Leah said on 2/Jun/09
Actually, Flash_of_eden, Ryan Reynolds is listed as 6'2" on this very site.
Clay said on 2/Jun/09
I just watched the video of Pattinson and Ryan Reynolds and Pattinson is slouching while RR is standing up very straight.
Clay said on 2/Jun/09
Ryan Reynolds is 6'2.25, 6'3 in most shoes.
flash_of_eden said on 2/Jun/09
The presenter is Ryan Reynolds, who is 6'3".
Leah said on 1/Jun/09
Anyone who believes he is more than 6ft - go to youtube and watch a clip of him with K Stewart at the MTV Awards 2009. When they get up to accept their "best kiss" award for Twilight, the male presenter is much taller than Robert Pattinson. I'm not sure who the male presenter is (he doesn't look familiar), but I'm sure he isn't 6'1 and yet he's taller than R. Pattinson. Here's the link:
Click Here and the video owner is: Cullensxblacks, for reference.
Clay: while I don't suggest R. Pattinson is short, I do not believe he is 6'1". I would estimate that he is no taller than 6ft. My best friend is "in love" with him and I am subjected view many of her pictures of him (photoshoots with other castmates, etc). From these pictures I can tell he is definitely not 6'1.
Clay said on 1/Jun/09
In that Pattinson/Patel pic I wonder what the footwear situation is. if they are wearing the same shoes than Pattinson is no more than 6 foot flat with shoes on... because Patel is absolutely not more than 6'2.... at least not yet.
cinemagoer said on 30/May/09
comparing him to dev patel ( who is supposed to be 6'2'' ), robert looks more like 6'0'' than 6'1''
Clay said on 23/May/09
Well Leah how tall do you think he is ? He's absolutely not less than 6 foot. And those girls he met were probably wearing heels.
Clay said on 23/May/09
In that pic with Patel he looks more than an inch shorter but we don't know what type of shoes Patel is wearing. Patel is no more than 6'2 now so Rob would have to be about 6 foot, maybe 6 foot and a half.
love tall guys said on 22/May/09
i think 6,1 is correct. he is soo hot. He's got really long legs
flash_of_eden said on 16/May/09
He's definitely 6'1" at the very least, probably nearer 6'2" first thing in the morning.
MD said on 13/May/09
That's actually far more than a 'tad' and definitely more than half-and-inch, for sure.
Buga said on 12/May/09
Click Herehe is a tad smaller than dev patel. I'd say 6ft1 sounds correct
Leah said on 11/May/09
OMG, 6ft 1?! Are you kidding me? Just go to perez hilton's site and look up Rob Pattinson. There's a bunch of entries with teenaged girls who met him in London and took their pictures with him. Almost every single one of them is only one inch shorter. Just because he's taller than his castmates doesn't mean he's a giant (in Hollywood standards of course).
kara said on 11/May/09
kristen 163cm
ashley 164cm or a weak 5"5
nikki 163 /164 cm
taylor lautner 5"6/5"7
Rachelle 5"6 /5"7
kellan 6"1
peter 5"10
anna kendrick a strong 5"1
justin chon 167cm
robert 6"1
elizabeth/esme 5"2?
cam: a weak 6 foot
Jackson : a weak 5"9
hiya. said on 6/May/09
he is 6'2 i have the official robert pattinson book and it said in there
hey. said on 5/May/09
He really would not lie about his height...
lillie said on 3/May/09
he towers over the twilight cast,
i doubt he'd lie about his height anyway.
stella said on 28/Apr/09
i love robert pattinson(L)
miana said on 28/Apr/09
i thought he was a short. well.. he looked in the picture like that but i might be mistaken because cameras always enlarge.
Clay said on 20/Apr/09
In LA, outside a radio station where he was coming to do an interview.... my sister dragged me along. He was just as tall as his body guards.
hey. said on 19/Apr/09
Nice Clay, where did you meet him?
