Add a Comment2651 comments
Average Guess (831 Votes)
5ft 11.24in (180.9cm)
5ft 11.24in (180.9cm)
Jtm said on 26/Aug/17
I doubt blanchett is a full 5'8 let alone a strong 5'8. Look how short she looks with Tim Robbins in heels and also the picture az posted march/15. His footwear looks questionable in that picture. Obama isn't over 6'1 and DiCaprio is more than 2 inches shorter.
I doubt blanchett is a full 5'8 let alone a strong 5'8. Look how short she looks with Tim Robbins in heels and also the picture az posted march/15. His footwear looks questionable in that picture. Obama isn't over 6'1 and DiCaprio is more than 2 inches shorter.
Slim183 said on 22/Aug/17
How about 186 Obama 20s and 30s(1980s and 1990s) and 184.8 today?
How about 186 Obama 20s and 30s(1980s and 1990s) and 184.8 today?
Rising - 174 cm said on 22/Aug/17
I see 5'11"-5'11.25" with Cate, but I can't see Obama as high as 6'1.5", especially with Kobe and Jordan. He really didn't look much different than Trump. I don't think I saw the comment you're referring to on the Taylor Lautner page?
I see 5'11"-5'11.25" with Cate, but I can't see Obama as high as 6'1.5", especially with Kobe and Jordan. He really didn't look much different than Trump. I don't think I saw the comment you're referring to on the Taylor Lautner page?
MaskDeMasque said on 21/Aug/17
In the films i've seen him in, i've never seen him as a solid 5'11. I think 5'11 flat is spot on.
In the films i've seen him in, i've never seen him as a solid 5'11. I think 5'11 flat is spot on.
Slim183 said on 21/Aug/17
Rising - 174 cm, lol, I take it you saw my comment on the Taylor Lautner page.
Willies188, if ur 189 I'd recommend updating ur nickname, just browse in incognito mode or clear ur history.
Also keep in mind, Leo has a short broad face, aka low eye level and may be why he can look shorter, this is why I judge from the top of the head and not the eye level.
He does look 5'11.5 next to strong 5'8" listed Cate Blanchett. Also Obama was more of a 6'1.5 guy not sure how much he's lost due to stressful job.
Rising - 174 cm, lol, I take it you saw my comment on the Taylor Lautner page.
Willies188, if ur 189 I'd recommend updating ur nickname, just browse in incognito mode or clear ur history.
Also keep in mind, Leo has a short broad face, aka low eye level and may be why he can look shorter, this is why I judge from the top of the head and not the eye level.
He does look 5'11.5 next to strong 5'8" listed Cate Blanchett. Also Obama was more of a 6'1.5 guy not sure how much he's lost due to stressful job.
Slim183 said on 20/Aug/17
Id 5'11.5 him.
Id 5'11.5 him.
Rising - 174 cm said on 19/Aug/17
@Slim183: I'm just disagreeing that 5'11.5" was a better listing. I think this is closer since the more I look at Leo, the more he looks around the 5'11" mark to me. Btw, off topic, but seems you were 181 not long ago! Unfortunately, my height will only change in the other direction.
@Slim183: I'm just disagreeing that 5'11.5" was a better listing. I think this is closer since the more I look at Leo, the more he looks around the 5'11" mark to me. Btw, off topic, but seems you were 181 not long ago! Unfortunately, my height will only change in the other direction.
5'11.25 at noon. said on 18/Aug/17
Between 0.5 to 1 inch shorter than Chris tucker I'd say he's 5'11.25
Between 0.5 to 1 inch shorter than Chris tucker I'd say he's 5'11.25
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 18/Aug/17
HonestSlovene said on 9/Aug/17
IMHO:
Norton: 5'11.75"-6'0"
Hanks: 5'11.75" peak, 5'11.5" now
DiCaprio: 5'11.25"-5'11.5"
Pitt: 5'10.75" peak, 5'10.5" now
Clooney: 5'10.5" peak, 5'10" now
Damon: 5'9.5"
Edward Norton: 6'0", although he did look shy of it with Tom Hiddleston. To be fair, however, Tom was probably standing up straighter.
Tom Hanks: 6'0" in his peak, and 5'11 1/2" today. His posture can make him appear taller, just as his proportions often make him appear shorter. He did appear to be 6'1"-6'2" in Forrest Gump, however.
Leonardo Dicaprio: 5'11 1/2", and he really doesn't look any shorter than that.
Brad Pitt: 5'11"
George Clooney: 5'10 3/4", and maybe 5'10 1/2" today? He's shorter than Matthew McConaughey though.
Matt Damon: 5'9 3/4"-5'10" after seeing some more photos of him.
HonestSlovene said on 9/Aug/17
IMHO:
Norton: 5'11.75"-6'0"
Hanks: 5'11.75" peak, 5'11.5" now
DiCaprio: 5'11.25"-5'11.5"
Pitt: 5'10.75" peak, 5'10.5" now
Clooney: 5'10.5" peak, 5'10" now
Damon: 5'9.5"
Edward Norton: 6'0", although he did look shy of it with Tom Hiddleston. To be fair, however, Tom was probably standing up straighter.
Tom Hanks: 6'0" in his peak, and 5'11 1/2" today. His posture can make him appear taller, just as his proportions often make him appear shorter. He did appear to be 6'1"-6'2" in Forrest Gump, however.
Leonardo Dicaprio: 5'11 1/2", and he really doesn't look any shorter than that.
Brad Pitt: 5'11"
George Clooney: 5'10 3/4", and maybe 5'10 1/2" today? He's shorter than Matthew McConaughey though.
Matt Damon: 5'9 3/4"-5'10" after seeing some more photos of him.
Slim183 said on 18/Aug/17
Rising174, lmao if u think Leo is 5'11.5 max, why are you even arguing? It's just confusing.
I don't mean to start an argument.
Rising174, lmao if u think Leo is 5'11.5 max, why are you even arguing? It's just confusing.
I don't mean to start an argument.
JJ said on 17/Aug/17
Rob, how much does he look shorter than Chris Tucker by looking at this picture?
Click Here
Rob, how much does he look shorter than Chris Tucker by looking at this picture?
Click Here
MAD SAM said on 17/Aug/17
Cmon guys his height is equal to that of Kelly Rohrbach
He's nothing more than 5'10
Click Here:
Cmon guys his height is equal to that of Kelly Rohrbach
He's nothing more than 5'10
Click Here:
Rising - 174 cm said on 17/Aug/17
I disagree, Leo honestly looked more 5'10.5" with Spielberg and Ridley Scott. Tom Hanks had him looking maybe 5'11" flat during events for Catch Me If You Can if Hanks was still 6'0" himself. Obama had Leo looking more a weak 5'11" late last year as he had Leo by a solid 2". In the photo above, I'd say Leo looks more a solid 5'11", say 180.5 cm. I'm fine with 5'11"-5'11.25" range, but I think 5'11.5" would be a max for him.
I disagree, Leo honestly looked more 5'10.5" with Spielberg and Ridley Scott. Tom Hanks had him looking maybe 5'11" flat during events for Catch Me If You Can if Hanks was still 6'0" himself. Obama had Leo looking more a weak 5'11" late last year as he had Leo by a solid 2". In the photo above, I'd say Leo looks more a solid 5'11", say 180.5 cm. I'm fine with 5'11"-5'11.25" range, but I think 5'11.5" would be a max for him.
Slim183 said on 17/Aug/17
5'11.5 was a tad better listing though, but like the Arnold page, this will be endlessly debated as some see Leo as 5'11 flat, wether as some see Leo at 5'11.5
5'11.5 was a tad better listing though, but like the Arnold page, this will be endlessly debated as some see Leo as 5'11 flat, wether as some see Leo at 5'11.5
Rising - 174 cm said on 16/Aug/17
Leo can look both over and under 5'11" so this listing is fair.
@HonestSlovene: I'd guess for those guys
Norton: 5'11.75" peak and maybe down to 5'11.5" now
Hanks: 6'0" peak and closer to 5'11" these days, maybe 5'11.25". 5'11.75" peak is also possible of course.
DiCaprio: 5'11", maybe 5'11.25" as listed
Pitt: 5'10.5". I see no evidence he's lost anything, but 5'10.75" is about as likely.
Clooney: 5'10.5" peak, 5'10" current
Damon: 5'9.5"
So we're pretty close with our guesses.
Leo can look both over and under 5'11" so this listing is fair.
@HonestSlovene: I'd guess for those guys
Norton: 5'11.75" peak and maybe down to 5'11.5" now
Hanks: 6'0" peak and closer to 5'11" these days, maybe 5'11.25". 5'11.75" peak is also possible of course.
DiCaprio: 5'11", maybe 5'11.25" as listed
Pitt: 5'10.5". I see no evidence he's lost anything, but 5'10.75" is about as likely.
Clooney: 5'10.5" peak, 5'10" current
Damon: 5'9.5"
So we're pretty close with our guesses.
Junior said on 16/Aug/17
@Andy
He can't be only lost 1cm in a day. He should be 182cm morning out of bed, 180cm in evening/night.
@Andy
He can't be only lost 1cm in a day. He should be 182cm morning out of bed, 180cm in evening/night.
Slim183 said on 16/Aug/17
5'10.75 is harsh, I would argue 5'11 minimum. Leo would edge out guys like brad, Scott Eastwood, and fassbender for sure.
5'10.75 is harsh, I would argue 5'11 minimum. Leo would edge out guys like brad, Scott Eastwood, and fassbender for sure.
Andy said on 14/Aug/17
I have seen all his movies I grew up watching him turn into the big star he is now. I believe hes 181cm in the morning out of bed, 180cm in evening.
I have seen all his movies I grew up watching him turn into the big star he is now. I believe hes 181cm in the morning out of bed, 180cm in evening.
Original said on 13/Aug/17
180,5 at night.
180,5 at night.
Slim 182 cm said on 11/Aug/17
For starters, that guy doesn't even have a listing on here, he's probably nowhere near that mark, probably 6'2 range and finally we don't even know their shoes, so it doesn't really mean much.
For starters, that guy doesn't even have a listing on here, he's probably nowhere near that mark, probably 6'2 range and finally we don't even know their shoes, so it doesn't really mean much.
Wayne said on 10/Aug/17
Next to 6'4" french animator Denis Brogniart Click Here looks a legit 6' here
Next to 6'4" french animator Denis Brogniart Click Here looks a legit 6' here
Slim 182 cm said on 9/Aug/17
I doubt pitt has lost more than an eighth of an inch ATM.
A weak 5'11 would be great for pitt, it would explain why he looks a strong 5'10(178) with half an inch of footwear, and a weak (182)6' with 2 inches of footwear. Nortons slouch kinda makes him look shorter+ he did break his back a few years back, Wouldent surprise me if rob saw norton before his injury and gave him a 6'0.25 upgrade. But no more than 183.5 absolutely maximum.
But I wouldent judge nortons height from fight club as pitt wore boots, stood with millitary posture and may have had the camera angle advantage.
Click Here
All those guys are great actors btw, yes even Pitt and Clooney who they say are overrated for their looks and whatnot.
I doubt pitt has lost more than an eighth of an inch ATM.
A weak 5'11 would be great for pitt, it would explain why he looks a strong 5'10(178) with half an inch of footwear, and a weak (182)6' with 2 inches of footwear. Nortons slouch kinda makes him look shorter+ he did break his back a few years back, Wouldent surprise me if rob saw norton before his injury and gave him a 6'0.25 upgrade. But no more than 183.5 absolutely maximum.
But I wouldent judge nortons height from fight club as pitt wore boots, stood with millitary posture and may have had the camera angle advantage.
Click Here
All those guys are great actors btw, yes even Pitt and Clooney who they say are overrated for their looks and whatnot.
