Add a Comment1743 comments
Average Guess (243 Votes)
6ft 6.92in (200.5cm)
6ft 6.92in (200.5cm)
Deathvalley99 said on 3/Feb/20
Sid and viscera next to the same guy.
Click Here
I don’t think Sid had an edge on viscera
Sid and viscera next to the same guy.
Click Here
I don’t think Sid had an edge on viscera
Deathvalley99 said on 26/Jan/20
How likely is to give viscera and sid the same height? In that pic they looks very similar and in that specific moment viscera maybe may seems slightly taller
How likely is to give viscera and sid the same height? In that pic they looks very similar and in that specific moment viscera maybe may seems slightly taller
Deathvalley99 said on 24/Jan/20
Rob, in this staredown
Click Here
Who give a taller impression between viscera and Sid ?
Editor Rob
Rob, in this staredown
Click Here
Who give a taller impression between viscera and Sid ?
Editor RobThose captures look very close, hard to tell sid or viscera as being taller against Nash
Deathvalley99 said on 19/Jan/20
Yes. Sycho sid has lost a lot of height by then. That pic is the proof that Sid today is hard to believe is 6ft6 flat barefoot. 6ft5.5 seems fair. What do you think
Yes. Sycho sid has lost a lot of height by then. That pic is the proof that Sid today is hard to believe is 6ft6 flat barefoot. 6ft5.5 seems fair. What do you think
Deathballey99 said on 18/Jan/20
@rob
I agree but I mean why the current height is 6ft6 flat, because judging by the pic, he’s shorter than that today barefoot
Editor Rob
@rob
I agree but I mean why the current height is 6ft6 flat, because judging by the pic, he’s shorter than that today barefoot
Editor RobToday 6ft 5.5 is possible
Deathvalley99 said on 17/Jan/20
Rob if in this pic
Click Here
Sycho sid is in footwear, why do you list him 6ft6 barefoot? If he’s 6ft6 barefoot, in shoes he should be at least 6ft6 3/4
Editor Rob
Rob if in this pic
Click Here
Sycho sid is in footwear, why do you list him 6ft6 barefoot? If he’s 6ft6 barefoot, in shoes he should be at least 6ft6 3/4
Editor RobHe might have lost height by then. Some wrestlers really do shrink earlier than normal folk.
Although it's 98% scripted, the injuries aren't.
Although it's 98% scripted, the injuries aren't.
Deathvalley99 said on 16/Jan/20
Rob, if you compare this 3 guys: baron corbin, viscera, Sid eudy (peak height), who could be the tallest and the lowest ?
Editor Rob
Rob, if you compare this 3 guys: baron corbin, viscera, Sid eudy (peak height), who could be the tallest and the lowest ?
Editor RobI find it hard to pick a tallest
James B said on 16/Dec/19
James B said on 13/Dec/19
Rob in Njps video below it’s interesting that Sid looks taller than undertaker........
Editor Rob
We've seen Sid seem to be at least Taker's height at times.
Rob maybe undertaker wasn’t as tall as 6’7,5 peak?
James B said on 13/Dec/19
Rob in Njps video below it’s interesting that Sid looks taller than undertaker........
Editor Rob
We've seen Sid seem to be at least Taker's height at times.
Rob maybe undertaker wasn’t as tall as 6’7,5 peak?
James B said on 13/Dec/19
Rob in Njps video below it’s interesting that Sid looks taller than undertaker........
Editor Rob
Rob in Njps video below it’s interesting that Sid looks taller than undertaker........
Editor RobWe've seen Sid seem to be at least Taker's height at times.
Njp said on 12/Dec/19
An old stand off between the Undertaker and Sid. Both men have almost identical boots so no footwear advantage and did looks a good inch taller than Taker here. Click Here
An old stand off between the Undertaker and Sid. Both men have almost identical boots so no footwear advantage and did looks a good inch taller than Taker here. Click Here
James B 172cm said on 3/Nov/19
rob too me he looked in the same height range as undertaker like 6'7.5.
seemed taller than braun strowman for sure
Editor Rob
rob too me he looked in the same height range as undertaker like 6'7.5.
seemed taller than braun strowman for sure
Editor RobFrom a couple of folk who seen him recently they think he is 'about' same as undertaker in person
James B said on 2/Nov/19
Rob do you agree that Sid is a good example of how huge a 6’6.75 guy can look when standing with good posture?
I mean looking back at old matches in the 90s he can give an even bigger impression than Tyson Fury. It could be could be sids posture or physique maybe?
Editor Rob
Rob do you agree that Sid is a good example of how huge a 6’6.75 guy can look when standing with good posture?
I mean looking back at old matches in the 90s he can give an even bigger impression than Tyson Fury. It could be could be sids posture or physique maybe?
Editor RobYeah back then he could look taller than he does in recent years, but then losing height by now was always going to happen.
James B said on 26/Oct/19
I think the full 6’7 peak is possible when you see him face of against undertaker and Kevin nash.
I think the full 6’7 peak is possible when you see him face of against undertaker and Kevin nash.
Bazza said on 24/Sep/19
Sid being solid 6'6 early 90s confirms Hogan in big boots was around 6'4 at that time. See the square off at the end of the 92 rumble.
Sid being solid 6'6 early 90s confirms Hogan in big boots was around 6'4 at that time. See the square off at the end of the 92 rumble.
Riccardo 5'7" said on 22/Sep/19
Sotiris Gravas
Thank you big man, but I would say that celebs height is lucky enough with you not with me. Since you started writing here I guess you did open many fanboys eyes on this site.
Sotiris Gravas
Thank you big man, but I would say that celebs height is lucky enough with you not with me. Since you started writing here I guess you did open many fanboys eyes on this site.
Riccardo 5'7" said on 22/Sep/19
Sotiris Gravas
Today I'm pretty confident Sid is about 6'5". And 6'6"1/2 for his peak sounds perfect but my doubts are about the height loss. We often take 1.5 inches away from these guys peaks, but are we so sure they lose this amount of height?
Because the way I see it Undertaker looked 6'6" range already during the American bad ass period. And Kane at 6'5.75/6'6" is really possible today.
I think he edged AliBaba by 1 cm, I'm not sure if Baba was 197 or 198 in that moment.
Sotiris Gravas
Today I'm pretty confident Sid is about 6'5". And 6'6"1/2 for his peak sounds perfect but my doubts are about the height loss. We often take 1.5 inches away from these guys peaks, but are we so sure they lose this amount of height?
Because the way I see it Undertaker looked 6'6" range already during the American bad ass period. And Kane at 6'5.75/6'6" is really possible today.
I think he edged AliBaba by 1 cm, I'm not sure if Baba was 197 or 198 in that moment.
Canson said on 21/Sep/19
Sotiris Gravas said on 7/Aug/19
Sid w/ Nash, and others (2019)... Click Here
Sid w/ (listed 5'9") DeAngelo Williams and (listed 6'6") Gary Barnidge, perhaps in sandals (2016):
Click Here
Barnidge might be as low as 6'5.5"; Google lists him as 6'5".
Williams measured 5’8 3/8 at the Senior Bowl
Sotiris Gravas said on 7/Aug/19
Sid w/ Nash, and others (2019)... Click Here
Sid w/ (listed 5'9") DeAngelo Williams and (listed 6'6") Gary Barnidge, perhaps in sandals (2016):
Click Here
Barnidge might be as low as 6'5.5"; Google lists him as 6'5".
Williams measured 5’8 3/8 at the Senior Bowl
edwards said on 13/Sep/19
@sotiris gravas
taker was aller han sid bu here in this particular staredownsid looked taller than taker
pause a 1:14 Click Here
@sotiris gravas
taker was aller han sid bu here in this particular staredownsid looked taller than taker
pause a 1:14 Click Here
Sotiris Gravas said on 12/Sep/19
@Riccardo
The most I would ever give these guys now is 6'5.5" for Taker, 6'6" for Kane, and 6'5" for Sid... basically 1 inch less than Editor Rob's listed heights. Maybe Taker and Sid were closer to 6'7" peak, but we'll never really know b/c these guys are said to have worn internal lifts.
As for Taker w/ Baba... there was probably a footwear advantage favoring Taker and Baba was probably dropping more height when that pic was taken. For all we know, maybe Taker was closer to his morning height there. All I know is that none of these guys are as tall now as ppl want them to be.
I love how Google lists them as 6'7", 6'10", and 7'0", LOL.
Remind me what you give these guys, then and now, dude...
Keep up the good work, Riccardo! CelebHeights is lucky to have you.
@Riccardo
The most I would ever give these guys now is 6'5.5" for Taker, 6'6" for Kane, and 6'5" for Sid... basically 1 inch less than Editor Rob's listed heights. Maybe Taker and Sid were closer to 6'7" peak, but we'll never really know b/c these guys are said to have worn internal lifts.
As for Taker w/ Baba... there was probably a footwear advantage favoring Taker and Baba was probably dropping more height when that pic was taken. For all we know, maybe Taker was closer to his morning height there. All I know is that none of these guys are as tall now as ppl want them to be.
I love how Google lists them as 6'7", 6'10", and 7'0", LOL.
Remind me what you give these guys, then and now, dude...
Keep up the good work, Riccardo! CelebHeights is lucky to have you.
Riccardo 5'7" said on 30/Aug/19
Sotiris Gravas@
I want ask you your real idea, without ppl ready to jump on you.
Taking in consideration all the material that you bring here every day I understood that your thought us this.
Undertaker 6'5.25 max now 6'6.5 max peak
Kane 6'5.5 now 6'7" peak
Sid 6'5 now 6'6.5 peak
Would not sounds crazy at all, but how you explain Ali Baba - undertaker Pic?
Sotiris Gravas@
I want ask you your real idea, without ppl ready to jump on you.
Taking in consideration all the material that you bring here every day I understood that your thought us this.
Undertaker 6'5.25 max now 6'6.5 max peak
Kane 6'5.5 now 6'7" peak
Sid 6'5 now 6'6.5 peak
Would not sounds crazy at all, but how you explain Ali Baba - undertaker Pic?
edwards said on 27/Aug/19
@roderick
Taker was always taller than sid,watch every staredown between them.
@roderick
Taker was always taller than sid,watch every staredown between them.
Sotiris Gravas said on 26/Aug/19
Poster Ben Bell's friend, Brendan Hood, w/ now 6'3.5" Adam Baldwin... Click Here
W/ Sid... Click Here
W/ 6'1.5" Eddie Hall... Click Here
Sid obviously isn't 6'6" now.
Poster Ben Bell's friend, Brendan Hood, w/ now 6'3.5" Adam Baldwin... Click Here
W/ Sid... Click Here
W/ 6'1.5" Eddie Hall... Click Here
Sid obviously isn't 6'6" now.
Xpac99 said on 14/Aug/19
Click Here
Sid wasn’t taller than taker in this segment.
If you pause at 2:33 you can see that taker was taller and sid is closer to the camera when the camera change the frame.
Minute 2:34
if you imagine taker one step closer to the camera, eh was taller than sid for sure.
Btw minute 2:49 after sid touch taker and taker return in standing straight position, again, he was taller by almost an inch
Click Here
Sid wasn’t taller than taker in this segment.
If you pause at 2:33 you can see that taker was taller and sid is closer to the camera when the camera change the frame.
Minute 2:34
if you imagine taker one step closer to the camera, eh was taller than sid for sure.
Btw minute 2:49 after sid touch taker and taker return in standing straight position, again, he was taller by almost an inch
Roderick said on 13/Aug/19
I can say that maybe Sid and Taker were the same height of 6'7". I would never say that Taker was actually taller than Sid, I would never.
I can say that maybe Sid and Taker were the same height of 6'7". I would never say that Taker was actually taller than Sid, I would never.
Pierre said on 13/Aug/19
Click Here = here i suppose Sid is wearing shoes then around 78 inches or just a little bit less in shoes( ~ 6"6') = then barefoot around 6"5' and peak a little bit more ?( when i go in the site of the pic they explain the reason of the mugshot then i think the marks are good)
Click Here = here i suppose Sid is wearing shoes then around 78 inches or just a little bit less in shoes( ~ 6"6') = then barefoot around 6"5' and peak a little bit more ?( when i go in the site of the pic they explain the reason of the mugshot then i think the marks are good)
edwards said on 9/Aug/19
@dan trojan
Agreed on everything you said,seid was never taller than taker,at times he may appear taller but that dosent mean he is taller.
@dan trojan
Agreed on everything you said,seid was never taller than taker,at times he may appear taller but that dosent mean he is taller.
Dan Trojan said on 7/Aug/19
Roderick in my opinion the only time side looked taller was in 1989 any other staredown taker looked taller look at the tops of their head not the eye level honestly that video from 89 is kinda deceiving yes sid looks taller i won't deny that but he was also wearing a mask and practically had an afro so it's really hard to tell
Roderick in my opinion the only time side looked taller was in 1989 any other staredown taker looked taller look at the tops of their head not the eye level honestly that video from 89 is kinda deceiving yes sid looks taller i won't deny that but he was also wearing a mask and practically had an afro so it's really hard to tell
Sotiris Gravas said on 7/Aug/19
Gary Barnidge w/ Quinn Ojinnaka (aka Moose), listed/billed 6'5"... Click Here
Video footage... Click Here
Gary Barnidge w/ Quinn Ojinnaka (aka Moose), listed/billed 6'5"... Click Here
Video footage... Click Here
Sotiris Gravas said on 7/Aug/19
Sid w/ Nash, and others (2019)... Click Here
Sid w/ (listed 5'9") DeAngelo Williams and (listed 6'6") Gary Barnidge, perhaps in sandals (2016):
Click Here
Barnidge might be as low as 6'5.5"; Google lists him as 6'5".
Sid w/ Nash, and others (2019)... Click Here
Sid w/ (listed 5'9") DeAngelo Williams and (listed 6'6") Gary Barnidge, perhaps in sandals (2016):
Click Here
Barnidge might be as low as 6'5.5"; Google lists him as 6'5".
Roderick said on 6/Aug/19
Undertaker was not taller than Sid, @edwards.
Post a clip or video of Sid looking taller than Undertaker, because I've actually looked and can only determine that they are the same height at best.
Undertaker was not taller than Sid, @edwards.
Post a clip or video of Sid looking taller than Undertaker, because I've actually looked and can only determine that they are the same height at best.
edwards said on 30/Jul/19
Dont know whether it was half inch difference or one inch difference,taker was always taller than sid at peak.
Dont know whether it was half inch difference or one inch difference,taker was always taller than sid at peak.
Riccardo 5'7 said on 24/Jul/19
@Rob Do you agree that some of these guys height loss has to do more with their way to stand, their posture, rather then a True height loss?