Clay said on 16/Apr/09
John, hate to burst your bubble but he's a legit 6'1 guy, at the worst he's 6 foot a half without shoes. I've met him and trust me.. saying he's below 6 foot is beyond stupid.
hey. said on 12/Apr/09
Lol, he lost 5 cm because of his hair? No, I'd say, still, he looks a good 6'1.5"/6'2". Big guy.
Alternateuniverse said on 10/Apr/09
Now with his haircut, I'd say 1m80 max.
T.L said on 5/Apr/09
Rob is around 6.1 and a half cuz he's not that much taller then Kellan when their beside each other and in most pics one is either slunching of the camera is in favor of one person. I'd say no taller then 6.1 1/2
Ace said on 1/Apr/09
He does look 6`1 next to Rupert Grint:
Click HereHe looks near 6`1 (considering he is farther from the camera) next to Jason Isaacs:
Click HereAlthough, he doesn't look 6`1 here:
Click Here
Anonymous said on 29/Mar/09
It's really quite simple people. go find a cardboard cutout of him! I just bought one and I was totally boggled as to why it's huge next to me (I'm 5'4"). That's why I came here to figure out what his height is and if the cutout is actual size. Now I see, he's totally 6'1". (And I wish my cutout was real...)
John said on 26/Mar/09
this guy's 6-0 max. or even lower.
sprint84 said on 25/Mar/09
In any cast photos from Twilight, he's shorter than Billy Burke. Burke's listed here as 6'1", though he may be taller. Even so, Pattinson is AT MOST 6'1" and likely just under that.
I think the reason he seems so tall (besides the hair) is that in both Harry Potter and Twilight, most of his costars were around 5'4"-5'6".
amela said on 19/Mar/09
hey robert pattison can never be 185com,he is much shorter then "emmet"..kallen lutz?are u blind???
ameriknujr said on 13/Mar/09
6ft1.5 surely
pink floyd said on 12/Mar/09
hahahaha yeah he reminds me to chuck bass too strong 6' near to 6'1
Anonymous said on 10/Mar/09
Ah, well, Ace, that's easily explained -- he's standing in back of him (and the angle is favoring Lutz).
Ace said on 9/Mar/09
He sure doesn't look 6`1 here:
Click HereAlthough its odd, they usually look similarish in height.
Brian said on 8/Mar/09
He seems to be taller. I`d say 6ft1.25 at least if not 6ft1.5
Wado said on 1/Mar/09
Click HereKellan is basically pushing Rob down in all of these photos but, as seen in this photo, the two men are definitely around the same height with Rob being slightly taller. Thus, I think it's safe to say Rob is a very strong 6'1" or a weak 6'2"....
Polly said on 20/Feb/09
Definatly 6ft1. Me and my dad met him in a cafe in November 2007 in London. My dad is 6ft exactly and he was about an inch or more taller than him. I am 5ft 5 and I came up to about the top of his sholder. :)
Ashley said on 15/Feb/09
Well, i guess he must be taller than that, he was only 17 years old in 2006
Jenny said on 10/Feb/09
i love his height 6'1". Its so nice and tall. Perfect height for a guy i think. And hes really sexy =D
Im 5'8" and i want a bf whos like 6'0"-6'1" cus then i can wear heels and not tower over him lol
Brian said on 9/Feb/09
I personnally think he`s the best example for a strong 6ft1 guy. 6ft1 really fits.
LOL said on 7/Feb/09
i give to him 6'0, or 6'0.5" max, but no 6' 1"
anonymous said on 31/Jan/09
He doesn't look 6`1 here with kellan lutz:
Click HereI can find very few photos of the two together where either are standing straight. This is the best one.
Daria said on 31/Jan/09
For some reason he keeps reminding me of Chuck Bass
lexie said on 29/Jan/09
my cousins are 6'4/5 and when he stood next to her he wasn't as tall as she was so 6'1/2 is very close.
