Add a Comment9895 comments
Average Guess (944 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 7.69in (202.4cm)
Current: 6ft 6.4in (199.1cm)
Peak: 6ft 7.69in (202.4cm)
Current: 6ft 6.4in (199.1cm)
Canson said on 19/Feb/19
@Dan Trojan: agreed and today he also has worse posture to add to that
@Dan Trojan: agreed and today he also has worse posture to add to that
edwards said on 19/Feb/19
@ canson yes dude my estimate is same as yours, Hogan was likely not a full 6’6” but more a strong 6’5” maybe max 6’5.5 guy peak. I would say that Taker would have more difference on Hogan today than he did at their peaks as Hogan is likely around 6’3 maybe a hair over and Taker 6’6 maybe a hair under because hogan has shrink by almost 3 inch while taker has shrink by max 1.5 inch,the peak difference between peak hogan and peak taker was about 1.5 to 2 inch but currently hogan has shrink more inch when compared with taker hogan today seems about 3 inch shorter than taker compared to 1.5 to 2 inch peak.yes dudes i agree with you
@ canson yes dude my estimate is same as yours, Hogan was likely not a full 6’6” but more a strong 6’5” maybe max 6’5.5 guy peak. I would say that Taker would have more difference on Hogan today than he did at their peaks as Hogan is likely around 6’3 maybe a hair over and Taker 6’6 maybe a hair under because hogan has shrink by almost 3 inch while taker has shrink by max 1.5 inch,the peak difference between peak hogan and peak taker was about 1.5 to 2 inch but currently hogan has shrink more inch when compared with taker hogan today seems about 3 inch shorter than taker compared to 1.5 to 2 inch peak.yes dudes i agree with you
edwards said on 18/Feb/19
@ sotiris gravas dude in those photos sid has thicker hair and in the second one we cant see footwear.i aint trying for excuses just expressing my opinion as you are sticking to yours.in third picture sid is wearing marks and also remember taker has huge forehead low eye level,obviously sid has higher eye level than taker,maybe you are going by eye level but also remember taker has jiant head and lower eye level but personally i dont think sid is any taller than taker,there may be photos where sid is appearing taller than taker but there is enough photos flowing through internet where taker is looking taller or atleast have an edge,truth hurts ,sid was never taller than taker.
@ sotiris gravas dude in those photos sid has thicker hair and in the second one we cant see footwear.i aint trying for excuses just expressing my opinion as you are sticking to yours.in third picture sid is wearing marks and also remember taker has huge forehead low eye level,obviously sid has higher eye level than taker,maybe you are going by eye level but also remember taker has jiant head and lower eye level but personally i dont think sid is any taller than taker,there may be photos where sid is appearing taller than taker but there is enough photos flowing through internet where taker is looking taller or atleast have an edge,truth hurts ,sid was never taller than taker.
rawdshaq said on 18/Feb/19
I think Sid was 6'7" or 6'8" at peak. Also when I get time I'm going to completely redo Undertaker like I did Kane
I think Sid was 6'7" or 6'8" at peak. Also when I get time I'm going to completely redo Undertaker like I did Kane
James Brett 172cm said on 18/Feb/19
Canson said on 18/Feb/19
Sid May have just been a strong 6’6” at his peak in reality. Taker was in fact taller by around an inch
Some people don’t realise how large a strong 6’6 is
Canson said on 18/Feb/19
Sid May have just been a strong 6’6” at his peak in reality. Taker was in fact taller by around an inch
Some people don’t realise how large a strong 6’6 is
Dan Trojan said on 18/Feb/19
I can honestly understand why people may think sid is taller than then taker he seems to have a higher eye level than taker but taker's huge forehead makes him taller by maybe 0.5 to 1 inch
I can honestly understand why people may think sid is taller than then taker he seems to have a higher eye level than taker but taker's huge forehead makes him taller by maybe 0.5 to 1 inch
Canson said on 18/Feb/19
Sid May have just been a strong 6’6” at his peak in reality. Taker was in fact taller by around an inch
Sid May have just been a strong 6’6” at his peak in reality. Taker was in fact taller by around an inch
Canson said on 18/Feb/19
@Sotiris: Sid was not taller than Taker peak. It was the other way around. I could give Sid the weak 6’7” but Taker the strong 6’7”
@Sotiris: Sid was not taller than Taker peak. It was the other way around. I could give Sid the weak 6’7” but Taker the strong 6’7”
Canson said on 18/Feb/19
@Edwards: I agree with some of what you said. Taker was surely at least 6’7” at his peak. Personally 6’7.25 for his low looks good. And he was taller than Sid back then. However, Hogan was a good 1.5-2 if not a full 2” shorter than Taker. Hogan was likely not a full 6’6” but more a strong 6’5” maybe max 6’5.5 guy peak. I would say that Taker would have more difference on Hogan today than he did at their peaks as Hogan is likely around 6’3 maybe a hair over and Taker 6’6 maybe a hair under. I don’t agree with Sotiris here but he is entitled to his opinion. You are at least respectful with your responses toward him but I see others bashing him for low estimates yet don’t see that same stance being taken toward some of the height inflators here
@Edwards: I agree with some of what you said. Taker was surely at least 6’7” at his peak. Personally 6’7.25 for his low looks good. And he was taller than Sid back then. However, Hogan was a good 1.5-2 if not a full 2” shorter than Taker. Hogan was likely not a full 6’6” but more a strong 6’5” maybe max 6’5.5 guy peak. I would say that Taker would have more difference on Hogan today than he did at their peaks as Hogan is likely around 6’3 maybe a hair over and Taker 6’6 maybe a hair under. I don’t agree with Sotiris here but he is entitled to his opinion. You are at least respectful with your responses toward him but I see others bashing him for low estimates yet don’t see that same stance being taken toward some of the height inflators here
rawdshaq said on 17/Feb/19
I think we can all come to agree that he is currently about 6'6". Maybe a little over or a little under is a possibility. At his peak he could have been anything from 6'6 1/2" - 6'9". Lol
I think we can all come to agree that he is currently about 6'6". Maybe a little over or a little under is a possibility. At his peak he could have been anything from 6'6 1/2" - 6'9". Lol
Sotiris Gravas said on 17/Feb/19
@edwards and Philip McMullin
You both said you never saw Sid being taller than Taker in a staredown.
1) Here's Sid being taller than Taker in a staredown: Click Here This pic has already been posted by myself and others...
2) Here's another... Click Here
3) Yet another w/ footwear... Click Here
TBH, fellow poster Boss recently pointed out that Jesse Ventura said Hogan wore lifts in his boots, as revealed in the book "Sex, Lies, and Headlocks"... Click Here
If either Sid or Taker also wore hidden lifts to look taller, it wouldn't surprise me -- which makes figuring out their real height even more difficult. The same can be said for any wrestler, really.
@edwards and Philip McMullin
You both said you never saw Sid being taller than Taker in a staredown.
1) Here's Sid being taller than Taker in a staredown: Click Here This pic has already been posted by myself and others...
2) Here's another... Click Here
3) Yet another w/ footwear... Click Here
TBH, fellow poster Boss recently pointed out that Jesse Ventura said Hogan wore lifts in his boots, as revealed in the book "Sex, Lies, and Headlocks"... Click Here
If either Sid or Taker also wore hidden lifts to look taller, it wouldn't surprise me -- which makes figuring out their real height even more difficult. The same can be said for any wrestler, really.
edwards said on 17/Feb/19
@sotiris gravas dude taker was clearly more than inch taller than legit 6'6 or 6'6.5 guys at his peak.he has more than inch on 6'6 guys like viscera and sid that put him 6'7.5 at peak or even a hair over it.less than 6'7.5 at his peak is ridiculous and is hard to digest
@sotiris gravas dude taker was clearly more than inch taller than legit 6'6 or 6'6.5 guys at his peak.he has more than inch on 6'6 guys like viscera and sid that put him 6'7.5 at peak or even a hair over it.less than 6'7.5 at his peak is ridiculous and is hard to digest
exwards said on 16/Feb/19
@sotiris gravas rob is right,it is obvious that taker was 6'7 at peak.he was visibly taller than 6'6 guys like hogan and visera.
@sotiris gravas rob is right,it is obvious that taker was 6'7 at peak.he was visibly taller than 6'6 guys like hogan and visera.
edwards said on 16/Feb/19
sid was never taller than taker.i have not seen even one staredown where sid looks taller than taker.
sid was never taller than taker.i have not seen even one staredown where sid looks taller than taker.
rawdshaq said on 16/Feb/19
I think he was 6'8" at peak. Maybe 6'7
I think he was 6'8" at peak. Maybe 6'7
Philip McMullin said on 16/Feb/19
Sotiris Gravas There you are again.... claiming sid was taller than taker when in every taker sid staredown taker always came out taller.. with sid even in bigger boots
Sotiris Gravas There you are again.... claiming sid was taller than taker when in every taker sid staredown taker always came out taller.. with sid even in bigger boots
Sotiris Gravas said on 16/Feb/19
@JT I've actually seen that before. That's due to Hawk not being positioned directly in front of Ottman, giving the optical illusion of Ottman being taller. If you look here, you'll see that Fred Ottman looks exactly 6'3" next to 6'1" peak height Road Warrior Animal... Click Here
Tenta was around 6'4", but looks even taller in this pic due to being closer to the foreground.
Just for fun, here's Ottman having fun w/ some old friends... Click Here
Ottman was billed as 6'3". He's still 6'3" at age 62.
I recently noticed some cool Ernie Ladd pics that you posted online. You should include them here on CelebHeights for ppl to enjoy.
@JT I've actually seen that before. That's due to Hawk not being positioned directly in front of Ottman, giving the optical illusion of Ottman being taller. If you look here, you'll see that Fred Ottman looks exactly 6'3" next to 6'1" peak height Road Warrior Animal... Click Here
Tenta was around 6'4", but looks even taller in this pic due to being closer to the foreground.
Just for fun, here's Ottman having fun w/ some old friends... Click Here
Ottman was billed as 6'3". He's still 6'3" at age 62.
I recently noticed some cool Ernie Ladd pics that you posted online. You should include them here on CelebHeights for ppl to enjoy.
Canson said on 16/Feb/19
@Rawdshaq: that’s not a bad range that you provided 6’5.75-6’6.5. I wouldn’t think he’s as high as 6’6.5 today but somewhere around 6’6” whether the full 6’6 or a weak 6’6” fits
@Rawdshaq: that’s not a bad range that you provided 6’5.75-6’6.5. I wouldn’t think he’s as high as 6’6.5 today but somewhere around 6’6” whether the full 6’6 or a weak 6’6” fits
Sotiris Gravas said on 15/Feb/19
@Dan Trojan Maybe The Godfather was 6'4.5" peak, w/ Taker at 6'6.5" peak height. Reminder: Rob has Sid Eudy at 6'6.5" peak height, and Taker wasn't taller than him. For a 5'6" guy, you guess pretty good.
I don't understand why Rob the editor has Taker at 6'7.5" peak height when Sid was obviously slightly taller than him. It makes zero sense. My 2 cents...
@Dan Trojan Maybe The Godfather was 6'4.5" peak, w/ Taker at 6'6.5" peak height. Reminder: Rob has Sid Eudy at 6'6.5" peak height, and Taker wasn't taller than him. For a 5'6" guy, you guess pretty good.
I don't understand why Rob the editor has Taker at 6'7.5" peak height when Sid was obviously slightly taller than him. It makes zero sense. My 2 cents...
JT said on 15/Feb/19
Sotiris Gravas said on 12/Feb/19
Nailz and 6'2" Road Warrior Hawk (1994)... Click Here
You can’t have Road Warrior Hawk at 6’2” and Ottman at only 6’3”. Click Here
Sotiris Gravas said on 12/Feb/19
Nailz and 6'2" Road Warrior Hawk (1994)... Click Here
You can’t have Road Warrior Hawk at 6’2” and Ottman at only 6’3”. Click Here
edwards said on 15/Feb/19
taker wasnt 6'8 or atleast full 6'8 at peak.he was 6'7.5 or max 6'7.75 at peak.but ofcource you can rule out almost 6'8.taker at his tallest at circa 90s was maybe 6'7.75 or maybe 6'7.5 ,6'7 to 6'7.5 is more arguable than 6'7.5 to 6'8.
taker wasnt 6'8 or atleast full 6'8 at peak.he was 6'7.5 or max 6'7.75 at peak.but ofcource you can rule out almost 6'8.taker at his tallest at circa 90s was maybe 6'7.75 or maybe 6'7.5 ,6'7 to 6'7.5 is more arguable than 6'7.5 to 6'8.
Canson said on 15/Feb/19
I doubt Taker was ever the full 6’8 in the 90s. He only had 1.5-2” on Hogan. Absolute most I could buy was 6’7.5 maybe even 6’7.25. Today 6’6” maximum
I doubt Taker was ever the full 6’8 in the 90s. He only had 1.5-2” on Hogan. Absolute most I could buy was 6’7.5 maybe even 6’7.25. Today 6’6” maximum
rawdshaq said on 15/Feb/19
Everybody wore enhanced boots in the 90s. It may sound really stupid, but everybody could have been close to their billed height with their boots in the 90s. Undertaker 6'7 1/2", 6'9" - 6'10" with boots. Kane 6'8", 6'11" with HIS boots. I know it sounds silly but ?
Everybody wore enhanced boots in the 90s. It may sound really stupid, but everybody could have been close to their billed height with their boots in the 90s. Undertaker 6'7 1/2", 6'9" - 6'10" with boots. Kane 6'8", 6'11" with HIS boots. I know it sounds silly but ?
Dan Trojan said on 14/Feb/19
Sotiris i've seen charles wright in person to me he looked 6'5" i could be wrong though because being 5'6" i do sometimes get 6'4" and 6'5" guys mixed up and also he is closer to the camera in that pic and the undertaker is still taller of course that was when the undertaker was at his peak therefore more than likely his tallest
Sotiris i've seen charles wright in person to me he looked 6'5" i could be wrong though because being 5'6" i do sometimes get 6'4" and 6'5" guys mixed up and also he is closer to the camera in that pic and the undertaker is still taller of course that was when the undertaker was at his peak therefore more than likely his tallest
rawdshaq said on 14/Feb/19
1990 Undertaker: 6'8"
2000 Undertaker: 6'7"
2010 Undertaker: 6'6"
2020 Undertaker: 6'5"
What you guys think? Current Undertaker 6'5 3/4" - 6'6 1/2" . It's really hard to get someones like Undertaker height correctly. He's somewhere in that region, I just know it.
1990 Undertaker: 6'8"
2000 Undertaker: 6'7"
2010 Undertaker: 6'6"
2020 Undertaker: 6'5"
What you guys think? Current Undertaker 6'5 3/4" - 6'6 1/2" . It's really hard to get someones like Undertaker height correctly. He's somewhere in that region, I just know it.
Canson said on 13/Feb/19
@Christian: yep and I doubt Triple H is more than 6’1.25 maybe just 6’1” flat especially when Ali Baba guessed 6’1” too
@Christian: yep and I doubt Triple H is more than 6’1.25 maybe just 6’1” flat especially when Ali Baba guessed 6’1” too
Dan Trojan said on 13/Feb/19
Rawdshaq good one you have me laughing
Rawdshaq good one you have me laughing
rawdshaq said on 13/Feb/19
A 6'7 1/2" peak Kane could have been 6'10" with lifts. 6'10" + 2" = 7 feet, maybe that's how he got billed. I don't think Undertaker would be 6'7" today even with good posture, maybe 6'6 1/2" though, 6'7" with shoes.
A 6'7 1/2" peak Kane could have been 6'10" with lifts. 6'10" + 2" = 7 feet, maybe that's how he got billed. I don't think Undertaker would be 6'7" today even with good posture, maybe 6'6 1/2" though, 6'7" with shoes.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 13/Feb/19
@rawdshaq
Triple H's nothing over 6'1.5" if Undertaker's 6'6". There's an easy 4.5" difference between the two.
@rawdshaq
Triple H's nothing over 6'1.5" if Undertaker's 6'6". There's an easy 4.5" difference between the two.
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 13/Feb/19
Peak 6ft7.25 201cm today 6ft6 198cm barefoot.
Peak 6ft7.25 201cm today 6ft6 198cm barefoot.
rawdshaq said on 12/Feb/19
I'm done with all this arguing. All you guys do is post the same pictures and point out the same things over and over again. It's stupid. Here is some solid evidence that Undertaker is a legit 4'5".
Undertaker (right) with 7'0" peak Hornswoggle Click Here
Is Undertaker 6'6" there? No, looking 4'5" as always.
Undertaker w/ 4'11" Big Show Click Here
Again, looking MAYBE 4'5 1/2".
Undertaker w/ MAYBE 6'9" Rey Mysterio Click Here
Looking 4'5", again.
Last by not certainly not least, Undertaker w/ 3'9" PEAK Great Khali Click Here
Need more evidence that Undertaker is as low as 4'5" now? Didn't think so.
I'm done with all this arguing. All you guys do is post the same pictures and point out the same things over and over again. It's stupid. Here is some solid evidence that Undertaker is a legit 4'5".
Undertaker (right) with 7'0" peak Hornswoggle Click Here
Is Undertaker 6'6" there? No, looking 4'5" as always.
Undertaker w/ 4'11" Big Show Click Here
Again, looking MAYBE 4'5 1/2".
Undertaker w/ MAYBE 6'9" Rey Mysterio Click Here
Looking 4'5", again.
Last by not certainly not least, Undertaker w/ 3'9" PEAK Great Khali Click Here
Need more evidence that Undertaker is as low as 4'5" now? Didn't think so.
Shhahhshjgguydg said on 12/Feb/19
Honestly I guarantee you when standing straight TODAY he probably about 6'7... Once someone hit's a good 6'5, 6'6 it blend in with people up to 6'9...There's a stupid Youtube video of a High School kid who's 6'9 asking shorter people how tall they are...Anyways most people guess him between 6'4-6'7... Undertaker at his peak probably was 6'8 - 6'9..Most likely 6'8 1/2 and is why he was billed at 6'10 1/2 to 6'11 early in his career...2 inches is the magic number exaggeration number in wrestling.. Aside from Kane, Andre, and Giant Gonzalas...
Honestly I guarantee you when standing straight TODAY he probably about 6'7... Once someone hit's a good 6'5, 6'6 it blend in with people up to 6'9...There's a stupid Youtube video of a High School kid who's 6'9 asking shorter people how tall they are...Anyways most people guess him between 6'4-6'7... Undertaker at his peak probably was 6'8 - 6'9..Most likely 6'8 1/2 and is why he was billed at 6'10 1/2 to 6'11 early in his career...2 inches is the magic number exaggeration number in wrestling.. Aside from Kane, Andre, and Giant Gonzalas...
Sotiris Gravas said on 12/Feb/19
Taker and Nailz (1992)... Click Here , Click Here
Nailz and 6'2" Road Warrior Hawk (1994)... Click Here
Nailz, Scott Hall, and 6'4 Kamala (1992)... Click Here (Kamala is usually barefoot, but could have been in sandals here.)
