John Goodman's Height
6ft 1 (185.4 cm)
Peak height was 6ft 2 (188 cm)
American actor best known for roles in TV sitcom Roseanne and films such as The Big Lebowski, Monsters Inc, Inside Llewyn Davis, 10 Cloverfield Lane, The Babe, King Ralph, Barton Fink, Argo and The Flintstones. In 2016 he mentioned his weight: "Of course, I weigh 300 pounds".
Photo PR Photos
I went to take my physical. But they measured me two inches shorter than I am. They measured me at six foot instead of six foot two. I was eleven pounds overweight for that height. They told me to lose weight and come back. By the time I was scheduled to come back, the draft was abolished.
- Esquire (24/12/08)
John & Chevy Chase in 2011
Photo kathclick/BigStock.com
Photo kathclick/BigStock.com
You May Be Interested
Bill Murray
6ft 1 (185 cm)
6ft 1 (185 cm)
John Candy
6ft 2 (188 cm)
6ft 2 (188 cm)
John Belushi
5ft 7 (170 cm)
5ft 7 (170 cm)
Dan Aykroyd
6ft 0 (183 cm)
6ft 0 (183 cm)
Add a Comment288 comments
Average Guess (62 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 1.92in (187.7cm)
Current: 6ft 0.61in (184.4cm)
Peak: 6ft 1.92in (187.7cm)
Current: 6ft 0.61in (184.4cm)
MareZ said on 6/Jun/23
for the big lebowski he had slimmed down enough i think about 270 lbs
for the big lebowski he had slimmed down enough i think about 270 lbs
Slim1.75m said on 2/Mar/23
So Rob please guess what's his Weight is now I can't find it anywhere
Editor Rob
So Rob please guess what's his Weight is now I can't find it anywhere
Editor RobYour guess would be as good as mine.
Slim1.75m said on 19/Sep/22
Hey Rob is under 6'1 arguable for john now.
Editor Rob
Hey Rob is under 6'1 arguable for john now.
Editor RobYeah he likely is a bit shy of that.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Jul/22
I think he can still clear 6ft today. Worst case 6ft0½
I think he can still clear 6ft today. Worst case 6ft0½
Boyg said on 1/Mar/22
In righteous gemstones he looks about 6’ and change. Although I bet he is still close to 6’2” in shoes.
In righteous gemstones he looks about 6’ and change. Although I bet he is still close to 6’2” in shoes.
Darksol64 said on 27/Nov/21
definitely a big guy in his prime. Easily 6'2 probably a little more. My guess is 6'2 and a quarter easily. Can't believe a few people said 5'11" PEAK...it's not possible that he didn't break 6 ft. 0% chance. I'd be surprised if he was anything below 6'2. Like, I'm 99% sure he was at least 6'2.
Struggling to hold 6'0 nowadays. I'll give him 5'11 and 3 quarters. Looks really short in the top pic and is easily 2 inches shorter than the 6'3 guy in the second pic and that was 2011.
definitely a big guy in his prime. Easily 6'2 probably a little more. My guess is 6'2 and a quarter easily. Can't believe a few people said 5'11" PEAK...it's not possible that he didn't break 6 ft. 0% chance. I'd be surprised if he was anything below 6'2. Like, I'm 99% sure he was at least 6'2.
Struggling to hold 6'0 nowadays. I'll give him 5'11 and 3 quarters. Looks really short in the top pic and is easily 2 inches shorter than the 6'3 guy in the second pic and that was 2011.
Tall Sam said on 26/Sep/21
I wouldn’t be surprised if Goodman had size 13 shoes or something, like many men do of around my height 6’4”-6’5”. He’s got pretty large proportions and seems a genuinely powerful guy despite his wildly fluctuating weight.
I wouldn’t be surprised if Goodman had size 13 shoes or something, like many men do of around my height 6’4”-6’5”. He’s got pretty large proportions and seems a genuinely powerful guy despite his wildly fluctuating weight.
Annoneemous said on 24/Sep/21
Couldn't guess height, but his footprints at the Grauman's Chinese Theater were enormous. My 9.5 size shoe matched just about dead on with everyone from Bruce Willis to Jack Nicholson to Ben Stiller to Johnny Depp. John's foot had to be a solid 4-5 inches longer than mine. Jeff Bridges surprisingly large too, feet and hands matched up identically with my 6'2 300 lb buddy. They can't be too far off from their estimated heights
Couldn't guess height, but his footprints at the Grauman's Chinese Theater were enormous. My 9.5 size shoe matched just about dead on with everyone from Bruce Willis to Jack Nicholson to Ben Stiller to Johnny Depp. John's foot had to be a solid 4-5 inches longer than mine. Jeff Bridges surprisingly large too, feet and hands matched up identically with my 6'2 300 lb buddy. They can't be too far off from their estimated heights
BT said on 8/Apr/21
@FriedChicken: He was morbidly obese for a long time and around the age where most men start to drop height anyway, his discs were probably quite compressed hence the seemingly big early height loss. The state he was in he's lucky all he lost was some height...
Peak was definitely near 6'2, by mid/late 50's with someone like Affleck and Cranston he looked barely 6ft at times, but he could probably squeeze into 184-185 range standing tall at that point. He was noticably taller than someone like Dan Aykroyd when both were near peak, recently he looks very similar to him though so 6ft flat might be possible by now.
@FriedChicken: He was morbidly obese for a long time and around the age where most men start to drop height anyway, his discs were probably quite compressed hence the seemingly big early height loss. The state he was in he's lucky all he lost was some height...
Peak was definitely near 6'2, by mid/late 50's with someone like Affleck and Cranston he looked barely 6ft at times, but he could probably squeeze into 184-185 range standing tall at that point. He was noticably taller than someone like Dan Aykroyd when both were near peak, recently he looks very similar to him though so 6ft flat might be possible by now.
FriedChicken said on 17/Nov/20
Is there any reason how he could've lost at least an inch in his 60s? Could it have been his weight before he lost it? As far as i know he hasn't had any major injuries or back/knee surgery. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Is there any reason how he could've lost at least an inch in his 60s? Could it have been his weight before he lost it? As far as i know he hasn't had any major injuries or back/knee surgery. Correct me if I'm wrong.
FriedChicken said on 7/Nov/20
He was a solid 6'2" at his peak but nowadays i wouldn't be surprised if under 6 ft 1.
He was a solid 6'2" at his peak but nowadays i wouldn't be surprised if under 6 ft 1.
KY135 said on 17/Aug/20
Rob, in ‘True Stories’ his character says “I’m 6’3” and maintain a very consistent panda bear shape.”
Rob, in ‘True Stories’ his character says “I’m 6’3” and maintain a very consistent panda bear shape.”
Sinclair said on 9/Aug/20
I would agree that Goodman appears to be approximately one inch taller than both Jeff Bridges in The Big Lebowski and Richard Jenkins in Sea of Love. I would give Goodman the flat 6’2” for his peak height.
I would agree that Goodman appears to be approximately one inch taller than both Jeff Bridges in The Big Lebowski and Richard Jenkins in Sea of Love. I would give Goodman the flat 6’2” for his peak height.
Jtm said on 25/Jul/20
If he was 6'0 peak then Jeff bridges was 5'11 peak , John turturro is 5'9, Fred Willard was 5'11 peak(many believe he was 6'2 peak), and Denzel Washington was 5'10 or less peak. Sorry but I really doubt he was as low as 6'0 peak.
If he was 6'0 peak then Jeff bridges was 5'11 peak , John turturro is 5'9, Fred Willard was 5'11 peak(many believe he was 6'2 peak), and Denzel Washington was 5'10 or less peak. Sorry but I really doubt he was as low as 6'0 peak.
HeightRealist said on 21/Jul/20
Sorry Rob, but John was never close to 6'2. He stands at best 5'11.5 . I'm giving him 183 cm peak and 180 cm nowadays.
He is about an inch shorter than nowadays 184cm Bill Murray.
Sorry Rob, but John was never close to 6'2. He stands at best 5'11.5 . I'm giving him 183 cm peak and 180 cm nowadays.
He is about an inch shorter than nowadays 184cm Bill Murray.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 20/Jun/20
🎂🎁🎊🎈 Happy Birthday John! 🎈🎊🎁🎂
Many Happy Returns to John Goodman on his 68th Birthday!
I caught some of '10 Cloverfield Lane' the other evening and it's John at his acting best. I look forward to seeing it in its entirety.
Peak height - 6ft2 and now - 6ft1. 😁👍
🎂🎁🎊🎈🎂🎁🎉🎈🎂🎁🎊🎈🎂🎁🎉🎈
🎂🎁🎊🎈 Happy Birthday John! 🎈🎊🎁🎂
Many Happy Returns to John Goodman on his 68th Birthday!
I caught some of '10 Cloverfield Lane' the other evening and it's John at his acting best. I look forward to seeing it in its entirety.
Peak height - 6ft2 and now - 6ft1. 😁👍
🎂🎁🎊🎈🎂🎁🎉🎈🎂🎁🎊🎈🎂🎁🎉🎈
Danimal 176.7cm said on 18/Jun/20
John has lost a lot of height over the years. Not sure what has happened to him, but he was at least 6'2" if not 6'3" in his prime. Today he is struggling with a flat 6'0".
Here he is with 6'1" Dan Aykroyd over 20 years ago: Click Here
Here he is with 6'1" Dan Aykroyd (who has probably lost height himself) last year: Click Here
John has lost a lot of height over the years. Not sure what has happened to him, but he was at least 6'2" if not 6'3" in his prime. Today he is struggling with a flat 6'0".
Here he is with 6'1" Dan Aykroyd over 20 years ago: Click Here
Here he is with 6'1" Dan Aykroyd (who has probably lost height himself) last year: Click Here
Jkiller said on 29/May/20
Peak height was 187cm, nowadays 185cm
Peak height was 187cm, nowadays 185cm
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 28/May/20
300lb peak. He was down to 200 now. Hope he drop to a stable 175 would look great for him at 6'1.
300lb peak. He was down to 200 now. Hope he drop to a stable 175 would look great for him at 6'1.
Roots4828 said on 18/May/20
Doesn’t hold up well next to Affleck. He must have lost a lot of height.
Doesn’t hold up well next to Affleck. He must have lost a lot of height.
6'4 1/2" leperchaun said on 30/Apr/20
Peak height 6'1"
Current height 5'11 3/4"
Seemed quite tall in all movies.
