Add a Comment4297 comments
Average Guess (743 Votes)
6ft 2.23in (188.6cm)
6ft 2.23in (188.6cm)
Alex said on 5/Oct/07
Vegas, too bad they weren't side by side in that picture but you can't tell much from that picture. But he looks like he would be close to that guys height. 6'2 looks pretty accurate for him with a 6'3 Hogan.
Vegas, too bad they weren't side by side in that picture but you can't tell much from that picture. But he looks like he would be close to that guys height. 6'2 looks pretty accurate for him with a 6'3 Hogan.
6'3.5'' said on 5/Oct/07
Brock can easily get away with 6'3'', but i think he is more 6'2'' though Legit
Brock can easily get away with 6'3'', but i think he is more 6'2'' though Legit
Anonymous said on 5/Oct/07
i would say his hight up right actually exceeds 6 3 because he was only an inch shorter than leviathan who is 6 5
i would say his hight up right actually exceeds 6 3 because he was only an inch shorter than leviathan who is 6 5
Jason said on 5/Oct/07
Alex says on 4/Oct/07
''I don't want Hogan to be taller.''
Let's downgrade him, then. :D
Alex says on 4/Oct/07
''I don't want Hogan to be taller.''
Let's downgrade him, then. :D
Viper said on 5/Oct/07
I think Hogan is max 6-2 1/2 there, for what it worth.
I think Hogan is max 6-2 1/2 there, for what it worth.
Jason said on 4/Oct/07
Don't tell me you're going by the staredown in that vid? Hogan's relaxed with his head down while Lesnar's arching himself up like a cobra lol.
Don't tell me you're going by the staredown in that vid? Hogan's relaxed with his head down while Lesnar's arching himself up like a cobra lol.
Alex said on 4/Oct/07
I don't want Hogan to be taller. From what I saw, Hogan had an inch on Lesnar. Lesnar 6'2 and Hogan 6'3 there.
I don't want Hogan to be taller. From what I saw, Hogan had an inch on Lesnar. Lesnar 6'2 and Hogan 6'3 there.
Rusty james said on 4/Oct/07
No hulk hogan wasnt taller than him.it was the other way around. U just want him to be taller than brock.
big deal i saw lesnar at the passport to pain tour in 2003 and he's not 6 ft 1. this website is stupid,according to everyone here,wrestlers must shrink by about 2 inches a day.
so now ur saying hogan is 6'2"? i prove my point.
No hulk hogan wasnt taller than him.it was the other way around. U just want him to be taller than brock.
big deal i saw lesnar at the passport to pain tour in 2003 and he's not 6 ft 1. this website is stupid,according to everyone here,wrestlers must shrink by about 2 inches a day.
so now ur saying hogan is 6'2"? i prove my point.
Alex said on 4/Oct/07
Kevin, yea Hogan was 6'3 or so and he only had Lesnar by around an inch. Lesnar looks 6'2 there as well.
Kevin, yea Hogan was 6'3 or so and he only had Lesnar by around an inch. Lesnar looks 6'2 there as well.
Jason said on 4/Oct/07
Jason says on 30/Jun/07
wolverinejoe80 says on 29/Jun/07
''he was measured officially at 6ft 2. they shouldn't be any debate on his height.''
He was listed at 6'2'', it's unknown what he was measured at exactly.
Jason says on 30/Jun/07
wolverinejoe80 says on 29/Jun/07
''he was measured officially at 6ft 2. they shouldn't be any debate on his height.''
He was listed at 6'2'', it's unknown what he was measured at exactly.
Kevin Durant said on 4/Oct/07
Brock Lesnar was measured at 6'2", when he try out in the NFL more than 3 years ago. I cannot see this guy under 6'2" because Hulk Hogan was 1.5" Inches taller than him when they face each other in Smackdown.
Click Here
Brock Lesnar was measured at 6'2", when he try out in the NFL more than 3 years ago. I cannot see this guy under 6'2" because Hulk Hogan was 1.5" Inches taller than him when they face each other in Smackdown.
Click Here
Alex said on 4/Oct/07
Brock can get away with 6'3-6'4 from a distance though. I'd say he would be closer to 6'1 than 6'3 for his height but I'm sticking in the middle and saying 6'2. Thats what I thouht he was for a while now.
Brock can get away with 6'3-6'4 from a distance though. I'd say he would be closer to 6'1 than 6'3 for his height but I'm sticking in the middle and saying 6'2. Thats what I thouht he was for a while now.
Jason said on 4/Oct/07
Rusty james says on 28/Sep/07
''Brock lesnar 6 ft 1? HA yeah right ive seen him,and he is 6 ft 3. watch any of the matches between brock and cena,and brock has a fair few inches on him.plus he's well bigger.''
I've seen him in person, too - and in ring gear at that - and there's no way he was 6'3''. He was closer to 6'1''.
Rusty james says on 28/Sep/07
''Brock lesnar 6 ft 1? HA yeah right ive seen him,and he is 6 ft 3. watch any of the matches between brock and cena,and brock has a fair few inches on him.plus he's well bigger.''
I've seen him in person, too - and in ring gear at that - and there's no way he was 6'3''. He was closer to 6'1''.
Jason said on 4/Oct/07
Viper says on 3/Oct/07
''There is a better chance of Lesnar being 6-1 than 6-3.''
I would say there's zero chance of Lesnar being 6'3'' lol. I reckon he's 6'1 1/2'' ... but what's half an inch? :)
Viper says on 3/Oct/07
''There is a better chance of Lesnar being 6-1 than 6-3.''
I would say there's zero chance of Lesnar being 6'3'' lol. I reckon he's 6'1 1/2'' ... but what's half an inch? :)
6'3.5'' JK said on 3/Oct/07
''Viper says on 2/Oct/07
Lesnar has an inch at most on Cena.'' - I agree with that
''Viper says on 2/Oct/07
Lesnar has an inch at most on Cena.'' - I agree with that
Viper said on 3/Oct/07
There is a better chance of Lesnar being 6-1 than 6-3.
There is a better chance of Lesnar being 6-1 than 6-3.
Alex said on 2/Oct/07
I saw at least an inch between the 2. Maybe 1.25 inches, 1.5 inches at the very most.
I saw at least an inch between the 2. Maybe 1.25 inches, 1.5 inches at the very most.
Viper said on 2/Oct/07
Lesnar has an inch at most on Cena.
Lesnar has an inch at most on Cena.
Roger said on 1/Oct/07
Brock is exactly 6'3" barefoot.
Brock is exactly 6'3" barefoot.
Rusty james said on 28/Sep/07
Brock lesnar 6 ft 1? HA yeah right ive seen him,and he is 6 ft 3. watch any of the matches between brock and cena,and brock has a fair few inches on him.plus he's well bigger.
Brock lesnar 6 ft 1? HA yeah right ive seen him,and he is 6 ft 3. watch any of the matches between brock and cena,and brock has a fair few inches on him.plus he's well bigger.
6'3'' JK said on 3/Jul/07
No Alex I remember Exactly! he was wearing Reebok pumps and a Ruck Fules T Shirt
No Alex I remember Exactly! he was wearing Reebok pumps and a Ruck Fules T Shirt
Alex said on 2/Jul/07
Look at Lesnar in his recent fight. He def looks to have lost some weight. Still a big guy though. He's a bit more soft but I wouldn't say flabby though.
Click Here
Look at Lesnar in his recent fight. He def looks to have lost some weight. Still a big guy though. He's a bit more soft but I wouldn't say flabby though.
Click Here
Alex said on 2/Jul/07
JK, Cena I bet was in those Nike Shox. Those give 1.5 inches to your height so he was more 6'0.5 barefoot then. I'm that height and in shox I am 6'2 or a hair under.
JK, Cena I bet was in those Nike Shox. Those give 1.5 inches to your height so he was more 6'0.5 barefoot then. I'm that height and in shox I am 6'2 or a hair under.
Jason said on 2/Jul/07
I went with 6'2'' because I used to not think he could be below that and he did look around that, but I think more 6'1 1/2''.
I went with 6'2'' because I used to not think he could be below that and he did look around that, but I think more 6'1 1/2''.
6'3'' JK said on 1/Jul/07
But Alex if you think Cena is 6'0'' then you have to say Lesnar is 6'1'', im Sure even Viper agrees with me that there is ONLY 1 inch difference between them, When i Met Cena in 04 he was 6'2'' in sneakers
But Alex if you think Cena is 6'0'' then you have to say Lesnar is 6'1'', im Sure even Viper agrees with me that there is ONLY 1 inch difference between them, When i Met Cena in 04 he was 6'2'' in sneakers
Alex said on 1/Jul/07
Also you can be 6'2 and get away with 6'4. But 6'1 getting away with 6'4 isn't likely really, even on TV.
Also you can be 6'2 and get away with 6'4. But 6'1 getting away with 6'4 isn't likely really, even on TV.
Alex said on 1/Jul/07
He may have been measured at 6'1.5-6'1.75 to get listed at 6'2. This guys weighs only 260-265lbs today too. Ths guy was 285-290lbs in WWE. He looked it. I haven't seen him since he lost weight.
Jason you even said the guy looked 6'2 in person too not counting his footwear I think.
He may have been measured at 6'1.5-6'1.75 to get listed at 6'2. This guys weighs only 260-265lbs today too. Ths guy was 285-290lbs in WWE. He looked it. I haven't seen him since he lost weight.
Jason you even said the guy looked 6'2 in person too not counting his footwear I think.
shelton said on 1/Jul/07
I have question how much does brock lesnar wieghs and that means your website is exellent
I have question how much does brock lesnar wieghs and that means your website is exellent
Viper said on 30/Jun/07
"wolverinejoe80 says on 29/Jun/07
he was measured officially at 6ft 2. they shouldn't be any debate on his height."
He was listed at that height, not measured. I cant find any old measured height for him on couchscout. He's probably 6-1 1/4 at his tallest.
"wolverinejoe80 says on 29/Jun/07
he was measured officially at 6ft 2. they shouldn't be any debate on his height."
He was listed at that height, not measured. I cant find any old measured height for him on couchscout. He's probably 6-1 1/4 at his tallest.
Viper said on 30/Jun/07
Ive been saying Lesnar is 6-1 for 2 whole years now :)
Ive been saying Lesnar is 6-1 for 2 whole years now :)
Jason said on 30/Jun/07
wolverinejoe80 says on 29/Jun/07
''he was measured officially at 6ft 2. they shouldn't be any debate on his height.''
He was listed at 6'2'', it's unknown what he was measured at exactly.
wolverinejoe80 says on 29/Jun/07
''he was measured officially at 6ft 2. they shouldn't be any debate on his height.''
He was listed at 6'2'', it's unknown what he was measured at exactly.
6'3'' JK said on 30/Jun/07
I think Lesnar is 6'1'', Because if Cena is listed 6'0'' on this site then Lesnar has to be 6'1'', because there is an inch difference between them
I think Lesnar is 6'1'', Because if Cena is listed 6'0'' on this site then Lesnar has to be 6'1'', because there is an inch difference between them
wolverinejoe80 said on 29/Jun/07
he was measured officially at 6ft 2. they shouldn't be any debate on his height.
he was measured officially at 6ft 2. they shouldn't be any debate on his height.
Alex said on 4/Jun/07
Austin could have bigger boots. He's known for those cowboy type boots which would give him a bit more of height than Lesnar's boots.
Austin could have bigger boots. He's known for those cowboy type boots which would give him a bit more of height than Lesnar's boots.
JohnP said on 4/Jun/07
Click Here
In that video, Lesnar doesn't look much taller than Stone Cold Steve Austin (and many claims that Austin is about 6-0). I bet they were both wearing wrestling boots, so they are probably the same height difference when they are barefoot. Lesnar is probably not over 6-1.
Click Here
In that video, Lesnar doesn't look much taller than Stone Cold Steve Austin (and many claims that Austin is about 6-0). I bet they were both wearing wrestling boots, so they are probably the same height difference when they are barefoot. Lesnar is probably not over 6-1.
Jason said on 14/May/07
You're delusional, Danimal. There's nothing I could say that tops Ronnie saying his biggest ever off-season weight was 320. You've just got a bee in your bonnet because you were proven wrong and look like a tool.
BTW, post recent off-season pics if you want to attempt to prove anything. And I meant lean as in not fat ... that is lean to anyone who hasn't got a dumbell stuck in their brain.
''He is laughed at when doing guest poses with his B@tch T@ts and huge HG gut and waist.''
This shows you don't know as much as you'd like to think. His stomach and big waist due to being fat? Right...
You're delusional, Danimal. There's nothing I could say that tops Ronnie saying his biggest ever off-season weight was 320. You've just got a bee in your bonnet because you were proven wrong and look like a tool.
BTW, post recent off-season pics if you want to attempt to prove anything. And I meant lean as in not fat ... that is lean to anyone who hasn't got a dumbell stuck in their brain.
''He is laughed at when doing guest poses with his B@tch T@ts and huge HG gut and waist.''
This shows you don't know as much as you'd like to think. His stomach and big waist due to being fat? Right...
Alex said on 13/May/07
Danimal, the guy is a freak of nature. Funny how he would make guys like Lesnar, Batista, HHH look smaller than they really are. But also he's much shorter then those guys and you'll agree its much easier to be shorter and look bigger than when tall.
Danimal, the guy is a freak of nature. Funny how he would make guys like Lesnar, Batista, HHH look smaller than they really are. But also he's much shorter then those guys and you'll agree its much easier to be shorter and look bigger than when tall.
Danimal said on 13/May/07
YES JASON, this is VERRRRRY lean: Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Go back to school if you consider those pics showing a LEAN man..HAHAHAHA
YES JASON, this is VERRRRRY lean: Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Go back to school if you consider those pics showing a LEAN man..HAHAHAHA
Danimal said on 13/May/07
Ronnie is always lean in the off-season???? You are either the most IGNORANT person I've EVER encountered, or just intentionally like to instigate arguments. Go over to GETBIG.COM and go type that Ronnie is lean in the off-season!!!HAHAHAHAHAHA. He is laughed at when doing guest poses with his B@tch T@ts and huge HG gut and waist. Even the current Mr. Olympia (Jay Cutler), who they refer to as a FRIDGE is looking lean next to Ronnie. You have NO idea what you are talking about Jason. Educate yourself on bodybuilding before you open your mouth again. I LIVE for weights MATE!!!
