Add a Comment9895 comments
Average Guess (944 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 7.69in (202.4cm)
Current: 6ft 6.4in (199.1cm)
Peak: 6ft 7.69in (202.4cm)
Current: 6ft 6.4in (199.1cm)
Rantsrob said on 5/Oct/08
M.o.r.g says on 4/Oct/08
Typical users of this site,think it's ok to dish it out but go and cry to the guy who runs it(rob) if anyone stands up to them.
Its not hard to voice your opinion and discuss. Once you loose respect on this site its hard to get it back. Ask Ola
M.o.r.g says on 4/Oct/08
Typical users of this site,think it's ok to dish it out but go and cry to the guy who runs it(rob) if anyone stands up to them.
Its not hard to voice your opinion and discuss. Once you loose respect on this site its hard to get it back. Ask Ola
hs2008 said on 5/Oct/08
Calling somebody a "fag" isn't standing up to them, it's pathetic name calling.
Calling somebody a "fag" isn't standing up to them, it's pathetic name calling.
Alex said on 4/Oct/08
I'd say no more than 6 inches between HHH in Kane based on most photos.
I'd say no more than 6 inches between HHH in Kane based on most photos.
M.o.r.g said on 4/Oct/08
Typical users of this site,think it's ok to dish it out but go and cry to the guy who runs it(rob) if anyone stands up to them.
Typical users of this site,think it's ok to dish it out but go and cry to the guy who runs it(rob) if anyone stands up to them.
Danimal said on 3/Oct/08
M.o.r.g says on 3/Oct/08
6'7 inches lmao. kid? no im just not an old fag like u. Youre the one who need your eyes testing.sorry but my photo's are better.
Rob, you should ban this guy for calling another poster a fag. He has no respect. What do you think?
Editor Rob
M.o.r.g says on 3/Oct/08
6'7 inches lmao. kid? no im just not an old fag like u. Youre the one who need your eyes testing.sorry but my photo's are better.
Rob, you should ban this guy for calling another poster a fag. He has no respect. What do you think?
Editor Rob yes, Morg has no respect on here, I've deleted a number of his posts but he didn't take the hints.
M.o.r.g said on 3/Oct/08
6'7 inches lmao. kid? no im just not an old fag like u. Youre the one who need your eyes testing.sorry but my photo's are better.
6'7 inches lmao. kid? no im just not an old fag like u. Youre the one who need your eyes testing.sorry but my photo's are better.
sid said on 2/Oct/08
kane tripple hhh segment was funny oops sorry lol ha ha, kane was slouching, kane stood up straight he looked 7 inches taller then hhh.
kane tripple hhh segment was funny oops sorry lol ha ha, kane was slouching, kane stood up straight he looked 7 inches taller then hhh.
sid said on 2/Oct/08
M.o.r.g Kane had 7 inches on hhh. 6 inches on bill goldberg, get your eyes checked kid
M.o.r.g Kane had 7 inches on hhh. 6 inches on bill goldberg, get your eyes checked kid
M.o.r.g said on 2/Oct/08
Backstage stuff is bullsh*t.
Backstage stuff is bullsh*t.
Anonymous said on 2/Oct/08
skip forward to the end of this video, lesnar and akebono are side by side in the ring Click Here
kane and triple h Click Here
skip forward to the end of this video, lesnar and akebono are side by side in the ring Click Here
kane and triple h Click Here
KingNick said on 1/Oct/08
Kane and HHH Click Here
Kane vs. Goldberg Click Here
when did Lesnar and Akebobo face off? Anyone got a pic?
Kane and HHH Click Here
Kane vs. Goldberg Click Here
when did Lesnar and Akebobo face off? Anyone got a pic?
M.o.r.g said on 1/Oct/08
5-6 inches my ARSE. more like 2 at most.Lol ive seen that match with brock a few times and sorry akebono isnt much taller.and uh yeah kane didnt look much bigger than triple or goldberg.get over it.
5-6 inches my ARSE. more like 2 at most.Lol ive seen that match with brock a few times and sorry akebono isnt much taller.and uh yeah kane didnt look much bigger than triple or goldberg.get over it.
Da Man said on 1/Oct/08
M.o.r.g says on 30/Sep/08
"And another thing i doubt akebono is 6'8 he was barely taller than lesnar.Unless u wanna say brock is 6'3 or 4 which is more realistic.But everyone will start bitching like girls and saying brock is about 4 foot or something."
Give it a rest. Akebono was "barely taller" than Lesnar? On another board you said Kane was "barely taller" than HHH and Goldberg were.
I guess the real question is, how do you define "barely taller?" If you consider 5-6" "barely taller", then I would tend to agree with you.
M.o.r.g says on 30/Sep/08
"And another thing i doubt akebono is 6'8 he was barely taller than lesnar.Unless u wanna say brock is 6'3 or 4 which is more realistic.But everyone will start bitching like girls and saying brock is about 4 foot or something."
Give it a rest. Akebono was "barely taller" than Lesnar? On another board you said Kane was "barely taller" than HHH and Goldberg were.
I guess the real question is, how do you define "barely taller?" If you consider 5-6" "barely taller", then I would tend to agree with you.
Anonymous said on 1/Oct/08
M.o.r.g says on 30/Sep/08
And another thing i doubt akebono is 6'8 he was barely taller than lesnar.Unless u wanna say brock is 6'3 or 4 which is more realistic.But everyone will start bitching like girls and saying brock is about 4 foot or something.
he had 5-6 inches on lesnar, akebono with 6'4 bob sapp who is listed at 6'7 himself in mma, there is 4 inches there unles you wanna say sapp is 5'11 or something Click Here
M.o.r.g says on 30/Sep/08
And another thing i doubt akebono is 6'8 he was barely taller than lesnar.Unless u wanna say brock is 6'3 or 4 which is more realistic.But everyone will start bitching like girls and saying brock is about 4 foot or something.
he had 5-6 inches on lesnar, akebono with 6'4 bob sapp who is listed at 6'7 himself in mma, there is 4 inches there unles you wanna say sapp is 5'11 or something Click Here
M.o.r.g said on 30/Sep/08
And another thing i doubt akebono is 6'8 he was barely taller than lesnar.Unless u wanna say brock is 6'3 or 4 which is more realistic.But everyone will start bitching like girls and saying brock is about 4 foot or something.
And another thing i doubt akebono is 6'8 he was barely taller than lesnar.Unless u wanna say brock is 6'3 or 4 which is more realistic.But everyone will start bitching like girls and saying brock is about 4 foot or something.
M.o.r.g said on 30/Sep/08
Well if A train is 6'6 then so is undertaker.even someone on here posted a pic of them squaring off,and they were the same height.And why do people still call him "albert" he hasnt been called that since 2002.
Well if A train is 6'6 then so is undertaker.even someone on here posted a pic of them squaring off,and they were the same height.And why do people still call him "albert" he hasnt been called that since 2002.
Ghost said on 30/Sep/08
Yep, Albert is 6'6 and wears big boots. I think he was billed as 6'8 in the WWE.
Yep, Albert is 6'6 and wears big boots. I think he was billed as 6'8 in the WWE.
KingNick said on 29/Sep/08
Shock of Electric, nice photos man
Shock of Electric, nice photos man
Annoyed said on 29/Sep/08
well despite the fact we know that some people can be underbilled by accident this is very very unlikelly so we can assume ALbert is 6'6" making taker around 6'7" . Although does albert not have slightly larger heels than Taker? either way id say 6'7".5" and maybe ( MAYBE ) 6'8" peak ?? anyone in this school of thought?
well despite the fact we know that some people can be underbilled by accident this is very very unlikelly so we can assume ALbert is 6'6" making taker around 6'7" . Although does albert not have slightly larger heels than Taker? either way id say 6'7".5" and maybe ( MAYBE ) 6'8" peak ?? anyone in this school of thought?
Big Show said on 29/Sep/08
Annoyed says on 29/Sep/08
Right so Akebono who was a sumo wrestler measured and wieghed, he yielded 6'8" barefoot. And albert looks almost his height. is Albert actually 6'7"?? because he isnt 2 inches shorter than actual 6'8" Akebono and tbh i dont even see an inch between the two but ill assume Albert is wearing big shoes. In fact when i think of it, Albert is actually a humungous man! does anyone know what his billed height is ?? anyway if Albert is 6'7" then Taker is about 6'8" and if Albert is around 6'6" Taker is around 6'7" .
Albert was billed 198 cm or 6'6 in his match with Brock Lesnar while wrestling in Japan. The same height as he was back when he was playing College Football. So I doubt he was taller than that.
He was wearing some big boots in his match with Akebono (definately bigger than the ones he wore in his match with Taker). Akebono was wearing flat-soled wrestling boots, like they used to wear in the old days.
Annoyed says on 29/Sep/08
Right so Akebono who was a sumo wrestler measured and wieghed, he yielded 6'8" barefoot. And albert looks almost his height. is Albert actually 6'7"?? because he isnt 2 inches shorter than actual 6'8" Akebono and tbh i dont even see an inch between the two but ill assume Albert is wearing big shoes. In fact when i think of it, Albert is actually a humungous man! does anyone know what his billed height is ?? anyway if Albert is 6'7" then Taker is about 6'8" and if Albert is around 6'6" Taker is around 6'7" .
Albert was billed 198 cm or 6'6 in his match with Brock Lesnar while wrestling in Japan. The same height as he was back when he was playing College Football. So I doubt he was taller than that.
He was wearing some big boots in his match with Akebono (definately bigger than the ones he wore in his match with Taker). Akebono was wearing flat-soled wrestling boots, like they used to wear in the old days.
Annoyed said on 29/Sep/08
Right so Akebono who was a sumo wrestler measured and wieghed, he yielded 6'8" barefoot. And albert looks almost his height. is Albert actually 6'7"?? because he isnt 2 inches shorter than actual 6'8" Akebono and tbh i dont even see an inch between the two but ill assume Albert is wearing big shoes. In fact when i think of it, Albert is actually a humungous man! does anyone know what his billed height is ?? anyway if Albert is 6'7" then Taker is about 6'8" and if Albert is around 6'6" Taker is around 6'7" .
Right so Akebono who was a sumo wrestler measured and wieghed, he yielded 6'8" barefoot. And albert looks almost his height. is Albert actually 6'7"?? because he isnt 2 inches shorter than actual 6'8" Akebono and tbh i dont even see an inch between the two but ill assume Albert is wearing big shoes. In fact when i think of it, Albert is actually a humungous man! does anyone know what his billed height is ?? anyway if Albert is 6'7" then Taker is about 6'8" and if Albert is around 6'6" Taker is around 6'7" .
Shock of Electric said on 29/Sep/08
Taker Old boots
Click Here
Click Here
New boots
Click Here
Click Here
Kane's old 1.5"s
Click Here
Kane's newer boots (non lifts)
Click Here
Kane current semi lifts
Click Here
Kane's original 1.75" or possibly 2" super lifts.
Click Here
Kane in the original super lifts with Taker in his very thin boots similar to Austin's
Click Here
height comparison angle in Kane's favor (boot differential 1-1.25" in Kane's favor)
Click Here
Taker in Kane's super lifts
Click Here
Taker Old boots
Click Here
Click Here
New boots
Click Here
Click Here
Kane's old 1.5"s
Click Here
Kane's newer boots (non lifts)
Click Here
Kane current semi lifts
Click Here
Kane's original 1.75" or possibly 2" super lifts.
Click Here
Kane in the original super lifts with Taker in his very thin boots similar to Austin's
Click Here
height comparison angle in Kane's favor (boot differential 1-1.25" in Kane's favor)
Click Here
Taker in Kane's super lifts
Click Here
Clay said on 27/Sep/08
I saw at least 6 inches between Taker and Khali in backstage brawls.
I saw at least 6 inches between Taker and Khali in backstage brawls.
KingNick said on 26/Sep/08
I posted a pic of their first staredown but it doesn't look like it went through. Can't find it now for some reason but here's another one that's probably better
Click Here
I posted a pic of their first staredown but it doesn't look like it went through. Can't find it now for some reason but here's another one that's probably better
Click Here
Just_D said on 26/Sep/08
tough to gauge, but i'd say 6'8" is about right
tough to gauge, but i'd say 6'8" is about right
Red said on 26/Sep/08
I think UT worked with his boots abainst Khali because he looks taller than Kane in his medium monsters with Khali and we know he looked never taller next to Kane!
I think UT worked with his boots abainst Khali because he looks taller than Kane in his medium monsters with Khali and we know he looked never taller next to Kane!
Shock of Electric said on 25/Sep/08
Taker's old boots
Click Here
Click Here
New boots
Click Here
Click Here
Kane's old 1.5"s
Click Here
Kane's newer boots (non lifts)
Click Here
Kane current semi lifts
Click Here
Kane's original 1.75" or possibly 2" super lifts.
Click Here
Kane in the original super lifts with Taker in his very thin boots similar to Austin's
Click Here
height comparison angle in Kane's favor (boot differential 1-1.25" in Kane's favor)
Click Here
Taker in Kane's super lifts
Click Here
Taker's old boots
Click Here
Click Here
New boots
Click Here
Click Here
Kane's old 1.5"s
Click Here
Kane's newer boots (non lifts)
Click Here
Kane current semi lifts
Click Here
Kane's original 1.75" or possibly 2" super lifts.
Click Here
Kane in the original super lifts with Taker in his very thin boots similar to Austin's
Click Here
height comparison angle in Kane's favor (boot differential 1-1.25" in Kane's favor)
Click Here
Taker in Kane's super lifts
Click Here
Drexyl said on 25/Sep/08
The tallest Taker ever looked next to Khali was their very first staredown, and Khali had 5 inches on him there.
The tallest Taker ever looked next to Khali was their very first staredown, and Khali had 5 inches on him there.
Da Man said on 23/Sep/08
When did Taker only look 4" shorter than Khali?
When did Taker only look 4" shorter than Khali?
Rantsrob said on 23/Sep/08
Takers boots are not as flat as everyone thinks they are.
Takers boots are not as flat as everyone thinks they are.
Ghost said on 23/Sep/08
Alex,
So are you saying he was wearing lifts to look 4-5 inches shorter than 7'+ Khali?
Alex,
So are you saying he was wearing lifts to look 4-5 inches shorter than 7'+ Khali?
Drexyl said on 22/Sep/08
Undertaker's too close there to really call it. I have never, ever seen Kane look shorter than Taker in any staredown.
Undertaker's too close there to really call it. I have never, ever seen Kane look shorter than Taker in any staredown.
Clay said on 22/Sep/08
And please no ''Khali is barely over 7'0 '' Comments please the man has said 7'2 more than once and he had 5.5-6 inches on 6'8 Kane, who probably had a footwear advantage.
And please no ''Khali is barely over 7'0 '' Comments please the man has said 7'2 more than once and he had 5.5-6 inches on 6'8 Kane, who probably had a footwear advantage.
Clay said on 22/Sep/08
Well I wouldn't say there is no way he was only 5 inches under Khali unless he had a huge boot advantage. If you want to see what a 6'6.5/6'7 guy looks like next to Khali check out the Gary Godsey pic.
Well I wouldn't say there is no way he was only 5 inches under Khali unless he had a huge boot advantage. If you want to see what a 6'6.5/6'7 guy looks like next to Khali check out the Gary Godsey pic.
Dwight said on 22/Sep/08
I myself have a big build and am wide, I weigh in at 335 lbs.