Kamala (aka Sugar Bear) and Paul Bearer (aka Percy Pringle)... Click Here
Taker and Paul Bearer... Click Here
Taker and 6'4" barefoot Kamala... Click Here
Taker and 6'4" The Godfather (1989)... Click Here
Taker and Nailz (1992)... Click Here , Click Here
Nailz and 6'2" Road Warrior Hawk (1994)... Click Here
Nailz, Scott Hall, and 6'4 Kamala (1992)... Click Here (Kamala is usually barefoot, but could have been in sandals here.)
Kamala (aka Sugar Bear) and Paul Bearer (aka Percy Pringle)... Click Here
Taker and Paul Bearer... Click Here
Taker and 6'4" barefoot Kamala... Click Here
Taker and 6'4" The Godfather (1989)... Click Here
Sotiris Gravas said on 12/Feb/19
Flair and Undertaker (1992)... Click Here
Flair and Earthquake (1992)... Click Here
Flair and 6'3" Rick Rude (1991)... Click Here
Earthquake and 6'2" Jim Duggan (1990)... Click Here
Earthquake and 6'2" Sting... Click Here
6'2" Sting and 6'3" Rude (1994)... Click Here
Sting and Hogan (1994)... Click Here
Flair and Undertaker (1992)... Click Here
Flair and Earthquake (1992)... Click Here
Flair and 6'3" Rick Rude (1991)... Click Here
Earthquake and 6'2" Jim Duggan (1990)... Click Here
Earthquake and 6'2" Sting... Click Here
6'2" Sting and 6'3" Rude (1994)... Click Here
Sting and Hogan (1994)... Click Here
Vegas' said on 12/Feb/19
@Tree another of HHH and Taker from 2009. I actually met Taker previous night in Belfast Click Here
With Big Show though HHH and Taker have high camera angle advantage Click Here
@Tree another of HHH and Taker from 2009. I actually met Taker previous night in Belfast Click Here
With Big Show though HHH and Taker have high camera angle advantage Click Here
edwards said on 11/Feb/19
maybe taker's weight is around 275-285 lbs
maybe taker's weight is around 275-285 lbs
rawdshaq said on 11/Feb/19
@Tree It looks about the same. Brock 6'2 1/4" Triple H 6'2 1/2" with 6'6" Undertaker
@Tree It looks about the same. Brock 6'2 1/4" Triple H 6'2 1/2" with 6'6" Undertaker
brosofdestruction said on 11/Feb/19
As far as weight, definitely only in 270-280 range. It really sucks that was the only photographer they had because the lens really does make him look bigger than he is. You can search pictures from his gun show appearance last month and see how thinner he is in videos from it as well compared to a photo booth.
As far as weight, definitely only in 270-280 range. It really sucks that was the only photographer they had because the lens really does make him look bigger than he is. You can search pictures from his gun show appearance last month and see how thinner he is in videos from it as well compared to a photo booth.
Canson said on 11/Feb/19
Kane is taller than Taker today
Kane is taller than Taker today
Dan Trojan said on 11/Feb/19
Brosofdestruction i always thought he was less than that i would've guessed 270-80 how much would you say he weighed
Brosofdestruction i always thought he was less than that i would've guessed 270-80 how much would you say he weighed
rawdshaq said on 11/Feb/19
How much do you guys think Undertaker weighs? At his peak and now, maybe 320 at peak, and 285 now?
How much do you guys think Undertaker weighs? At his peak and now, maybe 320 at peak, and 285 now?
tree said on 11/Feb/19
Any idea why Triple h stacked up so well in 2009 with Taker but Brock not in 2014? Click Here Click Here
Any idea why Triple h stacked up so well in 2009 with Taker but Brock not in 2014? Click Here Click Here
edwards said on 10/Feb/19
i wouldn't be surprised if taker measured full 6'6,in only max lowest condition he could drop below 6'6.the max lowest i can possibly see is 6'5.75
i wouldn't be surprised if taker measured full 6'6,in only max lowest condition he could drop below 6'6.the max lowest i can possibly see is 6'5.75
brosofdestruction said on 10/Feb/19
- Again, if I’m going to lie about my height I would say I’m taller since my posture looks better than Takers! So chill on the doubts people. He isn’t above 6’6 flat. So if that crushes people’s image of him, it is what it is.
- Also, there are a lot of pictures of just the two of them from the campaign event last March and you can clearly see Taker’s head higher than Kane, but Kane’s shoulders are higher. Just because WWE advertised them to be 6’10.5 doesn’t make me shorter or them as big as you want them to be in real life!
- I also went to the vip dinner afterwards limited to 40 people and talked to them, which didn’t allow private photos (but my brother did snap a quick one in the distance), we are not side by side in it so it’s irrelevant here.
- One last thing, it was a photographer with a wide angle lens. If you actually know photography, the lenses choice actually makes him look bigger than he actually is in reality due to being on the edge of the frame. (My brother is to the right of me and then Kane not shown for his privacy for now). I weight 230, Taker is not 295!
- Again, if I’m going to lie about my height I would say I’m taller since my posture looks better than Takers! So chill on the doubts people. He isn’t above 6’6 flat. So if that crushes people’s image of him, it is what it is.
- Also, there are a lot of pictures of just the two of them from the campaign event last March and you can clearly see Taker’s head higher than Kane, but Kane’s shoulders are higher. Just because WWE advertised them to be 6’10.5 doesn’t make me shorter or them as big as you want them to be in real life!
- I also went to the vip dinner afterwards limited to 40 people and talked to them, which didn’t allow private photos (but my brother did snap a quick one in the distance), we are not side by side in it so it’s irrelevant here.
- One last thing, it was a photographer with a wide angle lens. If you actually know photography, the lenses choice actually makes him look bigger than he actually is in reality due to being on the edge of the frame. (My brother is to the right of me and then Kane not shown for his privacy for now). I weight 230, Taker is not 295!
Canson said on 10/Feb/19
@Brosofdestruction: I lose 3/4” to 2cm throughout the day but 1/3-3/8” is within the first hour of being awake from being a mm or so over 6’5 out of bed. but generally after that first hour it’s anywhere from 3/8” to 4/9” that I lose thereafter depending on whether I go to the gym that day. I’m only about 2cm taller than you at a very strong 6’4.25 to 6’4.3.
I on the other hand do not wish to be taller as 6’4” is very tall but not too tall
@Brosofdestruction: I lose 3/4” to 2cm throughout the day but 1/3-3/8” is within the first hour of being awake from being a mm or so over 6’5 out of bed. but generally after that first hour it’s anywhere from 3/8” to 4/9” that I lose thereafter depending on whether I go to the gym that day. I’m only about 2cm taller than you at a very strong 6’4.25 to 6’4.3.
I on the other hand do not wish to be taller as 6’4” is very tall but not too tall
Canson said on 10/Feb/19
@184guy: the angle looks odd. I take his word tho unless he falls to 6’3” like you said. Taker struggled to look 6’6.5 with Ali Baba years ago and today is likely even less although not 6’5 like guys here are saying. I think 6’6” if he stands straight
@184guy: the angle looks odd. I take his word tho unless he falls to 6’3” like you said. Taker struggled to look 6’6.5 with Ali Baba years ago and today is likely even less although not 6’5 like guys here are saying. I think 6’6” if he stands straight
K123 said on 10/Feb/19
@brosofdestruction; so kane is only 6'5...lol...wwe exaggerates too much
@brosofdestruction; so kane is only 6'5...lol...wwe exaggerates too much
rawdshaq said on 9/Feb/19
@Sotiris That dude mentioned that he didn't stay for long and it could have been the way he was standing. But we have a picture of a 6'3 1/2" guy standing right next to Undertaker and a slightly slouching Taker still looks 3 inches taller. There is no way Undertaker is 6'5". He is at least 6'6".
@Sotiris That dude mentioned that he didn't stay for long and it could have been the way he was standing. But we have a picture of a 6'3 1/2" guy standing right next to Undertaker and a slightly slouching Taker still looks 3 inches taller. There is no way Undertaker is 6'5". He is at least 6'6".
JaseminesKing said on 9/Feb/19
i knew mark before he was famous. he was a basketball player, and he was 6'9. he weighed 270lb.
i knew mark before he was famous. he was a basketball player, and he was 6'9. he weighed 270lb.
Publc Enemy said on 9/Feb/19
Peak 202 cms
Current 199.5 cms
Peak 202 cms
Current 199.5 cms
Canson said on 9/Feb/19
@Dan Trojan: I’ve always maintained that Taker could be 6’6” still today but no higher. The chances of over 6’6” flat are less likely than 6’5.5 or .75. But what the poster said is more credible than someone claiming he’s 6’4” which is foolish and he did provide pictures. If he’s really 6’4” it means that he has lost 3” or more as I think he was 6’7.25/201 peak and if he had lost all of that he would not be wrestling anymore or even associated with it. When Ali Baba met him he was still taller than Ali Baba at around 6’6-6’7 range as Ali stated. My personal guess is that he was 6’6.5 at best or 199 at worst when they met
@Dan Trojan: I’ve always maintained that Taker could be 6’6” still today but no higher. The chances of over 6’6” flat are less likely than 6’5.5 or .75. But what the poster said is more credible than someone claiming he’s 6’4” which is foolish and he did provide pictures. If he’s really 6’4” it means that he has lost 3” or more as I think he was 6’7.25/201 peak and if he had lost all of that he would not be wrestling anymore or even associated with it. When Ali Baba met him he was still taller than Ali Baba at around 6’6-6’7 range as Ali stated. My personal guess is that he was 6’6.5 at best or 199 at worst when they met
Canson said on 9/Feb/19
@Dan Trojan: I’ve always maintained that Taker could be 6’6” still today but no higher. The chances of over 6’6” flat are less likely than 6’5.5 or .75. But what the poster said is more credible than someone claiming he’s 6’4” which is foolish and he did provide pictures. If he’s really 6’4” it means that he has lost over 3” and if he had lost all of that he would not be wrestling anymore or even associated with it. When Ali Baba met him he was still taller than Ali Baba at around 6’6-6’7 range as Ali stated. My personal guess is that he was 6’6.5 at best or 199 at worst when they met
@Dan Trojan: I’ve always maintained that Taker could be 6’6” still today but no higher. The chances of over 6’6” flat are less likely than 6’5.5 or .75. But what the poster said is more credible than someone claiming he’s 6’4” which is foolish and he did provide pictures. If he’s really 6’4” it means that he has lost over 3” and if he had lost all of that he would not be wrestling anymore or even associated with it. When Ali Baba met him he was still taller than Ali Baba at around 6’6-6’7 range as Ali stated. My personal guess is that he was 6’6.5 at best or 199 at worst when they met
brosofdestruction said on 9/Feb/19
Roughly 1/4in over the day difference. And if I wanted to lie about my height I would much prefer to be taller! (And in return that would make Mark closer to his billed height lol).
Roughly 1/4in over the day difference. And if I wanted to lie about my height I would much prefer to be taller! (And in return that would make Mark closer to his billed height lol).
rawdshaq said on 9/Feb/19
@brosofdestruction Wow. Undertaker looks every bit of 6'6" in those pictures. He looks great, too. Maybe he might still be 6'6 1/2" today with good posture. I'm starting to think as low as 6'5" flat is impossible for him. After that picture dude, I have upgraded Undertaker to 6'6 1/4".
@brosofdestruction Wow. Undertaker looks every bit of 6'6" in those pictures. He looks great, too. Maybe he might still be 6'6 1/2" today with good posture. I'm starting to think as low as 6'5" flat is impossible for him. After that picture dude, I have upgraded Undertaker to 6'6 1/4".
Canson said on 8/Feb/19
@Sotiris: I can agree with Brosofdestruction. I’ve always advocated 6’6” for Taker being a best case if he straightened up his posture and 6’5.5 a worst case. It’s clear that it’s not good meaning his posture. Similar theme to Hulk Hogan. Kevin Love May be a hair over 6’7” honestly. 6’7.5 is a best case to me but it could also be posture. Maybe his wasn’t as good as Love’s. If you go back a couple pages to when Ali Baba met him Taker was still close rob rob’s listing then. Today he’s likely just a flat 6’6” at best. But remember that most of us have said 6’5.75 is possible. It is since that’s only 1/4” off what he gauges him at but either way it’s much closer to 6’6” than 6’5”.
@Sotiris: I can agree with Brosofdestruction. I’ve always advocated 6’6” for Taker being a best case if he straightened up his posture and 6’5.5 a worst case. It’s clear that it’s not good meaning his posture. Similar theme to Hulk Hogan. Kevin Love May be a hair over 6’7” honestly. 6’7.5 is a best case to me but it could also be posture. Maybe his wasn’t as good as Love’s. If you go back a couple pages to when Ali Baba met him Taker was still close rob rob’s listing then. Today he’s likely just a flat 6’6” at best. But remember that most of us have said 6’5.75 is possible. It is since that’s only 1/4” off what he gauges him at but either way it’s much closer to 6’6” than 6’5”.
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 8/Feb/19
6ft3.5 192cm plus 7.5cm 3inches taker 6ft6 1/2 199.5cm.
6ft3.5 192cm plus 7.5cm 3inches taker 6ft6 1/2 199.5cm.
184guy2 said on 8/Feb/19
@brosofdestruction
If you are really 6'3.5 , takers still looks close to 6'6.5
Unless you are 6'3 in reality , than 6'6 is possible . BTW , strange position that you had with him
@brosofdestruction
If you are really 6'3.5 , takers still looks close to 6'6.5
Unless you are 6'3 in reality , than 6'6 is possible . BTW , strange position that you had with him
tree said on 8/Feb/19
not even half inch lost?
U should measure yourself out of bed i bet u would be over 6ft4,then 1 hour later then again in the afternoon.
not even half inch lost?
U should measure yourself out of bed i bet u would be over 6ft4,then 1 hour later then again in the afternoon.
Dan Trojan said on 8/Feb/19
Sotiris maybe the reason people are ignoring the one guy's comment because he's saying it and has no proof it's just here say while brosofdestruction has a photo you're right though he might not be the height he claims i thought the same thing but he has a photo so at this point we're just taking his word for it
Sotiris maybe the reason people are ignoring the one guy's comment because he's saying it and has no proof it's just here say while brosofdestruction has a photo you're right though he might not be the height he claims i thought the same thing but he has a photo so at this point we're just taking his word for it
edwards said on 8/Feb/19
Ashley123 tbh i know what are you saying but i have to be honest anything over 6'6 seems impossible for taker but i know he aint low like flat 6'5.i personally think that 6'5.75 to weak 6'6 is possible.
Ashley123 tbh i know what are you saying but i have to be honest anything over 6'6 seems impossible for taker but i know he aint low like flat 6'5.i personally think that 6'5.75 to weak 6'6 is possible.
edwards said on 7/Feb/19
he canbe any where from 6'5.75 to weak 6'6
he canbe any where from 6'5.75 to weak 6'6
brosofdestruction said on 7/Feb/19
- I don’t really lose anything throughout the day, so I’m a strong 6’3.5 all the time. I watch my posture and keep active.
- My brother had the picture with Kane, so I would have to get that permission to post some other time.
- As for heights, Taker’s head makes him maybe an inch taller than Kane, but Kane’s shoulder are slightly higher.
- NO joking, I was the tallest person to meet him that day, and I actually noticed him straighten up a bit next to me before the pics were taken. So there’s a slight lower height confidence for him now.
- If he had a normal length neck and head, he wouldn’t be much taller than me as you can see by our waists, elbows and chests lining up. 6’6 with his normal stance flat, and 6’7 peak no doubt. If I would have wore my cowboy boots that day (which put me slightly over 6’5) it would have been more obvious, but I specifically wanted to get our heights next to each other for the picture for my own life long wonder, so I just wore casual.
- I don’t really lose anything throughout the day, so I’m a strong 6’3.5 all the time. I watch my posture and keep active.
- My brother had the picture with Kane, so I would have to get that permission to post some other time.
- As for heights, Taker’s head makes him maybe an inch taller than Kane, but Kane’s shoulder are slightly higher.
- NO joking, I was the tallest person to meet him that day, and I actually noticed him straighten up a bit next to me before the pics were taken. So there’s a slight lower height confidence for him now.
- If he had a normal length neck and head, he wouldn’t be much taller than me as you can see by our waists, elbows and chests lining up. 6’6 with his normal stance flat, and 6’7 peak no doubt. If I would have wore my cowboy boots that day (which put me slightly over 6’5) it would have been more obvious, but I specifically wanted to get our heights next to each other for the picture for my own life long wonder, so I just wore casual.
Sotiris Gravas said on 7/Feb/19
I think it's funny how everybody gets super excited about brosofdestruction's pic, even though we have no idea if he's in fact the height he claims... despite the fact that we see that Taker is only 6'5" next to 100% 6'7" Kevin Love.
Also, when a guy like OJordanGravy says that Taker isn't 6'6", ppl pay no attention to his comment. Come on, guys... SMH
That being said, nice pic w/ Taker, brosofdestruction.
I think it's funny how everybody gets super excited about brosofdestruction's pic, even though we have no idea if he's in fact the height he claims... despite the fact that we see that Taker is only 6'5" next to 100% 6'7" Kevin Love.
Also, when a guy like OJordanGravy says that Taker isn't 6'6", ppl pay no attention to his comment. Come on, guys... SMH
That being said, nice pic w/ Taker, brosofdestruction.
edwards said on 7/Feb/19
@sotiris gravas holycow dude you wanna prove that taker is 6'5 .now again,you tried to say or you wanna tell that taker is under 6'5 LOL.taker being under 6'5 .jesus christ give me a break.dont get me wrong dude,its just hard to digest that taker being 6'5 or under it.maybe you have your opinion but personally i think 6'5.75 is possible.
@sotiris gravas holycow dude you wanna prove that taker is 6'5 .now again,you tried to say or you wanna tell that taker is under 6'5 LOL.taker being under 6'5 .jesus christ give me a break.dont get me wrong dude,its just hard to digest that taker being 6'5 or under it.maybe you have your opinion but personally i think 6'5.75 is possible.
NCL said on 7/Feb/19
@brosofdestruction
What an awesome picture! Do you have one of Kane too? I'm going to be that nerdy fan: What were they like? Did you get to talk to them?
Out of curiousity, what would you say for peak height for both?
@brosofdestruction
What an awesome picture! Do you have one of Kane too? I'm going to be that nerdy fan: What were they like? Did you get to talk to them?
Out of curiousity, what would you say for peak height for both?
Canson said on 6/Feb/19
@brosofdestruction: that’s where I have him no more than 6’6” and Ali Baba never ruled out a flat 6’6”. Do you measure the 6’3.5 at a low in the afternoon?
@brosofdestruction: that’s where I have him no more than 6’6” and Ali Baba never ruled out a flat 6’6”. Do you measure the 6’3.5 at a low in the afternoon?
Canson said on 6/Feb/19
@Sotiris: Chandler is closer to the camera than Camby
@Sotiris: Chandler is closer to the camera than Camby
Ashley123 said on 6/Feb/19
brosofdestruction.
This picture shows his problems with Posture.
His Knees are in BAD condition, probably worse than his Hips.
