Add a Comment815 comments
Average Guess (200 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 1.32in (186.2cm)
Current: 5ft 11.64in (182cm)
Peak: 6ft 1.32in (186.2cm)
Current: 5ft 11.64in (182cm)
SaveUsY2J said on 8/Aug/14
Vince was never taller than Austin, if anything Austin was a fraction taller.
Today 5'11.5-6'0, peak about 6'1
Vince was never taller than Austin, if anything Austin was a fraction taller.
Today 5'11.5-6'0, peak about 6'1
Vegas said on 7/Aug/14
Height181 says on 3/Aug/14
It shows Vince is no taller than 5'11'' as of today
_________
you should go onto andres page and state that given vince at the 2013 hof was taller than bob backlund who a few on there think is over 6ft..
Height181 says on 3/Aug/14
It shows Vince is no taller than 5'11'' as of today
_________
you should go onto andres page and state that given vince at the 2013 hof was taller than bob backlund who a few on there think is over 6ft..
Alex 6'0 said on 6/Aug/14
Vince was taller than Austin who could have been 6'0.5 at his peak which puts Vince 6'1 peak. Today 5'11 I agree. 2 inches lost in his 60s seems right
Vince was taller than Austin who could have been 6'0.5 at his peak which puts Vince 6'1 peak. Today 5'11 I agree. 2 inches lost in his 60s seems right
James B said on 5/Aug/14
He always looked 6'1 flat in his prime. Today looks 5'11.5.
He always looked 6'1 flat in his prime. Today looks 5'11.5.
Alex 6'0 said on 2/Aug/14
Vince going from 6'1 to 5'11 I can see at his age. 2 inches lost is very possible
Vince going from 6'1 to 5'11 I can see at his age. 2 inches lost is very possible
Alex 6'0 said on 30/Jul/14
At least 6'1 peak. Was always a little taller than Stone Cold. Today 5'11.5 seems accurate.
At least 6'1 peak. Was always a little taller than Stone Cold. Today 5'11.5 seems accurate.
Bernardo said on 6/Jun/14
6'0 spot on IMO.
6'0 spot on IMO.
ElRaloir said on 24/May/14
He doesn't look like he lost a lot of height. I'd say this current listing is accurate
He doesn't look like he lost a lot of height. I'd say this current listing is accurate
Marcus Hickman said on 23/May/14
Jerry Lawler
5' 10.5" peak
5' 10" current
Jerry Lawler
5' 10.5" peak
5' 10" current
Cap said on 14/May/14
Doesen't look 6' to me, when he has segments with CM Punk, he wears shoes that obviously lift him abit, and he and Punk look level.
Doesen't look 6' to me, when he has segments with CM Punk, he wears shoes that obviously lift him abit, and he and Punk look level.
miko said on 6/Mar/14
6'1 at his tallest, probably down to 6'0.5 range in the mid/late 2000's and looks a bit under 6'0 today, although a 6'0 listing might be a fairer one at present.
6'1 at his tallest, probably down to 6'0.5 range in the mid/late 2000's and looks a bit under 6'0 today, although a 6'0 listing might be a fairer one at present.
Dannno said on 21/Feb/14
Daniel Bryan might have been given some lifts in his dress shoes for that segment, I mean look at him next to Stephanie who was in high heels, he was still at eye level with her.
Daniel Bryan 5'7.5 - 5'8.5 (5'9.5 in wrestling boots or dress shoes?)
Vince McMahon 5'11.5 - 6'0 (6'1.5 6'2 peak)
Daniel Bryan might have been given some lifts in his dress shoes for that segment, I mean look at him next to Stephanie who was in high heels, he was still at eye level with her.
Daniel Bryan 5'7.5 - 5'8.5 (5'9.5 in wrestling boots or dress shoes?)
Vince McMahon 5'11.5 - 6'0 (6'1.5 6'2 peak)
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Jan/14
"Peak height was 6ft 2in (188cm)"
Easily looked that even in the 90s. Was still looking 186-187cm range in the early 2000s.
"Peak height was 6ft 2in (188cm)"
Easily looked that even in the 90s. Was still looking 186-187cm range in the early 2000s.
James said on 11/Jan/14
I think 6'1 (185cm) peak and 5'11.5 (182cm) today
I think 6'1 (185cm) peak and 5'11.5 (182cm) today
Lu said on 5/Dec/13
Omiko says on 29/Jan/13
Brock Lesnar dwarfed Vince last night, no way is he still 6'0 today.
He has never been... 5'11 peak tops
Omiko says on 29/Jan/13
Brock Lesnar dwarfed Vince last night, no way is he still 6'0 today.
He has never been... 5'11 peak tops
Doink said on 26/Oct/13
The big thing to keep in mind with Vince McMahon is he probably tried to wear as flat of dress shoes as he could when he was an announcer (to make the wrestlers look taller) and then likely switched to using bigger shoes/lifts once he became the "Mr. McMahon" character in 1997/98. Wouldn't surprise me if he goes back to flat shoes while in a segment with someone like Daniel Bryan.
The big thing to keep in mind with Vince McMahon is he probably tried to wear as flat of dress shoes as he could when he was an announcer (to make the wrestlers look taller) and then likely switched to using bigger shoes/lifts once he became the "Mr. McMahon" character in 1997/98. Wouldn't surprise me if he goes back to flat shoes while in a segment with someone like Daniel Bryan.
FK said on 29/Aug/13
Looks to be either 5'11 or a weak 6' next to Daniel Bryan (Bryan Danielson) who himself claimed 5'8 on the August 5 RAW
Click Here
Looks to be either 5'11 or a weak 6' next to Daniel Bryan (Bryan Danielson) who himself claimed 5'8 on the August 5 RAW
Click Here
vegas said on 23/Aug/13
good shot of vinces footwear during the attitude era, if he was 6'0.5 barefoot he would stand about 6'2 in those boots Click Here
good shot of vinces footwear during the attitude era, if he was 6'0.5 barefoot he would stand about 6'2 in those boots Click Here
Conti said on 8/Aug/13
Brock lesnar isn't 6'2.5,he's 6'3.5.Vince McMahon didn't shrink that much maybe like an inch.Vince use to be 6'2,and now he's 6'1.
Brock lesnar isn't 6'2.5,he's 6'3.5.Vince McMahon didn't shrink that much maybe like an inch.Vince use to be 6'2,and now he's 6'1.
KT said on 7/Aug/13
He was a 5'11 guy who always wore lifts to pass as 6'1.
Today, he is around 5'10, and he doesn't wear lifts anymore. He was a lot shorter than Brock Lesnar (6'2.5) earlier this year, and he is only a few inches taller than self-claimed 5'8 Daniel Byran.
This 6'0.5 listing is inaccurate.
He was a 5'11 guy who always wore lifts to pass as 6'1.
Today, he is around 5'10, and he doesn't wear lifts anymore. He was a lot shorter than Brock Lesnar (6'2.5) earlier this year, and he is only a few inches taller than self-claimed 5'8 Daniel Byran.
This 6'0.5 listing is inaccurate.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Aug/13
Triple H 6ft2.5in(189cm)
Shane McMahon 6ft1.75in(187cm)
Vince McMahon 6ft0.5in(184cm)
That's how it looks today
Triple H 6ft2.5in(189cm)
Shane McMahon 6ft1.75in(187cm)
Vince McMahon 6ft0.5in(184cm)
That's how it looks today
dicksock said on 23/Jul/13
Vince was 6'1" in his prime and is 6' now.
Vince was 6'1" in his prime and is 6' now.
Lorne said on 23/Jul/13
Brock Lesnat is 6ft2.25. He is no taller(and to me looked a tad shorter)than 189cm Goldberg.Vince is a tricky one. Clearly not more than 184cm Today, but how much did he really lose? 6ft1.5 is certainly believable, but he could struggle to look more than 185cm, while also sometimes looking near 6'2, so he is a tricky one.
Brock Lesnat is 6ft2.25. He is no taller(and to me looked a tad shorter)than 189cm Goldberg.Vince is a tricky one. Clearly not more than 184cm Today, but how much did he really lose? 6ft1.5 is certainly believable, but he could struggle to look more than 185cm, while also sometimes looking near 6'2, so he is a tricky one.
Conti said on 15/Jul/13
Dicksock is demented,Shane McMahon was never taller than his father.Brock Lesnar is actually 6'3.5 and he was slightly taller than Vince when they were face to face in the ring 4 months ago.
Dicksock is demented,Shane McMahon was never taller than his father.Brock Lesnar is actually 6'3.5 and he was slightly taller than Vince when they were face to face in the ring 4 months ago.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Jul/13
WWE management claim he's 6"3", which I did at one point beleive.
But, I think he was 6"2" and measured 189cm out of bed. So, they rounded that up.
Today he is looking 6"1" tops, probably a bit shy of it. But, Triple H is 189cm and Shane McMahon is 188cm. They both look taller than Vince.
WWE management claim he's 6"3", which I did at one point beleive.
But, I think he was 6"2" and measured 189cm out of bed. So, they rounded that up.
Today he is looking 6"1" tops, probably a bit shy of it. But, Triple H is 189cm and Shane McMahon is 188cm. They both look taller than Vince.
James said on 2/Apr/13
I dont really believe Vince was ever legit 6 ft 2.If triple is/was 6 ft 2 and a half,than vince should be 6 ft 1.Now Vince looks shorter than 6 ft 1 Cena.
I dont really believe Vince was ever legit 6 ft 2.If triple is/was 6 ft 2 and a half,than vince should be 6 ft 1.Now Vince looks shorter than 6 ft 1 Cena.
dicksock said on 6/Mar/13
Conti says on 5/Mar/13
Shane McMahon is a solid 5'11 so therefore he looked 3 inches shorter than his father in the late 1990's and early 2000's.There heights are still the same.Vince McMahon is still a solid 6'2.
___________
What in the hell are you talking about? Shane has always looked taller than Vince. Vince is 5'11" now as he is 3" shorter than 6'2" listed Brock Lesnar. He was 6' in his prime as he was the same height as 6' Bret Hart.
Conti says on 5/Mar/13
Shane McMahon is a solid 5'11 so therefore he looked 3 inches shorter than his father in the late 1990's and early 2000's.There heights are still the same.Vince McMahon is still a solid 6'2.
___________
What in the hell are you talking about? Shane has always looked taller than Vince. Vince is 5'11" now as he is 3" shorter than 6'2" listed Brock Lesnar. He was 6' in his prime as he was the same height as 6' Bret Hart.
Conti said on 5/Mar/13
Shane McMahon is a solid 5'11 so therefore he looked 3 inches shorter than his father in the late 1990's and early 2000's.There heights are still the same.Vince McMahon is still a solid 6'2.
Shane McMahon is a solid 5'11 so therefore he looked 3 inches shorter than his father in the late 1990's and early 2000's.There heights are still the same.Vince McMahon is still a solid 6'2.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Feb/13
Looked a solid 6ft2 in the 90s
Looked a solid 6ft2 in the 90s
Peyman-6ft said on 14/Feb/13
I know many people may disagree but his real height is
6ft 1in at peak at absolute max.
5ft 11.25in nowadays.
I know many people may disagree but his real height is
6ft 1in at peak at absolute max.
5ft 11.25in nowadays.
dicksock said on 31/Jan/13
Vince is 5'11"; Brock is 6'2" imo
Vince is 5'11"; Brock is 6'2" imo
Jamesy said on 29/Jan/13
Looked 5'10 compared too Brock leaner last night on raw
Looked 5'10 compared too Brock leaner last night on raw
miko said on 29/Jan/13
Brock Lesnar dwarfed Vince last night, no way is he still 6'0 today.
Brock Lesnar dwarfed Vince last night, no way is he still 6'0 today.
dorkburger said on 27/Jan/13
Vince had neck surgery in 1999 which is why he's shorter now than he was back then. The same thing happened to Edge
Vince had neck surgery in 1999 which is why he's shorter now than he was back then. The same thing happened to Edge
Frank said on 17/Jan/13
What i believe he is about 6ft but wears lifts @ times to make him appear close to 6ft 2
What i believe he is about 6ft but wears lifts @ times to make him appear close to 6ft 2
James said on 10/Jan/13
Rob do u think he was only 184cm even back in 1999? Remember that video of him with the rock and big show
Editor Rob
Rob do u think he was only 184cm even back in 1999? Remember that video of him with the rock and big show
Editor Rob it's whether he lost any height in 90s
James said on 9/Jan/13
You considering seriously downgrading this guy rob?
Editor Rob
You considering seriously downgrading this guy rob?
Editor Rob well he's lost some height from his peak, whatever that truly is...it's true he can look barelyu over 6ft today.
James said on 2/Jan/13
Looked 5'11-6 next too the rock
Looked 5'11-6 next too the rock
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Dec/12
Peak - 6ft2/188cm
Today - 6ft1.25/186cm
Peak - 6ft2/188cm
Today - 6ft1.25/186cm
Micheal "Ebis" Raja said on 20/Dec/12
Peak = 6 ft 2
Now = 6 ft and nothing over that (He's more than 2 inches shorter than booker t now)
Peak = 6 ft 2
Now = 6 ft and nothing over that (He's more than 2 inches shorter than booker t now)
James said on 17/Nov/12
He certainly did not look as tall as 6'1.5 compared too the rock who some believe is 6'2.5.
The rock really did make Vince look under 6'0 in the 90s. I just don't see how he could have ever been
His son Shane on the other hand looks like a tall man at 6'1.25.
He certainly did not look as tall as 6'1.5 compared too the rock who some believe is 6'2.5.
The rock really did make Vince look under 6'0 in the 90s. I just don't see how he could have ever been
His son Shane on the other hand looks like a tall man at 6'1.25.
dicksock said on 15/Nov/12
Danimal says on 1/Nov/12
Taller than a legit 6'1" pro-bodybuilder in 1991, called Mike Christian. Had 2-3" on 5'11" Bobby Heenan. Was the same height as 6'2" Tony Atlas in 1980
__________
That's a blatant lie. Atlas was at least an inch taller than Vince. Also, Heenan was more like 5'10" as he was shorter than 5'11" Paul Ordorff. Plus, Vince was 2-3" shorter than 6'3" Ed Leslie in 1992. I've posted this proof on multiple occasions.
Here is Atlas looking an inch taller than Vince:
Click Here
Pause at 7 seconds. Pause at 1:42.
Vince was 6'0.5"-6'1" in his prime and is 5'11.5"-6' now.