HonestSlovene said on 9/Aug/17
IMHO:
Norton: 5'11.75"-6'0"
Hanks: 5'11.75" peak, 5'11.5" now
DiCaprio: 5'11.25"-5'11.5"
Pitt: 5'10.75" peak, 5'10.5" now
Clooney: 5'10.5" peak, 5'10" now
Damon: 5'9.5"
IMHO:
Norton: 5'11.75"-6'0"
Hanks: 5'11.75" peak, 5'11.5" now
DiCaprio: 5'11.25"-5'11.5"
Pitt: 5'10.75" peak, 5'10.5" now
Clooney: 5'10.5" peak, 5'10" now
Damon: 5'9.5"
Slim 182 cm said on 7/Aug/17
Pretty confident Leo would edge out/hold his own against 75% of white men. From North America to Europe/South Africa and at Aus/nz. look at his barefoot pics, it's so clear There's a 181.61 possibility.
Pretty confident Leo would edge out/hold his own against 75% of white men. From North America to Europe/South Africa and at Aus/nz. look at his barefoot pics, it's so clear There's a 181.61 possibility.
Slim 182 cm said on 7/Aug/17
Lovely, I'd give the 181.61 upgrade, I actually think Leo claims his out of bed/morning/Bust a Gut height.
Brad: 5'10.75
Leo: 5'11.5
Lovely, I'd give the 181.61 upgrade, I actually think Leo claims his out of bed/morning/Bust a Gut height.
Brad: 5'10.75
Leo: 5'11.5
Dmeyer said on 7/Aug/17
rob do you agree leo is 181cm at night and not under if he is then at worst 5'11 1/8
Editor Rob
rob do you agree leo is 181cm at night and not under if he is then at worst 5'11 1/8
Editor Rob on a bad day he may well not measure much over 5ft 11, but I think he would generally manage to creep over 5ft 11 for most measurements, even at 10am he may well be 5ft 11.5 range.
HonestSlovene said on 5/Aug/17
I feel this listing is spot on for him, even 0.25 higher would be possible however I wouldn't go outside 5'11"-5'11.5"/ 180-181 cm because that is what he generally looks (upper average/tallish).
I feel this listing is spot on for him, even 0.25 higher would be possible however I wouldn't go outside 5'11"-5'11.5"/ 180-181 cm because that is what he generally looks (upper average/tallish).
Slim 182 cm said on 4/Aug/17
To be fair Leo wears sandals and actually walks barefoot at the beach and when he played with his water guns... wether as brad pitt never goes barefoot or wears sandals, he's always wearing shoes or boots, brad looked 177 next to Tarantino in one photo then 183 in another... if brad was really in the 5'11 range, he'd inflate it to 6', being Obsessed With Height he is so 179 is a goer for him, and Leo is taller compared to Clooney, McConaughey and Crowe. So saying Leo is 179 is just as ridiculous as his 183 claim. 181 is fine for Leo.
Overall when you compare Leo and Brad to Cate Blanchett and Jonah Hill, there's no doubt Leo is stronger and longer than Brad...
To be fair Leo wears sandals and actually walks barefoot at the beach and when he played with his water guns... wether as brad pitt never goes barefoot or wears sandals, he's always wearing shoes or boots, brad looked 177 next to Tarantino in one photo then 183 in another... if brad was really in the 5'11 range, he'd inflate it to 6', being Obsessed With Height he is so 179 is a goer for him, and Leo is taller compared to Clooney, McConaughey and Crowe. So saying Leo is 179 is just as ridiculous as his 183 claim. 181 is fine for Leo.
Overall when you compare Leo and Brad to Cate Blanchett and Jonah Hill, there's no doubt Leo is stronger and longer than Brad...
teehona said on 3/Aug/17
5'10 without shoes, 5'11 with shoes.
5'10 without shoes, 5'11 with shoes.
justbringit said on 3/Aug/17
Rob how likely is between 5'11.25" and 5'11.5" range?
Editor Rob
Rob how likely is between 5'11.25" and 5'11.5" range?
Editor Rob at night I can't see it, but I did for a good while think anywhere in that range was very possible and he's ended up on the 11.25 as it seems overall a good fit.
Richardspain said on 3/Aug/17
Obama 185cm nowadays. 186 in peak.
DiCaprio 180cm in the morning and 179 in the afternoon.
Brad Pitt is 179cm too.
I'm six footer barefoot (183cm) in the morning and the people who is 185cm/186cm is only a bit taller than me and sometimes i am not unlike or distinct than they.
And if you see Leo and Obama next to is crearly that Leo isn't a solid 6 footer he is less than that. They are differents!!
So Leo maybe is range 179-180 not more.
182 MAXwith footwear
I am 6 feet in the morning and 6'1 with boots or shoes but i say to friends/people etc.. i am 182 cm!!
He claims 6 foot hahaha Don't lie brother!
Obama 185cm nowadays. 186 in peak.
DiCaprio 180cm in the morning and 179 in the afternoon.
Brad Pitt is 179cm too.
I'm six footer barefoot (183cm) in the morning and the people who is 185cm/186cm is only a bit taller than me and sometimes i am not unlike or distinct than they.
And if you see Leo and Obama next to is crearly that Leo isn't a solid 6 footer he is less than that. They are differents!!
So Leo maybe is range 179-180 not more.
182 MAXwith footwear
I am 6 feet in the morning and 6'1 with boots or shoes but i say to friends/people etc.. i am 182 cm!!
He claims 6 foot hahaha Don't lie brother!
Johnny said on 2/Aug/17
@Rob is 5ft 11 flat possible?
With 6ft 0.5 Kyle Chandler Click Here
With Jon Bernthal(wwhom you have met) Click Here Click Here Click Here
Editor Rob
@Rob is 5ft 11 flat possible?
With 6ft 0.5 Kyle Chandler Click Here
With Jon Bernthal(wwhom you have met) Click Here Click Here Click Here
Editor Rob I wouldn't go to 5ft 11 flat, although at times he might look it...I feel he could stretch up over it for a 181cm reading.
Slim 182 cm said on 29/Jul/17
Even if I wanted dicaprio to be 182+, it's impossible. This is probably his highest available listing. He might measure 5 mms more if he's lucky.
Even if I wanted dicaprio to be 182+, it's impossible. This is probably his highest available listing. He might measure 5 mms more if he's lucky.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Jul/17
183.2cm out of bed
183.2cm out of bed
Animus said on 25/Jul/17
Rob, so when you list DiCaprio at 5'11¼", does that mean in your listing system that he would be 5'11" right before bed? Or would he hit 5'11" at an extreme low when his back is hurting etc?
Editor Rob
Rob, so when you list DiCaprio at 5'11¼", does that mean in your listing system that he would be 5'11" right before bed? Or would he hit 5'11" at an extreme low when his back is hurting etc?
Editor Rob I still think he is a little over 5ft 11 in afternoon range.
Guest66 said on 24/Jul/17
Daniel, are you trying to say that he has lost some height? At his age ? He maybe doesn't look as lanky as he did 20 years ago, but he hasn't lost any height.
Daniel, are you trying to say that he has lost some height? At his age ? He maybe doesn't look as lanky as he did 20 years ago, but he hasn't lost any height.
Danieltiger said on 21/Jul/17
178-179 cm skinny guy looking taller in his 20's strong 5'10 in the pass today strong 5'9. Compared him next to Mario Lopez please . Look at him at the Oscars today is in the 5'9 range. biggest lol ever if they say he is 5'11
178-179 cm skinny guy looking taller in his 20's strong 5'10 in the pass today strong 5'9. Compared him next to Mario Lopez please . Look at him at the Oscars today is in the 5'9 range. biggest lol ever if they say he is 5'11
Danieltiger said on 21/Jul/17
Am I the only one here that thinks he was 5'10 and today string 5'9? 5'11 and over = lol
Am I the only one here that thinks he was 5'10 and today string 5'9? 5'11 and over = lol
even said on 20/Jul/17
5 foot 11 inches at a minimum .
5 foot 11 inches at a minimum .
Slim 182 cm said on 17/Jul/17
Richardspain, it's reasonable as DiCaprio wore boots in blood diamond, yet was edged out by djimon hounso who was wearing flip flops or was barefoot, and in "the beach" when barefoot he didn't exactly look above 181 next to Tilda swinton who's like 179 range.
Richardspain, it's reasonable as DiCaprio wore boots in blood diamond, yet was edged out by djimon hounso who was wearing flip flops or was barefoot, and in "the beach" when barefoot he didn't exactly look above 181 next to Tilda swinton who's like 179 range.
Richardspain said on 17/Jul/17
Only difference between Brad- DiCaprio is that Brad is 179cm if he is very tired.
Leonardo usually is 180cm. He claimed 6 feet it is funny!!! Neither footwear is 6 feet this guy. DiCaprio with footwear will be 181 max and luck!
Brad and DiCaprio have very similar height. They aren't more than 180cm or 5'11 they are a bit taller than Clooney and Dammon ( 177/178cm)
Only difference between Brad- DiCaprio is that Brad is 179cm if he is very tired.
Leonardo usually is 180cm. He claimed 6 feet it is funny!!! Neither footwear is 6 feet this guy. DiCaprio with footwear will be 181 max and luck!
Brad and DiCaprio have very similar height. They aren't more than 180cm or 5'11 they are a bit taller than Clooney and Dammon ( 177/178cm)
Slim 181 cm said on 16/Jul/17
Hijopotamus, I meant to say: brad as 5'11.5(182) out of bed and 6 foot Leo out of bed.
But 180 brad evening and Leo 182 evening. whoopie Doo.
Hijopotamus, I meant to say: brad as 5'11.5(182) out of bed and 6 foot Leo out of bed.
But 180 brad evening and Leo 182 evening. whoopie Doo.
Slim 181 cm said on 15/Jul/17
Leo and Vin need to switch listings asap. Seriously I don't see the guy below 180 ever. Did I forget to mention I've watched 14 of his movies?
Leo and Vin need to switch listings asap. Seriously I don't see the guy below 180 ever. Did I forget to mention I've watched 14 of his movies?
Hijopotamus said on 15/Jul/17
Slim, you are incredible looool
In here you rank pitt as a 183 guy?
So with regular shoes he reaches the 6ft mark?
So with the tricky shoes and lifts he wears he must be 6'2, right?
You are too funny
Brad is 5'10 max and Leo 181 cm
Slim, you are incredible looool
In here you rank pitt as a 183 guy?
So with regular shoes he reaches the 6ft mark?
So with the tricky shoes and lifts he wears he must be 6'2, right?
You are too funny
Brad is 5'10 max and Leo 181 cm
Agreco4l said on 14/Jul/17
5'11" range, not quite 6 feet.
5'11" range, not quite 6 feet.
Slim 181 cm said on 8/Jul/17
Flat 5'11 at worst, 5'11.5 at best.
Flat 5'11 at worst, 5'11.5 at best.
Slim 181.5 cm said on 6/Jul/17
Zenit99, we can't even see their footwear!
Zenit99, we can't even see their footwear!
even said on 5/Jul/17
solid 181 cm
solid 181 cm
Slim 181 cm said on 5/Jul/17
RichardSpain, technically 5"11.25 is 180.975
😜
So have you changed your mind now?
RichardSpain, technically 5"11.25 is 180.975
😜
So have you changed your mind now?
RichardSpain said on 29/Jun/17
I don't believe he is a solid 181 cm. To me he seems 180cm max during the day.
I don't believe he is a solid 181 cm. To me he seems 180cm max during the day.
Slim 181 cm said on 26/Jun/17
Anything less than a strong 5'11 is a joke.
5'11.25 - 5'11.5
Anything less than a strong 5'11 is a joke.
