any length of time!
5ft11.25 peak and 5ft11 now. ⏱😂👌🏼🍑🤣
I saw him in M Night Shyamalan’s The Sixth Sense the other day. He doesn’t look visibly shorter today.
QM6'1.5"QM said on 20/Jan/23
He was already 5'11" in "Pulp fiction" (1994).
He was already 5'11" in "Pulp fiction" (1994).
Griffith said on 26/Dec/22
Rob, do you reckon Bruce would measure 6ft first thing in the morning in his hay days??
Editor Rob
Rob, do you reckon Bruce would measure 6ft first thing in the morning in his hay days??
Editor RobYes, I can't see him being anything under 6ft early in the day.
Meltdown said on 9/Oct/22
Bruce Willis is in his late 60s and only lost a half inch? A modern marvel.
Bruce Willis is in his late 60s and only lost a half inch? A modern marvel.
Sandy Cowell said on 29/Sep/22
How awful to hear that this hard working actor has brain disease.
I’ll remember him in my prayers.
How awful to hear that this hard working actor has brain disease.
I’ll remember him in my prayers.
Sandy Cowell said on 29/Sep/22
Wasn’t Bruce terrific in ‘The Sixth Sense’, and ‘Armageddon’ for that matter?
5ft11 today and half-an-inch more for his peak.
Wasn’t Bruce terrific in ‘The Sixth Sense’, and ‘Armageddon’ for that matter?
5ft11 today and half-an-inch more for his peak.
Arch Stanton said on 29/Sep/22
The 80s is now like the 60s when I was a kid to anybody in their teens and twenties, the "old days" LOL. I still don't think of the 80s and 90s as "old".. Very sad that he has a brain disease. 67 years old, might have lost near an inch now.
The 80s is now like the 60s when I was a kid to anybody in their teens and twenties, the "old days" LOL. I still don't think of the 80s and 90s as "old".. Very sad that he has a brain disease. 67 years old, might have lost near an inch now.
berta said on 27/Sep/22
Sad to hear he got a brain disease. He made some very good movies in the old days. Peak anywhere from 181-182,5 is possible. Today anywhere from 179,5-181. I think he was 181,4 ish and today 180.
Sad to hear he got a brain disease. He made some very good movies in the old days. Peak anywhere from 181-182,5 is possible. Today anywhere from 179,5-181. I think he was 181,4 ish and today 180.
Bravo1 said on 31/Aug/22
5’11” peak, 5’10” now.
5’11” peak, 5’10” now.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Aug/22
I think he's still roughly 5ft11
I think he's still roughly 5ft11
Spidey said on 19/Jul/22
Rob, could Bruce Willis be only 179cm today?
Editor Rob
Rob, could Bruce Willis be only 179cm today?
Editor RobBy this point, I wouldn't rule out strong 179cm
SeanR said on 20/Jun/22
Hi Rob,
Please add Emma Heming to this site, she is at least 5’10 1/2” next to Bruce here: Click Here
Hi Rob,
Please add Emma Heming to this site, she is at least 5’10 1/2” next to Bruce here: Click Here
Andy Cash said on 15/Jun/22
At 5 11 which I believe he is, he is the perfect height. Many men are 5v11 but claim to be 6 ft. He may even be 5 10.5 but he carries himself well and dominants any film scene such that you see him bigger. One of the best actors of the last 30 years. Peaked with Pulp Fiction but loved him in moonlighting.
At 5 11 which I believe he is, he is the perfect height. Many men are 5v11 but claim to be 6 ft. He may even be 5 10.5 but he carries himself well and dominants any film scene such that you see him bigger. One of the best actors of the last 30 years. Peaked with Pulp Fiction but loved him in moonlighting.
Rising174cm said on 30/Apr/22
Bruce was given a half inch height loss here as far back as 2008 and he did seem 5'11" flat as far back as 2007 with Justin Long and Timothy Olyphant during Live Free or Die Hard. I sometimes wonder how much over 5'11" he ever was because he didn't seem to shrink much more after early 50s, but he did really look 5'11.5" on Miami Vice.
Bruce was given a half inch height loss here as far back as 2008 and he did seem 5'11" flat as far back as 2007 with Justin Long and Timothy Olyphant during Live Free or Die Hard. I sometimes wonder how much over 5'11" he ever was because he didn't seem to shrink much more after early 50s, but he did really look 5'11.5" on Miami Vice.
viper said on 2/Apr/22
Half an inch is quite a bit at his age
Half an inch is quite a bit at his age
Rapha said on 4/Feb/22
For someone being 66 years old, he has not shrunk much.
For someone being 66 years old, he has not shrunk much.
Wehrmacht180 said on 4/Jan/22
180 cm
180 cm
AverageSlovene said on 1/Jan/22
Him claiming 6 feet isn’t really inflating, it is probably his morning height. He is no Sly (or his “six one” brother Frank) when it comes to height claims, I personally think peak Bruce would edge out Vin (i just posted a comment on his page too). Looked a good inch shorter than Alan Rickman (who i think truly is the 6’0.75 he is listed at).
Him claiming 6 feet isn’t really inflating, it is probably his morning height. He is no Sly (or his “six one” brother Frank) when it comes to height claims, I personally think peak Bruce would edge out Vin (i just posted a comment on his page too). Looked a good inch shorter than Alan Rickman (who i think truly is the 6’0.75 he is listed at).
Rising174cm said on 22/Dec/21
By the time Bruce was seen with 5'11.75" listed Timothy Olyphant, he was likely no longer his peak height. 2007 was when Rob first gave him a current height of 5'11", iirc, and it's partially because of how he looked promoting Live Free or Die Hard, particularly with 5'9" listed Justin Long. Click Here Click Here Long appears to be a bit closer to the camera and Bruce looks to be bending one knee in the second pic, but Long is wearing Converse so there's really no way Bruce appears over 5'11" with him. Long isn't wearing Converse here and again appears closer with a bigger heel than Bruce's shoes, but Bruce again seemed to be 5'11" max with him: Click Here Click Here
A half inch loss by early 50s is not much of a stretch, but it's odd because I agree that he still pulled off 5'11" at least into his 60s. So losing a half inch by early 50s and then nothing more or nothing else noticeable for the 10-15 years after that is what seems odd to me. Bruce was pretty much identical to 5'11" listed Mickey Rourke in full pics and video from the 2010 Expendables premiere, which confirms he was roughly 5'11" flat between 50-55. But as of 2018, 5'10.75" was still the absolute lowest I'd guess Bruce at age 63. He did still edge 5'10.5" Stephen Colbert in 2015 as well.
But there's also the comparison to 5'11.25" listed Matthew Perry from about 2000 and it's doubtful Bruce would have lost much by then.
I do acknowledge he could look taller, such as when he appeared on Miami Vice. I haven't seen all of Armageddon since it was in theaters, but everything I have seen suggests he looked taller in that as well.
By the time Bruce was seen with 5'11.75" listed Timothy Olyphant, he was likely no longer his peak height. 2007 was when Rob first gave him a current height of 5'11", iirc, and it's partially because of how he looked promoting Live Free or Die Hard, particularly with 5'9" listed Justin Long. Click Here Click Here Long appears to be a bit closer to the camera and Bruce looks to be bending one knee in the second pic, but Long is wearing Converse so there's really no way Bruce appears over 5'11" with him. Long isn't wearing Converse here and again appears closer with a bigger heel than Bruce's shoes, but Bruce again seemed to be 5'11" max with him: Click Here Click Here
A half inch loss by early 50s is not much of a stretch, but it's odd because I agree that he still pulled off 5'11" at least into his 60s. So losing a half inch by early 50s and then nothing more or nothing else noticeable for the 10-15 years after that is what seems odd to me. Bruce was pretty much identical to 5'11" listed Mickey Rourke in full pics and video from the 2010 Expendables premiere, which confirms he was roughly 5'11" flat between 50-55. But as of 2018, 5'10.75" was still the absolute lowest I'd guess Bruce at age 63. He did still edge 5'10.5" Stephen Colbert in 2015 as well.
But there's also the comparison to 5'11.25" listed Matthew Perry from about 2000 and it's doubtful Bruce would have lost much by then.
I do acknowledge he could look taller, such as when he appeared on Miami Vice. I haven't seen all of Armageddon since it was in theaters, but everything I have seen suggests he looked taller in that as well.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Dec/21
I think Willis can still make 5ft11 today. Peak not under 5ft11½ with a chance of 5ft11¾ but I'm not as convinced on him hitting the full 6ft afternoon time. He got beaten out by Travolta, Hanks, Washington, Olyphant and a number of other 6ft range dudes.
I think Willis can still make 5ft11 today. Peak not under 5ft11½ with a chance of 5ft11¾ but I'm not as convinced on him hitting the full 6ft afternoon time. He got beaten out by Travolta, Hanks, Washington, Olyphant and a number of other 6ft range dudes.
Rowan182.5cm said on 15/Dec/21
Looked like a solid 181 cm prime now he looks more 180ish cm
Looked like a solid 181 cm prime now he looks more 180ish cm
Alexy111 said on 8/Dec/21
5.11ft prime height!
5.11ft prime height!
berta said on 11/Nov/21
the strange thing is that Tom hanks was 1 inch taller in a old movie together.I Think This is really the most Bruce ever was.Coulh have been 181 but not under htat.
the strange thing is that Tom hanks was 1 inch taller in a old movie together.I Think This is really the most Bruce ever was.Coulh have been 181 but not under htat.
Myers Haddonfield said on 8/Nov/21
Definitely same as arnie. Or possibly more. 5-11 or just under.
Definitely same as arnie. Or possibly more. 5-11 or just under.
MaskDeMasque 5'9.5 said on 7/Nov/21
Taller than a flat 5'11 peak for sure but 5'11.5? I'm not convinced. He looked 5'11.25 in the first three die hard films I thought and was only 1-1.25 inches taller than 5'10 Billy Bob in Bandits.
Taller than a flat 5'11 peak for sure but 5'11.5? I'm not convinced. He looked 5'11.25 in the first three die hard films I thought and was only 1-1.25 inches taller than 5'10 Billy Bob in Bandits.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Nov/21
182-182.5cm peak
182-182.5cm peak
Johno said on 16/Oct/21
Someone I would definently say was over 5'11.
Someone I would definently say was over 5'11.
Slim 6'1.75 said on 29/Sep/21
182 peak
182 peak
Tall Sam said on 9/Sep/21
There’s quite a few shots from back in the Planet Hollywood days, Schwarzenegger was definitely taller than Willis it could look around two inches between them, but nowadays probably not much between them.
There’s quite a few shots from back in the Planet Hollywood days, Schwarzenegger was definitely taller than Willis it could look around two inches between them, but nowadays probably not much between them.
Westbound on Olympic said on 6/Sep/21
Oddly looks taller than Schwarzenegger.
Oddly looks taller than Schwarzenegger.
Willis Christian Macaraig said on 13/Aug/21
I would actually give Bruce Willis 5'11 1/4" or 181 cm since he is the same height as Leonardo DiCaprio.
I would actually give Bruce Willis 5'11 1/4" or 181 cm since he is the same height as Leonardo DiCaprio.
MaskDeMasque said on 10/Jun/21
5'11.25 peak
5'10.75 now
5'11.25 peak
5'10.75 now
Slim 6'1.5 said on 7/Jun/21
I doubt grant gustin and Christian bale would edge peak Willis
I doubt grant gustin and Christian bale would edge peak Willis
C?sar said on 4/Jun/21
And he is at least 2 inches shorter than Geena Davis (6 feet) in pics in the Web
And he is at least 2 inches shorter than Geena Davis (6 feet) in pics in the Web
C?sar said on 4/Jun/21
Bruce was the same height (barefoot ) as Paul Reiser (176,5 cm) in an episode of Mad about you. He was playing a mad man.
Bruce was the same height (barefoot ) as Paul Reiser (176,5 cm) in an episode of Mad about you. He was playing a mad man.
Rich Paul said on 11/May/21
Someone explain why Willis’s wife who’s listed at 5-10 is taller in every photo taken of the couple. Sometimes by an inch up to three inches. That would mean she’s as much as 6-3 in heels. I just don’t buy it. I do believe Willis is no more than 5-10.
Someone explain why Willis’s wife who’s listed at 5-10 is taller in every photo taken of the couple. Sometimes by an inch up to three inches. That would mean she’s as much as 6-3 in heels. I just don’t buy it. I do believe Willis is no more than 5-10.
E.Zoltan said on 1/May/21
Probably 182 cm peak and 179.5 cm now
Probably 182 cm peak and 179.5 cm now
berta said on 30/Apr/21
i think he was somewhere from 181 to 182 peak. probably 181,5, the strange thing is that tom hanks locked way taller in a movie together. it looked like 184 vs 180 maybe. but in reality i think hanks very legit 6 feet ( maybe couple mm over) and bruce 181-181,5
i think he was somewhere from 181 to 182 peak. probably 181,5, the strange thing is that tom hanks locked way taller in a movie together. it looked like 184 vs 180 maybe. but in reality i think hanks very legit 6 feet ( maybe couple mm over) and bruce 181-181,5
Bradley said on 16/Apr/21
G said he was 6-1 the 20 times he met him. Guess I met my astronaut.
G said he was 6-1 the 20 times he met him. Guess I met my astronaut.