Anonymous said on 20/Jan/09
Click HereAlthough his hair does add a bit of a delusion (he seems about 3 inches taller than Kellan with the hair) he does seem about an inch taller than Kellan considering where their eyes are, posture, etc. I'd say 6'2".
5 ft 3.2 said on 19/Jan/09
That sounds perfect. 6'1" is about right.
Anonymous said on 17/Jan/09
Click HereHuge compared to the 5'4" Stew!
Also, I love his big head as well.
Anonymous said on 17/Jan/09
this sounds weird but that "big" head looks good on him :DD he wouldnt be THAT good looking if he had a small head lol
Anonymous said on 16/Jan/09
If he had a regular size head he would be about 5'11
linebacker40 said on 13/Jan/09
6'1"-6'2" for him
Anonymous said on 10/Jan/09
Does anyone have a good photo of Bob and Leno?
Brent said on 7/Jan/09
he is 6'1 flat no taller or shorter, and he looks at least 1.5-2 inches taller than 5'11 Jay Leno
Anonymous said on 6/Jan/09
@ Paddy:
First, Bob looks TALLER THAN Isaacs and Fiennes, not shorter.
Second, it's not a very good photo because of the angle. If you have a straight on shot in which Rob is shorter, I'd listen, but all of them I've seen with Isaacs, Rob has been taller.
Assilem said on 4/Jan/09
yeah, i saw pad's pic...
it's really amazing.
Paddy said on 2/Jan/09
Robert Pattison is 21 now, right? In 2005, he was 18.
This is a pic from 2005 :
Click HereOn the photo, he is shorter than 5'11-6'0 Ralph Fiennes and Jason Isaacs.
Could have he grown so much after 18th birthday till 21st now?
Interesting. Wonders happen, don't they?:)
Nick said on 29/Dec/08
saw him on Leno, he looks a solid 6foot him and leno stood almost eye to eye and leno is 5'11
LuAnn said on 28/Dec/08
Rob is that and taller! I saw him as Cedric Diggery in Harry Patter and he looked like a giant in comparison to Harry Potter! Kristen is 5'6" tall. The girl that played Alice in Twilight is 5'5", and she and Bella are about the same height. He may be taller than 6'1"! Look at him in the Vanity Fair adds...he is much taller than the rest of those people. What is your problem, Annonymous???
MarcustheSwede said on 27/Dec/08
Model height in runway shows are ideal to be 180-188cm. In the biggest and best runway shows like Dsquared there are top Models male that are 180 centimeters and they perform as perfect as all the others.
Anonymous said on 26/Dec/08
Henkka, have you met him?
And, Derrick, who was the comment directed at exactly? Common sense is epitomized in my previous post.
And Rob has always been listed as 6'1"+ as far as I know. Even back when he was in GoF. So it's not like they've upped him a few inches just because he's famous now.
Hailey said on 25/Dec/08
185 is average for models actully. all i can say is robert pattinson will always be the best actor of my life. i love you !
Henkka said on 23/Dec/08
I think this is pretty accurate. I'm 184 cm and he's only slightly taller than me, so I'd say 185-186 is correct.
Derrick said on 22/Dec/08
Leave it to Twilight fans to defy common sense. He is 6'0 at most.
Razz said on 17/Dec/08
Okay, officially, Taylor Lautner is said to be 5'6...so what does that mean for the cast members of Twilight? They seem shorter than their actual given height whether or not lautner is 5'6 or under>
Click HereClick Here
Anonymous said on 14/Dec/08
I seriously think he is taller than 6'1", he just looks surprisingly tall compared to everyone I've seen him with! Even if he does slouch, he looks tall!
iloveedward said on 13/Dec/08
did anyone see him on tyra? they never really stood exactly next to each other but it seemed to me she was taller than him in her heels. did anyone else see that episode? what do you think?
Anonymous said on 12/Dec/08
He does not look taller than Lutz in that video. His hair is deceiving.
