Camilla Luddington's Height
5ft 5 ⅛ (165.4 cm)
English actress, best known for playing Dr. Jo Wilson in Grey's Anatomy, Lizzie in Californication and Kate Middleton in TV film William & Kate. On Twitter she mentioned her height on a couple of occasions, saying "I'm only 5'5" and "I'm a teeny tiny bit over 5'5"". In this photo, I was wearing 0.75in Skechers, whilst Camilla's heels looked like they gave her a 2.3 inch footwear advantage over me.
5ft 8 Rob and Camilla (age 32) @ MCM Comic Con, 2016
You May Be Interested
Katherine Heigl
5ft 8 ½ (174 cm)
5ft 8 ½ (174 cm)
Eric Dane
6ft 1 (185 cm)
6ft 1 (185 cm)
Chyler Leigh
5ft 6 ½ (169 cm)
5ft 6 ½ (169 cm)
Kate Middleton
5ft 8 ¾ (175 cm)
5ft 8 ¾ (175 cm)
Add a Comment23 comments
Average Guess (17 Votes)
5ft 5.05in (165.2cm)
5ft 5.05in (165.2cm)
ChristianPerkins said on 16/Mar/22
165.5cm is ok. She could've been listed just 5'5" and it wouldn't have made much difference.
165.5cm is ok. She could've been listed just 5'5" and it wouldn't have made much difference.
khaled taban said on 17/Jul/19
This listing is very accurate.
This listing is very accurate.
Nik said on 17/Jun/19
It's interesting that 8 voters offer her the privilege of a 1/16th! Average vote = 5 foot 5 1/16 (5'5.06" after 8 votes!)!
It's interesting that 8 voters offer her the privilege of a 1/16th! Average vote = 5 foot 5 1/16 (5'5.06" after 8 votes!)!
Nik said on 3/May/19
She is actually a tad above average!
She is actually a tad above average!
Bobby said on 1/Nov/18
I swear 5'5 has to be the perfect height for a woman. I mean, I always thought so, but I also like women who can be as small as 5'2.
I swear 5'5 has to be the perfect height for a woman. I mean, I always thought so, but I also like women who can be as small as 5'2.
Nik said on 21/Jun/18
She's got the height she wanted!
She's got the height she wanted!
Nik said on 21/Jun/18
@ Rob - Absolutely! You have a lovely back to back picture with Camilla and she has the privilege of being listed in good old eighths, as she wanted!
@ Rob - Absolutely! You have a lovely back to back picture with Camilla and she has the privilege of being listed in good old eighths, as she wanted!
Nik said on 19/Jun/18
Nice pic!
Editor Rob
Nice pic!
Editor RobSo nice she even got the privilege of a 1/8th like she basically claimed.
Bobby said on 7/Oct/17
Alright so, Rob says that Camilla has a minimum of 2.3 inches of footwear advantage to his own that day. I'm gonna give Camilla the benefit of the doubt and assume it's that figure. Rob said he had on 0.7 inch footwear which was close to my estimate, and I'm gonna upgrade Camilla a full inch, because she looks only a tiny bit shorter than Rob. So, I'll assume a figure of 5'8 in heels, and if Rob is his typical 173cm self here, then he'd be 5'8.25 roughly in this photo. I'll also assume her heels give 3 inches like Rob said. So, Rob's footwear equals 0.7 inch, and hers equal 3 inches, this means that she indeed has 2.3 inches advantage. So, 2.3 minus 5'8 is 5'5.7, so she'd be 5'5.75 barefoot. Okay, let's assume that her heels give 3.2 inches now, because Rob said that was possible, which means she has 2.5 inches advantage. So, 2.5 inches minus 5'8 is 5'5.5, which still fits into my previous calculation. Give this girl an upgrade, Rob.
Alright so, Rob says that Camilla has a minimum of 2.3 inches of footwear advantage to his own that day. I'm gonna give Camilla the benefit of the doubt and assume it's that figure. Rob said he had on 0.7 inch footwear which was close to my estimate, and I'm gonna upgrade Camilla a full inch, because she looks only a tiny bit shorter than Rob. So, I'll assume a figure of 5'8 in heels, and if Rob is his typical 173cm self here, then he'd be 5'8.25 roughly in this photo. I'll also assume her heels give 3 inches like Rob said. So, Rob's footwear equals 0.7 inch, and hers equal 3 inches, this means that she indeed has 2.3 inches advantage. So, 2.3 minus 5'8 is 5'5.7, so she'd be 5'5.75 barefoot. Okay, let's assume that her heels give 3.2 inches now, because Rob said that was possible, which means she has 2.5 inches advantage. So, 2.5 inches minus 5'8 is 5'5.5, which still fits into my previous calculation. Give this girl an upgrade, Rob.