5'11.25 - 5'11.5
Zenit99 said on 24/Jun/17
Leo looks tiny next to 188 cm Elon Musk. The guy cannot be more than 178 cm. Click Here
Here is Musk next to Obama: Click Here
Leo looks tiny next to 188 cm Elon Musk. The guy cannot be more than 178 cm. Click Here
Here is Musk next to Obama: Click Here
Slim 181 cm said on 21/Jun/17
Rampage- being 5'11.5 is WAY better than being 5'9.5.
Rampage- being 5'11.5 is WAY better than being 5'9.5.
Ted said on 21/Jun/17
No more than 5' 11'5''.
No more than 5' 11'5''.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Jun/17
In all honesty though, there's nothing impressive about him height-wise.
In all honesty though, there's nothing impressive about him height-wise.
Slim 181 cm said on 19/Jun/17
Rob, please compare Leo's and brad's eye level, to my mind they're the same:
Click Here
My opinion still stands from my last post.
Rob, please compare Leo's and brad's eye level, to my mind they're the same:
Click Here
My opinion still stands from my last post.
Amy said on 18/Jun/17
People will make this guy out to be a solid 6 foot he is over 5"11 comfortably and a bit taller than some of the other 181cm guys out their but I don't buy 183cm+ he is 5"11.5 tops but can easily look that mark at times. My guess is 181cm as listed.
People will make this guy out to be a solid 6 foot he is over 5"11 comfortably and a bit taller than some of the other 181cm guys out their but I don't buy 183cm+ he is 5"11.5 tops but can easily look that mark at times. My guess is 181cm as listed.
Lorne??? said on 17/Jun/17
Billy Costigan, nice screen/user name :)
Billy Costigan, nice screen/user name :)
Gregorovich said on 14/Jun/17
I have never met him, but in all these photos, he looks close to 6 foot but has suspicious footwear. 5'11" max for me.
I have never met him, but in all these photos, he looks close to 6 foot but has suspicious footwear. 5'11" max for me.
justbringit said on 14/Jun/17
I'm pretty convinced that he is 5'11"5 or at least a strong 181cm,he seems to edge out nolan by a very small fraction even tho they seem close and generally looks taller than other 181cm guys like gylenhaal and radnor
I'm pretty convinced that he is 5'11"5 or at least a strong 181cm,he seems to edge out nolan by a very small fraction even tho they seem close and generally looks taller than other 181cm guys like gylenhaal and radnor
Slim 181 cm said on 13/Jun/17
Rampage, Leo's morning height could be 182. I'd say 6 cm between him and djimom hounso.
Rampage, Leo's morning height could be 182. I'd say 6 cm between him and djimom hounso.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Jun/17
Johnny, he was wearing boots while Dimijon was in sandels and there was 1in between them. Really I thought he looked a strong 6ft. Obviously he's nowhere near that barefoot.
Johnny, he was wearing boots while Dimijon was in sandels and there was 1in between them. Really I thought he looked a strong 6ft. Obviously he's nowhere near that barefoot.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Jun/17
Johnny, he was wearing boots while Dimijon was in sandels and there was 1in between them.
Johnny, he was wearing boots while Dimijon was in sandels and there was 1in between them.
Slim 181 cm said on 8/Jun/17
Leonardo: 181.5 cm.
Brad: 179.5 cm.
Leonardo: 181.5 cm.
Brad: 179.5 cm.
Billy Costigan said on 5/Jun/17
Hey Rob, besides 5ft 11.5, did you have him listed as anything else before this?
Also, in my humble opinion, 5ft 11.5 was the best fit for Leo. He always looks somewhere between 180 and 183.
Hey Rob, besides 5ft 11.5, did you have him listed as anything else before this?
Also, in my humble opinion, 5ft 11.5 was the best fit for Leo. He always looks somewhere between 180 and 183.
Morningheight 181.5cm said on 4/Jun/17
I'd say he's in my height range.
I'd say he's in my height range.
Animus said on 3/Jun/17
He is roughly two inches shorter than Barack Obama. Therefore, he must be closer to 5ft11 than 6ft. He could be slightly above 181cm, but he's probably not 5ft11½ (Tom Hanks was clearly taller back in the Catch Me If You Can-days and he wasn't taller than 6ft.)
If I recall correctly, he looked taller in Blood Diamond because he wore boots. And the rumor has it that used a small lift in The Aviator in order to better approach the stature of Howard Hughes.
He is roughly two inches shorter than Barack Obama. Therefore, he must be closer to 5ft11 than 6ft. He could be slightly above 181cm, but he's probably not 5ft11½ (Tom Hanks was clearly taller back in the Catch Me If You Can-days and he wasn't taller than 6ft.)
If I recall correctly, he looked taller in Blood Diamond because he wore boots. And the rumor has it that used a small lift in The Aviator in order to better approach the stature of Howard Hughes.
Johnny said on 2/Jun/17
@Rampage did he look 6ft next to Djimon Honsou? I don't think so.
@Rampage did he look 6ft next to Djimon Honsou? I don't think so.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Jun/17
I thought overall 5ft11½ was the best fit. He's gone from looking 5ft11 flat in Titanic and The Beach to a decent 6ft in Blood Diamond and The Aviator...
I thought overall 5ft11½ was the best fit. He's gone from looking 5ft11 flat in Titanic and The Beach to a decent 6ft in Blood Diamond and The Aviator...
Anon said on 1/Jun/17
Leo was listed as 5'11.5 for a long time Rob, why the downgrade? Do you still think he looks 5'11.5 in some pictures but less than that in most? ..I can't imagine he's started losing any height yet at the age of 42. I think people tend to start losing height only in their late 40's or early 50's. Though in special circumstances Bodybuilders like Arnold Schwarzenneger for example I believe was already down to 6'1 flat by the time he appeared in Terminator 2 at the age of (43 during filming not 42).
Editor Rob
Leo was listed as 5'11.5 for a long time Rob, why the downgrade? Do you still think he looks 5'11.5 in some pictures but less than that in most? ..I can't imagine he's started losing any height yet at the age of 42. I think people tend to start losing height only in their late 40's or early 50's. Though in special circumstances Bodybuilders like Arnold Schwarzenneger for example I believe was already down to 6'1 flat by the time he appeared in Terminator 2 at the age of (43 during filming not 42).
Editor Rob overall I think over 5ft 11 is still a best estimate, but maybe 11.5 seemed just a little bit much, though you could still make a case for it.
RichardSpain said on 29/May/17
I see only a solid 180cm. I don't believe that Dicaprio be 181 cm or more. 180 cm to him and I am very generous.
I see only a solid 180cm. I don't believe that Dicaprio be 181 cm or more. 180 cm to him and I am very generous.
James B said on 22/May/17
Would easily edge out brad pitt
Would easily edge out brad pitt
Hijopotamus said on 21/May/17
A real 5'11" ish man. Leo can wear flip flops or walk with no shoes no problem. He doesnt go to the beach with tricky boots like Brad Pitt.
A real 5'11" ish man. Leo can wear flip flops or walk with no shoes no problem. He doesnt go to the beach with tricky boots like Brad Pitt.
James B said on 18/May/17
A strong 5'11 with classics movie star looks so fair to say he must content with his life.
Always been a fan of him as an actor and next to Tom hanks one of the greatest actors to grace Hollywood.
A strong 5'11 with classics movie star looks so fair to say he must content with his life.
Always been a fan of him as an actor and next to Tom hanks one of the greatest actors to grace Hollywood.
RisingForce said on 17/May/17
I really can't see anything below a solid 5'10" for Crowe, and 179 seems likely. I think he claims his height in shoes, so he'd be 5'10.25" at worst and never drops below 5'10". Leo did look shorter than 182 cm Christian Bale did with Crowe, though so somewhere around 5'11" seems right.
I really can't see anything below a solid 5'10" for Crowe, and 179 seems likely. I think he claims his height in shoes, so he'd be 5'10.25" at worst and never drops below 5'10". Leo did look shorter than 182 cm Christian Bale did with Crowe, though so somewhere around 5'11" seems right.
berta said on 14/May/17
to mw hw is withwr 181 ore 182. 180 is to short and 183 is to tall. i think the average guess may be a little low
to mw hw is withwr 181 ore 182. 180 is to short and 183 is to tall. i think the average guess may be a little low
Original said on 13/May/17
@Leo2001 Yeah that's true in TITANIC he looked solid 5'11 there. 180-181.
@Leo2001 Yeah that's true in TITANIC he looked solid 5'11 there. 180-181.
Namor said on 12/May/17
Not saying he is but is it possible that he's 182 cm? Be pretty cool if he was lol his mum is really small yet he's way taller than her he's her clone in appearance
Not saying he is but is it possible that he's 182 cm? Be pretty cool if he was lol his mum is really small yet he's way taller than her he's her clone in appearance
Mike said on 11/May/17
Leo's one of those guys you always think is shorter until you see him out in the open. It's like he has a short guy's head and face on a tall guy's body.
Leo's one of those guys you always think is shorter until you see him out in the open. It's like he has a short guy's head and face on a tall guy's body.
BT said on 8/May/17
@Leo2001: I think he's always looked like a typical 5'11 guy, the 5'11.25 mark is arguable but the 5'11.5 always seemed generous imo.
@Leo2001: I think he's always looked like a typical 5'11 guy, the 5'11.25 mark is arguable but the 5'11.5 always seemed generous imo.
Spencer said on 7/May/17
181 tops . He looks a flat 5'11 to me
181 tops . He looks a flat 5'11 to me
Leo2001 said on 6/May/17
@RisingForce
Good pictures with Spilberg
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Leo looks a flat 5ft 11.
@RisingForce
Good pictures with Spilberg
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Leo looks a flat 5ft 11.
jtm said on 6/May/17
I would bet russell crowe is really 177 cm. That supports the 5'10 for DiCaprio.
I would bet russell crowe is really 177 cm. That supports the 5'10 for DiCaprio.
RisingForce said on 5/May/17
Ralph Macchio did seem to grow an inch in his mid 20s, but he looked and sounded even younger than Leo. I'm a bit skeptical Leo grew at all, especially seeing him clearly shorter than Tom Hanks, who was likely 182 cm at the time, but he can give a taller impression than he use to. After Glenn told Leo he looked taller than he expected or something like that, Leo remarked "it's the period shoes." I don't know what that means, though. I don't think he wears elevators, but maybe he meant shoes he was wearing to film a period film? If you look at Leo with 5'7.5" Ridley Scott on Ridley's page, Leo can look 5'10" range, just like he did with Spielberg. I certainly think he's taller than that as anyone can look shorter or taller than they are, but it suggests to me Leo is simply a solid 5'11". There was a 1999 Time Magazine feature called "A Visit with Leonardo DiCaprio" that described him as 5'11". It makes sense that he was slightly taller than 5'10.5" Russell Crowe. Maybe Leo was still giving his height as 5'11" at that time and now gives it as 6 feet?
Ralph Macchio did seem to grow an inch in his mid 20s, but he looked and sounded even younger than Leo. I'm a bit skeptical Leo grew at all, especially seeing him clearly shorter than Tom Hanks, who was likely 182 cm at the time, but he can give a taller impression than he use to. After Glenn told Leo he looked taller than he expected or something like that, Leo remarked "it's the period shoes." I don't know what that means, though. I don't think he wears elevators, but maybe he meant shoes he was wearing to film a period film? If you look at Leo with 5'7.5" Ridley Scott on Ridley's page, Leo can look 5'10" range, just like he did with Spielberg. I certainly think he's taller than that as anyone can look shorter or taller than they are, but it suggests to me Leo is simply a solid 5'11". There was a 1999 Time Magazine feature called "A Visit with Leonardo DiCaprio" that described him as 5'11". It makes sense that he was slightly taller than 5'10.5" Russell Crowe. Maybe Leo was still giving his height as 5'11" at that time and now gives it as 6 feet?
Leo2001 said on 4/May/17
@berta titanic was filmed in 96...Leo was born in late 74,he as like 21-22.