His posture is terrible, comparing to yours.
But he's still 6'6, or even little bit more if he can stand really good.
brosofdestruction.
This picture shows his problems with Posture.
His Knees are in BAD condition, probably worse than his Hips.
His posture is terrible, comparing to yours.
But he's still 6'6, or even little bit more if he can stand really good.
Lyle said on 6/Feb/19
@brosofdestruction who was taller then Kane or Taker?
@brosofdestruction who was taller then Kane or Taker?
Undertaker Frank said on 6/Feb/19
Brosofdestruction, Taker looks like he has you by 3 inches so he might be 6ft 6.5 which makes sense because he looked alittle taller than Ali Baba who is 6ft 6
Brosofdestruction, Taker looks like he has you by 3 inches so he might be 6ft 6.5 which makes sense because he looked alittle taller than Ali Baba who is 6ft 6
edwards said on 6/Feb/19
@ rob i am very sorry to disturb and ask you question very often but lets cut to chase.have you looked the photo posted by poster brosofdestruction.the dude said he is 6'3.5 and the dude has similar proportion to taker or simply taker has similar proportion to the dude.both have same proportion.You can clearly see their elbows, and waists line up, and the dude is somewhat further back from camera as you can see by his chest.the only consideration is takers forehead which is huge.considering this,is it possible that taker is 6'5.75 currently?would you buy 6'5.75 for taker currently?i know he aint low as flat 6'5 currently but imho he is 6'5.75,i hoped you watched the photo between the dude and taker,what is your opinion?
@ rob i am very sorry to disturb and ask you question very often but lets cut to chase.have you looked the photo posted by poster brosofdestruction.the dude said he is 6'3.5 and the dude has similar proportion to taker or simply taker has similar proportion to the dude.both have same proportion.You can clearly see their elbows, and waists line up, and the dude is somewhat further back from camera as you can see by his chest.the only consideration is takers forehead which is huge.considering this,is it possible that taker is 6'5.75 currently?would you buy 6'5.75 for taker currently?i know he aint low as flat 6'5 currently but imho he is 6'5.75,i hoped you watched the photo between the dude and taker,what is your opinion?
edwards said on 6/Feb/19
@ brosofdestruction yes dude taker maybe 6'5.75 currently
@ brosofdestruction yes dude taker maybe 6'5.75 currently
Sotiris Gravas said on 6/Feb/19
@OJordanGravy I believe you, dude. He might be slightly under 6'5", or maybe it was his poor posture, but there's no way he's anything over 6'5" now. The pics w/ 6'7" Kevin Love and Tristan Thompson prove that beyond a shadow of a doubt. Anybody who thinks he's 6'6" or more now is just fooling himself.
@ced Here's an old pic of Taker and Nash... Click Here Nash was never more than 6'9".
6'6.5" peak height Sid and Nash staredown (1999)... Click Here
Sid and 6'4.5" Hogan staredown... Click Here
Here's Taker and Papa Shango (billed 6'6") in 1992... Click Here
Taker next to Papa Shango... both tiptoeing way in back... Click Here 6'2" peak height Jim Duggan up front. Slick was billed as 6'4"; Hulk Hogan said in an interview that Slick was 6'3"...
6'1.5" Mark Henry and height-loss The Godfather (aka Papa Shango), 2018... Click Here
@OJordanGravy I believe you, dude. He might be slightly under 6'5", or maybe it was his poor posture, but there's no way he's anything over 6'5" now. The pics w/ 6'7" Kevin Love and Tristan Thompson prove that beyond a shadow of a doubt. Anybody who thinks he's 6'6" or more now is just fooling himself.
@ced Here's an old pic of Taker and Nash... Click Here Nash was never more than 6'9".
6'6.5" peak height Sid and Nash staredown (1999)... Click Here
Sid and 6'4.5" Hogan staredown... Click Here
Here's Taker and Papa Shango (billed 6'6") in 1992... Click Here
Taker next to Papa Shango... both tiptoeing way in back... Click Here 6'2" peak height Jim Duggan up front. Slick was billed as 6'4"; Hulk Hogan said in an interview that Slick was 6'3"...
6'1.5" Mark Henry and height-loss The Godfather (aka Papa Shango), 2018... Click Here
edwards said on 5/Feb/19
@ o jordan gravy
dude maybe you thought taker to be 6'4 or so on because he wasnt standing straight.you should also think that that taker has develop horrible posture throughout the years.i aint trying to upgrade or anything but imho 6'4 is too low for him.he is atleast 6'5.75,maybe he was slouching when you saw him.and bty you said you has eye to eye on him ,but taker probably has a low eye level and big forehead that need to be taken into account.
@ o jordan gravy
dude maybe you thought taker to be 6'4 or so on because he wasnt standing straight.you should also think that that taker has develop horrible posture throughout the years.i aint trying to upgrade or anything but imho 6'4 is too low for him.he is atleast 6'5.75,maybe he was slouching when you saw him.and bty you said you has eye to eye on him ,but taker probably has a low eye level and big forehead that need to be taken into account.
Canson said on 5/Feb/19
@Vegas: I don’t rule out Shaq having shrunken since that pic was taken. He hasn’t played in years and that was before Lebron left the first time from Cleveland. That was either 09 or 10. Either way 6’11” flat seems low. But we have to consider that Lebron has worse posture in the pic and it’s possible Lebron doesn’t measure that height for a low. Carmelo doesn’t look a full inch or 1.25” shorter than Lebron and Melo is only a 6’6 or 6’6.25 guy himself in person. He’s right in the 198-199 range. While 6’11 flat may be stretching it Shaq may have dipped under 7’0” in his prime by a hair to something like 6’11.75. He always looked 2” shorter than Kareem and an inch less than Chamberlin
@Vegas: I don’t rule out Shaq having shrunken since that pic was taken. He hasn’t played in years and that was before Lebron left the first time from Cleveland. That was either 09 or 10. Either way 6’11” flat seems low. But we have to consider that Lebron has worse posture in the pic and it’s possible Lebron doesn’t measure that height for a low. Carmelo doesn’t look a full inch or 1.25” shorter than Lebron and Melo is only a 6’6 or 6’6.25 guy himself in person. He’s right in the 198-199 range. While 6’11 flat may be stretching it Shaq may have dipped under 7’0” in his prime by a hair to something like 6’11.75. He always looked 2” shorter than Kareem and an inch less than Chamberlin
Canson said on 5/Feb/19
@Sotiris: that’s assuming Strawberry is still 6’5” today. He was at his peak
@Sotiris: that’s assuming Strawberry is still 6’5” today. He was at his peak
brosofdestruction said on 5/Feb/19
Time to finally put this to rest. I met Taker and Kane in march of 2018 at Glenn’s campaign event. We are both wearing similar shoes and pants. You can clearly see our elbows, and waists line up, and I’m even somewhat further back from camera as you can see by his chest.
Most importantly. I am 6’3.5 barefoot. So take into account our matching proportions otherwise besides just his giant head. And Taker is no more than 6’6 bare currently.
[Photo Here](Click Here)
Time to finally put this to rest. I met Taker and Kane in march of 2018 at Glenn’s campaign event. We are both wearing similar shoes and pants. You can clearly see our elbows, and waists line up, and I’m even somewhat further back from camera as you can see by his chest.
Most importantly. I am 6’3.5 barefoot. So take into account our matching proportions otherwise besides just his giant head. And Taker is no more than 6’6 bare currently.
[Photo Here](Click Here)
rawdshaq said on 5/Feb/19
@Sotiris Sid was 6'8" at his peak and also Undertaker doesn't even look any shorter than him and in fact sometimes he does look taller so yeah 6'8" peak Undertaker is a good bet or maybe 6'7"
@Sotiris Sid was 6'8" at his peak and also Undertaker doesn't even look any shorter than him and in fact sometimes he does look taller so yeah 6'8" peak Undertaker is a good bet or maybe 6'7"
OJordanGravy said on 4/Feb/19
just need to share a story for everybody here. and i want to promise everybody that undertaker is not as tall as people think he is. i have met and seen the undertaker at an airport just back in 2018 which is last year. he looks very old, a lot older than he is seen on TV. i am 6'4", i wear vans, and i was eye to eye with the undertaker and he was wearing boots. there is no way he is 6'6 and a half" and i dont even want to say it because it is a little bit of a scary thought but it is possible that undertaker is lower than 6'5", like 6'4" my height. i didnt stay too long so maybe it was the way he was standing i dont know but my only encounter with the deadman he did not look that tall. i know i am used to being taller than people but did not expect to be the same height as him. and tbh, i didnt even recognize him until i looked at him for a little bit longer because he looked so old and short (for someone who is supposed to be really tall)
just need to share a story for everybody here. and i want to promise everybody that undertaker is not as tall as people think he is. i have met and seen the undertaker at an airport just back in 2018 which is last year. he looks very old, a lot older than he is seen on TV. i am 6'4", i wear vans, and i was eye to eye with the undertaker and he was wearing boots. there is no way he is 6'6 and a half" and i dont even want to say it because it is a little bit of a scary thought but it is possible that undertaker is lower than 6'5", like 6'4" my height. i didnt stay too long so maybe it was the way he was standing i dont know but my only encounter with the deadman he did not look that tall. i know i am used to being taller than people but did not expect to be the same height as him. and tbh, i didnt even recognize him until i looked at him for a little bit longer because he looked so old and short (for someone who is supposed to be really tall)
Vegas' said on 4/Feb/19
The red line indicates where the top of a 6'7+ barefoot measured guy like Lebrons head should be if Shaq is approx flat 6'11 Click Here
The red line indicates where the top of a 6'7+ barefoot measured guy like Lebrons head should be if Shaq is approx flat 6'11 Click Here
Sotiris Gravas said on 4/Feb/19
@rawdshaq Sid Eudy always had at least 0.25" on Taker... Click Here
If Sid Eudy's peak height was indeed 6'6.5" (what Rob has him at), then Taker's peak height was 6'6.25". I can't see how Taker was possibly 1" taller or more than Sid's peak height. It's simply not possible. I don't think Undertaker was ever more than 6'6.5".
Taker and 5'10" THK... Click Here , Click Here
Sid and THK... Click Here
Sid and around 6'4.5" Hogan... Click Here
Sid and around 6'3" Robert Fuller... Click Here
Sid and 6'2.5" Vader... Click Here
@rawdshaq Sid Eudy always had at least 0.25" on Taker... Click Here
If Sid Eudy's peak height was indeed 6'6.5" (what Rob has him at), then Taker's peak height was 6'6.25". I can't see how Taker was possibly 1" taller or more than Sid's peak height. It's simply not possible. I don't think Undertaker was ever more than 6'6.5".
Taker and 5'10" THK... Click Here , Click Here
Sid and THK... Click Here
Sid and around 6'4.5" Hogan... Click Here
Sid and around 6'3" Robert Fuller... Click Here
Sid and 6'2.5" Vader... Click Here
Canson said on 4/Feb/19
@Rawdshaq: there’s a better chance that he would measure 6’7-6’7.5 than 6’7.5-6’8. He was more like a peak Magic Johnson around 201cm
@Rawdshaq: there’s a better chance that he would measure 6’7-6’7.5 than 6’7.5-6’8. He was more like a peak Magic Johnson around 201cm
ced said on 4/Feb/19
Sotiris, if you believe that Kevin Nash was 6'9.5 in his prime, or close to 6'10, Taker was 6'8 in his prime for sure. He had to have been. Their WrestleMania 11 staredown, only 1.5 inches between them.
Forward to WM14, Taker-Kane staredown, Kane (in his monster boots) had Taker by 2 - 2.5 inches. Taker was was 6'7.5 (lost half an inch from his peak), Kane was 6'8 - 6'8.25, in his monster boots, 6'9.75.
They're in their 50s today, and it's not uncommon that they've lost each 1.5 - 1.75 inches inches of height. Taker today is 6'5.75, Kane 6'6.25
Sotiris, if you believe that Kevin Nash was 6'9.5 in his prime, or close to 6'10, Taker was 6'8 in his prime for sure. He had to have been. Their WrestleMania 11 staredown, only 1.5 inches between them.
Forward to WM14, Taker-Kane staredown, Kane (in his monster boots) had Taker by 2 - 2.5 inches. Taker was was 6'7.5 (lost half an inch from his peak), Kane was 6'8 - 6'8.25, in his monster boots, 6'9.75.
They're in their 50s today, and it's not uncommon that they've lost each 1.5 - 1.75 inches inches of height. Taker today is 6'5.75, Kane 6'6.25
rawdshaq said on 4/Feb/19
@Sotirous Just curious, how tall do you think Undertaker was at his peak height? I think he was 6'7 1/2 - 6'8"
@Sotirous Just curious, how tall do you think Undertaker was at his peak height? I think he was 6'7 1/2 - 6'8"
Sotiris Gravas said on 4/Feb/19
@Ozzy Here's Grizz looking 6'9" (thanks in part to the lean) next to maybe 6'0" Dr. Oz (2009): Click Here
Now he looks gigantic... Click Here
He looks as tall as Shaq did w/ Oz (2019)... Click Here
I think Grizz might be a lift-wearer...
Here's Oz w/ 6'5" Darryl Strawberry (2017)... Click Here
Strawberry/Oz (2018)... Click Here
Oz and the Tallest Man in America, 7ft 8.33in Igor Vovkovinkiy (2010)... Click Here
How does one explain a supposedly 6'9" Grizz next to Marcus Camby... Click Here when Camby really is around 6'9" w/ Tyson Chandler...? Click Here I guess Camby was tiptoeing as a joke... same goes for the Steve Buscemi pic I previously posted.
I used to think Shaq was 6'11" now, but 6'11.5" seems more likely. That said, I do think the custom-made sneaks he wore had big heels that made him look taller than he actually was:
Click Here Those were some BIG heels... Click Here
@Ozzy Here's Grizz looking 6'9" (thanks in part to the lean) next to maybe 6'0" Dr. Oz (2009): Click Here
Now he looks gigantic... Click Here
He looks as tall as Shaq did w/ Oz (2019)... Click Here
I think Grizz might be a lift-wearer...
Here's Oz w/ 6'5" Darryl Strawberry (2017)... Click Here
Strawberry/Oz (2018)... Click Here
Oz and the Tallest Man in America, 7ft 8.33in Igor Vovkovinkiy (2010)... Click Here
How does one explain a supposedly 6'9" Grizz next to Marcus Camby... Click Here when Camby really is around 6'9" w/ Tyson Chandler...? Click Here I guess Camby was tiptoeing as a joke... same goes for the Steve Buscemi pic I previously posted.
I used to think Shaq was 6'11" now, but 6'11.5" seems more likely. That said, I do think the custom-made sneaks he wore had big heels that made him look taller than he actually was:
Click Here Those were some BIG heels... Click Here
Ashley123 said on 4/Feb/19
Sylvia and Taker video is from 2003 (UFC 42), Taker was soli 6'7 back then still.
Sylvia and Taker video is from 2003 (UFC 42), Taker was soli 6'7 back then still.
Ozzy said on 4/Feb/19
@Sotiris Gravas said on 3/Feb/19...
Yeah some good pics there mate.
Yeah Grizz height has me puzzled lol. Biggest fluctuations. Sometimes he seems 6'7" & others 6'10"?... I think he is probably about 6'9" and as most that height just claim a 7'footer.
Shaq I think is around the 7' in shoes. 6'11" actual height. Huge guy though.
I would like to hear what others think about Grizz Chapmans height ?
@Sotiris Gravas said on 3/Feb/19...
Yeah some good pics there mate.
Yeah Grizz height has me puzzled lol. Biggest fluctuations. Sometimes he seems 6'7" & others 6'10"?... I think he is probably about 6'9" and as most that height just claim a 7'footer.
Shaq I think is around the 7' in shoes. 6'11" actual height. Huge guy though.
I would like to hear what others think about Grizz Chapmans height ?
rawdshaq said on 3/Feb/19
In boots Undertaker in his prime was probably 6'9" if he was 6'7 1/2" barefoot which is what he has from me. If he really is 6'5 1/2" today then he could have 6'6".
To be exact and I know I sound like a broken record but 6'5 1/2" today, 6'7 1/2" peak
In boots Undertaker in his prime was probably 6'9" if he was 6'7 1/2" barefoot which is what he has from me. If he really is 6'5 1/2" today then he could have 6'6".
To be exact and I know I sound like a broken record but 6'5 1/2" today, 6'7 1/2" peak
Sotiris Gravas said on 3/Feb/19
@Ozzy Sorry I forgot to post the Camby/Chandler pic... here it is... Click Here
@Dan Trojan I hear you dude. That video w/ Sylvia was from 2011, not exactly this year. We don't know what the footwear was. That said, 6'5" for Taker is for now, not then. Also, it's just my guess, meaning I could be wrong.
@Ozzy Sorry I forgot to post the Camby/Chandler pic... here it is... Click Here
@Dan Trojan I hear you dude. That video w/ Sylvia was from 2011, not exactly this year. We don't know what the footwear was. That said, 6'5" for Taker is for now, not then. Also, it's just my guess, meaning I could be wrong.
Xpax99 said on 3/Feb/19
I don’t understand why viscera was 6ft 6 1/2 and undertaker was 6ft 7 1/2... viscera always 1 inch shorter than taker in prime, but he had more footware advantage like kane boots. with those boots viscera had to have the same height of taker, but still shorter. If viscera Was 6 ft 6 1/2, taker probably 6 ft 8
I don’t understand why viscera was 6ft 6 1/2 and undertaker was 6ft 7 1/2... viscera always 1 inch shorter than taker in prime, but he had more footware advantage like kane boots. with those boots viscera had to have the same height of taker, but still shorter. If viscera Was 6 ft 6 1/2, taker probably 6 ft 8
Canson said on 3/Feb/19
@RP you’re absolutely right about Columbo. Taker still has the chance to measure 6’6” but I say that because of his bad posture
@RP you’re absolutely right about Columbo. Taker still has the chance to measure 6’6” but I say that because of his bad posture
Sotiris Gravas said on 3/Feb/19
@Ozzy Check out at Dirk w/ 6'6.25" Carmelo Anthony... Click Here
Funny how Kanter doesn't seem a strong 6'9" w/ Dirk here... Click Here
As for Grizz... here he is w/ NBA-listed 6'11" Marcus Camby... Click Here
Problem is, here's Camby w/ around 6'11"/6'11.5" Tyson Chandler (NBA-listed as 7'1")
If Marcus Camby is maybe 6'9.5", Grizz is not 6'9".
Here's Grizz w/ 6'1.5" Mark Henry... Click Here , Click Here
Henry and Big Show... Click Here
Grizz and 6'4" Jeff Goldblum (2009)... Click Here
W/ 5'8.25" Steve Buscemi... Click Here Grizz looks VERY short here.
W/ 5'8" Tracy Morgan... Click Here
Why did he look so short next to Marcus Camby and Steve Buscemi? Either they were tiptoeing it as a joke, or Grizz forgot to wear his lifts...
Look how short he looks here w/ 6'5" Kevin Brown (your pic)... Click Here He looks 6'7".