Ronnie is always lean in the off-season???? You are either the most IGNORANT person I've EVER encountered, or just intentionally like to instigate arguments. Go over to GETBIG.COM and go type that Ronnie is lean in the off-season!!!HAHAHAHAHAHA. He is laughed at when doing guest poses with his B@tch T@ts and huge HG gut and waist. Even the current Mr. Olympia (Jay Cutler), who they refer to as a FRIDGE is looking lean next to Ronnie. You have NO idea what you are talking about Jason. Educate yourself on bodybuilding before you open your mouth again. I LIVE for weights MATE!!!
Jason said on 13/May/07
Danimal says on 12/May/07
''Case not closed. Ronnie competed at 294, as well as 287. In order to achieve those 2 weights he had to go over 330 pounds (Well over). He does not compete at less than 280 + pounds anylonger. When he competed at 250-260 pounds he went up to 300 pounds, but those days are long gone. Men like Lee Priest, who is less than 5'4" balloons up to 285 pounds off-season btw.''
Not really. He's always lean ... even in the off-season. I seriously can't see him downgrading his biggest ever weight. If anything, it's more likely the contest weights are exaggerated.
Danimal says on 12/May/07
''Case not closed. Ronnie competed at 294, as well as 287. In order to achieve those 2 weights he had to go over 330 pounds (Well over). He does not compete at less than 280 + pounds anylonger. When he competed at 250-260 pounds he went up to 300 pounds, but those days are long gone. Men like Lee Priest, who is less than 5'4" balloons up to 285 pounds off-season btw.''
Not really. He's always lean ... even in the off-season. I seriously can't see him downgrading his biggest ever weight. If anything, it's more likely the contest weights are exaggerated.
Vegas said on 13/May/07
hogan at 183cm means Andre the giant was around 6'5 peak. Andre looked roughly the same height as 7'1 listed Wilt Chamberlin in a photo, granted Andre was slightly closer to the camera and prob wearing bigger footwear but he would still need to be wearing stilts to look as tall as Wilt if he were just 6'5 seeing as he only ever had Hogan by approx 5". Those Italian boyz are on the good stuff, lol. a hell of a lot of people need to be downgraded if Hogan was just 6'0 such as Mr T who in reality was just 5'5 next to Hogan, muhammad ali approx 5'9-5'10 next to a 6'0 hogan lol, Shaq 6'7 etc. Hogan even today is still nearly as tall as David Hasselhoff and only looks approx 4-5" shorter than 7'0 listed Bill Wennington in a photo, maybe Wennington is just 6'4 in reality....
Anonymous1 you better ring up the NFL to tell them they were out by 2" on Lesnar. While you are at it ring up the NCAA and tell them they were out by 3" on him :D
hogan at 183cm means Andre the giant was around 6'5 peak. Andre looked roughly the same height as 7'1 listed Wilt Chamberlin in a photo, granted Andre was slightly closer to the camera and prob wearing bigger footwear but he would still need to be wearing stilts to look as tall as Wilt if he were just 6'5 seeing as he only ever had Hogan by approx 5". Those Italian boyz are on the good stuff, lol. a hell of a lot of people need to be downgraded if Hogan was just 6'0 such as Mr T who in reality was just 5'5 next to Hogan, muhammad ali approx 5'9-5'10 next to a 6'0 hogan lol, Shaq 6'7 etc. Hogan even today is still nearly as tall as David Hasselhoff and only looks approx 4-5" shorter than 7'0 listed Bill Wennington in a photo, maybe Wennington is just 6'4 in reality....
Anonymous1 you better ring up the NFL to tell them they were out by 2" on Lesnar. While you are at it ring up the NCAA and tell them they were out by 3" on him :D
Danimal said on 12/May/07
Case not closed. Ronnie competed at 294, as well as 287. In order to achieve those 2 weights he had to go over 330 pounds (Well over). He does not compete at less than 280 + pounds anylonger. When he competed at 250-260 pounds he went up to 300 pounds, but those days are long gone. Men like Lee Priest, who is less than 5'4" balloons up to 285 pounds off-season btw.
Case not closed. Ronnie competed at 294, as well as 287. In order to achieve those 2 weights he had to go over 330 pounds (Well over). He does not compete at less than 280 + pounds anylonger. When he competed at 250-260 pounds he went up to 300 pounds, but those days are long gone. Men like Lee Priest, who is less than 5'4" balloons up to 285 pounds off-season btw.
Alex said on 12/May/07
Coleman I seen listed at 330lbs in many places for his offseason weight. 320lbs I can believe or in between but whatever its HUGE especially if its all muscle on a 5'10 frame.
Coleman I seen listed at 330lbs in many places for his offseason weight. 320lbs I can believe or in between but whatever its HUGE especially if its all muscle on a 5'10 frame.
Alex said on 12/May/07
Coleman looks ungodly huge there though! I was showing someone at school and he was like holy f*cking sh*t.
Sorry I didn't refer that it was a different friend in the picture with Big Show so I got you confused. Reason the one with Big Show looks his weight is because he's 5'7-5'8 and my other friend is 6'0 so its tougher to look fatter when taller while both are in the same 5-10lb range.
Coleman looks ungodly huge there though! I was showing someone at school and he was like holy f*cking sh*t.
Sorry I didn't refer that it was a different friend in the picture with Big Show so I got you confused. Reason the one with Big Show looks his weight is because he's 5'7-5'8 and my other friend is 6'0 so its tougher to look fatter when taller while both are in the same 5-10lb range.
Anonymous1 said on 12/May/07
Look at the end of this (is it in italian) Click Here : arnold at 178; sylvester 170-173 and hogan at 183.
recently i saw on youtube one video of brock with stonecold: same height;with goldberg 2 inch shorter i give brock 184cm barefoot.
Look at the end of this (is it in italian) Click Here : arnold at 178; sylvester 170-173 and hogan at 183.
recently i saw on youtube one video of brock with stonecold: same height;with goldberg 2 inch shorter i give brock 184cm barefoot.
Jason said on 12/May/07
Alex, yeah, that is the picture. It looks photoshopped, though I don't think it is... lol
Alex, yeah, that is the picture. It looks photoshopped, though I don't think it is... lol
Jason said on 12/May/07
Ha! Like you wouldn't do that to me... ;)
Mate, he said 320 was his heaviest ever offseason weight. Case closed.
Ha! Like you wouldn't do that to me... ;)
Mate, he said 320 was his heaviest ever offseason weight. Case closed.
Danimal said on 10/May/07
Jason, thanks for rubbing that in my facen btw and Ronnie has gone over 320 pounds in the off-season. Ask ANYONE on Getbig.com....ANYONE.
Jason, thanks for rubbing that in my facen btw and Ronnie has gone over 320 pounds in the off-season. Ask ANYONE on Getbig.com....ANYONE.
Alex said on 10/May/07
Jason, you said my friend with Big Show looks heavier and thats a different kid to begin with but I posted a different picture of him months ago and I remember Viper said he looked 325lbs for sure, but with my 6'0 friend its harder for you guys to believe he's 320 plus pounds. I think its because he's 6'0 while the other kid is 5'7-5'8 and its more easier to tell when you're shorter. Thats really the best explanation. When they're both in the same 5-10 pound range but 4-5 inches apart that will throw you off.
Jason, you said my friend with Big Show looks heavier and thats a different kid to begin with but I posted a different picture of him months ago and I remember Viper said he looked 325lbs for sure, but with my 6'0 friend its harder for you guys to believe he's 320 plus pounds. I think its because he's 6'0 while the other kid is 5'7-5'8 and its more easier to tell when you're shorter. Thats really the best explanation. When they're both in the same 5-10 pound range but 4-5 inches apart that will throw you off.
Jason said on 9/May/07
To prove Danimal wrong, I asked Ronnie at prosource.net what his heaviest ever offseason weight was and he said 320.
I see the new pic of your friend now, dude. I agree with Viper he still looks similar in that pic, but the one with Big Show he looks more like it (was that the same guy?). You're right it can be hard to tell with photos sometimes, though. I was looking at a pic of that 6'4''-6'5'' guy I know yesterday and thinking how he didn't look so thick in it - but in person he is THICK.
I saw you said that about Lesnar. He didn't look over 280 in person in the first place, and may very well have been 270. He's deceiving because his legs aren't quite as big as the rest of him...
To prove Danimal wrong, I asked Ronnie at prosource.net what his heaviest ever offseason weight was and he said 320.
I see the new pic of your friend now, dude. I agree with Viper he still looks similar in that pic, but the one with Big Show he looks more like it (was that the same guy?). You're right it can be hard to tell with photos sometimes, though. I was looking at a pic of that 6'4''-6'5'' guy I know yesterday and thinking how he didn't look so thick in it - but in person he is THICK.
I saw you said that about Lesnar. He didn't look over 280 in person in the first place, and may very well have been 270. He's deceiving because his legs aren't quite as big as the rest of him...
Alex said on 9/May/07
Jason, the picture is working for me on here. Guess try again later. But Jason guessed myself and another friend of mine bang on yet he's off with these 2 fat guys by more than a bit. I guess its when they get very heavy or fat its tougher. Far as Coleman, I don't know Coleman personally, never seen him get on a scale so its different then with people I know. I read he was 330lbs offseason though.
Danimal, yea your guesses were very close to bang on with my 2 friends, even you guessed me close to my exact weight too. Being a personal trainer you need to be accurate with that stuff. I'm not bad myself at all with weight guessing. I come close sometimes too.
BTW, did you read Lesnar is down to 265-270lbs he said in an interview someone posted recently on this site. I forgot what height he claimed himself as though.
Jason, the picture is working for me on here. Guess try again later. But Jason guessed myself and another friend of mine bang on yet he's off with these 2 fat guys by more than a bit. I guess its when they get very heavy or fat its tougher. Far as Coleman, I don't know Coleman personally, never seen him get on a scale so its different then with people I know. I read he was 330lbs offseason though.
Danimal, yea your guesses were very close to bang on with my 2 friends, even you guessed me close to my exact weight too. Being a personal trainer you need to be accurate with that stuff. I'm not bad myself at all with weight guessing. I come close sometimes too.
BTW, did you read Lesnar is down to 265-270lbs he said in an interview someone posted recently on this site. I forgot what height he claimed himself as though.
Jason said on 9/May/07
Danimal also claimed Ronnie Coleman was ''minimum 340lbs'' at his biggest and I was ''foolish'' for claiming 320 ... then I asked the bloke himself & he said 320 lol. :P
Alex, the pic isn't working now. Is it just my computer? I'll try again later...
Danimal also claimed Ronnie Coleman was ''minimum 340lbs'' at his biggest and I was ''foolish'' for claiming 320 ... then I asked the bloke himself & he said 320 lol. :P
Alex, the pic isn't working now. Is it just my computer? I'll try again later...
Viper said on 8/May/07
Then you are a genius Danimal.
Then you are a genius Danimal.
Danimal said on 8/May/07
Viper and Jason, unfortunately your guessing at weight isn't very accurate. I pin pointed Alex's friends weights to a t! I usually come within 5-10 pounds for people's weight. As a personal trainer, I have to be able to judge pretty accurately.
Viper and Jason, unfortunately your guessing at weight isn't very accurate. I pin pointed Alex's friends weights to a t! I usually come within 5-10 pounds for people's weight. As a personal trainer, I have to be able to judge pretty accurately.
Viper said on 8/May/07
Guessing weight can be really hard at times.
Guessing weight can be really hard at times.
Alex said on 8/May/07
I wasn't trying to offend you though. You know what, I guessed him at 285lbs when he was 320-325lbs 3 years ago so I was in the same boat there too. Its because he's fat and not muscle and muscle wears more than fat. Someone 325lbs of muscle you're going to guess at that weight while someone who is 325lbs of fat like him may not look that heavy sometimes. Thats what it is.
I'm into this whole weight thing since I'm into weightlifting/working out. I sucked at it before 3-4 years ago.
I wasn't trying to offend you though. You know what, I guessed him at 285lbs when he was 320-325lbs 3 years ago so I was in the same boat there too. Its because he's fat and not muscle and muscle wears more than fat. Someone 325lbs of muscle you're going to guess at that weight while someone who is 325lbs of fat like him may not look that heavy sometimes. Thats what it is.
I'm into this whole weight thing since I'm into weightlifting/working out. I sucked at it before 3-4 years ago.
Viper said on 8/May/07
I still would say 290 there. Id love to know what Jason thinks. If Im terrible at weight guessing then hes in the same boat with me :)
I still would say 290 there. Id love to know what Jason thinks. If Im terrible at weight guessing then hes in the same boat with me :)
Alex said on 8/May/07
Wow, can't believe he still doesn't look 300lbs to you while he's quite a bit over. haha. He'd love your estimate on him though. I don't know it is where you can't see him being as much as he is.
You're a good poster and all and your posts are good to read, but you're estimates on weight aren't very good, no offense compared to your height estimates which are good where I agree on some of them. But weight can be tough but shows that when you're off by at least 30-40lbs.
Wow, can't believe he still doesn't look 300lbs to you while he's quite a bit over. haha. He'd love your estimate on him though. I don't know it is where you can't see him being as much as he is.
You're a good poster and all and your posts are good to read, but you're estimates on weight aren't very good, no offense compared to your height estimates which are good where I agree on some of them. But weight can be tough but shows that when you're off by at least 30-40lbs.
Viper said on 8/May/07
He still doesnt even look 300 pounds to me.
He still doesnt even look 300 pounds to me.
Alex said on 8/May/07
Alright Jason I have to try to convince you again lol, I got a better picture then the one from outdoors which was crappy because in everyway it made him look leaner, cloths, posture, angle he was at and its kinda better than the other one I showed you too inside, but this picture is from almost 2 years ago of my 6'0 friend and you can clearly tell he's over 300lbs, that or you underestimate weight. LOL
This is when he told me he went to the doctor's and weighed in at 334lbs with heavy cloths on so I tell him get on my scale and he weighs in at "error" on a scale that goes up to 330lbs as its max weight so he exceeded the weight limit and yes I know scales can be off but it was accurate with me though so I think you can now believe he's a legit 325lber. I know I've talked about this more than a little but its just that its someone who's weight I know for sure, not these celebrities who are debatable.