I think he was not grow after.
With Billy Zane(lsited 6ft0.5)in 97.
He looks like 5ft 11-.5 like now.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
@berta titanic was filmed in 96...Leo was born in late 74,he as like 21-22.
I think he was not grow after.
With Billy Zane(lsited 6ft0.5)in 97.
He looks like 5ft 11-.5 like now.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
berta said on 4/May/17
did he grow anything after titanic? he was like 23 years old back then but looked like 16 in titaninc i would have guessed 180 cm. in recent years i think either 181 ore 182
did he grow anything after titanic? he was like 23 years old back then but looked like 16 in titaninc i would have guessed 180 cm. in recent years i think either 181 ore 182
justbringit said on 24/Apr/17
this would be the lowest i would argue for tbh,i also doubt i would go as far as 5'11.75" but i definately think that 5'11.5" is a real possibility.What do you think rob?
this would be the lowest i would argue for tbh,i also doubt i would go as far as 5'11.75" but i definately think that 5'11.5" is a real possibility.What do you think rob?
shiva 181 cms said on 18/Apr/17
@ rising force I'd agree that he's 182 at most
@ rising force I'd agree that he's 182 at most
shiva 181 cms said on 18/Apr/17
He looked almost an inch shorter than Tom thanks whose 6' roughly, and also usually looks 5'11-11.5 , 5'11.25 seems spot on
He looked almost an inch shorter than Tom thanks whose 6' roughly, and also usually looks 5'11-11.5 , 5'11.25 seems spot on
Animus said on 15/Apr/17
He is definitely closer to 5'11" than 6'; that much is clear from seeing him in "The Wolf of Wall Street". 5'11.25" is a good listing, because he can occasionally look like a weak six-footer.
He is definitely closer to 5'11" than 6'; that much is clear from seeing him in "The Wolf of Wall Street". 5'11.25" is a good listing, because he can occasionally look like a weak six-footer.
RisingForce said on 8/Apr/17
Hanks shoes seem completely normal. Since when has Hanks been known to wear lifts at premieres? If anything, Leo is a more likely lift candidate than Hanks. 181 cm isn't a bad listing for Leo and 5'11.5" is possible, but the most he could be.
Hanks shoes seem completely normal. Since when has Hanks been known to wear lifts at premieres? If anything, Leo is a more likely lift candidate than Hanks. 181 cm isn't a bad listing for Leo and 5'11.5" is possible, but the most he could be.
HonestSlovene said on 7/Apr/17
@Johnson Obama 185 cm, Di Caprio 181 cm is more realistic IMHO. Nearly all of your posts are upgrades of the current listed heights on this site (not sure why is that).
@Johnson Obama 185 cm, Di Caprio 181 cm is more realistic IMHO. Nearly all of your posts are upgrades of the current listed heights on this site (not sure why is that).
trumpslave said on 7/Apr/17
Hanks had lift advantage in that premiere just look at the shoes.
Leo clearly is 5ft11.5 or 182 cm and Obama is 186 cm or maybe even 187 cm in his youth
Hanks had lift advantage in that premiere just look at the shoes.
Leo clearly is 5ft11.5 or 182 cm and Obama is 186 cm or maybe even 187 cm in his youth
Johnny said on 5/Apr/17
In the "The Revenant" premiere photos Leo looks closer to 5ft 11 flat with Poulter, Gleeson and Hardy. He does not look 5ft 11.5 there. In that event they were standing on flat ground with similar footwear.
In the "The Revenant" premiere photos Leo looks closer to 5ft 11 flat with Poulter, Gleeson and Hardy. He does not look 5ft 11.5 there. In that event they were standing on flat ground with similar footwear.
Johnson said on 5/Apr/17
Obama 186 Di Caprio 182.5... no less than that
Obama 186 Di Caprio 182.5... no less than that
S.J.H said on 5/Apr/17
Click Here Obama look 6cm taller than Leo. Leo is 5'10.5 max and possible just 5'10 and Obama look nothing over 6'0.5 with 6'4.75 kobe bryant
Click Here Obama look 6cm taller than Leo. Leo is 5'10.5 max and possible just 5'10 and Obama look nothing over 6'0.5 with 6'4.75 kobe bryant
RisingForce said on 3/Apr/17
He's more 180 cm, 5'11" flat. Look at the full shot below with Tom Hanks at the Catch Me If You Can photocall. Hanks was 183 cm max, possibly 182 cm, but about an inch taller, as shown again here, despite Leo being closer and Hanks' stance wider: Click Here And here he looks no more than 3" taller than 5'7.5" Spielberg: Click Here He also looked at least 2" shorter than 6'1" Obama in the recent video and struggled to even look the full 5'11" with 5'9.5" Damon and 5'8.5" Jack Nicholson. He does look a solid 6 feet in shoes though if Cate Blanchett is 5'10.75" in those heels. Looked pretty much exactly 2" taller than 5'9" Tom Hardy: Click Here Leo at 5'11" is taller than Pitt because Pitt is more 179 cm or 5'10.5" barefoot and looks at least an inch taller than that at 182, even 183 cm because of his extra heels and perfect posture.
He's more 180 cm, 5'11" flat. Look at the full shot below with Tom Hanks at the Catch Me If You Can photocall. Hanks was 183 cm max, possibly 182 cm, but about an inch taller, as shown again here, despite Leo being closer and Hanks' stance wider: Click Here And here he looks no more than 3" taller than 5'7.5" Spielberg: Click Here He also looked at least 2" shorter than 6'1" Obama in the recent video and struggled to even look the full 5'11" with 5'9.5" Damon and 5'8.5" Jack Nicholson. He does look a solid 6 feet in shoes though if Cate Blanchett is 5'10.75" in those heels. Looked pretty much exactly 2" taller than 5'9" Tom Hardy: Click Here Leo at 5'11" is taller than Pitt because Pitt is more 179 cm or 5'10.5" barefoot and looks at least an inch taller than that at 182, even 183 cm because of his extra heels and perfect posture.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Apr/17
He can really look across that 181-183cm zone
He can really look across that 181-183cm zone
Heylo said on 1/Apr/17
Like some said earlier, he looks upper average consistently in movies, sometimes even tall and that is only possible if you're around his listed height. A 5'10 guy would look average almost all the time, a 5'9 guy would look average but kind of shortish at times and a 5'8 guy is lower average but can quite often be perceived as short while At 5'7, you are definitely short in movies almost all the time and not many people will question it.
Like some said earlier, he looks upper average consistently in movies, sometimes even tall and that is only possible if you're around his listed height. A 5'10 guy would look average almost all the time, a 5'9 guy would look average but kind of shortish at times and a 5'8 guy is lower average but can quite often be perceived as short while At 5'7, you are definitely short in movies almost all the time and not many people will question it.
CS said on 1/Apr/17
@Johnny I weigh about 70 kg last I checked.
@Johnny I weigh about 70 kg last I checked.
King of the hill 91 said on 1/Apr/17
181 cm or 182cm weake
181 cm or 182cm weake
HonestSlovene said on 1/Apr/17
In majority white European countries roughly 177-178 cm is considered average, so Leo at 180-181 cm is average/tall, meaning average height that can look tall at times.
In majority white European countries roughly 177-178 cm is considered average, so Leo at 180-181 cm is average/tall, meaning average height that can look tall at times.
Nik said on 1/Apr/17
He's at the very gateway of being tall and noticeably above average.
He's at the very gateway of being tall and noticeably above average.
crazypeoplethesedays... said on 1/Apr/17
1.81 here. Feel nothing more than an avarage height. + for !!whaat
1.81 here. Feel nothing more than an avarage height. + for !!whaat
Johnny said on 1/Apr/17
@CS How much do you weigh? I am around 85 kg(187 lbs).
@CS How much do you weigh? I am around 85 kg(187 lbs).
Keith said on 30/Mar/17
6 foot 183cm
6 foot 183cm
CS said on 30/Mar/17
@Johnny same here. It's because once you hit the 180 cm mark you are definitely above average and people will see you as taller than the average guy even if it's not a huge difference the way something over 6 feet would be but it's still enough of a difference.
@Johnny same here. It's because once you hit the 180 cm mark you are definitely above average and people will see you as taller than the average guy even if it's not a huge difference the way something over 6 feet would be but it's still enough of a difference.
Nik said on 29/Mar/17
I am short by about 1.75 inches though!
I am short by about 1.75 inches though!
Johnny said on 29/Mar/17
I am the same height as Leo, many people call me tall. 5ft 11 range is not a very tall height for a man but I have to admit I feel above average.
I am the same height as Leo, many people call me tall. 5ft 11 range is not a very tall height for a man but I have to admit I feel above average.
Nik said on 28/Mar/17
@Johnson
👍
Nobody has ever seen me as short and I am 5'7.25" - 5'7.5"! Although if pushed yes I am short as opposed to being tall or bang on average.
@Johnson
👍
Nobody has ever seen me as short and I am 5'7.25" - 5'7.5"! Although if pushed yes I am short as opposed to being tall or bang on average.
Original said on 27/Mar/17
OK Hes 5'11.
OK Hes 5'11.
Johnson said on 27/Mar/17
I am 5'9 and I feel solid average. I became Obsessed With Height because people tend to think 5'9 as shortish but nobody has ever saw me shortish...
I am 5'9 and I feel solid average. I became Obsessed With Height because people tend to think 5'9 as shortish but nobody has ever saw me shortish...
HonestSlovene said on 27/Mar/17
@Whaaat Then you aren't 180 cm, plain and simple.
@Whaaat Then you aren't 180 cm, plain and simple.
Whaaat said on 26/Mar/17
I'm 1.80 and I feel low average in modern world and Short compared to teens. With my boots 3 cm I'm 1.84 and only at 1.84 I'm starting to feel solid. 1.82 isn't solid. Look these teens now. 6'2 and 6'3 everywhere.
I'm 1.80 and I feel low average in modern world and Short compared to teens. With my boots 3 cm I'm 1.84 and only at 1.84 I'm starting to feel solid. 1.82 isn't solid. Look these teens now. 6'2 and 6'3 everywhere.
CS said on 26/Mar/17
I know a guy who I believe is right around Leo's height (181 cm, 5'11.5 max) and he claims 6'1 lol. He's kind of a funny case though as sometimes he wears bigger than average footwear but he often hunches his shoulders so he can sometimes appear a bit shorter (talking about the guy I know).
I know a guy who I believe is right around Leo's height (181 cm, 5'11.5 max) and he claims 6'1 lol. He's kind of a funny case though as sometimes he wears bigger than average footwear but he often hunches his shoulders so he can sometimes appear a bit shorter (talking about the guy I know).
Johnson said on 25/Mar/17
I see here solid 5'10 as tall in the street. People around me say "that tall guy" about someone who is 178
I see here solid 5'10 as tall in the street. People around me say "that tall guy" about someone who is 178
Johan said on 25/Mar/17
"Tallish" applies to men who can look tall without actually being tall. It perfectly sums up the strong 5'11" range.
"Tallish" applies to men who can look tall without actually being tall. It perfectly sums up the strong 5'11" range.
Sam said on 24/Mar/17
Never bought the 6'1 estimates for Leo but 6'0 is believable on film, would measurer nearer 5'11 in person. And, I don't see what's wrong with using the term tallish, which is simply another word for above average. Leo looks above average but he's not the classic definition of tall. He's in the grey area. Tall starts nearer 6'0, there and past that is the threshold and the more you are over the 6'0 mark the more you can comfortably claim be to be tall.
Never bought the 6'1 estimates for Leo but 6'0 is believable on film, would measurer nearer 5'11 in person. And, I don't see what's wrong with using the term tallish, which is simply another word for above average. Leo looks above average but he's not the classic definition of tall. He's in the grey area. Tall starts nearer 6'0, there and past that is the threshold and the more you are over the 6'0 mark the more you can comfortably claim be to be tall.