The fact that you have Piper at 6'1.5" in his prime and Bret Hart at 5'11" is a joke.
Danimal says on 1/Nov/12
Taller than a legit 6'1" pro-bodybuilder in 1991, called Mike Christian. Had 2-3" on 5'11" Bobby Heenan. Was the same height as 6'2" Tony Atlas in 1980
__________
That's a blatant lie. Atlas was at least an inch taller than Vince. Also, Heenan was more like 5'10" as he was shorter than 5'11" Paul Ordorff. Plus, Vince was 2-3" shorter than 6'3" Ed Leslie in 1992. I've posted this proof on multiple occasions.
Here is Atlas looking an inch taller than Vince:
Click Here
Pause at 7 seconds. Pause at 1:42.
Vince was 6'0.5"-6'1" in his prime and is 5'11.5"-6' now.
The fact that you have Piper at 6'1.5" in his prime and Bret Hart at 5'11" is a joke.
James said on 23/Oct/12
I woulden't put him over 6'1 in his prime. Maybe he was over 6'1 In the morning though at one stage.
Today I would put money on him being measured at 5'11.75 and 5'11 (180cm) with slouched posture. This evident cause recently next too 5'11.25 cm punk looked a fraction with bad posture and when standing better looked too edge punk out.
I t
I woulden't put him over 6'1 in his prime. Maybe he was over 6'1 In the morning though at one stage.
Today I would put money on him being measured at 5'11.75 and 5'11 (180cm) with slouched posture. This evident cause recently next too 5'11.25 cm punk looked a fraction with bad posture and when standing better looked too edge punk out.
I t
Hamd said on 23/Oct/12
I believe Mcmahon was at least 6'1 in his prime or a little taller........and ya Ronster is right about that HHH thing there are people claiming him to be 6'2 which cannot be believed as he always towered over legit 6'1 austin by a couple of inches and the funny part is that he was always taller than lesnar in all his encounters yet he is listed as 6'2 while lesnar is listed 6'2.5
I believe Mcmahon was at least 6'1 in his prime or a little taller........and ya Ronster is right about that HHH thing there are people claiming him to be 6'2 which cannot be believed as he always towered over legit 6'1 austin by a couple of inches and the funny part is that he was always taller than lesnar in all his encounters yet he is listed as 6'2 while lesnar is listed 6'2.5
Derek said on 17/Oct/12
Still looks around 6'1.5"-6'2" next to 6'0.5" John Cena on Raw last night. Looked about an inch to an inch and a half taller than Cena. I'm still wondering about CM Punk's height. He can't be any taller than 5'11" after I've seen him next to Vince and Cena.
Still looks around 6'1.5"-6'2" next to 6'0.5" John Cena on Raw last night. Looked about an inch to an inch and a half taller than Cena. I'm still wondering about CM Punk's height. He can't be any taller than 5'11" after I've seen him next to Vince and Cena.
Ronster said on 14/Oct/12
Dicksock says; Ok, I stopped reading your comment after this remark. If you really think this way then you don't know what you're talking about. NO ONE on this site admits his mistakes more than me; NO ONE. I once had Sheamus at 6'1"-6'2" when I first saw him. Vegas quickly corrected me and I admitted my error. But I guess that doesn't count. I once had Andre at 7'-7'1", but I after review more evidence, my estimate for Andre has changed to closer to 6'11". I used to think Andre lost a lot of height by the late 80s. After studying the subject more for myself and seeing evidence presented by other posters, I admitted my mistake. I used to think Vince McMahon was 6'2", but after seeing endless amounts of evidence I now think he was around 6'1". All the evidence in the world points to Vince being 6'1" at the most. If you are too stubborn to admit that, that is your problem. As I said in a recent post on Hulk Hogan's page; Trolls...Will they ever cease?
Dicksock, you and Vegas are the two biggest bashers on here, you two live on this site and are notorious for trying to lower just about every single big mans heights, especially wrestlers as you both have some exreme and disturbing fetish need to lower heights to satisfy some sort of envey. You study photos to find the few ones with either bad posture, camera angles or distance that alter things to make someone look a few inches shorter to try and support your ludicrous claims. HHH was easily accepted as 6'4" minimum for years until you true trolls came along and started saying he is only 6'2" which is equally rediculous. To all the people on here without bias and some maturity, ignore the trolls like Dicksock and Vegas who literally live on these pages simply to try to belittle great men.
Dicksock says; Ok, I stopped reading your comment after this remark. If you really think this way then you don't know what you're talking about. NO ONE on this site admits his mistakes more than me; NO ONE. I once had Sheamus at 6'1"-6'2" when I first saw him. Vegas quickly corrected me and I admitted my error. But I guess that doesn't count. I once had Andre at 7'-7'1", but I after review more evidence, my estimate for Andre has changed to closer to 6'11". I used to think Andre lost a lot of height by the late 80s. After studying the subject more for myself and seeing evidence presented by other posters, I admitted my mistake. I used to think Vince McMahon was 6'2", but after seeing endless amounts of evidence I now think he was around 6'1". All the evidence in the world points to Vince being 6'1" at the most. If you are too stubborn to admit that, that is your problem. As I said in a recent post on Hulk Hogan's page; Trolls...Will they ever cease?
Dicksock, you and Vegas are the two biggest bashers on here, you two live on this site and are notorious for trying to lower just about every single big mans heights, especially wrestlers as you both have some exreme and disturbing fetish need to lower heights to satisfy some sort of envey. You study photos to find the few ones with either bad posture, camera angles or distance that alter things to make someone look a few inches shorter to try and support your ludicrous claims. HHH was easily accepted as 6'4" minimum for years until you true trolls came along and started saying he is only 6'2" which is equally rediculous. To all the people on here without bias and some maturity, ignore the trolls like Dicksock and Vegas who literally live on these pages simply to try to belittle great men.
James said on 10/Oct/12
Yeah punk could be 181cm. I though Vince could look a little shorter than him at times because of his hunched back
Yeah punk could be 181cm. I though Vince could look a little shorter than him at times because of his hunched back
miko said on 9/Oct/12
He was clearly shorter face to face than CM Punk on RAW last night.
Punk is maybe 5'11.5 at the very best, so McMahon is definately under 6'0 these days, posture or not.
He was clearly shorter face to face than CM Punk on RAW last night.
Punk is maybe 5'11.5 at the very best, so McMahon is definately under 6'0 these days, posture or not.
James said on 7/Oct/12
6ft '183cm' today
6ft1'185cm' peak
These days can look 5'11 with bad posture although I he was probably a legit 6'1 in the wwe golden era. In the attitude era I think he was a solid 184cm. When he reaches 70 probably will not be over 182cm.
6ft '183cm' today
6ft1'185cm' peak
These days can look 5'11 with bad posture although I he was probably a legit 6'1 in the wwe golden era. In the attitude era I think he was a solid 184cm. When he reaches 70 probably will not be over 182cm.
5ft10guy(Not Growing) said on 7/Oct/12
yeah I dont think 6'1.5 maybe just 6'0.5
yeah I dont think 6'1.5 maybe just 6'0.5
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Sep/12
Okay maybe the difference is 1.5in. But those pictures are only in the last 5 years or so. He might be 6ft1 flat today down 1in from his peak. In those pictures I estimate Triple H to be 189cm, Shane McMahon 188cm and Vince 185cm.
Okay maybe the difference is 1.5in. But those pictures are only in the last 5 years or so. He might be 6ft1 flat today down 1in from his peak. In those pictures I estimate Triple H to be 189cm, Shane McMahon 188cm and Vince 185cm.
dicksock said on 1/Sep/12
Danimal says on 28/Aug/12
dicksock says on 26/Aug/12
6'2" peak. 6'1" in the 1990's. 6'0" flat today.
___________________
How would Vince have shrunk an inch by the 90s? He wasn't a wrestler and had zero health problems. He was only 45 years old in 1990 and was in perfect shape. Plus, he was shorter than 6'2" Tony Atlas in 1980 (age 35) despite having a footware advantage.
Click Here
Vince was 6'1" at the most in his prime and is now about 6'. I can see Vince losing an inch by age 67, but not in his mid to late 40s.
Danimal says on 28/Aug/12
dicksock says on 26/Aug/12
6'2" peak. 6'1" in the 1990's. 6'0" flat today.
___________________
How would Vince have shrunk an inch by the 90s? He wasn't a wrestler and had zero health problems. He was only 45 years old in 1990 and was in perfect shape. Plus, he was shorter than 6'2" Tony Atlas in 1980 (age 35) despite having a footware advantage.
Click Here
Vince was 6'1" at the most in his prime and is now about 6'. I can see Vince losing an inch by age 67, but not in his mid to late 40s.
Danimal said on 28/Aug/12
dicksock says on 26/Aug/12
6'2" peak. 6'1" in the 1990's. 6'0" flat today.
dicksock says on 26/Aug/12
6'2" peak. 6'1" in the 1990's. 6'0" flat today.
dicksock said on 26/Aug/12
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 2/Aug/12
I think the height difference between Triple H
and Vince McMahon is not as big as it may look.
Remember Triple H is a good 20-30lbs heavier
than McMahon do he may give the impression
he's much bigger and taller. He might also wear lifts to
be more convincing as the 6ft4 Cerebal Assassin
IMO there is about 1in between Mr. McMahon
and Triple H.
______________
That is absurd. HHH is clearly more than an inch taller than Vince today. Your lift theory is completely unfounded. Triple H is ~6'2.5" and Vince is a weak 6' at the most today.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 2/Aug/12
I think the height difference between Triple H
and Vince McMahon is not as big as it may look.
Remember Triple H is a good 20-30lbs heavier
than McMahon do he may give the impression
he's much bigger and taller. He might also wear lifts to
be more convincing as the 6ft4 Cerebal Assassin
IMO there is about 1in between Mr. McMahon
and Triple H.
______________
That is absurd. HHH is clearly more than an inch taller than Vince today. Your lift theory is completely unfounded. Triple H is ~6'2.5" and Vince is a weak 6' at the most today.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Aug/12
I think the height difference between Triple H
and Vince McMahon is not as big as it may look.
Remember Triple H is a good 20-30lbs heavier
than McMahon do he may give the impression
he's much bigger and taller. He might also wear lifts to
be more convincing as the 6ft4 Cerebal Assassin
IMO there is about 1in between Mr. McMahon
and Triple H.
I think the height difference between Triple H
and Vince McMahon is not as big as it may look.
Remember Triple H is a good 20-30lbs heavier
than McMahon do he may give the impression
he's much bigger and taller. He might also wear lifts to
be more convincing as the 6ft4 Cerebal Assassin
IMO there is about 1in between Mr. McMahon
and Triple H.
dicksock said on 8/Jun/12
Vegas says on 25/Jan/12
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 21/Jan/12
Looks 1in shorter than Triple H today. In 2000 was probably
only a fraction shorter...
________
thats 2000 Click Here
__________
Well, according to this site, there is only .5" between the two...
CLEARLY, this site is wrong when it comes to these two guys; not by much, but still...
HHH is 6'2.5"-6'3" and Vince was 6'1" in his prime and is probably 6'0.5" now.
Vegas says on 25/Jan/12
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 21/Jan/12
Looks 1in shorter than Triple H today. In 2000 was probably
only a fraction shorter...
________
thats 2000 Click Here
__________
Well, according to this site, there is only .5" between the two...
CLEARLY, this site is wrong when it comes to these two guys; not by much, but still...
HHH is 6'2.5"-6'3" and Vince was 6'1" in his prime and is probably 6'0.5" now.
Vegas said on 25/Jan/12
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 21/Jan/12
Looks 1in shorter than Triple H today. In 2000 was probably
only a fraction shorter...
________
thats 2000 Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 21/Jan/12
Looks 1in shorter than Triple H today. In 2000 was probably
only a fraction shorter...
________
thats 2000 Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Jan/12
Peak height was 188cm(6"2). Just look at the clips
from 10-15 years ago. He was easily the same height
as Shane McMahon and slightly taller than Steve Austin.
Looks 1in shorter than Triple H today. In 2000 was probably
only a fraction shorter...
Peak height was 188cm(6"2). Just look at the clips
from 10-15 years ago. He was easily the same height
as Shane McMahon and slightly taller than Steve Austin.
Looks 1in shorter than Triple H today. In 2000 was probably
only a fraction shorter...
The Truth said on 16/Dec/11
Wears lifts and is clearly shorter than 6'2 Shane Mcmahon, 5'11 - 6'0 i say
Wears lifts and is clearly shorter than 6'2 Shane Mcmahon, 5'11 - 6'0 i say
dicksock said on 6/Dec/11
tell-em says on 18/Oct/11
dicksock, ive read your comments, you aint confident or correct, you are a stubborn, stubborn goofball. You never admit that you are wrong,
____________
Ok, I stopped reading your comment after this remark. If you really think this way then you don't know what you're talking about. NO ONE on this site admits his mistakes more than me; NO ONE. I once had Sheamus at 6'1"-6'2" when I first saw him. Vegas quickly corrected me and I admitted my error. But I guess that doesn't count. I once had Andre at 7'-7'1", but I after review more evidence, my estimate for Andre has changed to closer to 6'11". I used to think Andre lost a lot of height by the late 80s. After studying the subject more for myself and seeing evidence presented by other posters, I admitted my mistake. I used to think Vince McMahon was 6'2", but after seeing endless amounts of evidence I now think he was around 6'1". All the evidence in the world points to Vince being 6'1" at the most. If you are too stubborn to admit that, that is your problem. As I said in a recent post on Hulk Hogan's page; Trolls...Will they ever cease?
tell-em says on 18/Oct/11
dicksock, ive read your comments, you aint confident or correct, you are a stubborn, stubborn goofball. You never admit that you are wrong,
____________
Ok, I stopped reading your comment after this remark. If you really think this way then you don't know what you're talking about. NO ONE on this site admits his mistakes more than me; NO ONE. I once had Sheamus at 6'1"-6'2" when I first saw him. Vegas quickly corrected me and I admitted my error. But I guess that doesn't count. I once had Andre at 7'-7'1", but I after review more evidence, my estimate for Andre has changed to closer to 6'11". I used to think Andre lost a lot of height by the late 80s. After studying the subject more for myself and seeing evidence presented by other posters, I admitted my mistake. I used to think Vince McMahon was 6'2", but after seeing endless amounts of evidence I now think he was around 6'1". All the evidence in the world points to Vince being 6'1" at the most. If you are too stubborn to admit that, that is your problem. As I said in a recent post on Hulk Hogan's page; Trolls...Will they ever cease?
tell-em said on 18/Oct/11
dicksock, ive read your comments, you aint confident or correct, you are a stubborn, stubborn goofball. You never admit that you are wrong, which most of the time u are, and you insult everyone, when you are wrong, which is all the time. That qualifies you as a big baby, and a joke. i saw your vids, replied, and i posted a video, and they show my accurateness and shows how wrong you are. its funny you say you guessed people's height correctly when you can't do it here. lol.
dicksock, ive read your comments, you aint confident or correct, you are a stubborn, stubborn goofball. You never admit that you are wrong, which most of the time u are, and you insult everyone, when you are wrong, which is all the time. That qualifies you as a big baby, and a joke. i saw your vids, replied, and i posted a video, and they show my accurateness and shows how wrong you are. its funny you say you guessed people's height correctly when you can't do it here. lol.