Killing Joke said on 11/Dec/08
His lifesize standup is listed at 6'2 search it on google. Pretty accurate
anonymouse said on 8/Dec/08
ya i think he is 6'1 or even a little taller but not more then 6'3
J.J said on 8/Dec/08
this height is spot on because he is exactly 4 inches taller than 5'9" Taylor Lautner
Anonymous said on 6/Dec/08
He's easily over 6'.
Click Here With Lutz he seems a bit taller or at the very least a 1/2" taller. Again, I guess 6'2"+.
casiotech said on 5/Dec/08
Also looking at the leno footage, he looks 2" taller than a 5'10'' leno.
casiotech said on 5/Dec/08
doubt this guy is over 6'. It's easy to give him more height next to harry potter and the short potter cast but in twilight he looks 5'11''-6'
Emily Johnson said on 1/Dec/08
No way Jay Leno is 5'9"--my husband and I met him. My hubbie is 5'9" and Jay was a few inches taller.
Anonymous said on 30/Nov/08
Click HereIf Stew is 5'4" (even slightly under that!), there is no way Pattinson is only 6'1". Plus, many reports have called him tall (Stew has mentioned this about 10 times) and 6'2" plus is what I'm guessing a tall claim constitutes. Upgrade to at least 6'1.5" is needed, although I think it's quite obvious that he's taller than that.
Anonymous said on 28/Nov/08
Camera angles, Anonymous. Robert is closer to the camera than Kellan and appears taller as a result. He wouldn't even be 6'2" according to that picture, he would be about 6'5"! Haha. I remember seeing a picture of Robert standing next to Tyra Banks and she dwarfed him. Isn't she about 5'10" (6'0"+ in heels)?
anonymous said on 28/Nov/08
he didn't "dwarf" Leno jon, but he did have a few inches on him:
Click Here
Viper said on 28/Nov/08
If Leno is 5-9 then 95 percent of the celebs on here need to be downgraded.
jon said on 28/Nov/08
he looked as tall as jay, get your eyes checked MD, Jay Leno is short and fat, he dwarfed Jay Leno and he was bending as low as possible when he greeted him plus he has very poor posture. He is easily 6'1" and jay leno is 5'9 in bare feet.
MD said on 27/Nov/08
He was on the Tonight Show with Jay Leno, the other night, and he looked as tall as Jay, or perhaps half-an-inch taller, but not anything more. 6'1" would seem the top of the scale unless I see some more proof.
Anonymous said on 26/Nov/08
Because it's satisfying, Del. Do you not see the satisfaction in this, come on! haha, there is actually really no point, I don't even know why this website exists, but it's sometimes fun to comment and debate.
But, I think that Rob is at least 6'2.25", look at this picture (sorry, it's not that great) with Lutz who is listed as 6'1". Plus, Rob looked huge in the film, didn't he?
Click Here
Emily said on 25/Nov/08
6'2" is 188cm right?
it think he is 185 or something like that
Del said on 22/Nov/08
Why are u guys so obsessed with how tall people are?
Paddy said on 20/Nov/08
The pict posted by Oscar clearly indicates that Robert is no more than 183, in fact. Look at his legs, too. They aren't long at all, just thin. When I stand next to my 6'2.5 friend, I look the same as Robert next to Lutz in this very picture. I'm 184 myself, as mentiobed below.
Regards
Oscar said on 19/Nov/08
Click HereLutz looks higher, sorry abput the small pictue but if you see all the phoos you will notice that they are all using normal shoesand that even when lutz is not with the best posture he looks taller( despite the premiere photos where robert is the taller somehow)
Paddy said on 19/Nov/08
I'm 184cm and I look the same compared to 162cm person, whom happens to be my sister. So yes, he might be 6'1. Nothing more, though. Just look at photos of him, even lone. He doesn't look gigantic.