Chris said on 23/Mar/17
More chance of the 6" than gyllenhall. I think 5"11.5 is fair. Kate wins let surprisingly called him 6"1
More chance of the 6" than gyllenhall. I think 5"11.5 is fair. Kate wins let surprisingly called him 6"1
jason said on 23/Mar/17
whaat so your saying that solid is 183 and 182 isn't solid? that's only 1 cm difference. solid in north america starts at 5-11 because at this height you are taller than 70% of men.
whaat so your saying that solid is 183 and 182 isn't solid? that's only 1 cm difference. solid in north america starts at 5-11 because at this height you are taller than 70% of men.
James said on 22/Mar/17
@Whaaat Wrong 1.83 is tall, above average is a synonym with tall, I mean tall is "above average" by definition. 1.78-1.80 is not short but average I don't know why do you create that story that anything below 1.81 is short for a man.
@Peter175 Leo doesn't look tall at all, Leo is barely 5' 11" flat, an average height.
@jason The term "tallish" doesn't exist, try to find it on a dictionary. Only celebheights geeks use that term. It's so ridicoulous like saying "shortish". Most people only classify others as "short", "average" or "tall". 5' 11" flat is considered "average" not tall.
@Whaaat Wrong 1.83 is tall, above average is a synonym with tall, I mean tall is "above average" by definition. 1.78-1.80 is not short but average I don't know why do you create that story that anything below 1.81 is short for a man.
@Peter175 Leo doesn't look tall at all, Leo is barely 5' 11" flat, an average height.
@jason The term "tallish" doesn't exist, try to find it on a dictionary. Only celebheights geeks use that term. It's so ridicoulous like saying "shortish". Most people only classify others as "short", "average" or "tall". 5' 11" flat is considered "average" not tall.
Whaaat said on 21/Mar/17
Whatever u say guys. Above average and solid height starts at 1.83. Tall 1.87. Anything below 1.81 is short for a MAN. Think about it
Whatever u say guys. Above average and solid height starts at 1.83. Tall 1.87. Anything below 1.81 is short for a MAN. Think about it
Peter175 said on 21/Mar/17
He looks tall honestly. I would have guess 183 at least
He looks tall honestly. I would have guess 183 at least
jason said on 20/Mar/17
whaat your dumb. 180 is tallish in western clountries and tall in asia. at 180 you will never be labeled short and will sometimes be called tall depending where you are
whaat your dumb. 180 is tallish in western clountries and tall in asia. at 180 you will never be labeled short and will sometimes be called tall depending where you are
S.J.H said on 19/Mar/17
Lol. If 180cm is short therefore 90% of the world men is legitmate shorty. From a real 5'11 onwards is tall in all europe countries and 5'10 is tall in asia. Leo is just under 181cm and over 177cm he is average in america and consider tall, maybe..
Lol. If 180cm is short therefore 90% of the world men is legitmate shorty. From a real 5'11 onwards is tall in all europe countries and 5'10 is tall in asia. Leo is just under 181cm and over 177cm he is average in america and consider tall, maybe..
Whaaat said on 18/Mar/17
Anything below 1.80 is short for men. I mean really even 1.80 itself is short. In modern world. Im 1.80 myself. Anything solid starts from 1.83. Tall is from 1.87 and above
Anything below 1.80 is short for men. I mean really even 1.80 itself is short. In modern world. Im 1.80 myself. Anything solid starts from 1.83. Tall is from 1.87 and above
RisingForce said on 12/Mar/17
Leo gains the ground advantage at one point, but he looks a solid 2 inches shorter than Obama in the video: Click Here I'd say 180 cm, probably a flat 5'11", but it wouldn't surprise me if he fell just short and sometimes used slightly thicker footwear
Leo gains the ground advantage at one point, but he looks a solid 2 inches shorter than Obama in the video: Click Here I'd say 180 cm, probably a flat 5'11", but it wouldn't surprise me if he fell just short and sometimes used slightly thicker footwear
6'1.5 said on 10/Mar/17
@Peter rob has jonah at 5'6.25" so now I highly doubt Leonardo is this current listing. Hell it might even be just over his morning height. But I'm gonna be generous and say he's 5'10.75"
@Peter rob has jonah at 5'6.25" so now I highly doubt Leonardo is this current listing. Hell it might even be just over his morning height. But I'm gonna be generous and say he's 5'10.75"
S.J.H said on 6/Mar/17
If leo came out one day say he is only 5'10 he lie all the time being 6'0 and some people will still believe he is 5'11-6'0
If leo came out one day say he is only 5'10 he lie all the time being 6'0 and some people will still believe he is 5'11-6'0
Guest66 said on 3/Mar/17
It is true, he does give a upper average height impression in most of his movies, and he looks tallish compared to most of his actor coworkers as well. It's a trait of someone who is actually close to 6 feet in my opinion.
It is true, he does give a upper average height impression in most of his movies, and he looks tallish compared to most of his actor coworkers as well. It's a trait of someone who is actually close to 6 feet in my opinion.
andre said on 1/Mar/17
Rob why in the titanic movie he looked like a 5ft7 5ft8 guy ?
he was shorter then most actors
why he looked like 5ft8?
Rob why in the titanic movie he looked like a 5ft7 5ft8 guy ?
he was shorter then most actors
why he looked like 5ft8?
6 foot 17 yrs still growing said on 21/Feb/17
Is it me or dicaprio eye level is way lower than average? .. he looks nearer 5 ft 11 than 6 most of the time 5 ft 11.25 is a good figure for him overall
Is it me or dicaprio eye level is way lower than average? .. he looks nearer 5 ft 11 than 6 most of the time 5 ft 11.25 is a good figure for him overall
6'1.5 said on 19/Feb/17
I cant see him taller than 5'11" next to 6'0.5" bradley cooper
I cant see him taller than 5'11" next to 6'0.5" bradley cooper
CS said on 18/Feb/17
Very good point Brandon. If this guy was average range that wouldn't happen. I've noticed that too, admittedly moreso after I started frequenting this website but it's definitely an important observation in my opinion.
Very good point Brandon. If this guy was average range that wouldn't happen. I've noticed that too, admittedly moreso after I started frequenting this website but it's definitely an important observation in my opinion.
Brandon said on 18/Feb/17
He always has a strong height presence in his films....not super tall by any means, but he always stacks up very well and usually on the taller side to his cast mates. Could be that he works with a lot of shorter actors, but he always looks solid. On the upper edge of average.
He always has a strong height presence in his films....not super tall by any means, but he always stacks up very well and usually on the taller side to his cast mates. Could be that he works with a lot of shorter actors, but he always looks solid. On the upper edge of average.
Peter said on 17/Feb/17
Here is DiCaprio with 5'5 Jonah Hill. Click Here
He looks 4 inches max taller than him which would put Leonardo at 5'9 which probably is his real height. Pretty average height guy to be honest.
Here is DiCaprio with 5'5 Jonah Hill. Click Here
He looks 4 inches max taller than him which would put Leonardo at 5'9 which probably is his real height. Pretty average height guy to be honest.
Pat said on 16/Feb/17
5'9 at the absolute most
5'9 at the absolute most
S.J.H said on 16/Feb/17
@Sammy
Haha maybe true. The journalist wouldn't have prank the world that leo is only 5'10 but i'm going with 5'11 not more may account him in footwear
@Sammy
Haha maybe true. The journalist wouldn't have prank the world that leo is only 5'10 but i'm going with 5'11 not more may account him in footwear
Sammy said on 12/Feb/17
You all are crazy, this man is no more than 5'10....
You all are crazy, this man is no more than 5'10....
King of the hill 91 said on 12/Feb/17
A strong 180cm Nothing less what do you think rob
A strong 180cm Nothing less what do you think rob
Arthur said on 6/Feb/17
@Peter
No way Hanks wasn't 183 cm at his peak. The difference looks more like an inch than 3 cm. Leo looks 5'11-5'11.25 in that photo, certainly not ''180 cm max''
@Peter
No way Hanks wasn't 183 cm at his peak. The difference looks more like an inch than 3 cm. Leo looks 5'11-5'11.25 in that photo, certainly not ''180 cm max''
Anonymous said on 5/Feb/17
He looks about 6 ft to me,I think he is at least 5'11.5"
He looks about 6 ft to me,I think he is at least 5'11.5"
Peter 179cm said on 5/Feb/17
@ Guest66 Hanks looks 3cm taller in that pic,both have equal postures although Hanks shoes look thicker...Still that would put Leo at 180cm max since there's always the possibility Hanks was "only" 182 in his peak.
@ Guest66 Hanks looks 3cm taller in that pic,both have equal postures although Hanks shoes look thicker...Still that would put Leo at 180cm max since there's always the possibility Hanks was "only" 182 in his peak.
Danny said on 3/Feb/17
Every single shot next to 6' tall actors (and models) cleary shows Di Caprio is shorter than that. It makes me laugh when when every now and then someone claims he is 6' - yeah, maybe in shoes.;)
Every single shot next to 6' tall actors (and models) cleary shows Di Caprio is shorter than that. It makes me laugh when when every now and then someone claims he is 6' - yeah, maybe in shoes.;)
jams said on 2/Feb/17
he is 6ft, no more no less.
he is 6ft, no more no less.
Johnny said on 2/Feb/17
@Rob please add Django Unchained at the top....he was amazing in that movie!
@Rob please add Django Unchained at the top....he was amazing in that movie!
Guest66 said on 31/Jan/17
Click Here I find this to be an interesting shot, Rob how tall Leo looks here in your opinion?
Editor Rob
Click Here I find this to be an interesting shot, Rob how tall Leo looks here in your opinion?
Editor Rob at that time, Hanks could still look near 6ft.
HonestSlovene said on 29/Jan/17
Yeah he is a typical solid 5'11 range guy. Both 6'0" and 5'10" estimates are off.
Yeah he is a typical solid 5'11 range guy. Both 6'0" and 5'10" estimates are off.
fabrizio said on 29/Jan/17
rob what do you thinks of leonardo di caprio?shorter of 6ft tall tom hanks in catch if you can and 6ft1 obama i think he is strong 5'11' you agree with me?
rob what do you thinks of leonardo di caprio?shorter of 6ft tall tom hanks in catch if you can and 6ft1 obama i think he is strong 5'11' you agree with me?
CS said on 28/Jan/17
I guess I can see why some people think of him as shorter at times. I even know of some people who have seen films of his and thought he was around 5'10.
But when you actually look at eye level, which has proven to be highly trustworthy, there's no way this guy is anything under 180 cm.
I guess I can see why some people think of him as shorter at times. I even know of some people who have seen films of his and thought he was around 5'10.
But when you actually look at eye level, which has proven to be highly trustworthy, there's no way this guy is anything under 180 cm.
Sandy Cowell said on 27/Jan/17
@ Johnny - Hi! I've taken heed of what you've just said, so I will take in Leo's height compared to Tom Hardy's next time I see 'The Revenant'. I have many other films to see, including 'The Wolf of Wall Street', and I can do some checking out and comparing along the way! Cheers! 🍻
@ Johnny - Hi! I've taken heed of what you've just said, so I will take in Leo's height compared to Tom Hardy's next time I see 'The Revenant'. I have many other films to see, including 'The Wolf of Wall Street', and I can do some checking out and comparing along the way! Cheers! 🍻
Johnny said on 26/Jan/17
@Sandy Cowell these people are just trolls....look at Leo next to Tom Hardy whom Rob has seen from a distance and thinks he is at least 5'9" Leo always looks a couple of inches taller than him......so he must be minimum 5'11" range....
@Sandy Cowell these people are just trolls....look at Leo next to Tom Hardy whom Rob has seen from a distance and thinks he is at least 5'9" Leo always looks a couple of inches taller than him......so he must be minimum 5'11" range....