Slim 6'1.5 said on 15/Apr/21
It’s safe to say we can Bruce to the 182cm pile for peak 👍
It’s safe to say we can Bruce to the 182cm pile for peak 👍
Canson said on 11/Apr/21
Maybe a couple hours after waking. I’d say 5’11.5 and 5’10.75 today but close enough
@Rising: maybe today he’s down to 179.6 but I can’t see 5’10.5 quite yet either
Maybe a couple hours after waking. I’d say 5’11.5 and 5’10.75 today but close enough
@Rising: maybe today he’s down to 179.6 but I can’t see 5’10.5 quite yet either
Canson said on 11/Apr/21
Maybe a couple hours after waking. I’d say 5’11.25 and 5’10.75 today but close enough
Maybe a couple hours after waking. I’d say 5’11.25 and 5’10.75 today but close enough
Cbrady said on 5/Apr/21
Did Bruce Willis destroy this reporter Doug Meehan's 5-11 claim in this video at 00:28 into this video reel? What if Bruce was only 5-11.25 at that time too
Click Here
Editor Rob
Did Bruce Willis destroy this reporter Doug Meehan's 5-11 claim in this video at 00:28 into this video reel? What if Bruce was only 5-11.25 at that time too
Click Here
Editor Robcouldn't watch that unfortunately ' blocked in your country'
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 21/Mar/21
🎂🎁 A belated Happy Birthday to Bruce Willis, who turned 6️⃣6️⃣ on Friday, 19th March. 🎁🎂
5ft11.5 peak; 5ft11 today.
🎂🎁 A belated Happy Birthday to Bruce Willis, who turned 6️⃣6️⃣ on Friday, 19th March. 🎁🎂
5ft11.5 peak; 5ft11 today.
Hong said on 15/Mar/21
Click Here He's wearing very high heels here.I wonder if he wore them a lot?
Editor Rob
Click Here He's wearing very high heels here.I wonder if he wore them a lot?
Editor Robif he wore them at times on Moonlighting he would have passed for 6ft plus quite easily
BT said on 18/Feb/21
@Rising174cm: I'm not saying he's 179 flat just yet, more that he will reach that mark soon. Near 179.5 cm is probably still a safe bet. Entering mid/late 60's I wouldn't be surprised at anyone losing 1.5-2 cm.
@Rising174cm: I'm not saying he's 179 flat just yet, more that he will reach that mark soon. Near 179.5 cm is probably still a safe bet. Entering mid/late 60's I wouldn't be surprised at anyone losing 1.5-2 cm.
Sammy 6'5" said on 10/Feb/21
I would honestly believe 6'0, in pulp fiction he is a little under an inch taller than ving rhames, who seemed to be a little bit over 5'11
I would honestly believe 6'0, in pulp fiction he is a little under an inch taller than ving rhames, who seemed to be a little bit over 5'11
Rising174cm said on 6/Feb/21
@BT: I generally agree with you, although if Bruce is really only 5'10.5" then M. Night Shyamalan is more 5'9" than even 5'9.5", much less 5'10". Although with 5'8" Mark Wahlberg, he could actually look that: Click Here Bruce was still a bit taller than 179 cm Colbert back in 2015, but even while they were promoting the first Expendables, Mickey Rourke was definitely at least as tall as Bruce, if not a hair taller. You could argue Bruce looks below 5'11" more recently with Samuel L. Jackson who himself was looking similar height to 6'1" Barry Bonds in the early 2000s.
@BT: I generally agree with you, although if Bruce is really only 5'10.5" then M. Night Shyamalan is more 5'9" than even 5'9.5", much less 5'10". Although with 5'8" Mark Wahlberg, he could actually look that: Click Here Bruce was still a bit taller than 179 cm Colbert back in 2015, but even while they were promoting the first Expendables, Mickey Rourke was definitely at least as tall as Bruce, if not a hair taller. You could argue Bruce looks below 5'11" more recently with Samuel L. Jackson who himself was looking similar height to 6'1" Barry Bonds in the early 2000s.
BT said on 5/Feb/21
My best guess for Willis' peak is 181 cm. Hard to see a comfortable 182 or near 183 with most people, though he could look it at times. He was definitely down to 180 ish by early/mid 50's, and looks to be closer to 179 today in mid/late 60's.
My best guess for Willis' peak is 181 cm. Hard to see a comfortable 182 or near 183 with most people, though he could look it at times. He was definitely down to 180 ish by early/mid 50's, and looks to be closer to 179 today in mid/late 60's.
Rising174cm said on 4/Feb/21
For those that don't remember Bruce was looking just 5'11" flat by 2007, here's Bruce that year with 5'9" Justin Long who you can see was wearing Converse: tinyurl.com/lc40u08u and at another event with Long: tinyurl.com/1rb9h87d tinyurl.com/1hy76ciq Not the best pic, but he was definitely shorter than 182 cm range Timothy Olyphant: tinyurl.com/2fcmz42d Here's a better, albeit not full pic showing Bruce shorter than Olyphant again:
tinyurl.com/dcqkwp9b (Long was in Converse at that event as well)
Of course, that's bad news for Clooney's Hope's of being a mm over 5'10.5" peak as Bruce looked 2 cm taller at that time in a series of photos, including a full one, but I digress.
But while a half inch loss by 52 would be perfectly typical, if Bruce shrunk the average, you'd expect him to have shrunk an inch by 65 and that doesn't seem to be the case. Here's Bruce at age 62 still looking a full 5'11" with M. Night Shyamalan: Click Here Click Here Granted, M. Night looks much more 5'9.5" than 5'10" to me, but Bruce still has more than just an inch on him.
For those that don't remember Bruce was looking just 5'11" flat by 2007, here's Bruce that year with 5'9" Justin Long who you can see was wearing Converse: tinyurl.com/lc40u08u and at another event with Long: tinyurl.com/1rb9h87d tinyurl.com/1hy76ciq Not the best pic, but he was definitely shorter than 182 cm range Timothy Olyphant: tinyurl.com/2fcmz42d Here's a better, albeit not full pic showing Bruce shorter than Olyphant again:
tinyurl.com/dcqkwp9b (Long was in Converse at that event as well)
Of course, that's bad news for Clooney's Hope's of being a mm over 5'10.5" peak as Bruce looked 2 cm taller at that time in a series of photos, including a full one, but I digress.
But while a half inch loss by 52 would be perfectly typical, if Bruce shrunk the average, you'd expect him to have shrunk an inch by 65 and that doesn't seem to be the case. Here's Bruce at age 62 still looking a full 5'11" with M. Night Shyamalan: Click Here Click Here Granted, M. Night looks much more 5'9.5" than 5'10" to me, but Bruce still has more than just an inch on him.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Feb/21
slim, ok Paxton and Liotta I might give slightly better odds of hitting the 6ft mark in their prime. Baldwin and Willis on the other hand were both generally edged out by solid 6ft dudes (e.g. Washington, Travolta and even Hanks).
slim, ok Paxton and Liotta I might give slightly better odds of hitting the 6ft mark in their prime. Baldwin and Willis on the other hand were both generally edged out by solid 6ft dudes (e.g. Washington, Travolta and even Hanks).
houss said on 1/Feb/21
You start to believe that willis is around the 6' mark then comes this
David Russell said on 20/Jan/21
There's no way he is anywhere near 6 ft. I'm 6 ft tall and I met him. He was a lot shorter than me. I would put him at 5 foot 6, maximum
You start to believe that willis is around the 6' mark then comes this
David Russell said on 20/Jan/21
There's no way he is anywhere near 6 ft. I'm 6 ft tall and I met him. He was a lot shorter than me. I would put him at 5 foot 6, maximum
slim 6'1 said on 30/Jan/21
Rampage, I reckon ray liotta is nearer 6’ than 5’11”
Rampage, I reckon ray liotta is nearer 6’ than 5’11”
Rising174cm said on 29/Jan/21
Bruce could look 5'11.5", even 6' at times in his 80s and 90s acting roles. I don't remember him looking more than 2" shorter than 6'1.5" Damon Wayans in The Last Boy Scout so I'll buy 5'11.5" peak. But Bruce was more 5'11" flat by 50ish so I don't know. A 1 cm loss by 50 is typical, but then did he lose 1/2" by early 50s and then nothing noticeable the last 15 years? That seems odd. I used to think Liotta was 6'0" and he could look 3" taller than De Niro - who may or may not have been 5'9", but now I think the 5'11.5" suits him and he's no more than 5'11" flat himself these days. As for Baldwin, I've mentioned before that my cousin grew up with the Baldwins(he was mainly friends with Stephen whom he kept in touch with) and there's universal agreement among everyone I know who has met or seen Alec that he was only about 5'11" flat. Now, he might be just under that.I don't expect anyone to just take my word for it, but I'm pretty certain of it. I'd give Liotta a better chance of a solid 182 cm peak than Willis and especially Baldwin.
@Rob: Btw, did you ever see Bruce's 6 ft claim yourself? I know Shredder mentioned it and I trust he wouldn't lie, but I was never able to find that appearance on Letterman myself(I think it was winter '08-'09).
Editor Rob
Bruce could look 5'11.5", even 6' at times in his 80s and 90s acting roles. I don't remember him looking more than 2" shorter than 6'1.5" Damon Wayans in The Last Boy Scout so I'll buy 5'11.5" peak. But Bruce was more 5'11" flat by 50ish so I don't know. A 1 cm loss by 50 is typical, but then did he lose 1/2" by early 50s and then nothing noticeable the last 15 years? That seems odd. I used to think Liotta was 6'0" and he could look 3" taller than De Niro - who may or may not have been 5'9", but now I think the 5'11.5" suits him and he's no more than 5'11" flat himself these days. As for Baldwin, I've mentioned before that my cousin grew up with the Baldwins(he was mainly friends with Stephen whom he kept in touch with) and there's universal agreement among everyone I know who has met or seen Alec that he was only about 5'11" flat. Now, he might be just under that.I don't expect anyone to just take my word for it, but I'm pretty certain of it. I'd give Liotta a better chance of a solid 182 cm peak than Willis and especially Baldwin.
@Rob: Btw, did you ever see Bruce's 6 ft claim yourself? I know Shredder mentioned it and I trust he wouldn't lie, but I was never able to find that appearance on Letterman myself(I think it was winter '08-'09).
Editor RobI could never find the video, Shredder did seem adamant he said it.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Jan/21
slim, I think Willis, Baldwin, Liotta and Paxton you could argue were within 182-183cm zone peak
slim, I think Willis, Baldwin, Liotta and Paxton you could argue were within 182-183cm zone peak
slim 6'1 said on 28/Jan/21
I’ve got him at a solid 182cm
I’ve got him at a solid 182cm
Rising174cm said on 21/Jan/21
He wasn't taller than 5'11.5", but could look 6 feet in the Miami Vice episode he appeared in. He seriously had a good 3" on Don Johnson and at least 2" on Philip Michael Thomas. He's appeared more like 5'11" flat since around age 50 so he's probably below that by now.
He wasn't taller than 5'11.5", but could look 6 feet in the Miami Vice episode he appeared in. He seriously had a good 3" on Don Johnson and at least 2" on Philip Michael Thomas. He's appeared more like 5'11" flat since around age 50 so he's probably below that by now.
David Russell said on 20/Jan/21
There's no way he is anywhere near 6 ft. I'm 6 ft tall and I met him. He was a lot shorter than me. I would put him at 5 foot 6, maximum.
There's no way he is anywhere near 6 ft. I'm 6 ft tall and I met him. He was a lot shorter than me. I would put him at 5 foot 6, maximum.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Jan/21
Has looked a weak 5ft11 the last couple of years though
Has looked a weak 5ft11 the last couple of years though
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Jan/21
5ft11½ is the lowest I'd argue peak
5ft11½ is the lowest I'd argue peak
Genau said on 5/Jan/21
Rob whats the highest and lowest youd argue for his peak and current and how tall do you think he was in R.E.D i would say 5ft11.25
Editor Rob
Rob whats the highest and lowest youd argue for his peak and current and how tall do you think he was in R.E.D i would say 5ft11.25
Editor RobI think 5ft 11.5 is about the most I would go, today just under 5ft 11 I still think he would measure
Scoobydoo said on 1/Jan/21
181 peak
179/180 now
181 peak
179/180 now
slim 6'1 said on 1/Jan/21
Nearer 6’ than 5’11”
181.5-182cm
Nearer 6’ than 5’11”
181.5-182cm
Slim 6'1" said on 25/Dec/20
182 peak, Travolta barely scraped him in pulp fiction
182 peak, Travolta barely scraped him in pulp fiction
Slim 6'1" said on 19/Dec/20
Edged Brad Pitt in twelve monkeys do nothing below 181 peak
Edged Brad Pitt in twelve monkeys do nothing below 181 peak
Slim 6'1" said on 19/Dec/20
182 peak is probable
182 peak is probable
Pat m said on 28/Nov/20
Weak 6ft, never gave off a big impression in the die hard movies but in pictures with Arnie and sly he's definitely close to 6ft prime, my guess is 5ft11 5/8ths and 5ft10.75 today maybe a tiny bit more
Weak 6ft, never gave off a big impression in the die hard movies but in pictures with Arnie and sly he's definitely close to 6ft prime, my guess is 5ft11 5/8ths and 5ft10.75 today maybe a tiny bit more
Genau said on 26/Nov/20
Peak 5ft11.5 - 5ft11.75
Currently 5ft10.75´- 5ft11
Peak 5ft11.5 - 5ft11.75
Currently 5ft10.75´- 5ft11
C Brady said on 11/Nov/20
how tall do you think he was around the time of "Live Free or Die Hard" came out? Evening height.