I mean it's so easy lose 4-5 cm? He looks 6'5 today
Editor Rob
@Rob Do you agree that some of these guys height loss has to do more with their way to stand, their posture, rather then a True height loss?
I mean it's so easy lose 4-5 cm? He looks 6'5 today
Editor RobSome will have worse posture than others, but I think a genuine amount have lost height through joint/disc damage
Xpac99 said on 21/Jul/19
Hard to believe that a peak taker was .75” taller than a peak Sid. Came on guy...
Click Here
Pause: 1:30
Pause: 1:32
Big rob taker was 1 inch taller in your opinion ?
Editor Rob
Hard to believe that a peak taker was .75” taller than a peak Sid. Came on guy...
Click Here
Pause: 1:30
Pause: 1:32
Big rob taker was 1 inch taller in your opinion ?
Editor RobHe could seem close in height to Sid...the question of whether either wore lifts is always up in the air though.
SeanR said on 19/Jul/19
Hard to believe that a peak taker was .75” taller than a peak Sid.
I’m gonna guess:
Taker peak: 6’7.25”
Sid peak: 6’7”
Hard to believe that a peak taker was .75” taller than a peak Sid.
I’m gonna guess:
Taker peak: 6’7.25”
Sid peak: 6’7”
Dan Trojan said on 14/Jul/19
Xpac99 that's a good video at first sid looked taller than you can see the undertaker stand straighter and they either looked the same height or undertaker was taller
Xpac99 that's a good video at first sid looked taller than you can see the undertaker stand straighter and they either looked the same height or undertaker was taller
Dan Trojan said on 14/Jul/19
Roderick the reason sid looks taller is because he has a higher eye level than undertaker pay attention to the tops of their heads and you will realize taker is taller
Roderick the reason sid looks taller is because he has a higher eye level than undertaker pay attention to the tops of their heads and you will realize taker is taller
Roderick said on 9/Jul/19
He looked taller than Undertaker in a few staredowns.... weird...
He would have to be 6'7.5" but I don't know if that's ridiculous or not. If he is as listed then Undertaker is 6'6.5" peak.
Or maybe Sid had better posture + footwear advantage... I would hope that's the case, if not then we are in a mess.
He looked taller than Undertaker in a few staredowns.... weird...
He would have to be 6'7.5" but I don't know if that's ridiculous or not. If he is as listed then Undertaker is 6'6.5" peak.
Or maybe Sid had better posture + footwear advantage... I would hope that's the case, if not then we are in a mess.
Heisenberg89 said on 28/Jun/19
@Rob Click Here
Do you think is a legit picture this one?
Editor Rob
@Rob Click Here
Do you think is a legit picture this one?
Editor RobIt's such a low camera that it is hard to tell exactly how tall he might be in footwear that moment.
Stormcoach said on 26/May/19
Ft6'6.75" peak. Ft 6'.6.25" now.
Ft6'6.75" peak. Ft 6'.6.25" now.
Xpac99 said on 25/May/19
Click Here
At this moment undertaker was taller than sid by an inch... taker 6ft 7 3/4 peak height is possible ??
Click Here
At this moment undertaker was taller than sid by an inch... taker 6ft 7 3/4 peak height is possible ??
Sotiris Gravas said on 25/May/19
Same fan w/ Sid and Kane... Click Here
Same fan w/ Khali... Click Here
6'4" Bob Sapp w/ 7'0" (not 7'2") Olivier Richters (2012)... Click Here
Sapp w/ Khali (2005)... Click Here
Richters w/ Satnam Singh (both 7'0")... Click Here
Satnam w/ 6'10" Khali... Click Here
Same fan w/ Sid and Kane... Click Here
Same fan w/ Khali... Click Here
6'4" Bob Sapp w/ 7'0" (not 7'2") Olivier Richters (2012)... Click Here
Sapp w/ Khali (2005)... Click Here
Richters w/ Satnam Singh (both 7'0")... Click Here
Satnam w/ 6'10" Khali... Click Here
Michael A. said on 11/May/19
I met him back in 1998 at an autograph signing in CT.
What struck me about him was that, when he was sitting down….he looked pretty normal sized, but when he stood up, he was huge.
In 1998, I don't think he would have really started shrinking, and my best guess as a 6'1" guy would have been about a little more than 6". So 6'7.5" would not have been unrealistic for Sid at peak.
I met him back in 1998 at an autograph signing in CT.
What struck me about him was that, when he was sitting down….he looked pretty normal sized, but when he stood up, he was huge.
In 1998, I don't think he would have really started shrinking, and my best guess as a 6'1" guy would have been about a little more than 6". So 6'7.5" would not have been unrealistic for Sid at peak.
Ben Bell said on 5/May/19
Ironman
At 6’3 you wouldn’t be eye to eye.
Don’t know if you’re UK or US based but there are plenty of shows all over the world where you can meet these guys.
It’s worth it, as Rob shows with his pics most aren’t a million miles away from their average billed height (obviously 7’4 Andre, 6’10.5 Taker and 6’8 Hogan are 2” to 4” out).
Ironman
At 6’3 you wouldn’t be eye to eye.
Don’t know if you’re UK or US based but there are plenty of shows all over the world where you can meet these guys.
It’s worth it, as Rob shows with his pics most aren’t a million miles away from their average billed height (obviously 7’4 Andre, 6’10.5 Taker and 6’8 Hogan are 2” to 4” out).
Ben Bell said on 5/May/19
Ironman
You’d have 0.5” on my 6’2.5 friend who had a pic with Sid.
Honestly he could still be 6’6, his posture was worse than Takers. I don’t think he’s as low as 6’5.
I have a friend who’s 6’5 who has perfect posture and I’d say Sid with bad posture was a little taller.
As I said earlier when you see him from a distance he doesn’t look super tall at all (I guess it depends on the size of people around him).
When you stand next to him however he’s still a very large man.
I wish he didn’t wear the cap.
If I had to guess I’d say barefoot and standing tall he could scrape 6’6. Felt like he was roughly 6” taller than me.
Like most wrestlers of his age he was physically very hunched and after a long day he didn’t seem to care about standing tall.
He was a really friendly, nice guy.
Ironman
You’d have 0.5” on my 6’2.5 friend who had a pic with Sid.
Honestly he could still be 6’6, his posture was worse than Takers. I don’t think he’s as low as 6’5.
I have a friend who’s 6’5 who has perfect posture and I’d say Sid with bad posture was a little taller.
As I said earlier when you see him from a distance he doesn’t look super tall at all (I guess it depends on the size of people around him).
When you stand next to him however he’s still a very large man.
I wish he didn’t wear the cap.
If I had to guess I’d say barefoot and standing tall he could scrape 6’6. Felt like he was roughly 6” taller than me.
Like most wrestlers of his age he was physically very hunched and after a long day he didn’t seem to care about standing tall.
He was a really friendly, nice guy.
Ironman092289 said on 4/May/19
Mr Rob do you think you should lower Sids listing? With all due respect, I believe 6'6 barefoot is impossible for Sid today. Even if Undertaker is still his said current listing of 6'6.5", that means Sid is max 6'5. One person even thought he looked 6'3, and I can see why. I wish I could meet these guys. I'm 6'3 barefoot (evening height) and I think I would be good at judging their heights. I wouldn't be surprised if I was eye-to-eye with Sid.
Mr Rob do you think you should lower Sids listing? With all due respect, I believe 6'6 barefoot is impossible for Sid today. Even if Undertaker is still his said current listing of 6'6.5", that means Sid is max 6'5. One person even thought he looked 6'3, and I can see why. I wish I could meet these guys. I'm 6'3 barefoot (evening height) and I think I would be good at judging their heights. I wouldn't be surprised if I was eye-to-eye with Sid.
Ben Bell said on 3/May/19
Sid looked between 6’5 and 6’6. Very hard to judge as he had physical proportions that made him look much shorter u TIL you stood next to him.
I expected him to be a little intimidating and and tense but he was far from it.
He instigated conversation and was super friendly, one of the most surprisingly friendly wrestlers I’ve ever met.
Absolute minimum I would go for Sid would be 6’5.
From a distance you could see his knees weren’t straight and his legs bowed in slightly, if you took this away he’d be 6’6.
Without injury and with youth on his side 6’7, maybe a little more.
I always thought 6’8 back in the day but I think 6’7 is more realistic.
If you ever get the chance to meet Sid it’s definitely worth it.
Sid looked between 6’5 and 6’6. Very hard to judge as he had physical proportions that made him look much shorter u TIL you stood next to him.
I expected him to be a little intimidating and and tense but he was far from it.
He instigated conversation and was super friendly, one of the most surprisingly friendly wrestlers I’ve ever met.
Absolute minimum I would go for Sid would be 6’5.
From a distance you could see his knees weren’t straight and his legs bowed in slightly, if you took this away he’d be 6’6.
Without injury and with youth on his side 6’7, maybe a little more.
I always thought 6’8 back in the day but I think 6’7 is more realistic.
If you ever get the chance to meet Sid it’s definitely worth it.
Lanny123 said on 2/May/19
Yes Undertaker looks 6'6 right now, but when he stands well for a measurement he can pull of little more than 6'6, Sid in other way is 6'5.5 at MOST right now.
Yes Undertaker looks 6'6 right now, but when he stands well for a measurement he can pull of little more than 6'6, Sid in other way is 6'5.5 at MOST right now.
Lanny123 said on 2/May/19
Ben Bell: Undertaker looked surley over Inch taller than Sid in this picture with you, and others from U.K
Click Here Sid and 6'2.5 Guy
Click Here Undertaker and 6'2.5 Guy, Undertaker got solid inch on Sid, or even more, he also got way longer forehead than Sid.
Editor Rob
Ben Bell: Undertaker looked surley over Inch taller than Sid in this picture with you, and others from U.K
Click Here Sid and 6'2.5 Guy
Click Here Undertaker and 6'2.5 Guy, Undertaker got solid inch on Sid, or even more, he also got way longer forehead than Sid.
Editor RobSid looks like he has lost at least 1-1.5 inches by now, but then the undertaker is in the same boat. He might be 6ft 6 flat today.
Ben Bell said on 29/Apr/19
Onepunchbob Didn’t see them near each other. They were similar heights. 6’5 1/2 to 6’6 at a guess. Sid had a worse posture. Taker looked really well and had good posture.
Sid and Hall both slouched. Hall had terrible posture.
Onepunchbob Didn’t see them near each other. They were similar heights. 6’5 1/2 to 6’6 at a guess. Sid had a worse posture. Taker looked really well and had good posture.
Sid and Hall both slouched. Hall had terrible posture.
Onepunchbob said on 29/Apr/19
Ben Ball...Did 'taker and Sid ever stand by each other? Who do you think was the taller?
Ben Ball...Did 'taker and Sid ever stand by each other? Who do you think was the taller?
James Brett 172cm said on 29/Apr/19
Ben Bell naturally these very tall wrestlers do lose more with age
Ben Bell naturally these very tall wrestlers do lose more with age
The Ben said on 29/Apr/19
6'2.5 Brendan and Sid
6'2.5 Brendan and Sid
Ben Bell said on 28/Apr/19
Sid and I today, I was 6’1.25 in my boots. 6’025 bare foot. I’d guess Sid had 5” on me roughly so 6’5.5 bare foot today I’d guess.
Click Here
Sid and I today, I was 6’1.25 in my boots. 6’025 bare foot. I’d guess Sid had 5” on me roughly so 6’5.5 bare foot today I’d guess.
Click Here
James Brett 172cm said on 15/Apr/19
Xpac99 said on 14/Apr/19
Who have the possibility to measure taller, strowman or sid ??
Sid looked taller in my opinion
Xpac99 said on 14/Apr/19
Who have the possibility to measure taller, strowman or sid ??
Sid looked taller in my opinion
Xpac99 said on 14/Apr/19
Who have the possibility to measure taller, strowman or sid ??
Who have the possibility to measure taller, strowman or sid ??
SeanR said on 8/Apr/19
Just can’t see Sid looking lower than 6’7” at peak. Looked no shorter than 2” next to Nash as late as 1999. And was at least 1.5” inches taller than Hulk Hogan in early nineties when Hogan was still around 6’5” range.
One could even argue Sid could have possibly been 6’7.25” considering he was near or at same height as peak Undertaker.
Just can’t see Sid looking lower than 6’7” at peak. Looked no shorter than 2” next to Nash as late as 1999. And was at least 1.5” inches taller than Hulk Hogan in early nineties when Hogan was still around 6’5” range.
One could even argue Sid could have possibly been 6’7.25” considering he was near or at same height as peak Undertaker.
James Brett 172cm said on 7/Apr/19
Rob Sid and Undertaker being very close does call into question if Taker was really the full 6’7 1/2?
Editor Rob
Rob Sid and Undertaker being very close does call into question if Taker was really the full 6’7 1/2?
Editor RobIt's certainly one case in which he looks nearer 6ft 7 than 7.5, and it's unlikely he lost half inch by then!
James Brett 172cm said on 4/Apr/19
Rob Sid look taller thanundertaker here back in 1989
Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob Sid look taller thanundertaker here back in 1989
Click Here
Editor RobYou could say they were very close, it's another case of Sid looking near 6ft 7, he might well have pulled off measuring near it at his peak!
James Brett 172cm said on 5/Mar/19
Braun can give a shorter impression than Sid
Braun can give a shorter impression than Sid
Xpac99 said on 2/Mar/19
Do you think is taller? Peak sid or braun strowman
Do you think is taller? Peak sid or braun strowman
DaveBern said on 26/Feb/19
Sid's leanness and posture made him look like 6'8'', but I think that's an illusion and he was more like an everyday full 6'6''. He always seemed taller than Hogan though. Deceptive.
Sid's leanness and posture made him look like 6'8'', but I think that's an illusion and he was more like an everyday full 6'6''. He always seemed taller than Hogan though. Deceptive.
Canson said on 21/Feb/19
@James172: he may ease into 6’5 range today but it’s likely only as low as Taker may drop 6’5.5-6’6 range. Peak Sid strong 6’6 however
@James172: he may ease into 6’5 range today but it’s likely only as low as Taker may drop 6’5.5-6’6 range. Peak Sid strong 6’6 however
James Brett 172cm said on 20/Feb/19
Well if he’s 6ft6 with shoes on he’s the tallest 6’5 guy I have ever seen.
Well if he’s 6ft6 with shoes on he’s the tallest 6’5 guy I have ever seen.
James Brett 172cm said on 18/Feb/19
Rob are you still unsure on 6ft6 3/4 for his peak?
Editor Rob
Rob are you still unsure on 6ft6 3/4 for his peak?
Editor RobIn his mugshot, I struggle to imagine him that tall, actually he could have shrunk a bit I suppose. I know he could look taller than Hogan by over an inch easily.