Ras said on 18/Oct/11
If Vince is 6'0" tops then Donald Trump is 6'1" tops.
If Vince is 6'0" tops then Donald Trump is 6'1" tops.
dicksock said on 17/Oct/11
tell-em says on 10/Oct/11
blind tool. of course its true. but you think vince is 5'10 or 5'11". lol. thats ridiculous.
Whatever loser. I don't think Vince is 5'10". I have said on numerous occasions that Vince McMahon was 6'1" tops and is around 6' today but probably a little under because he's shorter than 6' John Cena on a regular basis. You are the blind one if you can't see that. I have proven this for a fact. Even Rob questions whether or not Vince wore/wears lifts. "people" like you make me sick. I am very confident in all of my estimations. I've accurately guessed more people's heights in real life than you can imagine.
tell-em says on 10/Oct/11
blind tool. of course its true. but you think vince is 5'10 or 5'11". lol. thats ridiculous.
Whatever loser. I don't think Vince is 5'10". I have said on numerous occasions that Vince McMahon was 6'1" tops and is around 6' today but probably a little under because he's shorter than 6' John Cena on a regular basis. You are the blind one if you can't see that. I have proven this for a fact. Even Rob questions whether or not Vince wore/wears lifts. "people" like you make me sick. I am very confident in all of my estimations. I've accurately guessed more people's heights in real life than you can imagine.
tell-em said on 12/Oct/11
heres vince mcmahon in regular boots next to hbk w/ casuals. mcmahon has over an inch on hbk, but due to footwear advantage. probly .5 more than hbk. still shows vince at 6'0.5" and hbk at 5'11" range. Click Here
heres vince mcmahon in regular boots next to hbk w/ casuals. mcmahon has over an inch on hbk, but due to footwear advantage. probly .5 more than hbk. still shows vince at 6'0.5" and hbk at 5'11" range. Click Here
tell-em said on 12/Oct/11
heres vince mcmahon in regular boots next to hbk w/ casuals. mcmahon has over an inch on hbk, but due to footwear advantage. probly .5 more than hbk. still shows vince at 6'0.5" and hbk at 5'11" range.
heres vince mcmahon in regular boots next to hbk w/ casuals. mcmahon has over an inch on hbk, but due to footwear advantage. probly .5 more than hbk. still shows vince at 6'0.5" and hbk at 5'11" range.
tell-em said on 10/Oct/11
blind tool. of course its true. but you think vince is 5'10 or 5'11". lol. thats ridiculous.
blind tool. of course its true. but you think vince is 5'10 or 5'11". lol. thats ridiculous.
dicksock said on 5/Oct/11
tell-em says on 4/Oct/11
dicksock, shawn michaels was always a 5'11-5'11.5" man. vince mcmahon has always been taller than him. i have vince at 6'0.5" and in that vid of dx and vince,look at vince's leg and posture. hbk has shoe and posture advantage, which is why he looks taller.
That is just not true.
tell-em says on 4/Oct/11
dicksock, shawn michaels was always a 5'11-5'11.5" man. vince mcmahon has always been taller than him. i have vince at 6'0.5" and in that vid of dx and vince,look at vince's leg and posture. hbk has shoe and posture advantage, which is why he looks taller.
That is just not true.
Chris said on 5/Oct/11
From all the pics others posted,I would suggest that Vince is no more than 6'1".Maybe when he was younger he may have been around 6'2",but not today.
From all the pics others posted,I would suggest that Vince is no more than 6'1".Maybe when he was younger he may have been around 6'2",but not today.
tell-em said on 4/Oct/11
dicksock, shawn michaels was always a 5'11-5'11.5" man. vince mcmahon has always been taller than him. i have vince at 6'0.5" and in that vid of dx and vince,look at vince's leg and posture. hbk has shoe and posture advantage, which is why he looks taller.
dicksock, shawn michaels was always a 5'11-5'11.5" man. vince mcmahon has always been taller than him. i have vince at 6'0.5" and in that vid of dx and vince,look at vince's leg and posture. hbk has shoe and posture advantage, which is why he looks taller.
dicksock said on 3/Oct/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 26/Sep/11
188cm in his prime
186-187cm today
So Vince was as tall as Tony Atlas and is still taller than John Cena?
Rob: Why don't you have a "peak height" and "current height" for Vince? He is clearly and I mean 100,000% clearly not 6'1.5" and never was. You have 6'2" for HHH and 6'1.5" for Vince, yet HHH is currently like 3"-4" taller. 6'0.5" max John Cena is taller! His peak height should be 6'0.5"-6'1" and his current height should be 5'11.5-6'0".
Here is 6'-6'0.5" John Cena with the supposedly 6'1.5" Vince:
Click Here
Click Here
PLEASE WATCH ROB AND SEE THE TRUTH
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 26/Sep/11
188cm in his prime
186-187cm today
So Vince was as tall as Tony Atlas and is still taller than John Cena?
Rob: Why don't you have a "peak height" and "current height" for Vince? He is clearly and I mean 100,000% clearly not 6'1.5" and never was. You have 6'2" for HHH and 6'1.5" for Vince, yet HHH is currently like 3"-4" taller. 6'0.5" max John Cena is taller! His peak height should be 6'0.5"-6'1" and his current height should be 5'11.5-6'0".
Here is 6'-6'0.5" John Cena with the supposedly 6'1.5" Vince:
Click Here
Click Here
PLEASE WATCH ROB AND SEE THE TRUTH
Legend said on 1/Oct/11
This guy is no more than 5'10.75 today. I'm telling you guys. Believe it.
This guy is no more than 5'10.75 today. I'm telling you guys. Believe it.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Sep/11
188cm in his prime
186-187cm today
188cm in his prime
186-187cm today
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Sep/11
Vince McMahon is 186cm-187cm
Vince McMahon is 186cm-187cm
Vegas said on 26/Sep/11
vince has the footwear advantage in this one as hbk is in slippers and vince is in doc martin type boots Click Here
vince has the footwear advantage in this one as hbk is in slippers and vince is in doc martin type boots Click Here
dicksock said on 26/Sep/11
He doesn't look any taller or even as tall as Shawn Michaels in 1997:
Click Here
Here are some others:
Click Here
Click Here
Yes, I know Michaels has a footware advantage in the last video I posted. However, he doesn't have that much of one and he is coming out taller than Vince anyway. Take away the advantage and they'd be about the same height. But, Rob I guess you'll keep on saying Vince is/was 2" taller than Shawn despite this evidence that proves otherwise. Honestly, I've seen a prime Vince look like a solid 6'1" and I've seen him look 6' or less. To me, his height is harder to pin down than Andre's or Hogan's. I doubt he was ever over 6'1" legit. Now he is shorter than 6'0.5" John Cena on a regular basis. Vince is a solid 5'11" now.
He doesn't look any taller or even as tall as Shawn Michaels in 1997:
Click Here
Here are some others:
Click Here
Click Here
Yes, I know Michaels has a footware advantage in the last video I posted. However, he doesn't have that much of one and he is coming out taller than Vince anyway. Take away the advantage and they'd be about the same height. But, Rob I guess you'll keep on saying Vince is/was 2" taller than Shawn despite this evidence that proves otherwise. Honestly, I've seen a prime Vince look like a solid 6'1" and I've seen him look 6' or less. To me, his height is harder to pin down than Andre's or Hogan's. I doubt he was ever over 6'1" legit. Now he is shorter than 6'0.5" John Cena on a regular basis. Vince is a solid 5'11" now.
James said on 8/Sep/11
In reality......
Vince McmMahon 6'0.5 (184cm)
Donald Trump 6'1.5 (187cm)
In reality......
Vince McmMahon 6'0.5 (184cm)
Donald Trump 6'1.5 (187cm)
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Aug/11
Weirdly, Vince looks taller than 187-188cm Donald Trump in these Click Here
Weirdly, Vince looks taller than 187-188cm Donald Trump in these Click Here
James said on 18/Aug/11
Triple H might measure at 187cm today.
Triple H might measure at 187cm today.
Danimal said on 17/Aug/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 16/Aug/11 Triple H is 6ft2.5(189cm) because he's 3in taller than 181-182cm or 5ft11.5ish HBK. HBK WAS 5'11" in his prime (same height as Bret Hart). He was even billed this height in the 1980's.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 16/Aug/11 Triple H is 6ft2.5(189cm) because he's 3in taller than 181-182cm or 5ft11.5ish HBK. HBK WAS 5'11" in his prime (same height as Bret Hart). He was even billed this height in the 1980's.
James said on 16/Aug/11
Well he does look shorter than cena these days but yet only looks 1.5 shorter than triple h.... maybe Triple H is more like 6'1-6'1.5 range?
Well he does look shorter than cena these days but yet only looks 1.5 shorter than triple h.... maybe Triple H is more like 6'1-6'1.5 range?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Aug/11
Triple H is 6ft2.5(189cm) because he's 3in taller than 181-182cm or 5ft11.5ish HBK.
Triple H is 6ft2.5(189cm) because he's 3in taller than 181-182cm or 5ft11.5ish HBK.
Mamun said on 16/Aug/11
I can't see this picture !
Regards
SUPERMUN
I can't see this picture !
Regards
SUPERMUN
Danimal said on 15/Aug/11
hs2011 says on 8/Jul/11
Doesn't look over 6'0" flat today and is possibly a smidge under. Looked legit 6'1"+ at his peak, so would've been slightly taller than Cena.
+1
hs2011 says on 8/Jul/11
Doesn't look over 6'0" flat today and is possibly a smidge under. Looked legit 6'1"+ at his peak, so would've been slightly taller than Cena.
+1
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Aug/11
Every bit of 6ft2 in his prime.
Closer to 6ft1 now.
Every bit of 6ft2 in his prime.
Closer to 6ft1 now.
Terryman said on 8/Aug/11
Rob 02:10Click Here onwards thats not half an inch of a difference between vince and Triple h
Rob 02:10Click Here onwards thats not half an inch of a difference between vince and Triple h
James said on 26/Jul/11
If Triple H is still 6'2 then he looked i think maybe 184cm in comparison?
If Triple H is still 6'2 then he looked i think maybe 184cm in comparison?
Vegas said on 19/Jul/11
looking at him next to hhh last night his height loss has been greatly exaggerated on here, measured up to trips exactly like 1995, 97 and 2000
looking at him next to hhh last night his height loss has been greatly exaggerated on here, measured up to trips exactly like 1995, 97 and 2000
James said on 15/Jul/11
is looking under 6ft next to cena
is looking under 6ft next to cena
hs2011 said on 8/Jul/11
Doesn't look over 6'0" flat today and is possibly a smidge under. Looked legit 6'1"+ at his peak, so would've been slightly taller than Cena.
Doesn't look over 6'0" flat today and is possibly a smidge under. Looked legit 6'1"+ at his peak, so would've been slightly taller than Cena.
tell-em said on 8/Jul/11
hes never been over 6'1".
hes never been over 6'1".
Vegas said on 8/Jul/11
whats people estimates on this womans height, 1985, she enters the shot at 1min 15sec Click Here
whats people estimates on this womans height, 1985, she enters the shot at 1min 15sec Click Here
James said on 7/Jul/11
Yep shorter than cena last night.
Maybe 5'11 1/2 next to Cena?
Yep shorter than cena last night.
Maybe 5'11 1/2 next to Cena?
Danimal said on 7/Jul/11
tell-em says on 5/Jul/11
mcmahon looked 5'11" next to john cena last night.
Incredible how much height he's list in the last few years. The man was in the 6'1"-6'2" range up until the 1990's.
tell-em says on 5/Jul/11
mcmahon looked 5'11" next to john cena last night.
Incredible how much height he's list in the last few years. The man was in the 6'1"-6'2" range up until the 1990's.
tell-em said on 5/Jul/11
mcmahon looked 5'11" next to john cena last night.
mcmahon looked 5'11" next to john cena last night.
James said on 3/Jul/11
184cm today
185-186cm prime
184cm today
185-186cm prime
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Jun/11
188cm prime
185-186cm today
188cm prime
185-186cm today
JBJ said on 28/Jun/11
Vince has definitely lost height. He isn't taller than Cena either. There either the same height or Cena is half an inch taller.
Vince has definitely lost height. He isn't taller than Cena either. There either the same height or Cena is half an inch taller.
James said on 26/Jun/11
Shane McMahon 185cm
Steve Austin 184cm
Kurt Angle 178cm
Shane McMahon 185cm
Steve Austin 184cm
Kurt Angle 178cm
Terryman said on 26/Jun/11
1,83.5 meters wore lifts in his earlier career!
1,83.5 meters wore lifts in his earlier career!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/Jun/11
Angle is probably in wrestling boots
Shane McMahon 188cm
Steve Austin 186cm
Jury Angle 178cm
Angle is probably in wrestling boots
Shane McMahon 188cm
Steve Austin 186cm
Jury Angle 178cm
Terryman said on 24/Jun/11
around 2006&2007 when ever vince macman and john cena came face to face there was hardly a difference in height between them!
around 2006&2007 when ever vince macman and john cena came face to face there was hardly a difference in height between them!
James said on 18/Jun/11
go to 2:09 on this video. Shane McMahon looks higher than 182cm next to 178cm Kurt Angle.
Click Here
go to 2:09 on this video. Shane McMahon looks higher than 182cm next to 178cm Kurt Angle.
Click Here
James said on 18/Jun/11
go to 2:09 on this video. Shane McMahon looks higher than 182cm next to 178cm Kurt Angle.
go to 2:09 on this video. Shane McMahon looks higher than 182cm next to 178cm Kurt Angle.