Sandy Cowell said on 25/Jan/17
I arrived at this page completely open-minded as to Leo's height. If I'd had to hazard a guess, then I would have gone for 5ft11, but having read a few comments, including one from Gerald written a couple of days ago, it has made me revise my thoughts! There is no greater evidence than getting a report from someone who has met the person in question, and as Gerald has met him, my guess is going to go down accordingly.
I saw him on the Ellen De Generes show in the earlier half of last year, and it was on that show that I decided he is definitely not a 6 footer.
I will go for the lower height possibility that was in my head when I came to this page, and that is 5ft10.
My favourite performances of his are the roles he played in 1) 'Django Unchained' and
2) 'The Revenant'.
In the first film, we saw him play a nasty piece of work, evil to the core, lacking in any human compassion and with the most terrible, violent temper. Never had I seen him play someone like that before, and his performance was very convincing - great stuff! Then of course, he was fantastic in 'The Revenant', the actual plot of which was much better than I expected! It was riveting from start to finish and the scenery was breathtaking! It was this film he was discussing with Ellen, who'd seen it and was raving about it, and rightly so! If I'm honest, when I first got hold of my copy, I searched straightaway for the bear attack, but there is so much more going on, including a villainous, callous character that Leo has to face, played by Tom Hardy.
I think Mr DiCaprio has really excelled himself of late, so who cares if he's a bit shorter than expected?
I arrived at this page completely open-minded as to Leo's height. If I'd had to hazard a guess, then I would have gone for 5ft11, but having read a few comments, including one from Gerald written a couple of days ago, it has made me revise my thoughts! There is no greater evidence than getting a report from someone who has met the person in question, and as Gerald has met him, my guess is going to go down accordingly.
I saw him on the Ellen De Generes show in the earlier half of last year, and it was on that show that I decided he is definitely not a 6 footer.
I will go for the lower height possibility that was in my head when I came to this page, and that is 5ft10.
My favourite performances of his are the roles he played in 1) 'Django Unchained' and
2) 'The Revenant'.
In the first film, we saw him play a nasty piece of work, evil to the core, lacking in any human compassion and with the most terrible, violent temper. Never had I seen him play someone like that before, and his performance was very convincing - great stuff! Then of course, he was fantastic in 'The Revenant', the actual plot of which was much better than I expected! It was riveting from start to finish and the scenery was breathtaking! It was this film he was discussing with Ellen, who'd seen it and was raving about it, and rightly so! If I'm honest, when I first got hold of my copy, I searched straightaway for the bear attack, but there is so much more going on, including a villainous, callous character that Leo has to face, played by Tom Hardy.
I think Mr DiCaprio has really excelled himself of late, so who cares if he's a bit shorter than expected?
Harold said on 25/Jan/17
He is maybe 5'11 with shoes on
He is maybe 5'11 with shoes on
BT said on 25/Jan/17
5'11 flat is a good mark for him, he can look a tad under or over it.
5'11 flat is a good mark for him, he can look a tad under or over it.
roan said on 24/Jan/17
I agree with 5'9....he is not a tall guy whatsoever
I agree with 5'9....he is not a tall guy whatsoever
Gerald said on 23/Jan/17
5'11? Yeah right! I have met Leonardo DiCaprio...He is barely 5'10...I am 5'10.5 and he was shorter than me! Look at him barefoot in the scene when he is fighting with Margot Robbie in Wolf of Wall Street, he is like 4 inches taller than her and she is like 5'5...
5'11? Yeah right! I have met Leonardo DiCaprio...He is barely 5'10...I am 5'10.5 and he was shorter than me! Look at him barefoot in the scene when he is fighting with Margot Robbie in Wolf of Wall Street, he is like 4 inches taller than her and she is like 5'5...
berta said on 23/Jan/17
to me leo is 181 and pushing 182.
to me leo is 181 and pushing 182.
Johnny said on 23/Jan/17
@Rob how tall does he look next to Obama here? Click Here
Editor Rob
@Rob how tall does he look next to Obama here? Click Here
Editor Rob in that still he can seem a weak 5ft 11.
Johno said on 22/Jan/17
Yeh well he certainly has height on Mr Cunningham that is for sure but with the comparison with Leo and Jenny, i reckon there is less than 2-inches between Leo and Jenny.
Yeh well he certainly has height on Mr Cunningham that is for sure but with the comparison with Leo and Jenny, i reckon there is less than 2-inches between Leo and Jenny.
James said on 21/Jan/17
I recently watched "The Man in the Iron Mask" and I soon realized 1.81 is too high for Leo.
Nick Diaz and Nate Diaz are both of them fighters and oficially listed as 6 ft. Well, Dicaprio doesn't look over 5' 11" next to them.
This pic refute the 1.81 listing IMO:
Click Here
I recently watched "The Man in the Iron Mask" and I soon realized 1.81 is too high for Leo.
Nick Diaz and Nate Diaz are both of them fighters and oficially listed as 6 ft. Well, Dicaprio doesn't look over 5' 11" next to them.
This pic refute the 1.81 listing IMO:
Click Here
Peter 179cm said on 20/Jan/17
5'10.75-5'11 range is more likely,he's a good example of a solid 180cm guy.Although i wouldn't be surprised if he's 179 at night since he has looked sub-5'10 in some pics with bad/relaxed posture.He's probably 181-182 out of bed though,that's the only reason i would argue 5'11.25 for him-a morning range!...
5'10.75-5'11 range is more likely,he's a good example of a solid 180cm guy.Although i wouldn't be surprised if he's 179 at night since he has looked sub-5'10 in some pics with bad/relaxed posture.He's probably 181-182 out of bed though,that's the only reason i would argue 5'11.25 for him-a morning range!...
Martin said on 19/Jan/17
The man is no more than 5'9.5. Please people, stop embarrassing yourself.
Editor Rob
The man is no more than 5'9.5. Please people, stop embarrassing yourself.
Editor Rob Martin, simply look at Leo with the Height Troll G, who is likely in Portman Elevator Boots.
Giorgi said on 16/Jan/17
Rob, what would you think his out-of-bed/before-bed heights are?
Editor Rob
Rob, what would you think his out-of-bed/before-bed heights are?
Editor Rob 6ft to a solid 5ft 11 range, I currently would still go with that.
Guest66 said on 12/Jan/17
Gauntlet, Honestly I don't see any significant difference when he is suited or wearing normal footwear on these shots with Hill, to me he still manages to look at least 5'11" flat on them. On the other hand he looked noticeably shorter than those 5'11.5"-6'0" mma fighters.
Gauntlet, Honestly I don't see any significant difference when he is suited or wearing normal footwear on these shots with Hill, to me he still manages to look at least 5'11" flat on them. On the other hand he looked noticeably shorter than those 5'11.5"-6'0" mma fighters.
Rory said on 11/Jan/17
Rob,
When standing tall, what do you think is the most someone could argue for Leo ?
Editor Rob
Rob,
When standing tall, what do you think is the most someone could argue for Leo ?
Editor Rob Rory, I feel you can still make a case for Leo looking 5ft 11.5 to people.
Joel said on 11/Jan/17
Rob how Tall do you think Leo is in the Wolf of Wall street?
Rob how Tall do you think Leo is in the Wolf of Wall street?
Johnny said on 11/Jan/17
I think the lowest that can be argued for Leo is 5'11" range....If anyone looks at The Revenant premiere photos...he kinda looks 5'11" flat compared to 6'1" Domhnall Gleeson and 6'2" Will Poulter...
I think the lowest that can be argued for Leo is 5'11" range....If anyone looks at The Revenant premiere photos...he kinda looks 5'11" flat compared to 6'1" Domhnall Gleeson and 6'2" Will Poulter...
Gauntlet said on 10/Jan/17
Guest66, I think the pattern in those pictures is that he doesn't wear costume shoes with lifts. Here is other pics:
With 5'10 Gisele Bundchen and she looks to be bare foot, not Dicpario tho.
Click Here
With 5'6,25 Jonah Hill (Suitpic)
Click Here
Compared to
Jonah Hill again, but without those lifts
Click Here
Guest66, I think the pattern in those pictures is that he doesn't wear costume shoes with lifts. Here is other pics:
With 5'10 Gisele Bundchen and she looks to be bare foot, not Dicpario tho.
Click Here
With 5'6,25 Jonah Hill (Suitpic)
Click Here
Compared to
Jonah Hill again, but without those lifts
Click Here
berta said on 10/Jan/17
he had pretty mutch on tom hardy height wise. no shorter than this
he had pretty mutch on tom hardy height wise. no shorter than this
Guest66 said on 9/Jan/17
Gauntlet, those are interesting shots indeed, he is looking sub 5'11" on each of them, coincidence?
Gauntlet, those are interesting shots indeed, he is looking sub 5'11" on each of them, coincidence?
Johno said on 8/Jan/17
Yeh Gaunlet, with them MMA fighters he does look around the ballmark you state.
Yeh Gaunlet, with them MMA fighters he does look around the ballmark you state.
King of the hill 91 said on 8/Jan/17
177cm tom hardy 182cm he wont have lost yet he looks a weake 182cm maybe flat rob
177cm tom hardy 182cm he wont have lost yet he looks a weake 182cm maybe flat rob
Gauntlet said on 7/Jan/17
His height is obvious in these pictures:
With 6'0 Nate Diaz:
Click Here
With 5'11.5 - 6'0 Royce Gracie:
Click Here
With 5'9 - 5'10 GSP:
Click Here
With 5'9 Kelly Rohrback:
Click Here
With 5'10.5 Erin Heatherton
Click Here
The Suitpictures are irrelevant!
He is clearly 5'10.
His height is obvious in these pictures:
With 6'0 Nate Diaz:
Click Here
With 5'11.5 - 6'0 Royce Gracie:
Click Here
With 5'9 - 5'10 GSP:
Click Here
With 5'9 Kelly Rohrback:
Click Here
With 5'10.5 Erin Heatherton
Click Here
The Suitpictures are irrelevant!
He is clearly 5'10.
Sam said on 6/Jan/17
He's been listed as 182cm before and I think Rob and many others agree that would probably be his most, wouldn't be 183cm, so 181cm seems like a good compromise. I wouldn't put him lower than 5'11.
He's been listed as 182cm before and I think Rob and many others agree that would probably be his most, wouldn't be 183cm, so 181cm seems like a good compromise. I wouldn't put him lower than 5'11.
mr manson said on 2/Jan/17
Weird i met Leo in 2005 he was about 5'9 ..i guess he grew the last few years
Weird i met Leo in 2005 he was about 5'9 ..i guess he grew the last few years
John V. said on 1/Jan/17
Hey Rob, you don't seem so convinced about his current listed height. If so, can you tell me what makes you think he is taller than this?
Editor Rob
Hey Rob, you don't seem so convinced about his current listed height. If so, can you tell me what makes you think he is taller than this?
Editor Rob 181 I think is fine for him, at times he could appear a bit shy or even closer to 182.
Joel said on 1/Jan/17
Definitely 182cm he is closer to 6 foot than he is 5"11.
Definitely 182cm he is closer to 6 foot than he is 5"11.
Sam said on 30/Dec/16
I thought he looked 12/13 when he had his first interview at 16, I think he was even more behind Bieber physically, so its not surprising he grew a noticeable several inches after.
I thought he looked 12/13 when he had his first interview at 16, I think he was even more behind Bieber physically, so its not surprising he grew a noticeable several inches after.
hr said on 21/Dec/16
5'11. why do folks think he is 6'1
5'11. why do folks think he is 6'1
lolo said on 21/Dec/16
5'11.5 (182cm) peak
5'11.25 (181cm) now?
5'11.5 (182cm) peak
5'11.25 (181cm) now?