Peak height 6'1"
Current height 5'11 3/4"
Seemed quite tall in all movies.
mark thompson said on 14/Feb/20
i'd give him 6'2 flat. looks it in the big lebowski next to jeff bridges who i'd say looks 6'1 maximum and steve buscemi who i'd give 5'8.5, so 6'2, give or take, seems reasonable.
i'd give him 6'2 flat. looks it in the big lebowski next to jeff bridges who i'd say looks 6'1 maximum and steve buscemi who i'd give 5'8.5, so 6'2, give or take, seems reasonable.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 4/Aug/19
3cm lost is the max i buy that for Goodman, but he holds well at 6'2 peak and 185cm now.
3cm lost is the max i buy that for Goodman, but he holds well at 6'2 peak and 185cm now.
Yang (5 footer 8, 172-173) said on 28/Jul/19
Peak height : 6ft 1 and half (186.5cm)
Current as of 2019 : 6 footer half (184cm)..
Peak height : 6ft 1 and half (186.5cm)
Current as of 2019 : 6 footer half (184cm)..
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Jun/19
A little over 6ft2 in the 80’s-90’s
A little over 6ft2 in the 80’s-90’s
Mister lennon said on 25/Apr/19
Solid 6'2 peak.
Flat 6'1 now.
Solid 6'2 peak.
Flat 6'1 now.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 22/Apr/19
Berta, I think peak he’d measure pretty close to Affleck
Berta, I think peak he’d measure pretty close to Affleck
berta said on 6/Dec/18
Rob shouldnt he be downgraded with atleast 1/4 today? i dont think he is legit 6 foot 1 anymore. Keep in mind that BIll murray was a fraction taller than him a couple years back. And bill is probably at best 6 ffot 1 today with a peak of legit 186. Also 188-189 ben affleck had him by 3,5 cm back in 2012. That means he was 185 cm 6 years back. And if we look back 15 years then he still looked like a 188 guy. What im trying to say is if he lost maybe 3 cm from 2002-2012, then he must have lost atleast 1 cm now when he really is in that age where people start losing height. 188 peak 184 today.
Rob shouldnt he be downgraded with atleast 1/4 today? i dont think he is legit 6 foot 1 anymore. Keep in mind that BIll murray was a fraction taller than him a couple years back. And bill is probably at best 6 ffot 1 today with a peak of legit 186. Also 188-189 ben affleck had him by 3,5 cm back in 2012. That means he was 185 cm 6 years back. And if we look back 15 years then he still looked like a 188 guy. What im trying to say is if he lost maybe 3 cm from 2002-2012, then he must have lost atleast 1 cm now when he really is in that age where people start losing height. 188 peak 184 today.
Rising - 174 cm said on 5/Oct/18
He looked like a mountain next to Al Pacino in Sea of Love. I know it's questionable whether Al was even 5'6", but the height difference alone was striking in all of their scenes together, much less the overall size difference. Keep in mind Goodman often slouched in the film, but an 8" difference is definitely believable in wide shots. That's part of why I had always thought he was taller than 6'2" with the other reason being how he looked cast alongside Roseanne. He hasn't looked nearly as tall for quite a few years now and obviously only some of that is posture.
He looked like a mountain next to Al Pacino in Sea of Love. I know it's questionable whether Al was even 5'6", but the height difference alone was striking in all of their scenes together, much less the overall size difference. Keep in mind Goodman often slouched in the film, but an 8" difference is definitely believable in wide shots. That's part of why I had always thought he was taller than 6'2" with the other reason being how he looked cast alongside Roseanne. He hasn't looked nearly as tall for quite a few years now and obviously only some of that is posture.
berta said on 18/May/18
188 peak and 184 today he looks mutch shorter these day there is atleast 1 inch lost
188 peak and 184 today he looks mutch shorter these day there is atleast 1 inch lost
Canson said on 10/Dec/17
You all need to realize that a 6’0.5 barefoot guy passes for 6’2” or can claim it and no one will question if it’s in shoes. I know someone 6’2.5 that claims 6’4” and while many do they don’t say it to his face but when they do he denies it. It takes actually pulling a tape measure on him which I may do one day lol
You all need to realize that a 6’0.5 barefoot guy passes for 6’2” or can claim it and no one will question if it’s in shoes. I know someone 6’2.5 that claims 6’4” and while many do they don’t say it to his face but when they do he denies it. It takes actually pulling a tape measure on him which I may do one day lol
Sasha said on 10/Dec/17
In "The Big Lebowski" he looked at least 2 inches taller, than Jeff Bridges. So I would put 6'3" for him.
In "The Big Lebowski" he looked at least 2 inches taller, than Jeff Bridges. So I would put 6'3" for him.
Jtm said on 28/Nov/17
Not sure about now but was a legit 6'2 in his younger days. Much taller than john turturro in Barton fink. Turturro is listed 6'0 here but I think he's closer to 5'11.
Not sure about now but was a legit 6'2 in his younger days. Much taller than john turturro in Barton fink. Turturro is listed 6'0 here but I think he's closer to 5'11.
movieguy said on 26/Nov/17
As to the poster doubting John was measured wrong I've got a cousin who is about 6'2'' and he got measured at a works physical as 5'11''. He told the lady doing the physical he was taller but she told him he wasn't. I know my heights I'm not a guy who mistakes 5'10'' for 6ft as some do. So errors can happen with these things. How I don't know.
As to the poster doubting John was measured wrong I've got a cousin who is about 6'2'' and he got measured at a works physical as 5'11''. He told the lady doing the physical he was taller but she told him he wasn't. I know my heights I'm not a guy who mistakes 5'10'' for 6ft as some do. So errors can happen with these things. How I don't know.
Jordan87 said on 22/Nov/17
Jman,
Will we find you in the same Asylum as Charlie ? I think guys like you try to shave 4" off other people's heights to make up for smaller parts of your Own Anatomy and I am not talking about height.
Jman,
Will we find you in the same Asylum as Charlie ? I think guys like you try to shave 4" off other people's heights to make up for smaller parts of your Own Anatomy and I am not talking about height.
Anonymous said on 16/Nov/17
I've read several 6'3" claims for him during his Roseanne days. He used to average between 280 and 335 pounds while on Roseanne. He was reported to have gone up to 400-450 pounds at his heaviest in the late 2000's and that is what I believe made him have a steeper height loss than the average male of his age. He was bare minimum 6'2" during his prime and could have been close to 6'3, but today at 65 years old and very thin, he's max 6'1" imo and could as low as 6'0".
I've read several 6'3" claims for him during his Roseanne days. He used to average between 280 and 335 pounds while on Roseanne. He was reported to have gone up to 400-450 pounds at his heaviest in the late 2000's and that is what I believe made him have a steeper height loss than the average male of his age. He was bare minimum 6'2" during his prime and could have been close to 6'3, but today at 65 years old and very thin, he's max 6'1" imo and could as low as 6'0".
Sam said on 15/Nov/17
LOL, crackpot alert. I've seen Goodman in person, albeit on a stage not equal footing, about 8 years ago with all the other main actors for the Big Lebowski next to a big 6'4" guy like T Bone Burnett and he still looked 6'0.5" with bad posture, very similar to Jeff Bridges and John Turturro up there.
LOL, crackpot alert. I've seen Goodman in person, albeit on a stage not equal footing, about 8 years ago with all the other main actors for the Big Lebowski next to a big 6'4" guy like T Bone Burnett and he still looked 6'0.5" with bad posture, very similar to Jeff Bridges and John Turturro up there.
Jman said on 14/Nov/17
Charlie, below, is right. I'm 6-foot even myself. I saw John Goodman walking into a Delta airlines lounge in Atlanta about 13 years ago and he was significantly shorter than me. I'd say 5'9" is about right.
Charlie, below, is right. I'm 6-foot even myself. I saw John Goodman walking into a Delta airlines lounge in Atlanta about 13 years ago and he was significantly shorter than me. I'd say 5'9" is about right.
Jordan87 said on 18/Oct/17
Charlie,
John Goodman at 5'9 is like an IQ of over 50 for you. It is just is not the case. ;)
Charlie,
John Goodman at 5'9 is like an IQ of over 50 for you. It is just is not the case. ;)
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Oct/17
Looks to be struggling with 6ft1 these days
Looks to be struggling with 6ft1 these days
Charlie said on 2/Sep/17
John Goodman is not that tall.He looked the same height perhaps a half inch taller than William Forsythe in Raising Arizona and William looks 5'8 standing beside Rob Paul.I own the Movie Raising Arizona and i have paused the movie where ever i seen the 3 guys standing side by side.3 guys meaning John Goodman, William Forsythe and Nicholas Cage. John Goodman is at most 5'9 today. It wouldn't surprise me non if he was 5'8 the same height as Rob Paul. You guys go watch Raising Arizona and tell me if i'm wrong or not. One scene in the movie shows the 3 of them laughing hysterically while Nicholas Cage slaps John Goodman on the cheek. The all looked the same height. If Rob was to take a photo with John Goodman i can almost put money on it that John is not more than 1 inch taller than Rob Paul. In the movie He looked at most 1 inch taller but through out the movie they looked pretty well close in height. John Goodman is at most 5'9 today or 5'8.5.
John Goodman is not that tall.He looked the same height perhaps a half inch taller than William Forsythe in Raising Arizona and William looks 5'8 standing beside Rob Paul.I own the Movie Raising Arizona and i have paused the movie where ever i seen the 3 guys standing side by side.3 guys meaning John Goodman, William Forsythe and Nicholas Cage. John Goodman is at most 5'9 today. It wouldn't surprise me non if he was 5'8 the same height as Rob Paul. You guys go watch Raising Arizona and tell me if i'm wrong or not. One scene in the movie shows the 3 of them laughing hysterically while Nicholas Cage slaps John Goodman on the cheek. The all looked the same height. If Rob was to take a photo with John Goodman i can almost put money on it that John is not more than 1 inch taller than Rob Paul. In the movie He looked at most 1 inch taller but through out the movie they looked pretty well close in height. John Goodman is at most 5'9 today or 5'8.5.
Jordan87 said on 19/Jul/17
I do belive he looked over 6 foot In his prime, but How can someone Under-measure another person by a whole 2". Something doesn't sound right with his statement.
I do belive he looked over 6 foot In his prime, but How can someone Under-measure another person by a whole 2". Something doesn't sound right with his statement.
Ben said on 16/Jul/17
Wow it seems to be very normal for people be measured lower or higher when they are taking their physical. What is going on.......?
I'm currently watching 10 Cloverfield Lane for the first time and he has a really bad posture
Wow it seems to be very normal for people be measured lower or higher when they are taking their physical. What is going on.......?
I'm currently watching 10 Cloverfield Lane for the first time and he has a really bad posture
Richardspain said on 15/Jul/17
To be honest I see a good 187/188 cm when he was young and today still in 184-185 cm zone.
He has always moved between 184-188cm zone not more but not less
Peak 187/188 cm
Nowadays 184cm
To be honest I see a good 187/188 cm when he was young and today still in 184-185 cm zone.