Vegas said on 15/Jun/11
The Ben says on 7/Jun/11
Just saw the final tough enough
Its seems pretty certain that Andy is 6'5
______________
andy played in the nfl and was measured 6'4 6/8th barefoot at the combine Click Here wwe bill him at 6'5, its not like wrestling fans will be able to tell 6'4.75 from 6'5 on tv anyway
The Ben says on 7/Jun/11
Just saw the final tough enough
Its seems pretty certain that Andy is 6'5
______________
andy played in the nfl and was measured 6'4 6/8th barefoot at the combine Click Here wwe bill him at 6'5, its not like wrestling fans will be able to tell 6'4.75 from 6'5 on tv anyway
James said on 15/Jun/11
proportionally even in his prime vince didn't look 6'2. i suspect as well he's a lift wearer cause his height keeps fluctuating all the time
proportionally even in his prime vince didn't look 6'2. i suspect as well he's a lift wearer cause his height keeps fluctuating all the time
Vegas said on 14/Jun/11
Danimal says on 14/Jun/11
Started to lose serious height by the mid 2000's, when HHH appeared to be noticeable taller than McMahon on Larry King
___________
thats march 2000 and hhh is noticeable taller than vince, vince is 54 in this clip Click Here Click Here
1993-94 with shane Click Here
january 1992 and hennig is noticeable taller than vince (hennig was also clearly taller next to gorilla monsoon in 1994 than vince was in 1997 and hennig was clearly shorter than 6'3 nfl listed steve jordan around same time), 40secs Click Here
Danimal says on 14/Jun/11
Started to lose serious height by the mid 2000's, when HHH appeared to be noticeable taller than McMahon on Larry King
___________
thats march 2000 and hhh is noticeable taller than vince, vince is 54 in this clip Click Here Click Here
1993-94 with shane Click Here
january 1992 and hennig is noticeable taller than vince (hennig was also clearly taller next to gorilla monsoon in 1994 than vince was in 1997 and hennig was clearly shorter than 6'3 nfl listed steve jordan around same time), 40secs Click Here
Danimal said on 14/Jun/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 11/Jun/11
I think Vince is still around 6ft1 at age 64...it has a been a good few years since I watched wrestling and Vince still looked a fair bit taller than guys like John Cena and HBK.
In earlier years he looked taller than Steve Austin and similiar to Triple H and Shane McMahon so I've no problem believing he was 6ft2 at one point.
Started to lose serious height by the mid 2000's, when HHH appeared to be noticeable taller than McMahon on Larry King, where as in the 1990's, they were the same height.. McMahon stood his ground well with tall men until the new millennium.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 11/Jun/11
I think Vince is still around 6ft1 at age 64...it has a been a good few years since I watched wrestling and Vince still looked a fair bit taller than guys like John Cena and HBK.
In earlier years he looked taller than Steve Austin and similiar to Triple H and Shane McMahon so I've no problem believing he was 6ft2 at one point.
Started to lose serious height by the mid 2000's, when HHH appeared to be noticeable taller than McMahon on Larry King, where as in the 1990's, they were the same height.. McMahon stood his ground well with tall men until the new millennium.
Danimal said on 14/Jun/11
Alex says on 11/Jun/11
I can buy 6'1 1/2 peak. He was always a bit taller than Austin in the late 90s from what I remember? Today looks 6'0-6'0 1/2
I can go as high as 6'2" in the 1970's/1980's. By the 1990's, he was still over 6'1".. Today he looks to be around 6'0".
Alex says on 11/Jun/11
I can buy 6'1 1/2 peak. He was always a bit taller than Austin in the late 90s from what I remember? Today looks 6'0-6'0 1/2
I can go as high as 6'2" in the 1970's/1980's. By the 1990's, he was still over 6'1".. Today he looks to be around 6'0".
James said on 13/Jun/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 13/Jun/11
Vince McMahon is 6ft1 range now. Probably 185-186cm. At peak he was 188cm
NEVER 188cm at his peak more like 185-186cm. Today he is under 6'1.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 13/Jun/11
Vince McMahon is 6ft1 range now. Probably 185-186cm. At peak he was 188cm
NEVER 188cm at his peak more like 185-186cm. Today he is under 6'1.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Jun/11
Vince McMahon is 6ft1 range now. Probably 185-186cm. At peak he was 188cm
Vince McMahon is 6ft1 range now. Probably 185-186cm. At peak he was 188cm
Vegas said on 13/Jun/11
i think ryan is taller than 6'3, he looked taller in person than batista (though as i said before i was more than 10 feet away from ryan while right next to batista), he was also listed 6'6 on uk gladiators and a good 2 inches taller than brutus magnus whom i have stood next to, magnus looked ~6'3 in person Click Here
would like to see a staredown between barrett and ryan, both men had roughly same height on 6'2 pro bodybuilding listed zeke jackson
i think ryan is taller than 6'3, he looked taller in person than batista (though as i said before i was more than 10 feet away from ryan while right next to batista), he was also listed 6'6 on uk gladiators and a good 2 inches taller than brutus magnus whom i have stood next to, magnus looked ~6'3 in person Click Here
would like to see a staredown between barrett and ryan, both men had roughly same height on 6'2 pro bodybuilding listed zeke jackson
James said on 12/Jun/11
sorry i meant to say mason ryan looks shorter than wade barrett
sorry i meant to say mason ryan looks shorter than wade barrett
James said on 12/Jun/11
Vegas says on 12/Jun/11
james, it depends, the three wrestlers that off my head look bigger in person than on tv are mick foley, rene dupree and eric escobar (who was in wwe for short time in 2009), they are taller in height and bigger in mass than i thought they would be,dupree and escobar are easily the weight they are billed at, on the other hand kane looks bigger on tv (at least mass wise, he can pass for 290-300 on tv) than he does in person, drew mcintyre is another, he looks an average guy on the street mass wise (obviously taller) and not close to his billed 250-260lb in person, i saw mason ryan walking around in a wife beater and he looked like something out of a comic book
How tall do you think Mason Ryan is? 6'3? he looks shorter than drew mcintrye
Vegas says on 12/Jun/11
james, it depends, the three wrestlers that off my head look bigger in person than on tv are mick foley, rene dupree and eric escobar (who was in wwe for short time in 2009), they are taller in height and bigger in mass than i thought they would be,dupree and escobar are easily the weight they are billed at, on the other hand kane looks bigger on tv (at least mass wise, he can pass for 290-300 on tv) than he does in person, drew mcintyre is another, he looks an average guy on the street mass wise (obviously taller) and not close to his billed 250-260lb in person, i saw mason ryan walking around in a wife beater and he looked like something out of a comic book
How tall do you think Mason Ryan is? 6'3? he looks shorter than drew mcintrye
Vegas said on 12/Jun/11
james, it depends, the three wrestlers that off my head look bigger in person than on tv are mick foley, rene dupree and eric escobar (who was in wwe for short time in 2009), they are taller in height and bigger in mass than i thought they would be,dupree and escobar are easily the weight they are billed at, on the other hand kane looks bigger on tv (at least mass wise, he can pass for 290-300 on tv) than he does in person, drew mcintyre is another, he looks an average guy on the street mass wise (obviously taller) and not close to his billed 250-260lb in person, i saw mason ryan walking around in a wife beater and he looked like something out of a comic book
james, it depends, the three wrestlers that off my head look bigger in person than on tv are mick foley, rene dupree and eric escobar (who was in wwe for short time in 2009), they are taller in height and bigger in mass than i thought they would be,dupree and escobar are easily the weight they are billed at, on the other hand kane looks bigger on tv (at least mass wise, he can pass for 290-300 on tv) than he does in person, drew mcintyre is another, he looks an average guy on the street mass wise (obviously taller) and not close to his billed 250-260lb in person, i saw mason ryan walking around in a wife beater and he looked like something out of a comic book
Alex said on 11/Jun/11
I can buy 6'1 1/2 peak. He was always a bit taller than Austin in the late 90s from what I remember? Today looks 6'0-6'0 1/2
I can buy 6'1 1/2 peak. He was always a bit taller than Austin in the late 90s from what I remember? Today looks 6'0-6'0 1/2
James said on 11/Jun/11
Vegas says on 11/Jun/11
James says on 10/Jun/11
looks 5'10.5 (179cm) today
_______
maybe these guys are made of wax and are melting under the hot tv lights, rock has shrunk, big show, vince down to 5'10, james look at the photo i posted of vince and legit 6'4 dan marino on 7/Apr/11 and thats feb 2011, then look at the video i posted day before with shawn michaels and thats april 2011, i would bet vince isn't below 6ft as of right now
Okay fine Vegas. It's just the impression he gives off so i am probably wrong about Vince's height. I am guessing wrestlers probably appear taller in real life than they do on TV?
Vegas says on 11/Jun/11
James says on 10/Jun/11
looks 5'10.5 (179cm) today
_______
maybe these guys are made of wax and are melting under the hot tv lights, rock has shrunk, big show, vince down to 5'10, james look at the photo i posted of vince and legit 6'4 dan marino on 7/Apr/11 and thats feb 2011, then look at the video i posted day before with shawn michaels and thats april 2011, i would bet vince isn't below 6ft as of right now
Okay fine Vegas. It's just the impression he gives off so i am probably wrong about Vince's height. I am guessing wrestlers probably appear taller in real life than they do on TV?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/Jun/11
I think Vince is still around 6ft1 at age 64...it has a been a good few years since I watched wrestling and Vince still looked a fair bit taller than guys like John Cena and HBK.
In earlier years he looked taller than Steve Austin and similiar to Triple H and Shane McMahon so I've no problem believing he was 6ft2 at one point.
I think Vince is still around 6ft1 at age 64...it has a been a good few years since I watched wrestling and Vince still looked a fair bit taller than guys like John Cena and HBK.
In earlier years he looked taller than Steve Austin and similiar to Triple H and Shane McMahon so I've no problem believing he was 6ft2 at one point.
Vegas said on 11/Jun/11
James says on 10/Jun/11
looks 5'10.5 (179cm) today
_______
maybe these guys are made of wax and are melting under the hot tv lights, rock has shrunk, big show, vince down to 5'10, james look at the photo i posted of vince and legit 6'4 dan marino on 7/Apr/11 and thats feb 2011, then look at the video i posted day before with shawn michaels and thats april 2011, i would bet vince isn't below 6ft as of right now
James says on 10/Jun/11
looks 5'10.5 (179cm) today
_______
maybe these guys are made of wax and are melting under the hot tv lights, rock has shrunk, big show, vince down to 5'10, james look at the photo i posted of vince and legit 6'4 dan marino on 7/Apr/11 and thats feb 2011, then look at the video i posted day before with shawn michaels and thats april 2011, i would bet vince isn't below 6ft as of right now
Brad said on 10/Jun/11
How does his body survive after massive steroid injections starting in your 40's?
How does his body survive after massive steroid injections starting in your 40's?
James said on 10/Jun/11
looks 5'10.5 (179cm) today. Not sure about his peak?
looks 5'10.5 (179cm) today. Not sure about his peak?
Vegas said on 9/Jun/11
James says on 8/Jun/11
that his body looks worn out cause of all the wrestling injuries he has sustained in his carrier.
___________
what wrestling injuries?? vince wrestled only a few matches, i would bet under 50 in total from 1999 to 2010 and that includes tag matches, vinces name is nowhere to be found on the list of guys who wrestled the most matches in wwf/e from 1980 to 2009 so its pretty clear he wrestled less than bobby lashleys 270 matches Click Here
any major injuries vince suffered didn't happen during a match, he tore both his quads climbing into the ring to resolve the 2005 rumble winner e.g, if you are in a match with the boss you are going to be extra careful not to hurt him
James says on 8/Jun/11
that his body looks worn out cause of all the wrestling injuries he has sustained in his carrier.
___________
what wrestling injuries?? vince wrestled only a few matches, i would bet under 50 in total from 1999 to 2010 and that includes tag matches, vinces name is nowhere to be found on the list of guys who wrestled the most matches in wwf/e from 1980 to 2009 so its pretty clear he wrestled less than bobby lashleys 270 matches Click Here
any major injuries vince suffered didn't happen during a match, he tore both his quads climbing into the ring to resolve the 2005 rumble winner e.g, if you are in a match with the boss you are going to be extra careful not to hurt him
Danimal said on 9/Jun/11
The Ben says on 7/Jun/11
Just saw the final tough enough and Vince looked shorter than 6ft Luke robinson.
Austin Looked 6'1 but vince looked 5'11.
Its seems pretty certain that Andy is 6'5
Vince consistently looked 6'1"-6'2" in his prime.. He has lost serious height (minimum 2") and I don't think it's all due to age (mid 60's).
The Ben says on 7/Jun/11
Just saw the final tough enough and Vince looked shorter than 6ft Luke robinson.
Austin Looked 6'1 but vince looked 5'11.
Its seems pretty certain that Andy is 6'5
Vince consistently looked 6'1"-6'2" in his prime.. He has lost serious height (minimum 2") and I don't think it's all due to age (mid 60's).
tell-em said on 8/Jun/11
marino must be 6'3" cuz vince aint 6'1"
"
marino must be 6'3" cuz vince aint 6'1"
"
James said on 8/Jun/11
I know this sounds crazy but these days Vince can look under 6ft like 5'11.
only 5 years vince looked taller and more muscular than he does now in 2011 and you can tell by looking at him that his body looks worn out cause of all the wrestling injuries he has sustained in his carrier.
Personally i find 6'1.5 very hard to buy for Vince even at his peak. Maybe in lifts he would be that tall?
I know this sounds crazy but these days Vince can look under 6ft like 5'11.
only 5 years vince looked taller and more muscular than he does now in 2011 and you can tell by looking at him that his body looks worn out cause of all the wrestling injuries he has sustained in his carrier.
Personally i find 6'1.5 very hard to buy for Vince even at his peak. Maybe in lifts he would be that tall?
The Ben said on 7/Jun/11
Just saw the final tough enough and Vince looked shorter than 6ft Luke robinson.
Austin Looked 6'1 but vince looked 5'11.
Its seems pretty certain that Andy is 6'5
Just saw the final tough enough and Vince looked shorter than 6ft Luke robinson.
Austin Looked 6'1 but vince looked 5'11.
Its seems pretty certain that Andy is 6'5
Danimal said on 6/Jun/11
Cranberries (6 ft. 3.25 evening, 17 years) says on 19/May/11
Why does everyone seem to think that Randy Orton is 6'4.5"? Why on Earth would they underbill him? My guess is he's between 6'3" and 6'4", closer to 6'3".