Here, he's back to being 6'9"... Click Here. Maybe Brown was in lifts in the other pic...
Two more, just for fun... Grizz and now 6'2" Clyde Frazier (2013)... Click Here He doesn't look 6'9 here.
6'8" Alonzo Mourning and Frazier (2012)... Click Here
Actually, one more: 6'2" Frazier next to now 6'4" Dr. J for height confirmation (2019):
Click Here
So, my question to you, good sir, is... what do you think?
Either way, I see Shaq as 6'11.5" as well as 7 feet, regardless of Grizz. Guys that tall will fluctuate more, I think.
@Ozzy Check out at Dirk w/ 6'6.25" Carmelo Anthony... Click Here
Funny how Kanter doesn't seem a strong 6'9" w/ Dirk here... Click Here
As for Grizz... here he is w/ NBA-listed 6'11" Marcus Camby... Click Here
Problem is, here's Camby w/ around 6'11"/6'11.5" Tyson Chandler (NBA-listed as 7'1")
If Marcus Camby is maybe 6'9.5", Grizz is not 6'9".
Here's Grizz w/ 6'1.5" Mark Henry... Click Here , Click Here
Henry and Big Show... Click Here
Grizz and 6'4" Jeff Goldblum (2009)... Click Here
W/ 5'8.25" Steve Buscemi... Click Here Grizz looks VERY short here.
W/ 5'8" Tracy Morgan... Click Here
Why did he look so short next to Marcus Camby and Steve Buscemi? Either they were tiptoeing it as a joke, or Grizz forgot to wear his lifts...
Look how short he looks here w/ 6'5" Kevin Brown (your pic)... Click Here He looks 6'7".
Here, he's back to being 6'9"... Click Here. Maybe Brown was in lifts in the other pic...
Two more, just for fun... Grizz and now 6'2" Clyde Frazier (2013)... Click Here He doesn't look 6'9 here.
6'8" Alonzo Mourning and Frazier (2012)... Click Here
Actually, one more: 6'2" Frazier next to now 6'4" Dr. J for height confirmation (2019):
Click Here
So, my question to you, good sir, is... what do you think?
Either way, I see Shaq as 6'11.5" as well as 7 feet, regardless of Grizz. Guys that tall will fluctuate more, I think.
Dan Trojan said on 2/Feb/19
Sotiris i really don't get you you say you believe undertaker is 6'5" and tim sylvia is too meanwhile it's clear in that one video that undertaker is taller than sylvia not trying to start an argument just pointing it out
Sotiris i really don't get you you say you believe undertaker is 6'5" and tim sylvia is too meanwhile it's clear in that one video that undertaker is taller than sylvia not trying to start an argument just pointing it out
RP said on 2/Feb/19
Marc Colombo is a legit 6’8” barefoot morning height ...officially measured 6’7-7/8” & 313 lbs (morning) barefoot @ the NFL Combine. Making him most likely 6’7-1/2” afternoon barefoot height. That would give you a 2016 Undertaker, 6’6-3/8” to 6’6-1/2” morning barefoot height & likely 6’6” flat afternoon barefoot height. I honestly think 2018-2019 Present Day Undertaker would not measure close to 6’6” barefoot in the afternoon now. I’m guessing 6’5-1/2” mid afternoon measurement at best now. IMO morning 6’6” & afternoon 6’5-1/2” is the best he’s going to measure barefoot today. Also, keep in mind we can’t see Marc & Mark’s footwear in that pic from 2016.
Marc Colombo is a legit 6’8” barefoot morning height ...officially measured 6’7-7/8” & 313 lbs (morning) barefoot @ the NFL Combine. Making him most likely 6’7-1/2” afternoon barefoot height. That would give you a 2016 Undertaker, 6’6-3/8” to 6’6-1/2” morning barefoot height & likely 6’6” flat afternoon barefoot height. I honestly think 2018-2019 Present Day Undertaker would not measure close to 6’6” barefoot in the afternoon now. I’m guessing 6’5-1/2” mid afternoon measurement at best now. IMO morning 6’6” & afternoon 6’5-1/2” is the best he’s going to measure barefoot today. Also, keep in mind we can’t see Marc & Mark’s footwear in that pic from 2016.
edwards said on 2/Feb/19
@sotiris gravas i assume mahal is same as mcintire if not more.
@sotiris gravas i assume mahal is same as mcintire if not more.
Ozzy said on 1/Feb/19
@canson ... yes totally agree with your comment. I see strowman 6'6" Kanter 6'9". Adams looks tall but I think hes 7 in shoes.
Interesting here I have posted these pics below before on someones profile. But check these comparisons.
@Sotiris Gravas check these out mate. Whats your thoughts?
6'5" Kevin Brown w Grizz Chapman billed 7' .. prob 6'9" my guestimate
Click Here
But now check 7' Grizz and Shaq (7'1?)
Click Here
Someones shorter lol
@canson ... yes totally agree with your comment. I see strowman 6'6" Kanter 6'9". Adams looks tall but I think hes 7 in shoes.
Interesting here I have posted these pics below before on someones profile. But check these comparisons.
@Sotiris Gravas check these out mate. Whats your thoughts?
6'5" Kevin Brown w Grizz Chapman billed 7' .. prob 6'9" my guestimate
Click Here
But now check 7' Grizz and Shaq (7'1?)
Click Here
Someones shorter lol
Sotiris Gravas said on 1/Feb/19
@Canson and @edwards What do you guys give for Drew McIntyre, who Rob also has at 6'4.5"...?
@Ozzy Definitely at least 6'5" for Sylvia IMHO.
@NCL I remember Tatanka looking more 5'10" than 5'11" when I met him back in '97. It was many years ago and perhaps my memory is faltering due to age. Early-onset dementia, here I come!
Here's a nice group shot w/ Tatanka and Taker (1994)... Click Here
Here's where Tatanka drank from Alice in Wonderland's mysterious bottle and shrank:
Click Here
@Canson and @edwards What do you guys give for Drew McIntyre, who Rob also has at 6'4.5"...?
@Ozzy Definitely at least 6'5" for Sylvia IMHO.
@NCL I remember Tatanka looking more 5'10" than 5'11" when I met him back in '97. It was many years ago and perhaps my memory is faltering due to age. Early-onset dementia, here I come!
Here's a nice group shot w/ Tatanka and Taker (1994)... Click Here
Here's where Tatanka drank from Alice in Wonderland's mysterious bottle and shrank:
Click Here
rawdshaq said on 1/Feb/19
Also for Brock Lesnar I think he's 6'2 1/2" - 6'3" but he isn't short
Also for Brock Lesnar I think he's 6'2 1/2" - 6'3" but he isn't short
rawdshaq said on 1/Feb/19
@NCL That video proves that Undertaker was a legit 6'7 1/2" barefoot next to 6'9" peak Diesel.
Undertaker today 6'5" - 6'5 1/2" maybe even 6'5 3/4" but nothing 6'6" or over for sure
@NCL That video proves that Undertaker was a legit 6'7 1/2" barefoot next to 6'9" peak Diesel.
Undertaker today 6'5" - 6'5 1/2" maybe even 6'5 3/4" but nothing 6'6" or over for sure
edwards said on 1/Feb/19
@sotiris gravas jinder aint strong 6'4 at low.he maybe weak 6'4 imho
@sotiris gravas jinder aint strong 6'4 at low.he maybe weak 6'4 imho
Ozzy said on 31/Jan/19
@edwards Yeah agree. That pic with columbo was in 2016. Just after Wrestlemania 32 when Shane Mac gave him that black eye. Prob around 6.5.5, I think in wrestling gear he was be 6'7". Always thought he was. Maybe with his old original outfit with his hat on maybe 6'8 - 6'9"...... I think thats how wrestling would measure him then chuck an inch on for extra size billing.
Actually there was a magazine called Tombstone in 1994? Maybe 93'. Its a bio of the undertaker. They start off by saying he was 7 foot tall and 320 pounds. Even as a kid I thought he is not that big lol
@edwards Yeah agree. That pic with columbo was in 2016. Just after Wrestlemania 32 when Shane Mac gave him that black eye. Prob around 6.5.5, I think in wrestling gear he was be 6'7". Always thought he was. Maybe with his old original outfit with his hat on maybe 6'8 - 6'9"...... I think thats how wrestling would measure him then chuck an inch on for extra size billing.
Actually there was a magazine called Tombstone in 1994? Maybe 93'. Its a bio of the undertaker. They start off by saying he was 7 foot tall and 320 pounds. Even as a kid I thought he is not that big lol
Ozzy said on 31/Jan/19
@Sotiris Gravas yeah I didnt think Silvia was 6'8" .. always looked way shorter. What do you think hes prob 6'4.5 - maybe 6'5 the highest ?
@Sotiris Gravas yeah I didnt think Silvia was 6'8" .. always looked way shorter. What do you think hes prob 6'4.5 - maybe 6'5 the highest ?
NCL said on 31/Jan/19
Found a cool gem: Undertaker, Diesel, and HBK vs Sid, Kama, and Tatanka Click Here
Undertaker and Diesel are standing head to head at the beginning of the video. Both I think are at peak heights here.
You want to talk about elevator shoes, check out Kama's boots!
Found a cool gem: Undertaker, Diesel, and HBK vs Sid, Kama, and Tatanka Click Here
Undertaker and Diesel are standing head to head at the beginning of the video. Both I think are at peak heights here.
You want to talk about elevator shoes, check out Kama's boots!
Phenom89 said on 31/Jan/19
@Rob
You've meet Regal, if he was 6'3 (with shoes i guess) Undertaker here is 6'7.5 (with shoes..) or over it?
Click Here
Editor Rob
@Rob
You've meet Regal, if he was 6'3 (with shoes i guess) Undertaker here is 6'7.5 (with shoes..) or over it?
Click Here
Editor RobAt that moment he could pull off looking near 6ft 9
Phenom89 said on 31/Jan/19
Click Here
I dont now who is and how tall is this guy but If that basketball player is 5'9, he is 6'1 at least i think or an inch more.
What you think about?
Click Here
I dont now who is and how tall is this guy but If that basketball player is 5'9, he is 6'1 at least i think or an inch more.
What you think about?
Phenom89 said on 31/Jan/19
Click Here
2 on 3 of those pictures are with this basketball player, his height is listed at 5'9.
Click Here
2 on 3 of those pictures are with this basketball player, his height is listed at 5'9.
Canson said on 31/Jan/19
@Sotiris: Jinder doesn’t strike me as a legit 6’4 at a low. Weak 6’4 probably
@Sotiris: Jinder doesn’t strike me as a legit 6’4 at a low. Weak 6’4 probably
Phenom89 said on 31/Jan/19
Btw Michelle McCool is consuming him, good for him i guess
Btw Michelle McCool is consuming him, good for him i guess
edwards said on 31/Jan/19
the lowest possible that taker can be is 6'5.75,infact 6'5 flat or 6'5.5 is complete joke.before considering his height,one must think that the guy occasionally or rarely stands straight and has big forehead.
the lowest possible that taker can be is 6'5.75,infact 6'5 flat or 6'5.5 is complete joke.before considering his height,one must think that the guy occasionally or rarely stands straight and has big forehead.
Canson said on 30/Jan/19
@Ozzy: Shaq looks sub 7’ in that pic which I’ve suspected. Probably weak 7. Kanter best case is maybe strong 6’9 like 6’9.25. I doubt Adams is really 7’0” tall barefoot but in the pics Strowman comes out to 6’6-6’7
@Ozzy: Shaq looks sub 7’ in that pic which I’ve suspected. Probably weak 7. Kanter best case is maybe strong 6’9 like 6’9.25. I doubt Adams is really 7’0” tall barefoot but in the pics Strowman comes out to 6’6-6’7
Sotiris Gravas said on 30/Jan/19
@Ozzy Great pic of Taker w/ Columbo; never saw that before.
Here's Tim Sylvia (not 6'8", obviously) w/ Jinder Mahal (NOT 6'4.5")...Click Here
Sylvia w/ 100% 6'3" Andrei Arlovski... Click Here , Click Here
Sylvia and Brock Lesnar... Click Here
@Ozzy Great pic of Taker w/ Columbo; never saw that before.
Here's Tim Sylvia (not 6'8", obviously) w/ Jinder Mahal (NOT 6'4.5")...Click Here
Sylvia w/ 100% 6'3" Andrei Arlovski... Click Here , Click Here
Sylvia and Brock Lesnar... Click Here
Canson said on 30/Jan/19
@Rawdshaq: based on how he looks in the ring against other guys who are 6’6-6’7 I could all but rule out 6’5”. Maybe 6’5.5 but that’s as low as he could be. 6’5.75 is a better shout if he dips below 6’6” today. But yea he’s at least 6’7” in boots if not a bit higher 202ish
@Rawdshaq: based on how he looks in the ring against other guys who are 6’6-6’7 I could all but rule out 6’5”. Maybe 6’5.5 but that’s as low as he could be. 6’5.75 is a better shout if he dips below 6’6” today. But yea he’s at least 6’7” in boots if not a bit higher 202ish
Phenom89 said on 30/Jan/19
With Colombo he looks 6'6
With the ufc fighter i dont know, i think was in the early 2000s no?
He is probably almost 2" taller but i dont know if Silva is a real 6'8. I doubt
With Colombo he looks 6'6
With the ufc fighter i dont know, i think was in the early 2000s no?
He is probably almost 2" taller but i dont know if Silva is a real 6'8. I doubt
edwards said on 30/Jan/19
@ ozzy if marc columbo is really 6'8 then taker looks 1.5 inch shorter,that put taker in 6'6.5,since it was some years ago.even today.i wouldnt be surprised if he measures full 6'6.
@ ozzy if marc columbo is really 6'8 then taker looks 1.5 inch shorter,that put taker in 6'6.5,since it was some years ago.even today.i wouldnt be surprised if he measures full 6'6.
Ozzy said on 29/Jan/19
Couple photos
Kanter with 7' Stephen Adams
Click Here
Kanter (looking as same height next to) Shaq
Click Here
Kanter and Strowman back to back height compare
Click Here
Couple photos
Kanter with 7' Stephen Adams
Click Here
Kanter (looking as same height next to) Shaq
Click Here
Kanter and Strowman back to back height compare
Click Here
Canson said on 28/Jan/19
@Dan trojan: Braun likely does edge be and Baron corbin. Would you say 199? That’s where I guessed him before as he would edge Corbin by close to a CM. I have Corbin a straight 6’6 198.1cm
@Dan trojan: Braun likely does edge be and Baron corbin. Would you say 199? That’s where I guessed him before as he would edge Corbin by close to a CM. I have Corbin a straight 6’6 198.1cm
Dan Trojan said on 28/Jan/19
It's kinda weird to me the difference between taker and kanter looks about the same difference between taker and love not saying kanter and love are the same height just saying it proves that camera angles can change height perception
It's kinda weird to me the difference between taker and kanter looks about the same difference between taker and love not saying kanter and love are the same height just saying it proves that camera angles can change height perception
rawdshaq said on 28/Jan/19
Undertaker is easily over 6'6" with boots but what about barefoot? He probably measures 6'5.5" barefoot or 6'5" flat. At his peak he was over 6'7" barefoot easily though
Undertaker is easily over 6'6" with boots but what about barefoot? He probably measures 6'5.5" barefoot or 6'5" flat. At his peak he was over 6'7" barefoot easily though
Phenom89 said on 28/Jan/19
@dan trojan
You could have right but footwear and many others things, most of all with guys like him, are very important.
If he is 6'7, Undertaker is in the worst scenario 6'6 3/4 6'6.5.
Between him taker and corbin, is the last one that for me give the taller impression. 1-2 cm.
And undertaker forehead is same lavel than strowman if not a hair taller, what confuse us in their staredown was undertaker's eyes level
@dan trojan
You could have right but footwear and many others things, most of all with guys like him, are very important.
If he is 6'7, Undertaker is in the worst scenario 6'6 3/4 6'6.5.
Between him taker and corbin, is the last one that for me give the taller impression. 1-2 cm.
And undertaker forehead is same lavel than strowman if not a hair taller, what confuse us in their staredown was undertaker's eyes level
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 28/Jan/19
At takers lowest looks 7.5cm 3inches so enes 207cm taker 200.5cm.
At takers lowest looks 7.5cm 3inches so enes 207cm taker 200.5cm.
edwards said on 27/Jan/19
@phenom189 at times both taker and strowman seems to have an edge,taker and corbin seems to be equal while other times strowman would appear taller than corbin.you have to measure all of star (taker,strowman and corbin)to know their real height.i personally think these three superstar are equal and there is difference of only cm.
@phenom189 at times both taker and strowman seems to have an edge,taker and corbin seems to be equal while other times strowman would appear taller than corbin.you have to measure all of star (taker,strowman and corbin)to know their real height.i personally think these three superstar are equal and there is difference of only cm.
Phenom89 said on 27/Jan/19
Click Here
Click Here
The first pic is suspect because Taker, if Kanter is 6'9 or 6'9.5 like i read, seems very close ( not even 2"?)
But he is in wrestling gear.
He is not in wrestling gear in the second picture, and you can notice a bit of difference( not 5 cm, a bit more i guess).
Click Here
Click Here
The first pic is suspect because Taker, if Kanter is 6'9 or 6'9.5 like i read, seems very close ( not even 2"?)
But he is in wrestling gear.
He is not in wrestling gear in the second picture, and you can notice a bit of difference( not 5 cm, a bit more i guess).
Phenom89 said on 27/Jan/19
@Dewie
Hmm, only 5 cm?
@Dewie
Hmm, only 5 cm?
Dan Trojan said on 27/Jan/19
Phenom i can attest to how tall braun is i've seen him up close he is definitely in the 6'6"-7 range trust me
Phenom i can attest to how tall braun is i've seen him up close he is definitely in the 6'6"-7 range trust me
Canson said on 27/Jan/19
@Phenom89: he’s not that much taller than Ali in that picture. He also had a slight footwear advantage on Ali. Ali pegged him 6’6.5 as possible but looking at that pic he’s probably around 199cm all things considered. I also don’t know if Ali Baba still measured the full 6’6” at that stage. He mentioned 6’5 7/8 and also He said that in later years he had dropped to 6’5.5 or 6’5 5/8 at a low. Maybe 6’5.5 to 5/8 is an extreme low for him and the truth may be more around 6’5 3/4-7/8. Either way Taker probably had only half inch on him. As for Tyler Mane when ali met him 6’7” is arguable but even he could’ve been slightly less as Ali was almost the same with him although this time he had the footwear advantage on Mane. He did mention that he was at a low which was 6’6” at that time and that Mane was not up as long as he was so 6’6.75 possible for him and 6’6 1/4-1/2 for Taker back then. Today Taker doesn’t look quite as tall but probably no less than 197-198 range if not a full 198 still
@Phenom89: he’s not that much taller than Ali in that picture. He also had a slight footwear advantage on Ali. Ali pegged him 6’6.5 as possible but looking at that pic he’s probably around 199cm all things considered. I also don’t know if Ali Baba still measured the full 6’6” at that stage. He mentioned 6’5 7/8 and also He said that in later years he had dropped to 6’5.5 or 6’5 5/8 at a low. Maybe 6’5.5 to 5/8 is an extreme low for him and the truth may be more around 6’5 3/4-7/8. Either way Taker probably had only half inch on him. As for Tyler Mane when ali met him 6’7” is arguable but even he could’ve been slightly less as Ali was almost the same with him although this time he had the footwear advantage on Mane. He did mention that he was at a low which was 6’6” at that time and that Mane was not up as long as he was so 6’6.75 possible for him and 6’6 1/4-1/2 for Taker back then. Today Taker doesn’t look quite as tall but probably no less than 197-198 range if not a full 198 still
Canson said on 27/Jan/19
@Phenom89: 1.5 is exactly what I said before. Love could be 6’7-6’7.5 Which would still make Taker around 6’6 or weak 6’6 minimum
@Phenom89: 1.5 is exactly what I said before. Love could be 6’7-6’7.5 Which would still make Taker around 6’6 or weak 6’6 minimum
rawdshaq said on 26/Jan/19
Undertaker was easily over 6' 7" at peak, 6' 7 1/2" at peak. Tbh I'm reconsidering his current height, maybe still 6' 6" or 6' 6 1/2", like he is listed.