I myself have a big build and am wide, I weigh in at 335 lbs.
Alex said on 22/Sep/08
Clay, there is no way UT is still 6'8 today. If you just look at him today or within the last couple years comparing him to the 90's he was def a little taller back then.
Clay, there is no way UT is still 6'8 today. If you just look at him today or within the last couple years comparing him to the 90's he was def a little taller back then.
Clay said on 21/Sep/08
6'8'' is fine for Taker, even still today.
6'8'' is fine for Taker, even still today.
Big King said on 21/Sep/08
I have some good news. Yesterday I saw in a spot where The Undertaker was standing face to face to 6'3" Batista and Taker didn't look full four inches taller. There was maybe at least two inches difference between them. Taker could be 6'7" at his peak. I would give him at least 6'6".
I have some good news. Yesterday I saw in a spot where The Undertaker was standing face to face to 6'3" Batista and Taker didn't look full four inches taller. There was maybe at least two inches difference between them. Taker could be 6'7" at his peak. I would give him at least 6'6".
Frank said on 19/Sep/08
Well Justin he appeared very tall to me after we took the picture i said to him " Damm YOU ARE TALL HOW TALL ARE YOU ?? HE SAID 6FT 9 And he looked it
He could have been easily 6ft 8 barefoot and he could have past for 6ft 10 (which we know hes not) Justin like i said many times on here i was on Higher ground them him because the floor was on an upward slope and i was slightly behind him so i appear alittle taller than i am
Well Justin he appeared very tall to me after we took the picture i said to him " Damm YOU ARE TALL HOW TALL ARE YOU ?? HE SAID 6FT 9 And he looked it
He could have been easily 6ft 8 barefoot and he could have past for 6ft 10 (which we know hes not) Justin like i said many times on here i was on Higher ground them him because the floor was on an upward slope and i was slightly behind him so i appear alittle taller than i am
Justin? Masters? said on 18/Sep/08
You people may not realize it, but if taker stood up straight in this photo up above, he would probably stand a whole foot over paul bearer and about 10 inches or so over frank. now i dont know what the deal is, but taker has always looked between 6'7.5''-6'10''. dont believe me? take a size 12 shoe in mens and put it on the top of paul bearers head, with taker standing as straight as possible, i would guarantee that whenever this photo was taken, taker would most definately be somewhere around the 6'10'' mark! frank stated himself that taker looked to be about 6'9'' or so. its all about camera angles, boots, ect... and the staredown with nash, he appeared roughly a little over an inch under nash. so with the knee surgeries or whatever, I would give the undertaker peak 6'9'' maybe not even a shade under in boots, and about 6'8'' in boots today. who knows what the story is with the boots or lifts or what he is barefoot. whats your take on this frank??
You people may not realize it, but if taker stood up straight in this photo up above, he would probably stand a whole foot over paul bearer and about 10 inches or so over frank. now i dont know what the deal is, but taker has always looked between 6'7.5''-6'10''. dont believe me? take a size 12 shoe in mens and put it on the top of paul bearers head, with taker standing as straight as possible, i would guarantee that whenever this photo was taken, taker would most definately be somewhere around the 6'10'' mark! frank stated himself that taker looked to be about 6'9'' or so. its all about camera angles, boots, ect... and the staredown with nash, he appeared roughly a little over an inch under nash. so with the knee surgeries or whatever, I would give the undertaker peak 6'9'' maybe not even a shade under in boots, and about 6'8'' in boots today. who knows what the story is with the boots or lifts or what he is barefoot. whats your take on this frank??
Captain Spaulding said on 16/Sep/08
Dwight no offense or anything man but the only way ill believe anyone saying there 6'7" or taller on this site is if they post a pic of themselves by one of those height measuring things.
Dwight no offense or anything man but the only way ill believe anyone saying there 6'7" or taller on this site is if they post a pic of themselves by one of those height measuring things.
Anonymous said on 16/Sep/08
Hey The Undertaker how do you known your brother kane in wwf and wwe. because Frist Thing You are a wwf super stairs in your life right. And Know Kane is a wwf Super Stairs.
Hey The Undertaker how do you known your brother kane in wwf and wwe. because Frist Thing You are a wwf super stairs in your life right. And Know Kane is a wwf Super Stairs.
Frank said on 16/Sep/08
Dwight even if you rally are 6ft 10 1/2 Taker has a Big Build and he is pretty wide TV does not show it so you would not embarrass him believe me
Dwight even if you rally are 6ft 10 1/2 Taker has a Big Build and he is pretty wide TV does not show it so you would not embarrass him believe me
hs2008 said on 15/Sep/08
Lol, yet another giant on this site.
I doubt Undertaker would be embarrassed standing next to a taller guy, at 6'7"-6'8" I imagine he's pretty secure with his own height.
Lol, yet another giant on this site.
I doubt Undertaker would be embarrassed standing next to a taller guy, at 6'7"-6'8" I imagine he's pretty secure with his own height.
tuga said on 15/Sep/08
Thanks Big Show.
Albert stacks very well against both men, I paused at 5:19 at his match vs akebono and he seens almost same height. I would bet if taker and akebono had a staredown they would be the same height, comparing both to big show also proves that.
Albert should be a strong 6'6, given his footware advantge he seens almost same height as 6'8 men.
Thanks Big Show.
Albert stacks very well against both men, I paused at 5:19 at his match vs akebono and he seens almost same height. I would bet if taker and akebono had a staredown they would be the same height, comparing both to big show also proves that.
Albert should be a strong 6'6, given his footware advantge he seens almost same height as 6'8 men.
Dwight said on 14/Sep/08
Undertaker is not 6'10 1/2" as they always bill him. Please. Funny how WWE likes to inflate wrestler's heights and even their weights. UT would have to wear high platform boots to get to that height. I would actually embarrass him if we stood next to each other in regular shoes.
I actually stand 6'10.5" barefoot, 6'11" in shoes.
Undertaker is not 6'10 1/2" as they always bill him. Please. Funny how WWE likes to inflate wrestler's heights and even their weights. UT would have to wear high platform boots to get to that height. I would actually embarrass him if we stood next to each other in regular shoes.
I actually stand 6'10.5" barefoot, 6'11" in shoes.
hs2008 said on 14/Sep/08
100% born in 1965 was The Undertaker. Some websites have listed him as being born in 1962 for years but they're wrong.
Look here:
Click Here
100% born in 1965 was The Undertaker. Some websites have listed him as being born in 1962 for years but they're wrong.
Look here:
Click Here
Captain Spaulding said on 14/Sep/08
Taker is 6'8", and was born either in 1962 or 1965. Its a mystery.
Taker is 6'8", and was born either in 1962 or 1965. Its a mystery.
Ray said on 14/Sep/08
Ola: 1965; that's what the family tree legends/texas births has him at Click Here website has him at; but if that's not enough, he also graduated from high school in 1983 (check third line down; also has pics) Click Here
This indicates he was around 18 in 1983 and born most likely in 1965. I say 1965 since this is the only evidence we have and seems to be pretty good. You'll hear other birthdates for him but they have no merit really.
Ola: 1965; that's what the family tree legends/texas births has him at Click Here website has him at; but if that's not enough, he also graduated from high school in 1983 (check third line down; also has pics) Click Here
This indicates he was around 18 in 1983 and born most likely in 1965. I say 1965 since this is the only evidence we have and seems to be pretty good. You'll hear other birthdates for him but they have no merit really.
Big Show said on 13/Sep/08
tuga says on 12/Sep/08
Big Show, thanks for the answer but the links don
tuga says on 12/Sep/08
Big Show, thanks for the answer but the links don
tuga said on 12/Sep/08
Big Show, thanks for the answer but the links don
Big Show, thanks for the answer but the links don
Big Show said on 12/Sep/08
tuga says on 8/Sep/08
Here we go again with atrain/taker staredown...
Click Here
Carefull downgrading atrain...he towers vince BIG WAY (watch near the end of the video), and vince has no small footware also, downgrading atrain would mean trouble for a lot of wrestlers that of course standed next to vince...
Does anyone have akebono vs giant bernard video? I remember someone posting it here. It would be great to compare them there, pics sometimes are deceiving.
Here you have the Akebono/Giant Bernard video
Click Here
Compare it with the Undertaker/Albert video
Click Here
Matt Bloom ain't taller than 6'6. I've mentioned this about a million times already, he was listed as 6'6 in college football and as 198 cm (6'5.95) in NJPW. So he ain't taller than that.
tuga says on 8/Sep/08
Here we go again with atrain/taker staredown...
Click Here
Carefull downgrading atrain...he towers vince BIG WAY (watch near the end of the video), and vince has no small footware also, downgrading atrain would mean trouble for a lot of wrestlers that of course standed next to vince...
Does anyone have akebono vs giant bernard video? I remember someone posting it here. It would be great to compare them there, pics sometimes are deceiving.
Here you have the Akebono/Giant Bernard video
Click Here
Compare it with the Undertaker/Albert video
Click Here
Matt Bloom ain't taller than 6'6. I've mentioned this about a million times already, he was listed as 6'6 in college football and as 198 cm (6'5.95) in NJPW. So he ain't taller than that.
Derek said on 12/Sep/08
Clay says on 11/Sep/08
"No actually Mark Calloway is really 6'7.5-6'8".
6'8" prime without a doubt. He's nothing over 6'7" now.
Clay says on 11/Sep/08
"No actually Mark Calloway is really 6'7.5-6'8".
6'8" prime without a doubt. He's nothing over 6'7" now.
Clay said on 11/Sep/08
No actually Mark Calloway is really 6'7.5-6'8.
No actually Mark Calloway is really 6'7.5-6'8.
Monte said on 10/Sep/08
The Undertaker is really 6ft 10.25in tall
The Undertaker is really 6ft 10.25in tall
tuga said on 8/Sep/08
Here we go again with atrain/taker staredown...
Click Here
Carefull downgrading atrain...he towers vince BIG WAY (watch near the end of the video), and vince has no small footware also, downgrading atrain would mean trouble for a lot of wrestlers that of course standed next to vince...
Does anyone have akebono vs giant bernard video? I remember someone posting it here. It would be great to compare them there, pics sometimes are deceiving.
Here we go again with atrain/taker staredown...
Click Here
Carefull downgrading atrain...he towers vince BIG WAY (watch near the end of the video), and vince has no small footware also, downgrading atrain would mean trouble for a lot of wrestlers that of course standed next to vince...
Does anyone have akebono vs giant bernard video? I remember someone posting it here. It would be great to compare them there, pics sometimes are deceiving.
Danimal said on 8/Sep/08
Alex2 says on 7/Sep/08
God if anythign A-Train could be 6'7" 6'6" BARE MINIMUM.
NO. He was wearing huge boots and still was an easy 2" shorter than MAX 6'8" Akeebono. Chances are A-Train is closer to 6'5.5" than he is 6'6 1/4", seeing he was listed at 6'6" in football. My step brother is just under 6'2.5" and was listed at 6'3" in College football.
Alex2 says on 7/Sep/08
God if anythign A-Train could be 6'7" 6'6" BARE MINIMUM.
NO. He was wearing huge boots and still was an easy 2" shorter than MAX 6'8" Akeebono. Chances are A-Train is closer to 6'5.5" than he is 6'6 1/4", seeing he was listed at 6'6" in football. My step brother is just under 6'2.5" and was listed at 6'3" in College football.
Ghost said on 8/Sep/08
Thanks for the Goldberg/Taker picture Tuga.
Danimal,
So that's what you base your estimation of Taker's height today on? For all we know they may not even be standing on level surface.
Haven't you in the past disregarded pictures for height comparison, because the persons feet were cut of?
So far I have seen no evidence whatsover that would suggest Taker to be anything under 6'7 today.
Thanks for the Goldberg/Taker picture Tuga.
Danimal,
So that's what you base your estimation of Taker's height today on? For all we know they may not even be standing on level surface.
Haven't you in the past disregarded pictures for height comparison, because the persons feet were cut of?
So far I have seen no evidence whatsover that would suggest Taker to be anything under 6'7 today.
Drexyl said on 8/Sep/08
Goldberg would be more like 6,3" in shoes, and that's a **** picture anyway.
Taker and Kane both stack up to Khali better than Godsey does. Khali looks relaxed in the pic with Godsey. He always stood to his full height when staring down Taker and Kane.
Goldberg would be more like 6,3" in shoes, and that's a **** picture anyway.
Taker and Kane both stack up to Khali better than Godsey does. Khali looks relaxed in the pic with Godsey. He always stood to his full height when staring down Taker and Kane.
Drexyl said on 8/Sep/08
Goldberg would be more like 6,3" in shoes, and that's a **** picture anyway.
Taker and Kane both stack up to Khali better than Godsey does.
Goldberg would be more like 6,3" in shoes, and that's a **** picture anyway.
Taker and Kane both stack up to Khali better than Godsey does.
Ghost said on 8/Sep/08
Danimal says on 7/Sep/08
Ghost says on 7/Sep/08
Taker looks taller next to Khali than Godsey, even if he Khali is closer to the camera. That's an easy 5 inch difference, probably a little more making Khali over 7 feet, but not quite 7'1.
The 6'6 nonsense for Taker needs to stop (as well as the 6'10 nonsense). There is like 1 picture where at first glance he looks to be in the 6'6 range and that is the A-train staredown. A-train was around 6'6 (He towered 6'2 Lesnar with Minimum 4 inches) and wore very thick boots and Taker was still a hair taller.
REALLY?? There is only 1 picture??? Have you not seen the pic with Goldberg and Taker at a recent casual event. Goldberg is around 6'2" and Taker looked MAX 6'6" next to him.
Wasn't that picture like from a very bad angle and had only like their heads in it or something? Please refresh my memory.
Anyway, a near 6'8 man will have to slouch when around people of normal height just to get eye-contact. Taker never had the greatest posture.
What is your take on the Khali/Taker staredown? Khali is 6'10-6'11? And Big Show 6'10-6'9? It just doesn't add up.
There is very little proof of Taker losing anymore than an 0.5 inches of height. If you think there's more proof, please present it. It comes down to what MOST of the evidence suggest. Nobody's going to look thae excact same height in every photo.
Danimal says on 7/Sep/08
Ghost says on 7/Sep/08
Taker looks taller next to Khali than Godsey, even if he Khali is closer to the camera. That's an easy 5 inch difference, probably a little more making Khali over 7 feet, but not quite 7'1.
The 6'6 nonsense for Taker needs to stop (as well as the 6'10 nonsense). There is like 1 picture where at first glance he looks to be in the 6'6 range and that is the A-train staredown. A-train was around 6'6 (He towered 6'2 Lesnar with Minimum 4 inches) and wore very thick boots and Taker was still a hair taller.
REALLY?? There is only 1 picture??? Have you not seen the pic with Goldberg and Taker at a recent casual event. Goldberg is around 6'2" and Taker looked MAX 6'6" next to him.
Wasn't that picture like from a very bad angle and had only like their heads in it or something? Please refresh my memory.
Anyway, a near 6'8 man will have to slouch when around people of normal height just to get eye-contact. Taker never had the greatest posture.
What is your take on the Khali/Taker staredown? Khali is 6'10-6'11? And Big Show 6'10-6'9? It just doesn't add up.
There is very little proof of Taker losing anymore than an 0.5 inches of height. If you think there's more proof, please present it. It comes down to what MOST of the evidence suggest. Nobody's going to look thae excact same height in every photo.