He has always moved between 184-188cm zone not more but not less
Peak 187/188 cm
Nowadays 184cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Jun/17
Looked 189-190cm in Roseanne.....
Looked 189-190cm in Roseanne.....
MJKoP said on 4/Jun/17
I actually think that his weight and mass make him appear taller than he really is, even though it usually has the opposite effect on others. I saw 6'4" listings online many years ago and always believed it back then.
I actually think that his weight and mass make him appear taller than he really is, even though it usually has the opposite effect on others. I saw 6'4" listings online many years ago and always believed it back then.
Canson said on 31/May/17
Hard to tell and I agree with Christian short legs and on the heavier side makes him appear shorter than he is
Hard to tell and I agree with Christian short legs and on the heavier side makes him appear shorter than he is
Christian-196.5cm (6ft5 3/8) said on 30/May/17
He appears to have very short legs, although it might be partly due to his blazer.
He appears to have very short legs, although it might be partly due to his blazer.
Anonymous said on 13/May/17
In the film Fallen (1998) John Goodman and Denzel Washington are talking to a linguist, there is a height marker on the wall and Goodman is roughly 74 inches. Definitely not at the 75 inch mark and the camera is filming low. He's in dress shoes so 6ft 1 flat maximum.
In the film Fallen (1998) John Goodman and Denzel Washington are talking to a linguist, there is a height marker on the wall and Goodman is roughly 74 inches. Definitely not at the 75 inch mark and the camera is filming low. He's in dress shoes so 6ft 1 flat maximum.
Sonnecker said on 5/May/17
Maybe 188 cm when he was younger, before 50 Year old... Nowaday I see him at 184 cm like his friend Jeff Bridges.
Maybe 188 cm when he was younger, before 50 Year old... Nowaday I see him at 184 cm like his friend Jeff Bridges.
Canson said on 27/Apr/17
Strong 6'1 peak
Strong 6'1 peak
berta said on 27/Apr/17
i think rob really need to look at him he is no taller than max 185 falt but that is to mutch more like 184 today i can promise chris pine would edge him out. although at his peak he could look atleast 188 and sometimes even 189. I dont think he was 189 but dont under 188. lost about 4 cm that is mutch for his age. about the same as arnold. But he have been overweight his whole life so it isnt that strange
i think rob really need to look at him he is no taller than max 185 falt but that is to mutch more like 184 today i can promise chris pine would edge him out. although at his peak he could look atleast 188 and sometimes even 189. I dont think he was 189 but dont under 188. lost about 4 cm that is mutch for his age. about the same as arnold. But he have been overweight his whole life so it isnt that strange
Richardspain said on 27/Apr/17
Nowadays he is a solid 185cm. With footwear maybe 188 cm. He is a big man
Nowadays he is a solid 185cm. With footwear maybe 188 cm. He is a big man
S.J.H said on 26/Apr/17
He look 182cm to me. But strange he lost alot height. He look 185-186cm peak
He look 182cm to me. But strange he lost alot height. He look 185-186cm peak
Ali said on 15/Apr/17
6ft max. 6'2 is ridiculous.
6ft max. 6'2 is ridiculous.
berta said on 12/Apr/17
rob maybe give him currnet listing at 184? looks max 184 in kong and affleck had 2 inches on him and bill murray looked 1-2 cm taller than him.
rob maybe give him currnet listing at 184? looks max 184 in kong and affleck had 2 inches on him and bill murray looked 1-2 cm taller than him.
berta said on 9/Apr/17
i saw kong skull island yesterday. He is not over 184 these days. could be just over 6 foot now i think
i saw kong skull island yesterday. He is not over 184 these days. could be just over 6 foot now i think
SonnyboySlim said on 22/Mar/17
Over the years, he's fluctuated between 250 and 350 but in Kong he looks almost svelte - well, 240ish. He also looks just over 6'.
Good actor though.
Over the years, he's fluctuated between 250 and 350 but in Kong he looks almost svelte - well, 240ish. He also looks just over 6'.
Good actor though.
Sandy Cowell said on 17/Mar/17
@ Grizz - Hello Grizz! I've just found your comment!
I haven't yet seen the film '10 Cloverfield Lane'! Now I'm not sure that I want to! 👍
Anyway, cheers! 🍻
@ Grizz - Hello Grizz! I've just found your comment!
I haven't yet seen the film '10 Cloverfield Lane'! Now I'm not sure that I want to! 👍
Anyway, cheers! 🍻
Sam said on 16/Mar/17
I'd say both his peak and current listings are accurate. I recall in the late 2000s he started a dramatic weight loss but I've noticed some pretty dramatic weight fluctuations. He looked like he went up and down at least 30 pounds a couple years ago and is looking somewhat slimmer again recently.
I'd say both his peak and current listings are accurate. I recall in the late 2000s he started a dramatic weight loss but I've noticed some pretty dramatic weight fluctuations. He looked like he went up and down at least 30 pounds a couple years ago and is looking somewhat slimmer again recently.
grizz said on 21/Feb/17
@Sandy,I'd hardly call him on healthy. His heavy breathing was so annoying in 10 Cloverfield Lane,even when he stood there absolutely still
@Sandy,I'd hardly call him on healthy. His heavy breathing was so annoying in 10 Cloverfield Lane,even when he stood there absolutely still
John said on 12/Jan/17
5ft11 nowadays. 6ft1 at peak.
5ft11 nowadays. 6ft1 at peak.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Dec/16
ROb, is a fraction over 6ft2 peak possible for Goodman?
Editor Rob
ROb, is a fraction over 6ft2 peak possible for Goodman?
Editor Rob Rampage, I'm happy with 6ft 2, but of course at times he could probably seem (in the 80's) a solid 6ft 2er.
Sandy Cowell said on 22/Nov/16
Interestingly, John Goodman doesn't look unhealthily overweight in the picture you have found for him Rob! He looks as though his stature can take the 20 plus stone that he claims to weigh. When I've seen him on screen, he didn't look anything but overweight, in a cuddlesome sort of way! This must be a very flattering picture, unless John has gone on a health kick, which of course, would be ideal for his health and wellbeing!
I do hope the picture is the result of the latter!
Editor Rob
Interestingly, John Goodman doesn't look unhealthily overweight in the picture you have found for him Rob! He looks as though his stature can take the 20 plus stone that he claims to weigh. When I've seen him on screen, he didn't look anything but overweight, in a cuddlesome sort of way! This must be a very flattering picture, unless John has gone on a health kick, which of course, would be ideal for his health and wellbeing!
I do hope the picture is the result of the latter!
Editor Rob Sandy, 30 years ago I remember thinking Goodman would be lucky to hit 50, but he's still going strong, still putting in great performances in films.
A true quality American actor, one of the best out there.
A true quality American actor, one of the best out there.
berta said on 21/Nov/16
he looked no shorter than 188 peak could have been a little over 6 fott 2 even but now he looks little over 6 feet. bill murray is taller theses days
he looked no shorter than 188 peak could have been a little over 6 fott 2 even but now he looks little over 6 feet. bill murray is taller theses days
finn andrews said on 15/Sep/16
yeah he did look tall in 10 cloverfield lane maybe half 6,1 and 6,2
yeah he did look tall in 10 cloverfield lane maybe half 6,1 and 6,2
john said on 31/Aug/16
I thought John Goodman looked huge in 10 Cloverfield Lane (not because of his weight). He looks like he's a bit over 6'2".
I thought John Goodman looked huge in 10 Cloverfield Lane (not because of his weight). He looks like he's a bit over 6'2".
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Aug/16
He looks like a big 6ft3 guy in those photos. Granted I'm not sure O'Toole was still quite a 6ft2 guy by that stage and is Michael O'Keeffe really 6ft1? Arnold and Aykroyd are/were both minimum that height though. I can believe 189cm range for Goodman at peak. He was a genuinely big and tall man
He looks like a big 6ft3 guy in those photos. Granted I'm not sure O'Toole was still quite a 6ft2 guy by that stage and is Michael O'Keeffe really 6ft1? Arnold and Aykroyd are/were both minimum that height though. I can believe 189cm range for Goodman at peak. He was a genuinely big and tall man
Canson said on 25/Jul/16
@Danimal: I agree with you. He did look 6'2 prime. I wasn't aware of the surgery. May explain why he lost height
@Danimal: I agree with you. He did look 6'2 prime. I wasn't aware of the surgery. May explain why he lost height
Danimal (176-178cm) said on 17/Jul/16
He was minimum 6'2" up until the late 90's.
Next to 6'2" Peter O'toole: Click Here & Click Here
Next to 6'1" Michael O'Keefe (from Roseanne): Click Here
Next to 5'11" James Belushi (in 1998): Click Here
Next to 6'1" Dan Aykroyd in 1998: Click Here
Next to 6'1"-6'2" Tom Arnold: Click Here
He was minimum 6'2" up until the late 90's.
Next to 6'2" Peter O'toole: Click Here & Click Here
Next to 6'1" Michael O'Keefe (from Roseanne): Click Here
Next to 5'11" James Belushi (in 1998): Click Here
Next to 6'1" Dan Aykroyd in 1998: Click Here
Next to 6'1"-6'2" Tom Arnold: Click Here
Danimal (176-178cm) said on 17/Jul/16
I believe John had a full hip surgery and appears to have lost significant height since the 80's/90's. I once read he was 6'3" during his college football days. He was bare minimum 6'2", but now that he is 64 years old and has consistently weighed over 300 pounds and at times as high as 400 pounds (according to himself) he appears to have lost height as a result and I wouldn't be surprised if he's as low as 6'0" today (6'1" MAX).
I believe John had a full hip surgery and appears to have lost significant height since the 80's/90's. I once read he was 6'3" during his college football days. He was bare minimum 6'2", but now that he is 64 years old and has consistently weighed over 300 pounds and at times as high as 400 pounds (according to himself) he appears to have lost height as a result and I wouldn't be surprised if he's as low as 6'0" today (6'1" MAX).