And Viper you said he looks no more than 280lbs and said I look at least 210lbs so in your mind me and my friend are just 60-70lbs apart, yea right!LOL You overestimate me but underestimate him. You're much better off at guessing heights which you're good at.
Click Here
Alright Jason I have to try to convince you again lol, I got a better picture then the one from outdoors which was crappy because in everyway it made him look leaner, cloths, posture, angle he was at and its kinda better than the other one I showed you too inside, but this picture is from almost 2 years ago of my 6'0 friend and you can clearly tell he's over 300lbs, that or you underestimate weight. LOL
This is when he told me he went to the doctor's and weighed in at 334lbs with heavy cloths on so I tell him get on my scale and he weighs in at "error" on a scale that goes up to 330lbs as its max weight so he exceeded the weight limit and yes I know scales can be off but it was accurate with me though so I think you can now believe he's a legit 325lber. I know I've talked about this more than a little but its just that its someone who's weight I know for sure, not these celebrities who are debatable.
And Viper you said he looks no more than 280lbs and said I look at least 210lbs so in your mind me and my friend are just 60-70lbs apart, yea right!LOL You overestimate me but underestimate him. You're much better off at guessing heights which you're good at.
Click Here
Alex said on 5/May/07
Jason, one time he said he was much less than he really was. Well he said to me himself that he went to the doctor's and the scale said 350lbs and he flipped out so he didn't boost his weight up, he just said what the scale said and wasn't happy about it as he was complaining to me, that time it may have been off because the scale at my gym is off by 10-20lbs, plus a few months later he weighs in at 325lbs I saw. YOu'll see fat guys saying that to feel more better about themselves and say the weight they want themselves to be. The reason he looked bigger indoors was because he was in better cloths, the one outside was a crap picture because the way he was standing was covering himself up and he was in dark blue cloths which will make him appear not as much. Some people think I'm like 220lbs while I'm really 200lbs then some think I'm less so it varies. I myself thought he was 290lbs then he weighs in at 325lbs on my scale so I underestimated him like you did too and its because he's fat and fat weighs less than muscle so fat people get underestimated sometimes. But sure I'll post a few more if I get some but I'm having trouble because after I host it from image shack and post it on this site it says the URL is too long.
Jason, one time he said he was much less than he really was. Well he said to me himself that he went to the doctor's and the scale said 350lbs and he flipped out so he didn't boost his weight up, he just said what the scale said and wasn't happy about it as he was complaining to me, that time it may have been off because the scale at my gym is off by 10-20lbs, plus a few months later he weighs in at 325lbs I saw. YOu'll see fat guys saying that to feel more better about themselves and say the weight they want themselves to be. The reason he looked bigger indoors was because he was in better cloths, the one outside was a crap picture because the way he was standing was covering himself up and he was in dark blue cloths which will make him appear not as much. Some people think I'm like 220lbs while I'm really 200lbs then some think I'm less so it varies. I myself thought he was 290lbs then he weighs in at 325lbs on my scale so I underestimated him like you did too and its because he's fat and fat weighs less than muscle so fat people get underestimated sometimes. But sure I'll post a few more if I get some but I'm having trouble because after I host it from image shack and post it on this site it says the URL is too long.
Jason said on 5/May/07
It's just I've seen scales go haywire before when someone's too heavy for them, and one of your friends said he was 350 (when you say 330?) so we know he likes to exaggerate his weight. Post some more pics, the 6'0'' one did look fatter in the indoors one -- maybe you'll convince us yet lol. Some guys do lie badly about their weight, though. I met this guy last year who claimed to be 110kg (243lbs) to some chicks ... and he wasn't over 200. I **** you not. That was the worst one ever ... just bizarre.
It's just I've seen scales go haywire before when someone's too heavy for them, and one of your friends said he was 350 (when you say 330?) so we know he likes to exaggerate his weight. Post some more pics, the 6'0'' one did look fatter in the indoors one -- maybe you'll convince us yet lol. Some guys do lie badly about their weight, though. I met this guy last year who claimed to be 110kg (243lbs) to some chicks ... and he wasn't over 200. I **** you not. That was the worst one ever ... just bizarre.
Alex said on 4/May/07
I never said he weighed 350lbs. I said 325lbs, 330lbs at most. Believe me he's more than 280-290lbs. He was a fat kid, same for the other one who was shorter who looked even more fatter. I'll repost the pics when I get them online again since I got a new computer now.
I never said he weighed 350lbs. I said 325lbs, 330lbs at most. Believe me he's more than 280-290lbs. He was a fat kid, same for the other one who was shorter who looked even more fatter. I'll repost the pics when I get them online again since I got a new computer now.
Viper said on 4/May/07
There is no way in hell that one guy was 350 pounds. Looked 280-290 max.
There is no way in hell that one guy was 350 pounds. Looked 280-290 max.
Alex said on 4/May/07
Believe what you want, but in person no way would you guess 280lbs for a 325lber. The scale was off that time because the max weight was 330lbs and he had heavy cloths on and had him be even more. Plus the scale is accurate with me. A size 50 jeans he wears so you can bet he's over 300lbs at 6'0. I may have to post more pics. Guessing weight can be fun though.
Believe what you want, but in person no way would you guess 280lbs for a 325lber. The scale was off that time because the max weight was 330lbs and he had heavy cloths on and had him be even more. Plus the scale is accurate with me. A size 50 jeans he wears so you can bet he's over 300lbs at 6'0. I may have to post more pics. Guessing weight can be fun though.
Jason said on 3/May/07
I still don't believe your two friends weigh that much, I'd have to see them weigh in on a reliable pair of scales with my own eyes! ;) (or in person if those pics are that deceiving) When you get really heavy, scales can screw up and be off. You said your scales said error the first time one of them hopped on them, so dunno mate...
I still don't believe your two friends weigh that much, I'd have to see them weigh in on a reliable pair of scales with my own eyes! ;) (or in person if those pics are that deceiving) When you get really heavy, scales can screw up and be off. You said your scales said error the first time one of them hopped on them, so dunno mate...
Alex said on 2/May/07
Maybe but actually tight cloths make people look bigger but if you're fat its the big cloths that do it then. Because when I wear bigger cloths I tend to look leaner but with tighter stuff I look more buffed. I tend to compare other fat guys to 2 of my heavy friends sometimes. Jason you were off with their weights by more than a little but pictures can be decieving so I understood. In person is the only best way to estimate with especially weight.
Maybe but actually tight cloths make people look bigger but if you're fat its the big cloths that do it then. Because when I wear bigger cloths I tend to look leaner but with tighter stuff I look more buffed. I tend to compare other fat guys to 2 of my heavy friends sometimes. Jason you were off with their weights by more than a little but pictures can be decieving so I understood. In person is the only best way to estimate with especially weight.
Jason said on 2/May/07
I guessed 320 before Vegas gave us his estimate. I'm inclined to go lower now since Vegas said 320 tops. Maybe it's the big clothes... lol
I guessed 320 before Vegas gave us his estimate. I'm inclined to go lower now since Vegas said 320 tops. Maybe it's the big clothes... lol
Alex said on 1/May/07
That picture of Cena and Angle looks about the same as with me and Angle or a a bit smaller if you take into account Angle is leaning a bit with me.
Vegas, you actually look 6'0 with that 5'9 guy you posted below.
Rosey only 320lbs? Umm looked more at least around 350lbs to me in person.
That picture of Cena and Angle looks about the same as with me and Angle or a a bit smaller if you take into account Angle is leaning a bit with me.
Vegas, you actually look 6'0 with that 5'9 guy you posted below.
Rosey only 320lbs? Umm looked more at least around 350lbs to me in person.
Viper said on 26/Apr/07
I have to agree with Vegas here. Pen is AT LEAST 6-5 bare minimum.
I have to agree with Vegas here. Pen is AT LEAST 6-5 bare minimum.
Jason said on 26/Apr/07
Vegas, so it was a troll ... f*uck lol. This ''Vegas'' not only claimed to be 6'0'' but also accused me more than once of used to having said I was 6'1'' lol. Far out. I'm sorry about this mate ... that's the reason I didn't always take your word for some things. I hadn't the faintest idea it wasn't you all this time. Was definitely a troll and not someone with the same nick because he made out he was you.
Vegas, so it was a troll ... f*uck lol. This ''Vegas'' not only claimed to be 6'0'' but also accused me more than once of used to having said I was 6'1'' lol. Far out. I'm sorry about this mate ... that's the reason I didn't always take your word for some things. I hadn't the faintest idea it wasn't you all this time. Was definitely a troll and not someone with the same nick because he made out he was you.
Jason said on 26/Apr/07
Dunken: The top of Sapp's head comes up to between Choi's mouth and nose(they're both bent). There could very well be 8 inches between them. I would peg Sapp at 190cm/6'2 3/4''.
Dunken: The top of Sapp's head comes up to between Choi's mouth and nose(they're both bent). There could very well be 8 inches between them. I would peg Sapp at 190cm/6'2 3/4''.
Dunken said on 26/Apr/07
Jason:
Bob Sapp is 6'3 or 6'4 and Choi has alot more then just 5 or 6 inches over him:
Click Here
Sapp looks like a child there and you can be sure Choi's head is more than just 9 inches ;)
Jason:
Bob Sapp is 6'3 or 6'4 and Choi has alot more then just 5 or 6 inches over him:
Click Here
Sapp looks like a child there and you can be sure Choi's head is more than just 9 inches ;)
Jason said on 25/Apr/07
Hong-Man Choi looks no more than the 6'10''-6'11'' I've always said in those pics with Lesnar.
Click Here
That French MMA site has Choi at 211cm (6'11'' exactly) -- one of the middle paragraphs.
Hong-Man Choi looks no more than the 6'10''-6'11'' I've always said in those pics with Lesnar.
Click Here
That French MMA site has Choi at 211cm (6'11'' exactly) -- one of the middle paragraphs.
Jason said on 25/Apr/07
Hong-Man Choi looks no more than the 6'10''-6'11'' I've always said in those pics with Lesnar.
Hong-Man Choi looks no more than the 6'10''-6'11'' I've always said in those pics with Lesnar.
Jason said on 25/Apr/07
Has your brother posted here under the name Vegas? I would have forgot this, but I'm sure on this one. Incidentally, you've claimed I said I was 6'1'' on here (or at least the other Vegas did) when I'm as adamant as you that I said no such thing. I have, however, said stuff like ''when I was 6'1'''', talking about my growth pattern or height/weight at a particular age, etc. What you would have mistaken it for (unless it was another ''Jason''); we all make mistakes...
You know, I've never disputed you have vastly superior proof to whatever I can bring to the table for now. I've even told you that before, so there's no issue there. But that doesn't mean I don't have the right to dispute something you say. I agree with you on some heights, but others I don't.
Regarding some other things: Rosey isn't more than 1.5'' shorter than Jamal -- that would make Jamal/Umaga 6'1 1/2'', which sounds right to me. I've never seen Storm in person (shouldn't you have remembered this? ;)) and so wasn't basing my estimate on this. Also, I said about; roughly, you missed the ~. I also just got done saying 5'10 3/4'' for Flair, not under 5'10 1/2''...
And I actually didn't even know who Penn and Teller were before now. Never seen their shows on TV here.
Has your brother posted here under the name Vegas? I would have forgot this, but I'm sure on this one. Incidentally, you've claimed I said I was 6'1'' on here (or at least the other Vegas did) when I'm as adamant as you that I said no such thing. I have, however, said stuff like ''when I was 6'1'''', talking about my growth pattern or height/weight at a particular age, etc. What you would have mistaken it for (unless it was another ''Jason''); we all make mistakes...
You know, I've never disputed you have vastly superior proof to whatever I can bring to the table for now. I've even told you that before, so there's no issue there. But that doesn't mean I don't have the right to dispute something you say. I agree with you on some heights, but others I don't.
Regarding some other things: Rosey isn't more than 1.5'' shorter than Jamal -- that would make Jamal/Umaga 6'1 1/2'', which sounds right to me. I've never seen Storm in person (shouldn't you have remembered this? ;)) and so wasn't basing my estimate on this. Also, I said about; roughly, you missed the ~. I also just got done saying 5'10 3/4'' for Flair, not under 5'10 1/2''...
And I actually didn't even know who Penn and Teller were before now. Never seen their shows on TV here.
6'3'' JK said on 25/Apr/07
Randy Orton is the most LEGIT looking 6'4'' guy ive ever seen, maybe even 6'5'' as he claims
Randy Orton is the most LEGIT looking 6'4'' guy ive ever seen, maybe even 6'5'' as he claims
Vegas said on 25/Apr/07
here is Penn Jillette towering over David Letterman in 1989 (making Letterman about 42 or peak height in this clip) Click Here letterman claims he is 6'2 hmmm looks 5-9-5'10 max if Jillette is under 6'4 like you said Jason
BTW Jason i cannot believe you don't know Penn and Teller; these guys rock, their current show on tv is great. Really down to earth guys in person too.
here is Penn Jillette towering over David Letterman in 1989 (making Letterman about 42 or peak height in this clip) Click Here letterman claims he is 6'2 hmmm looks 5-9-5'10 max if Jillette is under 6'4 like you said Jason
BTW Jason i cannot believe you don't know Penn and Teller; these guys rock, their current show on tv is great. Really down to earth guys in person too.
Halb said on 25/Apr/07
WWE may bill Randy at his legit height. It happens. If you go to Lance Storm's page he discusses it in an interview.
WWE may bill Randy at his legit height. It happens. If you go to Lance Storm's page he discusses it in an interview.
Viper said on 25/Apr/07
"If this weren't suspicious enough we see his supposedly solid 6'4'' friend looking not even 6'3'' with John Cena, shorter than Randy Orton, and a hair below Rosey ... who most here would agree is 6'3''."
Agreed. Initially after seeing that I questioned his friends height of 6-4, though he really did look 6-4 with Kane, who I peg at 6-7. But seeing Cena taller than ever before with him is still puzzling. Also the fact that WWE bills Randy Orton at his supposesly real height of 6-4 is EXTREMELY slim. I think 6-3 1/4 for Randy is more realistic.