Editor Rob
how tall do you think he was around the time of "Live Free or Die Hard" came out? Evening height.
Editor Robhad he lost height by then? I'm not so sure if anything more than a few mm's.
Slim 6'1" said on 2/Nov/20
@Rob, is 5’11.75” arguable?
@Rob, is 5’11.75” arguable?
Slim 6'1" said on 31/Oct/20
182cm peak
180cm current
182cm peak
180cm current
Omarrrorton said on 11/Oct/20
Ii think his peak height was around 6ft nowadays he maybe 5ft11
Ii think his peak height was around 6ft nowadays he maybe 5ft11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Oct/20
Edged out Alec Baldwin in Mercury Rising
Edged out Alec Baldwin in Mercury Rising
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Sep/20
At his heaviest, over 200lbs
At his heaviest, over 200lbs
TheDon1528 said on 24/Sep/20
He was probably a little bit over 5'11" in his prime and around 5'10.5" these days
He was probably a little bit over 5'11" in his prime and around 5'10.5" these days
VitoCheng said on 21/Aug/20
Current:5'10.75"
Peak:5'11.75"
Current:5'10.75"
Peak:5'11.75"
Robert Shaw said on 20/Aug/20
Rob, how do you think of the weight of Bruce Willis? I think in the 175/180 range?
Editor Rob
Rob, how do you think of the weight of Bruce Willis? I think in the 175/180 range?
Editor RobCould see him at times in 180-90 range
Sinclair said on 18/Aug/20
I often struggle to see Bruce Willis as a true 6 foot man but he did look a strong 6 feet in the Miami Vice episode in which he guest starred in. Willis looked at least two inches taller than Philip Michael Thomas and maybe even three inches taller than Don Johnson in that episode. Perhaps, Willis’ footwear helped him out in that instance. I feel Tom Hanks was slightly taller than Willis when both men were in The Bonfire of The Vanities but the height difference was not that significant.
I often struggle to see Bruce Willis as a true 6 foot man but he did look a strong 6 feet in the Miami Vice episode in which he guest starred in. Willis looked at least two inches taller than Philip Michael Thomas and maybe even three inches taller than Don Johnson in that episode. Perhaps, Willis’ footwear helped him out in that instance. I feel Tom Hanks was slightly taller than Willis when both men were in The Bonfire of The Vanities but the height difference was not that significant.
Hulk.23 said on 15/Aug/20
In 12 monkeys he hedged out Pitt, yeah this is correct, but I doubt Pitt ever been a honest 5’11 guy. As I said before I think 5’10.75 for Pitt but with a reserve of 5’10.5. If he seemed a bit taller I think Willis had to be a good half-inche taller than him and even in Armageddon (probably he wore lifts) he looked even taller than a flat 6’ next to Affleck. However I think Rob listing is fair
In 12 monkeys he hedged out Pitt, yeah this is correct, but I doubt Pitt ever been a honest 5’11 guy. As I said before I think 5’10.75 for Pitt but with a reserve of 5’10.5. If he seemed a bit taller I think Willis had to be a good half-inche taller than him and even in Armageddon (probably he wore lifts) he looked even taller than a flat 6’ next to Affleck. However I think Rob listing is fair
Slim 6'1" said on 7/Aug/20
edged out pitt in 12 monkeys by a little bit so nothing under 181 and a chance for 182
edged out pitt in 12 monkeys by a little bit so nothing under 181 and a chance for 182
Slim 6'1" said on 7/Aug/20
182.5cm peak like grant gustin, perfect upgrade 5 11 7/8
182.5cm peak like grant gustin, perfect upgrade 5 11 7/8
Ben Bell said on 18/Jul/20
Wow. I always thought he was 5’10.
Wow. I always thought he was 5’10.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Jul/20
If he was a weak 6ft in afternoon/evening which many including myself believe he could have been, then it is likely he woke up minimum 6ft0½. The current peak is the lowest I’d argue.
If he was a weak 6ft in afternoon/evening which many including myself believe he could have been, then it is likely he woke up minimum 6ft0½. The current peak is the lowest I’d argue.
OriginalAnon said on 12/Jul/20
184/185cm out of bed peak is outrageous.
Currently looks no taller than 178cm. I don't think he was over 181cm peak and was probably more like 180.5cm
184/185cm out of bed peak is outrageous.
Currently looks no taller than 178cm. I don't think he was over 181cm peak and was probably more like 180.5cm
jano said on 9/Jun/20
I doubt Bruce was ever that tall, if you look the pictures with Geena Davis (who i think was a legit 183 in her twenties, but looks only 182 in that days) he is 178-179 cm max, and both are in flats, although Bruce is in some very flat shoes. I would give 180.5-181 Bruce peak, and 179 these days.
I doubt Bruce was ever that tall, if you look the pictures with Geena Davis (who i think was a legit 183 in her twenties, but looks only 182 in that days) he is 178-179 cm max, and both are in flats, although Bruce is in some very flat shoes. I would give 180.5-181 Bruce peak, and 179 these days.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/Apr/20
Out of bed peak was easily 184-185cm
Out of bed peak was easily 184-185cm
Hijoputamos said on 24/Mar/20
Hey Rob, how come he looked clearly shorter than Hanks in the Bonfire film? If Bruce was 5ft11 wouldn’t it be hard to spot him being shorter than Tom?
Editor Rob
Hey Rob, how come he looked clearly shorter than Hanks in the Bonfire film? If Bruce was 5ft11 wouldn’t it be hard to spot him being shorter than Tom?
Editor RobBeen a while since I looked at that film, but could you argue willis a flat 5ft11?
Light Worker said on 20/Mar/20
Bruce Willis wearing height-increasing elevator boots…
Click Here
Ditto: 1:25:30 - 1:25:35, 1:26:02 - 1:26:03
Click Here
Bruce Willis & Cybill Shepherd next to their performing spikes. She is wearing no shoes.
Click Here
Bruce Willis wearing height-increasing elevator boots…
Click Here
Ditto: 1:25:30 - 1:25:35, 1:26:02 - 1:26:03
Click Here
Bruce Willis & Cybill Shepherd next to their performing spikes. She is wearing no shoes.
Click Here
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 19/Mar/20
🎂🎁🎉💪 Happy Birthday Bruce! 💪🎉🎁🎂
Wishing Bruce Willis a Very Happy 65th Birthday! Lately, I've been seeing a great deal of 'Pulp Fiction' and he looks 6ft in that - no less, as indeed he did in 'The Sixth Sense'.
I bought a copy of M Night Shyamalan's film 'Glass' recently and I can't say he looks enormously shorter. 'Glass' is a film which combines the casts from 'Unbreakable' and 'Split', and it also stars Samuel L Jackson, James McAvoy and Sarah Paulson, so there are plenty of stars to compare him to.
Bruce's Birthday guess is 6ft for his peak and 5ft11.25 for today. 😁👍
🎂🎁🎉💪🎂🎁🎉🍺🎂🎁🎉💪🎂🎁🎉🍺
🎂🎁🎉💪 Happy Birthday Bruce! 💪🎉🎁🎂
Wishing Bruce Willis a Very Happy 65th Birthday! Lately, I've been seeing a great deal of 'Pulp Fiction' and he looks 6ft in that - no less, as indeed he did in 'The Sixth Sense'.
I bought a copy of M Night Shyamalan's film 'Glass' recently and I can't say he looks enormously shorter. 'Glass' is a film which combines the casts from 'Unbreakable' and 'Split', and it also stars Samuel L Jackson, James McAvoy and Sarah Paulson, so there are plenty of stars to compare him to.
Bruce's Birthday guess is 6ft for his peak and 5ft11.25 for today. 😁👍
🎂🎁🎉💪🎂🎁🎉🍺🎂🎁🎉💪🎂🎁🎉🍺
Jkiller said on 5/Mar/20
Peak height was around 5 ft 11 1/4th (181cm), nowadays not over 180cm.
Peak height was around 5 ft 11 1/4th (181cm), nowadays not over 180cm.
191 cm Jason said on 3/Mar/20
Really thought he was 6 feet.
Really thought he was 6 feet.
Panchsfhool said on 21/Feb/20
1.79-1.80
1.79-1.80
Dmeyer said on 10/Feb/20
at peak 181-182 is arguable 180 too low or 183 too high in 50 legit 180 today 179-80 like 179-179.5
at peak 181-182 is arguable 180 too low or 183 too high in 50 legit 180 today 179-80 like 179-179.5
RichardSpain said on 28/Dec/19
181cm young
180cm today
181cm young
180cm today
Mrbiggs33 said on 22/Sep/19
Rob how tall would he be first thing in the morning at peak height? I ask because I measure myself in the morning and am just below 5’10
Editor Rob
Rob how tall would he be first thing in the morning at peak height? I ask because I measure myself in the morning and am just below 5’10
Editor RobA peak Bruce had to clear 6ft first thing, I'd be shocked if he didn't
Spencer said on 21/Sep/19
5'11.5" peak. 180 cm today
5'11.5" peak. 180 cm today
Dmeyer said on 15/Jul/19
Considering Willis with macavoy who IS 170-1cm and oftenly wears 0,3in more shoes than others and sam jackson who IS 185-6cm , willis does look near enaugh 180cm
Considering Willis with macavoy who IS 170-1cm and oftenly wears 0,3in more shoes than others and sam jackson who IS 185-6cm , willis does look near enaugh 180cm
James G. said on 4/Jun/19
Looks 5’10.25” today, actually. Strange. In his prime he looked maybe 180-181cm
Looks 5’10.25” today, actually. Strange. In his prime he looked maybe 180-181cm
Sotiris Gravas said on 11/May/19
Tom Hanks (6'0" peak height) and Willis in "The Bonfire of the Vanities" (1990):
Click Here , Click Here , (footwear) Click Here
Willis and Arnie... (1991) Click Here, (1994) Click Here
Tom Hanks (6'0" peak height) and Willis in "The Bonfire of the Vanities" (1990):
Click Here , Click Here , (footwear) Click Here
Willis and Arnie... (1991) Click Here, (1994) Click Here
179cm guy said on 10/May/19
Peak: 5'11.5-11.75
Current: 5'10.75-11
Peak: 5'11.5-11.75
Current: 5'10.75-11
Duffer 5ft 11 said on 20/Apr/19
Looks the same size as me, round 5'11" and 185-190 lbs. I think he may have been a very weak 6' peak in his Moonlighting days. May stretch out to a smidge over 5'11 in the AM today. Tallish, but not overly so.
Looks the same size as me, round 5'11" and 185-190 lbs. I think he may have been a very weak 6' peak in his Moonlighting days. May stretch out to a smidge over 5'11 in the AM today. Tallish, but not overly so.
179cm guy said on 21/Mar/19
Rob, would you say that there's a greater chance of Bruce measuring at 5'11.25 or 5'11.75 at his peak?
Editor Rob
Rob, would you say that there's a greater chance of Bruce measuring at 5'11.25 or 5'11.75 at his peak?
Editor RobI'd have said an edge toward 11.75
billionaireslayer said on 20/Mar/19
Peak weak 5'11 maybe 5'10 n half
Peak weak 5'11 maybe 5'10 n half
179cm guy said on 14/Mar/19
Rob, are you going to give Willis the downgrade to 5'10.75 for his current listing?
Editor Rob
Rob, are you going to give Willis the downgrade to 5'10.75 for his current listing?
Editor RobBy the time I decide, he may well have shrunk to that figure...
'Annonymous' said on 13/Mar/19
Thanks for your answer Rob! I found two other pictures of Willis next to Samuel L. Jackson from 1995:
Click Here Click Here
As I said, the comparison of the peak height Bruce Willis with the peak height Samuel L. Jackson is unfortunately difficult... However, looking at them next to each other today, I do not see only two inches between them! Besides, Willis does not look like a full four inches taller today than James McAvoy. Here are their latest photos on which Willis and McAvoy have thicker shoes than Samuel:
Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
Now look at them when all three have similar footwear:
Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
Two inches of difference between Willis and Samuel today is simply not enough! Rob, let Willis downgrade to 5'10.75" or at least give Samuel an upgrade to 6'1.25".
Editor Rob
Thanks for your answer Rob! I found two other pictures of Willis next to Samuel L. Jackson from 1995:
Click Here Click Here
As I said, the comparison of the peak height Bruce Willis with the peak height Samuel L. Jackson is unfortunately difficult... However, looking at them next to each other today, I do not see only two inches between them! Besides, Willis does not look like a full four inches taller today than James McAvoy. Here are their latest photos on which Willis and McAvoy have thicker shoes than Samuel:
Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
Now look at them when all three have similar footwear:
Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
Two inches of difference between Willis and Samuel today is simply not enough! Rob, let Willis downgrade to 5'10.75" or at least give Samuel an upgrade to 6'1.25".
Editor RobSamuel actually can stand tall and look 186cm, Willis might be 5ft 10.75-11 zone today...it could be that Samuel can look around 6ft 1 but stretches a fraction over it.