Undertaker was easily over 6' 7" at peak, 6' 7 1/2" at peak. Tbh I'm reconsidering his current height, maybe still 6' 6" or 6' 6 1/2", like he is listed.
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 26/Jan/19
Enes kanter meet undertaker said hes real height is 6ft7 enes 6ft9 2inches 5cm taller barefoot.
Enes kanter meet undertaker said hes real height is 6ft7 enes 6ft9 2inches 5cm taller barefoot.
Dan Trojan said on 26/Jan/19
Taker was definitely taller than sid that staredown from the 80's doesn't do justice seeing as sid was wearing a mask and had almost an afro also he was probably wearing lifts in wwe taker always looked a bit taller
Taker was definitely taller than sid that staredown from the 80's doesn't do justice seeing as sid was wearing a mask and had almost an afro also he was probably wearing lifts in wwe taker always looked a bit taller
Phenom89 said on 26/Jan/19
He was taller than Ali Baba. But in that picture, with shoes on, i dont know if he is a full 6'7 but i think more 6'6 3/4. If he is,how tall he would be with out shoes so?
It Is in this detail that i start to think at a 6'5 range, no more 6'6.
He was taller than Ali Baba. But in that picture, with shoes on, i dont know if he is a full 6'7 but i think more 6'6 3/4. If he is,how tall he would be with out shoes so?
It Is in this detail that i start to think at a 6'5 range, no more 6'6.
Phenom89 said on 26/Jan/19
@Edwards
Well ok i agree in part, but about the way he stacks up with corbin and strooman you have to count that they probably are not tall as you think.
And i say more, barefoot Undertaker is taller than Strooman. Strooman in my opinion is not full 6'6. I dont know about Corbin, but let say 6'6 for him.
@Canson
If both in equal posture , Love and Taker, maybe you would not see 2" but 1,5 at least. With Thompson, excluding posture, there are 2.5 -3".
But 6'7 peak barefoot for Taker instead of 6'6.5 is fine. Is on the 6'8-6'9 that i really struggle to accept.
Anyway i always think Love is a bit taller than 6'7
@Edwards
Well ok i agree in part, but about the way he stacks up with corbin and strooman you have to count that they probably are not tall as you think.
And i say more, barefoot Undertaker is taller than Strooman. Strooman in my opinion is not full 6'6. I dont know about Corbin, but let say 6'6 for him.
@Canson
If both in equal posture , Love and Taker, maybe you would not see 2" but 1,5 at least. With Thompson, excluding posture, there are 2.5 -3".
But 6'7 peak barefoot for Taker instead of 6'6.5 is fine. Is on the 6'8-6'9 that i really struggle to accept.
Anyway i always think Love is a bit taller than 6'7
Canson said on 26/Jan/19
@Vegas: with Reigns he still looks 6’6” minimum considering camera. And that’s considering Reigns is closer to 6’2-6’2.25 really looks a flat 6’2 most of the time being that 6’2 5/8 is early morning
@Vegas: with Reigns he still looks 6’6” minimum considering camera. And that’s considering Reigns is closer to 6’2-6’2.25 really looks a flat 6’2 most of the time being that 6’2 5/8 is early morning
Lyle said on 26/Jan/19
@Ashley123 proves Undertaker was 6'7 in that pic Sid was 6'6 maybe 6'6.5, and he's also famous for the old head tilt to make him look taller.
6'7 peak Taker
6'7. 5 maybe. 75 for Kane
@Ashley123 proves Undertaker was 6'7 in that pic Sid was 6'6 maybe 6'6.5, and he's also famous for the old head tilt to make him look taller.
6'7 peak Taker
6'7. 5 maybe. 75 for Kane
edwards said on 26/Jan/19
@canson i fully agree with you,we know that anything above 6'6 is high for him but i doubt he aint as low as others assumed him to be.i think he is 6'6 but a weak one.i personally think anthing thing less than 6'5.75 is hard to believe.my estimation is same as yours.
@canson i fully agree with you,we know that anything above 6'6 is high for him but i doubt he aint as low as others assumed him to be.i think he is 6'6 but a weak one.i personally think anthing thing less than 6'5.75 is hard to believe.my estimation is same as yours.
rawdshaq said on 25/Jan/19
@Vegas That's actually a really interesting picture, Undertaker looks 6' 7 1/2" there, btw his hat actually makes him look shorter because of how big his forehead is. That one picture might make me reconsider Undertakes current height.
@Vegas That's actually a really interesting picture, Undertaker looks 6' 7 1/2" there, btw his hat actually makes him look shorter because of how big his forehead is. That one picture might make me reconsider Undertakes current height.
Dan Trojan said on 25/Jan/19
And trust me i'm not saying that undertaker was actually 6'10" i believe he was 6'7" or a little over gonzalez had more than 8 inches on taker at times it looked like it but that was only when gonzalez was leaning and looking down he did that a lot being a really tall guy but when he stood up straight he clearly had a full head on him
And trust me i'm not saying that undertaker was actually 6'10" i believe he was 6'7" or a little over gonzalez had more than 8 inches on taker at times it looked like it but that was only when gonzalez was leaning and looking down he did that a lot being a really tall guy but when he stood up straight he clearly had a full head on him
Phenom89 said on 25/Jan/19
Ashley123
I think 6'6.5 6'6 3/4 is absolutely not bad, if you wear shoes you arrive easily at 6'8. I dont see him 6'8 barefoot, some time ago yeah.
A 6'8 Nash easily can arrive to 6'9.5 with shoes.
Almost 6'10 peak Big show can easily be 6'11.5(7 feet)...with a good pair of shoes.
I can continue, but its clear what i think. More of the heights listed as barefoot for me are heights in shoes.
Ashley123
I think 6'6.5 6'6 3/4 is absolutely not bad, if you wear shoes you arrive easily at 6'8. I dont see him 6'8 barefoot, some time ago yeah.
A 6'8 Nash easily can arrive to 6'9.5 with shoes.
Almost 6'10 peak Big show can easily be 6'11.5(7 feet)...with a good pair of shoes.
I can continue, but its clear what i think. More of the heights listed as barefoot for me are heights in shoes.
Dan Trojan said on 25/Jan/19
Ced you're wrong giant gonzalez was measured at a legitimate 7'6"
Ced you're wrong giant gonzalez was measured at a legitimate 7'6"
edwards said on 25/Jan/19
@phenom89 dude,taker is clearly slouching in the photos and also taker has huge forehead which should be taken into account.there is not a 2 inch difference between taker and love.the max difference is 1.5 inch.rounded up means we here in the states round our height to nearest inch.i mean if i were 6'1.5,i would roundup to 6'2 or its nearest.in morning he would easily wakeup at 6'7 or atleast close to it.there aint 2 inch difference between taker and love.6'5.5 maybe his night height.just a simple question,if he was only 6'5 then how would he stackup against corbin and strowman or atleast appear same as corbin and strowman???personally i dont go that low considering his bad posture and has big forehead and stand straight occasionly.
@phenom89 dude,taker is clearly slouching in the photos and also taker has huge forehead which should be taken into account.there is not a 2 inch difference between taker and love.the max difference is 1.5 inch.rounded up means we here in the states round our height to nearest inch.i mean if i were 6'1.5,i would roundup to 6'2 or its nearest.in morning he would easily wakeup at 6'7 or atleast close to it.there aint 2 inch difference between taker and love.6'5.5 maybe his night height.just a simple question,if he was only 6'5 then how would he stackup against corbin and strowman or atleast appear same as corbin and strowman???personally i dont go that low considering his bad posture and has big forehead and stand straight occasionly.
Canson said on 25/Jan/19
@Lyle and Edwards: I believe Vegas has also met him and he also said he was noticeably taller than legit barefoot 6’5” wrestlers. As far as 6’5.75 being his low I tend to agree but I don’t rule out 6’5.5 but do rule out anything lower than that and I also don’t rule out the full 6’6 but anything higher today seems out of reach for an afternoon low. He has definitely lost height today as I believe at his peak that he was easily 6’7”
@Lyle and Edwards: I believe Vegas has also met him and he also said he was noticeably taller than legit barefoot 6’5” wrestlers. As far as 6’5.75 being his low I tend to agree but I don’t rule out 6’5.5 but do rule out anything lower than that and I also don’t rule out the full 6’6 but anything higher today seems out of reach for an afternoon low. He has definitely lost height today as I believe at his peak that he was easily 6’7”
Canson said on 25/Jan/19
@Phenom89: rounded up means he could place into the 6’5.5 range or above perhaps and would be rounded up to 6’6” on a physical. It wouldn’t surprise me if Taker does not know his actual height today. Or maybe he does. A lot of guys who lose height don’t know they have as they may not have been measured recently or may not want to admit that they’ve lost height. As for my opinion on him, I highly doubt he’s as low as 6’5”. Kevin Love was an 08 draftee and that class measured in the afternoon. However, that doesn’t mean that he did not lay down prior to his measurement. He’s said to be closer to 6’7” and doesn’t really look much different than Lebron. I don’t rule out 6’7.5 but 6’7.75 at a low seems too high. I think people here don’t take into account the poor posture that Taker has and that pic with Love likely is representative of that same theme. I doubt Love is really 2” taller than him
@Phenom89: rounded up means he could place into the 6’5.5 range or above perhaps and would be rounded up to 6’6” on a physical. It wouldn’t surprise me if Taker does not know his actual height today. Or maybe he does. A lot of guys who lose height don’t know they have as they may not have been measured recently or may not want to admit that they’ve lost height. As for my opinion on him, I highly doubt he’s as low as 6’5”. Kevin Love was an 08 draftee and that class measured in the afternoon. However, that doesn’t mean that he did not lay down prior to his measurement. He’s said to be closer to 6’7” and doesn’t really look much different than Lebron. I don’t rule out 6’7.5 but 6’7.75 at a low seems too high. I think people here don’t take into account the poor posture that Taker has and that pic with Love likely is representative of that same theme. I doubt Love is really 2” taller than him
Justin Medina said on 24/Jan/19
Wow i had always thought this dude was at least 7 feet tall, had no clue he was barely 6'61/2".
Wow i had always thought this dude was at least 7 feet tall, had no clue he was barely 6'61/2".
Ashley123 said on 24/Jan/19
Funny thing is Taker is Proven still to be 6'6, he looked taller than legit 6'6 AliBaba,
and you still post pics with Taker with bad angles or his poor posture.
Taker and Lesnar
Click Here
Taker and Sid(who at his peak could be 6'6.75 or 200 cm, real staredown Sid Without Mask with fake hair like USWA staredown)
Click Here
Taker got really poor posture in that Staredown with Reigns.
Funny thing is Taker is Proven still to be 6'6, he looked taller than legit 6'6 AliBaba,
and you still post pics with Taker with bad angles or his poor posture.
Taker and Lesnar
Click Here
Taker and Sid(who at his peak could be 6'6.75 or 200 cm, real staredown Sid Without Mask with fake hair like USWA staredown)
Click Here
Taker got really poor posture in that Staredown with Reigns.
tree said on 24/Jan/19
SORTIS in the Lesnar taker pic there is an angle tilt in Lesnars favour look at the ROPES
Lesnar is not ower Takers eyebrows!
SORTIS in the Lesnar taker pic there is an angle tilt in Lesnars favour look at the ROPES
Lesnar is not ower Takers eyebrows!
Ashley123 said on 24/Jan/19
Phenom89
No Way Taker peak was 6'6.5, he is still 6'6 or even 6'6.25, and he easily lost 1.5 inches of his height, he's noticeable shorter that he used to be years before. On Good Day he was almost 6'8, like 6'7.75, and on a bad day i'd say 6'7.25. So 6'7.5 is safe bet.
Phenom89
No Way Taker peak was 6'6.5, he is still 6'6 or even 6'6.25, and he easily lost 1.5 inches of his height, he's noticeable shorter that he used to be years before. On Good Day he was almost 6'8, like 6'7.75, and on a bad day i'd say 6'7.25. So 6'7.5 is safe bet.
tree said on 24/Jan/19
Peak was over 6ft6 u can bet ur life on it Click Here
Click Here
And Batista was not under 190cm for sure Click Here
Rob how tall u say taker looked with batista there?
Peak was over 6ft6 u can bet ur life on it Click Here
Click Here
And Batista was not under 190cm for sure Click Here
Rob how tall u say taker looked with batista there?
Vegas' said on 24/Jan/19
Its interesting how just a little camera angle advantage can make you look taller. Reigns is a measured 6'2.5 barefoot at NFL combine and that's 2017 Click Here
Its interesting how just a little camera angle advantage can make you look taller. Reigns is a measured 6'2.5 barefoot at NFL combine and that's 2017 Click Here
Canson said on 24/Jan/19
He looked taller than 6’6.5 at his peak. I would’ve guessed him 6’7” or more. He still looked 6’6 and change next to Ali Baba. I’d say he’s probably 6’6” today or a hair under
He looked taller than 6’6.5 at his peak. I would’ve guessed him 6’7” or more. He still looked 6’6 and change next to Ali Baba. I’d say he’s probably 6’6” today or a hair under
Phenom89 said on 24/Jan/19
@edwards
@Canson
I dont understand "rounded up" to 6'6.
Sure he is not 6'5.5 or less in the morning. But From afternoon and most of all in the evening he is even less than 6'5.5 i guess.
I often read " Kevin Love is not 6'7.75 , that s morning height. He is 6'7"...
So( if we are not talking about morning heights)we should remember that if we put Taker at 6'6.25 avarage height than Love MUST be 6'8-6'8.5 barefoot at a low and Thompson 6'9 /6'9.5
@vegas
I didnt see yet the cena-Baba picture, important picture...we can exclude Ali Baba is same height as Khalifa if someone was in doubt :)
@edwards
@Canson
I dont understand "rounded up" to 6'6.
Sure he is not 6'5.5 or less in the morning. But From afternoon and most of all in the evening he is even less than 6'5.5 i guess.
I often read " Kevin Love is not 6'7.75 , that s morning height. He is 6'7"...
So( if we are not talking about morning heights)we should remember that if we put Taker at 6'6.25 avarage height than Love MUST be 6'8-6'8.5 barefoot at a low and Thompson 6'9 /6'9.5
@vegas
I didnt see yet the cena-Baba picture, important picture...we can exclude Ali Baba is same height as Khalifa if someone was in doubt :)
edwards said on 23/Jan/19
@canson i think 6"5.75 is also low for him.i cant even imagine taker being low as 6'5.weak 6'6 maybe arguable but below that may make no nose.the max lowest i see is as same as you told 6"5.75.
@canson i think 6"5.75 is also low for him.i cant even imagine taker being low as 6'5.weak 6'6 maybe arguable but below that may make no nose.the max lowest i see is as same as you told 6"5.75.
edwards said on 23/Jan/19
@lyle go few pages back
@lyle go few pages back
edwards said on 23/Jan/19
ashley123 when some legit photos of taker looking tall are posted ,those photos are completely ignored and photos where taker is looking short and is slouching are posted.there is no way in hell taker is less like 6'5.i mean thats almost hard to believe ,maybe sometimes gives such impression due to horrible posture he has.
ashley123 when some legit photos of taker looking tall are posted ,those photos are completely ignored and photos where taker is looking short and is slouching are posted.there is no way in hell taker is less like 6'5.i mean thats almost hard to believe ,maybe sometimes gives such impression due to horrible posture he has.
Sotiris Gravas said on 23/Jan/19
Guys, I never insinuated that Taker was 6'2". Anything to that effect is inference on your part. I see Taker as now being 6'5", max.
Here's the Khalifa/Lesnar pic I screwed up last time... Click Here
Here's Taker and Lesnar... Click Here , Click Here
Khalifa w/ 6'4" Michael Strahan... Click Here
Strahan and Cena... Click Here
Taker and Kurt Angle... Click Here
6'5" Howard Stern (POOR posture) and Angle... Click Here
Taker and 6'2" max Roman Reigns (2017)... Click Here
Reigns and 6'3" Titus... Click Here , Click Here
Titus and 6'5" Wade Barrett... Click Here
Look at how tall 6'3" Titus looks next to Reigns... then look at how tall 6'5" Barrett looks next to Titus... then go back and look at Taker next to Reigns... Is Taker over 6'5" now...? No, he isn't.
Also, newsflash: 6'6.5" peak height Sid Eudy was slightly taller than Taker, which means Taker was never 6'7.5" peak height. Ppl think I'm downgrading Taker but they delight in inflating his height, LOL. Seriously...
Guys, I never insinuated that Taker was 6'2". Anything to that effect is inference on your part. I see Taker as now being 6'5", max.
Here's the Khalifa/Lesnar pic I screwed up last time... Click Here
Here's Taker and Lesnar... Click Here , Click Here
Khalifa w/ 6'4" Michael Strahan... Click Here
Strahan and Cena... Click Here
Taker and Kurt Angle... Click Here
6'5" Howard Stern (POOR posture) and Angle... Click Here
Taker and 6'2" max Roman Reigns (2017)... Click Here
Reigns and 6'3" Titus... Click Here , Click Here
Titus and 6'5" Wade Barrett... Click Here
Look at how tall 6'3" Titus looks next to Reigns... then look at how tall 6'5" Barrett looks next to Titus... then go back and look at Taker next to Reigns... Is Taker over 6'5" now...? No, he isn't.
Also, newsflash: 6'6.5" peak height Sid Eudy was slightly taller than Taker, which means Taker was never 6'7.5" peak height. Ppl think I'm downgrading Taker but they delight in inflating his height, LOL. Seriously...
ced said on 23/Jan/19
Taker at his peak was 6’7 on the dot. Nothing more nothing less. Take a look at WM9, Giant Gonzales (who was 7’3.75) in reality (billed as 7’6 or 8 foot at times), had Taker by about 8 inches nothing more or less.
Big Show in 1999 when ge cane to the WWF was 6’11. Had Taker by 3.5 - 4 inches and had Kane by 2.5 inches (because Kane wore lifts).. Kane was 6’7.25 then, with 1.75 inch boots making him 6’9.