I agree
Cranberries (6 ft. 3.25 evening, 17 years) says on 19/May/11
Why does everyone seem to think that Randy Orton is 6'4.5"? Why on Earth would they underbill him? My guess is he's between 6'3" and 6'4", closer to 6'3".
I agree
James said on 6/Jun/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 3/Jun/11
Cena wears 4cm converses which is the reason he'd look similiar to guys like Triple H and Shane McMahon
Barefoot 184-185cm
Converses 188-189cm
Does he wear them all the time? You don't for sure that cena is wearing 4cm converse in the video with shane.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 3/Jun/11
Cena wears 4cm converses which is the reason he'd look similiar to guys like Triple H and Shane McMahon
Barefoot 184-185cm
Converses 188-189cm
Does he wear them all the time? You don't for sure that cena is wearing 4cm converse in the video with shane.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Jun/11
Cena wears 4cm converses which is the reason he'd look similiar to guys like Triple H and Shane McMahon
Barefoot 184-185cm
Converses 188-189cm
Cena wears 4cm converses which is the reason he'd look similiar to guys like Triple H and Shane McMahon
Barefoot 184-185cm
Converses 188-189cm
James said on 1/Jun/11
can't deny cena and shane looks similar in height. hardly anything at all between them.
can't deny cena and shane looks similar in height. hardly anything at all between them.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Jun/11
If Shane is only 184cm, then Vince is 182cm max maybe even 181cm
If Shane is only 184cm, then Vince is 182cm max maybe even 181cm
James said on 31/May/11
i have watched the clips Shane looks no taller than 185cm maybe even 184cm.
i have watched the clips Shane looks no taller than 185cm maybe even 184cm.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/May/11
You check the clips, James he's a solid 6ft2
You check the clips, James he's a solid 6ft2
James said on 26/May/11
Sorry Shane is not much over 6'0
Sorry Shane is not much over 6'0
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/May/11
If he's taller than his dad, and similiar to Triple H then he must be over 6"1 James
If he's taller than his dad, and similiar to Triple H then he must be over 6"1 James
James said on 22/May/11
Orton looks 6'2/6'3 to me.
Vince looks similar in height to cena so no more than 6' for him today.
Orton looks 6'2/6'3 to me.
Vince looks similar in height to cena so no more than 6' for him today.
Vegas said on 20/May/11
thats the tallest i have ever seen vince look and thats feb of 2011, marino is a legit 6'4 Click Here marino and 6'5.5 barefoot measured jason taylor Click Here
there is vinces footwear to put tellem mind at ease, they ain't cowboys Click Here
thats the tallest i have ever seen vince look and thats feb of 2011, marino is a legit 6'4 Click Here marino and 6'5.5 barefoot measured jason taylor Click Here
there is vinces footwear to put tellem mind at ease, they ain't cowboys Click Here
Cranberries (6 ft. 3.25 evening, 17 years) said on 19/May/11
Why does everyone seem to think that Randy Orton is 6'4.5"? Why on Earth would they underbill him? My guess is he's between 6'3" and 6'4", closer to 6'3".
Why does everyone seem to think that Randy Orton is 6'4.5"? Why on Earth would they underbill him? My guess is he's between 6'3" and 6'4", closer to 6'3".
James said on 18/May/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 17/May/11
Shane McMahon and Triple H look pretty evenly matched heightwise. Both look around 2 inches taller than 6"0.5(184cm) John Cena. So they're both between 6"2 and 6"3.
Vince McMahon was 6"2 at his peak if you at old clips of him beside Steve Austin.
Wrong Shane is not over 6'1.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 17/May/11
Shane McMahon and Triple H look pretty evenly matched heightwise. Both look around 2 inches taller than 6"0.5(184cm) John Cena. So they're both between 6"2 and 6"3.
Vince McMahon was 6"2 at his peak if you at old clips of him beside Steve Austin.
Wrong Shane is not over 6'1.
Vegas said on 18/May/11
hhh is taller than shane and has always been taller than shane, hhh was 1.5 inches taller than vince in 1996, trips 6'2, shane 6'1 and vince 6'0.5 peak (today maybe 6ft flat) Click Here
hhh is taller than shane and has always been taller than shane, hhh was 1.5 inches taller than vince in 1996, trips 6'2, shane 6'1 and vince 6'0.5 peak (today maybe 6ft flat) Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/May/11
Shane McMahon and Triple H look pretty evenly matched heightwise. Both look around 2 inches taller than 6"0.5(184cm) John Cena. So they're both between 6"2 and 6"3.
Vince McMahon was 6"2 at his peak if you at old clips of him beside Steve Austin.
Shane McMahon and Triple H look pretty evenly matched heightwise. Both look around 2 inches taller than 6"0.5(184cm) John Cena. So they're both between 6"2 and 6"3.
Vince McMahon was 6"2 at his peak if you at old clips of him beside Steve Austin.
James said on 15/May/11
Okay 6'2 (188cm) for Triple H maybe not 187cm
Okay 6'2 (188cm) for Triple H maybe not 187cm
James said on 13/May/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 11/May/11
Shane McMahon is 6"2/6"2.5 I'd say...around the same as Triple H
Look at him in the video compared to John Cena that i posted on the 9th of May..... if thats a 1.5-2 inch difference then i am a monkeys uncle.
So
John Cena 6'0.25 (184cm)
Shane McMahon 6'1 (185cm)
Triple H 6'1.5 (187cm)
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 11/May/11
Shane McMahon is 6"2/6"2.5 I'd say...around the same as Triple H
Look at him in the video compared to John Cena that i posted on the 9th of May..... if thats a 1.5-2 inch difference then i am a monkeys uncle.
So
John Cena 6'0.25 (184cm)
Shane McMahon 6'1 (185cm)
Triple H 6'1.5 (187cm)
tell-em said on 13/May/11
triple h is a strong 6'2". nothing under 6'2".
triple h is a strong 6'2". nothing under 6'2".
Vegas said on 12/May/11
shanes shorter than hhh, he is shorter in that video i posted from 1999 and he is shorter than hhh in the hollywood walk of fame ceremony in march 2008
shanes shorter than hhh, he is shorter in that video i posted from 1999 and he is shorter than hhh in the hollywood walk of fame ceremony in march 2008
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/May/11
Shane McMahon is 6"2/6"2.5 I'd say...around the same as Triple H
Shane McMahon is 6"2/6"2.5 I'd say...around the same as Triple H
tell-em said on 10/May/11
shane was never 6'2". 6'1" yes. vince was a weak 6'1" peak.
shane was never 6'2". 6'1" yes. vince was a weak 6'1" peak.
hs2011 said on 10/May/11
Road Warrior Animal claims 6'1" in his autobiography and says he was the same height as Vince McMahon in 1985.
Road Warrior Animal claims 6'1" in his autobiography and says he was the same height as Vince McMahon in 1985.
James said on 9/May/11
I don't think Shane is 6'2 at all more like 6'1
here with 184cm john cena
Click Here
So Shane is probably 6ft1 (185cm)
I don't think Shane is 6'2 at all more like 6'1
here with 184cm john cena
Click Here
So Shane is probably 6ft1 (185cm)
Vegas said on 4/May/11
if vince was 6'2 in the 1990s then hhh was over 6'3, shane edged out vince in the 90s and he never been billed more than 6'2, you see trips, vince and shane side by side here in 1999 Click Here
btw with the high camera angle viscera looks over 7ft in some of the wide shots directly behind vince, shows how much of a role the camera angle plays
if vince was 6'2 in the 1990s then hhh was over 6'3, shane edged out vince in the 90s and he never been billed more than 6'2, you see trips, vince and shane side by side here in 1999 Click Here
btw with the high camera angle viscera looks over 7ft in some of the wide shots directly behind vince, shows how much of a role the camera angle plays
James said on 4/May/11
i'd say 184cm maybe today?
i'd say 184cm maybe today?
tell-em said on 3/May/11
lol. vince wasn't taller than 6'0.5-6'1" roddy piper. they were the same height. go watch piper's dvd. they were identical height.
lol. vince wasn't taller than 6'0.5-6'1" roddy piper. they were the same height. go watch piper's dvd. they were identical height.
Danimal said on 2/May/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 1/May/11
He might be 6"1 flat today..
Looks to have lost significant height since the 1990's.. He used to be taller than 6'1"+ Roddy Piper (in Roddy's prime).. Today, he looks to be a little over 6'0"..
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 1/May/11
He might be 6"1 flat today..
Looks to have lost significant height since the 1990's.. He used to be taller than 6'1"+ Roddy Piper (in Roddy's prime).. Today, he looks to be a little over 6'0"..
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/May/11
He might be 6"1 flat today..
He might be 6"1 flat today..
tell-em said on 30/Apr/11
i agree with dicksock.
i agree with dicksock.
Viper said on 29/Apr/11
LOL, dicksock you are hillarious. 6-4.5 for Randy Orton and 6-2.5 for HHH is loony tunes stuff.
LOL, dicksock you are hillarious. 6-4.5 for Randy Orton and 6-2.5 for HHH is loony tunes stuff.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Apr/11
Randy Orton 6"4.5(194cm)
Edge 6"3.5(192cm)
Triple H 6"2.5(189cm)
Randy Orton 6"4.5(194cm)
Edge 6"3.5(192cm)
Triple H 6"2.5(189cm)
dicksock said on 24/Apr/11
James says on 24/Apr/11
LOL HHH is not 6'3 he's 1.5 inches shorter than 192cm Randy Orton.
You can "lol" all you want you ignorant troll. Randy Orton is at least 6'4.5" and HHH is at least 6'2.5". Orton is most likely a tad under 6'5" and HHH is right around 6'3".
James says on 24/Apr/11
LOL HHH is not 6'3 he's 1.5 inches shorter than 192cm Randy Orton.
You can "lol" all you want you ignorant troll. Randy Orton is at least 6'4.5" and HHH is at least 6'2.5". Orton is most likely a tad under 6'5" and HHH is right around 6'3".
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/Apr/11
I'd say Vince McMahon at his peak would only have been 1cm shorter than Triple H...
Triple H 189cm
Vince McMahon 188cm(peak)
I'd say Vince McMahon at his peak would only have been 1cm shorter than Triple H...
Triple H 189cm
Vince McMahon 188cm(peak)
James said on 24/Apr/11
LOL HHH is not 6'3 he's 1.5 inches shorter than 192cm Randy Orton.
LOL HHH is not 6'3 he's 1.5 inches shorter than 192cm Randy Orton.
dicksock said on 21/Apr/11
I just don't get how Rob has Vince at 6'1.5" and HHH at 6'2". There is obviously more than half an inch between them. Vince should be listed at 6' now and 6'1" max for his peak height. HHH should be listed at 6'3".
I just don't get how Rob has Vince at 6'1.5" and HHH at 6'2". There is obviously more than half an inch between them. Vince should be listed at 6' now and 6'1" max for his peak height. HHH should be listed at 6'3".
Viper said on 15/Apr/11
LOL at 6-1.5 now. That was his peak
LOL at 6-1.5 now. That was his peak
James said on 14/Apr/11
Vince can look just under 6'0 these days
Vince can look just under 6'0 these days
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Apr/11
Would 6"2(188cm) peak and 6"1.5(187cm) be plausible, Rob?
Editor Rob
Would 6"2(188cm) peak and 6"1.5(187cm) be plausible, Rob?
Editor Rob there is a good chance he's lost a cm in height, whether 6ft 2 peak I'm not as sure of.
tell-em said on 9/Apr/11
vince is in cowboy boots and closer to the camera.
vince is in cowboy boots and closer to the camera.
James said on 8/Apr/11
Shawn Michaels has not been 182cm since 1998 when he injured himself at Wrestlemania.
So it makes sense today possibly.....
Vince McMahon 6'0 (183cm)
Shawn Michaels 5'11 (180cm)
Shawn Michaels has not been 182cm since 1998 when he injured himself at Wrestlemania.
So it makes sense today possibly.....
Vince McMahon 6'0 (183cm)
Shawn Michaels 5'11 (180cm)
Vegas said on 4/Apr/11
vince and shawn saturday night Click Here
thats John Laurinaitis who gives vince the ring, by all accounts ~6'3 from people who have met him
vince and shawn saturday night Click Here
thats John Laurinaitis who gives vince the ring, by all accounts ~6'3 from people who have met him
James said on 30/Mar/11
6' 1/2 today and 6'1 flat peak
6' 1/2 today and 6'1 flat peak
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Mar/11
Rob could Vince be 6ft1 flat nowadays and 6ft2 peak?
Editor Rob
Rob could Vince be 6ft1 flat nowadays and 6ft2 peak?
Editor Rob he could be half an inch shorter today than whatever he was 20 years ago.
Mike... said on 23/Mar/11
...this si precisely why most comments on this site are to be taken with a grain of salt. 2 people say he's nowhere near 6'1, but then go on to say maybe he's 6'0. 6'0 is nowhere near 6'1?? Newsflash; It's a couple pairs of gel inserts away from 6'1. lol
...this si precisely why most comments on this site are to be taken with a grain of salt. 2 people say he's nowhere near 6'1, but then go on to say maybe he's 6'0. 6'0 is nowhere near 6'1?? Newsflash; It's a couple pairs of gel inserts away from 6'1. lol
Viper said on 23/Mar/11
Mexican Mentor list actually had Billy Gunn at 6-2 James.
Mexican Mentor list actually had Billy Gunn at 6-2 James.
Viper said on 23/Mar/11
He might be 5-11 now If hes the same height as Bret Hart and Shawn Michaels
He might be 5-11 now If hes the same height as Bret Hart and Shawn Michaels
dicksock said on 23/Mar/11
miko says on 18/Mar/11
Vince is knowhere near 6"1 in 2011. He looked the same height as Bret Hart and Shawn Michaels last year. I'd put him at 6"0. Maybe 6"1 peak.
I agree.
miko says on 18/Mar/11
Vince is knowhere near 6"1 in 2011. He looked the same height as Bret Hart and Shawn Michaels last year. I'd put him at 6"0. Maybe 6"1 peak.
I agree.
miko said on 18/Mar/11
Vince is knowhere near 6"1 in 2011. He looked the same height as Bret Hart and Shawn Michaels last year. I'd put him at 6"0. Maybe 6"1 peak.
Vince is knowhere near 6"1 in 2011. He looked the same height as Bret Hart and Shawn Michaels last year. I'd put him at 6"0. Maybe 6"1 peak.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Mar/11
Looking 185cm now
Looking 185cm now
James said on 22/Feb/11
Vegas i have always wondered how tall billy gunn was? He is listed down at 6'5 (196cm) but i think he's 6'3 or 6'4 at most.
