John Stannard said on 1/Mar/18
another great dancer, I think she would pass for looking 5'10
littlesue said on 25/Sep/15
I've been going to the Strictly live tours for a few years, believe me these dancers are skinny in the flesh!! I suppose those skimpy dresses are not very forgiving though and any bit of meat would show up. Think she not the best looker of the dancers, reminds me of what Bruce Forsysths daughter would look like if she followed his features.
Arch Stanton said on 25/Sep/15
I think Natalie is just about OK with the physique, great body, but any more and I think she'd definitely be overdoing it and look less attractive.
Arch Stanton said on 25/Sep/15
@ Rob. Yes too fit. When a women overdoes the exercise and they start to resemble a distance athlete with Madonna arms and jutting out ribs. Very attractive though of course. I haven't seen how she fares with others and don't watch the show to really assess if she only looks 5 ft 9 or not. But in photographs given her build and look, yes, she can look 5 ft 10.
littlesue said on 24/Sep/15
Tallest of the Strictly dancers, shame as they always give her the tallest men who are usually old and crap!!
Nona said on 24/Sep/15
Nice height and complimented by nice curves and strong toned legs. However that rib cage jutting out is a big put off. Guess she weighs in at 130 lbs at her height
Arch Stanton said on 24/Sep/15
Rob, now this is a woman in looking at her who could pass for 5 ft 10.
Arch Stanton said on 24/Sep/15
Another tall Aussie. Fantastic body but probably too fit, she's got the arms of a distance athlete which is never good on a woman. I'm Sue Little Sue would agree on too skinny and fit!
Editor Rob
too fit?
I never thought she was 5ft 10, I think she is either 5ft 9 or 9.5.