Xpac99 said on 16/Feb/19
Rob upgrade sid at 6ft 6 3/4
Rob upgrade sid at 6ft 6 3/4
Jordan87 said on 8/Feb/19
SId's Mug Shot him at 6'5.75" with SHoes on. He is not 6'6". He is a solid 6'5" guy. 6'6.5? No way !
SId's Mug Shot him at 6'5.75" with SHoes on. He is not 6'6". He is a solid 6'5" guy. 6'6.5? No way !
MikeV10 said on 3/Feb/19
Hey Rob , do you think its possible to upgrade Sid's peak height to 6'6,75. I think he was at least a 2,00m guy in Prime .
Editor Rob
Hey Rob , do you think its possible to upgrade Sid's peak height to 6'6,75. I think he was at least a 2,00m guy in Prime .
Editor RobI think it's probably more realistic, he could pull off looking near 6ft 7 half the time.
Canson said on 27/Jan/19
@184guy: he can even give off a 6’2” impression at times but because of his posture. Similar to undertaker looking 6’5 or less to some on his page but he still is near enough 6’6” to claim it at least In my opinion. I agree Hulk still looks 6’3” range standing straight. 6’3.5 is likely high for his low but 6’3.25 is decent. And I don’t completely rule out 6’2.75. Rob’s 6’3” listing is reasonable as he isn’t much higher than that if at all. But I would say height loss for someone 6’5 range at a low probably could be up to an inch with a long torso. Extreme lows could be less though
@184guy: he can even give off a 6’2” impression at times but because of his posture. Similar to undertaker looking 6’5 or less to some on his page but he still is near enough 6’6” to claim it at least In my opinion. I agree Hulk still looks 6’3” range standing straight. 6’3.5 is likely high for his low but 6’3.25 is decent. And I don’t completely rule out 6’2.75. Rob’s 6’3” listing is reasonable as he isn’t much higher than that if at all. But I would say height loss for someone 6’5 range at a low probably could be up to an inch with a long torso. Extreme lows could be less though
James Brett said on 23/Jan/19
Rob could have this horrific leg injury caused height loss for Sid?
Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob could have this horrific leg injury caused height loss for Sid?
Click Here
Editor RobIt could have effected his leg length a little.
184guy2 said on 23/Jan/19
@Canson
If he really was near 6'6 , like 6'5.75 so he could have been one of those guys with a daily loss of 1''+ . If you look some recents pics of his torso , seems to be pretty compact and shifted compared to 30 years ago . Nowdays he seems to be anywhere in the 6'2.5-6'3.25 range . Probably more 6'3 or over than under , but it depends on his posture .
@Canson
If he really was near 6'6 , like 6'5.75 so he could have been one of those guys with a daily loss of 1''+ . If you look some recents pics of his torso , seems to be pretty compact and shifted compared to 30 years ago . Nowdays he seems to be anywhere in the 6'2.5-6'3.25 range . Probably more 6'3 or over than under , but it depends on his posture .
Canson said on 22/Jan/19
@184guy: I think Hogan 6’7” was in boots. I don’t doubt 6’6” out of bed and 6’5.25 at a low perhaps even a stretch of 6’6.5 and 6’5.5 but I doubt ever 6’7”. Guys that size probably lose around 3/4” maybe a full inch best case. He definitely wasn’t less than 6’5” at his peak though and still looks 6’3” today. 6’3.5 is arguable at times as is 6’3,25
@184guy: I think Hogan 6’7” was in boots. I don’t doubt 6’6” out of bed and 6’5.25 at a low perhaps even a stretch of 6’6.5 and 6’5.5 but I doubt ever 6’7”. Guys that size probably lose around 3/4” maybe a full inch best case. He definitely wasn’t less than 6’5” at his peak though and still looks 6’3” today. 6’3.5 is arguable at times as is 6’3,25
James Brett said on 9/Jan/19
184guy2 said on 6/Jan/19
@John Eoberston
The very max that Hogan could have been was 6'6 ( probably 197cm) . 6'7 only maybe straight out of bed as he had a long spine and shattered it in the last decades.
Sid could have been 6'7 because he looked pretty close to Undertaker
Yes 6ft6.5 I thought looked too low with undertaker. I guess though Sid might have had better posture than Taker
184guy2 said on 6/Jan/19
@John Eoberston
The very max that Hogan could have been was 6'6 ( probably 197cm) . 6'7 only maybe straight out of bed as he had a long spine and shattered it in the last decades.
Sid could have been 6'7 because he looked pretty close to Undertaker
Yes 6ft6.5 I thought looked too low with undertaker. I guess though Sid might have had better posture than Taker
184guy2 said on 6/Jan/19
@John Eoberston
The very max that Hogan could have been was 6'6 ( probably 197cm) . 6'7 only maybe straight out of bed as he had a long spine and shattered it in the last decades.
Sid could have been 6'7 because he looked pretty close to Undertaker
@John Eoberston
The very max that Hogan could have been was 6'6 ( probably 197cm) . 6'7 only maybe straight out of bed as he had a long spine and shattered it in the last decades.
Sid could have been 6'7 because he looked pretty close to Undertaker
John Eobertson said on 6/Jan/19
He was 6ft8 at his peak. Hogan was 6ft6.5 flat foot at his peak. Remember when Hogan first faced Sid the hulkster already had lost height. Hogan may have even been 6ft7 in the late 70s before he ruined his spine with the leg drop and lifting Andre (said himself he felt a pop in that spot).
He was 6ft8 at his peak. Hogan was 6ft6.5 flat foot at his peak. Remember when Hogan first faced Sid the hulkster already had lost height. Hogan may have even been 6ft7 in the late 70s before he ruined his spine with the leg drop and lifting Andre (said himself he felt a pop in that spot).
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 31/Dec/18
Taker 6ft7.75 203cm sid 6ft7.25 201cm barefoot taker was billed 6ft10 he is taller.
Taker 6ft7.75 203cm sid 6ft7.25 201cm barefoot taker was billed 6ft10 he is taller.
Ozzy said on 27/Dec/18
In a video on youtube,an interview with the late Leon White (Vader). Stated Sid was a legitimate 6 foot 7 guy. I think he certainly was at his peak. Always stood tall. Given he was billed 6'9" most times with wrestling always adding 2" of course.
In a video on youtube,an interview with the late Leon White (Vader). Stated Sid was a legitimate 6 foot 7 guy. I think he certainly was at his peak. Always stood tall. Given he was billed 6'9" most times with wrestling always adding 2" of course.
James B 172cm said on 17/Oct/18
Yeah he did look about 6ft7 flat with undertaker I would say......... but Sid does always did have very good posture whereas perhaps Taker was standing more relaxed in there Wrestlemania stare down. Sid stood with better posture than Kevin Nash too making the height difference look smaller.
Yeah he did look about 6ft7 flat with undertaker I would say......... but Sid does always did have very good posture whereas perhaps Taker was standing more relaxed in there Wrestlemania stare down. Sid stood with better posture than Kevin Nash too making the height difference look smaller.
Bulan said on 7/Oct/18
Sid and Undertaker always looked around the same height, with either sometimes edging the other out. Assuming Sid wasn't wearing lifts, and Undertaker really was 6'7.5" (as listed here), Sid had to be at least 6'7".
Sid and Undertaker always looked around the same height, with either sometimes edging the other out. Assuming Sid wasn't wearing lifts, and Undertaker really was 6'7.5" (as listed here), Sid had to be at least 6'7".
Pdoggy said on 21/Sep/18
Well if that mug shot is accurate he must have worn some lifts in the ring.
Well if that mug shot is accurate he must have worn some lifts in the ring.
Pdoggy said on 17/Sep/18
Sorry Rob I'm going to have to disagree with you on this one always thought Sid was closer to 6'7" barefoot. 6'8" even in shoes not 6'6".5. Mamun pic says 6'8" That is why he measured up so well to Nash.
Sorry Rob I'm going to have to disagree with you on this one always thought Sid was closer to 6'7" barefoot. 6'8" even in shoes not 6'6".5. Mamun pic says 6'8" That is why he measured up so well to Nash.
RP said on 6/Sep/18
Nash looks bang on 6’9” to me with 6’7-1/2” Oliver Miller. Factoring in the slight lean/slouch
Nash looks bang on 6’9” to me with 6’7-1/2” Oliver Miller. Factoring in the slight lean/slouch
Sotiris Gravas said on 1/Sep/18
@RP Wow. "Small" world. Sorry about the wordplay; couldn't resist.
Here's a cool staredown between Sid and Nash from 1995... Click Here
Here Sid's lifting up his head a little, for obvious reasons... Click Here
Here's Kevin Nash w/ 6'7.5" barefoot Oliver Miller... Click Here
@RP Wow. "Small" world. Sorry about the wordplay; couldn't resist.
Here's a cool staredown between Sid and Nash from 1995... Click Here
Here Sid's lifting up his head a little, for obvious reasons... Click Here
Here's Kevin Nash w/ 6'7.5" barefoot Oliver Miller... Click Here
RP said on 29/Aug/18
Sotiris, I know Jim Justice...my father knows him personally. He worked for Jim & his father for about 20 years as a long haul truck driver for Blue Stone Farms. He’s a huge man. A legit 6’6”...but, over weight now. Probably has dipped under 6’6” by now I’m sure. I haven’t seen him myself in 9 going on 10 years. In 2008 he was still 6’6”.
Sotiris, I know Jim Justice...my father knows him personally. He worked for Jim & his father for about 20 years as a long haul truck driver for Blue Stone Farms. He’s a huge man. A legit 6’6”...but, over weight now. Probably has dipped under 6’6” by now I’m sure. I haven’t seen him myself in 9 going on 10 years. In 2008 he was still 6’6”.
Sotiris Gravas said on 24/Aug/18
I would like to see a staredown between Sid Justice and 6'6" West Virginia governor Jim Justice.
I would like to see a staredown between Sid Justice and 6'6" West Virginia governor Jim Justice.
Xpac99 said on 19/Jul/18
Rob Who is taller big Daddy V or sid eudy in your opinion?? (Peak height)
Editor Rob
Rob Who is taller big Daddy V or sid eudy in your opinion?? (Peak height)
Editor RobEither could be argued to edge the other out at times.
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 12/Jul/18
Sid 6ft8 203.2cm taker 6ft8 1/2 204.4cm barefoot. Peak.
Sid 6ft8 203.2cm taker 6ft8 1/2 204.4cm barefoot. Peak.
dicksock said on 30/Apr/18
I would say Sid was 6'7" at his peak and Hogan was 6'5.5". Today he is probably a weak 6'6".
I would say Sid was 6'7" at his peak and Hogan was 6'5.5". Today he is probably a weak 6'6".
dicksock said on 30/Apr/18
I would say Sid was 6'7" at his peak and Hogan was 6'5.5". Today he is probably a weak 6'6".
I would say Sid was 6'7" at his peak and Hogan was 6'5.5". Today he is probably a weak 6'6".
samson said on 20/Apr/18
Marco hogan was never 6'7 6'5 tops. Sid might have been 6'8 he looks 3 inches on hogan who is 6'5 tops
Marco hogan was never 6'7 6'5 tops. Sid might have been 6'8 he looks 3 inches on hogan who is 6'5 tops
Marco said on 20/Apr/18
Sid Is 6'9 And Hulk Hogan Is 6'7
Sid Is 6'9 And Hulk Hogan Is 6'7
Jim Hopper said on 15/Apr/18
Watch the wrestlemaina fight with Hogan. 3" on Hogan.
Watch the wrestlemaina fight with Hogan. 3" on Hogan.
Jim Hopper said on 14/Apr/18
Imo was never under 6-7 peak. Peak in truth close to 6-8
Imo was never under 6-7 peak. Peak in truth close to 6-8
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Apr/18
A real 6ft8 dude would hold his own with Nash. Taker always looked significantly shorter like minimum 2in...
A real 6ft8 dude would hold his own with Nash. Taker always looked significantly shorter like minimum 2in...
185 guy said on 2/Apr/18
When he stood next to 6'2'' health slater he looked about 5-7 '' taller than Slater , billing Sid as 199 for peak is a absolute foolishness and Rob i didn't expected that from you ( Don't take it personally , now lets get on height ) so he might be 6'9'' for peak and billing him as 198 right now can be witty
When he stood next to 6'2'' health slater he looked about 5-7 '' taller than Slater , billing Sid as 199 for peak is a absolute foolishness and Rob i didn't expected that from you ( Don't take it personally , now lets get on height ) so he might be 6'9'' for peak and billing him as 198 right now can be witty
Danimal said on 20/Mar/18
RP said on 17/Mar/18
Danimal is correct! This video I've never scene! The wide shots truly show you Sid was a longer/taller person! Foot wear looked the same too. Sid was an easy 0.25" taller... his shoulders were an inch taller "easy" !!! Sid being a 1/2" taller there could be logically argued.
After seeing that, assuming no lifts for Sid...
Peak Sid: 6'7.25/ 6'7.5"
Peak Taker: 6'7"
I think Sid was just over 6'7" and Taker was just under 6'7" at that time. People still think that Taker was 6'8". He really wasn't.
RP said on 17/Mar/18
Danimal is correct! This video I've never scene! The wide shots truly show you Sid was a longer/taller person! Foot wear looked the same too. Sid was an easy 0.25" taller... his shoulders were an inch taller "easy" !!! Sid being a 1/2" taller there could be logically argued.
After seeing that, assuming no lifts for Sid...
Peak Sid: 6'7.25/ 6'7.5"
Peak Taker: 6'7"
I think Sid was just over 6'7" and Taker was just under 6'7" at that time. People still think that Taker was 6'8". He really wasn't.
RP said on 17/Mar/18
Danimal is correct! This video I've never scene! The wide shots truly show you Sid was a longer/taller person! Foot wear looked the same too. Sid was an easy 0.25" taller... his shoulders were an inch taller "easy" !!! Sid being a 1/2" taller there could be logically argued.
After seeing that, assuming no lifts for Sid...
Peak Sid: 6'7.25/ 6'7.5"
Peak Taker: 6'7"
Danimal is correct! This video I've never scene! The wide shots truly show you Sid was a longer/taller person! Foot wear looked the same too. Sid was an easy 0.25" taller... his shoulders were an inch taller "easy" !!! Sid being a 1/2" taller there could be logically argued.
After seeing that, assuming no lifts for Sid...