Vegas i have always wondered how tall billy gunn was? He is listed down at 6'5 (196cm) but i think he's 6'3 or 6'4 at most.
Frank said on 21/Feb/11
Too me Vince looks alittle taller than Arnold
Too me Vince looks alittle taller than Arnold
Vegas said on 21/Feb/11
vince was about the same height as arnie 12 years ago on smackdown though it looks like arnie has the footwear advantage because he is in boots, rock had arnie by about 2 inches on the same show Click Here
i used to have a number of photos backstage from that show, billy gunn had arnie by about 4 inches, hhh was taller than arnie
vince was about the same height as arnie 12 years ago on smackdown though it looks like arnie has the footwear advantage because he is in boots, rock had arnie by about 2 inches on the same show Click Here
i used to have a number of photos backstage from that show, billy gunn had arnie by about 4 inches, hhh was taller than arnie
James said on 20/Feb/11
Could be 183cm these days? Looks very similar in build and height to Arnold Schwazzenegger.
Could be 183cm these days? Looks very similar in build and height to Arnold Schwazzenegger.
dicksock said on 19/Feb/11
James says on 13/Feb/11
Vince looks 6'1 at most with the rock
That's because he was 6'1" at the most and more likely in the 6' range.
James says on 13/Feb/11
Vince looks 6'1 at most with the rock
That's because he was 6'1" at the most and more likely in the 6' range.
James said on 13/Feb/11
Vince looks 6'1 at most with the rock
Vince looks 6'1 at most with the rock
miko said on 13/Feb/11
Vince is lucky if he's over 6"0 today, was the same height as Bret Hart last year.
Vince is lucky if he's over 6"0 today, was the same height as Bret Hart last year.
Vegas said on 13/Feb/11
rock and vince about 10-11 years ago, i see a solid 2 inches there at 35secs on ward Click Here
rock and vince about 10-11 years ago, i see a solid 2 inches there at 35secs on ward Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Feb/11
188cm peak...around 185-186cm now though
188cm peak...around 185-186cm now though
Vegas said on 11/Feb/11
barrett sure looks a solid 6'5 on tv, he was easily 2 inches taller than sheamus, had a full head on mene gene, 3 inches taller than 6'3 college football listed alex riley, 3 inches easy on 6'2 pro-bodybuilding listed Ezekiel Jackson and looked just as tall next to chris jericho as ~6'5 barefoot big ben roethlisberger did
barrett sure looks a solid 6'5 on tv, he was easily 2 inches taller than sheamus, had a full head on mene gene, 3 inches taller than 6'3 college football listed alex riley, 3 inches easy on 6'2 pro-bodybuilding listed Ezekiel Jackson and looked just as tall next to chris jericho as ~6'5 barefoot big ben roethlisberger did
Anonymous said on 11/Feb/11
Vince peak height was 186 cms and his son is 187 cms. Wade Barrett is 192-193 cm
Vince peak height was 186 cms and his son is 187 cms. Wade Barrett is 192-193 cm
James said on 7/Feb/11
Yeah 6' is a realy possiblitly for Vince today.
Yeah 6' is a realy possiblitly for Vince today.
Viper said on 2/Feb/11
Vince did look 6-1.5 with Frank and he was supposedly wearing thin loafers. Either way hes looking 6-0 max today, and sometimes maybe a hair under that.
Vince did look 6-1.5 with Frank and he was supposedly wearing thin loafers. Either way hes looking 6-0 max today, and sometimes maybe a hair under that.
dicksock said on 23/Jan/11
Vegas says on 23/Jan/11
rampage shane never looked 6'3 next to hhh, in 1999 hhh in sneakers was clearly taller than a dress-shoe wearing shane
correct dicksock, between 1980 and 2010 bret wrestled more matches than any other wrestler despite the fact that he has been retired over 10 years, he wrestled over 2400 matches for wwf alone between 1984 and 1997, undertaker is the only other guy to wrestle at least 2000 matches since bret debuted in wwf, to put that into perspective hulk hogan only wrestled 1400 matches for wwf/e in all his time there, but yet bret despite being in bad shape still looks the same height today that he did back in the mid 80s
Yes, and don't forget the hundreds of matches he had pre 1980 in Stampede Wrestling. And his matches were basically the most intense/fast pace for his era.
Vegas says on 23/Jan/11
rampage shane never looked 6'3 next to hhh, in 1999 hhh in sneakers was clearly taller than a dress-shoe wearing shane
correct dicksock, between 1980 and 2010 bret wrestled more matches than any other wrestler despite the fact that he has been retired over 10 years, he wrestled over 2400 matches for wwf alone between 1984 and 1997, undertaker is the only other guy to wrestle at least 2000 matches since bret debuted in wwf, to put that into perspective hulk hogan only wrestled 1400 matches for wwf/e in all his time there, but yet bret despite being in bad shape still looks the same height today that he did back in the mid 80s
Yes, and don't forget the hundreds of matches he had pre 1980 in Stampede Wrestling. And his matches were basically the most intense/fast pace for his era.
Vegas said on 23/Jan/11
rampage shane never looked 6'3 next to hhh, in 1999 hhh in sneakers was clearly taller than a dress-shoe wearing shane
correct dicksock, between 1980 and 2010 bret wrestled more matches than any other wrestler despite the fact that he has been retired over 10 years, he wrestled over 2400 matches for wwf alone between 1984 and 1997, undertaker is the only other guy to wrestle at least 2000 matches since bret debuted in wwf, to put that into perspective hulk hogan only wrestled 1400 matches for wwf/e in all his time there, but yet bret despite being in bad shape still looks the same height today that he did back in the mid 80s
rampage shane never looked 6'3 next to hhh, in 1999 hhh in sneakers was clearly taller than a dress-shoe wearing shane
correct dicksock, between 1980 and 2010 bret wrestled more matches than any other wrestler despite the fact that he has been retired over 10 years, he wrestled over 2400 matches for wwf alone between 1984 and 1997, undertaker is the only other guy to wrestle at least 2000 matches since bret debuted in wwf, to put that into perspective hulk hogan only wrestled 1400 matches for wwf/e in all his time there, but yet bret despite being in bad shape still looks the same height today that he did back in the mid 80s
dicksock said on 23/Jan/11
Danimal says on 21/Jan/11
Here we have a 6'1"+ Vince McMahon in 1997 with 5'11" Bret Hart. This goes to show how much height Vince has lost since the 1990's (and he was already in his early 50's here). Watch at 3:53 onwards: Click Here
You can't use that video to compare heights. Vince is way closer to the camera. When Bret came back to the WWE, he and Vince were the same height. Why would Vince have lost height? He has always been in great shape and has never wrestled even a part time schedule. Bret on the other hand wrestled his butt off as much as anyone in wrestling for over 20 years and has been plagued with health problems. But Vince has lost more height than him?! What a joke. According to your logic, Vince should be a solid 6' and Bret should be a weak 5'10" at best. That is just absurd. Bret and Vince were both in the 6' range in their primes and are still very close to that height.
Danimal says on 21/Jan/11
Here we have a 6'1"+ Vince McMahon in 1997 with 5'11" Bret Hart. This goes to show how much height Vince has lost since the 1990's (and he was already in his early 50's here). Watch at 3:53 onwards: Click Here
You can't use that video to compare heights. Vince is way closer to the camera. When Bret came back to the WWE, he and Vince were the same height. Why would Vince have lost height? He has always been in great shape and has never wrestled even a part time schedule. Bret on the other hand wrestled his butt off as much as anyone in wrestling for over 20 years and has been plagued with health problems. But Vince has lost more height than him?! What a joke. According to your logic, Vince should be a solid 6' and Bret should be a weak 5'10" at best. That is just absurd. Bret and Vince were both in the 6' range in their primes and are still very close to that height.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 22/Jan/11
The WWE claim him to be 6"3 which is absurd...but I do agree with 6"2
His son Shane could be close to 6"3 though
The WWE claim him to be 6"3 which is absurd...but I do agree with 6"2
His son Shane could be close to 6"3 though
tell-em said on 21/Jan/11
vince was only 52, he hadn't lost anything. of course 6'0" vince is gonna look taller than a 6'0" bret hart when hes closer to the camera.
vince was only 52, he hadn't lost anything. of course 6'0" vince is gonna look taller than a 6'0" bret hart when hes closer to the camera.
Danimal said on 21/Jan/11
Here we have a 6'1"+ Vince McMahon in 1997 with 5'11" Bret Hart. This goes to show how much height Vince has lost since the 1990's (and he was already in his early 50's here). Watch at 3:53 onwards: Click Here
Here we have a 6'1"+ Vince McMahon in 1997 with 5'11" Bret Hart. This goes to show how much height Vince has lost since the 1990's (and he was already in his early 50's here). Watch at 3:53 onwards: Click Here
Vegas said on 10/Jan/11
i know gonzales is closer to the camera but the height difference between monsoon and gonzales there is massive, alot of people on here thought monsoon was 6'6 legit when i started here, have to laugh at heenan just staring up at gonzales the whole time in awe
i know gonzales is closer to the camera but the height difference between monsoon and gonzales there is massive, alot of people on here thought monsoon was 6'6 legit when i started here, have to laugh at heenan just staring up at gonzales the whole time in awe
dicksock said on 10/Jan/11
Here is a video from 1993:
Click Here
Pause at 2:08 and you can see about 2" bewteen 5'10" Jerry Lawler and Vince McMahon. There looks to be no more than 2" between them throughout the video. If you take away his poofy hair, he looks about 3" shorter than 6'3" Lex Luger. He looks a little shorter than 6' Macho Man, though Randy was probably wearing cowboy boots. If you pause at 9:13, you can clearly see 6' Bret Hart and Vince looking the same height. At 11:00, Bret looks a little bit taller. But, he was a bit closer to the camera. Also, in the second part of this video, you can see Gorilla Monsoon was no more than 5" taller than 5'11" max Bobby Heenan.
Rob, I urge you to take a look at this evidence. I don't see how you can have Vince McMahon at 6'1.5" and Bret Hart at 6'. I've already posted proof of Stone Cold CLEARLY looking taller than Vince. Here it is again though:
Click Here
If you pause at 4:25, there is a great shot of Austin looking 3" taller than McMahon! Now I'm not saying Austin is 6'1" and Vince is 5'10". I'm saying I have a very hard time believing that Vince is the taller of the two.
Austin: 6'1"
McMahon: 6'
Bret Hart: 6'
Gorilla Monsoon: 6'4"
Bobby Heenan: 5'11"
Here is a video from 1993:
Click Here
Pause at 2:08 and you can see about 2" bewteen 5'10" Jerry Lawler and Vince McMahon. There looks to be no more than 2" between them throughout the video. If you take away his poofy hair, he looks about 3" shorter than 6'3" Lex Luger. He looks a little shorter than 6' Macho Man, though Randy was probably wearing cowboy boots. If you pause at 9:13, you can clearly see 6' Bret Hart and Vince looking the same height. At 11:00, Bret looks a little bit taller. But, he was a bit closer to the camera. Also, in the second part of this video, you can see Gorilla Monsoon was no more than 5" taller than 5'11" max Bobby Heenan.
Rob, I urge you to take a look at this evidence. I don't see how you can have Vince McMahon at 6'1.5" and Bret Hart at 6'. I've already posted proof of Stone Cold CLEARLY looking taller than Vince. Here it is again though:
Click Here
If you pause at 4:25, there is a great shot of Austin looking 3" taller than McMahon! Now I'm not saying Austin is 6'1" and Vince is 5'10". I'm saying I have a very hard time believing that Vince is the taller of the two.
Austin: 6'1"
McMahon: 6'
Bret Hart: 6'
Gorilla Monsoon: 6'4"
Bobby Heenan: 5'11"
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Dec/10
6"2(188cm) peak
6"1.25(186cm) today
6"2(188cm) peak
6"1.25(186cm) today
Sam Rick said on 23/Dec/10
Vince or anyone who can get a hold of Congratulations you made what seemed as a Barbaric sport a success but I have a few tips of advice as we are in a new decade the leave of superstars such as Shawn Michaels who should be a hall of famer 2011 and Dave Batista hall of famer 2013-2015 and some getting injuries such as you're son-in-law Triple H and the Undertaker you have introduced young talent eg Wade Barrett,Drew McInytre, Daniel Bryan and Kaval.And the rising of young superstars to Fame eg.Kofi Kingston,JOHN MORRISON,and meat heads like the Miz and Dolph Ziggler.BUT I think Triple H should come back at Wrestlemania 27 in an Extreme rules match with Sheamus and send him of a strechter and given at most upto 3 years and retire the Undertaker should make his streak 20-0 but he gets beaten by a young superstar to make it 20-1 and leaves.And I think these superstars should main event
1.SHEAMUS:THE 1ST IRISH BORH WWE CHAMPION AND 2010 KING OF THE RING HE SHOULD BE VILLIAN ON MOST OCCASIONS AND A HERO ON FEW.AND IRELAND WILL HAVE TO WATCH WWE.
2.KOFI KINGSTON-THE 1ST GHANAIAN BORN CHAMPION HOLDER HE HAS BECAME A HERO TO CHILDREN IN THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES TO EXPLOIT THEIR TALENTS AND HAS UNIQUE SYTLES AND AMAZING MIC SKILLS AFRICA(GHANA) WILL HAVE TO WATCH WWE.DEFINITELY HERO (I.C AND USA CHAMP AGAIN THEN WHC or WWE CHAMP).
3.EVAN BOURNE:HE has wowed us will his skills and his looks that for female fans should play a villian on few occasions but hero and could make a good USA AND WWE CHAMP.
4.JOHN MORRISON:JUST LIKE EVAN.
5.JACK SWAGGER:NEVER A FACE AND GIVE HIM A MANAGER AND I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE ALL AMERICAN AMERICAN A USA champ.
6.CODY RHODES:GIVE HIM SINGLES GOLD(MOSTLY USA Champ). A GO FROM HEEL SLOWLY TO A FACE
7.CURT HAWKINS:HERO
8.ZACK RYDES:VILLIAN
9.DANIEL BRYAN:HERO
10.CHRIS MASTERS:HERO AND SOMETIMES VILLIAN
11:YOUSI TATSU:EUROPE-SHEAMUS AFRICA-KOFI KINGSTON ASIA-YOUSI AS THE I.C CHAMP.