Johno said on 18/Dec/16
I wouldn't put him at 5'11 and over.
I wouldn't put him at 5'11 and over.
Steve said on 13/Dec/16
Sometimes can look a tad under 5'11 but can also look a tad over. Probably just a solid 5'11.
Sometimes can look a tad under 5'11 but can also look a tad over. Probably just a solid 5'11.
Gaza2121 said on 13/Dec/16
Nope. Rob has seen Tom Hardy in person and says he's 5'9" minimum. Leo and a good 2 inches on Hardy so that puts him at least 5'11". 5'9" is a joke.
Nope. Rob has seen Tom Hardy in person and says he's 5'9" minimum. Leo and a good 2 inches on Hardy so that puts him at least 5'11". 5'9" is a joke.
Garrett said on 12/Dec/16
Look at Leo in wolf of Wall Street. He is in bare feet one of the scenes and he looks about MAX 4 inches taller than Margot Robbie! She is like 5'4! That means his true height is 5'9! All of you people saying 5'11 need to look again LOL
Look at Leo in wolf of Wall Street. He is in bare feet one of the scenes and he looks about MAX 4 inches taller than Margot Robbie! She is like 5'4! That means his true height is 5'9! All of you people saying 5'11 need to look again LOL
Randy said on 9/Dec/16
Oh then you are wrong hahaha
Oh then you are wrong hahaha
Gaza2121 said on 6/Dec/16
Randy, actually that was meant for Tom Hardy haha. I agree with Leo's listing actually.
Randy, actually that was meant for Tom Hardy haha. I agree with Leo's listing actually.
Randy said on 5/Dec/16
Gaza you are completely right
Gaza you are completely right
Spencer said on 2/Dec/16
Looks about 4.5 inches taller than Winslet in Titanic. I don't think he is anything over 5'11. Hanks looks an incher taller in Catch Me if You Can. He is slightly above average height for a man.
Looks about 4.5 inches taller than Winslet in Titanic. I don't think he is anything over 5'11. Hanks looks an incher taller in Catch Me if You Can. He is slightly above average height for a man.
Gaza2121 said on 2/Dec/16
Trey, pics or it didn't happen.
Trey, pics or it didn't happen.
Trey said on 29/Nov/16
No way he is any taller than 5'9. I have literally met him and he short
No way he is any taller than 5'9. I have literally met him and he short
vaiski said on 28/Nov/16
According to photographic evidence, I was exactly the same height as my older brother, 175cm or 5'9, when I was 17 years and 8 months old. I grew to be 181cm or 5'11.25 by the time I was 19. Growing 3 inches between 17-20 seems plausible to me.
Editor Rob
According to photographic evidence, I was exactly the same height as my older brother, 175cm or 5'9, when I was 17 years and 8 months old. I grew to be 181cm or 5'11.25 by the time I was 19. Growing 3 inches between 17-20 seems plausible to me.
Editor Rob physically DiCaprio was behind the curve and underdeveloped. It's not a huge surprise, a bit like a Bieber, looking 15 when he's about 18-19.
Johno said on 27/Nov/16
I have seen guys gain height at 18; my mate went from around 5'6.5-5'7 at 18 and half years to 5'9 at 22 and his younger brother i believe gained even more; honestly he is around 6'0 now but i reckon he went from 5'8 to 6'0 between the ages of 18 to 23? Somewhere like that. These late height growth spurts seem to run through families.
Both of them however, did not seem have gone through advance puberty by the age of 18; they looked really young. Honestly, like 14-year olds at 18-19 and basically teenagers in their early 20s so i guess the onset of puberty has something to do with it. Speaking anecdotally, if you look very young at 18, you got some chance to grow and what i mean by growth is, at least 2-inches and up to 4-inches that i have actually witnessed. If one of your older siblings has goon through similar growth pattern spurts, then chances are, so can you.
Another mate was around 5'8-ish at 16-17 and now he is 5'11-ish.
I am not so sure Brad Pitt went through the same process though. First of all, he looked like a normal guy, going through regular puberty and looked mature and developed enough; nothing like Dicaprio and Ralph Macchio and secondly; any material growth beyond the usual years looks to be rare. I am not prepared to give Pitt that verdict of confidence.
I have seen guys gain height at 18; my mate went from around 5'6.5-5'7 at 18 and half years to 5'9 at 22 and his younger brother i believe gained even more; honestly he is around 6'0 now but i reckon he went from 5'8 to 6'0 between the ages of 18 to 23? Somewhere like that. These late height growth spurts seem to run through families.
Both of them however, did not seem have gone through advance puberty by the age of 18; they looked really young. Honestly, like 14-year olds at 18-19 and basically teenagers in their early 20s so i guess the onset of puberty has something to do with it. Speaking anecdotally, if you look very young at 18, you got some chance to grow and what i mean by growth is, at least 2-inches and up to 4-inches that i have actually witnessed. If one of your older siblings has goon through similar growth pattern spurts, then chances are, so can you.
Another mate was around 5'8-ish at 16-17 and now he is 5'11-ish.
I am not so sure Brad Pitt went through the same process though. First of all, he looked like a normal guy, going through regular puberty and looked mature and developed enough; nothing like Dicaprio and Ralph Macchio and secondly; any material growth beyond the usual years looks to be rare. I am not prepared to give Pitt that verdict of confidence.
Hafeez said on 26/Nov/16
So rob :
By your reply to giorgi !
You're saying he gained more than 3 inshes from 18 - 20 ?
Editor Rob
So rob :
By your reply to giorgi !
You're saying he gained more than 3 inshes from 18 - 20 ?
Editor Rob depends on the exact filming dates of This Boy's Life, but certainly from age 17-21 he gained 3 inches
Johnson said on 26/Nov/16
@James I agree most guys stop growing up at the frame 14-17 years old. Others can extend 18-19. 20-21 is less common. Mistakes in measurement are very usual that is why we need several tests
@James I agree most guys stop growing up at the frame 14-17 years old. Others can extend 18-19. 20-21 is less common. Mistakes in measurement are very usual that is why we need several tests
spainmen191cm said on 25/Nov/16
@James
Well thats your opinion, in my case Im 20 right know and im almost 6ft4 (6ft3.5-75 at night) In 3 months I will be 21. And I was a late bloomer at 14 I was pretty short, but then I started to sprout up. Also at 18-19 I was 6ft2.75, so I grew almost an inch after that age. The majority of men stop around 18 but there is a small percentage that grow till 21-22 look at Ralph Macchio!
@James
Well thats your opinion, in my case Im 20 right know and im almost 6ft4 (6ft3.5-75 at night) In 3 months I will be 21. And I was a late bloomer at 14 I was pretty short, but then I started to sprout up. Also at 18-19 I was 6ft2.75, so I grew almost an inch after that age. The majority of men stop around 18 but there is a small percentage that grow till 21-22 look at Ralph Macchio!
Giorgi said on 24/Nov/16
Rob, how tall do you think he was in This Boy's Life? I think he didn't look more than 5'7" next to Ellen Barkin.
Editor Rob
Rob, how tall do you think he was in This Boy's Life? I think he didn't look more than 5'7" next to Ellen Barkin.
Editor Rob Giorgi, he probably was roughly 5ft 8 at nearly 18 and gained around 18-20 range.
James said on 23/Nov/16
@Spainmen191cm Men stop growing in height when they are between 18 and 19 years old. I don't know if someone exceptionally could grow until 20 but definetely no more. The idea that people still grow in height until 21 is a myth not based on rigorous scientific evidence. But you are suggesting DiCaprio could have been growing after 21!! After 21 is impossible to remain growing in height. So yes, DiCaprio was already fully grown in Romeo and Juliet. I think some people get confused and think they have grown after 20 because they have been incorrectly measured on other occasions.
For example, when I was 20 years old I was once measured as 1.83. When I was 25 I was measured as 1.84. Does it mean I grew after 20? Nope, I was incorrectly measured as 1.83 that's the reason.
@Spainmen191cm Men stop growing in height when they are between 18 and 19 years old. I don't know if someone exceptionally could grow until 20 but definetely no more. The idea that people still grow in height until 21 is a myth not based on rigorous scientific evidence. But you are suggesting DiCaprio could have been growing after 21!! After 21 is impossible to remain growing in height. So yes, DiCaprio was already fully grown in Romeo and Juliet. I think some people get confused and think they have grown after 20 because they have been incorrectly measured on other occasions.
For example, when I was 20 years old I was once measured as 1.83. When I was 25 I was measured as 1.84. Does it mean I grew after 20? Nope, I was incorrectly measured as 1.83 that's the reason.
spainmen191cm said on 21/Nov/16
Rob, do you think that in Romeo and Juliet film, when he was 21-22, was fully grown?
Rob, do you think that in Romeo and Juliet film, when he was 21-22, was fully grown?
hm said on 20/Nov/16
he looks a few inches shorter then 6'4 John Kerry for that film "Before The Flood" I'm guessing he wore lifts for that too?
he looks a few inches shorter then 6'4 John Kerry for that film "Before The Flood" I'm guessing he wore lifts for that too?
HonestSlovene said on 20/Nov/16
He does look more 5'11.5 than 5'11 flat (though he can often look that as well) but never seems 5'11.75" or even 6'0" flat. Not to mention the sub 5'11" claims for him are also extremely ridiculous. 5'11.25" is probably his absolute low (5'11.5" regular low) and he hangs at 181-182 cm range during the day IMHO. A weak 5'11.5".
He does look more 5'11.5 than 5'11 flat (though he can often look that as well) but never seems 5'11.75" or even 6'0" flat. Not to mention the sub 5'11" claims for him are also extremely ridiculous. 5'11.25" is probably his absolute low (5'11.5" regular low) and he hangs at 181-182 cm range during the day IMHO. A weak 5'11.5".
Johnny said on 18/Nov/16
@Rob what was Big G's estimation of Leo's height?
Editor Rob
@Rob what was Big G's estimation of Leo's height?
Editor Rob Johnny, at least six foot range
Dmeyer said on 17/Nov/16
Looks about 4cm on 177cm damon
Looks about 4cm on 177cm damon
Truth said on 17/Nov/16
People are blinded by their love for him. He's 180cm max
People are blinded by their love for him. He's 180cm max
S.J.H said on 15/Nov/16
@Daniel said on 11/Nov/16
Like the journalist who met Leo in person said that he was not over 5'10. Might be a myth if not Tom Hardy would be 5'8 no more and that would put nathan jones at 6'8 not 6'9 - 6'10
@Daniel said on 11/Nov/16
Like the journalist who met Leo in person said that he was not over 5'10. Might be a myth if not Tom Hardy would be 5'8 no more and that would put nathan jones at 6'8 not 6'9 - 6'10
trumpslave said on 12/Nov/16
Leo definitely is 182 cm just look at his pictures with matt damon he is way taller than him and in the pictures with tom hanks he is wearing very flat shoes and tom clearly is wearing high heel shoes
Leo definitely is 182 cm just look at his pictures with matt damon he is way taller than him and in the pictures with tom hanks he is wearing very flat shoes and tom clearly is wearing high heel shoes
Daniel said on 11/Nov/16
He can't be over 5'10
He can't be over 5'10
Ryan said on 8/Nov/16
Y'all are trippin...he is 5'9 and a half max!
Y'all are trippin...he is 5'9 and a half max!
Dionisio Rojas said on 5/Nov/16
Definitely 1.80-1.81 no more!. Nice to see that heights are getting more accurate!!!
Definitely 1.80-1.81 no more!. Nice to see that heights are getting more accurate!!!
Animus said on 4/Nov/16
He often seems taller than a flat 5'11", but it's hard to argue 5'11.5" seeing him next to Tom Hanks. Hanks could look a full inch taller than DiCaprio back in the day, which is close to impossible, if they have similar footwear and are separated by only half an inch. (I don't think Hanks consistently wore thicker shoes than DiCaprio and I don't think DiCaprio's posture is that awful.)