Canson said on 16/Jul/16
Kmart. Wow. I think I've heard it all now. The doctor's measuring scale is unreliable because it starts 2-3" off the ground?? Then I guess we all need to start going off what someone else around us say their height is.(be it far fetched that they are lying about their height). Makes no sense to even bother having someone who is probably certified and licensed as a doctor to practice medicine then. Oh btw, you also have posts in other sections at 20 or 21 saying you were 6'3. Hmm? Sounds like you still are and sounds like you are still wanting to be taller just like you were back then? Some things never change
Kmart. Wow. I think I've heard it all now. The doctor's measuring scale is unreliable because it starts 2-3" off the ground?? Then I guess we all need to start going off what someone else around us say their height is.(be it far fetched that they are lying about their height). Makes no sense to even bother having someone who is probably certified and licensed as a doctor to practice medicine then. Oh btw, you also have posts in other sections at 20 or 21 saying you were 6'3. Hmm? Sounds like you still are and sounds like you are still wanting to be taller just like you were back then? Some things never change
Canson said on 16/Jul/16
so since John Goodman says he was 6'2 he was 6'2? If that's the case then when Charles Barkley (who was actually measured 6'4 5/8) claims 6'4 3/4 why don't we believe him? It's funny how this site works. When someone claims they're taller than they are we believe it. But when someone claims their actual height "oh well he downplays himself". LOL
so since John Goodman says he was 6'2 he was 6'2? If that's the case then when Charles Barkley (who was actually measured 6'4 5/8) claims 6'4 3/4 why don't we believe him? It's funny how this site works. When someone claims they're taller than they are we believe it. But when someone claims their actual height "oh well he downplays himself". LOL
Canson said on 16/Jul/16
so since John Goodman says he was 6'2 he was 6'2? If that's the case then when Charles Barkley (who was actually measured 6'4 5/8) claims 6'4 3/4 why don't you believe him? It's funny how this site works. When someone claims they're taller than they are we believe it. But when someone claims their actual height "oh well he downplays himself". LOL
so since John Goodman says he was 6'2 he was 6'2? If that's the case then when Charles Barkley (who was actually measured 6'4 5/8) claims 6'4 3/4 why don't you believe him? It's funny how this site works. When someone claims they're taller than they are we believe it. But when someone claims their actual height "oh well he downplays himself". LOL
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Jul/16
Rob, how likely is 6ft today for Goodman?
Editor Rob
Rob, how likely is 6ft today for Goodman?
Editor Rob he could be heading that way in a few years.
Aravind said on 21/Apr/16
Wrong,I'm sure he's 5'11.
Wrong,I'm sure he's 5'11.
Sam said on 7/Apr/16
Rob, could you add 10 Cloverfield Lane as his 10th credit? A tremendous performance that elevates that film.
Notice the picture is from when he lost a lot of weight for a little while...too bad his weight went back if only for his health.
Rob, could you add 10 Cloverfield Lane as his 10th credit? A tremendous performance that elevates that film.
Notice the picture is from when he lost a lot of weight for a little while...too bad his weight went back if only for his health.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Apr/16
I think he can still hold 6ft1 range today. He looks 186-187cm in Cloverfield Lane
I think he can still hold 6ft1 range today. He looks 186-187cm in Cloverfield Lane
Len said on 26/Mar/16
Always looked 6'0" but very big-boned to me.
Always looked 6'0" but very big-boned to me.
Ajax said on 17/Mar/16
I got within a few feet of him at the premiere of Cloverfield Lane... he is definitely pushing 6ft 2in (perhaps a hair under). IMO 6ft 1 in is short-changing him.
I got within a few feet of him at the premiere of Cloverfield Lane... he is definitely pushing 6ft 2in (perhaps a hair under). IMO 6ft 1 in is short-changing him.
Arch Stanton said on 13/Mar/16
@Rob, can you add a photo, correct Baron to Barton and squeeze in The Babe?
@Rob, can you add a photo, correct Baron to Barton and squeeze in The Babe?
Sean said on 10/Mar/16
Funny that he thinks the military measured him wrong.
Funny that he thinks the military measured him wrong.
Q said on 2/Mar/16
Ran into him at a strip joint in East St. Louis one night. I'm 6'and he may have been an inch or so shorter. Huge head though, don,t know how he holds it up.
Ran into him at a strip joint in East St. Louis one night. I'm 6'and he may have been an inch or so shorter. Huge head though, don,t know how he holds it up.
That guy said on 26/Feb/16
Click Here
Rob, i think he is taller than 6ft1.5 Samuel L Jackson in this pic so i would give him 6 ft 3
Editor Rob
Click Here
Rob, i think he is taller than 6ft1.5 Samuel L Jackson in this pic so i would give him 6 ft 3
Editor Rob considering how much nearer John is, it can be hard to tell the true difference.
But in that photo John looks like he is shorter than Sam when taking account of the perspective.
But in that photo John looks like he is shorter than Sam when taking account of the perspective.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Jan/16
In Big Lebowski
John Goodman: 6ft2-6ft2½
Jeff Bridges: 6ft1½-6ft2
In Big Lebowski
John Goodman: 6ft2-6ft2½
Jeff Bridges: 6ft1½-6ft2
Sean73 said on 9/Oct/15
I would give John a solid 6'0.5", maybe 6'0.75" these days. He looks that next to a strong 6'1" Bill Murray in pic's from The Monuments Men. The last time Goodman was close to 6'2" was in The Big Lebowski.
I would give John a solid 6'0.5", maybe 6'0.75" these days. He looks that next to a strong 6'1" Bill Murray in pic's from The Monuments Men. The last time Goodman was close to 6'2" was in The Big Lebowski.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Sep/15
188-189cm peak
185cm today
188-189cm peak
185cm today
Celebheights 6'1.75/187 CM said on 20/Sep/15
Actually, I could buy 6'2 1/4". He probably was about the height as Ryan Reynolds currently is when he was younger.
Actually, I could buy 6'2 1/4". He probably was about the height as Ryan Reynolds currently is when he was younger.
Celebheights 6'1.75/187 CM said on 20/Sep/15
Hmm, he's a tough one to guess. I would say:
Peak: Anywhere from 6'1 1/2" to the full 6'2". He can appear shorter due to bad posture, and from his big build. I can't buy anything over 6'2" though.
Today: 6'0 1/2"
Hmm, he's a tough one to guess. I would say:
Peak: Anywhere from 6'1 1/2" to the full 6'2". He can appear shorter due to bad posture, and from his big build. I can't buy anything over 6'2" though.
Today: 6'0 1/2"
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Aug/15
Not under 6ft2 peak. The guy was big...
Not under 6ft2 peak. The guy was big...
msn187 said on 5/Aug/15
In 'The Big Lebowski' Jeff Bridges (6'1) is barefoot and still is a bit taller than Goodman in one certain shot I remember. Nothing over 6'1 to me. A strong sixfooter is more like it.
In 'The Big Lebowski' Jeff Bridges (6'1) is barefoot and still is a bit taller than Goodman in one certain shot I remember. Nothing over 6'1 to me. A strong sixfooter is more like it.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Jun/15
6ft0½-1 Today
6ft2-2½ Peak
6ft0½-1 Today
6ft2-2½ Peak
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Jun/15
Danimal says on 5/Mar/15
Saw 6'3" listings of him back in the day, but if he claims he was 6'2", then he was 6'2" (NOT less). Today, he looks to have dipped below 6'1".
You know he actually does look like he's dipping into 6ft territory. He probably still clears it but he might be 184cm now. He was definitely at least 6ft2 in Roseanne and The Big Lebowski...
Danimal says on 5/Mar/15
Saw 6'3" listings of him back in the day, but if he claims he was 6'2", then he was 6'2" (NOT less). Today, he looks to have dipped below 6'1".
You know he actually does look like he's dipping into 6ft territory. He probably still clears it but he might be 184cm now. He was definitely at least 6ft2 in Roseanne and The Big Lebowski...
Judd said on 21/May/15
as i said before, 6'1" for him is a nice gift.
i think he's more a strong 6' (6'0-0.5")...
as i said before, 6'1" for him is a nice gift.
i think he's more a strong 6' (6'0-0.5")...
Danimal said on 5/Mar/15
Saw 6'3" listings of him back in the day, but if he claims he was 6'2", then he was 6'2" (NOT less). Today, he looks to have dipped below 6'1".
Saw 6'3" listings of him back in the day, but if he claims he was 6'2", then he was 6'2" (NOT less). Today, he looks to have dipped below 6'1".
slothee said on 17/Feb/15
This listing is to high. He appears usually at least an inch shorter than strong 6'1" Bill Murray, and only slightly taller than Matt Damon and George Clooney. I think 5'11"-6'0" is probably his current height, and his peak was around 6'0" or 6'1". I doubt he was ever 6'2".
What do you think Rob? Could he be shorter than 6'1" nowadays?
This listing is to high. He appears usually at least an inch shorter than strong 6'1" Bill Murray, and only slightly taller than Matt Damon and George Clooney. I think 5'11"-6'0" is probably his current height, and his peak was around 6'0" or 6'1". I doubt he was ever 6'2".
What do you think Rob? Could he be shorter than 6'1" nowadays?
grizz said on 13/Feb/15
MrTBlack,it's possible,especially if it's an ancient and improperly calibrated instrument. They measured me at the age of 19 at 5ft11.5 (181.5), in the morning. They got it wrong by an inch. I'm 6ft0.75 out of bed and 5ft11.75in as my absolute low.
Even if I neglect that, the fact is that even at the age of 14 I got measured at 5ft11.75in.
So yes, mistakes are possible.
MrTBlack,it's possible,especially if it's an ancient and improperly calibrated instrument. They measured me at the age of 19 at 5ft11.5 (181.5), in the morning. They got it wrong by an inch. I'm 6ft0.75 out of bed and 5ft11.75in as my absolute low.
Even if I neglect that, the fact is that even at the age of 14 I got measured at 5ft11.75in.
So yes, mistakes are possible.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Jan/15
If Bridges was 6ft1-2 range in Big Lebowski then Goodman was 6ft2-3
If Bridges was 6ft1-2 range in Big Lebowski then Goodman was 6ft2-3
Arch Stanton said on 1/Jan/15
Barton Fink is one of my all time favourites!!
Barton Fink is one of my all time favourites!!
Sam said on 30/Dec/14
Not a fan of Barton Fink, Rob?
Not a fan of Barton Fink, Rob?
MrTBlack said on 26/Dec/14
My question is how can you be measured 2" shorter than you are on a stadiometer?
My question is how can you be measured 2" shorter than you are on a stadiometer?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Oct/14
Goodman is slouching and we don't know what kind of shoes Bradley is sporting.
Personally, I think both men are around 6ft1...the older and bigger of the two would have been at 1in taller 20+ years ago obviously.
Goodman is slouching and we don't know what kind of shoes Bradley is sporting.
Personally, I think both men are around 6ft1...the older and bigger of the two would have been at 1in taller 20+ years ago obviously.
Judd said on 24/Sep/14
If Bradley Cooper is an honest 6'0.5" (as rob said and i agree his listing) John Goodman has to be 6'0-0.5":
Click Here
If Bradley Cooper is an honest 6'0.5" (as rob said and i agree his listing) John Goodman has to be 6'0-0.5":
Click Here
Arch Stanton said on 16/Sep/14
Rob can you add Barton Fink, The Flintstones and Inside Llewyn Davis too? Barton Fink should be near the top I think, definitely one of the greatest films ever made, have you seen it?