Anthony said on 8/Sep/08
Here is a quick example.
Kane vs Khali Click Here - This has been seen before but shows both men standing as tall as possible. Kane comes up to the top of Khali's eyes
Undertaker vs Khali Click Here - Different angle but shows taker pretty much on par with Kane, his hair maybe makes him look slightly taller plus the angle
Gary Godsey - Click Here NFL player as far as I can tell is listed as both 6'6 and 6'7 on most websites. Either way has to be around 6'7 in shoes. He is below khali's eyeline with khali in a slightly relaxed pose. NO WAY is undertaker 6'6. I belive both men are over 6'8
Here is a quick example.
Kane vs Khali Click Here - This has been seen before but shows both men standing as tall as possible. Kane comes up to the top of Khali's eyes
Undertaker vs Khali Click Here - Different angle but shows taker pretty much on par with Kane, his hair maybe makes him look slightly taller plus the angle
Gary Godsey - Click Here NFL player as far as I can tell is listed as both 6'6 and 6'7 on most websites. Either way has to be around 6'7 in shoes. He is below khali's eyeline with khali in a slightly relaxed pose. NO WAY is undertaker 6'6. I belive both men are over 6'8
Anthony said on 8/Sep/08
Every website I can find claims Gary Godsey is 6'6. This may be a barefoot measurement. In shoes surely he'd be close to 6'7. IMO taker and kane stack up better next to khali than Godsey does
Every website I can find claims Gary Godsey is 6'6. This may be a barefoot measurement. In shoes surely he'd be close to 6'7. IMO taker and kane stack up better next to khali than Godsey does
Clay said on 8/Sep/08
Gary Godsey is 6'6. Click Here
Whether he's 6'6 or 6'7 Khali is a lot taller there by 6 or 7 inches it looks like.
Gary Godsey is 6'6. Click Here
Whether he's 6'6 or 6'7 Khali is a lot taller there by 6 or 7 inches it looks like.
Alex2 said on 7/Sep/08
God if anythign A-Train could be 6'7" 6'6" BARE MINIMUM.
God if anythign A-Train could be 6'7" 6'6" BARE MINIMUM.
KingNick said on 7/Sep/08
Ghost says on 7/Sep/08
Taker looks taller next to Khali than Godsey, even if he Khali is closer to the camera. That's an easy 5 inch difference, probably a little more making Khali over 7 feet, but not quite 7'1.
The 6'6 nonsense for Taker needs to stop (as well as the 6'10 nonsense). There is like 1 picture where at first glance he looks to be in the 6'6 range and that is the A-train staredown. A-train was around 6'6 (He towered 6'2 Lesnar with Minimum 4 inches) and wore very thick boots and Taker was still a hair taller.
Well said my man!
Ghost says on 7/Sep/08
Taker looks taller next to Khali than Godsey, even if he Khali is closer to the camera. That's an easy 5 inch difference, probably a little more making Khali over 7 feet, but not quite 7'1.
The 6'6 nonsense for Taker needs to stop (as well as the 6'10 nonsense). There is like 1 picture where at first glance he looks to be in the 6'6 range and that is the A-train staredown. A-train was around 6'6 (He towered 6'2 Lesnar with Minimum 4 inches) and wore very thick boots and Taker was still a hair taller.
Well said my man!
Danimal said on 7/Sep/08
Ghost says on 7/Sep/08
Taker looks taller next to Khali than Godsey, even if he Khali is closer to the camera. That's an easy 5 inch difference, probably a little more making Khali over 7 feet, but not quite 7'1.
The 6'6 nonsense for Taker needs to stop (as well as the 6'10 nonsense). There is like 1 picture where at first glance he looks to be in the 6'6 range and that is the A-train staredown. A-train was around 6'6 (He towered 6'2 Lesnar with Minimum 4 inches) and wore very thick boots and Taker was still a hair taller.
REALLY?? There is only 1 picture??? Have you not seen the pic with Goldberg and Taker at a recent casual event. Goldberg is around 6'2" and Taker looked MAX 6'6" next to him.
Ghost says on 7/Sep/08
Taker looks taller next to Khali than Godsey, even if he Khali is closer to the camera. That's an easy 5 inch difference, probably a little more making Khali over 7 feet, but not quite 7'1.
The 6'6 nonsense for Taker needs to stop (as well as the 6'10 nonsense). There is like 1 picture where at first glance he looks to be in the 6'6 range and that is the A-train staredown. A-train was around 6'6 (He towered 6'2 Lesnar with Minimum 4 inches) and wore very thick boots and Taker was still a hair taller.
REALLY?? There is only 1 picture??? Have you not seen the pic with Goldberg and Taker at a recent casual event. Goldberg is around 6'2" and Taker looked MAX 6'6" next to him.
Ghost said on 7/Sep/08
Taker looks taller next to Khali than Godsey, even if he Khali is closer to the camera. That's an easy 5 inch difference, probably a little more making Khali over 7 feet, but not quite 7'1.
The 6'6 nonsense for Taker needs to stop (as well as the 6'10 nonsense). There is like 1 picture where at first glance he looks to be in the 6'6 range and that is the A-train staredown. A-train was around 6'6 (He towered 6'2 Lesnar with Minimum 4 inches) and wore very thick boots and Taker was still a hair taller.
Taker looks taller next to Khali than Godsey, even if he Khali is closer to the camera. That's an easy 5 inch difference, probably a little more making Khali over 7 feet, but not quite 7'1.
The 6'6 nonsense for Taker needs to stop (as well as the 6'10 nonsense). There is like 1 picture where at first glance he looks to be in the 6'6 range and that is the A-train staredown. A-train was around 6'6 (He towered 6'2 Lesnar with Minimum 4 inches) and wore very thick boots and Taker was still a hair taller.
Frank said on 6/Sep/08
That guy is listed @ 6ft 7 i believe
That guy is listed @ 6ft 7 i believe
Marotte said on 6/Sep/08
KingNick says on 6/Sep/08
Hey, anyone know how tall this guy is again next to Khali? Click Here
6-7
KingNick says on 6/Sep/08
Hey, anyone know how tall this guy is again next to Khali? Click Here
6-7
Danimal said on 6/Sep/08
Brian C. 35 m IL says on 4/Sep/08
Undertaker looks every bit of 6'8" if you ask me, I myself stand 6'8" tall, but weigh only 250.
No you don't.
Brian C. 35 m IL says on 4/Sep/08
Undertaker looks every bit of 6'8" if you ask me, I myself stand 6'8" tall, but weigh only 250.
No you don't.
Robby said on 6/Sep/08
I believe he is around 6'7"
I believe he is around 6'7"
Big King said on 5/Sep/08
Also his 6'10" and 6'9" claimings are a bit strange. He is no more than 6'8" and Kane is 6'8 1/2". I was a bit confused when I though that Kane is almost two inches taller than the Undertaker. Kane looks only about an inch taller than Calaway.
Also his 6'10" and 6'9" claimings are a bit strange. He is no more than 6'8" and Kane is 6'8 1/2". I was a bit confused when I though that Kane is almost two inches taller than the Undertaker. Kane looks only about an inch taller than Calaway.
Brian C. 35 m IL said on 4/Sep/08
Undertaker looks every bit of 6'8" if you ask me, I myself stand 6'8" tall, but weigh only 250.
Undertaker looks every bit of 6'8" if you ask me, I myself stand 6'8" tall, but weigh only 250.
Big King said on 4/Sep/08
Ha! You're wrong if you believe that the undertaker has the same height as Kane. Both are listed as 6'7 1/2" on celebheights but the fact is that the undertaker is almost two inches shorter than Kane.
Ha! You're wrong if you believe that the undertaker has the same height as Kane. Both are listed as 6'7 1/2" on celebheights but the fact is that the undertaker is almost two inches shorter than Kane.
Alex said on 4/Sep/08
In most faceoffs while both guys are standing straight, I still see an inch difference. Then a few times you'll see a bit more or a bit less.
In most faceoffs while both guys are standing straight, I still see an inch difference. Then a few times you'll see a bit more or a bit less.
Captain Spaulding said on 3/Sep/08
"UNDERTAKER says on 27/Aug/08
I am really 6'10".And those who have told that I am 6'7" or 6'8" they will rest in peace."
lol
Anyways takers 6'8" and bigshows 7'0"
"UNDERTAKER says on 27/Aug/08
I am really 6'10".And those who have told that I am 6'7" or 6'8" they will rest in peace."
lol
Anyways takers 6'8" and bigshows 7'0"
Big Show said on 31/Aug/08
JT says on 30/Aug/08
We had this debate a while ago. Star Trek probably tried to make them around the same height since they are from the same alien race. You can see how Schwartz in dress shoes and Big Show measure up to Roddy Piper. Click Here Schartz would not be close to Big Show if he stood fully erect. Schwartz looks considerably shorter next to 5'8" Mamun on this site than Kevin Nash, and Big Show had close to 3 inches on Nash.
If you watch the show which I've just posted, you'll see that not all of these members of the alien race are even close to 7 feet tall (like Big Show), so I doubt they just made Schwartz the same height as Big Show and the rest not.
Here's a perfect shot of Schwartz & Lundgren. I'd say Schwartz has Lundgren by 4 inches.
Click Here
JT says on 30/Aug/08
We had this debate a while ago. Star Trek probably tried to make them around the same height since they are from the same alien race. You can see how Schwartz in dress shoes and Big Show measure up to Roddy Piper. Click Here Schartz would not be close to Big Show if he stood fully erect. Schwartz looks considerably shorter next to 5'8" Mamun on this site than Kevin Nash, and Big Show had close to 3 inches on Nash.
If you watch the show which I've just posted, you'll see that not all of these members of the alien race are even close to 7 feet tall (like Big Show), so I doubt they just made Schwartz the same height as Big Show and the rest not.
Here's a perfect shot of Schwartz & Lundgren. I'd say Schwartz has Lundgren by 4 inches.
Click Here
Alex2 said on 31/Aug/08
In all honesty I really do bet that Big Show is still 7'0" if not more today. I doubt hes lost height and when he stands straight there is NOT more than 1" between him and Khali, likely less.
In all honesty I really do bet that Big Show is still 7'0" if not more today. I doubt hes lost height and when he stands straight there is NOT more than 1" between him and Khali, likely less.
KingNick said on 31/Aug/08
Thanks, Big Show.
Thanks, Big Show.
JT said on 30/Aug/08
Big Show says on 30/Aug/08
....It's a backstage pic on the set of the tv-show Star Trek Enterprise. They both played a part in the episode Borderland from 2004.
We had this debate a while ago. Star Trek probably tried to make them around the same height since they are from the same alien race. You can see how Schwartz in dress shoes and Big Show measure up to Roddy Piper. Click Here Schartz would not be close to Big Show if he stood fully erect. Schwartz looks considerably shorter next to 5'8" Mamun on this site than Kevin Nash, and Big Show had close to 3 inches on Nash.
There's a good pic out there of Schwartz looking around 4 inches taller than ~ 6'4" Dolph Lundgren, though I don't recall the footwear. He looked to have ~ 6'5" Vince Vaughn by at least 3 inches but had a big footwear advantage. I think Schwartz is at least 6'7" but no more than 6'8".
Someone on this board met Schwartz and asked him about wrestlers' heights. IIRC, he said Big Show was 7'0" or 7'1".
Big Show says on 30/Aug/08
....It's a backstage pic on the set of the tv-show Star Trek Enterprise. They both played a part in the episode Borderland from 2004.
We had this debate a while ago. Star Trek probably tried to make them around the same height since they are from the same alien race. You can see how Schwartz in dress shoes and Big Show measure up to Roddy Piper. Click Here Schartz would not be close to Big Show if he stood fully erect. Schwartz looks considerably shorter next to 5'8" Mamun on this site than Kevin Nash, and Big Show had close to 3 inches on Nash.
There's a good pic out there of Schwartz looking around 4 inches taller than ~ 6'4" Dolph Lundgren, though I don't recall the footwear. He looked to have ~ 6'5" Vince Vaughn by at least 3 inches but had a big footwear advantage. I think Schwartz is at least 6'7" but no more than 6'8".
Someone on this board met Schwartz and asked him about wrestlers' heights. IIRC, he said Big Show was 7'0" or 7'1".
Red said on 30/Aug/08
Derek says on 29/Aug/08
TELLEM says on 28/Aug/08
"is there proof on the internet? like youtube"?
Click Here
That
Derek says on 29/Aug/08
TELLEM says on 28/Aug/08
"is there proof on the internet? like youtube"?
Click Here
That
Big Show said on 30/Aug/08
KingNick says on 29/Aug/08
What is that Big Show/UBG photo from anyway?
It's a backstage pic on the set of the tv-show Star Trek Enterprise. They both played a part in the episode Borderland from 2004.
Part I: Click Here
Part II: Click Here
Part III: Click Here
Part IV: Click Here
Part V: Click Here
Big Show was the leader of the gang, so I doubt Schwartz would have a footwear advantage over Show.
He appears at the end of part II, part III and part IV. Schwartz only has a small part (he's nothing more than an extra).
KingNick says on 29/Aug/08
What is that Big Show/UBG photo from anyway?
It's a backstage pic on the set of the tv-show Star Trek Enterprise. They both played a part in the episode Borderland from 2004.
Part I: Click Here
Part II: Click Here
Part III: Click Here
Part IV: Click Here
Part V: Click Here
Big Show was the leader of the gang, so I doubt Schwartz would have a footwear advantage over Show.
He appears at the end of part II, part III and part IV. Schwartz only has a small part (he's nothing more than an extra).
Big Show said on 30/Aug/08
On the Big Show board I think more than enough evidence has been given to support that Big Show was around 7 feet during his peak. Nowadays he looks to have lost a bit of height due to his bad posture, but not much though (maybe 0.5"). The Great Khali only has an inch on Big Show today. I think Big Show is 6'11.5 today and Schwartz 3 inches shorter, making him 6'8.5.
On the Big Show board I think more than enough evidence has been given to support that Big Show was around 7 feet during his peak. Nowadays he looks to have lost a bit of height due to his bad posture, but not much though (maybe 0.5"). The Great Khali only has an inch on Big Show today. I think Big Show is 6'11.5 today and Schwartz 3 inches shorter, making him 6'8.5.
Rick said on 29/Aug/08
I met Undertaker in the late 90's. I actually had video footage of the meeting and there were several shots of my 6'4 brother standing next to him. Taker had a good 3 inches or so on him so the general concensus here of 6'7/6'8 is right in the ballpark. I'd say 6'7.5 and call it a day.
I met Undertaker in the late 90's. I actually had video footage of the meeting and there were several shots of my 6'4 brother standing next to him. Taker had a good 3 inches or so on him so the general concensus here of 6'7/6'8 is right in the ballpark. I'd say 6'7.5 and call it a day.
Clay said on 29/Aug/08
The lowest Big Show could be is 6'11.5.
The lowest Big Show could be is 6'11.5.
KingNick said on 29/Aug/08
What is that Big Show/UBG photo from anyway?
What is that Big Show/UBG photo from anyway?
KingNick said on 29/Aug/08
I think UBG is a legit 6'8", not taller tho. Show only looks 2" taller there, but that may be the way they're standing or something. I don't think Show is taller than 6'11" today and was a full 7' at peak at least.
I think UBG is a legit 6'8", not taller tho. Show only looks 2" taller there, but that may be the way they're standing or something. I don't think Show is taller than 6'11" today and was a full 7' at peak at least.