'Annonymous' said on 9/Mar/19
I have been wondering both the peak height of Bruce Willis and Samuel L. Jackson for a long time. Here are their pictures next to each other in 1995:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Here you can get a better look at their footwear:
Click Here
Click Here
Then Bruce and Samuel side by side in 2000:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
And here their footwear:
Click Here
Click Here
I admits that the peak height comparison of Samuel L. Jackson with Bruce Willis is a difficult comparison. Rob, what do you see more decent chance on, 6'2.25" for Samuel or 5'11.75" for Willis in their prime?
Editor Rob
I have been wondering both the peak height of Bruce Willis and Samuel L. Jackson for a long time. Here are their pictures next to each other in 1995:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Here you can get a better look at their footwear:
Click Here
Click Here
Then Bruce and Samuel side by side in 2000:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
And here their footwear:
Click Here
Click Here
I admits that the peak height comparison of Samuel L. Jackson with Bruce Willis is a difficult comparison. Rob, what do you see more decent chance on, 6'2.25" for Samuel or 5'11.75" for Willis in their prime?
Editor RobI still feel somewhere around 5ft 11.5 as a peak fits overall, though I can see 11.75 as being the high end of a range. I don't know if I'd argue say 11.25 as a peak...it might be too low.
179cm guy said on 28/Feb/19
Rob, don't you think that Bruce might have dipped into the 179cm range by now?
Editor Rob
Rob, don't you think that Bruce might have dipped into the 179cm range by now?
Editor Rob5ft 10.75 is possible.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Feb/19
I can see an argument for 5ft11⅝ peak
I can see an argument for 5ft11⅝ peak
Dmeyer said on 6/Jan/19
My. Father.has looked 174ish in early 50s.then 172,5-173 by 60s and looks same as now at 71 looks same from 59-71
My. Father.has looked 174ish in early 50s.then 172,5-173 by 60s and looks same as now at 71 looks same from 59-71
Rising - 174 cm said on 2/Jan/19
I'm not sure if Bruce ever was much more than 5'11". He really could look 5'11.5" at times in the 80's and 90's, but he's looked 5'11" flat for at least a dozen years. The funny thing is I'd expect Bruce to have dropped to at least something like 5'10.75" by now, if not 5'10.5", yet he's still more than an inch taller than 5'10" listed M. Night Shyamalan: Click Here Click Here Click Here Granted, I don't think M. Night is a full 5'10", but Bruce also still edges 5'10.5" Stephen Colbert on video. Very strange Bruce would drop half an inch by his early 50's yet nothing else noticeable now in his early 60's.
@Sotiris: I guess Sly has never wanted to look 5'7" then because he never has. ;) Not tall or short, just average, but in a big man's world as you say. 174-175 cm just as his ex-wife said and Bruce is a couple of inches taller than Sly when Sly doesn't have his lifts, but nowhere near 4".
I'm not sure if Bruce ever was much more than 5'11". He really could look 5'11.5" at times in the 80's and 90's, but he's looked 5'11" flat for at least a dozen years. The funny thing is I'd expect Bruce to have dropped to at least something like 5'10.75" by now, if not 5'10.5", yet he's still more than an inch taller than 5'10" listed M. Night Shyamalan: Click Here Click Here Click Here Granted, I don't think M. Night is a full 5'10", but Bruce also still edges 5'10.5" Stephen Colbert on video. Very strange Bruce would drop half an inch by his early 50's yet nothing else noticeable now in his early 60's.
@Sotiris: I guess Sly has never wanted to look 5'7" then because he never has. ;) Not tall or short, just average, but in a big man's world as you say. 174-175 cm just as his ex-wife said and Bruce is a couple of inches taller than Sly when Sly doesn't have his lifts, but nowhere near 4".
179cm guy said on 1/Jan/19
181cm peak. 179cm now. He's looked like a 5'11 guy his entire life.
181cm peak. 179cm now. He's looked like a 5'11 guy his entire life.
Sotiris Gravas said on 1/Jan/19
@Robby Harris Sly could be any height he wanted to... like looking taller than Arnie and Willis:
Click Here When in reality, he was a tiny man in a big man's world:
Click Here The man was 5'7" barefoot as well as any height he felt like via elevator shoes.
@Robby Harris Sly could be any height he wanted to... like looking taller than Arnie and Willis:
Click Here When in reality, he was a tiny man in a big man's world:
Click Here The man was 5'7" barefoot as well as any height he felt like via elevator shoes.
FE said on 26/Dec/18
@Editor Rob,
How Long is his Head Exactly? Most people say his he has a Big Head, but I don't think it's any more than 9.5 or 9.75 @most.
Editor Rob
@Editor Rob,
How Long is his Head Exactly? Most people say his he has a Big Head, but I don't think it's any more than 9.5 or 9.75 @most.
Editor RobI do think near 9.75 is possible.
Animus said on 20/Nov/18
He was more of a 182cm guy than a 181cm guy in his prime, in my opinion. So, 5'11½ or 5'11⅝ seems like good guesses for prime Bruce.
He was more of a 182cm guy than a 181cm guy in his prime, in my opinion. So, 5'11½ or 5'11⅝ seems like good guesses for prime Bruce.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Oct/18
Dmeyer, Bruce would be edged by both of those guys peak
Dmeyer, Bruce would be edged by both of those guys peak
Dmeyer said on 15/Oct/18
Can look very similar to Washington and Travolta at peak
Can look very similar to Washington and Travolta at peak
Rising - 174 cm said on 3/Oct/18
@Robby: Yes, but technically Jtm's statement was correct. I mean what is imo the number 1 Stallone fan site says in the F.A.Q. that Sly is anywhere from 5'7" to 5'10.5" depending on the source so even Jtm's minimum statement demonstrates the absurdity of suggesting Stallone was similar height to Joe Pesci even while wearing elevator shoes.
@Robby: Yes, but technically Jtm's statement was correct. I mean what is imo the number 1 Stallone fan site says in the F.A.Q. that Sly is anywhere from 5'7" to 5'10.5" depending on the source so even Jtm's minimum statement demonstrates the absurdity of suggesting Stallone was similar height to Joe Pesci even while wearing elevator shoes.
Robby Harris said on 3/Oct/18
@Jtm: Stallone was a minimum of 174 cm in his prime. That's the absolute lowest. 5'7" was always a myth.
@Jtm: Stallone was a minimum of 174 cm in his prime. That's the absolute lowest. 5'7" was always a myth.
Canson said on 2/Oct/18
@Rising: LOL
@Rising: LOL
Jtm said on 2/Oct/18
stallone is at least 5'7.
stallone is at least 5'7.
Rising - 174 cm said on 2/Oct/18
@Terrijcso: LOL. So then Stallone was 5'3.5" in elevators? Why do people even bother posting this stuff? Reminds me of the Escape from LA actress who said Kurt Russell was 5'3". Wonder how Stallone's 6 foot ex-wife Brigitte Nielsen could have mistaken her husband for 5'9" after living with him for 3 years? Let me guess, she's really 5'6.5"?
@Terrijcso: LOL. So then Stallone was 5'3.5" in elevators? Why do people even bother posting this stuff? Reminds me of the Escape from LA actress who said Kurt Russell was 5'3". Wonder how Stallone's 6 foot ex-wife Brigitte Nielsen could have mistaken her husband for 5'9" after living with him for 3 years? Let me guess, she's really 5'6.5"?
Scoobydoo said on 14/Sep/18
I think this actor is 179 cm now and was
180 cm in Die hard maybe 181 cm not more.
I think this actor is 179 cm now and was
180 cm in Die hard maybe 181 cm not more.
Scoobydoo said on 14/Sep/18
I think this actor is 179 cm now and was
180 cm in Die hard maybe 181 cm not more.
I think this actor is 179 cm now and was
180 cm in Die hard maybe 181 cm not more.
Dmeyer said on 26/Aug/18
Caaq cage is solid 6'0 and is barefeet with relax posture
Caaq cage is solid 6'0 and is barefeet with relax posture
Rising - 174 cm said on 3/Aug/18
I pretty much agree with MAD SAM on this. Bruce still looks close to 5'11" and is slightly taller than 5'10.5" listed Colbert and even this year looks more than an inch taller than M. Night Shyamalan who Rob lists 5'10": Click Here I think M. Night is probably more 5'9.5", but Bruce actually doesn't look much shorter than he did over a decade ago. In fact, here's Bruce in 2000 looking shorter than 181 cm listed Matthew Perry: Click Here Click Here If you look at Bruce and Matthew on MTV's TRL in '04, Bruce is wearing boots and Perry is wearing Converse making it a near certainty Perry was taller by 2004. I already thought Bruce was 5'11" flat by age 50, but it looks possible he was only that tall in 2000 when he was only 45! If anything, I'd probably reverse Bruce's peak listing and Perry's listing.
I pretty much agree with MAD SAM on this. Bruce still looks close to 5'11" and is slightly taller than 5'10.5" listed Colbert and even this year looks more than an inch taller than M. Night Shyamalan who Rob lists 5'10": Click Here I think M. Night is probably more 5'9.5", but Bruce actually doesn't look much shorter than he did over a decade ago. In fact, here's Bruce in 2000 looking shorter than 181 cm listed Matthew Perry: Click Here Click Here If you look at Bruce and Matthew on MTV's TRL in '04, Bruce is wearing boots and Perry is wearing Converse making it a near certainty Perry was taller by 2004. I already thought Bruce was 5'11" flat by age 50, but it looks possible he was only that tall in 2000 when he was only 45! If anything, I'd probably reverse Bruce's peak listing and Perry's listing.
MAD SAM said on 30/Jul/18
Peak height of 181 cm, right now 179.5 cm ; his whole life he looked a 5’11” guy
Peak height of 181 cm, right now 179.5 cm ; his whole life he looked a 5’11” guy
Caaq said on 23/Jun/18
Why is nicholas cage called 6 feet when he comes up to 6 feet when standing in front of a height board. He must have had an inch of shoe. And ok..his hair was flat. So should we not call him 5 11 then?
Why is nicholas cage called 6 feet when he comes up to 6 feet when standing in front of a height board. He must have had an inch of shoe. And ok..his hair was flat. So should we not call him 5 11 then?
Caaq said on 22/Jun/18
Rob..please answer a very important question.
If an actor has a mug shot picture with average shoes on and standing pretty straight, then the mark he covers minus 2 inches will give pretty much his accurate height? And if bald then maybe minus one inch?
But Nicholas cage looks 6 feet in a mug shot and is also called 6 feet. Once he looked 6 1 in a mug shot, where he had shoes. And mostly he calls himself 6 1. Can u please explain?
Also..do u know if the statues in Madame tussaud are made larger than real life? I think they add 2 inches or more on some.of them.
Arnold Schwarzenegger is much smaller than his wax figures for.sure...
Please post my comment and please reply...really need to know..
Bruce Willis my guess... about 6 foot .5 inch in shoes standing with good posture.
Rob..please answer a very important question.
If an actor has a mug shot picture with average shoes on and standing pretty straight, then the mark he covers minus 2 inches will give pretty much his accurate height? And if bald then maybe minus one inch?
But Nicholas cage looks 6 feet in a mug shot and is also called 6 feet. Once he looked 6 1 in a mug shot, where he had shoes. And mostly he calls himself 6 1. Can u please explain?
Also..do u know if the statues in Madame tussaud are made larger than real life? I think they add 2 inches or more on some.of them.
Arnold Schwarzenegger is much smaller than his wax figures for.sure...
Please post my comment and please reply...really need to know..
Bruce Willis my guess... about 6 foot .5 inch in shoes standing with good posture.
Sandy Cowell said on 17/Jun/18
If Brucie offers you his Daddy's gold watch, make sure you wear plastic surgeons' gloves when handling it! If they're not available, then wash your hands afterwards! (Re: 'Pulp Fiction')
I always thought Bruce was in access of 6ft! He is one guy whose muscly physique does NOT shorten him; it does, in fact, make one think he's taller!
He is getting 5ft11 and a quarter-inch for today's height and 5ft11 and three-quarters for his sneaky, peaky, parky peak!
If Brucie offers you his Daddy's gold watch, make sure you wear plastic surgeons' gloves when handling it! If they're not available, then wash your hands afterwards! (Re: 'Pulp Fiction')
I always thought Bruce was in access of 6ft! He is one guy whose muscly physique does NOT shorten him; it does, in fact, make one think he's taller!
He is getting 5ft11 and a quarter-inch for today's height and 5ft11 and three-quarters for his sneaky, peaky, parky peak!
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 11/May/18
@Dracula You're funny. Willis is bald and taller not Colbert.
@Dracula You're funny. Willis is bald and taller not Colbert.
Dracula said on 19/Apr/18
5'10.5" peak height, now like 5'9.5". Stephen Colbert is 5'10" and he has an inch on 60yo Bruce Willis. Look at the end of the video.
Bruce Willis and Stephen Colbert vid: Click Here
5'10.5" peak height, now like 5'9.5". Stephen Colbert is 5'10" and he has an inch on 60yo Bruce Willis. Look at the end of the video.
Bruce Willis and Stephen Colbert vid: Click Here
guest_host_post said on 8/Apr/18
Spotted him on the street recently. He was smaller than expected- wearing black sneakers with a decent heel. Seemed to be around 5'9"-5'10". Nowhere close to 5'11" or 6'.