5'11.25" is probably the best listing for DiCaprio, but I think it's close to his absolute low - he often looks 5'11.5".
He often seems taller than a flat 5'11", but it's hard to argue 5'11.5" seeing him next to Tom Hanks. Hanks could look a full inch taller than DiCaprio back in the day, which is close to impossible, if they have similar footwear and are separated by only half an inch. (I don't think Hanks consistently wore thicker shoes than DiCaprio and I don't think DiCaprio's posture is that awful.)
5'11.25" is probably the best listing for DiCaprio, but I think it's close to his absolute low - he often looks 5'11.5".
Giorgi said on 4/Nov/16
Rob, can you tell exactly how many cm heels is she wearing?
Editor Rob
Rob, can you tell exactly how many cm heels is she wearing?
Editor Rob Giorgi, who do you mean? Cate? If so, 7cm at least, possibly a little bit more as it is a highish angle.
Anon said on 2/Nov/16
5 feet 11 3/8 inches...he didn't look to much shorter than Obama, looked 5 11.5 inches
5 feet 11 3/8 inches...he didn't look to much shorter than Obama, looked 5 11.5 inches
Cristofer said on 31/Oct/16
1.82 day 1.80 night
1.82 day 1.80 night
CS said on 31/Oct/16
@Chris there's photos of Leo with Obama where Leo looks 5'11 and other photos where Leo looks 5'11.5. This listing is a great middle point and honestly out of all the heights Leo looks, the average does come out somewhere pretty close to 181 cm. This listing is fine and probably as accurate as we are going to get.
@Chris there's photos of Leo with Obama where Leo looks 5'11 and other photos where Leo looks 5'11.5. This listing is a great middle point and honestly out of all the heights Leo looks, the average does come out somewhere pretty close to 181 cm. This listing is fine and probably as accurate as we are going to get.
Chris said on 31/Oct/16
Solid 6'1 Obama cleared him 2 inches, 180cm flat is a better shout Rob!
Solid 6'1 Obama cleared him 2 inches, 180cm flat is a better shout Rob!
Tiago said on 30/Oct/16
He is just a typical 5'11 guy, no more
He is just a typical 5'11 guy, no more
Brandon W. said on 29/Oct/16
Check out pic with UFC fighter Nick Diaz 6ft
Check out pic with UFC fighter Nick Diaz 6ft
Animus said on 28/Oct/16
Rob, did he wear lifts in "The Aviator" to play the 6ft3 Howard Hughes? He looks over six feet with John C. Reilly.
Editor Rob
Rob, did he wear lifts in "The Aviator" to play the 6ft3 Howard Hughes? He looks over six feet with John C. Reilly.
Editor Rob I believe he slipped a little lift in his shoes for that role.
CS said on 27/Oct/16
Rob how much do you reckon he weighed in Titanic? How about now?
Rob how much do you reckon he weighed in Titanic? How about now?
josh jeffords said on 25/Oct/16
Just watched departed again leo is much taller than a clearly under 5 10 mat damon.
Both are shorter than the aging alec baldwin and way taller than little marky mark.
Quick math says leo is weak 5 11 down to strong 5 10 damon is a strong 5 8 .5 max.
This is the tallest I ever remember leo looking he usually look 5 10 if that.
Weird build and not great posture/fitness seem to make him look smaller.
He looked a weak 5 10 in blood diamond with the 6 2 cast members.
Even smaller in Quick and the dead only time hackman looked 6 2.
Just watched departed again leo is much taller than a clearly under 5 10 mat damon.
Both are shorter than the aging alec baldwin and way taller than little marky mark.
Quick math says leo is weak 5 11 down to strong 5 10 damon is a strong 5 8 .5 max.
This is the tallest I ever remember leo looking he usually look 5 10 if that.
Weird build and not great posture/fitness seem to make him look smaller.
He looked a weak 5 10 in blood diamond with the 6 2 cast members.
Even smaller in Quick and the dead only time hackman looked 6 2.
Justbringit said on 24/Oct/16
Tbh in the most recent pics I see in this site he looks taller than 5'11 more like 5'11.5"
Tbh in the most recent pics I see in this site he looks taller than 5'11 more like 5'11.5"
Giorgi said on 19/Oct/16
Next to 191 cm John Kerry.
Click Here
How would you measure him based solely on this photo, Rob?
Editor Rob
Next to 191 cm John Kerry.
Click Here
How would you measure him based solely on this photo, Rob?
Editor Rob he could be in the 3 inch range under Kerry there.
S.J.H said on 19/Oct/16
Obama is def 2" taller than leo. Leo is just a decent 5'11 guy. For anyone wanted to say obama is higher than 6'1 to bring up leo height then they should refer to see how 186ish tony parker edge out obama easily a 1/2' close up
Obama is def 2" taller than leo. Leo is just a decent 5'11 guy. For anyone wanted to say obama is higher than 6'1 to bring up leo height then they should refer to see how 186ish tony parker edge out obama easily a 1/2' close up
Johnny said on 17/Oct/16
@Rob what do you think of this photo? Leo looks the same height as Tarantino. Click Here
Editor Rob
@Rob what do you think of this photo? Leo looks the same height as Tarantino. Click Here
Editor Rob Quentin could just be losing a good 1-2 inches in posture there, Leo is standing pretty decent in comparison.
shiva 181 cms said on 16/Oct/16
His listing his nailed on he looks 5'11 as well as 5'11.5
His listing his nailed on he looks 5'11 as well as 5'11.5
shiva 181 cms said on 16/Oct/16
His listing his nailed on he looks 5'11 as well as 5'11.5
His listing his nailed on he looks 5'11 as well as 5'11.5
177-178 cm guy said on 16/Oct/16
Hey Rob. How much taller does Obama look than Leo in this video at the beginning. A bit over an inch?
Click Here
Editor Rob
Hey Rob. How much taller does Obama look than Leo in this video at the beginning. A bit over an inch?
Click Here
Editor Rob from the clip you could still make an argument he looked 5ft 11.5
177-178 cm guy said on 16/Oct/16
@Bobby Leo looks at least 5'11" in these pictures of him next to Obama if he's actually 6'1":
Click Here
Click Here
@Bobby Leo looks at least 5'11" in these pictures of him next to Obama if he's actually 6'1":
Click Here
Click Here
Celebheights 6'1.5" said on 13/Oct/16
With Morgan Freeman:
tinyurl.com/z7mz7kv
Leo is closer to the camera, but I still only see two inches between them.
With Morgan Freeman:
tinyurl.com/z7mz7kv
Leo is closer to the camera, but I still only see two inches between them.
Bobby said on 12/Oct/16
Are we really going to question the fact that di Caprio is no longer quite 6'0? The picture I saw of him next to Obama shows a least a three inch difference in my opinion, it's possible he is closer to 5'10.5 but in Hollywood, he is 6'0 feet tall.
Are we really going to question the fact that di Caprio is no longer quite 6'0? The picture I saw of him next to Obama shows a least a three inch difference in my opinion, it's possible he is closer to 5'10.5 but in Hollywood, he is 6'0 feet tall.
Sam said on 11/Oct/16
Looks to be in the upper 5'11 range, which I always figured was the start of weak-tall.
Looks to be in the upper 5'11 range, which I always figured was the start of weak-tall.
Dmeyer said on 11/Oct/16
Hé can realy look 5 ft 10,75 up to 5 ft 11,75 , mostly 5 ft 11-11,5 ,
Hé can realy look 5 ft 10,75 up to 5 ft 11,75 , mostly 5 ft 11-11,5 ,
Johan said on 10/Oct/16
If Leo is 180 max then Orlando bloom is no more than 177 cm. Gets listed at 179 cm.
If Leo is 180 max then Orlando bloom is no more than 177 cm. Gets listed at 179 cm.
yaniv maor said on 9/Oct/16
exactly 180cm ...slouching makes him look sometimes like a 178cm
exactly 180cm ...slouching makes him look sometimes like a 178cm
Peter 179cm said on 6/Oct/16
@ D There's more chance he's 179-180cm than 181-182 range,though...Various pictures suggest that, i mean look at him with 175 Mario Lopez he barely even pass for 5'10 next to him ( 177-178 range).The max i'd give him is 180cm range so basically 5'11 or a fraction under it.
@ D There's more chance he's 179-180cm than 181-182 range,though...Various pictures suggest that, i mean look at him with 175 Mario Lopez he barely even pass for 5'10 next to him ( 177-178 range).The max i'd give him is 180cm range so basically 5'11 or a fraction under it.
justbringit said on 6/Oct/16
i have to say that i don't agree with 5'11 for him i think he is taller than that in fact i would say at least a solid 5'11.25 or maybe even 5'11.5"
i have to say that i don't agree with 5'11 for him i think he is taller than that in fact i would say at least a solid 5'11.25 or maybe even 5'11.5"
D said on 2/Oct/16
Peter, if Leo is 1.79 I can assure you that Damon is 1.75 and Pitt is 1.76.
Peter, if Leo is 1.79 I can assure you that Damon is 1.75 and Pitt is 1.76.
Peter 179cm said on 1/Oct/16
He barely looks 177-178cm next to officially listed 185 Obama who might actually be 184 at his low. I would guess at most 180cm for Leo after various pictures. He might be 181 in the morning,but by dinner-time no more than a strong 179/weak 180.
He barely looks 177-178cm next to officially listed 185 Obama who might actually be 184 at his low. I would guess at most 180cm for Leo after various pictures. He might be 181 in the morning,but by dinner-time no more than a strong 179/weak 180.
S.J.H said on 1/Oct/16
I watch Titanic twice i have see a proper 5'11 for leo not more. The 0.25 is a myth or just a morning height
I watch Titanic twice i have see a proper 5'11 for leo not more. The 0.25 is a myth or just a morning height
Johno said on 30/Sep/16
I suspect the difference might be greater than 2-inches there Hello.
I suspect the difference might be greater than 2-inches there Hello.
Hafeez said on 30/Sep/16
Hey rob : i have two questions about leonardo ...
1 : do you think that leonardo dicaprio grow some inshes or cm's afte the age 18 to his mid 20's ?
2 : if first question is yes !
Then how much do you think he gained ?
Thank you rob
Much love from libya <3
Editor Rob
Hey rob : i have two questions about leonardo ...
1 : do you think that leonardo dicaprio grow some inshes or cm's afte the age 18 to his mid 20's ?
2 : if first question is yes !
Then how much do you think he gained ?
Thank you rob
Much love from libya <3
Editor Rob from 18 to 21 he did gain something, how much I am still not exactly sure, at least an inch anyway.
Hello said on 30/Sep/16
Saw a picture of him next to Obama, looked a good two inches shorter than him, no idea what the footwear situation was.
Click Here
Saw a picture of him next to Obama, looked a good two inches shorter than him, no idea what the footwear situation was.
Click Here
Allen said on 29/Sep/16
I think this listing is accurate. Though he has a bad posture that at times he looks more like 179-178cm. But if he stands straight and keeps his good posture he definitely is 181cm. Very accurate listing in my opinion.
I think this listing is accurate. Though he has a bad posture that at times he looks more like 179-178cm. But if he stands straight and keeps his good posture he definitely is 181cm. Very accurate listing in my opinion.
BT said on 29/Sep/16
Imo he looks 5'11 flat mostly, at times it's a toss-up between that and 5'11.25 for me.
Imo he looks 5'11 flat mostly, at times it's a toss-up between that and 5'11.25 for me.
Johno said on 27/Sep/16
Here is Mario Lopez with Beckham
Click Here
Here he is with Leo,
Click Here
Beckham would be taller than Leo.
Here is Mario Lopez with Beckham
Click Here
Here he is with Leo,
Click Here
Beckham would be taller than Leo.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.