Bobby said on 5/Oct/17
Yeah, and you should mention she provides the voice of Lara Croft in the rebooted Tomb Raider games, and I think also her likeness as well.
Yeah, and you should mention she provides the voice of Lara Croft in the rebooted Tomb Raider games, and I think also her likeness as well.
Bobby said on 5/Oct/17
Looking 5'7 with the heels. You forgot to mention the heel advantage she had, Rob. I don't know what kind of shoes you were wearing, they don't look to add an inch though, they look to add half an inch in fact. So, your footwear equals 0.5 inches, and her footwear equals 2 inches. Which she has a 1.5 inch advantage over your own. Subtract 1.5 from 5'7 and she would be 5'5.5.
Editor Rob
I'm in 0.7 inch sneakers.
"her footwear equals 2 inches"...
Side on view.
Her heels give no less than the 3-3.2 inches range...👍
She has a minimum 2.3 inch advantage, but it's really near 2.5 as it's a very solid 3-inch range heel.
Looking 5'7 with the heels. You forgot to mention the heel advantage she had, Rob. I don't know what kind of shoes you were wearing, they don't look to add an inch though, they look to add half an inch in fact. So, your footwear equals 0.5 inches, and her footwear equals 2 inches. Which she has a 1.5 inch advantage over your own. Subtract 1.5 from 5'7 and she would be 5'5.5.
Editor RobI'm in 0.7 inch sneakers.
"her footwear equals 2 inches"...
Side on view.
Her heels give no less than the 3-3.2 inches range...👍
She has a minimum 2.3 inch advantage, but it's really near 2.5 as it's a very solid 3-inch range heel.
Ben said on 26/Sep/17
Mark said on 13/Jul/16
Rob is this a recent image?
Editor Rob: 2 months ago.
_______________________________________
Correction time Rob, it was 1 year and 4 months ago ;)
Editor Rob
Mark said on 13/Jul/16
Rob is this a recent image?
Editor Rob: 2 months ago.
_______________________________________
Correction time Rob, it was 1 year and 4 months ago ;)
Editor Rob in July 2016 when I replied, it was 2 months 👍
Blake said on 29/Jun/17
Sensational matching of posture Rob!
Sensational matching of posture Rob!
Mark said on 13/Jul/16
Rob is this a recent image?
Editor Rob
Rob is this a recent image?
Editor Rob 2 months ago.
Moke said on 13/Jun/16
Yes, beautiful girl.
Yes, beautiful girl.
Merky said on 2/Jun/16
Don't forget she also voiced Lara Croft in the Tomb Raider games, she is gorgeous!
Don't forget she also voiced Lara Croft in the Tomb Raider games, she is gorgeous!
Andrea said on 1/Jun/16
Nice "fresh" photo, Rob! It seems like you are still a good inch taller, despite the footwear advantage... How much her heels give? 3 inches?
Editor Rob
Nice "fresh" photo, Rob! It seems like you are still a good inch taller, despite the footwear advantage... How much her heels give? 3 inches?
Editor Rob I'd have guessed in 3-3.2 range (so between 2.3-2.5 more footwear), but I didn't think she was as much as an inch smaller...
without trying to do a pose this might have ended up unusable as she was leaning forward into the camera for the shots before me in the queue...
without trying to do a pose this might have ended up unusable as she was leaning forward into the camera for the shots before me in the queue...
grizz said on 23/Jun/15
Beautiful woman
Beautiful woman
Sam said on 15/Apr/15
Should probably add Grey's Anatomy to her know fors, not a show I enjoy unlike my wife but she's quite the hottie.
Should probably add Grey's Anatomy to her know fors, not a show I enjoy unlike my wife but she's quite the hottie.
Amaze said on 27/Oct/14
5'5 sure is right voiced tomb raiderrrr gorgeous woman fo sure :)
5'5 sure is right voiced tomb raiderrrr gorgeous woman fo sure :)
Ka said on 10/Mar/14
Judging from the length of her legs in lots of photos,I reckon she seems between 5'3-4(max) range and unlikely beyond that. Rob cares to comment?
Editor Rob
Judging from the length of her legs in lots of photos,I reckon she seems between 5'3-4(max) range and unlikely beyond that. Rob cares to comment?
Editor Rob not sure she'd be that short, could always be between 5ft 4 and 5 though
SolidSnake said on 3/May/13
Rob shes British or British American not just American
Editor Rob
Rob shes British or British American not just American
Editor Rob i changed that now.
LaraCroft2013 said on 25/Mar/13
165cm is accurate.
165cm is accurate.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.