Derek said on 29/Aug/08
TELLEM says on 28/Aug/08
"is there proof on the internet? like youtube"?
Click Here
TELLEM says on 28/Aug/08
"is there proof on the internet? like youtube"?
Click Here
Big Show said on 29/Aug/08
James says on 28/Aug/08
On the pic with the Big Show I think Scott was standing on higher ground?
Click Here
They're standing on level ground (there's a door behind them). Schwartz has a camera advantage and is standing more straight than Big Show, but the most I could see between them is 3 inches.
James says on 28/Aug/08
There was a pic where Scott looked shorter than 6ft8 Tyler Mane as well.
You're referring to this pic: Click Here
Mane is only a fraction taller (I don't see even an inch between them. However if you brighten up the pic, you'll get a better view on their footwear. Although it's unclear what type of footwear Schwartz is wearing, it's very clear that Mane is wearing some gigantic cowboy boots (it looks almost as if he's standing on his tiptoes). Those boots probably give him a 2.5" boost, while Schwartz looks to be wearing normal dressing shoes (the seam of his pants almost hit the floor, while the seam of Mane's pants are a few inches above it). No doubt Schwartz would be taller than Mane if both were barefoot.
Click Here
Frank says on 28/Aug/08
Yes James i dont believe he's 6ft 10 and i would say the most he could be is 6ft 7
For the sake of Dolph Lundgren, Vince Vaughn, Steven Seagal, Bernie Mac, Kurt Angle, Mick Foley, Jim Carrey, Marc Singer, Big Show and George Clooney he'd better be taller than that or else you can knock off a good inch on all of these guys heights.
James says on 28/Aug/08
On the pic with the Big Show I think Scott was standing on higher ground?
Click Here
They're standing on level ground (there's a door behind them). Schwartz has a camera advantage and is standing more straight than Big Show, but the most I could see between them is 3 inches.
James says on 28/Aug/08
There was a pic where Scott looked shorter than 6ft8 Tyler Mane as well.
You're referring to this pic: Click Here
Mane is only a fraction taller (I don't see even an inch between them. However if you brighten up the pic, you'll get a better view on their footwear. Although it's unclear what type of footwear Schwartz is wearing, it's very clear that Mane is wearing some gigantic cowboy boots (it looks almost as if he's standing on his tiptoes). Those boots probably give him a 2.5" boost, while Schwartz looks to be wearing normal dressing shoes (the seam of his pants almost hit the floor, while the seam of Mane's pants are a few inches above it). No doubt Schwartz would be taller than Mane if both were barefoot.
Click Here
Frank says on 28/Aug/08
Yes James i dont believe he's 6ft 10 and i would say the most he could be is 6ft 7
For the sake of Dolph Lundgren, Vince Vaughn, Steven Seagal, Bernie Mac, Kurt Angle, Mick Foley, Jim Carrey, Marc Singer, Big Show and George Clooney he'd better be taller than that or else you can knock off a good inch on all of these guys heights.
TELLEM said on 28/Aug/08
Derek says on 28/Aug/08
Anonymous says on 28/Aug/08
"where on PWI??? i never remember wwf billing him at 5'11 it was always 6'1"
Where did I say anything about PWI? This is what Bret was billed at prior to his solo career.
is there proof on the internet? like youtube?
Derek says on 28/Aug/08
Anonymous says on 28/Aug/08
"where on PWI??? i never remember wwf billing him at 5'11 it was always 6'1"
Where did I say anything about PWI? This is what Bret was billed at prior to his solo career.
is there proof on the internet? like youtube?
Clay said on 28/Aug/08
Owen Hart was 5'10'' or just a shade under that. Under 5'8''?
Owen Hart was 5'10'' or just a shade under that. Under 5'8''?
Frank said on 28/Aug/08
Yes James i dont believe he's 6ft 10 and i would say the most he could be is 6ft 7
Yes James i dont believe he's 6ft 10 and i would say the most he could be is 6ft 7
Derek said on 28/Aug/08
Anonymous says on 28/Aug/08
"where on PWI??? i never remember wwf billing him at 5'11 it was always 6'1"
Where did I say anything about PWI? This is what Bret was billed at prior to his solo career.
Anonymous says on 28/Aug/08
"where on PWI??? i never remember wwf billing him at 5'11 it was always 6'1"
Where did I say anything about PWI? This is what Bret was billed at prior to his solo career.
Big Show said on 28/Aug/08
James says on 28/Aug/08
Frank would you rule out Scott being 6ft10
He ain't taller than 6'9 as that's what he was billed at in his early wrestling career when he wrestled under the name of Giant David.
Click Here
Click Here
The 6'10 billings came when he changed his gimmick to Joshua Ben-Gurion.
Click Here
He's a big guy though, he was nearly the same height as Big Show in a backstage pic on Star Trek. Taker never looked that tall compared to Big Show.
I think Scott Schwartz would have an inch Taker today. He looks nothing below 6'8 to me. I know PWI listed him as 6'7 when he was the Joshua Ben-Gurion gimmick, but their source is dubious to say the least, as he was billed at 6'10 when he was Joshua Ben-Gurion.
James says on 28/Aug/08
Frank would you rule out Scott being 6ft10
He ain't taller than 6'9 as that's what he was billed at in his early wrestling career when he wrestled under the name of Giant David.
Click Here
Click Here
The 6'10 billings came when he changed his gimmick to Joshua Ben-Gurion.
Click Here
He's a big guy though, he was nearly the same height as Big Show in a backstage pic on Star Trek. Taker never looked that tall compared to Big Show.
I think Scott Schwartz would have an inch Taker today. He looks nothing below 6'8 to me. I know PWI listed him as 6'7 when he was the Joshua Ben-Gurion gimmick, but their source is dubious to say the least, as he was billed at 6'10 when he was Joshua Ben-Gurion.
Anonymous said on 28/Aug/08
Derek says on 28/Aug/08
Bret was billed at 5'11" while with the Hart Foundation. He's not over that and Owen is 5'8". Bulldog had him by a good inch.
where on PWI??? i never remember wwf billing him at 5'11 it was always 6'1
Derek says on 28/Aug/08
Bret was billed at 5'11" while with the Hart Foundation. He's not over that and Owen is 5'8". Bulldog had him by a good inch.
where on PWI??? i never remember wwf billing him at 5'11 it was always 6'1
Derek said on 28/Aug/08
TELLEM says on 27/Aug/08
"are you serious? did u go to bret hart's page and seen the pic of bret next to mamun? thats way too low...remember owen hart was 5'9"
Bret was billed at 5'11" while with the Hart Foundation. He's not over that and Owen is 5'8". Bulldog had him by a good inch.
TELLEM says on 27/Aug/08
"are you serious? did u go to bret hart's page and seen the pic of bret next to mamun? thats way too low...remember owen hart was 5'9"
Bret was billed at 5'11" while with the Hart Foundation. He's not over that and Owen is 5'8". Bulldog had him by a good inch.
UNDERTAKER said on 27/Aug/08
I am really 6'10".And those who have told that I am 6'7" or 6'8" they will rest in peace.
I am really 6'10".And those who have told that I am 6'7" or 6'8" they will rest in peace.
Frank said on 27/Aug/08
Yes James i agree i would not be surprized if Taker was alittle taller than Scott
Yes James i agree i would not be surprized if Taker was alittle taller than Scott
TELLEM said on 27/Aug/08
Derek says on 26/Aug/08
Alex- 5'10.5" is possible for Bret. He had 3 inches tops on Owen, though 2.5 inches is possible
are you serious? did u go to bret hart's page and seen the pic of bret next to mamun? thats way too low...remember owen hart was 5'9
Derek says on 26/Aug/08
Alex- 5'10.5" is possible for Bret. He had 3 inches tops on Owen, though 2.5 inches is possible
are you serious? did u go to bret hart's page and seen the pic of bret next to mamun? thats way too low...remember owen hart was 5'9
Undertaker said on 27/Aug/08
I am really 6'10"
I am really 6'10"
Derek said on 26/Aug/08
Alex- 5'10.5" is possible for Bret. He had 3 inches tops on Owen, though 2.5 inches is possible.
Alex- 5'10.5" is possible for Bret. He had 3 inches tops on Owen, though 2.5 inches is possible.
Frank said on 26/Aug/08
James i never met him but i believe he was around 6ft 5 but wore footwear to appear taller...There was a guy on here along time ago and said he worked for the WWF and he said he was 6ft 4 and he said Hogan was slighty taller then him
I dont Believe Hogan lost as much height as people think i believe he's not wearing Boots with Big heels or Lifts anymore
James i never met him but i believe he was around 6ft 5 but wore footwear to appear taller...There was a guy on here along time ago and said he worked for the WWF and he said he was 6ft 4 and he said Hogan was slighty taller then him
I dont Believe Hogan lost as much height as people think i believe he's not wearing Boots with Big heels or Lifts anymore
eclectic height said on 25/Aug/08
I'm 6'2" which is tall and U.T is very tall,he was about six inches taller than me,I always estimate a persons height fairly well and estimated him at about 6'8".
I'm 6'2" which is tall and U.T is very tall,he was about six inches taller than me,I always estimate a persons height fairly well and estimated him at about 6'8".
Alex said on 24/Aug/08
Danimal, so Bret looked 5'10 to you then. I could agree on that, maybe 5'10 1/2.
Danimal, so Bret looked 5'10 to you then. I could agree on that, maybe 5'10 1/2.
Rikashiku said on 22/Aug/08
Red says on 20/Aug/08
Rikashiku says on 20/Aug/08
Red: i know that.
He was billed 6
Red says on 20/Aug/08
Rikashiku says on 20/Aug/08
Red: i know that.
He was billed 6
Clay said on 22/Aug/08
Danimal was indeed a little harsh there over that half inch.
Danimal was indeed a little harsh there over that half inch.
KingNick said on 21/Aug/08
Ahhh take that back may have found a jackpot here. Typhoon/Tugboat and Big Bossman standing NEXT TO EACH OTHER backstage Click Here
Here's Earthquake in the counter interview. Anyone know how tall Dino Bravo is?
Click Here
Here's Big Bossman vs. Earthquake Click Here
And just out of curiousity, was KoKo B Ware really this short? Click Here
Ahhh take that back may have found a jackpot here. Typhoon/Tugboat and Big Bossman standing NEXT TO EACH OTHER backstage Click Here
Here's Earthquake in the counter interview. Anyone know how tall Dino Bravo is?
Click Here
Here's Big Bossman vs. Earthquake Click Here
And just out of curiousity, was KoKo B Ware really this short? Click Here
Ghost said on 21/Aug/08
Ola says on 20/Aug/08
Ghost, you'r way off! Typhoon was no way heavier than vader and bossman was shorter than legit 6'3 typhoon (good to compare with) and bigelow was shorter than the 6'2 tops vader. and you need to delete atleast 1 inch from everyone else
I could have listed Vaders weight as little too low, but Typhoon was taller than him and he was also massive. Bossman at slightly under 6'4 is not impossible.
I would need to delete atleast 1 inch from everybody to agree with you on their heights. No offence, but that's not my goal.
Ola says on 20/Aug/08
Ghost, you'r way off! Typhoon was no way heavier than vader and bossman was shorter than legit 6'3 typhoon (good to compare with) and bigelow was shorter than the 6'2 tops vader. and you need to delete atleast 1 inch from everyone else
I could have listed Vaders weight as little too low, but Typhoon was taller than him and he was also massive. Bossman at slightly under 6'4 is not impossible.
I would need to delete atleast 1 inch from everybody to agree with you on their heights. No offence, but that's not my goal.
Red said on 21/Aug/08
Danimal, what
Danimal, what
Clay said on 20/Aug/08
I heard rumblings of a short Bret Hart (like 5'9.5/5'10) and he wore lifts during his ''Hitman'' days.
I heard rumblings of a short Bret Hart (like 5'9.5/5'10) and he wore lifts during his ''Hitman'' days.
KingNick said on 20/Aug/08
Here's an article on the new world's tallest man Click Here it's real interesting and talks about how they need a doctor's approval or be measured 6 times a day.
Here's an article on the new world's tallest man Click Here it's real interesting and talks about how they need a doctor's approval or be measured 6 times a day.
Alex2 said on 20/Aug/08
Anything under 6'7.5" for Sid IS truly a joke!
Anything under 6'7.5" for Sid IS truly a joke!
Anonymous said on 20/Aug/08
Hogan was 6'5 peak. Looks to be 6'3 now.
Hogan was 6'5 peak. Looks to be 6'3 now.
Danimal said on 20/Aug/08
Red says on 20/Aug/08
My current estimations - barefoot and midday
Undertaker - 6
Red says on 20/Aug/08
My current estimations - barefoot and midday
Undertaker - 6
Red said on 20/Aug/08
My current estimations - barefoot and midday
Undertaker - 6
My current estimations - barefoot and midday
Undertaker - 6
Red said on 20/Aug/08
Clay says on 19/Aug/08
...Because you saw him walking around in socks right Red?
No he was in ring gear and I was 4-5ft apart, we were on the same ground.
I
Clay says on 19/Aug/08
...Because you saw him walking around in socks right Red?
No he was in ring gear and I was 4-5ft apart, we were on the same ground.
I
Red said on 20/Aug/08
Rikashiku says on 20/Aug/08
Red: i know that.
He was billed 6
Rikashiku says on 20/Aug/08
Red: i know that.
He was billed 6
Rikashiku said on 20/Aug/08
Red: i know that. but someone was telling me that they heard 6'8 for undertaker in wrestling, if so that would have made him 6'6.
My vid just shows that he was billed 6'9 for WCW. so that would most likley be 6'7.
well maybe in the later years.
i think 6'8 at that time. or close to it.
Red: i know that. but someone was telling me that they heard 6'8 for undertaker in wrestling, if so that would have made him 6'6.
My vid just shows that he was billed 6'9 for WCW. so that would most likley be 6'7.
well maybe in the later years.
i think 6'8 at that time. or close to it.
Ghost said on 20/Aug/08
Here's a list big wrestlers in american promotions and estimations of their prime heights and weights.
Name: Peak height: Peak weight:
Don Leo Jonathan 6
Here's a list big wrestlers in american promotions and estimations of their prime heights and weights.
Name: Peak height: Peak weight:
Don Leo Jonathan 6
Paul said on 20/Aug/08
Very sensible estimates Mattiew. You aren't far off.
Very sensible estimates Mattiew. You aren't far off.
Clay said on 19/Aug/08
...Because you saw him walking around in socks right Red?
...Because you saw him walking around in socks right Red?
Mattiew_- said on 19/Aug/08
I think I you take back the 2 extra inches of WWF exaggeration you are right on spot on their peak heights .
Sid billed 6'9.5 --> 6'7.5
Taker billed 6'10.5 ---> 6'8.5
Nash billed 7'0.5 --> 6'10.5+ (2" to 2.5 inches taller than UT )
by the way billing Sid anywhere under 6'7 as a peak height is clearly a joke .
I think I you take back the 2 extra inches of WWF exaggeration you are right on spot on their peak heights .
Sid billed 6'9.5 --> 6'7.5
Taker billed 6'10.5 ---> 6'8.5
Nash billed 7'0.5 --> 6'10.5+ (2" to 2.5 inches taller than UT )
by the way billing Sid anywhere under 6'7 as a peak height is clearly a joke .
Frank said on 19/Aug/08
Well if Taker is 6ft6 .5 then a Peak Hogan was about 6ft 4???