Spotted him on the street recently. He was smaller than expected- wearing black sneakers with a decent heel. Seemed to be around 5'9"-5'10". Nowhere close to 5'11" or 6'.
Andy182cm said on 10/Mar/18
Hi,in my opinion his peak at his 30's and 40's was 180cm, maybe 181cm max max nothing more! So max 5.11.25 and not a fraction more. Now at 60's in his older days he lost maybe 1-2cm so I think a flat 5'10 now, cause is 2 inches taller than stallone who's 5'8 (about 174 for Sly), not more!!!!
Hi,in my opinion his peak at his 30's and 40's was 180cm, maybe 181cm max max nothing more! So max 5.11.25 and not a fraction more. Now at 60's in his older days he lost maybe 1-2cm so I think a flat 5'10 now, cause is 2 inches taller than stallone who's 5'8 (about 174 for Sly), not more!!!!
Dmeyer said on 2/Mar/18
I do not agréé if you consider angle and. Posture Bruce is very close un height to Jimmy
I do not agréé if you consider angle and. Posture Bruce is very close un height to Jimmy
average joe said on 28/Feb/18
Just saw him on the Tonight Show.....If Jimmy is 5'11.5 .....then Willis is only 5'9".
Just saw him on the Tonight Show.....If Jimmy is 5'11.5 .....then Willis is only 5'9".
Junior Hernandez said on 13/Feb/18
181.5cm peak, 180cm now.
181.5cm peak, 180cm now.
Smiles03 said on 8/Feb/18
Probably was 6'0 when he was younger
Probably was 6'0 when he was younger
MJKoP said on 28/Jan/18
Johnboy said on 5/Jan/18
Hollywood is fantasyland. Everything, especially height and weight, is made-to-order. The Only Way, Bruce Willis ever saw 180 cm is by looking up at someone. Besides, his actual height is irrelevant. More importantly is how big does he present himself. Lots of short actors are made to look bigger by having them stand on something. Also, extra high-heeled boots or shoes add inches. Put a lot of these dudes next to Jennifer Lawrence and see what happens.
What are you talking about? I don't even feel like bothering to point out how many ways in which your post doesn't make sense.
Johnboy said on 5/Jan/18
Hollywood is fantasyland. Everything, especially height and weight, is made-to-order. The Only Way, Bruce Willis ever saw 180 cm is by looking up at someone. Besides, his actual height is irrelevant. More importantly is how big does he present himself. Lots of short actors are made to look bigger by having them stand on something. Also, extra high-heeled boots or shoes add inches. Put a lot of these dudes next to Jennifer Lawrence and see what happens.
What are you talking about? I don't even feel like bothering to point out how many ways in which your post doesn't make sense.
Smiles03 said on 27/Jan/18
He problay used to be 6'0 when he was younger
He problay used to be 6'0 when he was younger
Johnboy said on 5/Jan/18
Hollywood is fantasyland. Everything, especially height and weight, is made-to-order. The Only Way, Bruce Willis ever saw 180 cm is by looking up at someone. Besides, his actual height is irrelevant. More importantly is how big does he present himself. Lots of short actors are made to look bigger by having them stand on something. Also, extra high-heeled boots or shoes add inches. Put a lot of these dudes next to Jennifer Lawrence and see what happens.
Hollywood is fantasyland. Everything, especially height and weight, is made-to-order. The Only Way, Bruce Willis ever saw 180 cm is by looking up at someone. Besides, his actual height is irrelevant. More importantly is how big does he present himself. Lots of short actors are made to look bigger by having them stand on something. Also, extra high-heeled boots or shoes add inches. Put a lot of these dudes next to Jennifer Lawrence and see what happens.
Animus said on 24/Dec/17
I'd say he was 181-182cm in his prime rather than 182-183cm.
I'd say he was 181-182cm in his prime rather than 182-183cm.
Psychedelic Earth 187 said on 20/Dec/17
I would say 182.0 is likelier than this current listing.
I would say 182.0 is likelier than this current listing.
Rising - 174 cm said on 17/Dec/17
I've never actually seen Bruce claim 6'1" directly, however, he was listed at that height in his bio on his official site. Whether that's what Bruce told people directly, or what his PR came up with, I don't know. I remember Shredder mentioning Bruce claimed 6' on Letterman around 2009ish I suppose. I never saw it myself, but I guess Rob did to have added it and almost any legit 5'11" guy like Bruce will at least claim 6'. He's still near enough 5'11" -- I wouldn't go any lower than 5'10.75" even today -- and was at least a solid 5'11" until age 50, probably 5'11" and change. Bruce has been close to Arnie's height since the first Expendables, but back in the Planet Hollywood Days he was around a couple of inches shorter and still noticeably shorter even a decade ago.
But if you watch his first starring role in Blind Date, he's more than just an inch taller than Phil Hartman who Rob has 5'10". He doesn't seem as much as 5 inches shorter than 6'4" John Larroquette either and in general seems a solid "tallish" height.
I've never actually seen Bruce claim 6'1" directly, however, he was listed at that height in his bio on his official site. Whether that's what Bruce told people directly, or what his PR came up with, I don't know. I remember Shredder mentioning Bruce claimed 6' on Letterman around 2009ish I suppose. I never saw it myself, but I guess Rob did to have added it and almost any legit 5'11" guy like Bruce will at least claim 6'. He's still near enough 5'11" -- I wouldn't go any lower than 5'10.75" even today -- and was at least a solid 5'11" until age 50, probably 5'11" and change. Bruce has been close to Arnie's height since the first Expendables, but back in the Planet Hollywood Days he was around a couple of inches shorter and still noticeably shorter even a decade ago.
But if you watch his first starring role in Blind Date, he's more than just an inch taller than Phil Hartman who Rob has 5'10". He doesn't seem as much as 5 inches shorter than 6'4" John Larroquette either and in general seems a solid "tallish" height.
Ted said on 9/Dec/17
Typical 181-182cm.
Typical 181-182cm.
Jim Hopper said on 26/Nov/17
Seen a few times he claimed 6-1. Utter bs. Looks same as Arnie imo
Seen a few times he claimed 6-1. Utter bs. Looks same as Arnie imo
Slim 185 said on 16/Nov/17
Long overdue for a 182 CM upgrade imho.
Long overdue for a 182 CM upgrade imho.
Slim 184 said on 8/Nov/17
Rob, when will Mr. Willis receive his well deserved 182 CM upgrade? He pulled it off in the 90’s films I’ve seen him tbh.
Rob, when will Mr. Willis receive his well deserved 182 CM upgrade? He pulled it off in the 90’s films I’ve seen him tbh.
Jeremy said on 7/Nov/17
182-183 peak, in shoes 185. Today he’s probably in the 180-81 range. But I can’t see him under that
182-183 peak, in shoes 185. Today he’s probably in the 180-81 range. But I can’t see him under that
Slim 6' said on 29/Oct/17
Needs a 182 range upgrade.
Needs a 182 range upgrade.
Rising - 174 cm said on 12/Oct/17
The thing is, I highly doubt Don Johnson was as tall as 5'9.5". In that very same episode, he's face to face with weak 5'9" Edward James Olmos indoors and looks shorter. But I'd say 5'9" flat back then for DJ, maybe 5'9.25" at best. He still had 3" on DJ, though so he could pull off 6 feet.
As for the average guess, I think the peak height guess is fair, as is Rob's listing, but the current height average guess is short-changing Bruce as he still tends to look about 5'11". Interestingly, they shot A Good Day to Die Hard in such a way that it's sometimes difficult to see a difference between Bruce and Jai Courtney, but then there are some shots that reveal Bruce noticeably shorter -- perhaps a couple inches -- and shorter than Sebastian Koch as well so 5'10.75" today is possible.
The thing is, I highly doubt Don Johnson was as tall as 5'9.5". In that very same episode, he's face to face with weak 5'9" Edward James Olmos indoors and looks shorter. But I'd say 5'9" flat back then for DJ, maybe 5'9.25" at best. He still had 3" on DJ, though so he could pull off 6 feet.
As for the average guess, I think the peak height guess is fair, as is Rob's listing, but the current height average guess is short-changing Bruce as he still tends to look about 5'11". Interestingly, they shot A Good Day to Die Hard in such a way that it's sometimes difficult to see a difference between Bruce and Jai Courtney, but then there are some shots that reveal Bruce noticeably shorter -- perhaps a couple inches -- and shorter than Sebastian Koch as well so 5'10.75" today is possible.
Slim 6' said on 10/Oct/17
Nothing under 5'11.75" peak.
Nothing under 5'11.75" peak.
Slim 6' said on 9/Oct/17
Agree with Rampage. Needs a 182 range upgrade.
Agree with Rampage. Needs a 182 range upgrade.
Slim 6' said on 7/Oct/17
It goes to show that the average guess is flawed and users always guess lower than rob without even looking at pictures or videos of the celeb.
It goes to show that the average guess is flawed and users always guess lower than rob without even looking at pictures or videos of the celeb.
Slim 6' said on 7/Oct/17
He really was 182 CM in his glory days, 5'11.5"-6'
That's how tall he looked in pulp fiction and twelve monkeys.
He really was 182 CM in his glory days, 5'11.5"-6'
That's how tall he looked in pulp fiction and twelve monkeys.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Oct/17
I saw that episode of Miami Vice. It was right before he got Moonlighting. If Johnson was 5ft9½, Bruce actually looked near 6ft1! No less than 6ft anyway.
I saw that episode of Miami Vice. It was right before he got Moonlighting. If Johnson was 5ft9½, Bruce actually looked near 6ft1! No less than 6ft anyway.
Rising - 174 cm said on 1/Oct/17
He could pass for a weak 6' or 5'11.75"-6'0" at times in his prime. He looked it in Miami Vice as he had 3" on Don Johnson, who I believe was about 5'9" back then and an easy 2" or so on Philip Michael Thomas, who Rob lists 5'10". But Arnold was consistently a good 2" taller back in the 90's and weak 5'9" Sly(in cowboy boots) even pulled off looking Bruce's height in an early 90's Planet Hollywood video! So Bruce is a bit of a mystery to me looking closer to 6' and closer to 5'11" at different times. Dmeyer is right about the pic above. Bruce was 5'11" flat by Perfect Stranger and in general by age 50, but he doesn't look to have shrunk much more since, if at all as he still looks 5'11" or at worst, a fraction under. I'd say he was 181 cm by his late 40's judging by the 2003 video where he just edged George W. Bush by a hair, if you pardon the expression. Not a guy who seems to care about his height.
He could pass for a weak 6' or 5'11.75"-6'0" at times in his prime. He looked it in Miami Vice as he had 3" on Don Johnson, who I believe was about 5'9" back then and an easy 2" or so on Philip Michael Thomas, who Rob lists 5'10". But Arnold was consistently a good 2" taller back in the 90's and weak 5'9" Sly(in cowboy boots) even pulled off looking Bruce's height in an early 90's Planet Hollywood video! So Bruce is a bit of a mystery to me looking closer to 6' and closer to 5'11" at different times. Dmeyer is right about the pic above. Bruce was 5'11" flat by Perfect Stranger and in general by age 50, but he doesn't look to have shrunk much more since, if at all as he still looks 5'11" or at worst, a fraction under. I'd say he was 181 cm by his late 40's judging by the 2003 video where he just edged George W. Bush by a hair, if you pardon the expression. Not a guy who seems to care about his height.
Slim said on 30/Sep/17
Solid 182/183 cms(6') in prime, needs an upgrade.
I can imagine this guy being eye to eye with nick cage and john Travolta at least once.
Solid 182/183 cms(6') in prime, needs an upgrade.
I can imagine this guy being eye to eye with nick cage and john Travolta at least once.
Dmeyer said on 29/Sep/17
Halle IS easily 174-174,5cm shoes on in this pic Willis IS about 182-182,5cm shoes on so about 5 ft 11 without
Halle IS easily 174-174,5cm shoes on in this pic Willis IS about 182-182,5cm shoes on so about 5 ft 11 without
Richardspain said on 28/Sep/17
Rob;
Willis is an American actor all right! but he was born in Germany. Do you know it?
He was born in Germany but he was there in Germany a short time because his parents left to America soon.
Rob;
Willis is an American actor all right! but he was born in Germany. Do you know it?
He was born in Germany but he was there in Germany a short time because his parents left to America soon.
Slim said on 19/Sep/17
Hi rob, where do you think Bruce would stadiometre in the 70's and 80's:=?
A:180
B:181
C:182
D:183
E:184
F:185
Editor Rob
Hi rob, where do you think Bruce would stadiometre in the 70's and 80's:=?
A:180
B:181
C:182
D:183
E:184
F:185
Editor Rob wouldn't have thought much less than C-D zone
Anonymous said on 15/Sep/17
179/180 cm nowadays
181/182 cm young.
I agree with this website and with his great creator Rob.
179/180 cm nowadays
181/182 cm young.
I agree with this website and with his great creator Rob.
James B said on 2/Sep/17
Rob I remember 10 years Glenn blew up at Demeyer for implying that Bruce Willis was 181-182cm in his peak. I do also remember you saying too Glenn after he lashed out at Demeyer "time out here Glenn"
I remember Glenn frequently saw Bruce at 6'1 and even 6'2 once. Do you think he got furious because he wanted too keep his 5ft8 dream alive by insisting Bruce was taller because he knew himself that no way he was 5'8 if Bruce was 5'11 range?