Agreed with Save, peak I really don't think you can argue on shorter than 6 ft 2. He easily looked it in many comparisons. See him with Bridges in Lebowski and John Turturro in Barton Fink for instance.
Editor Rob
Rob can you add Barton Fink, The Flintstones and Inside Llewyn Davis too? Barton Fink should be near the top I think, definitely one of the greatest films ever made, have you seen it?
Agreed with Save, peak I really don't think you can argue on shorter than 6 ft 2. He easily looked it in many comparisons. See him with Bridges in Lebowski and John Turturro in Barton Fink for instance.
Editor Rob many years ago yes
judd said on 15/Sep/14
in flight he looks very close to Denzel Washington (5'11.75 today). I think he was 6'1-1.5" on a good day but his current height is 6'-6'0.5...
in flight he looks very close to Denzel Washington (5'11.75 today). I think he was 6'1-1.5" on a good day but his current height is 6'-6'0.5...
kmart said on 31/Aug/14
Same Deal With Me. I Had An Appointment. But They Measured Me 2 inches shorter than i am. they measured me at 6'3'' instead of 6'5''. Alot OF Times the height scale actually starts like 2-3 inches off the ground so you'll be measured like 2-3 inches shorter. i know i'm 6'5'' cause i stood next to a friend of mine whose 6'3'' and there was a noticeable difference
Same Deal With Me. I Had An Appointment. But They Measured Me 2 inches shorter than i am. they measured me at 6'3'' instead of 6'5''. Alot OF Times the height scale actually starts like 2-3 inches off the ground so you'll be measured like 2-3 inches shorter. i know i'm 6'5'' cause i stood next to a friend of mine whose 6'3'' and there was a noticeable difference
SaveUsY2J said on 7/Aug/14
@Wilton176: Have you even seen any of this guy's movies? Or any photographs of him whatsoever? There's not a chance in hell he was under 6'2 peak. If he was 6'0 then an overwhelming amount of heights on here are overlisted.
@Wilton176: Have you even seen any of this guy's movies? Or any photographs of him whatsoever? There's not a chance in hell he was under 6'2 peak. If he was 6'0 then an overwhelming amount of heights on here are overlisted.
Wilton176 said on 22/Apr/14
If he got measured at 6 foot, that's what he was. Seriously guys, it's a slim chance the army messed up the measurement that much. It's no good saying "oh, but he's the same height as X who also claims 6'2" or whatever - because the statistical fact is that MOST guys give an overstated height, especially celebrities.
Seriously it is sooo easy for a 6' guy to get away with 6'2. I see it in the real world all the time.
If he got measured at 6 foot, that's what he was. Seriously guys, it's a slim chance the army messed up the measurement that much. It's no good saying "oh, but he's the same height as X who also claims 6'2" or whatever - because the statistical fact is that MOST guys give an overstated height, especially celebrities.
Seriously it is sooo easy for a 6' guy to get away with 6'2. I see it in the real world all the time.
Lucien said on 14/Apr/14
Hi, i would like to answer to Martin who says that Goodman is taller than Bill Muray. I was at Monuments men's premiere in Paris, where the lead cast was present. I am 5'11 and John, standing at less than 4 meters away from me hardly looked above average, maybe 6 feet in bulky shoes! I was quite surprised, remembering him as a 6'2 guy!
Bill Muray on the other hand still manages to look like a strong 6'1.5
By the way Dujardin is close to 5'11 and Matt Damon is under 5'10 for sure, probably 5'9.5
Hi, i would like to answer to Martin who says that Goodman is taller than Bill Muray. I was at Monuments men's premiere in Paris, where the lead cast was present. I am 5'11 and John, standing at less than 4 meters away from me hardly looked above average, maybe 6 feet in bulky shoes! I was quite surprised, remembering him as a 6'2 guy!
Bill Muray on the other hand still manages to look like a strong 6'1.5
By the way Dujardin is close to 5'11 and Matt Damon is under 5'10 for sure, probably 5'9.5
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Mar/14
That's absurd, Jake. I do respect the Coen Brothers and I love their work. But remakes usually have horrific outcomes.
That's absurd, Jake. I do respect the Coen Brothers and I love their work. But remakes usually have horrific outcomes.
Martin said on 2/Mar/14
Goodman can't be 6' today. Just saw him on french TV, he was obviously taller than Bill Murray...
Goodman can't be 6' today. Just saw him on french TV, he was obviously taller than Bill Murray...
Arch Stanton said on 3/Feb/14
Definitely taller than Jeff Bridges in The Big Lebowski.
Definitely taller than Jeff Bridges in The Big Lebowski.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Jan/14
"Peak height was 6ft 2.5in (189cm)"
Easily looked that range in the 80s-90s. Nowadays his height is kinda hard to gauge. He can look barely 6ft at times and other times still near 6ft2. But, the 5ft11 talk for Bridges is garbage. He was still at least 3in taller than Matt Damon a few years ago in that horrible True Grit remake.
"Peak height was 6ft 2.5in (189cm)"
Easily looked that range in the 80s-90s. Nowadays his height is kinda hard to gauge. He can look barely 6ft at times and other times still near 6ft2. But, the 5ft11 talk for Bridges is garbage. He was still at least 3in taller than Matt Damon a few years ago in that horrible True Grit remake.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Jan/14
"Peak height was 6ft 2.5in 189cm)"
Easily looked that range in the 80s-90s. Nowadays his height is kinda hard to gauge. He can look barely 6ft at times and other times still near 6ft2. But, the 5ft11 talk for Bridges is garbage. He was still at least 3in taller than Matt Damon a few years ago in that horrible True Grit remake.
"Peak height was 6ft 2.5in 189cm)"
Easily looked that range in the 80s-90s. Nowadays his height is kinda hard to gauge. He can look barely 6ft at times and other times still near 6ft2. But, the 5ft11 talk for Bridges is garbage. He was still at least 3in taller than Matt Damon a few years ago in that horrible True Grit remake.
Arch Stanton said on 20/Jan/14
I thought Goodman looked near 6'1 in Inside Llewyn Davis.
I thought Goodman looked near 6'1 in Inside Llewyn Davis.
The Horse of FUNK said on 19/Jan/14
LOL @ 5'11" for Jeff Bridges.
LOL @ 5'11" for Jeff Bridges.
Gacy said on 18/Jan/14
Goodman is 6'0" nowadays, he looks 1 inch taller then 5'11" Jeff Bridges. Goodman never looked like he was 6'2".
Goodman is 6'0" nowadays, he looks 1 inch taller then 5'11" Jeff Bridges. Goodman never looked like he was 6'2".
Lenad said on 1/Jan/14
I saw at least 6'2 If not closer to 6'3 on roseanne
I saw at least 6'2 If not closer to 6'3 on roseanne
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Dec/13
189cm peak is a good shout. He did look a bit over 6ft2 in his Roseanne days and if Jeff Bridges was still 186-187cm in 1997 aged 48 while filming The Big Lebowski.
Silent D, I think he's gone up again. It's worrying considering how his good ol buddy Jim Gandolfini turned out. But then again he's made it past 60...
189cm peak is a good shout. He did look a bit over 6ft2 in his Roseanne days and if Jeff Bridges was still 186-187cm in 1997 aged 48 while filming The Big Lebowski.
Silent D, I think he's gone up again. It's worrying considering how his good ol buddy Jim Gandolfini turned out. But then again he's made it past 60...
Sam said on 3/Oct/13
Don't believe it...I've seen both Goodman and Bridges in person, though not on equal footing with myself. Both guys gave a 6'0"-6'1" impression and were clearly shorter than 6'4" T-Bone Burnett.
Don't believe it...I've seen both Goodman and Bridges in person, though not on equal footing with myself. Both guys gave a 6'0"-6'1" impression and were clearly shorter than 6'4" T-Bone Burnett.
Goose said on 30/Sep/13
Seen both Bridges and Goodman in person; good 6'3... Believe it.....
Seen both Bridges and Goodman in person; good 6'3... Believe it.....
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Sep/13
Gandolfini was only 51, Rob. I doubt he lost anything.
I'll admit that Goodman looked 184cm max with Affleck.
But with Denzel Washington in Flight looked 186-187cm
6ft1 today is still fair.
Gandolfini was only 51, Rob. I doubt he lost anything.
I'll admit that Goodman looked 184cm max with Affleck.
But with Denzel Washington in Flight looked 186-187cm
6ft1 today is still fair.
Jordan said on 5/Sep/13
Rob here is Goodman with Gandolfini. Both Look exactly the same height more or less. Gandolfini is pictured in a sopranos mug shot at 6'0.5 ( likely with his shoes on). I think Gando and Goodman are both 6 feet tall.
Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob here is Goodman with Gandolfini. Both Look exactly the same height more or less. Gandolfini is pictured in a sopranos mug shot at 6'0.5 ( likely with his shoes on). I think Gando and Goodman are both 6 feet tall.
Click Here
Editor Rob I think James was the kind of guy who lost a fraction in height by his latter years
cole said on 20/Aug/13
He looked like a tall man in his early films, 6'2 range. But these days he looks like a 6 footer, especially next to Ben Affleck. They don't measure wrong at a physical do they, so maybe he remembered being 6'2 and the thought of losing height just didn't accur to him. Accounting for his age alone, it's strange that he's lost this much height, but he is a big man, so it makes a bit more sense.
He looked like a tall man in his early films, 6'2 range. But these days he looks like a 6 footer, especially next to Ben Affleck. They don't measure wrong at a physical do they, so maybe he remembered being 6'2 and the thought of losing height just didn't accur to him. Accounting for his age alone, it's strange that he's lost this much height, but he is a big man, so it makes a bit more sense.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Aug/13
Peak height: 6ft2.25in/189cm
Current height: 6ft1.5in/187cm
I have a hard time believing he lost 1in+.
Peak height: 6ft2.25in/189cm
Current height: 6ft1.5in/187cm
I have a hard time believing he lost 1in+.
Lenad said on 15/Jul/13
looked every bit of 6'2 on roseanne
looked every bit of 6'2 on roseanne
Tee said on 20/Jun/13
He was pretty tall in his prime. Big guy, at least the size of the average football player. Towers over most people on Roseanne. Now he looks like he's lost a lot of height. Still a 6 footer possibly.
He was pretty tall in his prime. Big guy, at least the size of the average football player. Towers over most people on Roseanne. Now he looks like he's lost a lot of height. Still a 6 footer possibly.
BigUkrainianMike said on 12/Mar/13
At certain angles he looked like 6ft3 but I would say 6ft2 when he was younger now he is in his mid 60s or something so he might have shrunk a little so 6ft1 sounds about right
At certain angles he looked like 6ft3 but I would say 6ft2 when he was younger now he is in his mid 60s or something so he might have shrunk a little so 6ft1 sounds about right
James said on 22/Feb/13
6'2.5 peak and 6'1 today.