Well if Taker is 6ft6 .5 then a Peak Hogan was about 6ft 4???
Me said on 19/Aug/08
Let me just say that according to this site Nash is at 6'9" & Sid is at 6'6".5. Which Nash may be 6'9" now. However he was listed at 6'10 or 11 when he played ball. Regardless, if when Nash & Sid had their staredowns is being considered to be 2.5" diff then Andre must have had 7-8 inches on Hogan, 6'6 at least at the time.Andre's forehead was huge. If it is being stated that Nash had that much on Sid then Andre definitely was over the 7' mark. IMO Sid should be 6'7.5 and Andre should be 7'1" peak & 6'11 at death. Wilt had his forehead length on Russell who was exactly 4" shorter than Wilt.Wilt had a very small head compared to Andre. Head size & proportions must be taken into account. Look at Shoemaker. You can't just say a head size bigger or smaller you must be specific on which head you are talking about, HaHa.
Let me just say that according to this site Nash is at 6'9" & Sid is at 6'6".5. Which Nash may be 6'9" now. However he was listed at 6'10 or 11 when he played ball. Regardless, if when Nash & Sid had their staredowns is being considered to be 2.5" diff then Andre must have had 7-8 inches on Hogan, 6'6 at least at the time.Andre's forehead was huge. If it is being stated that Nash had that much on Sid then Andre definitely was over the 7' mark. IMO Sid should be 6'7.5 and Andre should be 7'1" peak & 6'11 at death. Wilt had his forehead length on Russell who was exactly 4" shorter than Wilt.Wilt had a very small head compared to Andre. Head size & proportions must be taken into account. Look at Shoemaker. You can't just say a head size bigger or smaller you must be specific on which head you are talking about, HaHa.
Frank said on 19/Aug/08
Well Red i asked him personally and thats what he told me and he looked it
Besides i wasnt going to tell him he's a Liar and that hes only 6ft 7 even if i thought he looked that height :o)
Well Red i asked him personally and thats what he told me and he looked it
Besides i wasnt going to tell him he's a Liar and that hes only 6ft 7 even if i thought he looked that height :o)
Alex2 said on 19/Aug/08
Billed heights arnet always that off, sometimes they are dead on or even too low (Henry, Christian, Cena) I have seen Taker listed anywhere from 6'8-6'11 throughout his career, never have I seen him listed below 6'8". He was 6'8" peak no less, live with it, gees.
Billed heights arnet always that off, sometimes they are dead on or even too low (Henry, Christian, Cena) I have seen Taker listed anywhere from 6'8-6'11 throughout his career, never have I seen him listed below 6'8". He was 6'8" peak no less, live with it, gees.
Alex2 said on 19/Aug/08
Oh dear Ola telling everyoine on Youtube Hogans 6'3" laughable, i found his Youtube account Click Here
Oh dear Ola telling everyoine on Youtube Hogans 6'3" laughable, i found his Youtube account Click Here
mike said on 19/Aug/08
when taker went face to face with giant gonzales at the 1993 royal rumble for the first time,taker appeared to be around 9 inches shorter.imo taker was around 6,9" then,gonzales was around 7,6".nowadays i give taker 6,7.5".
when taker went face to face with giant gonzales at the 1993 royal rumble for the first time,taker appeared to be around 9 inches shorter.imo taker was around 6,9" then,gonzales was around 7,6".nowadays i give taker 6,7.5".
Red said on 19/Aug/08
Rikashiku says on 19/Aug/08
6 foot 9 and three hundred and nineteen pounds.
Mean Mark!
Billed heights are NOT real height. Most of the billed heights are height in shoes/boots + an extra inch. So again one more proof that he was between 6
Rikashiku says on 19/Aug/08
6 foot 9 and three hundred and nineteen pounds.
Mean Mark!
Billed heights are NOT real height. Most of the billed heights are height in shoes/boots + an extra inch. So again one more proof that he was between 6
Rikashiku said on 19/Aug/08
6 foot 9 and three hundred and nineteen pounds.
Mean Mark!
Click Here
someone deleted it off youtube.
but i found the vid where they list him as 6'9.
against Lex Luger.
6 foot 9 and three hundred and nineteen pounds.
Mean Mark!
Click Here
someone deleted it off youtube.
but i found the vid where they list him as 6'9.
against Lex Luger.
Frank said on 18/Aug/08
Red,I could be wrong but Taker is still Taller and i seen both men and i was close to both of them... Red Sid does not Tilt his head back with shorter men
He does that with men taller then him
Red,I could be wrong but Taker is still Taller and i seen both men and i was close to both of them... Red Sid does not Tilt his head back with shorter men
He does that with men taller then him
tuga said on 18/Aug/08
Taker barelly taller than hogan?? Eventough taker is a sloucher there
Taker barelly taller than hogan?? Eventough taker is a sloucher there
KingNick said on 18/Aug/08
Red says on 18/Aug/08
Frank says on 15/Aug/08
...Sid always Tilts his head back to look about .05 shorter But if Sid did not Tilt his head back there might be an inch difference??
Tilting the head back that much makes you shorter not taller
Can someone take one of the staredowns between UT and Sid where Sid has his had tilt back and photoshop it to Sid having his head straight?
Red says on 18/Aug/08
Frank says on 15/Aug/08
...Sid always Tilts his head back to look about .05 shorter But if Sid did not Tilt his head back there might be an inch difference??
Tilting the head back that much makes you shorter not taller
Can someone take one of the staredowns between UT and Sid where Sid has his had tilt back and photoshop it to Sid having his head straight?
Alex2 said on 18/Aug/08
Red, look at my video I posted below with Undertaker as Mean Mark (WCW) before WWE/WWF and he has an easy foot on 5'9" Teddy Long. He wasngt below 6'8" peak, and who even says Sid was 6'7" Ive never seen him listed below 6'8" He could have been a weak 6'8" guy.
Red, look at my video I posted below with Undertaker as Mean Mark (WCW) before WWE/WWF and he has an easy foot on 5'9" Teddy Long. He wasngt below 6'8" peak, and who even says Sid was 6'7" Ive never seen him listed below 6'8" He could have been a weak 6'8" guy.
Red said on 18/Aug/08
Frank, eye level isn
Frank, eye level isn
Frank said on 18/Aug/08
Not really Red it makes it harder to judge and it makes your eye level higher
Anyway Taker is taller than Sid and i believe Sid wore lifts I seen him in street clothes and he did not look as tall as i thought he would be
Not really Red it makes it harder to judge and it makes your eye level higher
Anyway Taker is taller than Sid and i believe Sid wore lifts I seen him in street clothes and he did not look as tall as i thought he would be
Red said on 18/Aug/08
Frank says on 15/Aug/08
...Sid always Tilts his head back to look about .05 shorter But if Sid did not Tilt his head back there might be an inch difference??
Tilting the head back that much makes you shorter not taller
Frank says on 15/Aug/08
...Sid always Tilts his head back to look about .05 shorter But if Sid did not Tilt his head back there might be an inch difference??
Tilting the head back that much makes you shorter not taller
tuga said on 17/Aug/08
KingNick, I agree, both men would be same height barefoot.
Clay says on 17/Aug/08
Taker for sure had a fottwear advantage in that staredown with Khali. 100%.
Taker
KingNick, I agree, both men would be same height barefoot.
Clay says on 17/Aug/08
Taker for sure had a fottwear advantage in that staredown with Khali. 100%.
Taker
Red said on 17/Aug/08
Much people arround here are claiming that Undertaker is a full inch taller than Sid - Wrong!! thats because of bad pictures and camera positions!
Taker is 0.5 - 1cm or max 0.5 inches taller than Sid
They
Much people arround here are claiming that Undertaker is a full inch taller than Sid - Wrong!! thats because of bad pictures and camera positions!
Taker is 0.5 - 1cm or max 0.5 inches taller than Sid
They
Clay said on 17/Aug/08
Taker for sure had a fottwear advantage in that staredown with Khali. 100%.
Taker for sure had a fottwear advantage in that staredown with Khali. 100%.
KingNick said on 16/Aug/08
Clay says on 15/Aug/08
Rob fist had Sid at a miserable 6'6'', completely ripping him off then upgraded him to 6'6.5. The man needs to be at least at 6'7.5 IMO.
Very much agreed
JT, I'm beginning to wonder about that Yankem/UT pic. I use to think that Yankem had .5" on him (UT does have the camera advantage like you said) but Yankem has a fro going at the time. UT's head is very long as we pointed out, I'm beginning to wonder if they're maybe both the same size barefoot.
It makes more sense since Yankem/Jacobs clearly wore/wear lifts as Kane. The point was to appear much taller than UT.
Clay says on 15/Aug/08
Rob fist had Sid at a miserable 6'6'', completely ripping him off then upgraded him to 6'6.5. The man needs to be at least at 6'7.5 IMO.
Very much agreed
JT, I'm beginning to wonder about that Yankem/UT pic. I use to think that Yankem had .5" on him (UT does have the camera advantage like you said) but Yankem has a fro going at the time. UT's head is very long as we pointed out, I'm beginning to wonder if they're maybe both the same size barefoot.
It makes more sense since Yankem/Jacobs clearly wore/wear lifts as Kane. The point was to appear much taller than UT.
Alex2 said on 16/Aug/08
Ehh Spivey was over 6'6"... Danimal, you serious? I think If Sid does return theyd be the exact same height, I don't see sid being taller at all, and Sid's had some injuries so could have lost height.
Ehh Spivey was over 6'6"... Danimal, you serious? I think If Sid does return theyd be the exact same height, I don't see sid being taller at all, and Sid's had some injuries so could have lost height.
JT said on 15/Aug/08
Red says on 15/Aug/08
Click Here that
Red says on 15/Aug/08
Click Here that
TELLEM said on 15/Aug/08
Click Here
taker next to 6'6 dan spivey...yup taker's height here is correct
Click Here
taker next to 6'6 dan spivey...yup taker's height here is correct
Clay said on 15/Aug/08
Rob fist had Sid at a miserable 6'6'', completely ripping him off then upgraded him to 6'6.5. The man needs to be at least at 6'7.5 IMO.
Rob fist had Sid at a miserable 6'6'', completely ripping him off then upgraded him to 6'6.5. The man needs to be at least at 6'7.5 IMO.
Danimal said on 15/Aug/08
Frank says on 14/Aug/08
NashOwnsAll, That could be right Taker is about 1.5 inches shorter than Nash when he stands straigt
WAS PRE-2001. NO WAY would he measure up to a peak Nash that way today and I would bet the farm that Sid would have .5-1" on Taker today.
Frank says on 14/Aug/08
NashOwnsAll, That could be right Taker is about 1.5 inches shorter than Nash when he stands straigt
WAS PRE-2001. NO WAY would he measure up to a peak Nash that way today and I would bet the farm that Sid would have .5-1" on Taker today.
NashOwnsAll said on 15/Aug/08
I'm quite pleased with that picture I put together! Thanks for the comments everyone!
Sid makes a good yardstick since his posture and footware have been very consistent during his most of his career. And sid just happens to stare down at both wrestlers in similar positions relative to the camera within the space of 2 years lol
The gap between Undertaker and Sid looks like 1 inch or maybe a little less than an inch. Nash has around 2.5 inches on Sid and between 1.25 - 1.5 inches on Undertaker.
I'm quite pleased with that picture I put together! Thanks for the comments everyone!
Sid makes a good yardstick since his posture and footware have been very consistent during his most of his career. And sid just happens to stare down at both wrestlers in similar positions relative to the camera within the space of 2 years lol
The gap between Undertaker and Sid looks like 1 inch or maybe a little less than an inch. Nash has around 2.5 inches on Sid and between 1.25 - 1.5 inches on Undertaker.
Frank said on 15/Aug/08
Taker is taller and Sid always Tilts his head back to look about .05 shorter
But if Sid did not Tilt his head back there might be an inch difference??
Taker is taller and Sid always Tilts his head back to look about .05 shorter
But if Sid did not Tilt his head back there might be an inch difference??
Alex2 said on 15/Aug/08
Thankyou everyone :) I think we need to upgrade sid :)
Thankyou everyone :) I think we need to upgrade sid :)
KingNick said on 14/Aug/08
NashOwnsAll, very nice pics, love that match/segment.
Click Here
I have to play devil's advocate though, I think Undertaker had a footwear advantage. If you look, he has at least FULL inch on Sid and his eyes are higher up. Any other pic or staredown you look at between them, Undertaker has a lower eye level but is still slightly taller.
Click Here
I think Sid 6'7.5", UT 6'8"
NashOwnsAll, very nice pics, love that match/segment.
Click Here
I have to play devil's advocate though, I think Undertaker had a footwear advantage. If you look, he has at least FULL inch on Sid and his eyes are higher up. Any other pic or staredown you look at between them, Undertaker has a lower eye level but is still slightly taller.
Click Here
I think Sid 6'7.5", UT 6'8"
Robby said on 14/Aug/08
I love the comparison NashOwnsAll. I have always felt that Sid and Taker were very close with Taker edging Sid slightly no more then 1". Nash I thought has always been no more then 2" taller then Taker. maybe even less. this is what I think Nash 6'10"(peak) now 6'9". Taker 6'8"(peak) now 6'7.5". Sid 6'7" (peak) now 6'6".5"
I love the comparison NashOwnsAll. I have always felt that Sid and Taker were very close with Taker edging Sid slightly no more then 1". Nash I thought has always been no more then 2" taller then Taker. maybe even less. this is what I think Nash 6'10"(peak) now 6'9". Taker 6'8"(peak) now 6'7.5". Sid 6'7" (peak) now 6'6".5"
tuga said on 14/Aug/08
NashOwnsAll says on 14/Aug/08
Taker, Sid, Nash in comparison: What do you think?
Really great comparison, knowing how HUGE nash was/is maybe this opens some eyes and forget the peaks 6'6 sid and 6'7 taker...
See the difference between nash and a 6'7 man...
Click Here
NashOwnsAll says on 14/Aug/08
Taker, Sid, Nash in comparison: What do you think?
Really great comparison, knowing how HUGE nash was/is maybe this opens some eyes and forget the peaks 6'6 sid and 6'7 taker...
See the difference between nash and a 6'7 man...
Click Here
Frank said on 14/Aug/08
NashOwnsAll, That could be right Taker is about 1.5 inches shorter than Nash when he stands straigt
NashOwnsAll, That could be right Taker is about 1.5 inches shorter than Nash when he stands straigt
Alex2 said on 14/Aug/08
Anonymous says on 13/Aug/08
Heights of those recently mentioned, I was careful to make sure.
UT 6'6.5 - 7
Snitsky 6'7
Heidenreich 6'4
ATrain 6'7.5
Akebono 6'9
Wrong on all occasions im afraid.
Anonymous says on 13/Aug/08
Heights of those recently mentioned, I was careful to make sure.
UT 6'6.5 - 7
Snitsky 6'7
Heidenreich 6'4
ATrain 6'7.5
Akebono 6'9
Wrong on all occasions im afraid.
Alex2 said on 14/Aug/08
NashOwnsAll, thats good apart from youve drawn takers head line a little high.
NashOwnsAll, thats good apart from youve drawn takers head line a little high.
Alex2 said on 14/Aug/08
Ola, apart from Id have Snitsky at at least 6'5" and Heidenreich at 6'6".
Ola, apart from Id have Snitsky at at least 6'5" and Heidenreich at 6'6".