Kirsten said on 6/Nov/08
I've met him. I'm 6'0" without boots/heels and about 6'3"ish when I'm wearing a normal 4" heel. He was about 2 inches shorter than me. I'd say the 6'1" claim is pretty solid. Nice guy as well.
And Lautner looks just shy of 5'9" (check out pictures of him and Slater if you're unsure) and Rathbone seems like a weak [and questionable] 5'8" when he's standing next to a 5'5" Greene.
Anonymous said on 1/Nov/08
hahaa, I have no idea if they are actually dating, I just had to put that because I WISH they were dating and do indeed think that they will be dating soon with all this Twilight madness and the obvious sexual tension that is apparent in interviews. It's amazing. haha, anyway, I was just responding to your post with him next to Camilla Belle and, if you say he's only slightly taller, that would mean you think he's around 6', assuming her heels are around 3 inches. So, first, I think you're wrong in saying he looks only slightly taller, he's clearly not standing properly and still looks a good 2 to 3 inches taller. Plus, the photo is quite small, how are we supposed to compare properly? Are there any bigger photos? And, okay, sure she is going to look short compared to a 6' or over guy, but Rob has got to be a strong 6'1.5" or 6'2" because he is easily taller than Gigandet who is listed as 6' and Lutz who is listed as 6'1".G to a fansite and compare Robert to some of these other guys, he's a lot taller.
On another note, have you any idea how tall "Jacob" and "Jasper" actors are? I don' really know. I've heard Lautner (Jacob) is about 5'9" and I've heard nothing about Rathbone (awesome last name) haha. Let me know if you hear anything about them.
Loraine said on 31/Oct/08
they arent dating, they answered that question at the mtv music awards
Anonymous said on 31/Oct/08
He's dating Kristen Stewart? When did that happen? Didn't she JUST confirm she's dating Michael Angarano? And the reason she appears small next to Pattinson is because she's 5'4" (perhaps slightly under that). Of course, anyone 6' and over is going to appear huge next to her. I never said that he wasn't a strong 6'1". I believe he is. He just isn't 6'2" or over.
Anonymous said on 30/Oct/08
6'2" is hardly a giant and, in fact, only 1 inch higher than he's listed here.
Click Here &
Click HereGigandet is listed as 6' many places and they are wearing quite similar footwear and, come on, Stewart looks almost if not more than a head shorter than him! He's definitely a very strong 6'1" or 6'2"; many cast mates have spoken of his height, including Stewart (his girlfriend) herself.
Anonymous said on 28/Oct/08
Next to a 5'8" Camilla Belle, Pattinson looks only slightly taller. (Yes, I've taken into account heels and dress shoes.) He's not a giant. Get over it, Twilight fanatics.
Click Here
Anonymous said on 20/Oct/08
Click HereHe seems to tower over Ed Westwick, who, though not listed on here, seems to be around 5'9" or 5'10" compared to others on his show. I think he's at least 6'2" because, look at this, he once again absolutely towers over Stewart and 5'4" should not look THAT short compared to a 6'1"er. --->
Click HereUpgrade please; I'm sure other Twilighters would agree---> he looks so tall in the promos.
Tammy said on 18/Oct/08
I believe on this... He's so tall and I love it!!!! Rob is hot!
Venessa Smith said on 10/Oct/08
I do not care how tall he is. Rob is still very cute despite his hieght. So all of you stop complaining.He is HOT!!! I am an obsessed Rob/Twilight fan and I don't care how tall he is. He still cute.
Anonymous said on 9/Oct/08
Russel Brand towered over him at the VMA's. 6'1'' tops.
Anonymous said on 6/Oct/08
Not really Sera....come on, be reasonable (referring to the hair comment). Also, how have you even seen photos of Lutz and Rob? The only reason I've seen pictures is because I'm an obsessed Twilight/Rob fan and look at photos on youtube, don't tell me you do this as well?! haha, and from viewing these I'd say the following:
Kristen: 5'3" to 5'4".