Editor Rob
Rob I remember 10 years Glenn blew up at Demeyer for implying that Bruce Willis was 181-182cm in his peak. I do also remember you saying too Glenn after he lashed out at Demeyer "time out here Glenn"
I remember Glenn frequently saw Bruce at 6'1 and even 6'2 once. Do you think he got furious because he wanted too keep his 5ft8 dream alive by insisting Bruce was taller because he knew himself that no way he was 5'8 if Bruce was 5'11 range?
Editor Rob sometimes he probably never realised he was on the shorter parts of sidewalks, I'm sure that would cause anybody guessing heights some confusion at times!
Rising - 174 cm said on 2/Sep/17
I agree with highlysuspect, though more on the current height as there really hasn't been much evidence to suggest Bruce is down to 179. I'm not sure where that assumption comes from. Still looks like a 180 cm/near 5'11" guy. But probably 5'11.25"-5'11.5" range peak, imo. Wouldn't go quite as high as 182 as Arnold was always near 2" taller and even Sly on a good day could appear Bruce's height with his best pair of cowboy boots.
I agree with highlysuspect, though more on the current height as there really hasn't been much evidence to suggest Bruce is down to 179. I'm not sure where that assumption comes from. Still looks like a 180 cm/near 5'11" guy. But probably 5'11.25"-5'11.5" range peak, imo. Wouldn't go quite as high as 182 as Arnold was always near 2" taller and even Sly on a good day could appear Bruce's height with his best pair of cowboy boots.
Timothy Jones said on 31/Aug/17
Legendary actor. 5 foot 11. Around 181cm in prime
Legendary actor. 5 foot 11. Around 181cm in prime
highlysuspect said on 28/Aug/17
Definitely taller than the poll suggests. Peak at least 182cm now 180cm
Definitely taller than the poll suggests. Peak at least 182cm now 180cm
Spencer said on 28/Aug/17
181 peak 179 now is my guess
181 peak 179 now is my guess
Junior said on 18/Aug/17
Accurate listing.
Accurate listing.
Rising - 174 cm said on 14/Aug/17
Actually, I'd say that film was literally right before Brad seemed to "grow" from strong 5'10"/weak 5'11" range to strong 5'11", even scraping a weak 6' at times. Pitt started looking taller to me around '96-'97. As for Bruce, I'd say the real argument is between whether he was always a 5'11" guy or 5'11.5" when young, or possibly in between. I'd put him at 181 cm, but no more with George Bush in 2003 as he just edged him out, but 5'11" flat by Live Free or Die Hard at 51-52 seeing him with Justin Long and Timothy Olyphant. No less, though as he was clearly taller than Clooney at that same time, as I posted on George's page: Click Here Click Here He still seemed to hold onto 5'11" during the first 2 Expendables and the 2 Red films from 2010-2013 seeing him look taller than John Malkovich and about the same as Mickey Rourke. I don't know if he's dropped a fraction the past 4 years - I honestly don't see much evidence of that - but I'd still say 5'10.75" minimum. I'm not sure why many are seeing Bruce in the 178-179 range. But 5'9" max Sly Stallone was able to look as tall as Bruce in the early 90s and Arnold was a good 2 inches taller or so. Sly could pull off 5'11", but could he pull off any more than that with cowboy boots and presumably lifts inside? It depends on whether you think Arnold was more 6'1" or 6'1.5" at that time as well. But Bruce did have a good 3 inches on Don Johnson when he guest-starred on Miami Vice and I peg Johnson in that same 5'8.5"-5'9" range as Sly while Rob has him 5'9.5", but Bruce looks over 5'11" with him either way. So I'd say Bruce looked more of a strong 5'11" range to me than Leo DiCaprio or Alec Baldwin. I'd either go with Rob's listing or the average guess for peak rather than a flat 5'11".
Actually, I'd say that film was literally right before Brad seemed to "grow" from strong 5'10"/weak 5'11" range to strong 5'11", even scraping a weak 6' at times. Pitt started looking taller to me around '96-'97. As for Bruce, I'd say the real argument is between whether he was always a 5'11" guy or 5'11.5" when young, or possibly in between. I'd put him at 181 cm, but no more with George Bush in 2003 as he just edged him out, but 5'11" flat by Live Free or Die Hard at 51-52 seeing him with Justin Long and Timothy Olyphant. No less, though as he was clearly taller than Clooney at that same time, as I posted on George's page: Click Here Click Here He still seemed to hold onto 5'11" during the first 2 Expendables and the 2 Red films from 2010-2013 seeing him look taller than John Malkovich and about the same as Mickey Rourke. I don't know if he's dropped a fraction the past 4 years - I honestly don't see much evidence of that - but I'd still say 5'10.75" minimum. I'm not sure why many are seeing Bruce in the 178-179 range. But 5'9" max Sly Stallone was able to look as tall as Bruce in the early 90s and Arnold was a good 2 inches taller or so. Sly could pull off 5'11", but could he pull off any more than that with cowboy boots and presumably lifts inside? It depends on whether you think Arnold was more 6'1" or 6'1.5" at that time as well. But Bruce did have a good 3 inches on Don Johnson when he guest-starred on Miami Vice and I peg Johnson in that same 5'8.5"-5'9" range as Sly while Rob has him 5'9.5", but Bruce looks over 5'11" with him either way. So I'd say Bruce looked more of a strong 5'11" range to me than Leo DiCaprio or Alec Baldwin. I'd either go with Rob's listing or the average guess for peak rather than a flat 5'11".
Slim 182 cm said on 13/Aug/17
Bruce was flat on the ground, I believe in sandals or slippers. Speaking of brad, the poor thing must of tried to insert his lifts into those shoes!
Bruce was flat on the ground, I believe in sandals or slippers. Speaking of brad, the poor thing must of tried to insert his lifts into those shoes!
Rising - 174 cm said on 11/Aug/17
Not the best film for height comparisons, but I definitely thought Bruce was taller as well, partially due to the fact his head seems visibly bigger than Pitt's. I think Brad had more footwear as well since he wore these: Click Here And correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Bruce wearing slippers? I think Pitt at 5'10.5" is more likely than Bruce at 5'11.75". Of course, a difference can always look smaller or bigger than it is.
Not the best film for height comparisons, but I definitely thought Bruce was taller as well, partially due to the fact his head seems visibly bigger than Pitt's. I think Brad had more footwear as well since he wore these: Click Here And correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Bruce wearing slippers? I think Pitt at 5'10.5" is more likely than Bruce at 5'11.75". Of course, a difference can always look smaller or bigger than it is.
Slim 182 cm said on 9/Aug/17
In "twelve monkeys", Bruce Willis was 2 cm taller than brad pitt. This would make brad 5'10.75 or Bruce 5'11.75.
In "twelve monkeys", Bruce Willis was 2 cm taller than brad pitt. This would make brad 5'10.75 or Bruce 5'11.75.
Rising - 174 cm said on 7/Aug/17
I never heard the 6'3" illusion!! Wow. I remember Glenn insisting Bruce was 6'1" and could even look 6'2", but 6'3"? Even when I accepted what Glenn said uncritically, I had a tough time giving Bruce anything over 5'11.75" or so. I have seen Bruce pull off 6' once in a while, which would look 6'1" if Glenn is taking himself at 5'8", but 6'3"? I've never seen the Letterman clip where Bruce apparently finally claimed a height, but Glenn's reaction to seeing Bruce claim a flat 6' would be interesting. Then again, that hasn't stopped him from putting guys who claim 5'10" like Stallone, Gibson and Colin Farrell at 5'11". Or Will Smith claiming 6'2" and Glenn giving him 6'3".
Here's Bruce 10 years ago with a real 6'1" man Kevin Costner: Click Here Both were the exact same age - 52 with Bruce a whopping 2 months younger - and Costner is clearly taller without exception in the entire series of photos that night. Bruce may have lost a fraction by then since I can buy anywhere from 5'11"-5'11.5" peak, but a flat 5'11" by that point based on Live Free or Die Hard. How tall did Glenn say Justin Long was? Certainly not 5'9" if Bruce was 6'1". I'd also give Bruce 181 cm max by late 40s since he seemed to just barely edge out George W. Bush on video.
As for The Last Boy Scout, I'd agree it was probably closer to 2 inches. And yes, that movie was awesome. "Touch me again and I'll kill ya." "Told you."
I never heard the 6'3" illusion!! Wow. I remember Glenn insisting Bruce was 6'1" and could even look 6'2", but 6'3"? Even when I accepted what Glenn said uncritically, I had a tough time giving Bruce anything over 5'11.75" or so. I have seen Bruce pull off 6' once in a while, which would look 6'1" if Glenn is taking himself at 5'8", but 6'3"? I've never seen the Letterman clip where Bruce apparently finally claimed a height, but Glenn's reaction to seeing Bruce claim a flat 6' would be interesting. Then again, that hasn't stopped him from putting guys who claim 5'10" like Stallone, Gibson and Colin Farrell at 5'11". Or Will Smith claiming 6'2" and Glenn giving him 6'3".
Here's Bruce 10 years ago with a real 6'1" man Kevin Costner: Click Here Both were the exact same age - 52 with Bruce a whopping 2 months younger - and Costner is clearly taller without exception in the entire series of photos that night. Bruce may have lost a fraction by then since I can buy anywhere from 5'11"-5'11.5" peak, but a flat 5'11" by that point based on Live Free or Die Hard. How tall did Glenn say Justin Long was? Certainly not 5'9" if Bruce was 6'1". I'd also give Bruce 181 cm max by late 40s since he seemed to just barely edge out George W. Bush on video.
As for The Last Boy Scout, I'd agree it was probably closer to 2 inches. And yes, that movie was awesome. "Touch me again and I'll kill ya." "Told you."
MOF said on 3/Aug/17
AlexItaly said on 17/Jun/17
He was about an inch shorter, not more, than 187 Damon Wayans in the 1991 masterpiece "the last boyscout". I think he was around 6 even when young, don't you think Rob?
Not really true, is you watch that movie more carefully he consistently looks over an inch smaller, much closer to two inches. If Damon Wayans is 6'1" then Bruce is much closer to 5'11" than 6 feet, at least in 1991. And yes, that movie is a classic.
AlexItaly said on 17/Jun/17
He was about an inch shorter, not more, than 187 Damon Wayans in the 1991 masterpiece "the last boyscout". I think he was around 6 even when young, don't you think Rob?
Not really true, is you watch that movie more carefully he consistently looks over an inch smaller, much closer to two inches. If Damon Wayans is 6'1" then Bruce is much closer to 5'11" than 6 feet, at least in 1991. And yes, that movie is a classic.
MJKoP said on 31/Jul/17
Brad said on 19/Jul/17
G said 6' 1"....and saw him 20 times.
"or 6-2. with a 6-3 illusion"
;)
Editor Rob
Brad said on 19/Jul/17
G said 6' 1"....and saw him 20 times.
"or 6-2. with a 6-3 illusion"
;)
Editor Rob maybe Bruce knew the best part of the sidewalk to stroll down - nearer the building, away from the kerb.
Slim 182 cm said on 27/Jul/17
Great listing, I'd give quarter inch upgrade. 👍🏻 😊
Great listing, I'd give quarter inch upgrade. 👍🏻 😊
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Jul/17
184.6cm out of bed
184.6cm out of bed
Aaron said on 24/Jul/17
perfect listing
perfect listing
Brad said on 19/Jul/17
G said 6' 1"....and saw him 20 times.
G said 6' 1"....and saw him 20 times.
Rising - 174 cm said on 19/Jul/17
Here's a tough one, who was taller in 2010, Mickey Rourke or Bruce Willis?
Full pics: Click Here
Video: Click Here
They look pretty much identical in the pics to me, though if I had to say one appeared taller in the pics, I'd guess Bruce by 1/4" or less, however I still can't tell from the video, but would probably guess Mickey taller if I had to choose who appeared taller in the video, but then Mickey's shoes may have slightly bigger heels.
I'd have to say that a 55 year old Bruce and 57-58 year old Mickey were both bang on 5'11". As far as Bruce's height, I'd say by late 40s, he was 181 cm and then based on seeing him next to Timothy Olyphant and Justin Long when Live Free or Die Hard came out, he was 5'11" flat by early 50s and as far as I can tell, he's still around that height. So my best guess is a little gradual height loss. Whether he was as tall at his peak as Rob lists him or never taller than 181 is the question. Seeing a weak 5'9" Sly Stallone able to look at least as tall as Bruce on video makes me wonder: Click Here
Sly has pulled off 5'11" enough, but could he really be pulling off 5'11.5" there? I guess it depends on whether Arnold was more 6'1" flat or 6'1.5" by that time since I would say he's about 2 inches taller than Bruce.
Here's a tough one, who was taller in 2010, Mickey Rourke or Bruce Willis?
Full pics: Click Here
Video: Click Here
They look pretty much identical in the pics to me, though if I had to say one appeared taller in the pics, I'd guess Bruce by 1/4" or less, however I still can't tell from the video, but would probably guess Mickey taller if I had to choose who appeared taller in the video, but then Mickey's shoes may have slightly bigger heels.