6'2.5 peak and 6'1 today.
Nick said on 20/Dec/12
He's barely taller than 5'10" Bryan Cranston in the few pics I've seen with them. 6'0" tops for Goodman.
He's barely taller than 5'10" Bryan Cranston in the few pics I've seen with them. 6'0" tops for Goodman.
Larry A said on 8/Dec/12
I saw him in the early 90's filming My Blue Heaven in my office building. DEFINITELY over 6'2'' at that time; probably closer to 6'3
I saw him in the early 90's filming My Blue Heaven in my office building. DEFINITELY over 6'2'' at that time; probably closer to 6'3
James said on 11/Nov/12
Looks 5'11 next too Ben afflick
Looks 5'11 next too Ben afflick
RobertJ said on 22/Oct/12
Not 6'1'' anymore. Here he is next to Ben Affleck recently who has at least an inch on him.
Click Here
Click Here
Not 6'1'' anymore. Here he is next to Ben Affleck recently who has at least an inch on him.
Click Here
Click Here
TNTinFL said on 28/Sep/12
I watched The Big Lebowski recently on Showtime and Goodman appeared to be a good 1-2 inches taller than Jeff Bridges. (Who I think is around 6'1.5") So I would have guessed him to be between 6'2.5" to 6'3".
I watched The Big Lebowski recently on Showtime and Goodman appeared to be a good 1-2 inches taller than Jeff Bridges. (Who I think is around 6'1.5") So I would have guessed him to be between 6'2.5" to 6'3".
Jason said on 17/Aug/12
Looks taller than Clint Eastwood in the previews I saw of him and Clint in a new movie coming out.
Looks taller than Clint Eastwood in the previews I saw of him and Clint in a new movie coming out.
SIlent d said on 25/Jan/12
He looks bigger than 185cm. 189cm maybe but 185cm nowadays is right.
He looks bigger than 185cm. 189cm maybe but 185cm nowadays is right.
Klint said on 14/Jan/12
He is 6'3 in "The borrowers".
Watch the ending, you'll see...
He is 6'3 in "The borrowers".
Watch the ending, you'll see...
Josh B said on 5/Jan/12
In the film True Stories his character states his height as 6'3
In the film True Stories his character states his height as 6'3
Some Guy said on 28/Dec/11
Same height as Ernie Hudson in "The Wrong Guys"
Same height as Ernie Hudson in "The Wrong Guys"
Jesse said on 10/Nov/11
Easily 6'2" barefoot in The Flintstones.Go watch that movie and see for yourself.He also was in fantastic shape for that movies,You can tell John was really lifting weights,John shows off his bulging rockhard 20" biceps in nearly every sence..
Easily 6'2" barefoot in The Flintstones.Go watch that movie and see for yourself.He also was in fantastic shape for that movies,You can tell John was really lifting weights,John shows off his bulging rockhard 20" biceps in nearly every sence..
Danimal said on 26/Oct/11
Peak, he was 6'2"/6'3". Maybe 6'2.5" is fair to say. Today, looks to have dropped an inch at 60 and having weighed 400 pounds a times did a # on him.
Peak, he was 6'2"/6'3". Maybe 6'2.5" is fair to say. Today, looks to have dropped an inch at 60 and having weighed 400 pounds a times did a # on him.
Martyr said on 25/Oct/11
@LAN Jiao
Peak was CLEARLY not 6'1 but close to 6'3
I agree with Rampage and think he still looked this in The Big Lebowski (was not that overweight in this great flick).
Looks like a weak 6'1 since he lost weight...
@LAN Jiao
Peak was CLEARLY not 6'1 but close to 6'3
I agree with Rampage and think he still looked this in The Big Lebowski (was not that overweight in this great flick).
Looks like a weak 6'1 since he lost weight...
LAN Jiao said on 17/Oct/11
He look 6'0.5 at best. Peak 6'1never 6'2. So he is 6'0.25 now
He look 6'0.5 at best. Peak 6'1never 6'2. So he is 6'0.25 now
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Oct/11
Looked 6"3(191cm) in Big Lebowski if Jeff Bridges was still near 6"2?
Looked 6"3(191cm) in Big Lebowski if Jeff Bridges was still near 6"2?
James said on 1/Oct/11
he's lost quite a bit off height already. i think 188 or 189cm peak is accurate.
rampage he looks the same height as jeff bridges so goodman is still near 6'1.
he's lost quite a bit off height already. i think 188 or 189cm peak is accurate.
rampage he looks the same height as jeff bridges so goodman is still near 6'1.
Legend said on 7/Sep/11
He really could have lost a bit of height. Looks 5'11.75 today? I thought more but I guess not. He was definitely 6'2 at one point.
He really could have lost a bit of height. Looks 5'11.75 today? I thought more but I guess not. He was definitely 6'2 at one point.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Sep/11
Rob, is there any possibility that Goodman may even may even be heading towards 6"0? because in this pic with 6"1(185cm) Jeff Bridges he's looking 1in shorter Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob, is there any possibility that Goodman may even may even be heading towards 6"0? because in this pic with 6"1(185cm) Jeff Bridges he's looking 1in shorter Click Here
Editor Rob he can look 6 feet, but is he a guy that might be able to squeeze more when measured?
Eli said on 13/Aug/11
he is 2-3 good inches shorter than 6-1 listed(here)garrett hedlund on death sentence
he is 2-3 good inches shorter than 6-1 listed(here)garrett hedlund on death sentence
jake said on 20/Jul/11
6ft2.5 peak, 6ft1.5 now.
6ft2.5 peak, 6ft1.5 now.
Legend said on 28/Jun/11
He was 6'2.75 peak
He's 6'1 now
He was 6'2.75 peak
He's 6'1 now
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Jun/11
He was between 6ft2 and 6ft3 back in the day.
He was between 6ft2 and 6ft3 back in the day.
John Badman said on 24/Jun/11
This guy was really lucky to have skip Nam, which makes it the more hillarious his Walter character in the Lebowski film.
This guy was really lucky to have skip Nam, which makes it the more hillarious his Walter character in the Lebowski film.
Jonas said on 20/Jun/11
I'd say 6'1 tops now
Same posture as Fox and at least an inch shorter: Click Here
I'd say 6'1 tops now
Same posture as Fox and at least an inch shorter: Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Jun/11
6ft2.25 peak
6ft1.5 now
6ft2.25 peak
6ft1.5 now
Lenad said on 15/Jun/11
He sure as hell looked more than 6'1 on Roseanne. More like 6'3. But hes probably more 6'1 now
He sure as hell looked more than 6'1 on Roseanne. More like 6'3. But hes probably more 6'1 now
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/May/11
He looked 189cm in The Big Lebowski next to 186-187cm Jeff Bridges
He looked 189cm in The Big Lebowski next to 186-187cm Jeff Bridges
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Apr/11
187.5cm(6"1.75) today
189cm(6"2.5) peak
187.5cm(6"1.75) today
189cm(6"2.5) peak
James said on 24/Apr/11
did not look over 6'1 in Coyote Ugly.
did not look over 6'1 in Coyote Ugly.
Lenad said on 24/Apr/11
I'd say 187cm min and 189cm max in his prime. Today 185-186cm
I'd say 187cm min and 189cm max in his prime. Today 185-186cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Apr/11
Rob could he still measure over 6"1?
Rob could he still measure over 6"1?
HollywoodFan said on 8/Apr/11
Saw him in Brooklyn about a month ago where he was filming an episode of "Damages" and he was an inch taller than myself (I'm about 6'1"); he was wearing extremely thin soled (almost slippers like) sneakers, standing at least 6'2". Still a big guy.
Saw him in Brooklyn about a month ago where he was filming an episode of "Damages" and he was an inch taller than myself (I'm about 6'1"); he was wearing extremely thin soled (almost slippers like) sneakers, standing at least 6'2". Still a big guy.
Legend said on 7/Apr/11
No way he's only 6'1, even now he's 6'1.5, 6'2.25 peak...
No way he's only 6'1, even now he's 6'1.5, 6'2.25 peak...
Been There Done That said on 28/Mar/11
Just for everyone's info you lose about a .25 in height for every 20lbs overweight you become.
Even if you regain you're ideal weight again, you usually only regain 75% of the height you lost due to disc and joint compression from the obesity.
Just for everyone's info you lose about a .25 in height for every 20lbs overweight you become.
Even if you regain you're ideal weight again, you usually only regain 75% of the height you lost due to disc and joint compression from the obesity.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Mar/11
6"1.5(187cm) now
6"2.25(189cm) peak
6"1.5(187cm) now
6"2.25(189cm) peak
T.J. said on 23/Feb/11
6'2" in the Roseanne days
6ft now
6'2" in the Roseanne days
6ft now
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 22/Jan/11
186-187cm today
186-187cm today
Lenad said on 17/Jan/11
definitly 6'2 range on Roseanne
definitly 6'2 range on Roseanne
Lenad said on 17/Jan/11
In Coyote Ugly he looked 6'1 range like 186cm but on Roseanne he looked a strong 6'2 like 189cm
In Coyote Ugly he looked 6'1 range like 186cm but on Roseanne he looked a strong 6'2 like 189cm
Rien said on 10/Jan/11
@ Editor Rob. You are right. I forgot he is old enough to have been in the Vietnam War. I see what he means now. The Draft did end in 1973 and he would have been in his 20's at that time.
@ Editor Rob. You are right. I forgot he is old enough to have been in the Vietnam War. I see what he means now. The Draft did end in 1973 and he would have been in his 20's at that time.
Rien said on 10/Jan/11
Rob the quote that you put up, what draft is he talking about? Also, do you think he has shrunk to 6feet even? I sort of doubt that. What do you think?
Editor Rob
Rob the quote that you put up, what draft is he talking about? Also, do you think he has shrunk to 6feet even? I sort of doubt that. What do you think?
Editor Rob it's got to be the nam draft? That draft was finished in 73?
T.J. said on 1/Jan/11
looks like a weak 6' next to Jimmy Fallon
looks like a weak 6' next to Jimmy Fallon
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Dec/10
6"1.25 or 6"1.5 now...Rob?
6"1.25 or 6"1.5 now...Rob?
Lenad said on 28/Nov/10
6'1 range now (186cm?) and 6'2-ish back then
6'1 range now (186cm?) and 6'2-ish back then
Anonymous said on 11/Nov/10
Do you know how tall you are
Do you know how tall you are
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Nov/10
He looked 6"1-6"2 in Coyote Ugly.
He looked 6"1-6"2 in Coyote Ugly.