Peak Sid: 6'7.25/ 6'7.5"
Peak Taker: 6'7"
RP said on 10/Mar/18
MS is right !! You can't be 0.75" to 1" shorter than someone & have your nose be taller than their's in a staredown ! Impossible for Taker 6'7.5" & Sid 6'6.5, Rob??? Both men were 6'7.25" or 6'7" ...Most likely, both men 6'7"...IMO
MS is right !! You can't be 0.75" to 1" shorter than someone & have your nose be taller than their's in a staredown ! Impossible for Taker 6'7.5" & Sid 6'6.5, Rob??? Both men were 6'7.25" or 6'7" ...Most likely, both men 6'7"...IMO
MS said on 4/Mar/18
Sid at Takers´s height (Sid is a hair nearer at the camera):
Click Here 6-6,5 peak height for Sid is definetly too low!
Sid at Takers´s height (Sid is a hair nearer at the camera):
Click Here 6-6,5 peak height for Sid is definetly too low!
James B 170.8cm said on 19/Feb/18
height crazy- hogan was not 6"6 in the early 90s more like 6ft5 range.
he had lost height by that point
height crazy- hogan was not 6"6 in the early 90s more like 6ft5 range.
he had lost height by that point
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 18/Feb/18
Junior31 said on 24/Jan/18
Honestly just watched old footage of him and hulk hogan teaming against Ric Flair and the undertaker. Hogan and sid before the match are standing side by side during an interview and sid is noticeably taller then hogan to the tune of about 2 inches. I took a look at there footwear. I want to say that sids black boots were maybe a tad chunkier then Hogan’s yellow but not by much of any at all. If hogan was in fact 6’6 sid looked 6’8. Now something has to give because there peak heights on this site are a half inch difference. Can’t be. I’m gonna say Sid was 6’7.25-6’7.5 peak and hogan between 6’5.5 and 6’6.
***********************************************************************************
Logic sense, so regarding eveningheight Hogan peak was 6´5.25"-6´5.5".
There´s no reason he lost anything regarding eveningheigt in 1991-1992, IF then only a fraction...
Sid looked up to 2" taller, but had a bit more footwear, so the barefoot gap was 1.5"-1.75".
Hogan wasn´t under 6´5" eveningheight in 1991-92, so Rob has Sid at the lowest possible 6´6.5".
So being very fair to Hogan and give him 0.25" eveningheightloss in 1991, makes the gap between their peak eveningheight still at least 1.25".
So imo the logic listings are
A: Sid 6´7.25" / Hogan 6´6"
B: Sid 6´7" / Hogan 6´5.75"
C: Sid 6´6.75" / Hogan 6´5.5"
D: Sid 6´6.5" / Hogan 6´5.25"
I´d go with C and 15% chance of B
Junior31 said on 24/Jan/18
Honestly just watched old footage of him and hulk hogan teaming against Ric Flair and the undertaker. Hogan and sid before the match are standing side by side during an interview and sid is noticeably taller then hogan to the tune of about 2 inches. I took a look at there footwear. I want to say that sids black boots were maybe a tad chunkier then Hogan’s yellow but not by much of any at all. If hogan was in fact 6’6 sid looked 6’8. Now something has to give because there peak heights on this site are a half inch difference. Can’t be. I’m gonna say Sid was 6’7.25-6’7.5 peak and hogan between 6’5.5 and 6’6.
***********************************************************************************
Logic sense, so regarding eveningheight Hogan peak was 6´5.25"-6´5.5".
There´s no reason he lost anything regarding eveningheigt in 1991-1992, IF then only a fraction...
Sid looked up to 2" taller, but had a bit more footwear, so the barefoot gap was 1.5"-1.75".
Hogan wasn´t under 6´5" eveningheight in 1991-92, so Rob has Sid at the lowest possible 6´6.5".
So being very fair to Hogan and give him 0.25" eveningheightloss in 1991, makes the gap between their peak eveningheight still at least 1.25".
So imo the logic listings are
A: Sid 6´7.25" / Hogan 6´6"
B: Sid 6´7" / Hogan 6´5.75"
C: Sid 6´6.75" / Hogan 6´5.5"
D: Sid 6´6.5" / Hogan 6´5.25"
I´d go with C and 15% chance of B
RP said on 10/Feb/18
Junior31 is correct! Peak Sid & Peak Taker were basically the exact same height! 6'7" to 6'7-1/4" & peak Hogan was 6'5-1/2" to 6'5-3/4". However, Hulk Hogan was not at his peak in 1992...'92 Hogan was 6'5-1/4" IMO @ best...6'5" to 6'5-1/4" ...I do believe that from 1984 to 1992...Hogan lost a 1/2" of height ...just my opinion.
Junior31 is correct! Peak Sid & Peak Taker were basically the exact same height! 6'7" to 6'7-1/4" & peak Hogan was 6'5-1/2" to 6'5-3/4". However, Hulk Hogan was not at his peak in 1992...'92 Hogan was 6'5-1/4" IMO @ best...6'5" to 6'5-1/4" ...I do believe that from 1984 to 1992...Hogan lost a 1/2" of height ...just my opinion.
M.E said on 30/Jan/18
looked couple inches taller than Hogan
looked couple inches taller than Hogan
Junior31 said on 24/Jan/18
Honestly just watched old footage of him and hulk hogan teaming against Ric Flair and the undertaker. Hogan and sid before the match are standing side by side during an interview and sid is noticeably taller then hogan to the tune of about 2 inches. I took a look at there footwear. I want to say that sids black boots were maybe a tad chunkier then Hogan’s yellow but not by much of any at all. If hogan was in fact 6’6 sid looked 6’8. Now something has to give because there peak heights on this site are a half inch difference. Can’t be. I’m gonna say Sid was 6’7.25-6’7.5 peak and hogan between 6’5.5 and 6’6.
Honestly just watched old footage of him and hulk hogan teaming against Ric Flair and the undertaker. Hogan and sid before the match are standing side by side during an interview and sid is noticeably taller then hogan to the tune of about 2 inches. I took a look at there footwear. I want to say that sids black boots were maybe a tad chunkier then Hogan’s yellow but not by much of any at all. If hogan was in fact 6’6 sid looked 6’8. Now something has to give because there peak heights on this site are a half inch difference. Can’t be. I’m gonna say Sid was 6’7.25-6’7.5 peak and hogan between 6’5.5 and 6’6.
mike said on 30/Dec/17
After some research I now believe sid was the same height as taker 6'7" maybe 6'8" tops, 2 inches taller than Hulk Hogan.It,s hard to be certain due to the footwear lifts etc..
After some research I now believe sid was the same height as taker 6'7" maybe 6'8" tops, 2 inches taller than Hulk Hogan.It,s hard to be certain due to the footwear lifts etc..
mike said on 12/Dec/17
Sid Eudy was about 2 inches shorter than 6'11" Kevin nash,6'9" for sid.
Sid Eudy was about 2 inches shorter than 6'11" Kevin nash,6'9" for sid.
Johno said on 22/Nov/17
Slightly shorter than Taker, probably 6'5.5-6'6
Slightly shorter than Taker, probably 6'5.5-6'6
Anonymous said on 5/Nov/17
Younger days in the 90s he was definitely about 6 Foot 8/6 Foot 9 but he is now 56 and not wrestled in years but bearing in mind his wwe character was sycho he had a lot of scrapes so my guess is he is about 6 Foot 6/6 Foot 7 now!!!
Younger days in the 90s he was definitely about 6 Foot 8/6 Foot 9 but he is now 56 and not wrestled in years but bearing in mind his wwe character was sycho he had a lot of scrapes so my guess is he is about 6 Foot 6/6 Foot 7 now!!!
Jordan87 said on 2/Nov/17
Ceej,
No, He eye level was higher than Takers, but the top of his Head was Below Takers. His mug shot also showed him at 6'5, and He didn't shrink 3", and if you below that or believe he was over 6'5 in his mug shot you should make sure you sent your list to santa this year.
Ceej,
No, He eye level was higher than Takers, but the top of his Head was Below Takers. His mug shot also showed him at 6'5, and He didn't shrink 3", and if you below that or believe he was over 6'5 in his mug shot you should make sure you sent your list to santa this year.
Ceej said on 1/Nov/17
His peak height is way too low. He was taller than the Undertaker in the 1990s. I mean, there is no dispute. He was quite obviously taller than the Undertaker in 1991-1993. His peak height was over 6’8.
His peak height is way too low. He was taller than the Undertaker in the 1990s. I mean, there is no dispute. He was quite obviously taller than the Undertaker in 1991-1993. His peak height was over 6’8.
Sam said on 12/Sep/17
Sid was 6'8 early in his career today he is 6'6 1/2
Sid was 6'8 early in his career today he is 6'6 1/2
Chris said on 25/Aug/17
There was little difference between Sid and Taker. I'd say peak Sid had to be 6'7" if Taker was 6'7 1/2". Today, 6'6" seems on the mark.
There was little difference between Sid and Taker. I'd say peak Sid had to be 6'7" if Taker was 6'7 1/2". Today, 6'6" seems on the mark.
Supermanfan380 said on 14/Aug/17
I recall an interview with Kevin Nash, I'm sure many here are familiar with, where Nash mentioned when he first realized Wrestling was a work. He said it was when he saw Hulk Hogan in person walk right past him at an event, in 1989 or 1990, and that at that time hogan was only 6'4". Nash's words. Now obviously that was afternoon etc... ok Sid was a couple inches over hogan. 6'5.5" - 6'6" afternoon conservatively. About the same as contributor AliBaba. That is congruent with other of the conservative height estimates, almost as tall as UT.
By the way, Sid has a bigger frame than UT, height isn't everything. If you notice in stare downs Sid's shoulder height is taller. His skull is simply slightly wider and shorter than Undetaker's. UT may have a longer neck as well. The reality is a real 6'6" is a man tower.
I recall an interview with Kevin Nash, I'm sure many here are familiar with, where Nash mentioned when he first realized Wrestling was a work. He said it was when he saw Hulk Hogan in person walk right past him at an event, in 1989 or 1990, and that at that time hogan was only 6'4". Nash's words. Now obviously that was afternoon etc... ok Sid was a couple inches over hogan. 6'5.5" - 6'6" afternoon conservatively. About the same as contributor AliBaba. That is congruent with other of the conservative height estimates, almost as tall as UT.
By the way, Sid has a bigger frame than UT, height isn't everything. If you notice in stare downs Sid's shoulder height is taller. His skull is simply slightly wider and shorter than Undetaker's. UT may have a longer neck as well. The reality is a real 6'6" is a man tower.
dewie said on 11/Aug/17
Sid 6ft7 taker 6ft8 barefoot
Sid 6ft7 taker 6ft8 barefoot
even said on 7/Jul/17
peak 6'7
right now 6'6
peak 6'7
right now 6'6
Dill pickles said on 2/Jul/17
Same height as taker just slightly under kane
Same height as taker just slightly under kane
Guanzo said on 8/Jun/17
Taller than Undertaker
Taller than Undertaker
Slim said on 15/May/17
Someone please tell me how to post pics on here from an iPhone. I have pictures with a true 6'7, 6'8 and 6'6.5 men. I work with them and one is the boxer Deontay Wilder. So... The Ben, those guys you talk about aren't 6'5 or 6'6 if you say they aren't that tall. Anyone who is 6'5 or 6'6 is VERY tall. I am 6'1.5.
Someone please tell me how to post pics on here from an iPhone. I have pictures with a true 6'7, 6'8 and 6'6.5 men. I work with them and one is the boxer Deontay Wilder. So... The Ben, those guys you talk about aren't 6'5 or 6'6 if you say they aren't that tall. Anyone who is 6'5 or 6'6 is VERY tall. I am 6'1.5.
Markus said on 14/Apr/17
Sid with Mammun (Sid at 35, 90ies): Click Here
Sid compared with 6-7 to 6-8 Glen Jacobs (Sid in the 90ies): Click Here
I lost 5 mm up to the age of 30 without hard training and without wrestling. Sid, at the
age of 31, was about 2+" taller than a 6-5+ Hogan at Wrestlemania 8 (1992). Thus, Sid´s
peak height was clearly over 6-7, about 6-7,5 or more!
Sid with Mammun (Sid at 35, 90ies): Click Here
Sid compared with 6-7 to 6-8 Glen Jacobs (Sid in the 90ies): Click Here
I lost 5 mm up to the age of 30 without hard training and without wrestling. Sid, at the
age of 31, was about 2+" taller than a 6-5+ Hogan at Wrestlemania 8 (1992). Thus, Sid´s
peak height was clearly over 6-7, about 6-7,5 or more!
heightchecker34 said on 10/Apr/17
Prime Sid Vicious was simply put... huge! You would be already considered very tall just by being in the 6'6 range, but then imagine adding all that muscle with that frame, and you are a literal god! I doubt a lot of people would mess with you... especially not with the "Psycho Sid" gimmick! I see a lot of people have him listed in his prime, around the 6'7 area... he easily wakes up over the 200 cm mark, but I don't think he maintains it throughout the day. I think 6'6.5" is precisely where he belongs. Nothing wrong with it, not like the majority of people could tell the difference anyhow. In the face down with Undertaker, he is wearing huge boots and really trying to stand as tall as possible, while Undertaker is maintaining a relaxed posture. There is no more than an inch between them, which proves Undertaker was 6'7.5" at his peak. There are a lot of 6'7 billed wrestlers who in fact are usually in the 6'5-6'6 range, at least Sid is close... Not that I would tell him to his face.. ( I at least have twice the brain! haha)
Prime Sid Vicious was simply put... huge! You would be already considered very tall just by being in the 6'6 range, but then imagine adding all that muscle with that frame, and you are a literal god! I doubt a lot of people would mess with you... especially not with the "Psycho Sid" gimmick! I see a lot of people have him listed in his prime, around the 6'7 area... he easily wakes up over the 200 cm mark, but I don't think he maintains it throughout the day. I think 6'6.5" is precisely where he belongs. Nothing wrong with it, not like the majority of people could tell the difference anyhow. In the face down with Undertaker, he is wearing huge boots and really trying to stand as tall as possible, while Undertaker is maintaining a relaxed posture. There is no more than an inch between them, which proves Undertaker was 6'7.5" at his peak. There are a lot of 6'7 billed wrestlers who in fact are usually in the 6'5-6'6 range, at least Sid is close... Not that I would tell him to his face.. ( I at least have twice the brain! haha)
dewie said on 4/Mar/17
Sid 6ft7.5 202cm taker 6ft8.5 204cm barefoot
Sid 6ft7.5 202cm taker 6ft8.5 204cm barefoot
The Ben said on 3/Mar/17
He's in the U.K. Next weekend (if he shows). I'll get s pick with him, peak height barefoot I go 6'7, today he looks 6'6 ish.
I work with two guys who are 6'6 and 6'5.5 respectively and they really don't seem that tall.
I just can't see Sid looking as short as they do.
If he turns up I'll get a pic and post it.
I'm 6'.05 currently.