"If this weren't suspicious enough we see his supposedly solid 6'4'' friend looking not even 6'3'' with John Cena, shorter than Randy Orton, and a hair below Rosey ... who most here would agree is 6'3''."
Agreed. Initially after seeing that I questioned his friends height of 6-4, though he really did look 6-4 with Kane, who I peg at 6-7. But seeing Cena taller than ever before with him is still puzzling. Also the fact that WWE bills Randy Orton at his supposesly real height of 6-4 is EXTREMELY slim. I think 6-3 1/4 for Randy is more realistic.
Jason said on 25/Apr/07
I was wrong about Ron Simmons but I'm sticking to my guns about your height claims. I remember our exchange last year about his height well. In fact, I invite Rob to please do check this out if it's possible.
You haven't explained the discrepancies in the pictures I mentioned BTW. Those pictures don't prove anything. Penn Jilette would be almost 6'4'' if you're closer to 5'10'' than 11''. And Ray Teller? I was expecting an athlete who's height could be verified and I get some old fella who looks like a librarian? Please...
I was wrong about Ron Simmons but I'm sticking to my guns about your height claims. I remember our exchange last year about his height well. In fact, I invite Rob to please do check this out if it's possible.
You haven't explained the discrepancies in the pictures I mentioned BTW. Those pictures don't prove anything. Penn Jilette would be almost 6'4'' if you're closer to 5'10'' than 11''. And Ray Teller? I was expecting an athlete who's height could be verified and I get some old fella who looks like a librarian? Please...
Vegas said on 25/Apr/07
6'3'' JK as if Viper is ever going to believe you, to him we are all just stupid idiots, overestimating everyone we see. Viper had Kevin Federline at 5'11 in January 2006 and then brought him down to 5'8-5'9 as soon as he saw that Cena had close to 4" on him.
Jason you have never met a wrestler in person on an equal footing so stop talking crap from behind your computer screen because nobody only your good buddy Viper believes anything you say. You give us nothing here but estimations from high in the stands. I was ringside 1st row ring for Royal Rumble in January and saw all of the wrestlers coming to the ring; am I stupid enough to estimate them from where i was: NO.
Jason; "big Show is def just 6'7", "oh no wait maybe he was 6'8, it could have been 6'9 though", who is honestly going to believe this???
Jason couple of points:
it wasn't a "compare yourself to the wrestlers" novelty chart; it was located in the United Center in Chicago, Home of the Chicago Bulls and it was the entire wall, costing probably a couple of grand to build.
And my friend was 1" shy of the 6'6 mark in shoes, man do you remember anything rite at all (i said i was 6'0 WRONG, Ron Simmons was listed at 6'0 in Florida State WRONG, a wrestlers novelty chart, WRONG). Seriously if you get simple stuff like that wrong.
Here is me and 6'6 listed Penn Jillette (who said he was 6'6 twice during the show) Click Here
Here is me and 5'9 listed Ray Teller Click Here
lets quickly downgrade those guys now to 6'2 and 5'5 respectively oh but wait
6'4 Bob Saget and Penn Jillette Click Here and Click Here
Guys you two have continually bullied your way through this website; long before I arrived. You offer little except giving the absolute lowest estimation on here. You listen to nothing anyone has to say and leave in a huff when proved wrong. You continually demand that Rob downgrades celebrities on here based on a single photo or someone leaning in photos etc. I know Viper is the ring leader (because Jasons early estimations fall in line with Vipers eventually); but the head bully without his accomplice for 6-8 months was struggling badly there. Hey guys eventually you will downgrade everyone enough so that the two of you will be the tallest guys left in the world, i am sure that is your intention isn't it???
6'3'' JK as if Viper is ever going to believe you, to him we are all just stupid idiots, overestimating everyone we see. Viper had Kevin Federline at 5'11 in January 2006 and then brought him down to 5'8-5'9 as soon as he saw that Cena had close to 4" on him.
Jason you have never met a wrestler in person on an equal footing so stop talking crap from behind your computer screen because nobody only your good buddy Viper believes anything you say. You give us nothing here but estimations from high in the stands. I was ringside 1st row ring for Royal Rumble in January and saw all of the wrestlers coming to the ring; am I stupid enough to estimate them from where i was: NO.
Jason; "big Show is def just 6'7", "oh no wait maybe he was 6'8, it could have been 6'9 though", who is honestly going to believe this???
Jason couple of points:
it wasn't a "compare yourself to the wrestlers" novelty chart; it was located in the United Center in Chicago, Home of the Chicago Bulls and it was the entire wall, costing probably a couple of grand to build.
And my friend was 1" shy of the 6'6 mark in shoes, man do you remember anything rite at all (i said i was 6'0 WRONG, Ron Simmons was listed at 6'0 in Florida State WRONG, a wrestlers novelty chart, WRONG). Seriously if you get simple stuff like that wrong.
Here is me and 6'6 listed Penn Jillette (who said he was 6'6 twice during the show) Click Here
Here is me and 5'9 listed Ray Teller Click Here
lets quickly downgrade those guys now to 6'2 and 5'5 respectively oh but wait
6'4 Bob Saget and Penn Jillette Click Here and Click Here
Guys you two have continually bullied your way through this website; long before I arrived. You offer little except giving the absolute lowest estimation on here. You listen to nothing anyone has to say and leave in a huff when proved wrong. You continually demand that Rob downgrades celebrities on here based on a single photo or someone leaning in photos etc. I know Viper is the ring leader (because Jasons early estimations fall in line with Vipers eventually); but the head bully without his accomplice for 6-8 months was struggling badly there. Hey guys eventually you will downgrade everyone enough so that the two of you will be the tallest guys left in the world, i am sure that is your intention isn't it???
Jason said on 25/Apr/07
In addition to the Ron Simmons issue, he also said Flair is 5'11 1/2'' because Flair was half an inch taller than him. Flair was certainly no 5'11 1/2'' when I saw him (I've seen him in ring gear and dress clothes) ... 5'10 3/4''ish most likely. And I think ~ 5'10 1/2'' Lance Storm looked at least as tall or even pipped him by a titch? If this weren't suspicious enough we see his supposedly solid 6'4'' friend looking not even 6'3'' with John Cena, shorter than Randy Orton, and a hair below Rosey ... who most here would agree is 6'3''. I can only conclude Vegas is closer to 5'10'' and his friend doesn't quite touch the 6'3'' mark (you'll need more than standing in front of a ''compare yourself to the wrestlers'' novelty chart in shoes to convince me otherwise). Yet we're the ones who are full of it? Ooops - I forgot -since he's the one with the pics it makes him correct by default. Gimme a break. Normally I wouldn't be this blunt, but if he wants to attack people like he has been I'll at least be honest...
In addition to the Ron Simmons issue, he also said Flair is 5'11 1/2'' because Flair was half an inch taller than him. Flair was certainly no 5'11 1/2'' when I saw him (I've seen him in ring gear and dress clothes) ... 5'10 3/4''ish most likely. And I think ~ 5'10 1/2'' Lance Storm looked at least as tall or even pipped him by a titch? If this weren't suspicious enough we see his supposedly solid 6'4'' friend looking not even 6'3'' with John Cena, shorter than Randy Orton, and a hair below Rosey ... who most here would agree is 6'3''. I can only conclude Vegas is closer to 5'10'' and his friend doesn't quite touch the 6'3'' mark (you'll need more than standing in front of a ''compare yourself to the wrestlers'' novelty chart in shoes to convince me otherwise). Yet we're the ones who are full of it? Ooops - I forgot -since he's the one with the pics it makes him correct by default. Gimme a break. Normally I wouldn't be this blunt, but if he wants to attack people like he has been I'll at least be honest...
Viper said on 25/Apr/07
Jason, on Rock's page Vegas had the gall to say I was referencing old college heights when I mentioned some NFL guys that I know who have been padded by an inch. Or even 2.
Jason, on Rock's page Vegas had the gall to say I was referencing old college heights when I mentioned some NFL guys that I know who have been padded by an inch. Or even 2.
Jason said on 24/Apr/07
Viper says on 24/Apr/07
''Jason, this guy refuses to beleive that some NFL heights are padded by more than a half an inch.''
Surely they'd never do that?
:)
Viper says on 24/Apr/07
''Jason, this guy refuses to beleive that some NFL heights are padded by more than a half an inch.''
Surely they'd never do that?
:)
6'3'' JK said on 24/Apr/07
He was a full 6'2'' TRUST ME, this is no joke, he had 4 inches on me, top of my head couldent reach his eybrow level and i was a legit 178 - 179cm
He was a full 6'2'' TRUST ME, this is no joke, he had 4 inches on me, top of my head couldent reach his eybrow level and i was a legit 178 - 179cm
Viper said on 24/Apr/07
6-1 1/2 in sneakers I can beleive, but not a full 6-2.
6-1 1/2 in sneakers I can beleive, but not a full 6-2.
6'3'' JK said on 24/Apr/07
Viper, I am not trying to argue but Vegas is absolutley right! Cena is 6'2'' with sneakers, i have been saying that for almost a year now, Although i may be taller than Cena now I met him in 2004 when i was 5'10'' and he easily had 4 inches on me, He is a Tall dude
Viper, I am not trying to argue but Vegas is absolutley right! Cena is 6'2'' with sneakers, i have been saying that for almost a year now, Although i may be taller than Cena now I met him in 2004 when i was 5'10'' and he easily had 4 inches on me, He is a Tall dude
Viper said on 24/Apr/07
Jason, this guy refuses to beleive that some NFL heights are padded by more than a half an inch.
Jason, this guy refuses to beleive that some NFL heights are padded by more than a half an inch.
Jason said on 24/Apr/07
I'm not calling you a liar, I just don't agree with you (and I guess you really musta forgotten saying 6'0''...). Meet you in person for what? Dude, we're discussing the real heights of wrestlers on an internet message board. Calm down...
''These people stop growing in height early due to elevated testosterone levels - as early as 11-12 years old.''
BTW, where does that say I said *Ron Simmons* stopped growing at 11-12? ;)
I'm not calling you a liar, I just don't agree with you (and I guess you really musta forgotten saying 6'0''...). Meet you in person for what? Dude, we're discussing the real heights of wrestlers on an internet message board. Calm down...
''These people stop growing in height early due to elevated testosterone levels - as early as 11-12 years old.''
BTW, where does that say I said *Ron Simmons* stopped growing at 11-12? ;)
Vegas said on 24/Apr/07
Viper says on 24/Apr/07
Cena 6-2 is basketball shoes? Vegas, now you are just making up stuff. The most the man could be is 6-1 1/2 at best in basketball shoes
Yet Cena is 3" taller than Kurt Angle (5'10 barefoot, 5'11+ in wrestling boots) in basketball boots Click Here and Click Here
Viper all of this height stuff is a bit out of your league it seems to me :D
Viper says on 24/Apr/07
Cena 6-2 is basketball shoes? Vegas, now you are just making up stuff. The most the man could be is 6-1 1/2 at best in basketball shoes
Yet Cena is 3" taller than Kurt Angle (5'10 barefoot, 5'11+ in wrestling boots) in basketball boots Click Here and Click Here
Viper all of this height stuff is a bit out of your league it seems to me :D
Vegas said on 24/Apr/07
FOR THE FINAL TIME JASON I NEVER SAID I WAS 6'0 AT ANY TIME ON THIS SITE. Rob will confirm this for you.
Jason you say you have met all these wrestlers in person but yet you post no pictures or you double back when I or someone else questions you. I challenge either you or Viper to meet me and my friend in person because you guys continually post crap on here or have called me a liar since day one.
Max Starks is listed at 6'7 by the NFL Viper not 6'8 Click Here and Ron Simmons WAS listed at 6'1 at Florida State Click Here For the last two years of his stay in Florida State Deion Sanders was listed at 6'0 and yet he was listed at 6'1 in the NFL.
Saying that Simmons stopped growing at 11-12 years is the biggest crock of **** i have ever read here since you claimed Big Show was 6'7 and matt morgan was 6'5 prompting me to first post on this site. At least the people claiming that Andre was 7 foot+ and that 6'6 in his prime have a basis for their arguments seeing as I never met either of these guys in person and nobody will ever know the real truth about those two now.
But when you say the guys I met in person are not close to the heights I claim, then you run the risk of looking foolish as you have a few times I must admit. Like Glenn says you have to meet these people face to face, otherwise put up or shut up.
Editor Rob
FOR THE FINAL TIME JASON I NEVER SAID I WAS 6'0 AT ANY TIME ON THIS SITE. Rob will confirm this for you.
Jason you say you have met all these wrestlers in person but yet you post no pictures or you double back when I or someone else questions you. I challenge either you or Viper to meet me and my friend in person because you guys continually post crap on here or have called me a liar since day one.
Max Starks is listed at 6'7 by the NFL Viper not 6'8 Click Here and Ron Simmons WAS listed at 6'1 at Florida State Click Here For the last two years of his stay in Florida State Deion Sanders was listed at 6'0 and yet he was listed at 6'1 in the NFL.
Saying that Simmons stopped growing at 11-12 years is the biggest crock of **** i have ever read here since you claimed Big Show was 6'7 and matt morgan was 6'5 prompting me to first post on this site. At least the people claiming that Andre was 7 foot+ and that 6'6 in his prime have a basis for their arguments seeing as I never met either of these guys in person and nobody will ever know the real truth about those two now.
But when you say the guys I met in person are not close to the heights I claim, then you run the risk of looking foolish as you have a few times I must admit. Like Glenn says you have to meet these people face to face, otherwise put up or shut up.
Editor Rob to be fair, Vegas has earned some respect since he has posted photos of him and buddies with some wrestlers and beside a height chart.
Viper said on 24/Apr/07
Oh man, Simmons was listed at 6-0 in college? Hell, even the Mexican Mentor guy has him at 6-0. So Jason, who should we beleive? Thats 2 sources with him at 6-0.
Oh man, Simmons was listed at 6-0 in college? Hell, even the Mexican Mentor guy has him at 6-0. So Jason, who should we beleive? Thats 2 sources with him at 6-0.
Viper said on 24/Apr/07
Yeah Jason, Starks is a flat 6-7, billed at 6-8 yet Vegas here says they can only be a half an inch off. Like I said my favorite player in the NFL is padded by 2 inches.