Taker at his peak was 6’7 on the dot. Nothing more nothing less. Take a look at WM9, Giant Gonzales (who was 7’3.75) in reality (billed as 7’6 or 8 foot at times), had Taker by about 8 inches nothing more or less.
Big Show in 1999 when ge cane to the WWF was 6’11. Had Taker by 3.5 - 4 inches and had Kane by 2.5 inches (because Kane wore lifts).. Kane was 6’7.25 then, with 1.75 inch boots making him 6’9.
Canson said on 23/Jan/19
@Lyle: it’s a couple pages back. Search 2014 and earlier. But it’s on Taker’s here
@Lyle: it’s a couple pages back. Search 2014 and earlier. But it’s on Taker’s here
miller said on 23/Jan/19
Rawshaq nobody has a 6 inch head that is stupid. takers head is at most 10 1/2 inches and khalifas head is minumum 9 inches.
Rawshaq nobody has a 6 inch head that is stupid. takers head is at most 10 1/2 inches and khalifas head is minumum 9 inches.
Phenom89 said on 23/Jan/19
Peak Undertaker : 6'6.5 max, 6'7.5 6'8 in shoes
Current : 6'5.5 and 6'6.5 6'7 in shoes. Since this September he is 6ft 6 3/4 in shoes.
I bet this.
Peak Undertaker : 6'6.5 max, 6'7.5 6'8 in shoes
Current : 6'5.5 and 6'6.5 6'7 in shoes. Since this September he is 6ft 6 3/4 in shoes.
I bet this.
Phenom89 said on 23/Jan/19
Peak Undertaker : 6'6.5 max, 6'7.5 6'8 in shoes
Current : 6'5.5 and 6'6.5 6'7 in shoes. Since this September he is 6ft 6 3/4 in shoes.
I bet this.
Peak Undertaker : 6'6.5 max, 6'7.5 6'8 in shoes
Current : 6'5.5 and 6'6.5 6'7 in shoes. Since this September he is 6ft 6 3/4 in shoes.
I bet this.
Phenom89 said on 23/Jan/19
The pucture with Cena posted by Sotiris, and Khalifa's picture should bring us to think taker is 6'3 at best...
We all know, sotiris first, that most of all in that period he was no shorter than 6'6.
More likely Cena, in his debut, probably was pushed with some kind of shoes for make him bigger.
Picture with Fallon is not believable because 5 minutes after that moment Taker looked no shorter than 6'5 range after the tombstone on the chicken.
Undertaker was same height as Khalifa, but when he was 13-14 years maybe:)
Everything 1,97 for him is too low. Everything over 2M is fantasy.
The pucture with Cena posted by Sotiris, and Khalifa's picture should bring us to think taker is 6'3 at best...
We all know, sotiris first, that most of all in that period he was no shorter than 6'6.
More likely Cena, in his debut, probably was pushed with some kind of shoes for make him bigger.
Picture with Fallon is not believable because 5 minutes after that moment Taker looked no shorter than 6'5 range after the tombstone on the chicken.
Undertaker was same height as Khalifa, but when he was 13-14 years maybe:)
Everything 1,97 for him is too low. Everything over 2M is fantasy.
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 23/Jan/19
Cena 6ft1 vs 6ft7 undertaker 6inches taller.
Cena 6ft1 vs 6ft7 undertaker 6inches taller.
rawdshaq said on 23/Jan/19
@Lyle He has a small head
@Lyle He has a small head
Vegas' said on 23/Jan/19
@Lyle, Baba and Taker Click Here
Baba and Cena seeing as Cena is being brought up Click Here
@Lyle, Baba and Taker Click Here
Baba and Cena seeing as Cena is being brought up Click Here
rawdshaq said on 23/Jan/19
Cena hasn't lost any height. He has always been 6 feet tall or maybe a tiny bit over. I agree however, 6 - 7 inch difference. Undertaker peak is 6' 7 1/2" - 6' 8"
Cena hasn't lost any height. He has always been 6 feet tall or maybe a tiny bit over. I agree however, 6 - 7 inch difference. Undertaker peak is 6' 7 1/2" - 6' 8"
rawdshaq said on 22/Jan/19
@Sotiris Are you implying that Undertaker is 6' 2"? Dude, Takers head is WAAAAY longer than Wiz Khalifas, Wiz 6 - 7 inch head, Taker 10 1/2" head, making Undertaker 6' 5 1/2".
Think about this for a second. If Undertaker was TRULY 6' 2" or 6' 3", they would NOT bill him at 6' 10". He was 6' 7 1/2 - 6' 8" peak and 6' 5" - 6' 5 1/2" now.
@Sotiris Are you implying that Undertaker is 6' 2"? Dude, Takers head is WAAAAY longer than Wiz Khalifas, Wiz 6 - 7 inch head, Taker 10 1/2" head, making Undertaker 6' 5 1/2".
Think about this for a second. If Undertaker was TRULY 6' 2" or 6' 3", they would NOT bill him at 6' 10". He was 6' 7 1/2 - 6' 8" peak and 6' 5" - 6' 5 1/2" now.
edwards said on 22/Jan/19
@sotiris gravas man,we cant see footwear between cena and khalifa.bty i can still see 6 inch difference between peak taker and peak cena,there are matches where you can see 6 inch difference,look at their face off at raw 2006 or even staredown at raw 2007 .and i can still see 5 inch difference if not more in recent wrestlemania 35 between cena and taker.dude,those photos are inaccurate and we cant see foot wear.cena who i believe is over 6 and maybe almost 6'1 was clearly 5 inch shorter than taker at wrestlemania 35 which put taker still at 6'6 maybe not a strong 6'6 but a weak one.at peak there was easily 6 inch difference.and bty those photos between cena and khalifa,we can see footwear.
@sotiris gravas man,we cant see footwear between cena and khalifa.bty i can still see 6 inch difference between peak taker and peak cena,there are matches where you can see 6 inch difference,look at their face off at raw 2006 or even staredown at raw 2007 .and i can still see 5 inch difference if not more in recent wrestlemania 35 between cena and taker.dude,those photos are inaccurate and we cant see foot wear.cena who i believe is over 6 and maybe almost 6'1 was clearly 5 inch shorter than taker at wrestlemania 35 which put taker still at 6'6 maybe not a strong 6'6 but a weak one.at peak there was easily 6 inch difference.and bty those photos between cena and khalifa,we can see footwear.
Canson said on 22/Jan/19
@Ashley123: while I disagree that Taker is as low as 6’5” flat, Sotiris is no different than some of the other posters who inflate celebs in the other direction. His reasoning is no different than some of the posters who make excuses about someone like Melo being 200cm (198-199 in real life) or Kobe being over 6’5” etc or a guy like Russell Westbrook being 6’3” or Derrick Rose being 6’2.5 I personally believe that if he isn’t 6’6” he is at least a strong 197cm ranger that has extremely poor posture which translates to 6’5.75 perhaps worse case.
@Ashley123: while I disagree that Taker is as low as 6’5” flat, Sotiris is no different than some of the other posters who inflate celebs in the other direction. His reasoning is no different than some of the posters who make excuses about someone like Melo being 200cm (198-199 in real life) or Kobe being over 6’5” etc or a guy like Russell Westbrook being 6’3” or Derrick Rose being 6’2.5 I personally believe that if he isn’t 6’6” he is at least a strong 197cm ranger that has extremely poor posture which translates to 6’5.75 perhaps worse case.
Ozzy said on 22/Jan/19
Phenom89, absolutely agree with your comment. I can see 6'8 maybe 6'9 in shoes, wrestling gear. Maybe thats what he refered to in his bio documentry video when he said he was a young kid, quote "( ..."6'8 to 6'9")".... I dont think wrestling uses barefoot height
Phenom89, absolutely agree with your comment. I can see 6'8 maybe 6'9 in shoes, wrestling gear. Maybe thats what he refered to in his bio documentry video when he said he was a young kid, quote "( ..."6'8 to 6'9")".... I dont think wrestling uses barefoot height
Ashley123 said on 22/Jan/19
Sotiris Gravas, Nice pic of Taker with Cena, but this is all about camera angles.
Click Here, this was real difference Between Taker and Cena.
What about that.
Sotiris Gravas, Nice pic of Taker with Cena, but this is all about camera angles.
Click Here, this was real difference Between Taker and Cena.
What about that.
Lyle said on 22/Jan/19
Can someone post the Undertaker pic with Ali Baba? I've heard so much about it but never seen it
Can someone post the Undertaker pic with Ali Baba? I've heard so much about it but never seen it
Dan Trojan said on 22/Jan/19
Sotiris are you actually implying that the undertaker is only 6'2" lmfao because if you are i have to say that is absolutely absurd i said before i accept your opinion but 6'2" come on
Sotiris are you actually implying that the undertaker is only 6'2" lmfao because if you are i have to say that is absolutely absurd i said before i accept your opinion but 6'2" come on
Ashley123 said on 22/Jan/19
Yes he was easily over 2M peak barefoot, on a good day he was almost 6'8,a and now 6'6.25 max, he for sure lost like 1.5 inches of his height, for years he got problems with his knees, back, he got both hips fully replaced, so he lost good 3.5 cm of his height, no question.
Yes he was easily over 2M peak barefoot, on a good day he was almost 6'8,a and now 6'6.25 max, he for sure lost like 1.5 inches of his height, for years he got problems with his knees, back, he got both hips fully replaced, so he lost good 3.5 cm of his height, no question.
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 22/Jan/19
Peak 6ft6.75 2.00m today 6ft5.5 1.97m barefoot.
Peak 6ft6.75 2.00m today 6ft5.5 1.97m barefoot.
Phenom89 said on 22/Jan/19
Click Here
If somehow this picture is real we should have some good indications no?
Click Here
If somehow this picture is real we should have some good indications no?
Lyle said on 22/Jan/19
@Rawdshaq you've got to be kidding? 6-7 Inch head haha, that's smaller than the average male hand
@Rawdshaq you've got to be kidding? 6-7 Inch head haha, that's smaller than the average male hand
Sotiris Gravas said on 21/Jan/19
@edwards Here's Khalifa and Cena... Click Here
Taker and Cena... Click Here
Rob has Khalifa at 6'2.75", but I hear Khalifa himself tells ppl he's only 6'2".
Here's Khalifa and Brock Lesnar... Click Here Rob has Lesnar as 6'2"... Guess what...? Lesnar is UNDER 6'2", LOL.
@edwards Here's Khalifa and Cena... Click Here
Taker and Cena... Click Here
Rob has Khalifa at 6'2.75", but I hear Khalifa himself tells ppl he's only 6'2".
Here's Khalifa and Brock Lesnar... Click Here Rob has Lesnar as 6'2"... Guess what...? Lesnar is UNDER 6'2", LOL.
Phenom89 said on 21/Jan/19
Btw just for curiosity there is a video of one of the brawls between the b.o.d. and d-x. After a tombstone on Hhh, in the end, you can see the undertaker's shoes. Normal shoes i would say, sure not big.
But definitely in the picture with Love, and i think in general in that period, he had different and bigger shoes.
Maybe also for this reason he looks shorter in the last months, at list for me.
Click Here
Btw just for curiosity there is a video of one of the brawls between the b.o.d. and d-x. After a tombstone on Hhh, in the end, you can see the undertaker's shoes. Normal shoes i would say, sure not big.
But definitely in the picture with Love, and i think in general in that period, he had different and bigger shoes.
Maybe also for this reason he looks shorter in the last months, at list for me.
Click Here
Vegas' said on 21/Jan/19
Re Khali, Greg Clausen was listed 7 foot in bodybuilding and 6'11 in NBA Click Here
Re Khali, Greg Clausen was listed 7 foot in bodybuilding and 6'11 in NBA Click Here
Phenom89 said on 21/Jan/19
Mark Calaway is a great performer, and really a great "actor". Only him could be the undertaker. His size is important for his character, but not important as his charisma is. ( because not only The Rock is charismatic).
I think, only after i knew this page, that he never was over 2M peak barefoot.
With shoes on 2,03 cm..2,05 at times probably is a possibility. But if i have to see him 6'8 barefoot and 6'10 in shoes no...i wouldn't .
About now its very hard, but of course i would not be surprise if he still 6'6.
I can make my guess, 6'5 range, but i dont forget Ali Baba picture...still the best one
Mark Calaway is a great performer, and really a great "actor". Only him could be the undertaker. His size is important for his character, but not important as his charisma is. ( because not only The Rock is charismatic).
I think, only after i knew this page, that he never was over 2M peak barefoot.
With shoes on 2,03 cm..2,05 at times probably is a possibility. But if i have to see him 6'8 barefoot and 6'10 in shoes no...i wouldn't .
About now its very hard, but of course i would not be surprise if he still 6'6.
I can make my guess, 6'5 range, but i dont forget Ali Baba picture...still the best one
Ashley123 said on 20/Jan/19
Sotiris Gravas, Stop please..., It was proven that Taker is still 6'6, and pictures you posted here, some angles were horrible, like Taker picture with Fallon.
Fallon(closer to the camera) and Taker(probably not standing very well)
Click Here.
Wiz Khalifa and Fallon(standing better than in your picture, head fully stretched)
Click Here
Sotiris Gravas, Stop please..., It was proven that Taker is still 6'6, and pictures you posted here, some angles were horrible, like Taker picture with Fallon.
Fallon(closer to the camera) and Taker(probably not standing very well)
Click Here.
Wiz Khalifa and Fallon(standing better than in your picture, head fully stretched)
Click Here
rawdshaq said on 20/Jan/19
@sotiris Lmao I agree. 14 inches is a joke. 18" inches is a good bet.
Also in those pictures, keep in mind that the Undertaker has a GIANT head. Like 10 - 11 inches, normal people like Wiz have 6 - 7 inch heads. That still puts Undertaker in 6' 5" - 6' 6" region. In some photos he really can look even lower than 6' 5" but in some other ones when he has good posture in public with fans he can look as high as 6' 7" still but I safe bet for him is going to be 6' 5 1/2".
@sotiris Lmao I agree. 14 inches is a joke. 18" inches is a good bet.
Also in those pictures, keep in mind that the Undertaker has a GIANT head. Like 10 - 11 inches, normal people like Wiz have 6 - 7 inch heads. That still puts Undertaker in 6' 5" - 6' 6" region. In some photos he really can look even lower than 6' 5" but in some other ones when he has good posture in public with fans he can look as high as 6' 7" still but I safe bet for him is going to be 6' 5 1/2".
Canson said on 20/Jan/19
@Phenom89: I actually think in his prime that he was a guy who woke up to 6’8” or a hair over and was maybe 6’7.25 at a low barefoot but no higher. Today 6’6” still tho
@Phenom89: I actually think in his prime that he was a guy who woke up to 6’8” or a hair over and was maybe 6’7.25 at a low barefoot but no higher. Today 6’6” still tho
edwards said on 19/Jan/19
@phenom189 i personally think there is no way taker is less than 6'6.yes he is not a strong 6'6 i believe,he maybe weak 6'6.even if he is only 6'5.5,he would have rounded to 6'6
@phenom189 i personally think there is no way taker is less than 6'6.yes he is not a strong 6'6 i believe,he maybe weak 6'6.even if he is only 6'5.5,he would have rounded to 6'6
edwards said on 19/Jan/19
@sotiris gravas khalifa is closer to camera than fallon whereas taker is behind fallon,if both stood side by side,then we would see the real difference.
@sotiris gravas khalifa is closer to camera than fallon whereas taker is behind fallon,if both stood side by side,then we would see the real difference.
Ashley123 said on 19/Jan/19
Sotris Gravas never showed a pic with Rodman Taller Than Taker, he posted a pic with Taker standing closer to camera, it's really hard to tell who was taller. Please stop downgrading Taker, he's still 6'6 or little bit over 6'6, and he was 6.7+ barefoot at his Peak, he's noticeable shorter now than he used to be before, no way he wasn't at least 6'7 at his peak.
Sotris Gravas never showed a pic with Rodman Taller Than Taker, he posted a pic with Taker standing closer to camera, it's really hard to tell who was taller. Please stop downgrading Taker, he's still 6'6 or little bit over 6'6, and he was 6.7+ barefoot at his Peak, he's noticeable shorter now than he used to be before, no way he wasn't at least 6'7 at his peak.
Vegas' said on 19/Jan/19
Phenom89, as I mentioned before photos aren't always the best unless they are full length and even then it's not 100%. Here kane looks close in height to Show Click Here
In reality Show had lots of height on him out of gear on video Click Here
Meltzer said Khali measured 7'0.5 barefoot during training camp in California in 90s. He was spot on about Wilt Chamberlain's measurement (even though for years folks on Andres page debated it). Looking at Khali with Giant Silva who was listed 216cm at 88 Olympics not sure you could debate below 7 foot for peak Khali if Silva was over 7 foot himself
Phenom89, as I mentioned before photos aren't always the best unless they are full length and even then it's not 100%. Here kane looks close in height to Show Click Here
In reality Show had lots of height on him out of gear on video Click Here
Meltzer said Khali measured 7'0.5 barefoot during training camp in California in 90s. He was spot on about Wilt Chamberlain's measurement (even though for years folks on Andres page debated it). Looking at Khali with Giant Silva who was listed 216cm at 88 Olympics not sure you could debate below 7 foot for peak Khali if Silva was over 7 foot himself
rawdshaq said on 18/Jan/19
I am pretty sure Triple H is bigger than me. I am 239 pounds, 5' 10"ish, and Triple H looks like an overall bigger person than me.
Understand this. Triple H was probably much heavier back in the day, lost weight, and put it as his billed weight because he's proud of it and wants everybody to know that he is 255 pounds. Also that's a very exact number, too. If it truly was inflated then it would be 265 or 280.
I am pretty sure Triple H is bigger than me. I am 239 pounds, 5' 10"ish, and Triple H looks like an overall bigger person than me.
Understand this. Triple H was probably much heavier back in the day, lost weight, and put it as his billed weight because he's proud of it and wants everybody to know that he is 255 pounds. Also that's a very exact number, too. If it truly was inflated then it would be 265 or 280.
edwards said on 18/Jan/19
@dan trojan same here dude,i also think taker and rodman are equal.
@dan trojan same here dude,i also think taker and rodman are equal.
Phenom89 said on 18/Jan/19
Dan Trojan
I doubt they are the same height, but Sotiris Gravas showed a pic where Rodman seems to be over an inch taller and i dont think that is the real gap.
In less words i think taker is under 6'6, but no way he is 6'4 range... to be clear
Dan Trojan
I doubt they are the same height, but Sotiris Gravas showed a pic where Rodman seems to be over an inch taller and i dont think that is the real gap.
In less words i think taker is under 6'6, but no way he is 6'4 range... to be clear
Ozzy said on 18/Jan/19
Sorry, other post didnt work too well. Just posting link again. Hope it works. Kevin Love & Yao Ming
mobile.twitter.com/yahoosportsnba/status/1028029205911490560
Sorry, other post didnt work too well. Just posting link again. Hope it works. Kevin Love & Yao Ming
mobile.twitter.com/yahoosportsnba/status/1028029205911490560
Phenom89 said on 18/Jan/19
@Canson: well ok,but sometimes i think we talk about height lost more for give a reason to a downgrade that, for us seems absurd, that for a real height lost problem.