12.DOLPH ZIGGLER:WELL I DONOT LIKE HIM SO I CAN'T SAY MUCH.
13.STEPHANIE McMAHON:to rule any brand as a face.
14.SHANE McMAHON:ANY BRAND BUT AS A HEEL
RETURN THE HARDCORE,CRUISERWEIGHT,AND WORLD TAG TEAM TITLES.WELL THIS THE BEST I CAN THINK OF TO MAKE WWE LIGHTYEARS AHEAD OF T.N.A I HOPE YOU LIKE IT AND SUPPORT IT AND FORGIVE SPELLING MISTAKES AND My grammer.
Vince or anyone who can get a hold of Congratulations you made what seemed as a Barbaric sport a success but I have a few tips of advice as we are in a new decade the leave of superstars such as Shawn Michaels who should be a hall of famer 2011 and Dave Batista hall of famer 2013-2015 and some getting injuries such as you're son-in-law Triple H and the Undertaker you have introduced young talent eg Wade Barrett,Drew McInytre, Daniel Bryan and Kaval.And the rising of young superstars to Fame eg.Kofi Kingston,JOHN MORRISON,and meat heads like the Miz and Dolph Ziggler.BUT I think Triple H should come back at Wrestlemania 27 in an Extreme rules match with Sheamus and send him of a strechter and given at most upto 3 years and retire the Undertaker should make his streak 20-0 but he gets beaten by a young superstar to make it 20-1 and leaves.And I think these superstars should main event
1.SHEAMUS:THE 1ST IRISH BORH WWE CHAMPION AND 2010 KING OF THE RING HE SHOULD BE VILLIAN ON MOST OCCASIONS AND A HERO ON FEW.AND IRELAND WILL HAVE TO WATCH WWE.
2.KOFI KINGSTON-THE 1ST GHANAIAN BORN CHAMPION HOLDER HE HAS BECAME A HERO TO CHILDREN IN THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES TO EXPLOIT THEIR TALENTS AND HAS UNIQUE SYTLES AND AMAZING MIC SKILLS AFRICA(GHANA) WILL HAVE TO WATCH WWE.DEFINITELY HERO (I.C AND USA CHAMP AGAIN THEN WHC or WWE CHAMP).
3.EVAN BOURNE:HE has wowed us will his skills and his looks that for female fans should play a villian on few occasions but hero and could make a good USA AND WWE CHAMP.
4.JOHN MORRISON:JUST LIKE EVAN.
5.JACK SWAGGER:NEVER A FACE AND GIVE HIM A MANAGER AND I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE ALL AMERICAN AMERICAN A USA champ.
6.CODY RHODES:GIVE HIM SINGLES GOLD(MOSTLY USA Champ). A GO FROM HEEL SLOWLY TO A FACE
7.CURT HAWKINS:HERO
8.ZACK RYDES:VILLIAN
9.DANIEL BRYAN:HERO
10.CHRIS MASTERS:HERO AND SOMETIMES VILLIAN
11:YOUSI TATSU:EUROPE-SHEAMUS AFRICA-KOFI KINGSTON ASIA-YOUSI AS THE I.C CHAMP.
12.DOLPH ZIGGLER:WELL I DONOT LIKE HIM SO I CAN'T SAY MUCH.
13.STEPHANIE McMAHON:to rule any brand as a face.
14.SHANE McMAHON:ANY BRAND BUT AS A HEEL
RETURN THE HARDCORE,CRUISERWEIGHT,AND WORLD TAG TEAM TITLES.WELL THIS THE BEST I CAN THINK OF TO MAKE WWE LIGHTYEARS AHEAD OF T.N.A I HOPE YOU LIKE IT AND SUPPORT IT AND FORGIVE SPELLING MISTAKES AND My grammer.
dicksock said on 15/Dec/10
Danimal says on 29/Nov/10
dicksock says on 29/Nov/10
Lou: 6'4"-6'5"
Vince without lifts: 5'11.5"-6'0.5" with lifts: 6'1"-6'2"
This is when I stopped reading. My God, he was as tall as LEGIT 6'1"-6'2" men in the 1970's and 1980's (Tony Atlas, Bob Backlund, Roddy Piper, etc) and he had NO reason to wear lifts at that time, seeing he was a NOBODY interviewer/commentator (pre-1997). He was 6'1"-6'2" in his younger years and YES, closer to 6'2" than 6'1". As for today, he is shorter. Looks to have lost over an inch since his prime. I peg him at around 6'0" today.
There is zero evidence of him being 6'1.5" much less 6'2". There has been endless amounts of proof of this. You refuse to admit it because you are delusional. I can kind of understand you clinging to 6'1", but 6'2"...give me a break. He is shorter than 6'0.5" max John Cena today. He is about 6' tall max today and was never above the 6' range except when he wore lifts.
Danimal says on 29/Nov/10
dicksock says on 29/Nov/10
Lou: 6'4"-6'5"
Vince without lifts: 5'11.5"-6'0.5" with lifts: 6'1"-6'2"
This is when I stopped reading. My God, he was as tall as LEGIT 6'1"-6'2" men in the 1970's and 1980's (Tony Atlas, Bob Backlund, Roddy Piper, etc) and he had NO reason to wear lifts at that time, seeing he was a NOBODY interviewer/commentator (pre-1997). He was 6'1"-6'2" in his younger years and YES, closer to 6'2" than 6'1". As for today, he is shorter. Looks to have lost over an inch since his prime. I peg him at around 6'0" today.
There is zero evidence of him being 6'1.5" much less 6'2". There has been endless amounts of proof of this. You refuse to admit it because you are delusional. I can kind of understand you clinging to 6'1", but 6'2"...give me a break. He is shorter than 6'0.5" max John Cena today. He is about 6' tall max today and was never above the 6' range except when he wore lifts.
James said on 14/Dec/10
Triple H is not over 6'2.
The way I see it
Triple H 6'2
Vince McMahon 6'0
Triple H is not over 6'2.
The way I see it
Triple H 6'2
Vince McMahon 6'0
Stefan said on 14/Dec/10
Vince is 1,84/85 (6-0,5/0,75) today.
Please, compare with Triple H, Rob. I see 2,5 " difference.
Click Here
Vince is 1,84/85 (6-0,5/0,75) today.
Please, compare with Triple H, Rob. I see 2,5 " difference.
Click Here
James said on 13/Dec/10
Always a chance the NFL guy might be 6'3.5?
Always a chance the NFL guy might be 6'3.5?
Vegas said on 13/Dec/10
james i don't think he was over 6'1
here is curt hennig with 6'3 nfl listed steve jordan early 1990s Click Here jordans listing Click Here
vince with hennig the best part of 20 years ago (january 1992), so vince is mid 40s Click Here
184-85 for his peak and 183-84 for today imo (though i have to admit he looks under 6ft in those photos with big show in afghanistan taken a few days ago), you can't compare vince to a normal average 65 year old male, there are few 60+ year olds that appear on muscle on fitness Click Here
james i don't think he was over 6'1
here is curt hennig with 6'3 nfl listed steve jordan early 1990s Click Here jordans listing Click Here
vince with hennig the best part of 20 years ago (january 1992), so vince is mid 40s Click Here
184-85 for his peak and 183-84 for today imo (though i have to admit he looks under 6ft in those photos with big show in afghanistan taken a few days ago), you can't compare vince to a normal average 65 year old male, there are few 60+ year olds that appear on muscle on fitness Click Here
James said on 12/Dec/10
Well Vegas I would queston 187cm at his peak though. More likely 186cm than 187cm peak. So 184cm now and 6'1.25 peak.
Well Vegas I would queston 187cm at his peak though. More likely 186cm than 187cm peak. So 184cm now and 6'1.25 peak.
Vegas said on 12/Dec/10
Danimal says on 12/Dec/10
He's easily lost at least 1" since his peak height.
_________________
easily?? who are you comparing too?? he looks same height next to hbk in 2010 as in 1993, he looks same height next to bret hart in 2010 as in 1993, he looked same height next to jim duggan in 2009 as back in the 80s, looked same height next to jerry lawler in 2010 as 1993, same height next to a cowboybootless jesse ventura in 2009 as a cowboybootless ventura looked to him in the mid 80s
this is 2006, i can post photos of vince and shane going back to the 80s Click Here
James 183cm is a possibility, 184cm is more likely, but given how well vince looks after himself (this is a guy who is better built than most of the roster) i don't think he lost over an inch, my uncle is roughly ten years older than vince, worked really hard back-breaking labour in his teens/20s, roughly same height as vince, he also keeps himself in great shape, i hadn't seen him for 5-6 years till recently and he has lost barely anything
Danimal says on 12/Dec/10
He's easily lost at least 1" since his peak height.
_________________
easily?? who are you comparing too?? he looks same height next to hbk in 2010 as in 1993, he looks same height next to bret hart in 2010 as in 1993, he looked same height next to jim duggan in 2009 as back in the 80s, looked same height next to jerry lawler in 2010 as 1993, same height next to a cowboybootless jesse ventura in 2009 as a cowboybootless ventura looked to him in the mid 80s
this is 2006, i can post photos of vince and shane going back to the 80s Click Here
James 183cm is a possibility, 184cm is more likely, but given how well vince looks after himself (this is a guy who is better built than most of the roster) i don't think he lost over an inch, my uncle is roughly ten years older than vince, worked really hard back-breaking labour in his teens/20s, roughly same height as vince, he also keeps himself in great shape, i hadn't seen him for 5-6 years till recently and he has lost barely anything
Danimal said on 12/Dec/10
He's easily lost at least 1" since his peak height.
He's easily lost at least 1" since his peak height.
James said on 11/Dec/10
well Vince obviously is not 6'1.5 today
Click Here
Vegas do you think 183cm for Vince is a possiblitly nowadays?
well Vince obviously is not 6'1.5 today
Click Here
Vegas do you think 183cm for Vince is a possiblitly nowadays?
Vegas said on 11/Dec/10
James says on 10/Dec/10
6'0.5 (184cm) now
___________________________________
surely you need to upgrade hhh from 6'1.5 then, he was more than an inch taller than vince at the hollywood walk of fame ceremony 3 years ago, he was more than an inch taller than vince nearly 11 years ago on snl, 6 secs onward Click Here
James says on 10/Dec/10
6'0.5 (184cm) now
___________________________________
surely you need to upgrade hhh from 6'1.5 then, he was more than an inch taller than vince at the hollywood walk of fame ceremony 3 years ago, he was more than an inch taller than vince nearly 11 years ago on snl, 6 secs onward Click Here
James said on 10/Dec/10
6'0.5 (184cm) now
6'1.25 (186cm) peak
6'0.5 (184cm) now
6'1.25 (186cm) peak
James said on 9/Dec/10
Frank says on 9/Dec/10
James it was December of 1993
Well he is bound to have shrunk since 1993.
Frank says on 9/Dec/10
James it was December of 1993
Well he is bound to have shrunk since 1993.
Frank said on 9/Dec/10
James it was December of 1993
James it was December of 1993
James said on 8/Dec/10
Frank says on 7/Dec/10
James his shoes looked normal but if he is really 6ft he must of had lifts because he looked close to 2 inches taller than me
What year did you take the pic with him Frank? the 90's? If it was in the 90's then he is probably shrunk now in 2010. I think maybe peak 186cm and today 183-184cm.
Frank says on 7/Dec/10
James his shoes looked normal but if he is really 6ft he must of had lifts because he looked close to 2 inches taller than me
What year did you take the pic with him Frank? the 90's? If it was in the 90's then he is probably shrunk now in 2010. I think maybe peak 186cm and today 183-184cm.
Frank said on 7/Dec/10
James his shoes looked normal but if he is really 6ft he must of had lifts because he looked close to 2 inches taller than me
James his shoes looked normal but if he is really 6ft he must of had lifts because he looked close to 2 inches taller than me
James said on 6/Dec/10
I do remember with Frank Vince looked taller than the listing here but i think frank said he was wearing lifts in his photo?
With the Rock looks 5'11.5 or 6ft.
I do remember with Frank Vince looked taller than the listing here but i think frank said he was wearing lifts in his photo?
With the Rock looks 5'11.5 or 6ft.
James said on 5/Dec/10
nah he looks a little under 6'1 with Donal Trump. he was never 6'2.
nah he looks a little under 6'1 with Donal Trump. he was never 6'2.
Vegas said on 5/Dec/10
from about a decade ago, vince and the rock Click Here
rampage, vince might have hit 6'2 in shoes but not barefoot, curt hennig whom its been proved was under 6'2 himself was taller than vince side by side in dress-shoes in the late 80s/early 1990s
from about a decade ago, vince and the rock Click Here
rampage, vince might have hit 6'2 in shoes but not barefoot, curt hennig whom its been proved was under 6'2 himself was taller than vince side by side in dress-shoes in the late 80s/early 1990s
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Dec/10
Around 6"1 today...
Peaked at 6"2(188cm)
Around 6"1 today...
Peaked at 6"2(188cm)
Vegas said on 2/Dec/10
LEGIT 6'1"-6'2" men such as bob backlund??
backlund was 5'11 range, barely taller than british bulldog in the early 1990s, same height as bret and shawn and shorter than vince, camera angles in the late 70/ early 80s, made him look taller than vince at times like here but that wasn't the case Click Here
LEGIT 6'1"-6'2" men such as bob backlund??
backlund was 5'11 range, barely taller than british bulldog in the early 1990s, same height as bret and shawn and shorter than vince, camera angles in the late 70/ early 80s, made him look taller than vince at times like here but that wasn't the case Click Here
James said on 1/Dec/10
I don't think Vince was over 6'1 at his peak. Today about 6ft even?
I don't think Vince was over 6'1 at his peak. Today about 6ft even?
Frank said on 30/Nov/10
Dibiase must have wore lifts when he wrestled he looked taller than Donald Trump whos atleast 6ft 2
Dibiase must have wore lifts when he wrestled he looked taller than Donald Trump whos atleast 6ft 2
Anonymous said on 29/Nov/10
dibiase and ventura are billed 6'1 and 6'2 respectively Click Here Click Here
dibiase and ventura are billed 6'1 and 6'2 respectively Click Here Click Here
Danimal said on 29/Nov/10
Frank says on 22/Nov/10
Vince looked alittle taller than Arnold.. I know people who met Arnold and some told me he was 5ft 10 and some told me 6ft 1 I believe he wears Lifts
Lou Fereigno was listed @ 6ft 5 and hes about 6ft 2.5
Frank, Arnold couldn't have worn lifts when he was barefoot for years as a professional bodybuilder (that was his peak, not his King of Queens appearances)...