Yeah Jason, Starks is a flat 6-7, billed at 6-8 yet Vegas here says they can only be a half an inch off. Like I said my favorite player in the NFL is padded by 2 inches.
Viper said on 24/Apr/07
Cena 6-2 is basketball shoes? Vegas, now you are just making up stuff. The most the man could be is 6-1 1/2 at best in basketball shoes.
Cena 6-2 is basketball shoes? Vegas, now you are just making up stuff. The most the man could be is 6-1 1/2 at best in basketball shoes.
Jason said on 23/Apr/07
No mate, you said you were 6'0''. You didn't start saying 5'11'' until after you posted that height chart pic. Simmons *could* have gained 0.25''-0.5'' after that listing ... that listing *could* also be rounded up 0.25''-0.5''. All that's certain is he was listed as a flat 6'0''. Actually, to be frank it's unlikely Simmons gained anything in height at that age. Triple H said in his book Simmons rarely lifts weights (like once in a blue moon), meaning he's what's called an extreme mesomorph in medical terms (someone with a naturally large amount of muscle mass, very large bone structure, etc.). These people stop growing in height early due to elevated testosterone levels - as early as 11-12 years old.
No mate, you said you were 6'0''. You didn't start saying 5'11'' until after you posted that height chart pic. Simmons *could* have gained 0.25''-0.5'' after that listing ... that listing *could* also be rounded up 0.25''-0.5''. All that's certain is he was listed as a flat 6'0''. Actually, to be frank it's unlikely Simmons gained anything in height at that age. Triple H said in his book Simmons rarely lifts weights (like once in a blue moon), meaning he's what's called an extreme mesomorph in medical terms (someone with a naturally large amount of muscle mass, very large bone structure, etc.). These people stop growing in height early due to elevated testosterone levels - as early as 11-12 years old.
Viper said on 23/Apr/07
Vegas inflates everybody by an inch it seems Jason.
Vegas inflates everybody by an inch it seems Jason.
Vegas said on 23/Apr/07
Simmons was listed at 6'1 in college football, you linked the website yourself jason and said something along the lines of "this proves simmons was not more than 6ft because all college football listings are padded".
Simmons was only 17 or 18 years old when he started playing football for Florida state so he could easily have gained 0.25-0.5" on that early listing. I am 100% sure that Simmons was no shorter than 6'1 in 2004 when i met him; and I was standing beside him for about 15 minutes. the photo of me, my brother and my friend next to Simmons further backs up my 6'1+ sighting.
Jason i never said i was 6'0, i posted the height chart photo of myself and it shows me at exactly 6'0 in shoes. But those 2 errors (my height and simmons' listing) prove you remember things the way you want to remember them and now makes me question all of your estimations.
Simmons was listed at 6'1 in college football, you linked the website yourself jason and said something along the lines of "this proves simmons was not more than 6ft because all college football listings are padded".
Simmons was only 17 or 18 years old when he started playing football for Florida state so he could easily have gained 0.25-0.5" on that early listing. I am 100% sure that Simmons was no shorter than 6'1 in 2004 when i met him; and I was standing beside him for about 15 minutes. the photo of me, my brother and my friend next to Simmons further backs up my 6'1+ sighting.
Jason i never said i was 6'0, i posted the height chart photo of myself and it shows me at exactly 6'0 in shoes. But those 2 errors (my height and simmons' listing) prove you remember things the way you want to remember them and now makes me question all of your estimations.
Jason said on 23/Apr/07
I said he wasn't over 6'0'' and I'm 100% positive you used to claim you were 6'0''. I knew you weren't when you insisted Ron Simmons was 6'1 1/2'' or 6'2'', though. He was listed as 6-0 in college football ... what's wrong with that listing? ;)
I said he wasn't over 6'0'' and I'm 100% positive you used to claim you were 6'0''. I knew you weren't when you insisted Ron Simmons was 6'1 1/2'' or 6'2'', though. He was listed as 6-0 in college football ... what's wrong with that listing? ;)
Vegas said on 23/Apr/07
Yes i said Simmons was 6'1-6'1.5" as he had 2-2.5" on me. I never once said i was 6'0 on here, i am 5'11. The picture of me, him, my 5'11.75-6ft brother is as clear as day. I have never changed my opinion of Simmons, it was you who suggested he was 5'11'-6'0 max :)
i never give an exact estimate because nobody is that good, there is no way you can say a guy is a certain height to the exact centimetre without a measuring tape on hand. 187cm could very well be 188cm. There are loads of 6'8 listings for Starks on the net btw.
Hogan and Lesnar Click Here both are standing straight, Lesnar is not arching himself up and Hogan is just one inch taller than lesnar in 2002.
Yes i said Simmons was 6'1-6'1.5" as he had 2-2.5" on me. I never once said i was 6'0 on here, i am 5'11. The picture of me, him, my 5'11.75-6ft brother is as clear as day. I have never changed my opinion of Simmons, it was you who suggested he was 5'11'-6'0 max :)
i never give an exact estimate because nobody is that good, there is no way you can say a guy is a certain height to the exact centimetre without a measuring tape on hand. 187cm could very well be 188cm. There are loads of 6'8 listings for Starks on the net btw.
Hogan and Lesnar Click Here both are standing straight, Lesnar is not arching himself up and Hogan is just one inch taller than lesnar in 2002.
Jason said on 22/Apr/07
Hogan was more than 1 flat inch taller than Lesnar. If you watch that match (I have it on DVD on that Brock Lesnar one ''Here's Comes the Pain''?) Lesnar is deliberately arching himself up and making himself as tall as possible while Hogan's posture is average at best.
Hogan was more than 1 flat inch taller than Lesnar. If you watch that match (I have it on DVD on that Brock Lesnar one ''Here's Comes the Pain''?) Lesnar is deliberately arching himself up and making himself as tall as possible while Hogan's posture is average at best.
Jason said on 22/Apr/07
About Max Starx, I've only seen 6-7 and 6-7.1 measured heights for him.
About Max Starx, I've only seen 6-7 and 6-7.1 measured heights for him.
Jason said on 22/Apr/07
Vegas, I said 6'1'' and change ... that means 187 or 186cm (6'1 1/2'' or 6'1 1/4''). 6'1 1/2'' is still my estimate, but he could be just a flat 6'1'' as I did see him in ring gear.
I swap and change? Weren't you the one who said Farooq was 6'1 1/2'' because you're 6'0'' and he had 1 1/2 inches on ya? ;)
Vegas, I said 6'1'' and change ... that means 187 or 186cm (6'1 1/2'' or 6'1 1/4''). 6'1 1/2'' is still my estimate, but he could be just a flat 6'1'' as I did see him in ring gear.
I swap and change? Weren't you the one who said Farooq was 6'1 1/2'' because you're 6'0'' and he had 1 1/2 inches on ya? ;)
Vegas said on 22/Apr/07
Cena is 6'2 in basketball boots even you admitted that was possible. I have stood side by side with Cena and he was 6'2 in basketball boots so 6'2 + 1" = 6'3 Brock Lesnar in boots minus ~1" for Lesnars boots and we are back to ~6'2 barefoot for Brock Lesnar again; simple really.
A few select guys are padded?? If one NFL height is out then we can question them all. This isn't wrestling Viper, NFL don't need to make guys bigger so the fans will cheer them more.
And again i go back to Hogan; Do you believe Hogan was just 6'2 in 2002 because he was just 1" taller than Lesnar???
Cena is 6'2 in basketball boots even you admitted that was possible. I have stood side by side with Cena and he was 6'2 in basketball boots so 6'2 + 1" = 6'3 Brock Lesnar in boots minus ~1" for Lesnars boots and we are back to ~6'2 barefoot for Brock Lesnar again; simple really.
A few select guys are padded?? If one NFL height is out then we can question them all. This isn't wrestling Viper, NFL don't need to make guys bigger so the fans will cheer them more.
And again i go back to Hogan; Do you believe Hogan was just 6'2 in 2002 because he was just 1" taller than Lesnar???
Viper said on 22/Apr/07
Well, for starters Lesnar looks just an inch above Cena's height. Go look over on the Cena page Vegas. You have a computer, use it. No Vegas, for a few select guys in the NFL there is a one inch pad, even 2 on very rare occasions.
Well, for starters Lesnar looks just an inch above Cena's height. Go look over on the Cena page Vegas. You have a computer, use it. No Vegas, for a few select guys in the NFL there is a one inch pad, even 2 on very rare occasions.
Viper said on 21/Apr/07
"Danimal is 100% correct on Lesnar's height. He was 6'1'' and change."
Come on Jason, give some credit where credit is due here :) Ive been saying Lesnar is 6-1 since 2005. And Goldberg is the same height as well. Triple H too.
"Danimal is 100% correct on Lesnar's height. He was 6'1'' and change."
Come on Jason, give some credit where credit is due here :) Ive been saying Lesnar is 6-1 since 2005. And Goldberg is the same height as well. Triple H too.
Jason said on 20/Apr/07
I found a 211cm listing for Choi on a French MMA site. Danimal is 100% correct on Lesnar's height. He was 6'1'' and change.
I found a 211cm listing for Choi on a French MMA site. Danimal is 100% correct on Lesnar's height. He was 6'1'' and change.
Viper said on 20/Apr/07
6-1 1/4 is what he was probably measured at the combine.
6-1 1/4 is what he was probably measured at the combine.
tomcat said on 19/Apr/07
Brock Lesnar is a little less than 6'3". He was measured and weighed at the NFL combine. Ever see how they test draft picks and potential football players? Well, I do. Nothing is left to chance. The potential draftee(player) is weighed and measured in front of the prospective teams, coaches, etc. by someone else, while they are standing there in their boxers. Nothing is left to chance. He's just under 6'3" barefoot, flat against a wall, head properly placed, while one of the NFL combine staff measures and weighs him. That's it, done deal. No wavering, no maybe he's taller or shorter, that's his height.Bottom line.
Brock Lesnar is a little less than 6'3". He was measured and weighed at the NFL combine. Ever see how they test draft picks and potential football players? Well, I do. Nothing is left to chance. The potential draftee(player) is weighed and measured in front of the prospective teams, coaches, etc. by someone else, while they are standing there in their boxers. Nothing is left to chance. He's just under 6'3" barefoot, flat against a wall, head properly placed, while one of the NFL combine staff measures and weighs him. That's it, done deal. No wavering, no maybe he's taller or shorter, that's his height.Bottom line.
6'2.5'' JK said on 6/Apr/07
I think Lesnar is actually 6'2'' flat and nothing over it
I think Lesnar is actually 6'2'' flat and nothing over it
Danimal said on 5/Apr/07
At most, I give Brock 6'1.5".
Dorris, he lied.
At most, I give Brock 6'1.5".
Dorris, he lied.
Viper said on 5/Apr/07
Brock is 6-3 1/2 standing on his tippy toes in boots, lol.
Brock is 6-3 1/2 standing on his tippy toes in boots, lol.
dorris said on 5/Apr/07
hold up hold up 1 min i got the whole truth ryt here
i went to an autograph session where brock lesnar was signing autographs
i myesself asked him how tall are you he replied "exactly 6'3 and a half" i wasnt surprised at all so there is your truth.
hold up hold up 1 min i got the whole truth ryt here
i went to an autograph session where brock lesnar was signing autographs
i myesself asked him how tall are you he replied "exactly 6'3 and a half" i wasnt surprised at all so there is your truth.
Viper said on 5/Apr/07
I know what you mean immoral. They screw up on serveral players in their first or 2nd year. One example I can think of is the Panthers Keary Colbert being listed at only 5-10 his rookie year, when he's actually over 6-0, close to 6-1. They now have him listed at 6-1. Thats the craziest one Ive seen. But they are still more accurate than baseball and basketball by a longshot. With all that being said, Lesnar is probably 6-1 1/4 on a good day.
I know what you mean immoral. They screw up on serveral players in their first or 2nd year. One example I can think of is the Panthers Keary Colbert being listed at only 5-10 his rookie year, when he's actually over 6-0, close to 6-1. They now have him listed at 6-1. Thats the craziest one Ive seen. But they are still more accurate than baseball and basketball by a longshot. With all that being said, Lesnar is probably 6-1 1/4 on a good day.
immoral_animal said on 4/Apr/07
The NFL is hardly an unimpeachable authority on biometrics, not even by a long-shot. They routinely post exagerated heights for all sorts of players, and intentionally reduce posted weights for obese O- and D-linemen.
They sometimes post oddly low-ball heights for some players, though. Marc Boerigter (used to be a CFl star, so I followed his moves in the NFL) was always listed as 6'3", even though the guy was clearly 6'4". I read an interview one time where he was puzzled at being listed 6'3" in all "official" NFL media. They used to list Drew Brees as under 6'. I remember Coy Wire of the Bills at one point was listed as, like 5'10". Now he's 6'. Their measures are all over the place, much like their piss-poor, inaccurate 40-yard times (CBs running 4.2 seconds, my ass.)
Lesnar's prolly between 6'1.5" to 6'2.5"...
The NFL is hardly an unimpeachable authority on biometrics, not even by a long-shot. They routinely post exagerated heights for all sorts of players, and intentionally reduce posted weights for obese O- and D-linemen.
They sometimes post oddly low-ball heights for some players, though. Marc Boerigter (used to be a CFl star, so I followed his moves in the NFL) was always listed as 6'3", even though the guy was clearly 6'4". I read an interview one time where he was puzzled at being listed 6'3" in all "official" NFL media. They used to list Drew Brees as under 6'. I remember Coy Wire of the Bills at one point was listed as, like 5'10". Now he's 6'. Their measures are all over the place, much like their piss-poor, inaccurate 40-yard times (CBs running 4.2 seconds, my ass.)
Lesnar's prolly between 6'1.5" to 6'2.5"...
