How tall is Niall Matter

Jackie Lee said on 8/Jun/22
No way is this only a 2.5 inch difference... At least close to 4 inches maybe 3.5 inches.

ChristianPerkins said on 18/Mar/22
@Canson
Perhaps

Canson said on 29/Apr/20
@Christian: I’d say 5’11” unless there’s something with the camera that I’m not aware of

Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 26/Apr/20
@growtallerguru
Even if Rob's 5'8.5" (which he isn't), it still wouldn't make Niall 6'0". There's only around a 2.5" difference between the two, and he had a around 1/4" less footwear, so more like 2.75". I don't see him being much over 5'11" TBH. People here are deceived by his long hair.

Nik said on 5/Jun/19
5'11.5" is fine!

growtallerguru said on 19/Apr/19
If Rob had the footwear advantage in that photo, then Niall is definitely six feet tall. There is a staggering height difference between them in the above photo. I am also taking into account the undeniable fact that Rob is 5'8.5". If one disagrees just go to his youtube page where he measures himself barefoot many times and posts videos of the processes.

Bobby 178cm said on 3/Mar/19
With the footwear advantage, he still looks a solid 5'11 next to Rob. Easily 3 inches there, but take the advantage and It might be over 5'11.25, like 5'11 3/8s.

Miguel Calado said on 27/Jan/19
seems fine

Zampo said on 18/Oct/18
Looking at the photo again (and basing my estimate solely on this). Somewhere in the 181-181.5 cm range. Could be nearer 5'11.25 than 5'11.5.

Zampo said on 4/Sep/18
@MAD SAM,

I think whilst it's fine for a 5'11.5 person to round to six foot, whether they would look it or be called out on it, is another story. From my observations, I think once one hits 5'11.7 range at a low, the vast majority (if not all) will struggle to differentiate that person from 6'0.

On Niall, 5'11.5 is fair. I see him over 5'11.25.

MAD SAM said on 11/Aug/18
Rob can a person of this height claim himself as a 6 footer ?

Nik said on 6/Jun/18
Nearer the 5'11" flat mark is apt for Niall Matter!

Bobby said on 1/Feb/18
Strong 5'11 guy.

Oliver said on 6/Jan/18
Rob,since you have footwear advantage,doesn't he look taller with you than Matthew Lewis? I suppose Matthew is just 5ft 11.

World Citizen said on 29/May/17
Looks a flat 5 ft 11.

TJE said on 12/Jul/16
This guy looks as if Charlie Day went through second puberty lol

NBAer said on 24/Mar/16
181cm or 5'11.25(considering Rob's slight footwear advantage)

Crash said on 21/Sep/14
No, it really isn't, it's SLIM but not skinny. Big difference, you can easily be a fit and healthy, toned guy at that weight and height. David Beckham is similar height and weight, look at him.

And there's not a chance in hell that 160 at 5'9" is skinny unless you have a high amount of muscle mass.

I'd just say that your perception of healthy is distorted, which to be honest isn't surprising given that most are overweight these days in the west. Doesn't make it right though.

Clay said on 4/Sep/14
Emil says on 14/Jul/13
161 lbs isnt skinny for his height

Yeah it is...

Im 5'9'' and felt skinny at 160.

Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 31/Jul/13
A slight resemblance to fellow 182cm Joe Flanigan.
Rob, who looked taller, this guy or Joe?

Emil said on 19/Jul/13
MD says on 16/Jul/13
Emil,

Given what the average weight and height is in Canada, it is on the low end average, these days, and I say that as someone of nearly the same height, and even less weight.

It might be at the lower end but it isnt skinny. He looks like a lean and fit guy to me

Emil said on 14/Jul/13
161 lbs isnt skinny for his height

SAK said on 8/Jan/13
Looks a shade a under 6ft. So 182cm seems right for him.