How tall is Mila Kunis - Page 2

Add a Comment282 comments

Average Guess (136 Votes)
5ft 3.99in (162.5cm)
Alex said on 19/Apr/07
Bombay Rocker, I agree. Based on that mugshot she looks 5'5 or so in footwear but thats gotta be in heels or something or the camera angle, plus the Mugshots aint the best to go by. On the 70s show she always looks short and petite like you said. 5'3 is probably her height and no more. 5'2.5 she could be too.
Anonymous said on 28/Mar/07
I don't know, Mila easily looked more than an 1.5" taller than Elisha Cuthbert and Rachel Bilson. I think Mila either needs to be upgraded, or the two of them should be downgraded.
bikagyura said on 23/Mar/07
Rob (mugshot): She wish i Guess! :P
Anonymous said on 28/Feb/07
She had a solid couple inches on Jessica Simpson when she guest starred in an episode of That 70's Show
Anonymous said on 3/Jan/07
The mugshot is a promo shot, like she would be barefoot. I don't think she is more than 5'3". She is about 2.5" - 3" shorter than Kirsten and she is listed at 5'5.5" here - plus movie or show shots, they use shoes, boxes, angles to soften height differences.
Alex said on 27/Dec/06
Kirsten looks to have Mila by over 2 inches. 2.5 inches probably.
Alex said on 21/Dec/06
Mila wears big platforms sometimes in order to look closer in height t 5'10 Laura Prepon. The 5'3 for her is most likely right, she never really appears 5'4 or taller to me. But her at 5'3 puts Culkin at 5'5 most likely.
Alex said on 2/Dec/06
Rob, in that picture you have above, she makes Culkin look only 5'4.
Alex said on 19/Oct/06
Looks 5'3 to me on that 70's show but sometimes she wears huge platform shoes I read too on the show so watch out for those.
Anonymous said on 15/Oct/06
I read that on the 70's show, Mila wears platforms to make herself taller so that Laura Prepon doesn't look like she is towering over Mila because Laura is 6-7 inches taller then her. So, I think that 5'3.5 or 5'4" is about right.
ice said on 21/Sep/06
Okay, look at this pic of kirsten and mila: Click Here

Something has to give. Both girls are barefoot by the way. I didn't post the lower half, because I didn't know if it would be too much for the site.
Anonymous said on 28/Aug/06
Click Here

Not sure about her footwear, but she definitely seems taller than 5'3.5" here...
Anonymous said on 13/Aug/06
I was atching a re-run of "That 70's show" that had jessica Simpson guest starring.....isn't Simpson listed as 5"3? She looked a few inches shorter than Kunis. Which is really 5"3? Or was it maybe the shoes? They both had heels, so the difference shouldn't have been much.
ice said on 1/Aug/06
Hey Rob, this doesn't work. You have Mila at 5'3.5 and Dunst at 5'5.5" I saw more then 2 inches in that pic of them barefooted together, and barefoot pics are the best ones to go by.
EJ said on 21/Mar/06
I say about 5'4", still petite and what is cool is that she can look taller by wearing heels 2 to 3 inches high. She would look about 5'6" to 5'7". She is cute because she's cute, it has nothing to do with her height, and I doubt she'd want to be any shorter then she is.
ice said on 28/Jan/06
If you insist that Kunis is 5'3.5 or more, then Kirsten Dunst needs to be upgraded to 5'7 or more. That is the only way their listings would make sense.
D.D said on 17/Jan/06
oh yea Mila, if u can read this i am russian. Yukrain and Russian are basically the same. ïðèâåò, êàê äèëà? òè î÷èí êðàñèâàÿ. ÿ î÷èí õà÷ó áûòü ïîõîæà íà òåáå. hee hee!! anyways ur the best mila and very very pretty! oh yea and a lot of people say i look like u.
D.D said on 17/Jan/06
i think that famous girls like Rachel Bilson lies about her height. One time, i read that she was 5'4" at the very beginning on the computer. Later on, i read that she is 5'2". i think that Rachel Bilson lies about her height, because she wants to be taller when she really is 5'0". Mila Kunis probably also lied, because she probably wants to be shorter like some other famous actresses and singers. Celebrities just try really hard to hide something from them just so other people would like them even more.
Anonymous said on 11/Jan/06
rob can you explain why she looks tall on the photos?