Vegas said on 3/Apr/07
Great photos JT. Choi is a legit 7'2. According to Wolverinejoe90; Choi has been measured barefoot on korean tv. Interesting Lesnar looks so tall. We will have to wait until June to see the barefoot face-off. I have a big bet on this fight (first round win), cmon Hong-Man Choi :)
Great photos JT. Choi is a legit 7'2. According to Wolverinejoe90; Choi has been measured barefoot on korean tv. Interesting Lesnar looks so tall. We will have to wait until June to see the barefoot face-off. I have a big bet on this fight (first round win), cmon Hong-Man Choi :)
JT said on 2/Apr/07
Lesnar and 7’2” (I think) Choi, though I don’t follow this sport (Click Here) (Click Here) (Click Here) (Click Here) (Click Here) The 6’2” Lesnar is looking at least 6’5”, so it’s probably the photo angles, Lesnar wearing lifts, uneven ground, and/or Choi slouching. Akebono towered over Lesnar and a barefoot Choi had a barefoot Akebono (at least 6'7") by at least 5 inches, so Choi should have Lesnar by almost a full head.
Lesnar and 7’2” (I think) Choi, though I don’t follow this sport (Click Here) (Click Here) (Click Here) (Click Here) (Click Here) The 6’2” Lesnar is looking at least 6’5”, so it’s probably the photo angles, Lesnar wearing lifts, uneven ground, and/or Choi slouching. Akebono towered over Lesnar and a barefoot Choi had a barefoot Akebono (at least 6'7") by at least 5 inches, so Choi should have Lesnar by almost a full head.
Dunken said on 2/Apr/07
not the best angle (horrible, to be honest) but here's Brock with 7'2/7'1 Choi, 5'11/5'10 Royce Gracie and former NFL player Jonnie Morton (ESPN tells me he's 6'):
Click Here
not the best angle (horrible, to be honest) but here's Brock with 7'2/7'1 Choi, 5'11/5'10 Royce Gracie and former NFL player Jonnie Morton (ESPN tells me he's 6'):
Click Here
Danimal said on 1/Apr/07
Batista was actually billed at 337 pounds when he made his debut as the Leviathon and fought Kane, when Kane was 345 pounds (in 1999-2000).
Batista was actually billed at 337 pounds when he made his debut as the Leviathon and fought Kane, when Kane was 345 pounds (in 1999-2000).
Vegas said on 1/Apr/07
If Lesnar is barely 6'1 that means Hogan was barely 6'2 in 2002. Sorry Viper I'm not buying that, no way. Hogan is just a smidge shorter than David Hasselhoff as of 2006 about 0.5"-0.75". I, along with 99% of people i suspect will go with the NFL's 6'2 for Brock Lesnar. Some will go with the NCAA's 6'3, i can't see anyone but you Viper and maybe gee going with 6'1 for Lesnar.
If Lesnar is barely 6'1 that means Hogan was barely 6'2 in 2002. Sorry Viper I'm not buying that, no way. Hogan is just a smidge shorter than David Hasselhoff as of 2006 about 0.5"-0.75". I, along with 99% of people i suspect will go with the NFL's 6'2 for Brock Lesnar. Some will go with the NCAA's 6'3, i can't see anyone but you Viper and maybe gee going with 6'1 for Lesnar.
Viper said on 1/Apr/07
Lesnar is barely 6-1.
Lesnar is barely 6-1.
Dunken said on 21/Mar/07
Lesnar is now schedule to fight Korean fighter Hong Man Choi in the summer in the USA.
who is Hong Man Choi? a 7'2 guy (brown jacket, in the middle):
Click Here
look out for the staredown between the 2, USA rule don't allow shoes in MMA matches, so they'll be both barefeet.
Lesnar is now schedule to fight Korean fighter Hong Man Choi in the summer in the USA.
who is Hong Man Choi? a 7'2 guy (brown jacket, in the middle):
Click Here
look out for the staredown between the 2, USA rule don't allow shoes in MMA matches, so they'll be both barefeet.
Vegas said on 20/Mar/07
Nick Patrick when did you measure Lesnar and Goldberg and how come the NFL listed the two of them at 6'2??? This is their true height not 6'3, it couldn't be 6'3 as Rock is taller than both Lesnar and Goldberg and he is 6'3.
Both Lesnar and Goldberg are 6'3 in shoes, no way 6'3 barefoot and Hogan is currently about 6'3 barefoot and has been for quite a while now.
Nick Patrick when did you measure Lesnar and Goldberg and how come the NFL listed the two of them at 6'2??? This is their true height not 6'3, it couldn't be 6'3 as Rock is taller than both Lesnar and Goldberg and he is 6'3.
Both Lesnar and Goldberg are 6'3 in shoes, no way 6'3 barefoot and Hogan is currently about 6'3 barefoot and has been for quite a while now.
Viper said on 16/Mar/07
6-3 in boots and lifts I can beleive.
6-3 in boots and lifts I can beleive.
Nick Patrick said on 15/Mar/07
In actual fact non of these are true. I accuratly measure Goldberg & Brock myself. they are both 6,3. Hogan however due to the fact that he is Very old is approaximatly 6,4.
In actual fact non of these are true. I accuratly measure Goldberg & Brock myself. they are both 6,3. Hogan however due to the fact that he is Very old is approaximatly 6,4.
Danimal said on 3/Mar/07
Goldberg's wrestling gear doesn't say very much, seeing he had the tiniest shoes. NO heel there at all. I doubt Hogan was 6'2" in 2002.
Goldberg's wrestling gear doesn't say very much, seeing he had the tiniest shoes. NO heel there at all. I doubt Hogan was 6'2" in 2002.
Halb said on 3/Mar/07
Goldberg is 2-3 inches taller than that Stevens, something is not right there.
I prolly think Goldberg is aboot 6 ft 2 in. That seems right.
Goldberg is 2-3 inches taller than that Stevens, something is not right there.
I prolly think Goldberg is aboot 6 ft 2 in. That seems right.
Anonymous said on 3/Mar/07
Viper that is a picture taken from the set of a movie and all movie set photos should be dismissed full stop. Did you see the huge boots Platt wore in that movie, they were like platforms.
I see you mention Barkley pic alot when referring to Bill Goldberg; even Jason says that Goldberg is more than likely in barefoot and Barkley in big shoes in that pic, i haven't seen it so I can't say. Here is Goldberg only looking about 2" shorter than a guy I cannot pin down in terms of height Charles Barkley Click Here
Goldberg and 6'3 NHL listed Scott Stevens Click Here
Goldberg had a 6'2 NFL listing Danimal and he looks 6'2, another guy who slouches alot though, so like the Rock its impossible sometimes to gain a true estimate of his height
Hogan is not 6'2 today and certainly wasn't back in 2002 either.
Hogan standing behind Lou Ferrigno Click Here and just in front of Ferrigno Click Here
Hogan and Lennox Lewis Click Here and Click Here
Viper that is a picture taken from the set of a movie and all movie set photos should be dismissed full stop. Did you see the huge boots Platt wore in that movie, they were like platforms.
I see you mention Barkley pic alot when referring to Bill Goldberg; even Jason says that Goldberg is more than likely in barefoot and Barkley in big shoes in that pic, i haven't seen it so I can't say. Here is Goldberg only looking about 2" shorter than a guy I cannot pin down in terms of height Charles Barkley Click Here
Goldberg and 6'3 NHL listed Scott Stevens Click Here
Goldberg had a 6'2 NFL listing Danimal and he looks 6'2, another guy who slouches alot though, so like the Rock its impossible sometimes to gain a true estimate of his height
Hogan is not 6'2 today and certainly wasn't back in 2002 either.
Hogan standing behind Lou Ferrigno Click Here and just in front of Ferrigno Click Here
Hogan and Lennox Lewis Click Here and Click Here
Viper said on 2/Mar/07
6-3 Max Oliver Platt and Goldberg. Goldberg looks to be in the 6-1 range, and hes in wrestling gear no less. Click Here
6-3 Max Oliver Platt and Goldberg. Goldberg looks to be in the 6-1 range, and hes in wrestling gear no less. Click Here
Viper said on 2/Mar/07
Goldberg cant be 6-2 or 6-3. He looked 6-0 next to Charles Barkley in his book.
Goldberg cant be 6-2 or 6-3. He looked 6-0 next to Charles Barkley in his book.
Viper said on 2/Mar/07
Yep, If I had to bet money Id say Hogan is 6-2ish since then. Rock's college height inflated by 2 inches. Goldberg inflated by an inch.
Yep, If I had to bet money Id say Hogan is 6-2ish since then. Rock's college height inflated by 2 inches. Goldberg inflated by an inch.
Danimal said on 2/Mar/07
Goldberg is not 6'1" Viper. That's one guy I just can't agree with you on. Hasn't Goldberg also had a 6'3" College Football, or NFL listing?
Goldberg is not 6'1" Viper. That's one guy I just can't agree with you on. Hasn't Goldberg also had a 6'3" College Football, or NFL listing?
Vegas said on 2/Mar/07
Making Hogan only 6'2 in 2002 with Brock then Viper. Maybe Brock was measured by the NFL at 6'1 flat and rounded up to 6'2????? Same with Goldberg???
Sorry man your estimations just don't add up, Hogan is nearly as tall as 6'5 listed Lennox Lewis as of 2006, nearly as tall as David Hasselholf, as tall as lou ferrigno and the list goes on; these of course are all 5 years after meeting with Brock.
Rock was listed at 6'4 for Miami Hurricanes, Brock at 6'2 for Minnesota Vikings and Goldberg at 6'2 with the Atlanta Falcons. Take an inch off the Rock's college listing and you have the correct heights of each of the three guys.
Making Hogan only 6'2 in 2002 with Brock then Viper. Maybe Brock was measured by the NFL at 6'1 flat and rounded up to 6'2????? Same with Goldberg???
Sorry man your estimations just don't add up, Hogan is nearly as tall as 6'5 listed Lennox Lewis as of 2006, nearly as tall as David Hasselholf, as tall as lou ferrigno and the list goes on; these of course are all 5 years after meeting with Brock.
Rock was listed at 6'4 for Miami Hurricanes, Brock at 6'2 for Minnesota Vikings and Goldberg at 6'2 with the Atlanta Falcons. Take an inch off the Rock's college listing and you have the correct heights of each of the three guys.
Viper said on 1/Mar/07
Ive been saying both Brock and Goldberg are closer to 6-1 for 2 years now.
Ive been saying both Brock and Goldberg are closer to 6-1 for 2 years now.
J-Dog said on 1/Mar/07
Anyone who says the Rock is 6'2" may be insane he is bigger than both Brock and 6'3" Goldberg.
Anyone who says the Rock is 6'2" may be insane he is bigger than both Brock and 6'3" Goldberg.
6'2.5'' JK said on 27/Feb/07
I don't see Lesnar being any smaller than 6'2''
I don't see Lesnar being any smaller than 6'2''
Viper said on 26/Feb/07
Hogan looked taller facing the Rock then he does with Lesnar. I just dont see any real height difference.
Hogan looked taller facing the Rock then he does with Lesnar. I just dont see any real height difference.
Vegas said on 26/Feb/07
6'2.5'' JK and Viper what pictures are you guys looking at??? Hogan is clearly taller there by at least an inch Click Here
Hogan's knees are nearly gone at this stage in 2002 i will agree Danimal.
I will post more full-length photos of this match when I get my DVD sofware working properly
6'2.5'' JK and Viper what pictures are you guys looking at??? Hogan is clearly taller there by at least an inch Click Here
Hogan's knees are nearly gone at this stage in 2002 i will agree Danimal.
I will post more full-length photos of this match when I get my DVD sofware working properly
Danimal said on 26/Feb/07
The top of Hogan's head is higher than Lesnars there guys. Hogan's body is F'd up though in that pic. Look at his knees. He could barely stand. This was BEFORE his hip surgery.
The top of Hogan's head is higher than Lesnars there guys. Hogan's body is F'd up though in that pic. Look at his knees. He could barely stand. This was BEFORE his hip surgery.
Viper said on 25/Feb/07
They look the exact same height. I think Lesnar has a footwear advantange.
They look the exact same height. I think Lesnar has a footwear advantange.
6'2.5'' JK said on 24/Feb/07
Good pic vegas, but i don't see dffernce in the pic, they both are the exact same height!! (1.5 diffence LMAO!!)
Good pic vegas, but i don't see dffernce in the pic, they both are the exact same height!! (1.5 diffence LMAO!!)
Vegas said on 24/Feb/07
Brock is 6'2 i think though, difference looks about 1"-1.5" to me putting Hogan at either 6'3 or 6'3.5" in 2002
Brock is 6'2 i think though, difference looks about 1"-1.5" to me putting Hogan at either 6'3 or 6'3.5" in 2002
Vegas said on 23/Feb/07
Lesnar and Hogan from August 2002, sorry for the various black marks my computer is having trouble getting screenshots from a dvd :(
Click Here
Lesnar and Hogan from August 2002, sorry for the various black marks my computer is having trouble getting screenshots from a dvd :(
Click Here
Danimal said on 17/Feb/07
This is for ALEX. ALEX buddy, here is the footage of Goldberg and Lesnar, where Goldberg was clearly taller than Lesnar: Click Here
This is for ALEX. ALEX buddy, here is the footage of Goldberg and Lesnar, where Goldberg was clearly taller than Lesnar: Click Here
6'2.5'' JK said on 13/Jan/07
Lesnar is nothing more than 6'2''
Lesnar is nothing more than 6'2''
Danimal said on 13/Jan/07
Which makes sense seeing Hogan was still PRE his 2004-2005 Hip Replacement and could have been just under 6'3.5" at that point.
Which makes sense seeing Hogan was still PRE his 2004-2005 Hip Replacement and could have been just under 6'3.5" at that point.
Dunken said on 3/Jan/07
well, Lesnar will be debuting at K-1 Hero's in February (MMA). hopefull he'll fighting shoeless against someone shoeless.
Sherdog has a pretty acurrate listing for all MMA fighters (they give Lesnar 6'2 as well) so we'll just wait and see.
well, Lesnar will be debuting at K-1 Hero's in February (MMA). hopefull he'll fighting shoeless against someone shoeless.
Sherdog has a pretty acurrate listing for all MMA fighters (they give Lesnar 6'2 as well) so we'll just wait and see.
Alex said on 2/Jan/07
Legend Stopper, I agree that Lesnar is 6'2 but Goldberg is also 6'2. Goldberg doesn't look taller than Lesnar by any amount.