I'd have to say that a 55 year old Bruce and 57-58 year old Mickey were both bang on 5'11". As far as Bruce's height, I'd say by late 40s, he was 181 cm and then based on seeing him next to Timothy Olyphant and Justin Long when Live Free or Die Hard came out, he was 5'11" flat by early 50s and as far as I can tell, he's still around that height. So my best guess is a little gradual height loss. Whether he was as tall at his peak as Rob lists him or never taller than 181 is the question. Seeing a weak 5'9" Sly Stallone able to look at least as tall as Bruce on video makes me wonder: Click Here
Sly has pulled off 5'11" enough, but could he really be pulling off 5'11.5" there? I guess it depends on whether Arnold was more 6'1" flat or 6'1.5" by that time since I would say he's about 2 inches taller than Bruce.
RisingForce said on 15/Jul/17
@Richard: What I mean is that I would say 179 is at least a reasonable guess for someone to make so I wouldn't say someone guessing 179 is trolling, but I personally haven't seen any evidence posted to show Bruce is that low yet.
@Richard: What I mean is that I would say 179 is at least a reasonable guess for someone to make so I wouldn't say someone guessing 179 is trolling, but I personally haven't seen any evidence posted to show Bruce is that low yet.
RichardSpain said on 13/Jul/17
@Rising
About last you said, In "Current option" you can see people here give to Willis 179. That's the average here in this moment.
And Rob gives Willis 180 cm nowadays but it is his opinion very respectable of course.
@Rising
About last you said, In "Current option" you can see people here give to Willis 179. That's the average here in this moment.
And Rob gives Willis 180 cm nowadays but it is his opinion very respectable of course.
RisingForce said on 12/Jul/17
Bruce and Morgan Freeman in 2010: Click Here
I suppose Freeman was 187 cm at that time at age 73 and he looks maybe 2.5" taller than Bruce to me, possibly a bit more if he stood straighter.
Bruce and Morgan Freeman in 2010: Click Here
I suppose Freeman was 187 cm at that time at age 73 and he looks maybe 2.5" taller than Bruce to me, possibly a bit more if he stood straighter.
RisingForce said on 11/Jul/17
That photo is now 7 years old and Willis wasn't 3 cm shorter than Arnold at that event. Arnold may have still been near 6 feet at that time, but 182 range was already possible, either slightly above or below 182. Bruce was definitely more 180 then. Likely 5'11" or at worst 5'10.75" seeing him with Mickey Rourke that year and I've seen no real evidence he's shrunk much more, if at all the last 7 years. In fact, a year later in 2011, Bruce still looked an easy 1.5" taller than Matt Damon, who I'd say is 176.5 cm: Click Here Sly was still likely at his peak height in 2010, so I'd say 174.5 to 175 cm, but 174 has always been arguable for him.
Nowadays, I'd say as short 179.5 is possible for Bruce, but I'm not actually seeing evidence posted on this page to indicate he could be 179.
That photo is now 7 years old and Willis wasn't 3 cm shorter than Arnold at that event. Arnold may have still been near 6 feet at that time, but 182 range was already possible, either slightly above or below 182. Bruce was definitely more 180 then. Likely 5'11" or at worst 5'10.75" seeing him with Mickey Rourke that year and I've seen no real evidence he's shrunk much more, if at all the last 7 years. In fact, a year later in 2011, Bruce still looked an easy 1.5" taller than Matt Damon, who I'd say is 176.5 cm: Click Here Sly was still likely at his peak height in 2010, so I'd say 174.5 to 175 cm, but 174 has always been arguable for him.
Nowadays, I'd say as short 179.5 is possible for Bruce, but I'm not actually seeing evidence posted on this page to indicate he could be 179.
RichardSpain said on 10/Jul/17
Nowadays Willis is under 180 cm.
Here next to Arnold and Stallone.
Click Here
I give to them:
Willis 179cm
Arnold 182cm
Stallone 174cm
They will not be more than that guys!
Nowadays Willis is under 180 cm.
Here next to Arnold and Stallone.
Click Here
I give to them:
Willis 179cm
Arnold 182cm
Stallone 174cm
They will not be more than that guys!
RisingForce said on 7/Jul/17
Somewhere in the 5'11" range peak, so it's pretty reasonable he claimed 6 feet. Very few his height wouldn't. Nowadays, I see him at 5'10.75" at worst. 179 still seems a bit low, but maybe by age 65 he will be.
Somewhere in the 5'11" range peak, so it's pretty reasonable he claimed 6 feet. Very few his height wouldn't. Nowadays, I see him at 5'10.75" at worst. 179 still seems a bit low, but maybe by age 65 he will be.
even said on 5/Jul/17
i think at 21 he was 181 cm
and now hes 179 cm
i think at 21 he was 181 cm
and now hes 179 cm
ok said on 5/Jul/17
Atm he looks 5"10
Atm he looks 5"10
RichardSpain said on 29/Jun/17
Yes !willis wasn't 6 foot I think he was a solid 181cm in his younger days. Nowadays he seems 179cm barefoot.
Yes !willis wasn't 6 foot I think he was a solid 181cm in his younger days. Nowadays he seems 179cm barefoot.
Phil said on 25/Jun/17
5 foot 11 . He is below 6 foot.
5 foot 11 . He is below 6 foot.
Ted said on 25/Jun/17
5' 11.5'' peak. Never anything over that.
5' 11.5'' peak. Never anything over that.
S.J.H said on 19/Jun/17
He claim 6'1 but more on 5'11 peak. Hollywood actors all claim 2-3' higher than barefoot untill rob nail their claiming height here. Justin Timerlake daring to claim up 6'2 and look no taller than 5'11 so Willis must be around 5'10.5 now.
He claim 6'1 but more on 5'11 peak. Hollywood actors all claim 2-3' higher than barefoot untill rob nail their claiming height here. Justin Timerlake daring to claim up 6'2 and look no taller than 5'11 so Willis must be around 5'10.5 now.
AlexItaly said on 17/Jun/17
He was about an inch shorter, not more, than 187 Damon Wayans in the 1991 masterpiece "the last boyscout". I think he was around 6 even when young, don't you think Rob?
He was about an inch shorter, not more, than 187 Damon Wayans in the 1991 masterpiece "the last boyscout". I think he was around 6 even when young, don't you think Rob?
Morningheight 181.5cm said on 4/Jun/17
I think he could max out at 181cm or 5'11 1/4 nowadays.
I think he could max out at 181cm or 5'11 1/4 nowadays.
Undertaker Frank said on 4/Jun/17
Mark your right his Wax figure looked tall i believe he was @ best 5ft 11 i have a friend who took a picture with him and he looked alittle shorter than me and im 5ft 11.5 His wax figure looked close to 6ft 2 in boots
Mark your right his Wax figure looked tall i believe he was @ best 5ft 11 i have a friend who took a picture with him and he looked alittle shorter than me and im 5ft 11.5 His wax figure looked close to 6ft 2 in boots
mark said on 25/May/17
his wax figure was pretty tall like around 6ft 1. idk maybe cuz of his steel boots but im six feet and he was my hight or a bit taller
his wax figure was pretty tall like around 6ft 1. idk maybe cuz of his steel boots but im six feet and he was my hight or a bit taller
RisingForce said on 13/May/17
Another photo of Bruce and Jai Courtney better: Click Here Bruce looks 181 cm, imo, but of course Courtney could be 184 cm, in which case, Bruce would be not much above 5'11". Bruce did seem an easy 5'11" in Red, imo. He was taller than Malkovich throughout the film, didn't look that much shorter than 184 cm Karl Urban and looked to have about a couple of inches on 5'9" James Remar. I still think he could be 5'11", but has probably been that height since Live Free or Die Hard seeing him with Timothy Olyphant and Justin Long. I think he was still more 181 cm at age 50. 5'10" peak is ridiculous, he's still easily taller than that. He wasn't far from his claim, in fact, virtually any man is going to claim 6 feet at Bruce's peak height.
Another photo of Bruce and Jai Courtney better: Click Here Bruce looks 181 cm, imo, but of course Courtney could be 184 cm, in which case, Bruce would be not much above 5'11". Bruce did seem an easy 5'11" in Red, imo. He was taller than Malkovich throughout the film, didn't look that much shorter than 184 cm Karl Urban and looked to have about a couple of inches on 5'9" James Remar. I still think he could be 5'11", but has probably been that height since Live Free or Die Hard seeing him with Timothy Olyphant and Justin Long. I think he was still more 181 cm at age 50. 5'10" peak is ridiculous, he's still easily taller than that. He wasn't far from his claim, in fact, virtually any man is going to claim 6 feet at Bruce's peak height.
Nope said on 30/Apr/17
He was about 3 inches shorter than 6' 1" David Schwimmer in his appearance on FRIENDS.
No taller than 5' 10" in his peak.
He was about 3 inches shorter than 6' 1" David Schwimmer in his appearance on FRIENDS.
No taller than 5' 10" in his peak.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Apr/17
I think 20-30 years ago he looked near 6ft.
I think 20-30 years ago he looked near 6ft.
Richardspain said on 24/Apr/17
He was solid 181/182cm guy not less and not more
Today perfect 180cm sure
He was solid 181/182cm guy not less and not more
Today perfect 180cm sure
Johnny said on 18/Apr/17
He looked 5ft 10.5 range with Karl Urban. But Urban had footwear advantage so 5ft 11 is the most for Willis now.
He looked 5ft 10.5 range with Karl Urban. But Urban had footwear advantage so 5ft 11 is the most for Willis now.
RisingForce said on 10/Apr/17
Seems like Bruce has lost most of his height since age 50, here he is at age 49 with 171-172 cm Cruise and 175 cm Jamie Foxx: Click Here He has a bit of a camera advantage over Cruise (but Tom has better posture) and better posture than Foxx, but it's hard to believe anything less than 181 cm, which is what he looked with George W. Bush, if Bush was 180 cm: Click Here (10:34 and last 10 seconds of video) 1/4" height loss by late 40s isn't uncommon. By 2012, he still seemed to be hanging on to 5'11" with 5'9" Joseph Gordon-Levitt: Click Here Of course, if he were still 182 cm, he'd be nearly 6'1" in most shoes and wouldn't look like this with his 5'10" wife in heels: Click Here Click Here Click Here To be clear, he's still obviously taller than her when she doesn't wear heels: Click Here The average guess seems a bit harsh, Bruce could possibly still scrape 5'11". 5'10.75" to a weak 5'11" is probably the best guess for his current height.
Seems like Bruce has lost most of his height since age 50, here he is at age 49 with 171-172 cm Cruise and 175 cm Jamie Foxx: Click Here He has a bit of a camera advantage over Cruise (but Tom has better posture) and better posture than Foxx, but it's hard to believe anything less than 181 cm, which is what he looked with George W. Bush, if Bush was 180 cm: Click Here (10:34 and last 10 seconds of video) 1/4" height loss by late 40s isn't uncommon. By 2012, he still seemed to be hanging on to 5'11" with 5'9" Joseph Gordon-Levitt: Click Here Of course, if he were still 182 cm, he'd be nearly 6'1" in most shoes and wouldn't look like this with his 5'10" wife in heels: Click Here Click Here Click Here To be clear, he's still obviously taller than her when she doesn't wear heels: Click Here The average guess seems a bit harsh, Bruce could possibly still scrape 5'11". 5'10.75" to a weak 5'11" is probably the best guess for his current height.
RisingForce said on 7/Apr/17
Bruce is more enigmatic then you'd think he'd be. 10 years ago, he struggled to look 2" taller than 5'9" Justin Long, yet around that same time, he was clearly taller than 179 cm Clooney and just a few years before I could easily buy 181 cm looking at Bruce with Jamie Foxx and Tom Cruise as well as 5'9.5" Matt Damon who he had an easy 1.5", maybe 2" in Ocean's Twelve. He can still look his apparent peak height of 5'11.5" if Jai Courtney is almost 6'1": Click Here yet that looks simultaneously true compared to Courtney here, but impossible with an admitted 182 cm Sebastian Koch in the same picture: Click Here Koch usually looks taller than Willis, but they can look pretty close: Click Here At his peak, he really did look taller than just a flat 5'11" in many comparisons. Rampage's 5'11.75" guess isn't impossible, but I wouldn't go any higher. Pretty reasonable claiming 6 feet.
Bruce is more enigmatic then you'd think he'd be. 10 years ago, he struggled to look 2" taller than 5'9" Justin Long, yet around that same time, he was clearly taller than 179 cm Clooney and just a few years before I could easily buy 181 cm looking at Bruce with Jamie Foxx and Tom Cruise as well as 5'9.5" Matt Damon who he had an easy 1.5", maybe 2" in Ocean's Twelve. He can still look his apparent peak height of 5'11.5" if Jai Courtney is almost 6'1": Click Here yet that looks simultaneously true compared to Courtney here, but impossible with an admitted 182 cm Sebastian Koch in the same picture: Click Here Koch usually looks taller than Willis, but they can look pretty close: Click Here At his peak, he really did look taller than just a flat 5'11" in many comparisons. Rampage's 5'11.75" guess isn't impossible, but I wouldn't go any higher. Pretty reasonable claiming 6 feet.
