Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/May/22
I think in those boots he's 6ft2 so this listing is more than fair
Darksol64 said on 6/May/22
He's holding his head/neck/back down quite a bit so I think he comfortably clears 6 ft. No matter how extreme of a low he hits he would break 6 ft by at least a tenth or two.
6'0.5 is definitely possible and a good guess.
ChaosControl said on 3/Aug/21
All things considered I think he’s just 6’0
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Jun/21
Honestly a minimum 6ft0½ dude in those thick work boots should be able to clear 6ft2
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Jun/21
Baguetteboing, 6ft0½ actually converts to 184.15cm but sure you're more or less on the money
Baguetteboing said on 9/Jun/21
Did the math in paint. Hes 673 pixels tall. Rob is 633. Using 173cm as a base, Joseph here would be exactly 183.93cm. 6'0½.
Mikester said on 28/Mar/21
the top of his head seems taller than 182...
OriginalAnon said on 14/Dec/20
He looks shorter than 184cm in this photo with Rob. He looks like a 182cm max guy. I think he is most certainly an exaggerator and might be conscious about his height considering his footwear.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Nov/20
Rob, would you say in those boots he's hitting 6ft2?
Editor Rob
not too far off it...
houss said on 27/Jun/20
So i think he's no more than 182cm
Editor Rob
In person I don't think Joseph was as short as 182cm.
houss said on 26/Jun/20
@rob 😂😂 i'm sorry hhh this is the pic
Click Here
Editor Rob
It seems close to 4 inches there
houss said on 25/Jun/20
Click Here
The short guy is 174cm barefeet , i'm 182'5cm barefeet, no footwear advantage for anyone of us , i think the difference between us is a little more bigger than the difference between rob and joseph , what do you think rob
Editor Rob
hard to tell with a private instagram 😉 Always best reuploading a photo to something like imgur.com
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/May/20
I wouldn't guess lower than what Rob has him at...looks safely over 6ft flat. In boots I reckon he's easily walking around at 6ft2
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Sep/19
Weak 6ft1 is possible for him I think
berta said on 10/May/19
possible heights from 183,5-185. I think legit 184, maybe 184,5 range
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 23/Nov/18
@Zampo
I agree, 6'0.25"
Zampo said on 22/Nov/18
Doesn't quite look this listing. He looks like he could measure a solid 6'0.25 range (183.5-183.8) possibly. Think he is losing some mm with his slight lean to his left.
Nik said on 26/Jun/18
This listing seems reasonable, he may be fractionally less but not any more!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Dec/17
Rob, is a weak 6ft1 possible?
Editor Rob
6ft 0.75 isn't impossible, though that would have been the maximum I'd guess in person.
John said on 27/Mar/17
He's 6'0.25.
TJE said on 27/Jan/16
If Joey straightened up, he would be very close to looking over Rob's head, but he still won't. Maybe 0.25 inch under.
So let's do the math.
68.125-0.25=67.875
Joey's eyes are at 5'7 7/8. Rob says his eye level is 4.5-4.75 so I'll go with 4.625.
67.875+4.625=72.5
Joey is 6'0.5 when up straight but he has 1/4-1/3 inch more shoes; average of that is roughly 0.3 inch.
72.5-0.3=72.2
Conclusion, Joey is 6'0.2.
6'0.25 would be a fine listing.
iggity said on 24/Jan/16
What height do you think his eyes are Rob?
Editor Rob
I think normal 4.5-4.75 range, but tilt your eyes down a fraction and you get nearer 5 inches.
Andrea said on 21/Jan/16
Dmeyer, where do you see 181?
To me, he does look 4 inches taller than Rob. Rob is 173-174, so you could say this guy looks 183-184 range in the picture above... Of course, you must take a fraction away for the bigger footwear which would make him more 6' flat... But i wouldn't say he looks under 6'!
Dmeyer said on 20/Jan/16
He must be 183-4cm but in the pic looks 181 max as he has more footwear , he looks under 6ft even thaugh more footwear
Andrea said on 20/Jan/16
While i certainly wouldn't go as low as 5'11.5 he looks more 6' flat here...
Rob, do you think 6' is possible or he is over it for sure?
Editor Rob
I do think he'd clear 6ft.
TJE said on 19/Jan/16
6'0-6'0.25 would be fine.
Kourosh said on 19/Jan/16
5'11.5 barefoot and 6'0.5 with shoes on.
downgrade rob
Editor Rob
he never looked that short
Aza said on 18/Jan/16
Looks strong 6ft even if you take way the footwear advantage.
Jim Hopper said on 17/Jan/16
Haha why do 6-0" guys say 6-2"??? Insecurities??? Hes at most 6-0,Id say those shoes have a good insole in them.
Rick said on 17/Jan/16
Take them boots off of his and he would be smaller than rob 5'7 barefoot no more.
Fluffi Fluffsson said on 16/Jan/16
What a liar. He is an adult ffs...
guk said on 16/Jan/16
This is suprising as he's one of the tallest actors on banished quite a bit taller than David Wenham who you have down as 5ft 10. Looks more than 2.5 inches. Maybe Wenham isnt quite 5ft 10?
Andrea said on 16/Jan/16
Yeah, he looks a bit like him... If he has more footwear, i'd say he looks more 6' flat here, though! He looks about 4 inches taller than you, without considering any footwear advantage...
John said on 16/Jan/16
No more than 5'11.5"-6'0" for Millson. He barely has 3.5 inches on Rob, and you also have to take into consideration that Millson has 1/3 inch more footwear advantage with those thick boots of his.
Mat said on 16/Jan/16
Rob, mention the footwear in the description. He does seem taller than your listing in the photo, but I think it's because of his boot.
Andrea said on 15/Jan/16
Rob, i just seen this guy in 24 LAD! He had a small part but he certainly didn't look a big 6'2 guy!
I guessed him somewhere in 6' range!!!
He looks maybe 183-184 with you... Does he have more footwear, right?
Editor Rob
between 1/4 and 1/3. Funnily reminded me of a slightly smaller version of challenger 2 in person. Both thought or claimed 6ft 2 as well...
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Jan/16
That's a boots height for sure.
Rick said on 15/Jan/16
I dont see 4 inches here. Looks 5'11 and a half at a push but never 6'. If he was 6' he would tower over rob which he doesn't in the photo.