Legend Stopper, I agree that Lesnar is 6'2 but Goldberg is also 6'2. Goldberg doesn't look taller than Lesnar by any amount.
jonn14 said on 16/Oct/06
brock vs big show even though shows bigger brock is better look out 4 lesnar in ecw
brock vs big show even though shows bigger brock is better look out 4 lesnar in ecw
Viper652 said on 2/Oct/06
Danimal, funny thing is Jason beleives none of that :)
Danimal, funny thing is Jason beleives none of that :)
Alex said on 30/Sep/06
Hogan didn't have more than an inch on Lesnar in their few faceoffs.
Hogan didn't have more than an inch on Lesnar in their few faceoffs.
Alex said on 29/Sep/06
Viper, I think Lesnar was probably wearing bigger boots against UT in that faceoff between them. I strongly think UT would have a 5 inches on lesnar in barefeet.
Viper, I think Lesnar was probably wearing bigger boots against UT in that faceoff between them. I strongly think UT would have a 5 inches on lesnar in barefeet.
Danimal said on 29/Sep/06
Hogan had more on him than what that pic shows. Guaranteed Hogan's knees were bent, as well as his neck curved. I saw that match and when Hogan stood straight, then difference was about 2", putting Brock at 6'1.5" and Hogan at 6'3.5". Hogan would have dwarfed Brock, The Rock, HHH and all other competitors back in the 80's. Sad.
Hogan had more on him than what that pic shows. Guaranteed Hogan's knees were bent, as well as his neck curved. I saw that match and when Hogan stood straight, then difference was about 2", putting Brock at 6'1.5" and Hogan at 6'3.5". Hogan would have dwarfed Brock, The Rock, HHH and all other competitors back in the 80's. Sad.
ralph said on 29/Sep/06
Oh my God, The Man !! Hogan is wearing a cap! , like in the rock's pic!!
Oh my God, The Man !! Hogan is wearing a cap! , like in the rock's pic!!
Viper652 said on 29/Sep/06
"My conclussion is that Brock Lensar is more than 188 cms.I have seen him beside solofa fatu (rikishi) who is 185 cms, and looked two inches taller. Beside 6'7.5" undertaker he always looks about four inches shorter, and the 6'3.5"-6'4" rock is only half inch taller than him. And here is a good pic with hogan."
Which proves that Rock is 6-2,
"My conclussion is that Brock Lensar is more than 188 cms.I have seen him beside solofa fatu (rikishi) who is 185 cms, and looked two inches taller. Beside 6'7.5" undertaker he always looks about four inches shorter, and the 6'3.5"-6'4" rock is only half inch taller than him. And here is a good pic with hogan."
Which proves that Rock is 6-2,
TheMan said on 29/Sep/06
Hogans head is over lesnars if you look carefully. But lesnar is also wearing lifts probably to make him look taller. I think he is 6,2 188cm on the dot. Youve got to remember WWE wanted you to think Lesnar was a legit 6,4.
Hogans head is over lesnars if you look carefully. But lesnar is also wearing lifts probably to make him look taller. I think he is 6,2 188cm on the dot. Youve got to remember WWE wanted you to think Lesnar was a legit 6,4.
Rocker said on 29/Sep/06
In barefeet Lesnar would be 6ft 1 MAX
In barefeet Lesnar would be 6ft 1 MAX
Cobra said on 28/Sep/06
I have seen the hogan/lesnar picture, and it is pretty weird... for Lesnar, anything under 6ft2 is out of question. it could be that he is a tad more than that.
I have seen the hogan/lesnar picture, and it is pretty weird... for Lesnar, anything under 6ft2 is out of question. it could be that he is a tad more than that.
Danimal said on 27/Sep/06
Taker was just under 6'8" in his prime. We have to remember that in 1990, Taker still had at least 2" on a 6'5"-6'6" Hogan. He's probably around 6'6"-6'6.5" today.
BTW Frank, time to do some slaughtering!!!!!! Just joking Jason ;).
Taker was just under 6'8" in his prime. We have to remember that in 1990, Taker still had at least 2" on a 6'5"-6'6" Hogan. He's probably around 6'6"-6'6.5" today.
BTW Frank, time to do some slaughtering!!!!!! Just joking Jason ;).
ralph said on 26/Sep/06
Lesnar is exactly the same height of goldberg and hhh.6'2.5".
Lesnar is exactly the same height of goldberg and hhh.6'2.5".
Viper652 said on 26/Sep/06
Jason, you think Undertaker forgot his lifts that night with Lesnar?
Jason, you think Undertaker forgot his lifts that night with Lesnar?
Viper652 said on 26/Sep/06
I hate trolls like JK that add nothing to the discussion. JK I would advise you to come back to this site when you are mature enough.
I hate trolls like JK that add nothing to the discussion. JK I would advise you to come back to this site when you are mature enough.
Alex said on 26/Sep/06
UT has shrunk a little. Maybe not as much as some think but around an inch I'd say. He was no shorter than 6'7.5 in his prime though and now no shorter than 6'6.5.
UT has shrunk a little. Maybe not as much as some think but around an inch I'd say. He was no shorter than 6'7.5 in his prime though and now no shorter than 6'6.5.
Viper652 said on 26/Sep/06
I really doubt UT was ever 6-8 in his prime.
I really doubt UT was ever 6-8 in his prime.
Alex said on 26/Sep/06
UT looks 6'8ish in the picture with Frank though and UT is on a ramp too and still had Frank by several inches. There is a bigger difference between Frank and UT then there was with me and my friend so that would make 6'5.5 seem too short for UT unless UT was wearing lifts with Frank which we can't say yet.
UT looks 6'8ish in the picture with Frank though and UT is on a ramp too and still had Frank by several inches. There is a bigger difference between Frank and UT then there was with me and my friend so that would make 6'5.5 seem too short for UT unless UT was wearing lifts with Frank which we can't say yet.
Alex said on 26/Sep/06
My estimate for UT currently is 6'6.5-6'7. Use to be about 6'8 in his prime.
My estimate for UT currently is 6'6.5-6'7. Use to be about 6'8 in his prime.
Viper652 said on 25/Sep/06
JK,`please get your eyes checked son. If you see 6-8 there then I feel sorry for you.
JK,`please get your eyes checked son. If you see 6-8 there then I feel sorry for you.
Alex said on 25/Sep/06
Viper, there was a picture I posted some months ago with me and my friend who is between 6'5-6'5.5 and I am 6'0-6'0.5 so we're around 5 inches apart and there was a smaller difference between me and him than there is with Frank and UT on the UT page.
Viper, there was a picture I posted some months ago with me and my friend who is between 6'5-6'5.5 and I am 6'0-6'0.5 so we're around 5 inches apart and there was a smaller difference between me and him than there is with Frank and UT on the UT page.
Alex said on 25/Sep/06
I do believe UT to be 6'7, 6'6 and change at the least so Lesnar could be wearing lifts there since he was facing UT and wanted to seem closer in height.
I do believe UT to be 6'7, 6'6 and change at the least so Lesnar could be wearing lifts there since he was facing UT and wanted to seem closer in height.
Viper652 said on 25/Sep/06
JK, you think every wrestler is close to their billed heights, now thats DAFT.
JK, you think every wrestler is close to their billed heights, now thats DAFT.
Viper652 said on 25/Sep/06
Lesnar only looks 6-1/185cm to me. I know Jason mentioned that Meathead320 sees him a lot in Minnesota and said hes nother over 6-1. I beleive Undertaker is 6-6 minimum but in that picture with Lesnar he appears 6-5ish. He doesnt look anywhere close to 6-8.
Lesnar only looks 6-1/185cm to me. I know Jason mentioned that Meathead320 sees him a lot in Minnesota and said hes nother over 6-1. I beleive Undertaker is 6-6 minimum but in that picture with Lesnar he appears 6-5ish. He doesnt look anywhere close to 6-8.
JK said on 25/Sep/06
hahahaha 6'5'' undertaker, don't make me laugh, Undertaker is 6'8'' minimum!!
Viper come on man out of all the daftest things you have said in the past how can u say UT is 6'5''?!? LMAO
hahahaha 6'5'' undertaker, don't make me laugh, Undertaker is 6'8'' minimum!!
Viper come on man out of all the daftest things you have said in the past how can u say UT is 6'5''?!? LMAO
Jason said on 25/Sep/06
Lesnar looked 6'1 1/2''/187cm to me in person.
Lesnar looked 6'1 1/2''/187cm to me in person.
Viper652 said on 24/Sep/06
Undertaker is only 6-5 there.
Undertaker is only 6-5 there.
Alex said on 24/Sep/06
JK, its a good picture but we can't see footwear though. Lesnar never looked like he really wore lifts to me though. If UT and Lesnar have their heads straight then UT is at least 4 inches taller. It only looks 3-3.5 inches in that picture though.
JK, its a good picture but we can't see footwear though. Lesnar never looked like he really wore lifts to me though. If UT and Lesnar have their heads straight then UT is at least 4 inches taller. It only looks 3-3.5 inches in that picture though.
JK said on 24/Sep/06
Nice pic Alex, it shows that Lesnar is a legit 6'2'' barefoot and 6'4'' in wrestling boots.
Nice pic Alex, it shows that Lesnar is a legit 6'2'' barefoot and 6'4'' in wrestling boots.
Alex said on 23/Sep/06
Viper, ever see this picture between Lesnar and UT? Ever since Lesnar and UT's freud 4 years ago I questioned the 6 inch difference WWE had them as. Lesnar does look a legit 6'2 guy to me so UT looks barely 6'6 if that in this picture but Lesnar could be in bigger boots which I am not sure of. Plus Lesnar is looking up and UT is looking down so it makes the difference a little less than if both guys are looking straight.
Click Here
Viper, ever see this picture between Lesnar and UT? Ever since Lesnar and UT's freud 4 years ago I questioned the 6 inch difference WWE had them as. Lesnar does look a legit 6'2 guy to me so UT looks barely 6'6 if that in this picture but Lesnar could be in bigger boots which I am not sure of. Plus Lesnar is looking up and UT is looking down so it makes the difference a little less than if both guys are looking straight.
Click Here
ralph said on 20/Sep/06
I think he is exactly 189 cms but this height is nearer to 6'2" than to 6'3", so minnesota vikings put him at 6'2".
I think he is exactly 189 cms but this height is nearer to 6'2" than to 6'3", so minnesota vikings put him at 6'2".
JK said on 20/Sep/06
You mean a solid 6'2'', i agree with Robs listing,
You mean a solid 6'2'', i agree with Robs listing,
Viper652 said on 14/Sep/06
Hes taller than just 6-0 1/2. Hes a solid 6-1 guy.
Hes taller than just 6-0 1/2. Hes a solid 6-1 guy.
Rocker said on 14/Sep/06
Lesnar is down for 6'2 but wrestling barefoot he would be 6ft'.05
Lesnar is down for 6'2 but wrestling barefoot he would be 6ft'.05
Viper652 said on 13/Sep/06
Undertaker is no taller than 6-7. And Lesnar is around 6-1.
Undertaker is no taller than 6-7. And Lesnar is around 6-1.
bantha poo doo!! said on 13/Sep/06
omg u all talk so much bulls***. brock lesnar isnt 6 ft2 that would make everyone else tiny,that would make kurt about 5 ft8! and undertaker about 6ft 7. besides ive seen him and he's easily 6ft4.
omg u all talk so much bulls***. brock lesnar isnt 6 ft2 that would make everyone else tiny,that would make kurt about 5 ft8! and undertaker about 6ft 7. besides ive seen him and he's easily 6ft4.
Danimal said on 12/Sep/06
IT's different for bodybuilder's who have more muscle than the average man. It weighs more and you must take that into account. Either way, it's between 5-10 pounds per inch on average. Lets say 7-8 then.
IT's different for bodybuilder's who have more muscle than the average man. It weighs more and you must take that into account. Either way, it's between 5-10 pounds per inch on average. Lets say 7-8 then.
Alex said on 11/Sep/06
I've always thought it was 5 lbs for every inch no matter what height or whatever.
I've always thought it was 5 lbs for every inch no matter what height or whatever.
Viper652 said on 11/Sep/06
Lesnar would make almost anyone look smaller in comparison. Hes built like a tank.
Lesnar would make almost anyone look smaller in comparison. Hes built like a tank.
Danimal said on 10/Sep/06
I always wondered how much I would have weighed at my peak if I would have been over 6'0". They say for every inch over 6'0" you add 10 pounds for people who lift weights and every 1" under 6'0" you add 5 pounds.
I always wondered how much I would have weighed at my peak if I would have been over 6'0". They say for every inch over 6'0" you add 10 pounds for people who lift weights and every 1" under 6'0" you add 5 pounds.
Alex said on 9/Sep/06
Lesnar is 290lbs so yea just about 100lbs as I am 195lbs. But he has around 1.5 inches on me I'd say. My friend who peaked at 295lbs who is also 6'5.5 wasn't as big as Lesnar, but also he had more body fat too with muscle but still wasn't as big for sure.
Lesnar is 290lbs so yea just about 100lbs as I am 195lbs. But he has around 1.5 inches on me I'd say. My friend who peaked at 295lbs who is also 6'5.5 wasn't as big as Lesnar, but also he had more body fat too with muscle but still wasn't as big for sure.
Alex said on 8/Sep/06
I'd like to meet Lesnar too. I'd get to see how tall he is compared to me which would be a very good comparison but mostly I'd just like to see the guy in person to see how massive and muscular he would be. I am big myself and he's make me look def thinner.
I'd like to meet Lesnar too. I'd get to see how tall he is compared to me which would be a very good comparison but mostly I'd just like to see the guy in person to see how massive and muscular he would be. I am big myself and he's make me look def thinner.
Alex said on 7/Sep/06
I'd say take 1/2 off Goldberg, I could see HHH at 6'1 and change but give Lesnar 1/2 inch.
I'd say take 1/2 off Goldberg, I could see HHH at 6'1 and change but give Lesnar 1/2 inch.
Viper652 said on 7/Sep/06
I almost agree with you Danimal, Except shave off a half inch on Lesnar and another inch on Goldberg.
I almost agree with you Danimal, Except shave off a half inch on Lesnar and another inch on Goldberg.
Danimal said on 6/Sep/06
I stand by this:
Lesnar is 6'1.5".