He's in the U.K. Next weekend (if he shows). I'll get s pick with him, peak height barefoot I go 6'7, today he looks 6'6 ish.
I work with two guys who are 6'6 and 6'5.5 respectively and they really don't seem that tall.
I just can't see Sid looking as short as they do.
If he turns up I'll get a pic and post it.
I'm 6'.05 currently.
Kane and Abel said on 18/Feb/17
6'7 Peak for Sure, Rob?
6'7 Peak for Sure, Rob?
GS1981 said on 13/Feb/17
has anyone seen Sid Eudy stood next to Glen Jacobs? that would be another interesting comparison.
has anyone seen Sid Eudy stood next to Glen Jacobs? that would be another interesting comparison.
GS1981 said on 13/Feb/17
He was always noticiabley shorter than Kevin Nash, and a fraction shorter than the Undertaker, i think 6ft 7 peak with lifted boots, 6ft 6 now.
He was always noticiabley shorter than Kevin Nash, and a fraction shorter than the Undertaker, i think 6ft 7 peak with lifted boots, 6ft 6 now.
Steve said on 18/Jan/17
Least 6ft 7in to 6ft 7.5in peak. Can't see Sid under that peak. 199cm too low for peak height.
Least 6ft 7in to 6ft 7.5in peak. Can't see Sid under that peak. 199cm too low for peak height.
James B said on 5/Jan/17
More width? Sid was a freaking muscular monster.
More width? Sid was a freaking muscular monster.
James B said on 4/Jan/17
Rob do you agree that it would be impossible to tell apart a peak Sid from Braun Strowman?
Editor Rob
Rob do you agree that it would be impossible to tell apart a peak Sid from Braun Strowman?
Editor Rob I think Braun has more width and maybe therefore could in fact look similar.
day day said on 30/Dec/16
Hogan was 2" shorter in 92 so sid had to be 6'7 or 6'7.5"
Hogan was 2" shorter in 92 so sid had to be 6'7 or 6'7.5"
Sean said on 29/Dec/16
Rob, any possibility Sid's peak is 6'7"? Just not convinced he was as low as 6'6.5".
Rob, any possibility Sid's peak is 6'7"? Just not convinced he was as low as 6'6.5".
Danimal said on 29/Dec/16
He was 6'7" peak.
He was 6'7" peak.
The Ben said on 29/Dec/16
6'7 peak.
6'6 today.
It's obvious looking at a newer videos and photos that he's lost height in his upper back.
Im not sure if his leg snapping would effect his height in any way.
6'7 peak.
6'6 today.
It's obvious looking at a newer videos and photos that he's lost height in his upper back.
Im not sure if his leg snapping would effect his height in any way.
Shuvayu said on 29/Dec/16
There was this scissors incident between Sid and Arn, & I remember comments from various wrestlers including Vader who said Sid was 6'7"
There was this scissors incident between Sid and Arn, & I remember comments from various wrestlers including Vader who said Sid was 6'7"
Guyster said on 4/Dec/16
SID was always in the 6'7 range peak, current is 6'6, was always 3 inches below Nash, peak and current.
SID was always in the 6'7 range peak, current is 6'6, was always 3 inches below Nash, peak and current.
dewie said on 2/Dec/16
Taker is taller 203cm sid 201cm barefoot peak height
Taker is taller 203cm sid 201cm barefoot peak height
jtower27 said on 30/Nov/16
Sid was probably half an inch taller than Undertaker who was taller than Hogan.
Sid was probably half an inch taller than Undertaker who was taller than Hogan.
Typhoon said on 28/Nov/16
Sid was 201 cm peak.
Sid was 201 cm peak.
James B said on 24/Nov/16
Hogan was 6'6 tops in 92
Hogan was 6'6 tops in 92
Frank R said on 22/Nov/16
Back in 1992 in his role as a WWE referee, Sid "Justice" Eudy appeared to be 1 to 2 inches taller than Hulk Hogan who was a legit 6'7" in 1992. Since Hogan's back problems didn't become serious until the mid-2000s, it stands to reason that Sid was probably between 6'8" and 6'9" in 1992. Sid snapped his leg in 2001, and he's lost even more height with age. I'd estimate his height today at close to 6'7".
Back in 1992 in his role as a WWE referee, Sid "Justice" Eudy appeared to be 1 to 2 inches taller than Hulk Hogan who was a legit 6'7" in 1992. Since Hogan's back problems didn't become serious until the mid-2000s, it stands to reason that Sid was probably between 6'8" and 6'9" in 1992. Sid snapped his leg in 2001, and he's lost even more height with age. I'd estimate his height today at close to 6'7".
dewie said on 18/Nov/16
Taker 6ft7 sid 6ft6 peak height barefoot
Taker 6ft7 sid 6ft6 peak height barefoot
Attitude said on 15/Nov/16
On Flair's podcast, Kevin Sullivan claimed prime Sid was 6'6" and Benoit as 5'7". So there you go.
Click Here
On Flair's podcast, Kevin Sullivan claimed prime Sid was 6'6" and Benoit as 5'7". So there you go.
Click Here
@HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 6/Nov/16
Click Here
peak Taker****6ft7in-6ft7.25in
peak Sid******6ft6.5in-6ft6.75in
peak Hall*****6ft4.75in-6ft5in
1992 Hogan****6ft4.75in-6ft5in peak 6ft5.25in-6ft5.5in
Click Here
peak Taker****6ft7in-6ft7.25in
peak Sid******6ft6.5in-6ft6.75in
peak Hall*****6ft4.75in-6ft5in
1992 Hogan****6ft4.75in-6ft5in peak 6ft5.25in-6ft5.5in
dewie said on 17/Oct/16
Taker 6ft8.5 sid 6ft7.5 barefoot
Taker 6ft8.5 sid 6ft7.5 barefoot
joe### said on 15/Oct/16
Rob,over 6´6.5?
Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob,over 6´6.5?
Click Here
Editor Robover 6ft 6, but a full 6ft 7 I'm not so sure on.
James B said on 15/Oct/16
Yeah I think sids posture can make him look 6'7
Yeah I think sids posture can make him look 6'7
Powerhouse said on 14/Oct/16
@James B At the time as a 10 year old kid i didn't pay attention to his height, It was looking at the picture which i hadn't seen in many years and comparing his height to my fathers height in the picture as they are standing right next to each other, my father is 5'7.5 and in the photo the top of his head looks right around Sid's shoulder, it looks like a foot difference . But Sid may be standing with better posture, and pictures can at times be deceiving. I wouldn't guess him under 6'7 though in any case.
@James B At the time as a 10 year old kid i didn't pay attention to his height, It was looking at the picture which i hadn't seen in many years and comparing his height to my fathers height in the picture as they are standing right next to each other, my father is 5'7.5 and in the photo the top of his head looks right around Sid's shoulder, it looks like a foot difference . But Sid may be standing with better posture, and pictures can at times be deceiving. I wouldn't guess him under 6'7 though in any case.
James B said on 13/Oct/16
To be fair though I can't get head my head around Sid being 6'6 range and Nash potentially 6'10 peak.
To be fair though I can't get head my head around Sid being 6'6 range and Nash potentially 6'10 peak.
James B said on 13/Oct/16
rob do you think poster powerhouse and the majority of people who vote for him to be 6'7 peak underestimates how huge a 6'6.5 guy with his build and posture can look?
Editor Rob
rob do you think poster powerhouse and the majority of people who vote for him to be 6'7 peak underestimates how huge a 6'6.5 guy with his build and posture can look?
Editor Rob considering a guy like Cudmore says he measured 6ft 6.5, it's a massive height in person from the average 5ft 9 guy's perspective.
Powerhouse said on 12/Oct/16
I met him at an autograph signing when i was a little kid me and my family got a picture with him. This was about 10 years ago I believe. I was just looking at the picture yesterday which motivated me to look up his page and comment. He was 110% taller than 6'6, he completely towered over my dad who is 5'7.5 by over a foot. I know pictures can be deceiving but he looked 6'8 minimum in the photo. I really feel he was 6'7 easily peak, he is a huge guy.
I met him at an autograph signing when i was a little kid me and my family got a picture with him. This was about 10 years ago I believe. I was just looking at the picture yesterday which motivated me to look up his page and comment. He was 110% taller than 6'6, he completely towered over my dad who is 5'7.5 by over a foot. I know pictures can be deceiving but he looked 6'8 minimum in the photo. I really feel he was 6'7 easily peak, he is a huge guy.
James B said on 9/Oct/16
I saw a much on YouTube between Scott hall/Sid and there wasn't that much between them.
I saw a much on YouTube between Scott hall/Sid and there wasn't that much between them.
joe### said on 8/Oct/16
it is in normal posture with hulk hogan
also seemed taller 2hinches that scott hall
it is in normal posture with hulk hogan
also seemed taller 2hinches that scott hall
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Oct/16
Looked a decent 6ft7 in the 90's. Had a fair bit of height over the 6ft5 guys
Looked a decent 6ft7 in the 90's. Had a fair bit of height over the 6ft5 guys
James B said on 8/Oct/16
Not to mention Sid didn't look like a 6'7 guy up against lex Luger but then you could say Luger was 6'3 1/2
Not to mention Sid didn't look like a 6'7 guy up against lex Luger but then you could say Luger was 6'3 1/2
James B said on 7/Oct/16
It does seem that the majority of votes so far do favour Sid being minimum 6'6.5 but keep in mind though that he probably did force posture next guys like the undertaker a lot of the time. He forced good posture in past staredowms with Kevin Nash too.
I think a lot of people on this page don't realise how tall a 6'6-6'7 man can look with military posture. Put it this way if a peak Kevin Nash had stood as well as Sid people would be saying he was 6'11.
It does seem that the majority of votes so far do favour Sid being minimum 6'6.5 but keep in mind though that he probably did force posture next guys like the undertaker a lot of the time. He forced good posture in past staredowms with Kevin Nash too.
I think a lot of people on this page don't realise how tall a 6'6-6'7 man can look with military posture. Put it this way if a peak Kevin Nash had stood as well as Sid people would be saying he was 6'11.
kingkong56 said on 5/Oct/16
Also, comparison with Hogan puts Sid at a 6'7 peak, no doubt.
What do you guys think his peak weight was? 300-310 lbs?
Also, comparison with Hogan puts Sid at a 6'7 peak, no doubt.
What do you guys think his peak weight was? 300-310 lbs?
dewie said on 5/Oct/16
Taker 6ft8.25 sid 6ft7.5 peak
Taker 6ft8.25 sid 6ft7.5 peak
kingkong56 said on 3/Oct/16
Got to be at least 6'7 peak. Looked too close in height to the deadman to be anything less. Not too sure about current height though.
Got to be at least 6'7 peak. Looked too close in height to the deadman to be anything less. Not too sure about current height though.
The Ben said on 1/Oct/16
Just over 6'7 peak.
6'6 today.
Just over 6'7 peak.
6'6 today.
Michael said on 30/Sep/16
6-6,5 or below as Sid´s peak height? That is ruled out by tons of pics
with Barry Windham, The Undertaker or Hulk Hogan and comparisions
with others! Look at "JTJTphotos" or "Urgemonster", ...
Now: 6-6 (standing fully streched out), peak: 6-7,5.
6-6,5 or below as Sid´s peak height? That is ruled out by tons of pics
with Barry Windham, The Undertaker or Hulk Hogan and comparisions
with others! Look at "JTJTphotos" or "Urgemonster", ...
Now: 6-6 (standing fully streched out), peak: 6-7,5.
Rucuja said on 21/Sep/16
in the 80's nearly the same height these two. (+ - 1cm difference)
in the 80's nearly the same height these two. (+ - 1cm difference)
joe### said on 1/Sep/16
peak 6´6.75
peak 6´6.75
dewie said on 30/Aug/16
Taker solid 6ft8.75 205cm sid 6ft7.5 202cm peak
Taker solid 6ft8.75 205cm sid 6ft7.5 202cm peak
Aza said on 11/Aug/16
Believe his peak was higher...6"7..barely any difference in stare downs in Taker whose peak was 6'7.5
Believe his peak was higher...6"7..barely any difference in stare downs in Taker whose peak was 6'7.5
dewie said on 10/Aug/16
Rob now sid 6ft5.5 197cm taker 6ft6.5 199cm
Rob now sid 6ft5.5 197cm taker 6ft6.5 199cm
@HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 8/Aug/16
Yeah I was looking some wcw vids of Sid and can understand Robs 6´6.5" listing. I have him at 6´6.75" because I don´t see Taker under 6´7" and Sid was pretty close in 1989, 1991, 1997.
Sid looked shorter next to Hogan at Summerslam 1991 than he did at Wrestlemania 8, 8 month later.
Either Hogan lost a bit during that time or they worked on Sids boots.
To me Hogan looked 6´5" flat at WM8 and Sid 6´6.75". The supposed 2" gap I could never measure, always between 4cm and 4.5cm.
I agree Hogan at 6´5.5 would fit much better, but there are others Rob is also much more generous to compared to Sid.
Hill Billy Jim from 6´5.5" to 6´4.5", he was clearly an inch shorter than Hogan, shorter than Fralic and Spivey
Barry Windham from 6´5" to 6´4", he was easy an inch shorter than his 6´5" dad in equal footwear and around 2.5" shorter than Sid
Big Show from 7´0" to 6´11", much evidence posted this week
Andre from 7´0" to 6´11"
Nathan Jones from 6´10" to 6´9", was listed 6´9" as barefoot fighter
....
But their listings are all in a range they would measure sometimes during the day...
I agree the listings doesn´t fit wich eachother if we use an equalizer like eveningheight.
Yeah I was looking some wcw vids of Sid and can understand Robs 6´6.5" listing. I have him at 6´6.75" because I don´t see Taker under 6´7" and Sid was pretty close in 1989, 1991, 1997.
Sid looked shorter next to Hogan at Summerslam 1991 than he did at Wrestlemania 8, 8 month later.
Either Hogan lost a bit during that time or they worked on Sids boots.
To me Hogan looked 6´5" flat at WM8 and Sid 6´6.75". The supposed 2" gap I could never measure, always between 4cm and 4.5cm.
I agree Hogan at 6´5.5 would fit much better, but there are others Rob is also much more generous to compared to Sid.
Hill Billy Jim from 6´5.5" to 6´4.5", he was clearly an inch shorter than Hogan, shorter than Fralic and Spivey
Barry Windham from 6´5" to 6´4", he was easy an inch shorter than his 6´5" dad in equal footwear and around 2.5" shorter than Sid
Big Show from 7´0" to 6´11", much evidence posted this week
Andre from 7´0" to 6´11"
Nathan Jones from 6´10" to 6´9", was listed 6´9" as barefoot fighter
....