Robert: 6'2"
Taylor (Lautner):5'10"
Cam Gigandet: 6'
Jackson Rathbone: 5'10" to 6' (not sure about this guy?)
Ashely Greene: 5'4"
Reed: 5'5" to 5'6"
Stephanie: 5'4"
Wow, I'm going to stop, the cast is huge! Oh, and Lutz is 6'1" I believe.
Sera said on 5/Oct/08
He is in no way taller than 6'1". Or Kellan Lutz, for that matter. If Pattison appears taller it's his hair. I swear, it sticks up like 4 inches off of his head.
Anonymous said on 2/Oct/08
Upgrade to 6'1.25" at least m8, come on Robert! (Editor Rob is whom I'm speaking of, of course ;)). If you see some images from the Twilight premiere and he's taller than Lutz (& others) will you please upgrade this guy? Also, what are your opinions of the other actors in Twilight....Stewart, Lautner, Lutz, Gigandet, etc.? I know that Lutz is listed as 6'1" on here and Rob is clearly taller than him, so I'm wondering why you think Rob's not over 6'1".....? Sorry, you probably haven't got much time to respond, but if you do, go for it....
Anonymous said on 30/Sep/08
Click HereHe towered over the 5'8"ish Grint as well.
Anonymous said on 30/Sep/08
Robert (Editor), do you think that you'll ever upgrade this guy to over 6'1" because next to Lutz, Gigandet, Stewart, Brand, etc. he looks at least 6'2" without question.....?
Editor Rob
I'm hoping pattinson does another con in uk next year, I missed him the last time doh! I doubt he's over 6ft 1, he has nice big hairstyle though...
Anonymous said on 28/Sep/08
Also, I think that Lutz's and Gigandet's heights are accurate - Gigandet was quite a bit taller than Mischa 5'9"ish Barton when he was on the OC, so, if this is true, there is NO way R-Pattz is less than 6'2"ish.
Anonymous said on 26/Sep/08
Yes Sarah and plus he towers over Stewart who's about 5'4". I actually feel like he towers over everyone I see him with.....
Anonymous said on 24/Sep/08
Can anyone on this site give any input? I'm saying it - he's not less than 6'2".
Sarah said on 24/Sep/08
He's slightly taller than Kellan Lutz and taller than Gigandet they list themselves as 6 1 and 6 foot. Pattinson is easily 6 foot 1. Just check out the photos in his fansites.
Anonymous said on 8/Sep/08
Click Here Granted they're all kind of slouching....even without Rob's hair he is easily more than an inch taller than Cam and they're wearing somewhat equal footwear. UPGRADE. Plus, where did you actually see pictures of Russell Brand and Rob together, ANon? I saw him "presenting", but he looked taller than Russell, not shorter.
Anonymous said on 8/Sep/08
I think he may be taller than 6'1" because, as "so" said, he is taller than Kellan Lutz and also because at the VMAs he TOWERED over the rest of the cast (who were there) and he wasn't wearing any shoes with noticeable heel on them.....Gigandet is listed consistently at 6' and Lautner 5'9" or 5'10" I believe. Stewart is 5'4" or a little under I'd say and was wearing heels, however, Rob still towered over all these people; twas crazy. He was also taller than the 6'2" host Russell Brand....Can someone explain this to me?
Click HereI was honestly so surprised when I saw these photos....granted some of them have weird angles, but even the normal angled shots show that he is quite close to 6'2" or 6'3".....he's definitely tall, thin, and HOT. :D.
Anonymous said on 8/Sep/08
Was shorter than 6'1" Russel Brand at yesterday's MTV VMA's.
So said on 7/Sep/08
He is taller than Kellan Lutz who is listed 6 ft 1 too
rrr said on 9/Aug/08
6'1...theres a scene where daniel radcliffe is talking to him and he easily has 6 - 7 inches of him.
Tiffany said on 10/Jun/08
From my perspective, I definetely agree with the solid 5'11. Doesn't matter anyway, he's still attractive.