Editor Rob
I think 5ft 4 is possible, but to see 5ft 7? Pics beside the other 70's show cast don't suggest it...some pics she can look taller yes
Josefin said on 8/Jan/06
Yes, i think that Mila Kunis is lying about her height.. she wants to appear short and cute but actually she is quite tall !!! But i cannot blame her.. Which girl wants to be tall???
Ice said on 7/Jan/06
Um... If kirsten dunst is listed at 5'6, how can Mila be 5'3.5? Editor?
Anonymous said on 5/Jan/06
Milla is atleast 5'7.She is tall like Macouly http://www.pure-zen.com/Gallery/displayimage.php?album=7&pos=74 http://www.pure-zen.com/Gallery/displayimage.php?album=7&pos=73 http://www.pure-zen.com/Gallery/displayimage.php?album=7&pos=143 http://www.pure-zen.com/Gallery/displayimage.php?album=7&pos=144 and here she is next to the 5'8 Vannessa Minnilo http://www.pure-zen.com/Gallery/displayimage.php?album=21&pos=18
Malin said on 28/Dec/05
How lucky mila musst be!! She is pretty and 5.ft 3.5in is a perfect height for a women! I wish my growth would had been stopped at 5'3"
=( Now iam 5'6" and i feel tall and dumb eventhough iam very pretty =/
Mila said on 29/Nov/05
Hey everybody!
I just want to say thakyou to ya'll! And as you have said allready, i am 5.ft 3.5in.
Thanks to my fans,everybody,thanks!

Love,Mila
Anonymous said on 16/Oct/05
It has been said that Mila Kunis is seven inches shorter than Laura Prepon, who is five feet ten inches. This would make Mila 5'3"
Anonymous said on 16/Oct/05
ice, that is a good point regarding the height difference between Kunis and Dunst. Mila is unquestionably noticably taller than Rachel Bilson, so I too have to wonder how little that girl really is. ALso, Mila is at least an inch or so taller than Elisha Cuthbert, so I'm cuious what her real height is as well.
ice said on 15/Oct/05
Question: There is a picture out there of Kirsten Dunst with Mila. Here, Kirsten is listed at 5'6. That would make Mila at most 5'2.5, and bilson at 5'0. What is up with there heights? Any ideas?
ice said on 14/Oct/05
i just did a scan on the web. EVERYWHERE she is listed at 5'3. That makes me wonder just how short Rachel Bilson is then?
tashiboshi said on 16/Sep/05
i think mila is 5'4.5" and i usually try to downgrade people! but i think she's taller.
Anonymous said on 16/Sep/05
I feel like Mila should either be boosted up, or Rachel Bilson should be lowered down....because the height difference between the two of them from those screencaps seems very noticable.
Anonymous said on 10/Aug/05
On That 70's Show, Mila Kunis was noticably taller than Rachel Bilson when she guest starred. I believe both were wearing heels (there are no feet shots, though), but what do you think? Here are some screencaps:
http://www.rachelbilsonfan.com/Visuals/albums/_TELEVISION/That70sShow/That70sShow%20%2821%29.jpg
http://www.rachelbilsonfan.com/Visuals/albums/_TELEVISION/That70sShow/That70sShow%20%2831%29.jpg
http://www.rachelbilsonfan.com/Visuals/albums/_TELEVISION/That70sShow/That70sShow%20%2832%29.jpg
What do you think?
Anonymous said on 8/Aug/05
In the photo where Mila and Elisha are standing face to face, it appears to me as if Mila is looking downward (opposed to Elisha, who is looking relatively straight on), giving the perception that she is shorter than she appears. If Mila's head was not at an inclination, I believe the height difference would be even more noticable.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.