Scott Patterson's Height
6ft 0 (182.9 cm)
American actor, known for appearing on The Gilmore Girls. In a 2002 people article, it described him "6-ft., 205-lb".
Jason Ritter and Scott
Photos by PR Photos
Photos by PR Photos
Add a Comment15 comments
Average Guess (6 Votes)
6ft 0.29in (183.6cm)
6ft 0.29in (183.6cm)
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Jun/22
Slouching and still has 2in on Jason Ritter. Around 6ft is fair
Slouching and still has 2in on Jason Ritter. Around 6ft is fair
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 24/Jun/20
More like 6'0 and 195-lb in his prime.
More like 6'0 and 195-lb in his prime.
Joe said on 16/May/17
So he might be around 5'11" by now?
Editor Rob
So he might be around 5'11" by now?
Editor Rob no, I think if he's lost anything it's more like a fraction, not a noticeable 1/2 - 1 inch.
Joe said on 14/May/17
Rob, do you think he could have ever been 6'1"? Also, do you think he's lost any height by now, or do you think he's still 6'0"?
Editor Rob
Rob, do you think he could have ever been 6'1"? Also, do you think he's lost any height by now, or do you think he's still 6'0"?
Editor Rob not sure about 6ft 1, though you could argue he can pass for a big six footer...could he have lost a little height today? Very possible.
Yaspaa said on 2/Feb/16
6'0 in his prime. He's not 80, he's 55. Always wears a thick heel in GG.
6'0 in his prime. He's not 80, he's 55. Always wears a thick heel in GG.
dylan hulme said on 27/Aug/14
he has 2 inches on Donnie Wahlberg and Tobin Bell but he is only an inch taller than 5ft11 Costas Mandylor, so he's gotta be a 6 footer. But he is 55 years old so i think he was 6ft1 at his prime
he has 2 inches on Donnie Wahlberg and Tobin Bell but he is only an inch taller than 5ft11 Costas Mandylor, so he's gotta be a 6 footer. But he is 55 years old so i think he was 6ft1 at his prime
SAK said on 13/Oct/12
Looks taller
Looks taller
Yaspaa said on 4/Mar/09
He can't be 5'10 otherwise lauren Graham would not be 2-3 inches shorter in heels.
He can't be 5'10 otherwise lauren Graham would not be 2-3 inches shorter in heels.
DLady said on 2/Mar/09
He's my height, he is not a shade over 5'10". We were eye to eye last year.
He's my height, he is not a shade over 5'10". We were eye to eye last year.
Hugh said on 2/Mar/09
Can't see that picture Rob! Can you?
Can't see that picture Rob! Can you?
Yaspaa said on 12/May/08
He wore a thick heel in Gilmore girls but even so 6'0 is a good estimate.
He wore a thick heel in Gilmore girls but even so 6'0 is a good estimate.
Evelyn said on 5/Jul/06
Yeah, Lauren Graham is 5'9 and in one episode she is wearing at least a 3 inch heel and he is still taller than her. He has to be at least 6' or 6'1.
Yeah, Lauren Graham is 5'9 and in one episode she is wearing at least a 3 inch heel and he is still taller than her. He has to be at least 6' or 6'1.
andrew said on 23/May/06
He is further from the camera on the picture. Check him out on Gilmore Girls. He is 4 inches taller than Lauren Graham, who is 5'9". So I believe he is at least 6'1".
He is further from the camera on the picture. Check him out on Gilmore Girls. He is 4 inches taller than Lauren Graham, who is 5'9". So I believe he is at least 6'1".
Viper652 said on 19/May/06
I think hes around 5-10, since I peg Tom around 6-1.
I think hes around 5-10, since I peg Tom around 6-1.
D. Ray Morton said on 18/May/06
Looks 5'10"-5'11" in that pic.
He was a pro ballplayer, yes?
Looks 5'10"-5'11" in that pic.
He was a pro ballplayer, yes?
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.