Really said on 7/Apr/17
Met him in Hawaii, on a good day I'm 5'8"1/2. Hah, it's funny he's that tall I must be 6'0" especially if I'm standing on a park bench. I'm average at best yet some how I was taller than he was back then. I must be using a different standard. I do not count my shoes. Obviously if I did I'd be five eleven or 6'0" and around 3 inches taller than him.
Met him in Hawaii, on a good day I'm 5'8"1/2. Hah, it's funny he's that tall I must be 6'0" especially if I'm standing on a park bench. I'm average at best yet some how I was taller than he was back then. I must be using a different standard. I do not count my shoes. Obviously if I did I'd be five eleven or 6'0" and around 3 inches taller than him.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Apr/17
I think he could actually have been 5ft11¾(182cm) and wore big shoes to look 6ft1 range.
I think he could actually have been 5ft11¾(182cm) and wore big shoes to look 6ft1 range.
Flyin said on 4/Apr/17
Yeah I can see that 180cm here and 181.5cm at peak. Rob have you amended this listing from a while ago?. I also think Clooney could be 179cm BTW.
Yeah I can see that 180cm here and 181.5cm at peak. Rob have you amended this listing from a while ago?. I also think Clooney could be 179cm BTW.
RichardSpain said on 4/Apr/17
I think Willis was 182m in peak, today maybe 181 or 180cm.
I think Willis was 182m in peak, today maybe 181 or 180cm.
mister_lennon said on 4/Apr/17
Maybe 182 out of bed at peak.
Maybe 182 out of bed at peak.
mister_lennon said on 4/Apr/17
I think that he was more in the 180-181 range at peak.
I think that he was more in the 180-181 range at peak.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Apr/17
Solid 182cm peak, no less
Solid 182cm peak, no less
Ramualdo said on 1/Apr/17
Peak was 178 cm
Now is 176 cm
Peak was 178 cm
Now is 176 cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Apr/17
I think a weak 6ft in the Moonlighting/Die Hard years
I think a weak 6ft in the Moonlighting/Die Hard years
berta said on 30/Mar/17
i think in willis case you cant judge his height from the movies becuase they try to make hom look 6 foot 1 in them. In real life photos i think 181 is a good shout and today probably 1 cm shorter
i think in willis case you cant judge his height from the movies becuase they try to make hom look 6 foot 1 in them. In real life photos i think 181 is a good shout and today probably 1 cm shorter
RisingForce said on 16/Mar/17
He could always give a 5'11" flat impression at times, even when young, but this listing is as good a guess as any since he made Don Johnson look about 5'8" on Miami Vice and here's an example of Bruce looking tall with 6' Tom Hanks: Click Here I do think he wasn't much above 5'11" by age 50 and certainly 5'11" max by age 55, though he seemed a bit taller than John Malkovich in the Red Films and premieres, but he can often look short when his 5'10" wife wears heels so 5'10.75" is probably the best guess currently.
He could always give a 5'11" flat impression at times, even when young, but this listing is as good a guess as any since he made Don Johnson look about 5'8" on Miami Vice and here's an example of Bruce looking tall with 6' Tom Hanks: Click Here I do think he wasn't much above 5'11" by age 50 and certainly 5'11" max by age 55, though he seemed a bit taller than John Malkovich in the Red Films and premieres, but he can often look short when his 5'10" wife wears heels so 5'10.75" is probably the best guess currently.
César said on 15/Mar/17
If you search in Google: Bruce Willis, Paul Reiser, "The Birth: Part 2", you can see a picture of BW barefoot, standing in front of PR (5.9ft 75)with shoes. Reiser was slightly taller. You can see that episode of Mad about you also, where Willis is escaping of a hospital without shoes.
If you search in Google: Bruce Willis, Paul Reiser, "The Birth: Part 2", you can see a picture of BW barefoot, standing in front of PR (5.9ft 75)with shoes. Reiser was slightly taller. You can see that episode of Mad about you also, where Willis is escaping of a hospital without shoes.
Jason said on 11/Mar/17
You have to remember that Stallone wears lifts alot. He looks a legit 5-11 to 6ft guy to me
You have to remember that Stallone wears lifts alot. He looks a legit 5-11 to 6ft guy to me
berta said on 9/Mar/17
under 180 at peak is to low and over 182 is to high. i think 181 could be better listing. today i dont know. maybe 179 range?
under 180 at peak is to low and over 182 is to high. i think 181 could be better listing. today i dont know. maybe 179 range?
josh jeffords said on 7/Mar/17
Said it before I'll say it again he is an average height man nothing more.
Great actor in the past no idea what happened to him but he has stunk lately.
Every 6 ft plus guy has towered him hes 5 10 .5 max peak.
I have a 5 11 .5-.75 buddy bad posture no tall person towers him even measures up well to very tall.
Said it before I'll say it again he is an average height man nothing more.
Great actor in the past no idea what happened to him but he has stunk lately.
Every 6 ft plus guy has towered him hes 5 10 .5 max peak.
I have a 5 11 .5-.75 buddy bad posture no tall person towers him even measures up well to very tall.
KH said on 2/Mar/17
Strong 5'11 in his prime. Travolta had about an inch on him in Pulp Fiction.
Strong 5'11 in his prime. Travolta had about an inch on him in Pulp Fiction.
Shaan said on 2/Mar/17
Peak: 179-180
Now: 177-178
Peak: 179-180
Now: 177-178
mister_lennon said on 20/Feb/17
For me:
Peak:180-181
Now:178-179
For me:
Peak:180-181
Now:178-179
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Feb/17
Peak: 182-183cm
Today: 180-181cm
Peak: 182-183cm
Today: 180-181cm
abcd said on 11/Feb/17
strong 179 now minimum 178
strong 179 now minimum 178
berta said on 6/Feb/17
thew more time goues on the samller i think he is. a guy like nicolas cage would have 2 cm on him easy at peak. arnold at about 185-86 was 5 cm taller also
thew more time goues on the samller i think he is. a guy like nicolas cage would have 2 cm on him easy at peak. arnold at about 185-86 was 5 cm taller also
Sandy Cowell said on 5/Feb/17
Oh no! I've fallen for some more bulls*** once again! I was told Bruce was 'well over 6ft' and although I disputed this, I didn't have the last say! Personally, I thought Bruce's peak height was 'about 6ft', so I win! 😣😝
Oh no! I've fallen for some more bulls*** once again! I was told Bruce was 'well over 6ft' and although I disputed this, I didn't have the last say! Personally, I thought Bruce's peak height was 'about 6ft', so I win! 😣😝
Normal. Tall guy said on 4/Feb/17
5'9 n thats all anything more is just ridiculous
5'9 n thats all anything more is just ridiculous
berta said on 31/Jan/17
what about peak 181 and current 179? and arnold peak 186 and current 181. stallone peak 176 current 173
what about peak 181 and current 179? and arnold peak 186 and current 181. stallone peak 176 current 173
S.J.H said on 20/Jan/17
Present bruce willis and david beckham is both 5'10.5 but a peak willis is strong 5'11
Present bruce willis and david beckham is both 5'10.5 but a peak willis is strong 5'11
berta said on 10/Jan/17
yeah somethin is wrong when matthew perry is listed 1 cm shorter and looks 1- 1,5 cm taller i think it should be bruce willis peak 181 and matthew perry strong 182 guy. Bruce looked like a 183 guy in movies at his peak but in interview he dont really looks mutch over 181 even back then and in his latest interviews he looked more in the 179 range. but i still think he can be 180
yeah somethin is wrong when matthew perry is listed 1 cm shorter and looks 1- 1,5 cm taller i think it should be bruce willis peak 181 and matthew perry strong 182 guy. Bruce looked like a 183 guy in movies at his peak but in interview he dont really looks mutch over 181 even back then and in his latest interviews he looked more in the 179 range. but i still think he can be 180
Mary said on 9/Jan/17
Definitely not six feet. I stood next to him, I'm a 5'11" woman, he was only a smudge talker than me in men's dress shoes, I was in flats. He has shrunk in his older age.
Definitely not six feet. I stood next to him, I'm a 5'11" woman, he was only a smudge talker than me in men's dress shoes, I was in flats. He has shrunk in his older age.
mister_lennon said on 2/Jan/17
Peak:180-181
Today:179-180
Peak:180-181
Today:179-180
Balrog said on 1/Jan/17
Is good to remember that Willis was on 'Friends' when he was 45. And he was shorter than 181cm listed Matthew Perry. So unless Perry is taller (who he might be but not by much) I doubt Willis at peak were over 5'11".
5'11" peak and 5'10.5" now heading to 5'10" flat.
Is good to remember that Willis was on 'Friends' when he was 45. And he was shorter than 181cm listed Matthew Perry. So unless Perry is taller (who he might be but not by much) I doubt Willis at peak were over 5'11".
5'11" peak and 5'10.5" now heading to 5'10" flat.
berta said on 31/Dec/16
woooooow people only gues him at 180 cm peak. i think that is too low for him. lowest i would argue is 181 and talles 182,5
woooooow people only gues him at 180 cm peak. i think that is too low for him. lowest i would argue is 181 and talles 182,5
berta said on 7/Dec/16
he is a guy that they make look bigger than he is in the movies i think he looked little taller than 6 footer william fichtner is armageddon. But in rally he was probably 182 and could fall litte below a guy like bill paxton was 1 cm taller in my eyes.these days he is 180-180,5 lost about 1,5 cm
he is a guy that they make look bigger than he is in the movies i think he looked little taller than 6 footer william fichtner is armageddon. But in rally he was probably 182 and could fall litte below a guy like bill paxton was 1 cm taller in my eyes.these days he is 180-180,5 lost about 1,5 cm
The truth said on 3/Dec/16
john smith said on 25/May/14
I met Bruce Willis in NYC about ten years ago, I'm 5 foot 2 inches and was about 3 inches taller than him,he's a real nice guy!)
Perfect example of the rubbish people claim on this site 😂
john smith said on 25/May/14
I met Bruce Willis in NYC about ten years ago, I'm 5 foot 2 inches and was about 3 inches taller than him,he's a real nice guy!)
Perfect example of the rubbish people claim on this site 😂
MJKoP said on 17/Nov/16
@Rampage(-_-_-)Clover
He was most likely only barefoot in the shots where you could actually see his bare feet.
@Rampage(-_-_-)Clover
He was most likely only barefoot in the shots where you could actually see his bare feet.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Nov/16
Rob, would you say it's fair that Die Hard isn't a great movie to gauge Willis's height since he was barefoot throughout most of it?
Click Here
Rickman (weak 6ft1) has 2in on him in this photo
Rob, would you say it's fair that Die Hard isn't a great movie to gauge Willis's height since he was barefoot throughout most of it?
Click Here
Rickman (weak 6ft1) has 2in on him in this photo
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Oct/16
Peak: 182-183cm
Today: 180cm
Peak: 182-183cm
Today: 180cm
Alexandra Stevens said on 20/Oct/16
I met him in 1989. I'm 5-7 and was a shade taller than Willis in heels. He's 5-9/5-10.
Most actors are shorter and thinner than you think they are. They look taller on screen because of how they are filmed and because they are ALL relatively small people. Guys who are actually 6 feet and muscular look enormous on film.
I met him in 1989. I'm 5-7 and was a shade taller than Willis in heels. He's 5-9/5-10.
Most actors are shorter and thinner than you think they are. They look taller on screen because of how they are filmed and because they are ALL relatively small people. Guys who are actually 6 feet and muscular look enormous on film.
j-c said on 13/Oct/16
Click Here
The man on the right is a french humorist and he is 1M76. I saw him and took a photo with him and this height is true.
Click Here
The man on the right is a french humorist and he is 1M76. I saw him and took a photo with him and this height is true.
Normal. Tall guy said on 11/Oct/16
5ft 9 at best n def wears lifts to squeeze in an inch or 2, he was same height as cybyl sheppard in moonlighting
5ft 9 at best n def wears lifts to squeeze in an inch or 2, he was same height as cybyl sheppard in moonlighting
davej said on 11/Oct/16
Solid 184 peak.
Solid 184 peak.
meezemaker said on 6/Oct/16
He looks more than 2 inches Shorter than dennis farina in Striking Distance.
Less than 5'11
He looks more than 2 inches Shorter than dennis farina in Striking Distance.
Less than 5'11
S.J.H said on 2/Oct/16
I don't think willis was as tall as people think he is. 5'11 peak and 5'10.5 nowadays. He just doesn't look taller than my dad (5'10.5) which i have watch enough much of his film
I don't think willis was as tall as people think he is. 5'11 peak and 5'10.5 nowadays. He just doesn't look taller than my dad (5'10.5) which i have watch enough much of his film
Dani said on 21/Sep/16
Saw him working at the italian vodafone spot. I am 176 and he had not less than 5-6cm advantage on me
Saw him working at the italian vodafone spot. I am 176 and he had not less than 5-6cm advantage on me
Tom said on 2/Sep/16
Looked about 5'11.5 on fifth element
Looked about 5'11.5 on fifth element
popcorn blizzard said on 15/Aug/16
Yeah I'd say 182cm, 190lbs in his prime.
Yeah I'd say 182cm, 190lbs in his prime.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Aug/16
Rob, how likely is 6ft for an 80's-90's Willis?
Editor Rob
Rob, how likely is 6ft for an 80's-90's Willis?
Editor Rob he could pass for it, although remember mamun met him in 90's and he didn't look a big six footer with him.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.