Frank said on 14/Aug/08
Very Good OLA i must say :o) That list could be right
Very Good OLA i must say :o) That list could be right
Atoadaso said on 14/Aug/08
Maybe Undertaker appears shorter due to his massive forehead accounting for the deceiving height in many photos. Somebody could perceive height from their eye level, just as when Khali first appeared so much taller than Big Show because of this illusion.
Maybe Undertaker appears shorter due to his massive forehead accounting for the deceiving height in many photos. Somebody could perceive height from their eye level, just as when Khali first appeared so much taller than Big Show because of this illusion.
Alex2 said on 13/Aug/08
Ola says on 13/Aug/08
UT 6'7 (peak atleast 6'7 1/2)
Snitsky 6'4
Heidenreich 6'5
ATrain 6'6
Akebono 6'7 1/2
Your egtting betetr lol, thats a fair list.
Ola says on 13/Aug/08
UT 6'7 (peak atleast 6'7 1/2)
Snitsky 6'4
Heidenreich 6'5
ATrain 6'6
Akebono 6'7 1/2
Your egtting betetr lol, thats a fair list.
KingNick said on 13/Aug/08
Drexyl says on 13/Aug/08
Heidenreich appears to be leaning forward in the picture with Taker, but his hair also makes him look taller than he is. I see two and a half inches between them there. Look how much longer Taker's forehead is.
Great point. That's why UT's height is so deceiving.
Drexyl says on 13/Aug/08
Heidenreich appears to be leaning forward in the picture with Taker, but his hair also makes him look taller than he is. I see two and a half inches between them there. Look how much longer Taker's forehead is.
Great point. That's why UT's height is so deceiving.
Frank said on 13/Aug/08
Whats Funny Vegas thought Heidenreich looked very tall but he did not think Taker and Kane looked that tall mean while Taker and Kane are alot taller than Heidenreich :o)
Whats Funny Vegas thought Heidenreich looked very tall but he did not think Taker and Kane looked that tall mean while Taker and Kane are alot taller than Heidenreich :o)
Drexyl said on 13/Aug/08
Heidenreich appears to be leaning forward in the picture with Taker, but his hair also makes him look taller than he is. I see two and a half inches between them there. Look how much longer Taker's forehead is.
Heidenreich appears to be leaning forward in the picture with Taker, but his hair also makes him look taller than he is. I see two and a half inches between them there. Look how much longer Taker's forehead is.
Anonymous said on 13/Aug/08
Heights of those recently mentioned, I was careful to make sure.
UT 6'6.5 - 7
Snitsky 6'7
Heidenreich 6'4
ATrain 6'7.5
Akebono 6'9
Heights of those recently mentioned, I was careful to make sure.
UT 6'6.5 - 7
Snitsky 6'7
Heidenreich 6'4
ATrain 6'7.5
Akebono 6'9
Alex2 said on 13/Aug/08
Vegas were aere you when we need you lol.
Vegas were aere you when we need you lol.
hs2008 said on 13/Aug/08
Nice find JT, Snitsky's college listing. I don't think he's any less than 6'5" but that college listing is certainly inflated quite a bit, shock horror. Heidenreich looked 6'5.5" or 6'6" which would put Undertaker still at 6'7.5" or 6'8" in 2005 or whenever that casket match was.
Nice find JT, Snitsky's college listing. I don't think he's any less than 6'5" but that college listing is certainly inflated quite a bit, shock horror. Heidenreich looked 6'5.5" or 6'6" which would put Undertaker still at 6'7.5" or 6'8" in 2005 or whenever that casket match was.
Big Show said on 13/Aug/08
JT says on 12/Aug/08
Click Here Click Here Snitsky had a 6'7" listing entering college Click Here though IMO he's closer to 6'5".
IIRC, Vegas saw Heidenreich and thought he looked huge (at least 6'6") but did not see Taker being more than 6'7" tops.
The first pic you posted is from that staredown in the lockerroom before Heidenreich's casket match with Undertaker. Snitsky looks slightly taller to me, but in the other staredown of the two it's the other way around. Does Snitsky wear lifts from time to time? I never paid attention to his footwear, so I wouldn't know, but he was always billed as a monster.
JT says on 12/Aug/08
Click Here Click Here Snitsky had a 6'7" listing entering college Click Here though IMO he's closer to 6'5".
IIRC, Vegas saw Heidenreich and thought he looked huge (at least 6'6") but did not see Taker being more than 6'7" tops.
The first pic you posted is from that staredown in the lockerroom before Heidenreich's casket match with Undertaker. Snitsky looks slightly taller to me, but in the other staredown of the two it's the other way around. Does Snitsky wear lifts from time to time? I never paid attention to his footwear, so I wouldn't know, but he was always billed as a monster.
Rikashiku said on 13/Aug/08
Heidenreich likely 6'5. he had an nose over Road Warrior Animal.
His billed was 6'7. Snisky billed was mostly 6'6.
UT has 2 inches on Heidenreich.
Kane has 2 inches on snisky
Heidenreich likely 6'5. he had an nose over Road Warrior Animal.
His billed was 6'7. Snisky billed was mostly 6'6.
UT has 2 inches on Heidenreich.
Kane has 2 inches on snisky
Danimal said on 13/Aug/08
Alex2 says on 12/Aug/08
Click Here - A peak Undertaker as Mean Mark in late 80's easily has 1 foot on 5'9" Teddy Long.
The man was not over 6'8". He said it himself in articles.
Alex2 says on 12/Aug/08
Click Here - A peak Undertaker as Mean Mark in late 80's easily has 1 foot on 5'9" Teddy Long.
The man was not over 6'8". He said it himself in articles.
JT said on 12/Aug/08
Click Here Click Here Snitsky had a 6'7" listing entering college Click Here though IMO he's closer to 6'5".
IIRC, Vegas saw Heidenreich and thought he looked huge (at least 6'6") but did not see Taker being more than 6'7" tops.
Click Here Click Here Snitsky had a 6'7" listing entering college Click Here though IMO he's closer to 6'5".
IIRC, Vegas saw Heidenreich and thought he looked huge (at least 6'6") but did not see Taker being more than 6'7" tops.
Alex2 said on 12/Aug/08
Click Here - A peak Undertaker as Mean Mark in late 80's easily has 1 foot on 5'9" Teddy Long.
Click Here - A peak Undertaker as Mean Mark in late 80's easily has 1 foot on 5'9" Teddy Long.
Derek said on 12/Aug/08
Snitsky is 6'4". He was the same as Randy Orton. Heidenreich had about an inch on him, putting him at 6'5". Taker would be about 6'7" as he had about 2 inches on Heidenreich.
Snitsky is 6'4". He was the same as Randy Orton. Heidenreich had about an inch on him, putting him at 6'5". Taker would be about 6'7" as he had about 2 inches on Heidenreich.
Frank said on 12/Aug/08
Heidenreich is probably a Legit 6ft 5 and i believe he was listed @ that when he first came into the WWE
Heidenreich is probably a Legit 6ft 5 and i believe he was listed @ that when he first came into the WWE
Ray said on 12/Aug/08
Heidenreich looks to have 1-2" on Snitsky which makes Heidenreich 6'6" or so; Taker had Heidenreich by 2" or so.
Heidenreich looks to have 1-2" on Snitsky which makes Heidenreich 6'6" or so; Taker had Heidenreich by 2" or so.
KingNick said on 12/Aug/08
[Editor Rob: ah that guy holds the record I think for the number of different names he's tried to use, it will be good to wipe the smirk of his face now that all his posts are deleted.]
Rob, thank you :>)
Vegas, was it you that met Heidereich and said he was humongous?
[Editor Rob: ah that guy holds the record I think for the number of different names he's tried to use, it will be good to wipe the smirk of his face now that all his posts are deleted.]
Rob, thank you :>)
Vegas, was it you that met Heidereich and said he was humongous?
Drexyl said on 12/Aug/08
Heidenreich looks a bit taller than Snitsky in all their staredowns, but I don't think there's more than half an inch difference. Probably even less.
That's without taking into account footwear though.
Heidenreich looks a bit taller than Snitsky in all their staredowns, but I don't think there's more than half an inch difference. Probably even less.
That's without taking into account footwear though.
JIM POWERS said on 12/Aug/08
a train and akebono had a staredown. u see the boots he had in wwe compared to the ones in new japan. now my question is? if albert is 6'6'' with boots 6'7''-6'7.5, then it makes taker 6'7.5-6'8'', akebono is either the same height or at least a half an inch taller than taker. and nash not far over him. this would mean nash is only 6'9. legit
a train and akebono had a staredown. u see the boots he had in wwe compared to the ones in new japan. now my question is? if albert is 6'6'' with boots 6'7''-6'7.5, then it makes taker 6'7.5-6'8'', akebono is either the same height or at least a half an inch taller than taker. and nash not far over him. this would mean nash is only 6'9. legit
kevin o shea said on 12/Aug/08
that height chart that red posted? dont mean nothin. and newsflash.taker is 6'8'' barefoot BAREFOOT red! and gonzalez was 7'6'' BAREFOOT! now on that height chart, theyre clearly wearing their boots. so I would give taker anywhere from 6'9''-6'10'' tops and gonzalez 7'8''-7'9'' he had platforms on. and they had tried to boost him as close to 8 ft as possible and taker as close to 7 ft as possible. for taker anywhere from 1-2 inches on his boots. and gonzalez anywhere from 2-3 on his. why do u think that gonzalez couldnt move so quickly as he had in wcw. im aware of his condition, but still 2 years later? cmon see it my way and it makes sense. youll thank me tomorrow
that height chart that red posted? dont mean nothin. and newsflash.taker is 6'8'' barefoot BAREFOOT red! and gonzalez was 7'6'' BAREFOOT! now on that height chart, theyre clearly wearing their boots. so I would give taker anywhere from 6'9''-6'10'' tops and gonzalez 7'8''-7'9'' he had platforms on. and they had tried to boost him as close to 8 ft as possible and taker as close to 7 ft as possible. for taker anywhere from 1-2 inches on his boots. and gonzalez anywhere from 2-3 on his. why do u think that gonzalez couldnt move so quickly as he had in wcw. im aware of his condition, but still 2 years later? cmon see it my way and it makes sense. youll thank me tomorrow
Big Show said on 12/Aug/08
Alex2 says on 11/Aug/08
Lol, weve talked about Heidenrich before, he was MUCH taller than Snitsky, he was around 6'7" Ask Vegas to show you the photos of him when He met him, I think we all peg him at 6'6-6'7" from Vegas's photos.
When Heidenreich had his casket match with Undertaker, there was a backstage locker room segment in which Heidenreich is confronted by Snitsky. From what I remember, Snitsky was slightly taller. I have the dvd at home, so I'll cap some pictures of it this weekend. No way is Heidenreich much taller, at best he's the same height as Snitsky.
Alex2 says on 11/Aug/08
Lol, weve talked about Heidenrich before, he was MUCH taller than Snitsky, he was around 6'7" Ask Vegas to show you the photos of him when He met him, I think we all peg him at 6'6-6'7" from Vegas's photos.
When Heidenreich had his casket match with Undertaker, there was a backstage locker room segment in which Heidenreich is confronted by Snitsky. From what I remember, Snitsky was slightly taller. I have the dvd at home, so I'll cap some pictures of it this weekend. No way is Heidenreich much taller, at best he's the same height as Snitsky.
JT said on 11/Aug/08
Standing pretty straight here Click Here and with feet similarly spread Click Here
Compare that to how Nash measured up to Gonzalez Click Here(original photo courtesy of Chris on this site).
Standing pretty straight here Click Here and with feet similarly spread Click Here
Compare that to how Nash measured up to Gonzalez Click Here(original photo courtesy of Chris on this site).
Clay said on 11/Aug/08
Henry, only in his dreams is Undertaker only 4 inches shorter than Khali bud.
Henry, only in his dreams is Undertaker only 4 inches shorter than Khali bud.
Alex2 said on 11/Aug/08
Lol, weve talked about Heidenrich before, he was MUCH taller than Snitsky, he was around 6'7" Ask Vegas to show you the photos of him when He met him, I think we all peg him at 6'6-6'7" from Vegas's photos.
Lol, weve talked about Heidenrich before, he was MUCH taller than Snitsky, he was around 6'7" Ask Vegas to show you the photos of him when He met him, I think we all peg him at 6'6-6'7" from Vegas's photos.
Danimal said on 11/Aug/08
What is going on here!!!???? There is like a dozen posts in a ROW by all NEW posters who all claim he is actually 6'10" barefeet minimum??? I mean ROB, can you check in to see if this is the SAME person who keeps changing his name? It's ridiculous. Taker was NEVER over 6'8". EVER!!! Wrestlers are not their BILLED heights KIDDIES!!!!
Editor Rob
What is going on here!!!???? There is like a dozen posts in a ROW by all NEW posters who all claim he is actually 6'10" barefeet minimum??? I mean ROB, can you check in to see if this is the SAME person who keeps changing his name? It's ridiculous. Taker was NEVER over 6'8". EVER!!! Wrestlers are not their BILLED heights KIDDIES!!!!
Editor Rob ah that guy holds the record I think for the number of different names he's tried to use, it will be good to wipe the smirk of his face now that all his posts are deleted.
KingNick said on 11/Aug/08
Claire says on 10/Aug/08
For crying out loud Danimal.. If he claimed 6'8 himself, let me see the proof and... why doesn't this site upgrade his listed site to 6'8 instead of 6'7.5?
Why does no one read my posts? ;>(
Brain, Grace, Claire, Dutch, anyone who thinks Undertaker is 6'10", PLEASE read my post from August 9. I'll give you candy. Even if you don't agree, just acknowledge you read it!
Claire says on 10/Aug/08
For crying out loud Danimal.. If he claimed 6'8 himself, let me see the proof and... why doesn't this site upgrade his listed site to 6'8 instead of 6'7.5?
Why does no one read my posts? ;>(
Brain, Grace, Claire, Dutch, anyone who thinks Undertaker is 6'10", PLEASE read my post from August 9. I'll give you candy. Even if you don't agree, just acknowledge you read it!
Alex2 said on 11/Aug/08
Has anyone noticed how Undertaker has a very bad posture? In nearly ever photo I see him in he is always either has his legs spread apart so is not standing straight enough or is always leaning forward, like he used to do with Mean Gene when interviewed, even when he stodd by Gonzalez he never stood fully straight, I think thats why alot of people have suspicions over his height.
Has anyone noticed how Undertaker has a very bad posture? In nearly ever photo I see him in he is always either has his legs spread apart so is not standing straight enough or is always leaning forward, like he used to do with Mean Gene when interviewed, even when he stodd by Gonzalez he never stood fully straight, I think thats why alot of people have suspicions over his height.
miko said on 11/Aug/08
It's funny how people claim Undertaker is 6"9 when he is clearly shorter than 6"8 maximum Kane. Kane does wear lifts, but Undertaker doesn't wear small boots either.
As of 2008, he is no taller than the height Rob has him listed at.
It's funny how people claim Undertaker is 6"9 when he is clearly shorter than 6"8 maximum Kane. Kane does wear lifts, but Undertaker doesn't wear small boots either.
As of 2008, he is no taller than the height Rob has him listed at.
Ray said on 11/Aug/08
That's a great picture Stacey showing Taker's height over Hogan; I'd say Taker had 2-3" on him back then.