But their listings are all in a range they would measure sometimes during the day...
I agree the listings doesn´t fit wich eachother if we use an equalizer like eveningheight.
dicksock said on 6/Aug/16
This site should change Hogan and Sid's peak heights to 6'5.5" and 6'7" respectively. To have their peak heights only .5" apart is a joke. It's so absurd, it's not even debatable. I dare anyone to argue that point.
This site should change Hogan and Sid's peak heights to 6'5.5" and 6'7" respectively. To have their peak heights only .5" apart is a joke. It's so absurd, it's not even debatable. I dare anyone to argue that point.
dewie said on 4/Aug/16
Taker 205cm sid 201cm hogan 196cm
Taker 205cm sid 201cm hogan 196cm
Canson said on 3/Aug/16
He would edge hogan in his prime. And I'd say by an inch or inch and a half easy. He was probably a full 200-201 for his prime. I can see him above the listing Rob has possibly by comparison. 6'6 today fits well. Hulk was 196-197 in tip top prime never a full 198cm tho
He would edge hogan in his prime. And I'd say by an inch or inch and a half easy. He was probably a full 200-201 for his prime. I can see him above the listing Rob has possibly by comparison. 6'6 today fits well. Hulk was 196-197 in tip top prime never a full 198cm tho
dewie said on 12/Jul/16
Taker 6ft8 sid 6ft7.75 barefoot
Taker 6ft8 sid 6ft7.75 barefoot
aaronious said on 6/Jul/16
are you all blind? in every taker/sid staredown, they are the same exact height! 6'7" peak Sid, minimum!
are you all blind? in every taker/sid staredown, they are the same exact height! 6'7" peak Sid, minimum!
James B said on 2/Jul/16
Hogan might have not been over a strong 6'5 peak.
6'5.5 for Sid today I think is likely
Hogan might have not been over a strong 6'5 peak.
6'5.5 for Sid today I think is likely
The Ben said on 1/Jul/16
6'6 today sounds good.
It's crazy how different heights can look. I have a friend who's 6'6 and you'd swear he was 6'4 tops and another who's 6'7.5 and you'd swear he was 6'9. When they're together you can see there's only 1.5 in it.
It really can be incredibly hard to judge height.
6'6 today sounds good.
It's crazy how different heights can look. I have a friend who's 6'6 and you'd swear he was 6'4 tops and another who's 6'7.5 and you'd swear he was 6'9. When they're together you can see there's only 1.5 in it.
It really can be incredibly hard to judge height.
Max said on 1/Jul/16
6'6" sounds bang on for his current height. Met him a while back and we stood the same height, same shoes. Really nice guy.
6'6" sounds bang on for his current height. Met him a while back and we stood the same height, same shoes. Really nice guy.
MikeV10 said on 30/Jun/16
I think a 6'7 Peak height for Sid would fit better
I think a 6'7 Peak height for Sid would fit better
6'2 said on 24/Jun/16
if hogans 6'6 peak theres no way sid was 6'6.5. wm 8 1992 hulk hogan 6'5.5 280lbs sid justice 6'7.5 301lbs
if hogans 6'6 peak theres no way sid was 6'6.5. wm 8 1992 hulk hogan 6'5.5 280lbs sid justice 6'7.5 301lbs
dewie said on 30/Apr/16
Sid 6ft7.5 2.02m taker 6ft8 2.03m peak height barefoot in the morning undertaker 1cm taller
Sid 6ft7.5 2.02m taker 6ft8 2.03m peak height barefoot in the morning undertaker 1cm taller
dewie said on 28/Apr/16
Sid in the morning is 6ft7 201cm taker is 3cm taller 6ft8 6ft9 in the morning
Sid in the morning is 6ft7 201cm taker is 3cm taller 6ft8 6ft9 in the morning
James B said on 26/Apr/16
When Sid squared up to undertaker with his hockey mask on he really did look taller than 6'6.5 like over 6'7.
When Sid squared up to undertaker with his hockey mask on he really did look taller than 6'6.5 like over 6'7.
dewie said on 22/Apr/16
Sid 200cm taker 201.5cm
Sid 200cm taker 201.5cm
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 21/Apr/16
Sid 6´6.75"-6´7" peak, 6´5.75"-6´6" today
Taker 6´7"-6´7.5"peak, 6´6"-6´6.5" today
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Sid 6´6.75"-6´7" peak, 6´5.75"-6´6" today
Taker 6´7"-6´7.5"peak, 6´6"-6´6.5" today
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
dewie said on 20/Apr/16
Sid 6ft7 taker 6ft8.5 tall
Sid 6ft7 taker 6ft8.5 tall
dewie said on 20/Apr/16
Sid 201cm taker 203cm
Sid 201cm taker 203cm
LoganNoll1996 said on 16/Apr/16
When were they eye-to-eye, Johan? Not trying to come off rude but Sid's eye level always appeared higher than Taker's. Is there an image where they are eye-to-eye in similar footwear. It always intrigues me because Sid is always tilting his head up(raising his eye level) and standing with perfect posture whenever staring down Taker whereas it's hard to tell if Taker is standing as straight given his tendency to adopt a looser posture(makes sense given his deadman gimmick).
When were they eye-to-eye, Johan? Not trying to come off rude but Sid's eye level always appeared higher than Taker's. Is there an image where they are eye-to-eye in similar footwear. It always intrigues me because Sid is always tilting his head up(raising his eye level) and standing with perfect posture whenever staring down Taker whereas it's hard to tell if Taker is standing as straight given his tendency to adopt a looser posture(makes sense given his deadman gimmick).
Johan said on 16/Apr/16
It doesn't add up Logan. There is video proof of them being eye to eye when both were young. Sometimes taker was slightly taller once he became the deadman. Not an inch in it thats for sure.
A 6'6.5" peak Sid makes Hogan no more than 6'4.75" peak.
It doesn't add up Logan. There is video proof of them being eye to eye when both were young. Sometimes taker was slightly taller once he became the deadman. Not an inch in it thats for sure.
A 6'6.5" peak Sid makes Hogan no more than 6'4.75" peak.
LoganNoll1996 said on 15/Apr/16
What leads you to believe a peak Taker is an inch taller than a peak Sid, Rob? Almost everyone on this site agrees Taker was only a fraction taller.
What leads you to believe a peak Taker is an inch taller than a peak Sid, Rob? Almost everyone on this site agrees Taker was only a fraction taller.
James B said on 15/Apr/16
Sean said on 14/Apr/16
Sid 6'7" peak barefoot. No more, no less. I thought he had 1.5" on a peak 6'5.5" peak hogan. And 2 inches less than peak 6'9" Nash
He had 1.5 on a 6'5.5 hogan because of thicker wrestling boots and posture.
Sean said on 14/Apr/16
Sid 6'7" peak barefoot. No more, no less. I thought he had 1.5" on a peak 6'5.5" peak hogan. And 2 inches less than peak 6'9" Nash
He had 1.5 on a 6'5.5 hogan because of thicker wrestling boots and posture.
Sean said on 14/Apr/16
Sid 6'7" peak barefoot. No more, no less. I thought he had 1.5" on a peak 6'5.5" peak hogan. And 2 inches less than peak 6'9" Nash
Sid 6'7" peak barefoot. No more, no less. I thought he had 1.5" on a peak 6'5.5" peak hogan. And 2 inches less than peak 6'9" Nash
James B said on 1/Apr/16
Watched Sid vs diesel on the Internet last night and they both looked similar height range. Hard to believe there was 3 inches between but then maybe 3 is not all that much?
Watched Sid vs diesel on the Internet last night and they both looked similar height range. Hard to believe there was 3 inches between but then maybe 3 is not all that much?
6'2 said on 24/Mar/16
cant belive sid isnt close to 68 peak had hogan in 91 by at least 2"' pob ust uner 6'7 today peak has to be taller
cant belive sid isnt close to 68 peak had hogan in 91 by at least 2"' pob ust uner 6'7 today peak has to be taller
James B said on 23/Mar/16
Yeah today might be heading towards 6'5
Yeah today might be heading towards 6'5
joe### said on 21/Mar/16
humm,not look 6´7 with nash
i believe 6´6.75
humm,not look 6´7 with nash
i believe 6´6.75
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 16/Mar/16
Heyman is 5´9.25"-5´9.5", Sid looks 6´6.5"-6´7" next to him, Barry 6´4"-6´4.5".
Heyman is 5´9.25"-5´9.5", Sid looks 6´6.5"-6´7" next to him, Barry 6´4"-6´4.5".
The Ben said on 15/Mar/16
Saw a recent video and Sid really looked a lot shorter, 6'5 maybe 6'6.
Such an impressive look back in the day.
Saw a recent video and Sid really looked a lot shorter, 6'5 maybe 6'6.
Such an impressive look back in the day.
Paul said on 12/Mar/16
Sid peak height was was originally about 201-203cm depending of time of day.
Deduct about 2.5cm for the present and indeed was photographed at just over 198cm at about 3am one morning several years back when arrested.
Sid peak height was was originally about 201-203cm depending of time of day.
Deduct about 2.5cm for the present and indeed was photographed at just over 198cm at about 3am one morning several years back when arrested.
James B said on 13/Feb/16
I think in 91 Sid wore slightly larger than average wrestling boots at times which made him 6'7 legit which is why there looks a 2.5 inch difference between him and windham
Barry Windham I think was more 6'4.5 range than a full 6'5
I think in 91 Sid wore slightly larger than average wrestling boots at times which made him 6'7 legit which is why there looks a 2.5 inch difference between him and windham
Barry Windham I think was more 6'4.5 range than a full 6'5
Frank said on 6/Feb/16
Sid´s peak height is underrated here.
Click Here Rob has Windham at 6-5. The pic is from the mid 90ies.
Windham is even slightly behind Mamun and is already much taller than 5-8,25 Mamun.
And Sid is 2,5" taller than Barry here, 91: Click Here
Sid´s peak height must be 6-7,5+ In the pictures with Luger, Sid's head is leaning
slightly forward while Luger is fully stretched and Sid not.
Sid´s peak height is underrated here.
Click Here Rob has Windham at 6-5. The pic is from the mid 90ies.
Windham is even slightly behind Mamun and is already much taller than 5-8,25 Mamun.
And Sid is 2,5" taller than Barry here, 91: Click Here
Sid´s peak height must be 6-7,5+ In the pictures with Luger, Sid's head is leaning
slightly forward while Luger is fully stretched and Sid not.
Kenny said on 4/Feb/16
Hi rob how tall would you say the other sid vicious is? from the s*x pistols
hes listed 6'2 on google
Editor Rob
Hi rob how tall would you say the other sid vicious is? from the s*x pistols
hes listed 6'2 on google
Editor Rob I think maybe it is worth adding and putting the height he claimed out there...
dg said on 29/Jan/16
Half an inch between peak Sid and Hogan is impossible. There's just no way.
Half an inch between peak Sid and Hogan is impossible. There's just no way.
Tuga said on 26/Jan/16
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 25/Jan/16
My point was, in your pic/vids there is no fair cameraangle or position, you can´t draw a right line if the camera is to high or in most of your pics way to low (1991 staredown card and 1997 fullbodypic - way to low camera for drawing lines on the top of their heads).
That only proves you failed - no offense just fact
Sorry Red but the only fact is that your post is full of excuses, all those camera angles always favouring taker! All those lifts inside outside everywhere in taker boots!!
But again lets give you half cm or even close 1 cm or even really 1 cm, there you go, 2 cms still possible there in the best comparison we have :D you fail LOL
Sorry no offense (really!) ;)
Just having fun, lets waste no more time on what me and you have posted and not agree, I´ll focus on the wm13 staredown where we both agree its the best comparison ;)
As for the taker chunky boots and sid inside lifts, that´s all on you, just YOUR assumptions, never claimed sid had lifts so don´t even try it :P
I´ll try to get some captures of footware for BOTH since I think I have that match in good quality.
"you´know Tuga ;) I give just my honest opinion on (Robs system)evening height, rest is fun and bring up evidence."
Yeah, its cool, Rob has sid 3 cms lower than taker :P :P :P
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 25/Jan/16
My point was, in your pic/vids there is no fair cameraangle or position, you can´t draw a right line if the camera is to high or in most of your pics way to low (1991 staredown card and 1997 fullbodypic - way to low camera for drawing lines on the top of their heads).
That only proves you failed - no offense just fact
Sorry Red but the only fact is that your post is full of excuses, all those camera angles always favouring taker! All those lifts inside outside everywhere in taker boots!!
But again lets give you half cm or even close 1 cm or even really 1 cm, there you go, 2 cms still possible there in the best comparison we have :D you fail LOL
Sorry no offense (really!) ;)
Just having fun, lets waste no more time on what me and you have posted and not agree, I´ll focus on the wm13 staredown where we both agree its the best comparison ;)
As for the taker chunky boots and sid inside lifts, that´s all on you, just YOUR assumptions, never claimed sid had lifts so don´t even try it :P
I´ll try to get some captures of footware for BOTH since I think I have that match in good quality.
"you´know Tuga ;) I give just my honest opinion on (Robs system)evening height, rest is fun and bring up evidence."
Yeah, its cool, Rob has sid 3 cms lower than taker :P :P :P
184.3cm (Night) said on 26/Jan/16
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 23/Jan/16
Clear to see that Taker is only a fraction taller, so Sid 6´6.75-6´7" and Taker 6´7"-6´7.25" peak
Today Sid looks 6´6"flat and Taker 6´6.5"
Seems good to me.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 23/Jan/16
Clear to see that Taker is only a fraction taller, so Sid 6´6.75-6´7" and Taker 6´7"-6´7.25" peak
Today Sid looks 6´6"flat and Taker 6´6.5"
Seems good to me.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 25/Jan/16
you´know Tuga ;) I give just my honest opinion on (Robs system)evening height, rest is fun and bring up evidence.
Again
My point was, in your pic/vids there is no fair cameraangle or position, you can´t draw a right line if the camera is to high or in most of your pics way to low (1991 staredown card and 1997 fullbodypic - way to low camera for drawing lines on the top of their heads).
That only proves you failed - no offense just fact
the times i posted aren´t exactly, just the start of the sequences, the camera is perfect in the sid/taker- Mankind/vader conflict.
Although in the 1991 ElDiablo staredown and the famous 1989 staredown.
Hogan tiptoeing at WM8 is clear to see on vid, your claimed Sid tiptoeing is as far just an excuse - no video evidence
Sid wasn´t in big footwear at WM13 clear to see his normal boots AND you proved with your vids that Sid couldn´t have inside lifts, because in cowboyboots he was maybe an inch under Nash and in Wrestlingboots always 2-2.5" shorter.