I mean that sometimes i really think Taker was genuinely a 6'6 guy. Even in his 20s. And with boots on 6'7.5. But no barefoot , with shoes on.
@Canson: well ok,but sometimes i think we talk about height lost more for give a reason to a downgrade that, for us seems absurd, that for a real height lost problem.
I mean that sometimes i really think Taker was genuinely a 6'6 guy. Even in his 20s. And with boots on 6'7.5. But no barefoot , with shoes on.
Phenom89 said on 18/Jan/19
@Vegas: I trust you, because i didnt see him in person and you did it. But on Show's page i saw a picture with LeBron , who i think is 6'7. Well go to give a look at that picture, than you will understand my 6'9 range guess.
Khali i seriously doubt is 7'feet tall barefoot.
But since im on this site i understood that guess some heights is very hard. Undertker's height above all.
@Vegas: I trust you, because i didnt see him in person and you did it. But on Show's page i saw a picture with LeBron , who i think is 6'7. Well go to give a look at that picture, than you will understand my 6'9 range guess.
Khali i seriously doubt is 7'feet tall barefoot.
But since im on this site i understood that guess some heights is very hard. Undertker's height above all.
Ashley123 said on 18/Jan/19
No way that Rodman is taller than Taker, Taker forehead is way bigger and longer than Rodmans,
Id say both are little bit over 6'6 right now.
No way that Rodman is taller than Taker, Taker forehead is way bigger and longer than Rodmans,
Id say both are little bit over 6'6 right now.
edwards said on 17/Jan/19
@phenom89 .yes canson is true.i agree with canson.he’s lost 2-3” more like 1-1.5 which is easy with the life he lead and the back problems he has had. Hulk Hoganhas lost around 2” from his. You see another guy David Prowse that has lost several inches. Rob pegs him at 6’1” today and judging by his head size he had tohave been a good few inches taller. I don’t know if he was ever really 6’6 as I’m undecided on his peak but I’d say he could easily have been 6’5” or a bit over. I don’t completely rule out 6’6”. So that’s 4” if not more.
@phenom89 .yes canson is true.i agree with canson.he’s lost 2-3” more like 1-1.5 which is easy with the life he lead and the back problems he has had. Hulk Hoganhas lost around 2” from his. You see another guy David Prowse that has lost several inches. Rob pegs him at 6’1” today and judging by his head size he had tohave been a good few inches taller. I don’t know if he was ever really 6’6 as I’m undecided on his peak but I’d say he could easily have been 6’5” or a bit over. I don’t completely rule out 6’6”. So that’s 4” if not more.
edwards said on 17/Jan/19
yes taker may be bit lesser than 6'6 but at night at extreme low.i personl guess is he wakesup at 6"7 and through out the day he remains in 6'6 and at night he shrinks to 6"5.75 .the only time i see taker being lesser than 6'6 is at night at extreme low.his night night maybe 6"6.75.i dont even buy 6'5.5.even at night 6'5.5 is extremely low for him.
yes taker may be bit lesser than 6'6 but at night at extreme low.i personl guess is he wakesup at 6"7 and through out the day he remains in 6'6 and at night he shrinks to 6"5.75 .the only time i see taker being lesser than 6'6 is at night at extreme low.his night night maybe 6"6.75.i dont even buy 6'5.5.even at night 6'5.5 is extremely low for him.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 17/Jan/19
@rawdshaq
Define "bigger". Do you mean Triple H has more muscle than you, or he has overall more mass? His body today isn't an example of how a 6'1"-6'2" 255lbs man should look like. 10-20 years ago yes, but not today.
@rawdshaq
Define "bigger". Do you mean Triple H has more muscle than you, or he has overall more mass? His body today isn't an example of how a 6'1"-6'2" 255lbs man should look like. 10-20 years ago yes, but not today.
rawdshaq said on 17/Jan/19
Nishanth Hegde Dude 14-15 biceps for Undertaker is a joke. He has minimum 17" biceps. You can't compare his biceps to smaller people. His arms are very big. There are scrawny kids with a little bit of extra weight who have 15 inch biceps. Undertaker biceps are 18" - 20".
Nishanth Hegde Dude 14-15 biceps for Undertaker is a joke. He has minimum 17" biceps. You can't compare his biceps to smaller people. His arms are very big. There are scrawny kids with a little bit of extra weight who have 15 inch biceps. Undertaker biceps are 18" - 20".
rawdshaq said on 17/Jan/19
I think Undertaker was 6' 7 1/2" at peak for sure or even 6' 8" but today you have to consider that Undertaker is 53 years old with a countless amount of surgeries done to him and he also looks barely 4 inches taller than Triple H which puts him at 6' 5" if Triple H is 6' 1". Obviously he was slouching so 6' 5 1/2" which any normal human would round up to 6' 6". He can have 6' 6" but I think his exact height is 6' 5 1/2".
A good example of Undertakers height loss are his matches with Mick Foley. Back in 1998 Undertaker was 4 - 5 inches taller than Mick Foley who was 6' 3" at his peak which puts him at 6' 7" or 6' 8", but when he announced that he was going to the royal rumble 2 years ago in 2017 he walked right next to Mick Foley and appeared 2.5 inches taller max.
I think Undertaker was 6' 7 1/2" at peak for sure or even 6' 8" but today you have to consider that Undertaker is 53 years old with a countless amount of surgeries done to him and he also looks barely 4 inches taller than Triple H which puts him at 6' 5" if Triple H is 6' 1". Obviously he was slouching so 6' 5 1/2" which any normal human would round up to 6' 6". He can have 6' 6" but I think his exact height is 6' 5 1/2".
A good example of Undertakers height loss are his matches with Mick Foley. Back in 1998 Undertaker was 4 - 5 inches taller than Mick Foley who was 6' 3" at his peak which puts him at 6' 7" or 6' 8", but when he announced that he was going to the royal rumble 2 years ago in 2017 he walked right next to Mick Foley and appeared 2.5 inches taller max.
Dan Trojan said on 17/Jan/19
Phenom nice pic i was actually looking for a better pic with undertaker and rodman taker looks taller than rodman of course he's a little closer to the camera but honestly i'd say they'd be the same height just my opinion
Phenom nice pic i was actually looking for a better pic with undertaker and rodman taker looks taller than rodman of course he's a little closer to the camera but honestly i'd say they'd be the same height just my opinion
Phenom89 said on 17/Jan/19
Click Here
Excluding camera angle and other things, i would say half inch difference between Rodmann and Taker.
Click Here
Excluding camera angle and other things, i would say half inch difference between Rodmann and Taker.
Ozzy said on 17/Jan/19
We seen Love and undertaker photos.
Check this out Love measures well next to Yao Ming mobile.twitter.com/yahoosportsnba/status/1028029205911490560
We seen Love and undertaker photos.
Check this out Love measures well next to Yao Ming mobile.twitter.com/yahoosportsnba/status/1028029205911490560
Phenom89 said on 17/Jan/19
There is a video of Ric Flair's wedding , in the beginning of it Taker and Rodmann shaking hands. Angle is awful, but you wouldnt say Rodmann is the taller guy. If he is, he is not even a full inch taller than Taker.
6'5.5 or a hair less for the dead man
There is a video of Ric Flair's wedding , in the beginning of it Taker and Rodmann shaking hands. Angle is awful, but you wouldnt say Rodmann is the taller guy. If he is, he is not even a full inch taller than Taker.
6'5.5 or a hair less for the dead man
edwards said on 16/Jan/19
@moheez yes man,he is still in 6'6 range,dont know whether he is hair over it or a weaker 6'6.i can see this man being less than 6'6.
@moheez yes man,he is still in 6'6 range,dont know whether he is hair over it or a weaker 6'6.i can see this man being less than 6'6.
Canson said on 16/Jan/19
@Phenom89: I doubt he’s lost 2-3” more like 1-1.5 which is easy with the life he lead and the back problems he has had. Hulk Hogan has lost around 2” from his. You see another guy David Prowse that has lost several inches. Rob pegs him at 6’1” today and judging by his head size he had to have been a good few inches taller. I don’t know if he was ever really 6’6 as I’m undecided on his peak but I’d say he could easily have been 6’5” or a bit over. I don’t completely rule out 6’6”. So that’s 4” if not more
@Phenom89: I doubt he’s lost 2-3” more like 1-1.5 which is easy with the life he lead and the back problems he has had. Hulk Hogan has lost around 2” from his. You see another guy David Prowse that has lost several inches. Rob pegs him at 6’1” today and judging by his head size he had to have been a good few inches taller. I don’t know if he was ever really 6’6 as I’m undecided on his peak but I’d say he could easily have been 6’5” or a bit over. I don’t completely rule out 6’6”. So that’s 4” if not more
Canson said on 16/Jan/19
6’7.5 at a low is possible for his peak but really more Magic Johnson size 201cm at a low or a hair less. He would’ve been 6’8 out of bed most likely. Today 6’6” at a low is prob best case
6’7.5 at a low is possible for his peak but really more Magic Johnson size 201cm at a low or a hair less. He would’ve been 6’8 out of bed most likely. Today 6’6” at a low is prob best case
Vegas' said on 16/Jan/19
Phenom89 said on 14/Jan/19
My opinion is that undertaker never saw 6'7.5 peak. A hair over 6'6.5 is the max i buy for him. And this fits with 6'9.5 Big show. With 6'1.5 peak Hhh. With 6'11 khali ecc. ecc.
----------
Peak 6'9 range for Show? I didn't meet him when he was peak fitness but I did meet him a number of times in person between 2001 and 2010 and he was taller than 6'9 out of gear then. Taller in person in 2010 than Michael Kingma who Rob has here at 6'9.
A 6'9 peak Show would drop Kane and Taker down to 6'5 peak range.
Khali was measured 7'0.5 barefoot according to Meltzer.
Phenom89 said on 14/Jan/19
My opinion is that undertaker never saw 6'7.5 peak. A hair over 6'6.5 is the max i buy for him. And this fits with 6'9.5 Big show. With 6'1.5 peak Hhh. With 6'11 khali ecc. ecc.
----------
Peak 6'9 range for Show? I didn't meet him when he was peak fitness but I did meet him a number of times in person between 2001 and 2010 and he was taller than 6'9 out of gear then. Taller in person in 2010 than Michael Kingma who Rob has here at 6'9.
A 6'9 peak Show would drop Kane and Taker down to 6'5 peak range.
Khali was measured 7'0.5 barefoot according to Meltzer.
Canson said on 16/Jan/19
@Rob: to what you said, I think Taker is a guy who measures taller than he stands and walks. He may be able to stretch to 6’6” still. If not probably still weak 6’6” but in pics with guys his size in the Ring he still looks the full 6’6”. But someone said it once I believe Bobby3342 that a 6’6 guy can give the impression of being 6’4 at times if he has poor posture
@Rob: to what you said, I think Taker is a guy who measures taller than he stands and walks. He may be able to stretch to 6’6” still. If not probably still weak 6’6” but in pics with guys his size in the Ring he still looks the full 6’6”. But someone said it once I believe Bobby3342 that a 6’6 guy can give the impression of being 6’4 at times if he has poor posture
edwards said on 16/Jan/19
@canson yes dude,he is one of the greatest ,if not the greatest in wwe.its pretty much disgusting when someone else brings other topic for dabate.the site is totally height related.and bty some photos postef here do no justice,all are to show that taker is not as tall as people seems but i personally still think even 6'5.5 is too low given the fact that he rarely stand straight and has a big head for his height.at the end of the i still think he is 6'6 not a cm less.above all we all know that guy aint low as 6'5 or 6'5.5 as much people here consider him to be.
@canson yes dude,he is one of the greatest ,if not the greatest in wwe.its pretty much disgusting when someone else brings other topic for dabate.the site is totally height related.and bty some photos postef here do no justice,all are to show that taker is not as tall as people seems but i personally still think even 6'5.5 is too low given the fact that he rarely stand straight and has a big head for his height.at the end of the i still think he is 6'6 not a cm less.above all we all know that guy aint low as 6'5 or 6'5.5 as much people here consider him to be.
rawdshaq said on 15/Jan/19
I'm about 235-240 pounds and Triple H is bigger than me. I'm 5' 10", too. Triple H was 270 pounds at his prime probably but lost weight, and he is proud of that and he chooses to have that as his billed weight.
And yes, I'm very fat. Don't comment on it
I'm about 235-240 pounds and Triple H is bigger than me. I'm 5' 10", too. Triple H was 270 pounds at his prime probably but lost weight, and he is proud of that and he chooses to have that as his billed weight.
And yes, I'm very fat. Don't comment on it
Moheez said on 15/Jan/19
Rob, would you say undertaker current height is 6"5.5-6"6.25? I agree he was 6"7.5 Mark during his younger days.
Editor Rob
Rob, would you say undertaker current height is 6"5.5-6"6.25? I agree he was 6"7.5 Mark during his younger days.
Editor RobUndertaker might look sub 6ft 6 now...what he measures though is one of the tougher guesses. Can he really stretch up still over 6ft 6? Or max out at that....
Phenom89 said on 14/Jan/19
My opinion is that undertaker never saw 6'7.5 peak. A hair over 6'6.5 is the max i buy for him. And this fits with 6'9.5 Big show. With 6'1.5 peak Hhh. With 6'11 khali ecc. ecc.
My opinion is that undertaker never saw 6'7.5 peak. A hair over 6'6.5 is the max i buy for him. And this fits with 6'9.5 Big show. With 6'1.5 peak Hhh. With 6'11 khali ecc. ecc.
Phenom89 said on 14/Jan/19
One more thing i want say is that Undertaker's bad posture has become the only Undertaker's posture. Opposite to the ministry era, 1999, he has completely changed his posture. He does not standing straight and you can see it in every step he takes.
Yeah height loss...but how can a man lose 2-3 inches like that?
Lose 2-3 inches means become an other person, completely.
I should belive he was same height of Love now?? Looking at their picture?? Come on is not possible.
One more thing i want say is that Undertaker's bad posture has become the only Undertaker's posture. Opposite to the ministry era, 1999, he has completely changed his posture. He does not standing straight and you can see it in every step he takes.
Yeah height loss...but how can a man lose 2-3 inches like that?
Lose 2-3 inches means become an other person, completely.
I should belive he was same height of Love now?? Looking at their picture?? Come on is not possible.
Phenom89 said on 14/Jan/19
Talking about joshua, he is 0.5/0.25 inch shorter than Vladimir Klitschko. So now i dont know how much taker can be taller.
About taker shape...when you are so big, and "old"(wrestling age) and you stop training the result is obviously that one.
I think he is training less than half of the times he used to train before(until 6-7 year ago), so its normal that he does not look huge as before.
If you look at his interview with pastor Young, hoe can you say tha he still hige as before? Come on , he looks retired.
Talking about joshua, he is 0.5/0.25 inch shorter than Vladimir Klitschko. So now i dont know how much taker can be taller.
About taker shape...when you are so big, and "old"(wrestling age) and you stop training the result is obviously that one.
I think he is training less than half of the times he used to train before(until 6-7 year ago), so its normal that he does not look huge as before.
If you look at his interview with pastor Young, hoe can you say tha he still hige as before? Come on , he looks retired.
Canson said on 14/Jan/19
@Edwards: I think we can all agree he is one of the greatest but I agree with you. This site is about determining his height
@Edwards: I think we can all agree he is one of the greatest but I agree with you. This site is about determining his height
edwards said on 14/Jan/19
@rawdshaq i dont wanna argue with some desperate guy like you.the page is totally height related.everybody knows taker is arguably of the greatest if not the greatest to step in squared circle.
@rawdshaq i dont wanna argue with some desperate guy like you.the page is totally height related.everybody knows taker is arguably of the greatest if not the greatest to step in squared circle.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 13/Jan/19
@rawdshaq
Triple H is no 255lbs nowadays. He was in the 2000's though.
@rawdshaq
Triple H is no 255lbs nowadays. He was in the 2000's though.
rawdshaq said on 13/Jan/19
What does "increase my English" mean? Please man put some effort into your English please! Who cares if he is any height, he's a legend.
What does "increase my English" mean? Please man put some effort into your English please! Who cares if he is any height, he's a legend.
Nishanth Hegde said on 13/Jan/19
Coming to Undertaker's biceps, I think he has got a 14.5 to 15 inch biceps. He has lost his shape as he is not actively involved in wrestling or training anymore. I just saw a photo of Taker and Andrew Bird (Birdman) and he looks to be 2 inches shorter than Birdman. However I have also seen photos where Taker genuinely looks like a 6ft4 human as well as photos where he looks 6ft7.
Coming to Undertaker's biceps, I think he has got a 14.5 to 15 inch biceps. He has lost his shape as he is not actively involved in wrestling or training anymore. I just saw a photo of Taker and Andrew Bird (Birdman) and he looks to be 2 inches shorter than Birdman. However I have also seen photos where Taker genuinely looks like a 6ft4 human as well as photos where he looks 6ft7.
edwards said on 12/Jan/19
those who think taker is only 6'5 must really be desendant of dwarf.the guy has worse posture and stand straight occasionally.i admit that at times,i also ones thought that taker was 6'5 but after seeing so many proofs.taker aint low as 6'5.if he stand straight for measurement i am personally 100% sure that the guy hovers at 6'6.the lowest i see for him is 6'6.5. (6'5 is obviously joke for him)many people who have met him guessed him at 6'6.if the guy was only 6'5 then how could he stack up against guy like corbin and stroman.and for some people here who still goes by billied height and weight,i have nothing to say but a troll.taker is still 6'6 and thats my word.some photos posted here do no justice.i have no words for people who still goes by billed height and weight
those who think taker is only 6'5 must really be desendant of dwarf.the guy has worse posture and stand straight occasionally.i admit that at times,i also ones thought that taker was 6'5 but after seeing so many proofs.taker aint low as 6'5.if he stand straight for measurement i am personally 100% sure that the guy hovers at 6'6.the lowest i see for him is 6'6.5. (6'5 is obviously joke for him)many people who have met him guessed him at 6'6.if the guy was only 6'5 then how could he stack up against guy like corbin and stroman.and for some people here who still goes by billied height and weight,i have nothing to say but a troll.taker is still 6'6 and thats my word.some photos posted here do no justice.i have no words for people who still goes by billed height and weight
edwards said on 12/Jan/19
@rawdshaq dude,i may have to increase my english but i aint no desperate like you,lets cut to the chase.man its not like that but you sound so desperate man.you are the only one who didnt understand my english.
@rawdshaq dude,i may have to increase my english but i aint no desperate like you,lets cut to the chase.man its not like that but you sound so desperate man.you are the only one who didnt understand my english.
edwards said on 12/Jan/19
@rawdshaq mate those photos do no justice,i never told taker wasnt muscular.he was muscular at past mainly from 2005-2008.i am talking about current state of taker.have you seen taker being muscular lately??you told why the hell would a company want somebody to be listed heavier than they are?yes bro wwe makes its star taller then they actually are and heavier than they actually are,thats billed height and weight.if you wanna go by billed weight you can go.you are one of those guys who believes in billied height,you have much to learn about billied height and weight.i dont wanna argue more.255 is his billied weight.if you wanna believe thats upto you.i am talking about current state of taker.the photos posted do no justice.those are of past when taker was at prime.