That's a great picture Stacey showing Taker's height over Hogan; I'd say Taker had 2-3" on him back then.
Big Show said on 11/Aug/08
Danimal says on 10/Aug/08
He has been billed at 6'8" AND HAS CLAIMED 6'8" FOR HIMSELF for crying out loud!!! The guy was NEVER over that. What don't you people understand??? He did NOT have 3" on 6'6" A-Train!!!
Too many people here buy the billed heights of Wrestlers! 6'11.5 to 7' for Kevin Nash? He's been billed at heights up to 7'1 but also as low as 6'10. Even in his match with The Giant (Big Show), who was billed at an exaggerated height of 7'4, he was referred to as 6'10. Does anyone here also believe the difference between them was 6 inches?
Nate says on 9/Aug/08
The Undertaker next to other tall guys like Test, Heidenrich, A-Train, Sid and etc.. appeared taller, so this big guy as to at least be 6'9, 6'9.5 or so
Yeah he was taller than them, but that doesn't make him 6'9, unless you believe all their billed heights!
Wasn't Heidenreich a little shorter than Snitsky and wasn't Snitsky shorter or the same height as 6'4.75 NFL player Ben Roethlisberger (not sure if I spelled his name correct). And I didn't see 5 inches between Taker and Heidenreich.
Danimal says on 10/Aug/08
He has been billed at 6'8" AND HAS CLAIMED 6'8" FOR HIMSELF for crying out loud!!! The guy was NEVER over that. What don't you people understand??? He did NOT have 3" on 6'6" A-Train!!!
Too many people here buy the billed heights of Wrestlers! 6'11.5 to 7' for Kevin Nash? He's been billed at heights up to 7'1 but also as low as 6'10. Even in his match with The Giant (Big Show), who was billed at an exaggerated height of 7'4, he was referred to as 6'10. Does anyone here also believe the difference between them was 6 inches?
Nate says on 9/Aug/08
The Undertaker next to other tall guys like Test, Heidenrich, A-Train, Sid and etc.. appeared taller, so this big guy as to at least be 6'9, 6'9.5 or so
Yeah he was taller than them, but that doesn't make him 6'9, unless you believe all their billed heights!
Wasn't Heidenreich a little shorter than Snitsky and wasn't Snitsky shorter or the same height as 6'4.75 NFL player Ben Roethlisberger (not sure if I spelled his name correct). And I didn't see 5 inches between Taker and Heidenreich.
Big Show said on 11/Aug/08
Alex2 says on 10/Aug/08
A-train could be over 6'6" though, just a thought. If so, not by much.
That would mean that the Japanese went as far as billing him as a GIANT, and then list him below his actual height. I find that a bit hard to swallow. The Japanese are the ones who billed Khali & Silva at 7'6.5, so it's not like they don't exaggerate heights.
Alex2 says on 10/Aug/08
A-train could be over 6'6" though, just a thought. If so, not by much.
That would mean that the Japanese went as far as billing him as a GIANT, and then list him below his actual height. I find that a bit hard to swallow. The Japanese are the ones who billed Khali & Silva at 7'6.5, so it's not like they don't exaggerate heights.
Danimal said on 10/Aug/08
Alex2 says on 10/Aug/08
A-train could be over 6'6" though, just a thought. If so, not by much.
He was billed at 6'6" in football. He was not over that. If anything he could be as low as 6'5.5".
Alex2 says on 10/Aug/08
A-train could be over 6'6" though, just a thought. If so, not by much.
He was billed at 6'6" in football. He was not over that. If anything he could be as low as 6'5.5".
kevin o shea said on 10/Aug/08
hey red, that height chart, dont mean nothin!
hey red, that height chart, dont mean nothin!
Alex2 said on 10/Aug/08
A-train could be over 6'6" though, just a thought. If so, not by much.
A-train could be over 6'6" though, just a thought. If so, not by much.
Alex said on 10/Aug/08
UT came more to Khali's eye level or even just under if UT wasn't looking up at him. Could be as much as 6 inches difference.
UT came more to Khali's eye level or even just under if UT wasn't looking up at him. Could be as much as 6 inches difference.
Danimal said on 10/Aug/08
Derek says on 9/Aug/08
The Undertaker is at least 6'8.5 to 6'9 barefoot. In boots he is 6'10. Alex2, look at all the tall men he has been taller than, you do the math.
He has been billed at 6'8" AND HAS CLAIMED 6'8" FOR HIMSELF for crying out loud!!! The guy was NEVER over that. What don't you people understand??? He did NOT have 3" on 6'6" A-Train!!!
Derek says on 9/Aug/08
The Undertaker is at least 6'8.5 to 6'9 barefoot. In boots he is 6'10. Alex2, look at all the tall men he has been taller than, you do the math.
He has been billed at 6'8" AND HAS CLAIMED 6'8" FOR HIMSELF for crying out loud!!! The guy was NEVER over that. What don't you people understand??? He did NOT have 3" on 6'6" A-Train!!!
Alex2 said on 9/Aug/08
The max Taker could have been is 6'8.5" or 6'8.25" Danimal, I have never heard of him claiming "only" 6'8" as his height at one time but when I heard him claim that it was in the "This Is my yard" DVD when he constantly said "Im 6'8"-6'9" not just 6'8" He could be lying in between the two but I still think a solid 6'8" peak sounds right, no more, no less.
The max Taker could have been is 6'8.5" or 6'8.25" Danimal, I have never heard of him claiming "only" 6'8" as his height at one time but when I heard him claim that it was in the "This Is my yard" DVD when he constantly said "Im 6'8"-6'9" not just 6'8" He could be lying in between the two but I still think a solid 6'8" peak sounds right, no more, no less.
Clay said on 9/Aug/08
Taker didn't come within 4 inches of Khali, sorry. He came to his eyebrows, so thats at least 5 inches and he may have had a significant footwear advantage becasue later staredowns saw about a 6 inch gap between him and Khali. Still he's at least 6'7/6'7.5.
Taker didn't come within 4 inches of Khali, sorry. He came to his eyebrows, so thats at least 5 inches and he may have had a significant footwear advantage becasue later staredowns saw about a 6 inch gap between him and Khali. Still he's at least 6'7/6'7.5.
Big Show said on 9/Aug/08
Danimal says on 8/Aug/08
Big Show: the most interesting staredown that shows a POST 2000 height shrinkage for Taker is his FACE-OFF with Viscera in 1999, when Viscera wanted to become part of the ministry. Taker walked right up to him on solid ground outside of the ring (this was Takers PEAK height) and Taker had close to 2" on Viscera. So yeah, he could have been close to 6'8" PRE-2001 and post about 6'6.5". The man lost a solid inch at that point. Alex also noticed this. HE used to stack up pretty well next to Kane with HUGE boots in the late 90's. NO WAY would Taker only come in within 1" with KAne if Kane sported those huge late 90's boots. Taker may be as low as 6'6" today imo.
Did that staredown happen on the 1999 Royal Rumble? If so I'll try to look it up and post some pictures of it.
Danimal says on 8/Aug/08
Big Show: the most interesting staredown that shows a POST 2000 height shrinkage for Taker is his FACE-OFF with Viscera in 1999, when Viscera wanted to become part of the ministry. Taker walked right up to him on solid ground outside of the ring (this was Takers PEAK height) and Taker had close to 2" on Viscera. So yeah, he could have been close to 6'8" PRE-2001 and post about 6'6.5". The man lost a solid inch at that point. Alex also noticed this. HE used to stack up pretty well next to Kane with HUGE boots in the late 90's. NO WAY would Taker only come in within 1" with KAne if Kane sported those huge late 90's boots. Taker may be as low as 6'6" today imo.
Did that staredown happen on the 1999 Royal Rumble? If so I'll try to look it up and post some pictures of it.
miko said on 9/Aug/08
Undertaker is about 5 inches shorter than Khali, it could even be 6 inches. I have never seen 4 inches - if there is then find a photo.
A 7"1 Khali would result in a 6"7 Undertaker.
Undertaker is about 5 inches shorter than Khali, it could even be 6 inches. I have never seen 4 inches - if there is then find a photo.
A 7"1 Khali would result in a 6"7 Undertaker.
Big Show said on 9/Aug/08
Ghost says on 8/Aug/08
Big show,
Kane was also very close in height with 6'6,5 Big daddy V.
He had 1 inch on Taker when he wore lifts.
When Kane made his debut in the WWF in 1997 he had 2 inches on Taker. I haven't seen Kane wearing those big boots in recent confrontations with Taker, but Kane still had an inch on him. Look for the match of Undertaker and Isaac Yankem on Youtube. Glen Jacobs isn't wearing any lifts there and he's still taller than the Undertaker.
Ghost says on 8/Aug/08
Big show,
Kane was also very close in height with 6'6,5 Big daddy V.
He had 1 inch on Taker when he wore lifts.
When Kane made his debut in the WWF in 1997 he had 2 inches on Taker. I haven't seen Kane wearing those big boots in recent confrontations with Taker, but Kane still had an inch on him. Look for the match of Undertaker and Isaac Yankem on Youtube. Glen Jacobs isn't wearing any lifts there and he's still taller than the Undertaker.
KingNick said on 9/Aug/08
Undertaker himself saying he's 6'8":
This is from a magazine published by the WWE April 14, 2003. Undertaker talks out of character, as well as others talk to / about him out of character.
"I think that they forget that I'm SIX-FOOT-EIGHT and over 300 pounds." - UNDERTAKER, page 50
"... as this 6'8" Texas native began to fill out to around 280-290 pounds." JIM ROSS, page 4.
"- a 6-FOOT-8, 300 pound hybrid ..." page 1, anonymous.
Now I'll go as far to admit that this doesn't PROVE he's 6'8", but why would a guy who's billed 6'10" say he's 6'8" in a magazine published by the company he works for?
Here's an excerpt from WWE UNSCRIPTED, a book published by WWE in 2003:
"People said to me, 'You fill out a little bit at 6'8", you could go someplace.'" - UNDERTAKER, pg 39
Here's a few other excerpts regarding heights from UNSCRIPTED:
"I was 17 years old, 6'2" or 6'3", about 180 pounds." - EDGE, page 21
"So I told him, 'Vince, you got guys here that are 6'10", 7 feet; 300, 350 pounds. I'm 6'2", 250 pounds ... If you take my personality away from me, I can't compete with anyone here.'" - STEVE AUSTIN, page 41 (imagine being 6'2", 250 and feeling small)
"I'm 6'10"." - NATHAN JONES, page 61
"I'M SEVEN feet tall in my bare feet, and I weigh 453 pounds. My dad was 6'5", my mom was 5'10". The milkman was 6'10" ... draw your own conclusions." - BIG SHOW, page 73
There's probably a few more I'm missing, but this is all of them talking out of character.
Undertaker himself saying he's 6'8":
This is from a magazine published by the WWE April 14, 2003. Undertaker talks out of character, as well as others talk to / about him out of character.
"I think that they forget that I'm SIX-FOOT-EIGHT and over 300 pounds." - UNDERTAKER, page 50
"... as this 6'8" Texas native began to fill out to around 280-290 pounds." JIM ROSS, page 4.
"- a 6-FOOT-8, 300 pound hybrid ..." page 1, anonymous.
Now I'll go as far to admit that this doesn't PROVE he's 6'8", but why would a guy who's billed 6'10" say he's 6'8" in a magazine published by the company he works for?
Here's an excerpt from WWE UNSCRIPTED, a book published by WWE in 2003:
"People said to me, 'You fill out a little bit at 6'8", you could go someplace.'" - UNDERTAKER, pg 39
Here's a few other excerpts regarding heights from UNSCRIPTED:
"I was 17 years old, 6'2" or 6'3", about 180 pounds." - EDGE, page 21
"So I told him, 'Vince, you got guys here that are 6'10", 7 feet; 300, 350 pounds. I'm 6'2", 250 pounds ... If you take my personality away from me, I can't compete with anyone here.'" - STEVE AUSTIN, page 41 (imagine being 6'2", 250 and feeling small)
"I'm 6'10"." - NATHAN JONES, page 61
"I'M SEVEN feet tall in my bare feet, and I weigh 453 pounds. My dad was 6'5", my mom was 5'10". The milkman was 6'10" ... draw your own conclusions." - BIG SHOW, page 73
There's probably a few more I'm missing, but this is all of them talking out of character.
Alex said on 9/Aug/08
UT is 6'7 tops today. Kane is 6'7-6'7.5 minimum. I see Kane an inch taller than UT today. A peak UT would be pretty much the same height as Kane is.
UT is 6'7 tops today. Kane is 6'7-6'7.5 minimum. I see Kane an inch taller than UT today. A peak UT would be pretty much the same height as Kane is.
Red said on 9/Aug/08
Kevin, Derek... alot blind dudes arround here lately.
Look what I
Kevin, Derek... alot blind dudes arround here lately.
Look what I
Alex2 said on 9/Aug/08
Danimal says on 9/Aug/08
KIDDIES, Tha Undertaker has said in the past that he is 6'8". You WANT him to be taller than a height he has personally claimed for himself????
KIDDIES and NEWBIES alike, Taker was NOT his billed height back in the day and is NO LONGER the 6'8" he used to be.
Id love Taker to be measured today :)
Danimal says on 9/Aug/08
KIDDIES, Tha Undertaker has said in the past that he is 6'8". You WANT him to be taller than a height he has personally claimed for himself????
KIDDIES and NEWBIES alike, Taker was NOT his billed height back in the day and is NO LONGER the 6'8" he used to be.
Id love Taker to be measured today :)
NashOwnsAll said on 9/Aug/08
Undertaker is I believe between 6'7.75 - 6'8 in recent years, his height hasnt changed other than from the footwear he has at the time, and even so it only variates between 0.25 inch.
6'8 co-incides well with a 7'1 Khali, there is around a 4.5 - 5 inch gap between the 2 in that staredown they had for the first time.
Alot of people think Taker is 6.6.5 because of that staredown with Albert. There are dozens of staredowns undertaker has had with various wrestlers that he is atleast 6'7 but that all gets nullified by one single photo of him and Albert.
Instead of downgrading Undertaker, perhaps we should upgrade Albert, he's a huge man and even next to the big show he's not dwarfed like other so-called 6'6 wrestlers (Batista, Scott Hall, etc) were
Undertaker is I believe between 6'7.75 - 6'8 in recent years, his height hasnt changed other than from the footwear he has at the time, and even so it only variates between 0.25 inch.
6'8 co-incides well with a 7'1 Khali, there is around a 4.5 - 5 inch gap between the 2 in that staredown they had for the first time.
Alot of people think Taker is 6.6.5 because of that staredown with Albert. There are dozens of staredowns undertaker has had with various wrestlers that he is atleast 6'7 but that all gets nullified by one single photo of him and Albert.
Instead of downgrading Undertaker, perhaps we should upgrade Albert, he's a huge man and even next to the big show he's not dwarfed like other so-called 6'6 wrestlers (Batista, Scott Hall, etc) were
Ghost said on 9/Aug/08
Danimal,
Please explain the Taker and Khali staredowns.
If you say Taker is 6'6 than Khali becomes 6'10-11 and Big show becomes 6'9.
Danimal,
Please explain the Taker and Khali staredowns.
If you say Taker is 6'6 than Khali becomes 6'10-11 and Big show becomes 6'9.
Danimal said on 9/Aug/08
KIDDIES, Tha Undertaker has said in the past that he is 6'8". You WANT him to be taller than a height he has personally claimed for himself????