James said on 9/Nov/10
Looked 6'1.5 or 6'2 in Big Lebowski
Looked 6'1.5 or 6'2 in Big Lebowski
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Nov/10
In The Big Lebowski he looked 6"2.5(189cm) for sure.
In Coyote Ugly more like 186-187cm...he's probably around that today.
In The Big Lebowski he looked 6"2.5(189cm) for sure.
In Coyote Ugly more like 186-187cm...he's probably around that today.
James said on 7/Nov/10
Well he certiainly did not look 6'2.5 in Coyote Ugly.
Well he certiainly did not look 6'2.5 in Coyote Ugly.
Legend said on 1/Nov/10
I think 6'2.25 peak, and now probably 6'1.25 range
I think 6'2.25 peak, and now probably 6'1.25 range
Anonymous said on 7/Jul/09
Maybe 6 feet 2.5 inches peak, 6 feet 1 or so now... looked definitely over an inch taller than Tom Arnold on Roseanne!
Maybe 6 feet 2.5 inches peak, 6 feet 1 or so now... looked definitely over an inch taller than Tom Arnold on Roseanne!
Hugh 191cm said on 6/Jul/09
185cm is too low for today. More 187cm. In fact he may still be 6ft2 for all we know. 6ft2.5 looked
Beleivable when watching the Big Lebowski.
185cm is too low for today. More 187cm. In fact he may still be 6ft2 for all we know. 6ft2.5 looked
Beleivable when watching the Big Lebowski.
Hugh 191cm said on 6/Jul/09
What rob should at least do is give him a really strong 6ft1 like
186cm or maybe even 187cm. He may still be 6ft2. 6ft1 flat is too low.
What rob should at least do is give him a really strong 6ft1 like
186cm or maybe even 187cm. He may still be 6ft2. 6ft1 flat is too low.
jaked said on 20/Jun/09
yes definitely agree with 6' 1 today. He was the same height as Paul Dano in recent photo.
yes definitely agree with 6' 1 today. He was the same height as Paul Dano in recent photo.
James said on 18/Jun/09
6'3 does seem a bit extreme for John Goodman. The most he could have been is 6'2.5.
6'3 does seem a bit extreme for John Goodman. The most he could have been is 6'2.5.
Danimal said on 4/Jun/09
His college football listing was 6'3" and 280-285 pounds. In later years (Roseanne) he was a about 6'2" and 305-335 pounds. Today looks to be no more than 6'1" and around 400 pounds.
His college football listing was 6'3" and 280-285 pounds. In later years (Roseanne) he was a about 6'2" and 305-335 pounds. Today looks to be no more than 6'1" and around 400 pounds.
Hugh 190cm said on 3/Jun/09
D. Ray Morton, Why do you think John's not a nice guy?
D. Ray Morton, Why do you think John's not a nice guy?
Hugh 190cm said on 3/Jun/09
Did not look under 6ft2 in the Big Lebowski.
Did not look under 6ft2 in the Big Lebowski.
Lenad said on 1/Jun/09
Anything under 6ft1, let alone today is ridiculos. The man looked a solid 6'2 on Roseanne like 188-189cm. The lowest I can accept for Goodman in his younger days is 187cm and he still could be that height and what gives a 6ft1ish image is poor posture and weight.
Anything under 6ft1, let alone today is ridiculos. The man looked a solid 6'2 on Roseanne like 188-189cm. The lowest I can accept for Goodman in his younger days is 187cm and he still could be that height and what gives a 6ft1ish image is poor posture and weight.
D. Ray Morton said on 12/May/09
6'1" and not nice.
6'1" and not nice.
Chris said on 5/May/09
No need to compare him to others in movie scenes. I'm not lying. I've met the guy multiple times, very nice guy. He is 6'1" and as thick as everyone thinks.
No need to compare him to others in movie scenes. I'm not lying. I've met the guy multiple times, very nice guy. He is 6'1" and as thick as everyone thinks.
Cmomo said on 3/May/09
Jeff Bridges states his height as 6'2 and in The Fisher King he does look 6'2 but in the Big Lebowski Goodman looks an inch or so taller. The Dude slouches throughout the film and walter stands tall but Goodman still looks an inch taller.
Jeff Bridges states his height as 6'2 and in The Fisher King he does look 6'2 but in the Big Lebowski Goodman looks an inch or so taller. The Dude slouches throughout the film and walter stands tall but Goodman still looks an inch taller.
Anonymous said on 30/Apr/09
Goodman still looks a solid 6ft2.
Goodman still looks a solid 6ft2.
Lenad said on 26/Apr/09
Looked 6ft2ish to me. Hell it would'nt surprise me if he still is 6ft2ish. His weight and posture could be what gives a 6ft1ish image
Looked 6ft2ish to me. Hell it would'nt surprise me if he still is 6ft2ish. His weight and posture could be what gives a 6ft1ish image
Lenad said on 24/Apr/09
And Hugh exagerates and says 6ft3
And Hugh exagerates and says 6ft3
Lenad said on 19/Apr/09
He looked a strong 6'2 in his younger days. His weight and bad posture might give a 6ft1ish illusion. Thats my opinion anyway
He looked a strong 6'2 in his younger days. His weight and bad posture might give a 6ft1ish illusion. Thats my opinion anyway
Hugh2 said on 20/Mar/09
Goodman is still 6ft2 and was closer to 6ft3 in his prime.
Goodman is still 6ft2 and was closer to 6ft3 in his prime.
Chris said on 16/Mar/09
Run into John Goodman multiple times in New Orleans. He is 6'1" but a very thick guy.
Run into John Goodman multiple times in New Orleans. He is 6'1" but a very thick guy.
LOL said on 1/Mar/09
6'3"-6'2.5" peak, nowdays 6'1"
6'3"-6'2.5" peak, nowdays 6'1"
\-_-_-(Hugh)-_-_-// said on 23/Feb/09
Still 6ft2. 6ft2.5 peak maybe?
Still 6ft2. 6ft2.5 peak maybe?
Anonymous said on 5/Feb/09
He played the Babe in that movie. But I guess was an inch taller.
He played the Babe in that movie. But I guess was an inch taller.
T.J. said on 28/Jan/09
was easily a strong 6'2, but I don't think you should have downgraded him rob.
was easily a strong 6'2, but I don't think you should have downgraded him rob.
Hugh said on 5/Jan/09
Rob no offense but downgrading John was pretty stupid.
Rob no offense but downgrading John was pretty stupid.
Jamie said on 4/Jan/09
Thats not right 6ft1 no way he is a very very strong 6ft2
Thats not right 6ft1 no way he is a very very strong 6ft2
T.J. said on 29/Dec/08
does seem to tower over everyone is his movies.
the only movie he does not look that tall in is Revenge Of The Nerds. He looks more 5'10ish in that movie, but probably because he was skinnier, but i'd definatly say he peaked 6'2
does seem to tower over everyone is his movies.
the only movie he does not look that tall in is Revenge Of The Nerds. He looks more 5'10ish in that movie, but probably because he was skinnier, but i'd definatly say he peaked 6'2
adam said on 21/Dec/08
In "The Flinstones" he looked very large and very build! His arms, chest, shoulders, whole body was huge and very strapping. Nowadays he is still huge but very fat too. Close 6-3 peak, nowadays very probably at least an inch less, perharps two.
In "The Flinstones" he looked very large and very build! His arms, chest, shoulders, whole body was huge and very strapping. Nowadays he is still huge but very fat too. Close 6-3 peak, nowadays very probably at least an inch less, perharps two.
Hugh said on 7/Dec/08
K mart is 100 percent correct. He can't be less than 6ft2. Even nowadays. I'd say he was closer to 6ft3 at his peak.
K mart is 100 percent correct. He can't be less than 6ft2. Even nowadays. I'd say he was closer to 6ft3 at his peak.
k mart said on 6/Dec/08
wait a minute.... john at 6ft 1in... impossible i think he is a sold 6ft 2in
wait a minute.... john at 6ft 1in... impossible i think he is a sold 6ft 2in
adam said on 26/Nov/08
Easily 6-2 peak, definitely yes.
Easily 6-2 peak, definitely yes.
Hugh said on 23/Nov/08
Whoah! hold it. You've downgraded John. Are you mad.
Whoah! hold it. You've downgraded John. Are you mad.
Hugh said on 23/Nov/08
His large proportioned figure made him look shorter. 6ft2-6ft2.5 is my guess.
His large proportioned figure made him look shorter. 6ft2-6ft2.5 is my guess.
kmart said on 19/Nov/08
john is tall and suave and is a good looking guy... i cannot see him any shorter than 6ft 2in... he is too young to lose any height
john is tall and suave and is a good looking guy... i cannot see him any shorter than 6ft 2in... he is too young to lose any height
Jasper said on 19/Sep/08
I ran into him at a restaurant several years back, he's several inches taller than my 5'10".
I'm going to say 6'2"-3". It's the width that throws off a lot of people's guesses. I have a co-worker of a similar build claiming 6'5" (I can look directly at his chin), and I'm sure he's got almost 2" on John (I think I was looking nose level).
Don't know about what Bear says about how hung, but a few of those Flintstones publicity shots and John's sporting a sundial that is NOT on his arm, there! Look for the one with him leaning on the mailbox for an example. Maybe his girth is hiding/overshadowing it the rest of the time and/or he's really a grower? He had to be doubling up underwear in the "Everybody's All-American" hotel party scene. Probably the best place to compare his height, as he's down to boxers.
There are also some recent "Speed Racer" cast publicity shots to compare his slimmer build to Susan Sarandon, Matthew Fox, and Emile Hirsch.
(and you can start a drinking game with his weight fluctuations in that movie!)
I ran into him at a restaurant several years back, he's several inches taller than my 5'10".
I'm going to say 6'2"-3". It's the width that throws off a lot of people's guesses. I have a co-worker of a similar build claiming 6'5" (I can look directly at his chin), and I'm sure he's got almost 2" on John (I think I was looking nose level).
Don't know about what Bear says about how hung, but a few of those Flintstones publicity shots and John's sporting a sundial that is NOT on his arm, there! Look for the one with him leaning on the mailbox for an example. Maybe his girth is hiding/overshadowing it the rest of the time and/or he's really a grower? He had to be doubling up underwear in the "Everybody's All-American" hotel party scene. Probably the best place to compare his height, as he's down to boxers.
There are also some recent "Speed Racer" cast publicity shots to compare his slimmer build to Susan Sarandon, Matthew Fox, and Emile Hirsch.
(and you can start a drinking game with his weight fluctuations in that movie!)
Atoadaso said on 5/Jul/08
He looked huge on Roseanne. I always thought he was around 6'4"-6'6" because of that show. He just towered over everybody. I can't see him below 6'2" though.
He looked huge on Roseanne. I always thought he was around 6'4"-6'6" because of that show. He just towered over everybody. I can't see him below 6'2" though.