Frank says on 22/Nov/10
Vince looked alittle taller than Arnold.. I know people who met Arnold and some told me he was 5ft 10 and some told me 6ft 1 I believe he wears Lifts
Lou Fereigno was listed @ 6ft 5 and hes about 6ft 2.5
Frank, Arnold couldn't have worn lifts when he was barefoot for years as a professional bodybuilder (that was his peak, not his King of Queens appearances)...
Danimal said on 29/Nov/10
Frank says on 23/Nov/10
Lou is sometimes in that show King Of Queens and i met The Big Black guy who plays Deacon i believe He told me hes 6ft 5 and Lou is Shorter than him so Lou was never 6ft 5
Frank, Lou's appearances on King of Queens in not a young and prime Lou. We have an older Lou who actually looks like he lost height since his prime. I firmly believe he was a shade over 6'4" at his peak and is just shy of 6'3" today.
Frank says on 23/Nov/10
Lou is sometimes in that show King Of Queens and i met The Big Black guy who plays Deacon i believe He told me hes 6ft 5 and Lou is Shorter than him so Lou was never 6ft 5
Frank, Lou's appearances on King of Queens in not a young and prime Lou. We have an older Lou who actually looks like he lost height since his prime. I firmly believe he was a shade over 6'4" at his peak and is just shy of 6'3" today.
Danimal said on 29/Nov/10
dicksock says on 29/Nov/10
Lou: 6'4"-6'5"
Vince without lifts: 5'11.5"-6'0.5" with lifts: 6'1"-6'2"
This is when I stopped reading. My God, he was as tall as LEGIT 6'1"-6'2" men in the 1970's and 1980's (Tony Atlas, Bob Backlund, Roddy Piper, etc) and he had NO reason to wear lifts at that time, seeing he was a NOBODY interviewer/commentator (pre-1997). He was 6'1"-6'2" in his younger years and YES, closer to 6'2" than 6'1". As for today, he is shorter. Looks to have lost over an inch since his prime. I peg him at around 6'0" today.
dicksock says on 29/Nov/10
Lou: 6'4"-6'5"
Vince without lifts: 5'11.5"-6'0.5" with lifts: 6'1"-6'2"
This is when I stopped reading. My God, he was as tall as LEGIT 6'1"-6'2" men in the 1970's and 1980's (Tony Atlas, Bob Backlund, Roddy Piper, etc) and he had NO reason to wear lifts at that time, seeing he was a NOBODY interviewer/commentator (pre-1997). He was 6'1"-6'2" in his younger years and YES, closer to 6'2" than 6'1". As for today, he is shorter. Looks to have lost over an inch since his prime. I peg him at around 6'0" today.
d wade said on 29/Nov/10
this my list to the wreslers real height
Giant gonzales 7,6
Great Khali 7,1
Big show 7,0
Andre the giant6,10
Kevin nash 6,9
Kane 6,8.5
Undertaker 6,7.5
Sid vicious 6,7
Hulk hogan 6,4
scott hall 6,4
Vince 6,0
bret hart 5,11
mean gene 5,6
this my list to the wreslers real height
Giant gonzales 7,6
Great Khali 7,1
Big show 7,0
Andre the giant6,10
Kevin nash 6,9
Kane 6,8.5
Undertaker 6,7.5
Sid vicious 6,7
Hulk hogan 6,4
scott hall 6,4
Vince 6,0
bret hart 5,11
mean gene 5,6
dicksock said on 29/Nov/10
If I had to chooose his height, I guess I'd choose his shortest, which is 6'0". So 6'0" barefoot and around 6'1.5" in his lifts. Lou's dad says he's 6'5", so he was probably around that height. Deacon could be closer to 6'6" and Lou could have lost at least .5". Plus, I've never seen a staredown betweeen them. Lou was never under 6'4".
Lou: 6'4"-6'5"
Vince without lifts: 5'11.5"-6'0.5" with lifts: 6'1"-6'2"
Arnold: 6'1.5"
Hogan: 6'5.5"
Andre: 6'11.5"
Jesse Ventura: 6'3.5"
Jim Duggan: 6'3"
Ted Dibiase: 6'3.5"
Stone Cold: 6'1"
Jake Roberts: 6'5"
Scott Hall: 6'5.5"
Big John Studd: 6'6.5"
Nash: 6'9" and 6'10" in WWF (he just looked taller in WWF as he was no taller than Tyler Mane in WCW; the difference was probably in the footware.)
Big Show: 7'
Warrior: 6'1.5"
Gorilla Monsoon: 6'4"
Macho Man: 6'0.5"
King Kong Bundy: 6'3.5"
Piper: 6'1"
Bret Hart: 6'0.5"
One Man Gang: 6'6.5"
Sid: 6'7.5"
Undertaker: 6'8"
Kane: 6'8"
I think I'm pretty close with this list. I can't imagine I'm off by more than .5" on anyone. Although, some may think Andre peaked at 6'9.75"...or Vince at 6'2"...(sorry Danimal for ripping you off; I know the ... is your trademark)
If I had to chooose his height, I guess I'd choose his shortest, which is 6'0". So 6'0" barefoot and around 6'1.5" in his lifts. Lou's dad says he's 6'5", so he was probably around that height. Deacon could be closer to 6'6" and Lou could have lost at least .5". Plus, I've never seen a staredown betweeen them. Lou was never under 6'4".
Lou: 6'4"-6'5"
Vince without lifts: 5'11.5"-6'0.5" with lifts: 6'1"-6'2"
Arnold: 6'1.5"
Hogan: 6'5.5"
Andre: 6'11.5"
Jesse Ventura: 6'3.5"
Jim Duggan: 6'3"
Ted Dibiase: 6'3.5"
Stone Cold: 6'1"
Jake Roberts: 6'5"
Scott Hall: 6'5.5"
Big John Studd: 6'6.5"
Nash: 6'9" and 6'10" in WWF (he just looked taller in WWF as he was no taller than Tyler Mane in WCW; the difference was probably in the footware.)
Big Show: 7'
Warrior: 6'1.5"
Gorilla Monsoon: 6'4"
Macho Man: 6'0.5"
King Kong Bundy: 6'3.5"
Piper: 6'1"
Bret Hart: 6'0.5"
One Man Gang: 6'6.5"
Sid: 6'7.5"
Undertaker: 6'8"
Kane: 6'8"
I think I'm pretty close with this list. I can't imagine I'm off by more than .5" on anyone. Although, some may think Andre peaked at 6'9.75"...or Vince at 6'2"...(sorry Danimal for ripping you off; I know the ... is your trademark)
Frank said on 24/Nov/10
Vegas Vince i believe is a lift wearer so he can appear close to 6ft 2 @ times
Vegas Vince i believe is a lift wearer so he can appear close to 6ft 2 @ times
Vegas said on 23/Nov/10
lou was 6'3 range peak, he was clearly shorter than 6'4 and 6'5 guys in his 20s/early 30s
6'2 was vinces billed height danimal, he wasn't 3 inches taller than bret hart or 5 taller than your 5'9 davey boy smith
how can vince have been 6'2 if he was clearly shorter than 6'2 jim duggan in the 80s and clearly shorter than curt hennig who himself probably didn't reach that mark??
lou was 6'3 range peak, he was clearly shorter than 6'4 and 6'5 guys in his 20s/early 30s
6'2 was vinces billed height danimal, he wasn't 3 inches taller than bret hart or 5 taller than your 5'9 davey boy smith
how can vince have been 6'2 if he was clearly shorter than 6'2 jim duggan in the 80s and clearly shorter than curt hennig who himself probably didn't reach that mark??
Frank said on 23/Nov/10
Lou is sometimes in that show King Of Queens and i met The Big Black guy who plays Deacon i believe He told me hes 6ft 5 and Lou is Shorter than him so Lou was never 6ft 5
Lou is sometimes in that show King Of Queens and i met The Big Black guy who plays Deacon i believe He told me hes 6ft 5 and Lou is Shorter than him so Lou was never 6ft 5
James said on 23/Nov/10
Frank says on 22/Nov/10
Vince looked alittle taller than Arnold.. I know people who met Arnold and some told me he was 5ft 10 and some told me 6ft 1 I believe he wears Lifts
Lou Fereigno was listed @ 6ft 5 and hes about 6ft 2.5
Funny you mentioned Lou Ferringo because apprently Arnie was audtioning for the role of the incredible hulk and they stood lou and arnie side by side and there was a very big height gap between the 2 bodybuilders so lou got the role.
Frank says on 22/Nov/10
Vince looked alittle taller than Arnold.. I know people who met Arnold and some told me he was 5ft 10 and some told me 6ft 1 I believe he wears Lifts
Lou Fereigno was listed @ 6ft 5 and hes about 6ft 2.5
Funny you mentioned Lou Ferringo because apprently Arnie was audtioning for the role of the incredible hulk and they stood lou and arnie side by side and there was a very big height gap between the 2 bodybuilders so lou got the role.
Frank said on 22/Nov/10
Vince looked alittle taller than Arnold.. I know people who met Arnold and some told me he was 5ft 10 and some told me 6ft 1 I believe he wears Lifts
Lou Fereigno was listed @ 6ft 5 and hes about 6ft 2.5
Vince looked alittle taller than Arnold.. I know people who met Arnold and some told me he was 5ft 10 and some told me 6ft 1 I believe he wears Lifts
Lou Fereigno was listed @ 6ft 5 and hes about 6ft 2.5
James said on 22/Nov/10
Vince looks similar in height to Arnold Schwazenneger.
Vince looks similar in height to Arnold Schwazenneger.
Danimal said on 21/Nov/10
Anonymous says on 20/Nov/10
Peter says on 19/Nov/10
I saw arnold way back in 1992 he was 6'2.5" barefoot that time,I can say this because I am 6'1" and he was almost 1.5"-2" taller than me.Guys his correct height now is 6'2".This guy is a tall man.Every inch/centimeter of a bodybuilder is recorded.His peak height was 6'2.5" now more of a 6'1.5"-6'2" guy.
You can say this because you are obviously making it up. I have seen Arnold up close countless times. I attend the same church (St. Monica's Church in Santa Monica, CA). I am 6'1.5" - 6'2" in shoes. The top of Arnold's head is roughly even with the bridge of my nose. How could he possibly be 6'2.5" barefoot when he's only 5'10" shod? He is not a tall man. As I posted earlier, official body building stats are bogus.
6'2" peak and has fallen below 6'1" today at 65 years of age (looks more compressed these days).. As for Trump, he was between 6'2" and 6'3" at his peak (he's also in his mid 60's and most men by that age have lost at least 1")....
Anonymous says on 20/Nov/10
Peter says on 19/Nov/10
I saw arnold way back in 1992 he was 6'2.5" barefoot that time,I can say this because I am 6'1" and he was almost 1.5"-2" taller than me.Guys his correct height now is 6'2".This guy is a tall man.Every inch/centimeter of a bodybuilder is recorded.His peak height was 6'2.5" now more of a 6'1.5"-6'2" guy.
You can say this because you are obviously making it up. I have seen Arnold up close countless times. I attend the same church (St. Monica's Church in Santa Monica, CA). I am 6'1.5" - 6'2" in shoes. The top of Arnold's head is roughly even with the bridge of my nose. How could he possibly be 6'2.5" barefoot when he's only 5'10" shod? He is not a tall man. As I posted earlier, official body building stats are bogus.
6'2" peak and has fallen below 6'1" today at 65 years of age (looks more compressed these days).. As for Trump, he was between 6'2" and 6'3" at his peak (he's also in his mid 60's and most men by that age have lost at least 1")....
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Nov/10
188cm is fair for his peak, James.
could be 6"1 today, but not under.
188cm is fair for his peak, James.
could be 6"1 today, but not under.
James said on 20/Nov/10
Trump could still be 6'2 but not 6'2.5 or 6'3. maybe when he was younger.
to be fair i think vince could be 184cm today. 186cm peak?
Trump could still be 6'2 but not 6'2.5 or 6'3. maybe when he was younger.
to be fair i think vince could be 184cm today. 186cm peak?
Frank said on 19/Nov/10
Trump is taller than 6ft1 .5 everyone who has seen him said he appears closer to 6ft 3 I assume he is 6ft 2 to 6ft 2.5
Trump is taller than 6ft1 .5 everyone who has seen him said he appears closer to 6ft 3 I assume he is 6ft 2 to 6ft 2.5
Rampage(-_-_)Clover said on 19/Nov/10
He peaked at 6"2
185-186cm today.
He peaked at 6"2
185-186cm today.
James said on 11/Nov/10
Vegas he is around 6'0 today. 6'1 peak.
With now 6'1.5 (187cm) Donal Trump.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
With 187-188cm Triple H
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Vegas he is around 6'0 today. 6'1 peak.
With now 6'1.5 (187cm) Donal Trump.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
With 187-188cm Triple H
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Alex said on 9/Nov/10
Frank, I never had an official measurement out of bed but I tried by marking a wall and I've gotten 6'0.75 and 6'1 a few different times. Yea I'll measure slightly over 6'0 until the evening.
Frank, I never had an official measurement out of bed but I tried by marking a wall and I've gotten 6'0.75 and 6'1 a few different times. Yea I'll measure slightly over 6'0 until the evening.
Frank said on 8/Nov/10
Alex you always measure altittle more that 6ft and you said your just about 6ft 1 in the morning
Alex you always measure altittle more that 6ft and you said your just about 6ft 1 in the morning
Vegas said on 8/Nov/10
years of wrestling injuries?? what are you talking about james. vince has wrestled but a handful of matches, his first match was in like 1999
the only injury i know vince suffered in ring was a quad tear Click Here
vince is still in great shape, i doubt he has lost much if any height even at his age, i could buy half an inch though but shouldn't be more than that, jack palance was another who kept himself in great shape into his 70s and his height stayed the same, i remember in 1994 (in his mid 70s) he was the same height as chevy chase and palance was listed 6'3 in the 1960s
years of wrestling injuries?? what are you talking about james. vince has wrestled but a handful of matches, his first match was in like 1999
the only injury i know vince suffered in ring was a quad tear Click Here
vince is still in great shape, i doubt he has lost much if any height even at his age, i could buy half an inch though but shouldn't be more than that, jack palance was another who kept himself in great shape into his 70s and his height stayed the same, i remember in 1994 (in his mid 70s) he was the same height as chevy chase and palance was listed 6'3 in the 1960s
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.