Taker never had 2cm advantage over sid during their battles between 1989 and 1997 not in cwa, not in uswa, not in all staredowns with a clear headlevel camera except WM13 where he clearly wore chunky boots.
As I always state my estimations in evening/low height, it´s sure Taker could hit 6´8" getting out of bed.
rest is just a bit friendly needle meant with humor and a reminder on past times ;)
you´know Tuga ;) I give just my honest opinion on (Robs system)evening height, rest is fun and bring up evidence.
Again
My point was, in your pic/vids there is no fair cameraangle or position, you can´t draw a right line if the camera is to high or in most of your pics way to low (1991 staredown card and 1997 fullbodypic - way to low camera for drawing lines on the top of their heads).
That only proves you failed - no offense just fact
the times i posted aren´t exactly, just the start of the sequences, the camera is perfect in the sid/taker- Mankind/vader conflict.
Although in the 1991 ElDiablo staredown and the famous 1989 staredown.
Hogan tiptoeing at WM8 is clear to see on vid, your claimed Sid tiptoeing is as far just an excuse - no video evidence
Sid wasn´t in big footwear at WM13 clear to see his normal boots AND you proved with your vids that Sid couldn´t have inside lifts, because in cowboyboots he was maybe an inch under Nash and in Wrestlingboots always 2-2.5" shorter.
Taker never had 2cm advantage over sid during their battles between 1989 and 1997 not in cwa, not in uswa, not in all staredowns with a clear headlevel camera except WM13 where he clearly wore chunky boots.
As I always state my estimations in evening/low height, it´s sure Taker could hit 6´8" getting out of bed.
rest is just a bit friendly needle meant with humor and a reminder on past times ;)
Tuga said on 25/Jan/16
James B said on 24/Jan/16
Do you guys realise how tall a 6'6 1/2 man with good posture and a build like sids can look?
It annoys me you wave around 6'7 and 6'7.5 for him but you underestimate how tall 6'6.5 is
It annoys me the "sole" argument you make for your estimate for sid is the lex luger staredown...
It annoys me that you ignore pics and videos posted where he looks taller than he did with luger...
Well actually...It doesn´t annoy me at all :D
James B said on 24/Jan/16
Do you guys realise how tall a 6'6 1/2 man with good posture and a build like sids can look?
Do you realise how tall a 6'7 man with good posture and a build like sids can look?
James B said on 24/Jan/16
Do you guys realise how tall a 6'6 1/2 man with good posture and a build like sids can look?
It annoys me you wave around 6'7 and 6'7.5 for him but you underestimate how tall 6'6.5 is
It annoys me the "sole" argument you make for your estimate for sid is the lex luger staredown...
It annoys me that you ignore pics and videos posted where he looks taller than he did with luger...
Well actually...It doesn´t annoy me at all :D
James B said on 24/Jan/16
Do you guys realise how tall a 6'6 1/2 man with good posture and a build like sids can look?
Do you realise how tall a 6'7 man with good posture and a build like sids can look?
Tuga said on 25/Jan/16
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 23/Jan/16
You´re still fighting for your 6´8" Undertaker or why do you need to bring up other staredowns with bad cameraangles...
Don´t give me the "your 6´8" Undertaker" talk, he´s as much "my" 6'8 Undertaker as he is "your" 6'7 or 6'7 1/4 Undertaker.
For me, and I really mean IMO taker was solid 2 cms taller peak, not quite 1 inch but close/about, now if he looks it in the best comparison we have, and I mean same posture (no tip toes sid) full body shot even considering your supposed footware advantage (you compared to taker´s other boots not sid but whatever) I´ll take 0.54 cm from taker (I´m quite the nice guy ;)) 2 cms is more than fair.
Now "other staredowns with bad cameraangles", you can´t be serious, you post a video with references to times where 1st aren´t even staring each other, and 2nd start to stare but are immediately interrupted, I post a long staredown from the same era both standing straight and I "need to bring"..what? Really? Sorry but that alone tells me you saw the height diferencial...
Click Here
Just another staredown...
Tip toes sid can look nearly same height, I´ve said it before, seriously, didn´t you mention hogan do the same against sid...
But I´m ok with your estimates, we´ve been at it for some time, the thing I still tell you is that you´re going at the absolutely minimum heights they could have been ;P
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 23/Jan/16
You´re still fighting for your 6´8" Undertaker or why do you need to bring up other staredowns with bad cameraangles...
Don´t give me the "your 6´8" Undertaker" talk, he´s as much "my" 6'8 Undertaker as he is "your" 6'7 or 6'7 1/4 Undertaker.
For me, and I really mean IMO taker was solid 2 cms taller peak, not quite 1 inch but close/about, now if he looks it in the best comparison we have, and I mean same posture (no tip toes sid) full body shot even considering your supposed footware advantage (you compared to taker´s other boots not sid but whatever) I´ll take 0.54 cm from taker (I´m quite the nice guy ;)) 2 cms is more than fair.
Now "other staredowns with bad cameraangles", you can´t be serious, you post a video with references to times where 1st aren´t even staring each other, and 2nd start to stare but are immediately interrupted, I post a long staredown from the same era both standing straight and I "need to bring"..what? Really? Sorry but that alone tells me you saw the height diferencial...
Click Here
Just another staredown...
Tip toes sid can look nearly same height, I´ve said it before, seriously, didn´t you mention hogan do the same against sid...
But I´m ok with your estimates, we´ve been at it for some time, the thing I still tell you is that you´re going at the absolutely minimum heights they could have been ;P
184.3cm (Night) said on 25/Jan/16
If Sid was 6'6.5" peak James then Hogan was never 6'6. Barry Windham was never 6'5 etc.
Im starting to doubt taking pics from the ring as evidence after seeing a 6'4 Luke ( dressed as fake Kane) looking Glenn in the eye They obviously have huge boots for occasions.
Look up The Four Horsemen on youtube. Take a look at how huge Sid is nex to Ric flair, Barry Windham, Arn Anderson, they are all in suits/casual wear.
If Sid was 6'6.5" peak James then Hogan was never 6'6. Barry Windham was never 6'5 etc.
Im starting to doubt taking pics from the ring as evidence after seeing a 6'4 Luke ( dressed as fake Kane) looking Glenn in the eye They obviously have huge boots for occasions.
Look up The Four Horsemen on youtube. Take a look at how huge Sid is nex to Ric flair, Barry Windham, Arn Anderson, they are all in suits/casual wear.
James B said on 24/Jan/16
Do you guys realise how tall a 6'6 1/2 man with good posture and a build like sids can look?
It annoys me you wave around 6'7 and 6'7.5 for him but you underestimate how tall 6'6.5 is
Do you guys realise how tall a 6'6 1/2 man with good posture and a build like sids can look?
It annoys me you wave around 6'7 and 6'7.5 for him but you underestimate how tall 6'6.5 is
Tuga said on 23/Jan/16
Click Here
With vince shawn and diesel (cowboys boots yes still...)
Click Here
with jbl, easy 2 inch gap.
Click Here
with barry windham, listed 6'5 here.
Click Here
with vince (6´1 1/2 peak) and ted dibiase (6'3 peak) listed here.
Click Here
Click Here
Staredowns with kevin nash.
Speaking of nash, here with oliver miller measured 6'7 1/2 (nba listed at 6'9)
Click Here
So this guy is supposed to be taller than sid by 1 inch?? :p
Click Here
With vince shawn and diesel (cowboys boots yes still...)
Click Here
with jbl, easy 2 inch gap.
Click Here
with barry windham, listed 6'5 here.
Click Here
with vince (6´1 1/2 peak) and ted dibiase (6'3 peak) listed here.
Click Here
Click Here
Staredowns with kevin nash.
Speaking of nash, here with oliver miller measured 6'7 1/2 (nba listed at 6'9)
Click Here
So this guy is supposed to be taller than sid by 1 inch?? :p
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 23/Jan/16
Tuga said on 15/Jan/16
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 7/Jan/16
Click Here
Taker without his WM13 lifts has no inch on Sid 5:50 and 8:40
What lifts? Here you go again...:P
Did you miss my post from 19 December with a long staredown between the 2 BOTH standing straight?
_______________________________________________________________________________________
You´re still fighting for your 6´8" Undertaker or why do you need to bring up other staredowns with bad cameraangles...
Taker in equal footwear and camera at headlevel never had an inch on Sid, except WM13 - so looking at the footwear of Takers first Wrestlemania headline shows they are chunky and unusual thick compared to the normal he wore against Kane Click Here
No inch between Sid and Taker
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Clear to see that Taker is only a fraction taller, so Sid 6´6.75-6´7" and Taker 6´7"-6´7.25" peak
Today Sid looks 6´6"flat and Taker 6´6.5"
Tuga said on 15/Jan/16
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 7/Jan/16
Click Here
Taker without his WM13 lifts has no inch on Sid 5:50 and 8:40
What lifts? Here you go again...:P
Did you miss my post from 19 December with a long staredown between the 2 BOTH standing straight?
_______________________________________________________________________________________
You´re still fighting for your 6´8" Undertaker or why do you need to bring up other staredowns with bad cameraangles...
Taker in equal footwear and camera at headlevel never had an inch on Sid, except WM13 - so looking at the footwear of Takers first Wrestlemania headline shows they are chunky and unusual thick compared to the normal he wore against Kane Click Here
No inch between Sid and Taker
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Clear to see that Taker is only a fraction taller, so Sid 6´6.75-6´7" and Taker 6´7"-6´7.25" peak
Today Sid looks 6´6"flat and Taker 6´6.5"
James B said on 18/Jan/16
Sid was 6'6.5 not 6'7
Taker who was 6'7.25 in 1997 looks a bit taller in the video posted so no way is Sid a full 6'7
Sid was 6'6.5 not 6'7
Taker who was 6'7.25 in 1997 looks a bit taller in the video posted so no way is Sid a full 6'7
Tuga said on 15/Jan/16
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 7/Jan/16
Click Here
Taker without his WM13 lifts has no inch on Sid 5:50 and 8:40
What lifts? Here you go again...:P
Did you miss my post from 19 December with a long staredown between the 2 BOTH standing straight?
Click Here
Click Here
Where are the lifts? Same footware as in your video.
---
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 7/Jan/16
1992 WM8 Hogan was slightly tiptoeing and Sid still easy 1.5" taller
I agree! ;)
Sid could even look about 2 inches taller, but its safe to put hogan at 6'5 1/2 and Sid at a solid 6'7.
Nowaydays sid is problaby max 6'6 and hogan 6'3 1/2 max with his best posture IMO.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 7/Jan/16
Click Here
Taker without his WM13 lifts has no inch on Sid 5:50 and 8:40
What lifts? Here you go again...:P
Did you miss my post from 19 December with a long staredown between the 2 BOTH standing straight?
Click Here
Click Here
Where are the lifts? Same footware as in your video.
---
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 7/Jan/16
1992 WM8 Hogan was slightly tiptoeing and Sid still easy 1.5" taller
I agree! ;)
Sid could even look about 2 inches taller, but its safe to put hogan at 6'5 1/2 and Sid at a solid 6'7.
Nowaydays sid is problaby max 6'6 and hogan 6'3 1/2 max with his best posture IMO.
Frank said on 11/Jan/16
...and has nothing to do with the reality.
James B said on 9/Jan/16
6'6.5 peak for Sid and solid 6'7 peak for undertaker I think is fine.
...and has nothing to do with the reality.
James B said on 9/Jan/16
6'6.5 peak for Sid and solid 6'7 peak for undertaker I think is fine.
James B said on 9/Jan/16
6'6.5 peak for Sid and solid 6'7 peak for undertaker I think is fine.
6'6.5 peak for Sid and solid 6'7 peak for undertaker I think is fine.
James B said on 7/Jan/16
Held his own against Kevin Nash in terms of size.
Held his own against Kevin Nash in terms of size.
Triks said on 7/Jan/16
6 ft 7 peak for sure.
6 ft 7 peak for sure.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 7/Jan/16
Click Here
Taker without his WM13 lifts has no inch on Sid 5:50 and 8:40
If Sid was 6´6", Taker was max 6´6.5" there
1992 WM8 Hogan was slightly tiptoeing and Sid still easy 1.5" taller making Hogan under 6´4.5".
Not impossible at all.
I got them slightly taller
Taker 6´7.25"
Sid 6´6.75
Hogan 6´5.25
peak
Click Here
Taker without his WM13 lifts has no inch on Sid 5:50 and 8:40
If Sid was 6´6", Taker was max 6´6.5" there
1992 WM8 Hogan was slightly tiptoeing and Sid still easy 1.5" taller making Hogan under 6´4.5".
Not impossible at all.
I got them slightly taller
Taker 6´7.25"
Sid 6´6.75
Hogan 6´5.25
peak
FN said on 1/Jan/16
Undertaker is 6'9''. And Sid Vicious almost like Undertaker
Undertaker is 6'9''. And Sid Vicious almost like Undertaker
James B said on 27/Dec/15
CLEMENT said on 26/Dec/15
BIG SID JUSTICE IS 6'51/2"
6'5 1/2 today maybe but he was no less than 6'6 prime for sure
CLEMENT said on 26/Dec/15
BIG SID JUSTICE IS 6'51/2"
6'5 1/2 today maybe but he was no less than 6'6 prime for sure
CLEMENT said on 26/Dec/15
BIG SID JUSTICE IS 6'51/2"
BIG SID JUSTICE IS 6'51/2"
James B said on 20/Dec/15
sorry rob but I am just curious to ask this......
Since you think there is a chance undertaker was just 6ft7 peak and there was 1 inch between him and Sid at mania 97 that could incidcate just 6'6 for Sid?
Editor Rob
sorry rob but I am just curious to ask this......
Since you think there is a chance undertaker was just 6ft7 peak and there was 1 inch between him and Sid at mania 97 that could incidcate just 6'6 for Sid?
Editor Rob for both of them, that is the argument, they could be 6ft 7/6 or both a bit over that peak. For the moment I've been leaving them at their current marks.
Tuga said on 19/Dec/15
Frank said on 16/Dec/15
Hogan and Sid with a peak height of 6-6? No way!
Totally agree.
I would put hogan at 6'5 1/2, but could have been 6'6, but eitherway hogan still looked 6'5 1/2 (just look at him with piper and tenta for ex)at the time he faced sid in wwf and no way they were equal in height, Now sid can make himself look taller than he is, but still he was minimum 6'7 and possible as tall as 6'7 1/2.
Some are using the luger staredown but do look at it closer, luger there has the posture advantage and looks to be "tiptoeing", there if luger isn´t more than 6'3 sid may look a bit under 6´7 but then we have also this staredown:
Click Here
There he looks easly over 6'7...