HHH is 6'1.25".
Goldberg is 6'2.5".
I stand by this:
Lesnar is 6'1.5".
HHH is 6'1.25".
Goldberg is 6'2.5".
Alex said on 6/Sep/06
I do agree with JK on that they all look like 6'2 guys. lol
I do agree with JK on that they all look like 6'2 guys. lol
JK said on 5/Sep/06
Finally we both agree on something Alex, Goldberg, HHH and Brock Lesnar are all a legit 6'2''
Finally we both agree on something Alex, Goldberg, HHH and Brock Lesnar are all a legit 6'2''
Alex said on 5/Sep/06
JK, I am sure they all aren't over 6'2. Lesnar and Goldberg are 6'2 I strongly think. HHH probably but he can look closer to 6'1 though sometimes.
JK, I am sure they all aren't over 6'2. Lesnar and Goldberg are 6'2 I strongly think. HHH probably but he can look closer to 6'1 though sometimes.
JK said on 4/Sep/06
All of them are 6'2'' Alex, 6'2'' the LEAST.
All of them are 6'2'' Alex, 6'2'' the LEAST.
Alex said on 4/Sep/06
I'm thinking HHH, Lesnar and Goldberg are all 6'2 guys. 6'1.5 at the very least.
I'm thinking HHH, Lesnar and Goldberg are all 6'2 guys. 6'1.5 at the very least.
Ola said on 31/Aug/06
ok! could be... i believe they're both 6'3 :-)
ok! could be... i believe they're both 6'3 :-)
JK said on 30/Aug/06
I so them once face to face and they both actually appeared the exact same height, i think Goldberg and HHH are both 6'2''.
I so them once face to face and they both actually appeared the exact same height, i think Goldberg and HHH are both 6'2''.
Ola said on 28/Aug/06
HHH shorter than goldberg? no way.
does anyone have pics of those two together?
HHH shorter than goldberg? no way.
does anyone have pics of those two together?
Alex said on 26/Aug/06
Lesnar would be 6'3-6'4 in footwear.
I'd say...
Lesnar 6'2
Goldberg 6'2
HHH 6'1.5-6'2
I really think all guys are about 6'2
Lesnar would be 6'3-6'4 in footwear.
I'd say...
Lesnar 6'2
Goldberg 6'2
HHH 6'1.5-6'2
I really think all guys are about 6'2
Ola said on 25/Aug/06
The Rock has goldberg with 1 inch easly, and goldberg has lesnar with 1 inch.
rock: 6'4
gold: 6'3
brock 6'2
The Rock has goldberg with 1 inch easly, and goldberg has lesnar with 1 inch.
rock: 6'4
gold: 6'3
brock 6'2
Danimal said on 25/Aug/06
Lesnar is 6'1.5".
HHH is 6'1.25".
Goldberg is 6'2.5".
Lesnar is 6'1.5".
HHH is 6'1.25".
Goldberg is 6'2.5".
JK said on 24/Aug/06
I know lesnar is 6'2'', but sometimes he does look 6'3'' or 6'4'' to me, maybe its just me.
I know lesnar is 6'2'', but sometimes he does look 6'3'' or 6'4'' to me, maybe its just me.
Viper652 said on 24/Aug/06
I would love to be able to link the picture of Charles Barkely making Goldberg look 6-0 in Goldberg's book.
I would love to be able to link the picture of Charles Barkely making Goldberg look 6-0 in Goldberg's book.
Danimal said on 23/Aug/06
Viper, Goldberg is taller than Lesnar and was also listed 1" taller than him in the NFL. If anything, Lesnar is around HHH's height (maybe a 1/4"-1/2" an inch taller) and Golderg is about an inch taller than Lesnar and 1.25"-1.5" taller than HHH. That's a lot more logical than saying they're all the exact same height, when clearly they're not, seeing they have stood next to each other at certain points in time.
Viper, Goldberg is taller than Lesnar and was also listed 1" taller than him in the NFL. If anything, Lesnar is around HHH's height (maybe a 1/4"-1/2" an inch taller) and Golderg is about an inch taller than Lesnar and 1.25"-1.5" taller than HHH. That's a lot more logical than saying they're all the exact same height, when clearly they're not, seeing they have stood next to each other at certain points in time.
Viper652 said on 18/Aug/06
All 3 of those guys are a flat 6-1.
All 3 of those guys are a flat 6-1.
Viper652 said on 18/Aug/06
He generally looks a flat 6-1 to me.
He generally looks a flat 6-1 to me.
Alex said on 18/Aug/06
Lesnar does look a legit 6'2 in my opinion. 6'1.5 at the very least but 6'2 seems more accurate with me. Goldberg looks the same as Lesnar and if he was taller I bet he had bigger boots on since he and HHH are about the same height too. All are 6'1.5-6'2.
Lesnar does look a legit 6'2 in my opinion. 6'1.5 at the very least but 6'2 seems more accurate with me. Goldberg looks the same as Lesnar and if he was taller I bet he had bigger boots on since he and HHH are about the same height too. All are 6'1.5-6'2.
Alex said on 18/Aug/06
Most WWE guys are inflated anywhere from 1-3 inches. A couple 4 inches or around there.
Most WWE guys are inflated anywhere from 1-3 inches. A couple 4 inches or around there.
Viper652 said on 18/Aug/06
Yeah, 6-2 Rock has an inch on him.
Yeah, 6-2 Rock has an inch on him.
JK said on 18/Aug/06
he is a legit 6'2'', he dosent look any shorter than The Rock who is nearly 6'4'', watch summerslam 2002 Viper then you will see.
he is a legit 6'2'', he dosent look any shorter than The Rock who is nearly 6'4'', watch summerslam 2002 Viper then you will see.
Viper652 said on 17/Aug/06
Well, I think you are wrong Danimal.
Well, I think you are wrong Danimal.
Danimal said on 17/Aug/06
Viper, he's listed at 6'2" in the NFL. He's NOT less than 6'1.5". Get over it!!!
Viper, he's listed at 6'2" in the NFL. He's NOT less than 6'1.5". Get over it!!!
Viper652 said on 17/Aug/06
The WWE exaggerates up to 3 inches, and sometimes more for a few select guys. To say just 1-2 inches is totally bogus.
The WWE exaggerates up to 3 inches, and sometimes more for a few select guys. To say just 1-2 inches is totally bogus.
Viper652 said on 17/Aug/06
Lesnar doesnt look 6-2 to me. 6-1 and change max.
Lesnar doesnt look 6-2 to me. 6-1 and change max.
JK said on 16/Aug/06
Brock Lesnar is a legit 6'2'', anything under is just ridiculous. Even Editor Rob thinks he is 6'2''.
Brock Lesnar is a legit 6'2'', anything under is just ridiculous. Even Editor Rob thinks he is 6'2''.
Anonymous said on 16/Aug/06
To find the right height, just take the average of Vipers estimates and the heights form the WWE.
The WWE adds 1 or 2 inches to the real heights while Viper always draws off 1 or 2 inches...
Lesnar is for sure 6ft2, Goldberg 6ft3 and HHH also 6ft2 or maybe a shade above.
To find the right height, just take the average of Vipers estimates and the heights form the WWE.
The WWE adds 1 or 2 inches to the real heights while Viper always draws off 1 or 2 inches...
Lesnar is for sure 6ft2, Goldberg 6ft3 and HHH also 6ft2 or maybe a shade above.
Danimal said on 15/Aug/06
Viper, I beg to differ. Goldberg is taller than all 3 of them. He's at least 6'2.5". Lesnar is probably 6'1.5". HHH is 6'1.25".
Viper, I beg to differ. Goldberg is taller than all 3 of them. He's at least 6'2.5". Lesnar is probably 6'1.5". HHH is 6'1.25".
Viper652 said on 15/Aug/06
They are all 6-1.
They are all 6-1.
Alex said on 14/Aug/06
Goldberg and HHH look the exact same height. Don't HHH and Lesnar look the same too. I highly doubt HHH is any taller than Lesnar. If anything Lesnar is taller then HHH.
Goldberg and HHH look the exact same height. Don't HHH and Lesnar look the same too. I highly doubt HHH is any taller than Lesnar. If anything Lesnar is taller then HHH.
Danimal said on 4/Aug/06
YEah, I agree with you the man. There is footage of them together backstage and Goldberg is taller.
YEah, I agree with you the man. There is footage of them together backstage and Goldberg is taller.
Dude said on 4/Aug/06
I'm sure Lesnar is down for 6'3,but when he was barefoot backstage he was nearer 6'2.
I'm sure Lesnar is down for 6'3,but when he was barefoot backstage he was nearer 6'2.
Dude said on 3/Aug/06
Lesnar wearing shoes has him at 6'2 but can any one tell me his barefeet height
Lesnar wearing shoes has him at 6'2 but can any one tell me his barefeet height
JK said on 2/Aug/06
same here Rob, even i think he is 6'2'', when brock was in the WWE i used to think he was nearer to 6'4''.
same here Rob, even i think he is 6'2'', when brock was in the WWE i used to think he was nearer to 6'4''.
TheMan said on 1/Aug/06
Goldberg is pretty tall he was taller than austin by nearly 2 inches with Austin in he's big boots when lesnar looked near on he's height. Goldberg was also only about a cm and half shorter than the rock. He was actually quite clearly taller than Lesnar you could notice it. It was at the suvivor series and the royal rumble both times he was over lesnar. I think they were both in shoes. Lesnars just about 6,2 whilst goldbergs actually is near on 6,3 from what ive seen. Their not the exact same height and Goldbergs about 2 cm taller. Ill try and find the video maybe it's on u tube somewhere. I remember being surprised as i thought you wouldent be able to notice the diffrence but it was clear to me. Lesnars perhaps 188cm goldbergs about 190cm rocks about 192cm.
Goldberg is pretty tall he was taller than austin by nearly 2 inches with Austin in he's big boots when lesnar looked near on he's height. Goldberg was also only about a cm and half shorter than the rock. He was actually quite clearly taller than Lesnar you could notice it. It was at the suvivor series and the royal rumble both times he was over lesnar. I think they were both in shoes. Lesnars just about 6,2 whilst goldbergs actually is near on 6,3 from what ive seen. Their not the exact same height and Goldbergs about 2 cm taller. Ill try and find the video maybe it's on u tube somewhere. I remember being surprised as i thought you wouldent be able to notice the diffrence but it was clear to me. Lesnars perhaps 188cm goldbergs about 190cm rocks about 192cm.
Alex said on 24/Jul/06
Maybe Lesnar was barefoot backstage while Goldberg was in boots?
Maybe Lesnar was barefoot backstage while Goldberg was in boots?
Danimal said on 24/Jul/06
Actually, I'm pretty sure he wasn't in lifts Alex. I'm pretty sure Lesner wasn't wearing his backstage and that's why he was shorter. Goldberg's shoes were ALWAYS less than 1". They were FLAT.
Actually, I'm pretty sure he wasn't in lifts Alex. I'm pretty sure Lesner wasn't wearing his backstage and that's why he was shorter. Goldberg's shoes were ALWAYS less than 1". They were FLAT.
Alex said on 23/Jul/06
Someone post pics of Lesnar and Goldberg together.
Someone post pics of Lesnar and Goldberg together.
Alex said on 23/Jul/06
Goldberg was in lifts I bet because in the ring they looked the exact same height. Both looking about 6'2.
Goldberg was in lifts I bet because in the ring they looked the exact same height. Both looking about 6'2.
TheMan said on 23/Jul/06
Danimal im with you dude. I saw it on both the occasions i stated id Goldbergs near 190cm 6,3. 187-188 for lesnar and a weak 190 for goldberg.
Danimal im with you dude. I saw it on both the occasions i stated id Goldbergs near 190cm 6,3. 187-188 for lesnar and a weak 190 for goldberg.
Danimal said on 22/Jul/06
Actually Alex, I was referring to when they were talking backstage. It may not have been RIGHT before Wrestlemania, but it was days before on Raw or Smackdown. Goldberg was clearly the taller of the two.
Actually Alex, I was referring to when they were talking backstage. It may not have been RIGHT before Wrestlemania, but it was days before on Raw or Smackdown. Goldberg was clearly the taller of the two.
Viper652 said on 22/Jul/06
Saying Goldberg is over 6-2 is really stretching it Danimal.
Saying Goldberg is over 6-2 is really stretching it Danimal.
TheMan said on 22/Jul/06
There was actaully a visable diffrence between lesnar and goldberg even up to 2cm. I saw it at the survivor series and at the royal rumble when they faced up. You know when sometimes wrestler appear the same height this did not happen Goldberg was just a little taller on both occasions.
There was actaully a visable diffrence between lesnar and goldberg even up to 2cm. I saw it at the survivor series and at the royal rumble when they faced up. You know when sometimes wrestler appear the same height this did not happen Goldberg was just a little taller on both occasions.
Alex said on 22/Jul/06
I didn't see a difference between Goldberg and Lesnar. HHH and Goldberg look the exact same height too.
I didn't see a difference between Goldberg and Lesnar. HHH and Goldberg look the exact same height too.
TheMan said on 22/Jul/06
I think lesnar is about 188cm just about 6,2 and cena 184 nearly 6,1 cm making that staredown for lesnar at just 6,2. I think goldberg is nearly 6,3 though.
I think lesnar is about 188cm just about 6,2 and cena 184 nearly 6,1 cm making that staredown for lesnar at just 6,2. I think goldberg is nearly 6,3 though.
Alex said on 21/Jul/06
The pic with Cena and Lesnar actually looks more than an inch. 1.5 inches.
The pic with Cena and Lesnar actually looks more than an inch. 1.5 inches.
Alex said on 21/Jul/06
I thought Goldberg and Lesnar looked the exact same height.
I thought Goldberg and Lesnar looked the exact same height.
Danimal said on 21/Jul/06
Goldberg is defintely over 6'2" though. He had Lesnar by at least 1.5" before their Wrestlemania match. I can see Lesnar at 6'1.25" and Goldberg at 6'2.75".
Goldberg is defintely over 6'2" though. He had Lesnar by at least 1.5" before their Wrestlemania match. I can see Lesnar at 6'1.25" and Goldberg at 6'2.75".
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.