Anonymous said on 26/May/08
If anonymous, use that. If named, use who. Look at pictures and interviews of him and the 5'4" (according to this site) Kristen Stewart. He looks, at the least, 61.5" or 6'2", maybe a little above 6'2". Rob, take a look at this one.....
Click Here
Anonymous said on 19/May/08
He's easily 6'1", 6'2" is probably closer. He's tall, obviously.
Vampiric said on 7/May/08
6'1, huh? I'd have to say 5'11 or 6 feet, not more.
TK said on 13/Apr/08
Weird, because in the 'Twilight set' (search on Youtube) videos next to 5'6 Kirsten Stewart he looks atleast 6'2 (I only know this because I'm 5'4 and my dad is 6'1). Though, my mum is 5'5 and there does look like a big height differance between them. Very confusing...
xaoxio said on 12/Dec/07
well, Rob, are you sure about this guy???
Cause looking at photos with Jason Isaacs and Ralph Fiennes he looks no taller than 5'11".
Is it camera angle or what? How can you explain this?
btoy said on 16/Oct/07
Chris, so if that is so, then Alan Rickman would be lying, because Dan comes up to his noise, while he comes up to Rob's chin, and that could be the 1 inch diff. though.
Hugo said on 2/Sep/07
I always thought he looked a solid 5'10".
184-186cm said on 26/Dec/06
As far as Robert is concerned I do believe hes more 181 cm like. My theory is based on the fact that Tom Felton is 5'9 and most pics hes 2 inch shorter than Pattinson and that makes Robert 5'11 - right?
chris said on 5/Dec/06
Alan Rickman is also supposed to be 6'1", and the top of Dan's head comes to Alan's nose in the GOF scene where they stand facing each other discussing the gillyweed stolen from the potions storage cupboard. Compare that to the scenes of Dan next to Robert -- Dan's head is up to Robert's chin. So how do Alan and Robert compare? Which of them is really 6'1"? Too bad we never saw them together in the film!!!
karee said on 6/May/06
Wow, Serene, you actually are agreeing with me! lol jk
Serene said on 26/Apr/06
john link.. you are right..
Robert looks 6'1".. handsomely.. haha.. sorry but Dan is kinda short..really
john link said on 17/Apr/06
I think this height is pretty accurate. In Goblet of Fire, there is a scene where Dan and Robert stand right next to each other. I have a still of this and the height difference between the two is huge! Robert is more than a head taller than Dan. It leads me to believe that Dan is more in the 5'4" range. Dan really is that short.
Coffeecakes said on 22/Feb/06
I would say he is at least 6'1. There is a video that I will link that shows the footage of the two of them at Ny red carpet premiere
http://www.robertpattinson.org/download/pafiledb.php?action=file&id=31
Just download it and you'll see that Robert is at first leaning down to take pics with jason. As soon as he stand straight, it's obvious he is at least 2 inches taller.
Serene said on 25/Jan/06
Karee, Tom Felton is not as tall was Robert. He is about 1-2.5inches shorter than Robert..
Karee said on 2/Jan/06
Is Tom Felton as tall as Robert?
Ma.erika said on 2/Jan/06
I think he is really 6'1 bec. he is taller in the other cast of the movie of the goblet of fire and I like his taller ^ _ ^] maria_erika@mugglenet.com
Kelsey said on 1/Jan/06
I htink he is really 6'1". He seems much taller than the other actors in Goblet of Fire.
AA said on 30/Dec/05
I met this guy, 'cause my dad works at Warner! I'm 6 foot 1 and he's certainly 1 inch shorter!!! HE'S 6', mayde 5' 11.5"!!!
Editor Rob
those photos of him beside Jason Isaacs didn't make him look 6ft 1, so...
Serene said on 23/Nov/05
No way, he is really 6'1". And how do u know that he is just 6'?
divad said on 21/Nov/05
Hes not 6 1.......6 feet mabe