Also look up his staredowns with nash, who peak height IMO was no less than 6'9 1/2, no way nash is over 3 inches taller.
Frank, now about sid being max 1/2 inch shorter than taker now I have my doubts, in dubious staredowns with tiptoeing and bad angles maybe, but good old near perfect staredowns I do believe it was about 1 inch:
Click Here
Click Here
The video:
Click Here
Look at the end 13:40 min more or less.
You can see that in a long staredown sid has trouble in keeping his posture and even matching taker´s eye level and we know well taker has a longer forehead...
Well just to say he may have been "just" 6´7, but no way shorter than that, so hogan between 6'5 1/2 and 6'6, sid 6'7 to 6'7 1/2, nash 6'9 1/2, taker 6'8 are the estimates I have for these men.
Frank said on 16/Dec/15
Hogan and Sid with a peak height of 6-6? No way!
Totally agree.
I would put hogan at 6'5 1/2, but could have been 6'6, but eitherway hogan still looked 6'5 1/2 (just look at him with piper and tenta for ex)at the time he faced sid in wwf and no way they were equal in height, Now sid can make himself look taller than he is, but still he was minimum 6'7 and possible as tall as 6'7 1/2.
Some are using the luger staredown but do look at it closer, luger there has the posture advantage and looks to be "tiptoeing", there if luger isn´t more than 6'3 sid may look a bit under 6´7 but then we have also this staredown:
Click Here
There he looks easly over 6'7...
Also look up his staredowns with nash, who peak height IMO was no less than 6'9 1/2, no way nash is over 3 inches taller.
Frank, now about sid being max 1/2 inch shorter than taker now I have my doubts, in dubious staredowns with tiptoeing and bad angles maybe, but good old near perfect staredowns I do believe it was about 1 inch:
Click Here
Click Here
The video:
Click Here
Look at the end 13:40 min more or less.
You can see that in a long staredown sid has trouble in keeping his posture and even matching taker´s eye level and we know well taker has a longer forehead...
Well just to say he may have been "just" 6´7, but no way shorter than that, so hogan between 6'5 1/2 and 6'6, sid 6'7 to 6'7 1/2, nash 6'9 1/2, taker 6'8 are the estimates I have for these men.
Paul said on 17/Dec/15
Peak height was 6'7.75 or so.
Peak height was 6'7.75 or so.
James B said on 16/Dec/15
Rob just one more question.........could 6'5.5 be possible for sids current height or do you think he is still a full 6'6?
Editor Rob
Rob just one more question.........could 6'5.5 be possible for sids current height or do you think he is still a full 6'6?
Editor Rob not looked as much at how he looks in last couple of years to really tell
184.3cm (Night) said on 16/Dec/15
Has more than a full head on Mamun who has excellent posture in that pic. I still think 6'7 is a better shout, he has edged Taker out before and viceversa.
I read his 6'8 claim years ago and just assumed he meant with shoes. Just seems a bit weird they would bill him at 6'10 if he was only in the 6'6 range. He held his own next to Nash in WcW.
Has more than a full head on Mamun who has excellent posture in that pic. I still think 6'7 is a better shout, he has edged Taker out before and viceversa.
I read his 6'8 claim years ago and just assumed he meant with shoes. Just seems a bit weird they would bill him at 6'10 if he was only in the 6'6 range. He held his own next to Nash in WcW.
Frank said on 16/Dec/15
Hogan and Sid with a peak height of 6-6? No way!
6-6 as peak height for Sid, means that Hogan was under 6-3,5/6-4 in ´92:
Click Here 6-6 peak Sid means Taker was 6-6,5 max in the 90ies.
Absolutly nothing fits. Look at this: Click Here Sid is about 2,5" taller than
Windham. Rob has Windham at 6-5! Sid and DiBiase: Click Here Ted DiBiase
at 6/6-1 in ´95? Everthing under 6-7 peak height for Sid is ruled out. His peak peak height was
more likely about 6-7,5.
Hogan and Sid with a peak height of 6-6? No way!
6-6 as peak height for Sid, means that Hogan was under 6-3,5/6-4 in ´92:
Click Here 6-6 peak Sid means Taker was 6-6,5 max in the 90ies.
Absolutly nothing fits. Look at this: Click Here Sid is about 2,5" taller than
Windham. Rob has Windham at 6-5! Sid and DiBiase: Click Here Ted DiBiase
at 6/6-1 in ´95? Everthing under 6-7 peak height for Sid is ruled out. His peak peak height was
more likely about 6-7,5.
James B said on 14/Dec/15
Rob could you answer this
Might just 6ft6 have been his peak height?
Editor Rob
Rob could you answer this
Might just 6ft6 have been his peak height?
Editor Rob 6ft 6 is arguable...remember he did look no less than that when mamun's photo was here, I thought 6ft 6.5 fitted
James B said on 11/Dec/15
Rob could 6'6.5 be too low for sids peak if Luger had thicker footware?
Then again Sid was shorter than 6'7 undertaker at mania 97
Editor Rob
Rob could 6'6.5 be too low for sids peak if Luger had thicker footware?
Then again Sid was shorter than 6'7 undertaker at mania 97
Editor Rob I think 6.5 is ok for him, from all I've seen...but like anything, sometimes a guy looks taller/shorter than a listing.
184.3cm (Night) said on 6/Dec/15
Easily 3.5 inches on Luger who had more footwear. Wasn't Luger billed 6'4 im sure he was. Is there some kind of evidence he was 6'3 flat?
Easily 3.5 inches on Luger who had more footwear. Wasn't Luger billed 6'4 im sure he was. Is there some kind of evidence he was 6'3 flat?
6'2 said on 4/Dec/15
As a rookie he was given 6'7 it wouldn't have been a billed height because it was just written by press. So he wasn't less than 6'7
As a rookie he was given 6'7 it wouldn't have been a billed height because it was just written by press. So he wasn't less than 6'7
James B said on 26/Oct/15
More like 6'6 with lex luger
Click Here
You guys don't realise just how big a true 6'6 is in reality.
More like 6'6 with lex luger
Click Here
You guys don't realise just how big a true 6'6 is in reality.
184.3cm (Night) said on 25/Oct/15
I would have given Sid 6'7 peak he was always slightly shorter than Nash. For sure more than an inch on a peak Hogan. I have him at 6'5.5".
I would have given Sid 6'7 peak he was always slightly shorter than Nash. For sure more than an inch on a peak Hogan. I have him at 6'5.5".
ddk said on 24/Oct/15
6'7" peak barefoot 6'9" in boots
6'6" today barefoot 6'8" in boots
6'7" peak barefoot 6'9" in boots
6'6" today barefoot 6'8" in boots
6'2 said on 23/Oct/15
I've always said taker 6'8 at most 6'8.5 peak sid was maybe half an inch shorter sid could be 6'8 peak but not shorter than 6'7 hogan in 92 I'd say was 6'5.5" maybe 6'5 he seemed slightly shorter than 6'6 earthquake
I've always said taker 6'8 at most 6'8.5 peak sid was maybe half an inch shorter sid could be 6'8 peak but not shorter than 6'7 hogan in 92 I'd say was 6'5.5" maybe 6'5 he seemed slightly shorter than 6'6 earthquake
James B said on 16/Oct/15
6'2 said on 15/Oct/15
So James B how much of a difference do you reckon sid was taller than hogan? do you think kevin Nash Had 3.5" on sid more like 2 you still come out with a 6'8 Sid and no body will change my mind on 6'10 peak Nash cause that's exactly what he was
Sid stood 1.5 inches taller than hogan in the early 90s because he wore slightly thicker wrestling boots. Around that time I think hogan was no more than 6'5-6'6 range anyway. I'd say without his wrestling boots he'd be 1 inch taller than hogan.
I don't see a 6'8 sid next to lex Luger at road wild 1991 or at mania 97 when he squared up to undertaker. Honestly I'd go as far saying he looks 6'6.25 compared to them.
Of course you will try to validate that taker was a strong 6'9 and Luger was 6'5. Watch taker face nash at mania 95 and now way does he look 6'9.
6'2 said on 15/Oct/15
So James B how much of a difference do you reckon sid was taller than hogan? do you think kevin Nash Had 3.5" on sid more like 2 you still come out with a 6'8 Sid and no body will change my mind on 6'10 peak Nash cause that's exactly what he was
Sid stood 1.5 inches taller than hogan in the early 90s because he wore slightly thicker wrestling boots. Around that time I think hogan was no more than 6'5-6'6 range anyway. I'd say without his wrestling boots he'd be 1 inch taller than hogan.
I don't see a 6'8 sid next to lex Luger at road wild 1991 or at mania 97 when he squared up to undertaker. Honestly I'd go as far saying he looks 6'6.25 compared to them.
Of course you will try to validate that taker was a strong 6'9 and Luger was 6'5. Watch taker face nash at mania 95 and now way does he look 6'9.
6'2 said on 15/Oct/15
So James B how much of a difference do you reckon sid was taller than hogan? do you think kevin Nash Had 3.5" on sid more like 2 you still come out with a 6'8 Sid and no body will change my mind on 6'10 peak Nash cause that's exactly what he was
So James B how much of a difference do you reckon sid was taller than hogan? do you think kevin Nash Had 3.5" on sid more like 2 you still come out with a 6'8 Sid and no body will change my mind on 6'10 peak Nash cause that's exactly what he was
James B said on 13/Oct/15
6'2 said on 8/Oct/15
Sid was a monster look at him to gene and wimpleman and the likes, he really towers over them he had hogan by nearly 3" in 1992 6'6.5 peak no way closer to 6'8 taker was 6'8.5 at his tallest there's no way hogan can be 6'6 if Sid is 6'6.5
Or maybe you are forgetting just how massive a 6'6.5 guy can look with his kind of physique in ring gear.
Also with hogan he wore thicker wrestling boots add to the fact as well hogan already started to lose height at that point.
6'2 said on 8/Oct/15
Sid was a monster look at him to gene and wimpleman and the likes, he really towers over them he had hogan by nearly 3" in 1992 6'6.5 peak no way closer to 6'8 taker was 6'8.5 at his tallest there's no way hogan can be 6'6 if Sid is 6'6.5
Or maybe you are forgetting just how massive a 6'6.5 guy can look with his kind of physique in ring gear.
Also with hogan he wore thicker wrestling boots add to the fact as well hogan already started to lose height at that point.
6'2 said on 8/Oct/15
Sid was a monster look at him to gene and wimpleman and the likes, he really towers over them he had hogan by nearly 3" in 1992 6'6.5 peak no way closer to 6'8 taker was 6'8.5 at his tallest there's no way hogan can be 6'6 if Sid is 6'6.5
Sid was a monster look at him to gene and wimpleman and the likes, he really towers over them he had hogan by nearly 3" in 1992 6'6.5 peak no way closer to 6'8 taker was 6'8.5 at his tallest there's no way hogan can be 6'6 if Sid is 6'6.5
Dmw said on 17/Sep/15
From all of the pictures I have seen with these guys standing next to each other and other tall people who have similar size it looks to me like Sid was a legit 6'7"-6'7.5", Taker was 6'8", Hogan was 6'5.75- 6'6" prime, Studd and Sid were about the same height, and Andre was 7'.05" peak and 6' 10.5- 6'11" at the end of his career.
From all of the pictures I have seen with these guys standing next to each other and other tall people who have similar size it looks to me like Sid was a legit 6'7"-6'7.5", Taker was 6'8", Hogan was 6'5.75- 6'6" prime, Studd and Sid were about the same height, and Andre was 7'.05" peak and 6' 10.5- 6'11" at the end of his career.
James B said on 9/Sep/15
Rob could just 6ft6 peak be possible if he only had 3 on lex Luger?
Rob could just 6ft6 peak be possible if he only had 3 on lex Luger?
six feet said on 30/Jul/15
undertaker was 6 feet 6.5 inches without his boots.
undertaker was 6 feet 6.5 inches without his boots.
6'2 said on 22/Jul/15
Not sure on today for Sid but peak height has to be lifted he was literally a hair shorter than prime taker who was around 6'8-9"
Not sure on today for Sid but peak height has to be lifted he was literally a hair shorter than prime taker who was around 6'8-9"
Mighty_- said on 19/Jul/15
There is just no way Sid was under 6'7 prime..
Imo he was 6'7.5" hence the 6'9.5" classical 2 inche exaggeration for the bigger guys..
A 6'6.5" just doesn't compute with Hogan's prime, even if Hogan already had lost height when they faced..
Anyway there is just way too much evidence for Sid being 6'7+ in his prime
There is just no way Sid was under 6'7 prime..
Imo he was 6'7.5" hence the 6'9.5" classical 2 inche exaggeration for the bigger guys..
A 6'6.5" just doesn't compute with Hogan's prime, even if Hogan already had lost height when they faced..
Anyway there is just way too much evidence for Sid being 6'7+ in his prime
VC said on 13/Jul/15
@Clement, it's not surprising that taker & sid are shorter than nash an 1". That makes nash 6'6" & both taker and sid are 6'5".
@Clement, it's not surprising that taker & sid are shorter than nash an 1". That makes nash 6'6" & both taker and sid are 6'5".
James B said on 14/Jun/15
Rob Big show being ruler of the world would have madr more sense
Rob Big show being ruler of the world would have madr more sense
James B said on 7/Jun/15
Rob was his 'ruler of the world' gimmick something to do with his stature? In real life he would feel t
that way being over 6'5 where he would always be the tallest. In WWE he was amongst the tallest but there were taller guys such kevin Nash and undertaker.
Editor Rob
Rob was his 'ruler of the world' gimmick something to do with his stature? In real life he would feel t
that way being over 6'5 where he would always be the tallest. In WWE he was amongst the tallest but there were taller guys such kevin Nash and undertaker.
Editor Rob it was a kind of superiority gimmick, but yeah, when facing a bigger wrestler the idea isn't as impressive.
joe 193cm night said on 29/May/15
this listing to Sid does not fit mainly in hulk hogan listing at 6'6, Sid was always higher
this listing to Sid does not fit mainly in hulk hogan listing at 6'6, Sid was always higher
CLEMENT said on 25/May/15
really i dont have a clue...what you guys are trying...you guys mean to say taker is 6'7'' and sid is 6'6'' HOW????what do i see that big sid is atleast half inch taller than taker....and talking about kevin nash he is an strong 1 inch taller than taker....something really to think about taker 6'5''..sid 6'5and half ...and nash 6'6'',,,,,
really i dont have a clue...what you guys are trying...you guys mean to say taker is 6'7'' and sid is 6'6'' HOW????what do i see that big sid is atleast half inch taller than taker....and talking about kevin nash he is an strong 1 inch taller than taker....something really to think about taker 6'5''..sid 6'5and half ...and nash 6'6'',,,,,
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.