@rawdshaq mate those photos do no justice,i never told taker wasnt muscular.he was muscular at past mainly from 2005-2008.i am talking about current state of taker.have you seen taker being muscular lately??you told why the hell would a company want somebody to be listed heavier than they are?yes bro wwe makes its star taller then they actually are and heavier than they actually are,thats billed height and weight.if you wanna go by billed weight you can go.you are one of those guys who believes in billied height,you have much to learn about billied height and weight.i dont wanna argue more.255 is his billied weight.if you wanna believe thats upto you.i am talking about current state of taker.the photos posted do no justice.those are of past when taker was at prime.
Canson said on 12/Jan/19
@Vegas: not much different than upgrading
@Vegas: not much different than upgrading
edwards said on 12/Jan/19
@rawdshaq i never told taker wasnt muscular.i only told he is out of shape and past his prime.if you wanna think taker is still very lean and muscular,thats upto you,thats no problem to me,lol ,if you wanna beleve taker has 20 inch biceps.believe atleast i personally dont think so.
@rawdshaq i never told taker wasnt muscular.i only told he is out of shape and past his prime.if you wanna think taker is still very lean and muscular,thats upto you,thats no problem to me,lol ,if you wanna beleve taker has 20 inch biceps.believe atleast i personally dont think so.
rawdshaq said on 12/Jan/19
Also please work on your English man! Not trying to sound like that but it's really hard to read your paragraphs sometimes @edwards
Also please work on your English man! Not trying to sound like that but it's really hard to read your paragraphs sometimes @edwards
rawdshaq said on 12/Jan/19
@edwards Dude are you kidding me? Undertaker is not fat. He still has great muscle and he is lean.
Click Here Does he look out of shape and weak there? Those are real big biceps, and also why the hell would a company want somebody to be listed heavier than they are? If anything they will list their weight under to make them seem more athletic. Triple H is 255 pounds, and is proud of it and wants it to be his listed weight.
Click Here Still looks great there.
Click Here That's 2007 Undertaker. Looks in amazing shape.
Bro find a picture where Undertaker looks fat. He is in great shape. Also he is very muscular. If he wasn't muscular then he would have never been able to pick up 95% of the people he has lifted.
I did wrestle in high school and yes wearing a singlet does make you look more muscular however, I think Undertaker has 18" - 20" biceps.
@edwards Dude are you kidding me? Undertaker is not fat. He still has great muscle and he is lean.
Click Here Does he look out of shape and weak there? Those are real big biceps, and also why the hell would a company want somebody to be listed heavier than they are? If anything they will list their weight under to make them seem more athletic. Triple H is 255 pounds, and is proud of it and wants it to be his listed weight.
Click Here Still looks great there.
Click Here That's 2007 Undertaker. Looks in amazing shape.
Bro find a picture where Undertaker looks fat. He is in great shape. Also he is very muscular. If he wasn't muscular then he would have never been able to pick up 95% of the people he has lifted.
I did wrestle in high school and yes wearing a singlet does make you look more muscular however, I think Undertaker has 18" - 20" biceps.
Canson said on 11/Jan/19
Taker was definitely taller at his peak than Joshua. Taker was 6’7” peak while AJ is 6’5.75 today
Taker was definitely taller at his peak than Joshua. Taker was 6’7” peak while AJ is 6’5.75 today
edwards said on 11/Jan/19
i never said joshua is taller than taller.i meant how person physique can help them appear taller.taker is still 6'6 or may be weak 6'6.but joshua or deontay wilder is much leaner and muscular if you cimpared them with current physique of taker.i didnt mean they are taller,i only meant they can appear taller due to their physique.taker on the otherhand who i believe is weak 6'6 developing bad posture through out years and is physically out of shape.maybe taller is as taller than wilder or joshua,who know?i am just saying about their appearance and how being lean can contribute in someone appearing taller.
i never said joshua is taller than taller.i meant how person physique can help them appear taller.taker is still 6'6 or may be weak 6'6.but joshua or deontay wilder is much leaner and muscular if you cimpared them with current physique of taker.i didnt mean they are taller,i only meant they can appear taller due to their physique.taker on the otherhand who i believe is weak 6'6 developing bad posture through out years and is physically out of shape.maybe taller is as taller than wilder or joshua,who know?i am just saying about their appearance and how being lean can contribute in someone appearing taller.
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 11/Jan/19
Mark calaways bio real height 6ft8 310 pounds billed 6ft10.5 210cm.
Mark calaways bio real height 6ft8 310 pounds billed 6ft10.5 210cm.
edwards said on 11/Jan/19
@dan trojan yes dude,i agree with you.i personally believe he is 6'6 but i think that he is 1 cm to max 1.5 cm shorter than corbin.weak 6'6 may also be arguable.
@dan trojan yes dude,i agree with you.i personally believe he is 6'6 but i think that he is 1 cm to max 1.5 cm shorter than corbin.weak 6'6 may also be arguable.
edwards said on 11/Jan/19
@rawdshaq a big Lol dude,i never told that taker wasnt muscular.he was only myscular in 1999 (his ministry days) and early 2007 and 2008.after 2008 taker was never muscular again.maybe he is in good shape but not muscular.good look at hulk hogan who is older than taker,look at gold berg,those guys are in shape for theur,everyone knows he aint in shape these days.atleast for me,i have hard times seeing taker being myscular except un 1999 to 2007-08 which were his geydays.lol he is fat when you compared his physique through out the year,he has grown fatter through out the years.he was leaner back then.and bty personally i dont think triple h is 255 pounds,its his billied weight, wwe likes to make or claim their stars taller than they actually are,they also like to make their stars heavier than they really are.look at his matches with roman reign at wrestlemania 33,you will see he was getting fatter since then.bty taker was biggest in 1999-2002 during his ministry and biker days but he was leaner from 2007 onwards for his physiques through out his career.and bty taker wasnt that muscular back in 90s and 2000,obviously he was in great shape but wasnt muscular.he was muscular only from 2006-2008,afterwards he suffered several injuries and concussion and wasnt muscular.taker aint in shape these days
@rawdshaq a big Lol dude,i never told that taker wasnt muscular.he was only myscular in 1999 (his ministry days) and early 2007 and 2008.after 2008 taker was never muscular again.maybe he is in good shape but not muscular.good look at hulk hogan who is older than taker,look at gold berg,those guys are in shape for theur,everyone knows he aint in shape these days.atleast for me,i have hard times seeing taker being myscular except un 1999 to 2007-08 which were his geydays.lol he is fat when you compared his physique through out the year,he has grown fatter through out the years.he was leaner back then.and bty personally i dont think triple h is 255 pounds,its his billied weight, wwe likes to make or claim their stars taller than they actually are,they also like to make their stars heavier than they really are.look at his matches with roman reign at wrestlemania 33,you will see he was getting fatter since then.bty taker was biggest in 1999-2002 during his ministry and biker days but he was leaner from 2007 onwards for his physiques through out his career.and bty taker wasnt that muscular back in 90s and 2000,obviously he was in great shape but wasnt muscular.he was muscular only from 2006-2008,afterwards he suffered several injuries and concussion and wasnt muscular.taker aint in shape these days
edwards said on 11/Jan/19
@xpac99 viscera aka mabel is i guess strong 6'6 and taker looks an inch taller.maybe taker looked 6'7 at those times since it was one of taker's tallest days.
@xpac99 viscera aka mabel is i guess strong 6'6 and taker looks an inch taller.maybe taker looked 6'7 at those times since it was one of taker's tallest days.
edwards said on 10/Jan/19
@tim181 at peak obviously taker was taller than taker,no doubt over there.even today i dont know that but taker maybe taller than joshua.but due to joshua's leaner and muscular body .he can appear taller than current taker.who knows,taker maybe taller in reality but joshua looks taller due to the given reason.i only told that its persons physiques that plays a great role.anoether example is a lean and skinny 6 feet dude can appear taller than a big and obese 6'2 dude.but in reality,we all know that obese dude is taller cause he is 6'2.i only told how physique can play great role on how someone would look and appear.
@tim181 at peak obviously taker was taller than taker,no doubt over there.even today i dont know that but taker maybe taller than joshua.but due to joshua's leaner and muscular body .he can appear taller than current taker.who knows,taker maybe taller in reality but joshua looks taller due to the given reason.i only told that its persons physiques that plays a great role.anoether example is a lean and skinny 6 feet dude can appear taller than a big and obese 6'2 dude.but in reality,we all know that obese dude is taller cause he is 6'2.i only told how physique can play great role on how someone would look and appear.
Vegas' said on 10/Jan/19
tim181 said on 10/Jan/19
@edawrds Taker always gave of a taller impression than Joshua, in fact its Joshua who looks short for 6'6 to me. Wilder on the other hand looks taller because he's slim. But Taker I think is still over 6'6
--------------
Peak Taker was taller next to peak Rock than Joshua is next to older Rock
Click Here
Click Here
If Joshua was a wrestler we would have many downgrading him to 6'4 lol Click Here
tim181 said on 10/Jan/19
@edawrds Taker always gave of a taller impression than Joshua, in fact its Joshua who looks short for 6'6 to me. Wilder on the other hand looks taller because he's slim. But Taker I think is still over 6'6
--------------
Peak Taker was taller next to peak Rock than Joshua is next to older Rock
Click Here
Click Here
If Joshua was a wrestler we would have many downgrading him to 6'4 lol Click Here
Canson said on 10/Jan/19
Kanter is closer to 6’9 than 10. NBA measurements are in the morning. I don’t rule 206-207 or a full 207 out but 208 I do.
Kanter is closer to 6’9 than 10. NBA measurements are in the morning. I don’t rule 206-207 or a full 207 out but 208 I do.
rawdshaq said on 10/Jan/19
@edwards Undertaker always has been ripped. He had insane muscles back in the 90s and especially the late 2000s (surprisingly) and he might have lost some muscle over the years but he still has no problem delivering a tombstone to a 255 pound man (Triple H). He is not obese and he is not fat either, he has a bit of a belly, yes, but he is still in great shape for his age.
@edwards Undertaker always has been ripped. He had insane muscles back in the 90s and especially the late 2000s (surprisingly) and he might have lost some muscle over the years but he still has no problem delivering a tombstone to a 255 pound man (Triple H). He is not obese and he is not fat either, he has a bit of a belly, yes, but he is still in great shape for his age.
Canson said on 10/Jan/19
@Joe: that’s not more than about 5” difference between them. Maybe Chandler is 6’11 and some change but Melo isn’t under 6’6” Unless he didnt have time on his feet when I saw him. With Kobe he also looks at least 6’6” as he does with Lebron
@Joe: that’s not more than about 5” difference between them. Maybe Chandler is 6’11 and some change but Melo isn’t under 6’6” Unless he didnt have time on his feet when I saw him. With Kobe he also looks at least 6’6” as he does with Lebron
Dan Trojan said on 10/Jan/19
Sorry i meant canson i was responding to your question from earlier
Sorry i meant canson i was responding to your question from earlier
Dan Trojan said on 10/Jan/19
Edwards honestly with shaen michaels i'd say it looks around 7 inches it's hard to tell because the undertaker is doing what he usually does with shorter guys and leaning down to their level so i'd say still around 6'6" and with triple h it was harder to tell but there is a photo of a faceoff between them at the event and it looked like 5 inches so again i'm concluding 6'6"
Edwards honestly with shaen michaels i'd say it looks around 7 inches it's hard to tell because the undertaker is doing what he usually does with shorter guys and leaning down to their level so i'd say still around 6'6" and with triple h it was harder to tell but there is a photo of a faceoff between them at the event and it looked like 5 inches so again i'm concluding 6'6"
tim181 said on 10/Jan/19
@edawrds Taker always gave of a taller impression than Joshua, in fact its Joshua who looks short for 6'6 to me. Wilder on the other hand looks taller because he's slim. But Taker I think is still over 6'6
@edawrds Taker always gave of a taller impression than Joshua, in fact its Joshua who looks short for 6'6 to me. Wilder on the other hand looks taller because he's slim. But Taker I think is still over 6'6
edwards said on 10/Jan/19
on the other days, i personally though that persons physique plays a great role on how tall a person look.for example , baron corbin who is also 6'6 is leaner and have small head for his height appears taller than undertaker who is at worst 6'5.5 to max weak 6'6.even if corbin and taker maybe same height even so corbin can appear taller for most part due to his straight posture,leaner body and small head.on the other hand taker who has a developed relatively worse posture through the years,taker has larger head,taker is also physically out of space is obese these days growing big belly and big fats through out body.taker is obese these days and may look shorter and its my personal opinion and idk about others.taker and corbin maybe equal and taker maybe man 1cm to 1.5cm shorter than corbin.i can also tell that back untill 2014 taker still looked strong 6'6 or maybe 6'6.5 due to fact that taker was leaner and bit skinny and had that kind of tall aura.other example include pro boxers like anthony joshua and deontay wilder who are also also 6'6 looks too tall due to fact that they are muscular and so leaner,on the other side guys like taker is obese and physically out of shape with big belly and becoming fatter everyday,so thats all corbin and taker maybe equal due to corbin being leaner,having straight posture and small head while taker being obese,big head and worst posture,if you measure those guys corbin and taker,i personally think both could be equall while corbin being only 1 cm to max 1.5 cm taller and thats my personal opinion.
on the other days, i personally though that persons physique plays a great role on how tall a person look.for example , baron corbin who is also 6'6 is leaner and have small head for his height appears taller than undertaker who is at worst 6'5.5 to max weak 6'6.even if corbin and taker maybe same height even so corbin can appear taller for most part due to his straight posture,leaner body and small head.on the other hand taker who has a developed relatively worse posture through the years,taker has larger head,taker is also physically out of space is obese these days growing big belly and big fats through out body.taker is obese these days and may look shorter and its my personal opinion and idk about others.taker and corbin maybe equal and taker maybe man 1cm to 1.5cm shorter than corbin.i can also tell that back untill 2014 taker still looked strong 6'6 or maybe 6'6.5 due to fact that taker was leaner and bit skinny and had that kind of tall aura.other example include pro boxers like anthony joshua and deontay wilder who are also also 6'6 looks too tall due to fact that they are muscular and so leaner,on the other side guys like taker is obese and physically out of shape with big belly and becoming fatter everyday,so thats all corbin and taker maybe equal due to corbin being leaner,having straight posture and small head while taker being obese,big head and worst posture,if you measure those guys corbin and taker,i personally think both could be equall while corbin being only 1 cm to max 1.5 cm taller and thats my personal opinion.
edwards said on 10/Jan/19
@ dan trojan hope you will meet mate
@ dan trojan hope you will meet mate
rawdshaq said on 9/Jan/19
You know guys, whether Undertaker is 6' 10", or 6' 4", in the end of day, he still puts on the greatest matches and is the greatest wrestler of all time. At this point of career, I'm sure he can give 0 Fs about his height, and I am sure he is aware that he isn't as tall as he used to be. He has 6' 5 1/2" and maybe even 6' 5" flat from me. I'm sure if he was even lower he would still be just as successful as a wrestler as he would have with a 6'7 1/2" peak.
Just close the discussion guys, if you wanna believe he is 6' 5" or 6' 8", that's up to you. Although my opinion was changed, you aren't going to be lucky with most people. Just respect the legend for what he has done for the business and not how tall he is.
Final note, and not to sound like a douchebag, but who really cares? He towers over everybody anyway so he is clearly tall enough.
You know guys, whether Undertaker is 6' 10", or 6' 4", in the end of day, he still puts on the greatest matches and is the greatest wrestler of all time. At this point of career, I'm sure he can give 0 Fs about his height, and I am sure he is aware that he isn't as tall as he used to be. He has 6' 5 1/2" and maybe even 6' 5" flat from me. I'm sure if he was even lower he would still be just as successful as a wrestler as he would have with a 6'7 1/2" peak.
Just close the discussion guys, if you wanna believe he is 6' 5" or 6' 8", that's up to you. Although my opinion was changed, you aren't going to be lucky with most people. Just respect the legend for what he has done for the business and not how tall he is.
Final note, and not to sound like a douchebag, but who really cares? He towers over everybody anyway so he is clearly tall enough.
Canson said on 9/Jan/19
Click Here
Love is not 2” taller than Lebron in this picture. Compare to the top of their heads not Love’s hair which people here are doing, and also factor that Love is favored slightly in the first pic
Click Here
Love with 6’10 Joakim Noah
Click Here
Love with 6’10 Chris Bosh
Click Here
Click Here
Lebron with Bosh
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
I could make the same argument here if I wanted and say Lebron is taller than Love but I know he’s not. If Love is taller it’s by around a CM or half inch but not 2”. Love was described by Dan Majerle as 6’7” below. Maybe not flat 6’7” but could be something like 6’7.25 or 6’7.5 max and Lebron could even be a hair under 6’7” perhaps. Even possible it’s a little less than 1cm
Click Here
Click Here
Love is not 2” taller than Lebron in this picture. Compare to the top of their heads not Love’s hair which people here are doing, and also factor that Love is favored slightly in the first pic
Click Here
Love with 6’10 Joakim Noah
Click Here
Love with 6’10 Chris Bosh
Click Here
Click Here
Lebron with Bosh
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
I could make the same argument here if I wanted and say Lebron is taller than Love but I know he’s not. If Love is taller it’s by around a CM or half inch but not 2”. Love was described by Dan Majerle as 6’7” below. Maybe not flat 6’7” but could be something like 6’7.25 or 6’7.5 max and Lebron could even be a hair under 6’7” perhaps. Even possible it’s a little less than 1cm
Click Here
Canson said on 9/Jan/19
@Dan Trojan: how tall would you say Taker looks with Shawn Michaels in 2018? I’d say it’s easier with Triple H since he still looks 6’1” range
Click Here
Or Triple H?
Click Here
@Dan Trojan: how tall would you say Taker looks with Shawn Michaels in 2018? I’d say it’s easier with Triple H since he still looks 6’1” range
Click Here
Or Triple H?
Click Here
joe###ro said on 9/Jan/19
Canson
6'11 for Tyson so Carmelo would have to be demoted to less than 6'6
Canson
6'11 for Tyson so Carmelo would have to be demoted to less than 6'6
Canson said on 9/Jan/19
Love and Lebron are around the same height. It’s not more than half inch difference between them maximum. The pics that were posted here aren’t that good
Love and Lebron are around the same height. It’s not more than half inch difference between them maximum. The pics that were posted here aren’t that good
Vegas' said on 9/Jan/19
Photos you normally can't trust, even videos can be deceiving at times.
Take this one. Taker looks 6'4 range next to Big Show in 1999 after 15 second mark Click Here
Photos you normally can't trust, even videos can be deceiving at times.
Take this one. Taker looks 6'4 range next to Big Show in 1999 after 15 second mark Click Here
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.