KIDDIES and NEWBIES alike, Taker was NOT his billed height back in the day and is NO LONGER the 6'8" he used to be.
KIDDIES, Tha Undertaker has said in the past that he is 6'8". You WANT him to be taller than a height he has personally claimed for himself????
KIDDIES and NEWBIES alike, Taker was NOT his billed height back in the day and is NO LONGER the 6'8" he used to be.
KingNick said on 8/Aug/08
Brain, Undertaker himself has said he's 6'8" in interviews. I posted the quotes at least ten times here. I'll do it another time but anyone else on here that reads my posts can vouch for me that he has said that and I've posted it.
Brain, Undertaker himself has said he's 6'8" in interviews. I posted the quotes at least ten times here. I'll do it another time but anyone else on here that reads my posts can vouch for me that he has said that and I've posted it.
Frank said on 8/Aug/08
They were both wearing Hugh cowboy boots with a Big heel so its hard to judge but i believe i would be alittle taller than them if they did not wear the boots
They were both wearing Hugh cowboy boots with a Big heel so its hard to judge but i believe i would be alittle taller than them if they did not wear the boots
Red said on 8/Aug/08
Frank, how tall were Macho Man and Bret when you met them?
Frank, how tall were Macho Man and Bret when you met them?
KingNick said on 8/Aug/08
Big Show, he wasn't billed as 6'8" in WCW, but 6'9" Click Here (listen at 1:55 - 2min mark)
He was billed 6'8" in the USWA Click Here (listen at the 24 sec mark)
And sorry I highly disagree I see a very clear footwear advantage for Albert in his match with UT.
KingNick says on 5/Aug/08
I just got a chance to check out the new UT/Albert photos. It is so obvious to me that Albert has a footwear advantage here Click Here he was getting pushed at the time they probably wanted to make him seem more monstrous.
Look at the toe and then the heel. It goes up into a lift. I think had UT had ever so slight of an advantage on Albert too, maybe 1/4" Click Here
I'm open to the fact that UT could be 6'7" now, it's certainly possible. Personally tho, I still think he's 6'8" and I put Albert at 6'6". In the match with shoes: Albert 6'8.5" and UT 6'8.75" Click Here again, I think they were trying to make Albert as tall as UT on purpose since he was getting a push at the time.
Big Show, he wasn't billed as 6'8" in WCW, but 6'9" Click Here (listen at 1:55 - 2min mark)
He was billed 6'8" in the USWA Click Here (listen at the 24 sec mark)
And sorry I highly disagree I see a very clear footwear advantage for Albert in his match with UT.
KingNick says on 5/Aug/08
I just got a chance to check out the new UT/Albert photos. It is so obvious to me that Albert has a footwear advantage here Click Here he was getting pushed at the time they probably wanted to make him seem more monstrous.
Look at the toe and then the heel. It goes up into a lift. I think had UT had ever so slight of an advantage on Albert too, maybe 1/4" Click Here
I'm open to the fact that UT could be 6'7" now, it's certainly possible. Personally tho, I still think he's 6'8" and I put Albert at 6'6". In the match with shoes: Albert 6'8.5" and UT 6'8.75" Click Here again, I think they were trying to make Albert as tall as UT on purpose since he was getting a push at the time.
Danimal said on 8/Aug/08
Big Show: the most interesting staredown that shows a POST 2000 height shrinkage for Taker is his FACE-OFF with Viscera in 1999, when Viscera wanted to become part of the ministry. Taker walked right up to him on solid ground outside of the ring (this was Takers PEAK height) and Taker had close to 2" on Viscera. So yeah, he could have been close to 6'8" PRE-2001 and post about 6'6.5". The man lost a solid inch at that point. Alex also noticed this. HE used to stack up pretty well next to Kane with HUGE boots in the late 90's. NO WAY would Taker only come in within 1" with KAne if Kane sported those huge late 90's boots. Taker may be as low as 6'6" today imo.
Big Show: the most interesting staredown that shows a POST 2000 height shrinkage for Taker is his FACE-OFF with Viscera in 1999, when Viscera wanted to become part of the ministry. Taker walked right up to him on solid ground outside of the ring (this was Takers PEAK height) and Taker had close to 2" on Viscera. So yeah, he could have been close to 6'8" PRE-2001 and post about 6'6.5". The man lost a solid inch at that point. Alex also noticed this. HE used to stack up pretty well next to Kane with HUGE boots in the late 90's. NO WAY would Taker only come in within 1" with KAne if Kane sported those huge late 90's boots. Taker may be as low as 6'6" today imo.
mike said on 8/Aug/08
well imo kevin nash has 3 inches on taker. so with that i,d have to say that taker these days is 6,7" max.
well imo kevin nash has 3 inches on taker. so with that i,d have to say that taker these days is 6,7" max.
Ghost said on 8/Aug/08
Big show,
Kane was also very close in height with 6'6,5 Big daddy V.
He had 1 inch on Taker when he wore lifts.
Big show,
Kane was also very close in height with 6'6,5 Big daddy V.
He had 1 inch on Taker when he wore lifts.
Alex2 said on 8/Aug/08
I have no problem seeing a full 6'8" maybe even a tad more peak for Undertaker, im with you Ola ;)
I have no problem seeing a full 6'8" maybe even a tad more peak for Undertaker, im with you Ola ;)
Big Show said on 8/Aug/08
Brain says on 7/Aug/08
How is taker taller than A-Train but only 6'6 1/2. How does a man going from being billed at 6'10 to 6'6 1/2. So he lost 4 inches?.. really? You know Ola, James Brown was really 6'5 but lost 2 inches now he is 6'3? oh yeah Michael Jackson is 6'3 maybe 6'4? I mean, Ola that is what you sound like
You obviously don't know the difference between someone's billed height and someone's real height. Taker was billed at 6'10 but he wasn't really 6'10, nor has he ever been 6'10. He was billed at 6'8 in WCW, so how can he be taller than that? Plus why are you picking on Ola, he's not claiming 6'6.5 for Undertaker, is he. He's actually agreeing with you.
A-Train was billed at 6'6 at University and he was still billed that height in 2006 when he wrestled for NJPW (he was listed in cm's so don't come up with he's 6'6.5 either). So one thing we can be sure off, Albert ain't taller than 6'6. Some people claim 2" lifts for Albert. In the match with Taker his boots were smaller than during his match with 6'8 Akebono and still Akebono measured up better to Albert, than Taker does, so how can taker be 6'8 as well. Akebono wore flat-soled boots, which probably gave him only a 0.5" height boost, which would make him 6'8.5 and still he had easily an inch on Albert. So Albert's boots couldn't give him more than 1.5" tops (unless he's shorter than 6'6). And in the match with Taker they probably gave him an inch tops, making him 6'7 in ring gear. Taker being half an inch taller, would therefore be 6'7.5 in ring gear.
The Undertaker/Albert staredown is one of the best staredown I've seen of Undertaker. We see a full-body, straight forward shot (so no camera advantage for either man) and then we see a close-up, where we can see their height difference better. I've yet to see a comparison like that between Taker and Khali. Khali had an easy 5 inches on Kane, and Kane always had an inch on Taker, so how can Taker be 4 inches shorter than Khali. Something doesn't add up.
Brain says on 7/Aug/08
How is taker taller than A-Train but only 6'6 1/2. How does a man going from being billed at 6'10 to 6'6 1/2. So he lost 4 inches?.. really? You know Ola, James Brown was really 6'5 but lost 2 inches now he is 6'3? oh yeah Michael Jackson is 6'3 maybe 6'4? I mean, Ola that is what you sound like
You obviously don't know the difference between someone's billed height and someone's real height. Taker was billed at 6'10 but he wasn't really 6'10, nor has he ever been 6'10. He was billed at 6'8 in WCW, so how can he be taller than that? Plus why are you picking on Ola, he's not claiming 6'6.5 for Undertaker, is he. He's actually agreeing with you.
A-Train was billed at 6'6 at University and he was still billed that height in 2006 when he wrestled for NJPW (he was listed in cm's so don't come up with he's 6'6.5 either). So one thing we can be sure off, Albert ain't taller than 6'6. Some people claim 2" lifts for Albert. In the match with Taker his boots were smaller than during his match with 6'8 Akebono and still Akebono measured up better to Albert, than Taker does, so how can taker be 6'8 as well. Akebono wore flat-soled boots, which probably gave him only a 0.5" height boost, which would make him 6'8.5 and still he had easily an inch on Albert. So Albert's boots couldn't give him more than 1.5" tops (unless he's shorter than 6'6). And in the match with Taker they probably gave him an inch tops, making him 6'7 in ring gear. Taker being half an inch taller, would therefore be 6'7.5 in ring gear.
The Undertaker/Albert staredown is one of the best staredown I've seen of Undertaker. We see a full-body, straight forward shot (so no camera advantage for either man) and then we see a close-up, where we can see their height difference better. I've yet to see a comparison like that between Taker and Khali. Khali had an easy 5 inches on Kane, and Kane always had an inch on Taker, so how can Taker be 4 inches shorter than Khali. Something doesn't add up.
KingNick said on 7/Aug/08
nice video tuga, I love their staredowns.
nice video tuga, I love their staredowns.
Red said on 7/Aug/08
adam, very good estimation. But I think Hogan was not 6
adam, very good estimation. But I think Hogan was not 6
Red said on 7/Aug/08
Anonymous was me
Anonymous was me
Anonymous said on 7/Aug/08
Da Man, bad Loser, even with size 16, 2 inches Lift are easy possible.
Da Man, bad Loser, even with size 16, 2 inches Lift are easy possible.
Frank said on 7/Aug/08
KingNick, Taker was friendly but he did not talk much Paul Bearer was a grouch
Macho Man and Brett Hart were not that Friendly Lex Luger was a nice guy and also Mart Jeanetty was cool
KingNick, Taker was friendly but he did not talk much Paul Bearer was a grouch
Macho Man and Brett Hart were not that Friendly Lex Luger was a nice guy and also Mart Jeanetty was cool
adam said on 7/Aug/08
Scott Hall was a legit 6-5 prime. Check out his match with Taker in youtube. He holds his own and looks just slightly shorter. About 2, max 3 inches.
Undertaker was a close 6-8 peak. I think Rob has it very well here. 6-7
Scott Hall was a legit 6-5 prime. Check out his match with Taker in youtube. He holds his own and looks just slightly shorter. About 2, max 3 inches.
Undertaker was a close 6-8 peak. I think Rob has it very well here. 6-7
Atoadaso said on 6/Aug/08
I see Undertaker at 3.5" over Goldberg. Both are standing with similar, average posture. Goldberg i'd say is 6'3" barefoot compared to guys like Brock Lesnar. Undertaker therefore looks about 6'6.5" barefoot in that photo.
It is possible the photo is tilted slightly in Goldberg's favour though, so Undertaker could look up to 6'7" when you take that into account. I don't see him being over 6'7" barefoot these days anyways so that seems about right.
I see Undertaker at 3.5" over Goldberg. Both are standing with similar, average posture. Goldberg i'd say is 6'3" barefoot compared to guys like Brock Lesnar. Undertaker therefore looks about 6'6.5" barefoot in that photo.
It is possible the photo is tilted slightly in Goldberg's favour though, so Undertaker could look up to 6'7" when you take that into account. I don't see him being over 6'7" barefoot these days anyways so that seems about right.
Clay said on 6/Aug/08
I actually agree with what this 'brain' guy is saying and not Danimal/Alex. If Undertaker is 6'6.5 these days how in the hell did appear 5 inches under Khali in 2006? The only way that is possible is if he had a 2 inch advantage in the shoes we all know Khali is about as legit a 7'1'' as it gets.
I actually agree with what this 'brain' guy is saying and not Danimal/Alex. If Undertaker is 6'6.5 these days how in the hell did appear 5 inches under Khali in 2006? The only way that is possible is if he had a 2 inch advantage in the shoes we all know Khali is about as legit a 7'1'' as it gets.
Clay said on 6/Aug/08
Batista is a strong 6'3'' and Undertaker never looks as low as 6'5'' next to him Miko. Always 4 or 5 inches taller.
Batista is a strong 6'3'' and Undertaker never looks as low as 6'5'' next to him Miko. Always 4 or 5 inches taller.
KingNick said on 6/Aug/08
hey Frank, I may have asked you this before, but I know you've met a lot of wrestlers. Who were some of your favs and who were the biggest? How were UT and Paul Bearer?
hey Frank, I may have asked you this before, but I know you've met a lot of wrestlers. Who were some of your favs and who were the biggest? How were UT and Paul Bearer?
tuga said on 6/Aug/08
JT says on 6/Aug/08
Click Here Can't see the footwear or stances though.
JT, I posted pics of that event from phenomforever.com, in the first one you can see taker
JT says on 6/Aug/08
Click Here Can't see the footwear or stances though.
JT, I posted pics of that event from phenomforever.com, in the first one you can see taker
Red said on 6/Aug/08
Da Man says on 5/Aug/08
Red says on 5/Aug/08
"Da Man, typing, typing and not viewing posted pics. Look at my pic down with Albert and Akebono and see what I
Da Man says on 5/Aug/08
Red says on 5/Aug/08
"Da Man, typing, typing and not viewing posted pics. Look at my pic down with Albert and Akebono and see what I
Drexyl said on 6/Aug/08
Goldberg's probably standing at 6,3" in shoes, and it looks like he is standing fairly straight (thought not completely) and Taker has a bit of a slouch. Even then I can still see about 4 inches between the two due to Taker's extremely long forehead. If he stood straight there he could easily look 6,8.5" next to Goldberg.
His build doesn't help matters either. He's noticeably slimmer than guys like Goldberg and Batista these days.
Goldberg's probably standing at 6,3" in shoes, and it looks like he is standing fairly straight (thought not completely) and Taker has a bit of a slouch. Even then I can still see about 4 inches between the two due to Taker's extremely long forehead. If he stood straight there he could easily look 6,8.5" next to Goldberg.
His build doesn't help matters either. He's noticeably slimmer than guys like Goldberg and Batista these days.
miko said on 6/Aug/08
Undertaker's height is weird to judge.
He can look as tall as 6"8-9 next to big guys like Kane.
But he can look as low as 6"5 next to others (Batista, Goldberg, Helms)
I would pin him at 6"6.75 or 6"7 flat, and 6"8.5 in ring gear.
Undertaker's height is weird to judge.
He can look as tall as 6"8-9 next to big guys like Kane.
But he can look as low as 6"5 next to others (Batista, Goldberg, Helms)
I would pin him at 6"6.75 or 6"7 flat, and 6"8.5 in ring gear.
Clay said on 5/Aug/08
Albert has to be at least close to 6'7''.
Albert has to be at least close to 6'7''.
KingNick said on 5/Aug/08
I just got a chance to check out the new UT/Albert photos. It is so obvious to me that Albert has a footwear advantage here Click Here he was getting pushed at the time they probably wanted to make him seem more monstrous.
I just got a chance to check out the new UT/Albert photos. It is so obvious to me that Albert has a footwear advantage here Click Here he was getting pushed at the time they probably wanted to make him seem more monstrous.
Da Man said on 5/Aug/08
Red says on 5/Aug/08
"Da Man, typing, typing and not viewing posted pics. Look at my pic down with Albert and Akebono and see what I
Red says on 5/Aug/08
"Da Man, typing, typing and not viewing posted pics. Look at my pic down with Albert and Akebono and see what I
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.