Luis said on 27/Jun/08
6'2 seems right to me. In the Big Lebowsky he is taller than Jeff bridges, and Jeff is 6'1. How can he be 5'10? Being a big/fat guy, he may mislead anyone to think he is shorter because of the posture, that is it
6'2 seems right to me. In the Big Lebowsky he is taller than Jeff bridges, and Jeff is 6'1. How can he be 5'10? Being a big/fat guy, he may mislead anyone to think he is shorter because of the posture, that is it
Anonymous said on 3/Jun/08
he look 5'10 next glenn in this posture but he look today between 5'11 and 6 feet tall.
he look 5'10 next glenn in this posture but he look today between 5'11 and 6 feet tall.
Hugh said on 24/Apr/08
S4M, Do know anything about height. 5ft11 LOL!. Danimal, I think he was born yesterday. Anyway Goodman may have been a strong 6ft2 in his prime.
S4M, Do know anything about height. 5ft11 LOL!. Danimal, I think he was born yesterday. Anyway Goodman may have been a strong 6ft2 in his prime.
Viper said on 8/Apr/08
He looked blatantly 6-2 on Roseanne. People estimating to be real low from the picture must have not seen him in any movies or tv shows, which is hard to beleive.
He looked blatantly 6-2 on Roseanne. People estimating to be real low from the picture must have not seen him in any movies or tv shows, which is hard to beleive.
Danimal said on 7/Apr/08
Not that I need being backed up on this one, but thanks anyways Viper :)
Not that I need being backed up on this one, but thanks anyways Viper :)
Viper said on 7/Apr/08
LOL at Goodman being 5-11 at peak. He looks 6-2 in all of the pics Danimal linked.
LOL at Goodman being 5-11 at peak. He looks 6-2 in all of the pics Danimal linked.
glenn said on 4/Apr/08
the picture is used for myself.height comparison is a bonus for you guys.
the picture is used for myself.height comparison is a bonus for you guys.
stoo said on 3/Apr/08
He maybe looks just 6ft here. Been reading through the posts. How can people be saying his posture is "horrendous"etc in this picture. Nobody whips into a military straight posture for a picture, especially when they are aware the picture will be used for later height comparison. Give the guy a break
He maybe looks just 6ft here. Been reading through the posts. How can people be saying his posture is "horrendous"etc in this picture. Nobody whips into a military straight posture for a picture, especially when they are aware the picture will be used for later height comparison. Give the guy a break
Danimal said on 3/Apr/08
S4M says on 3/Apr/08
He's got an ENORMOUS head size. Maybe it's that elongated head of his that'z giving the impression of a 6 foot plus guy. I'd say he was a STRONG 5'11 in his prime and about 5'10 now. EVEN with that big head he doesn't look like a 6'2.
And you were born yesterday, weren't you?? He was TALLER than Tom Arnold, David Letterman, 1-2" shorter than Conan Obrien, taller than Dan Akroyd, etc, etc, etc....What don't you UNDERSTAND about that?
S4M says on 3/Apr/08
He's got an ENORMOUS head size. Maybe it's that elongated head of his that'z giving the impression of a 6 foot plus guy. I'd say he was a STRONG 5'11 in his prime and about 5'10 now. EVEN with that big head he doesn't look like a 6'2.
And you were born yesterday, weren't you?? He was TALLER than Tom Arnold, David Letterman, 1-2" shorter than Conan Obrien, taller than Dan Akroyd, etc, etc, etc....What don't you UNDERSTAND about that?
S4M said on 3/Apr/08
He's got an ENORMOUS head size. Maybe it's that elongated head of his that'z giving the impression of a 6 foot plus guy. I'd say he was a STRONG 5'11 in his prime and about 5'10 now. EVEN with that big head he doesn't look like a 6'2.
He's got an ENORMOUS head size. Maybe it's that elongated head of his that'z giving the impression of a 6 foot plus guy. I'd say he was a STRONG 5'11 in his prime and about 5'10 now. EVEN with that big head he doesn't look like a 6'2.
Danimal said on 3/Apr/08
Time for some legite height comparisons:
John and Steven Weber (recent enough pic): Click Here
John and Steve Carell (recent): Click Here
John and Billy Crystal: Click Here
John and Dan Akroyd: Click Here (This one is obvious that Goodman was at least 6'2" at one point, seeing Dan is at the very least 6'1" himself).
Another with Akroyd: Click Here (come one...here John's leaning in and obviously looks like a 6'2"-6'3" man)
Goodman and Rick Moranis: Click Here
Random pic of a very tall looking Goodman: Click Here
Another with John standing tall (recent pic) with Steven Weber (about 2-3" on him): Click Here
Isn't that 5'10"-5'11" Martha Stewart who he is towering over?: Click Here
Picture of a taller and healthier Goodman with good posture, who would have towered over Glenn by at least 6" (from 1989): Click Here
This is sadly what caused the talented Goodman to lose height (severely obese...about 400 pounds). Even with all that extra weight he still stood tall: Click Here
Time for some legite height comparisons:
John and Steven Weber (recent enough pic): Click Here
John and Steve Carell (recent): Click Here
John and Billy Crystal: Click Here
John and Dan Akroyd: Click Here (This one is obvious that Goodman was at least 6'2" at one point, seeing Dan is at the very least 6'1" himself).
Another with Akroyd: Click Here (come one...here John's leaning in and obviously looks like a 6'2"-6'3" man)
Goodman and Rick Moranis: Click Here
Random pic of a very tall looking Goodman: Click Here
Another with John standing tall (recent pic) with Steven Weber (about 2-3" on him): Click Here
Isn't that 5'10"-5'11" Martha Stewart who he is towering over?: Click Here
Picture of a taller and healthier Goodman with good posture, who would have towered over Glenn by at least 6" (from 1989): Click Here
This is sadly what caused the talented Goodman to lose height (severely obese...about 400 pounds). Even with all that extra weight he still stood tall: Click Here
Ian said on 2/Apr/08
Looks 5ft11-6ft if he straightens his head here but with all that extra weight he carries around it has obviously affected his height. Gravity is going to pull down a big man like that. Maybe he was once 6ft 2, maybe if he was stretched out he'd be that height.
Looks 5ft11-6ft if he straightens his head here but with all that extra weight he carries around it has obviously affected his height. Gravity is going to pull down a big man like that. Maybe he was once 6ft 2, maybe if he was stretched out he'd be that height.
glenn said on 2/Apr/08
i hardly know anything about the guy.serious.
i hardly know anything about the guy.serious.
glenn said on 2/Apr/08
maybe.i doubt ill see him anytime soon.basically bumped into him.im not sure if i ever saw him before.i dont think i did.
maybe.i doubt ill see him anytime soon.basically bumped into him.im not sure if i ever saw him before.i dont think i did.
Viper said on 1/Apr/08
Thing is, Goodman looked 6-2 to me in the last movie I saw him in. It was that Kevin Bacon vigilante movie. Goodman was hillarious in it. Goodman is awesome in these cameo comedic roles.
Thing is, Goodman looked 6-2 to me in the last movie I saw him in. It was that Kevin Bacon vigilante movie. Goodman was hillarious in it. Goodman is awesome in these cameo comedic roles.
Socom said on 1/Apr/08
Maybe one day you can get another pic with him having better posture Glenn? He's got to be taller than he looks in this picture I'm sure.
Maybe one day you can get another pic with him having better posture Glenn? He's got to be taller than he looks in this picture I'm sure.
Mattiew_- said on 31/Mar/08
He looks 5'11 here ...
He looks 5'11 here ...
Viper said on 31/Mar/08
His posture is just horrendous here.
His posture is just horrendous here.
Silver said on 31/Mar/08
lol this man lost height or maybe it's just a bad posture of him in that pic
lol this man lost height or maybe it's just a bad posture of him in that pic
Danimal said on 31/Mar/08
We also shouldn't forget he played 6'2" Babe Ruth!!
We also shouldn't forget he played 6'2" Babe Ruth!!
sf said on 31/Mar/08
Somebody visited the Erin Moran page???? LOL...
Somebody visited the Erin Moran page???? LOL...
Andrew said on 30/Mar/08
Obesity can cause poor posture or perhaps a perminant lost in height,I mean Goodman has always been a big dude butin the 90's he became Obese.Check out the fallen movie,Denzel is 6'1" and Goodman is an inch taller than him so 6'3" peak and now 6'2",Goodman is the kind of guy that you would say is well over six feet tall,but now that he's 6'2" you'll say he's a little over six feet.
Obesity can cause poor posture or perhaps a perminant lost in height,I mean Goodman has always been a big dude butin the 90's he became Obese.Check out the fallen movie,Denzel is 6'1" and Goodman is an inch taller than him so 6'3" peak and now 6'2",Goodman is the kind of guy that you would say is well over six feet tall,but now that he's 6'2" you'll say he's a little over six feet.
sf said on 30/Mar/08
Probably, more than anything, I'm just being difficult...
Probably, more than anything, I'm just being difficult...
sf said on 30/Mar/08
Danimal - I'd agree to 6'2" easily. You're assuming that Tom Arnold and Michael O'Keefe (Jackie's BF) are 6'2", both of which I believe are 6'1", max.
He could have been 6'3", I don't know. I'm just saying I'd rarely rely on a college height listing as accurate. From high school on, these guys are routinely listed an inch or two above their heights. No doubt about it, a pretty big guy.
Danimal - I'd agree to 6'2" easily. You're assuming that Tom Arnold and Michael O'Keefe (Jackie's BF) are 6'2", both of which I believe are 6'1", max.
He could have been 6'3", I don't know. I'm just saying I'd rarely rely on a college height listing as accurate. From high school on, these guys are routinely listed an inch or two above their heights. No doubt about it, a pretty big guy.
glenn said on 30/Mar/08
thanks danimal.its clear the man lost height and has terrible posture.there is no trickey on my part.
thanks danimal.its clear the man lost height and has terrible posture.there is no trickey on my part.
Anthony said on 30/Mar/08
Also, Rob, clicking on the Erin Moran photo on the main page leads you to Goodman's page. Just thought I'd let you know for future repair.
Also, Rob, clicking on the Erin Moran photo on the main page leads you to Goodman's page. Just thought I'd let you know for future repair.
Anthony said on 30/Mar/08
Don't forget that in "The Big Lebowski," he was a solid inch taller than Bridges in every scene. Bridges wore slippers throughout the film and I'm pretty sure Goodman was in bowling shoes.
I do agree that he has lost height, though, or may as well have considering his posture.
Don't forget that in "The Big Lebowski," he was a solid inch taller than Bridges in every scene. Bridges wore slippers throughout the film and I'm pretty sure Goodman was in bowling shoes.
I do agree that he has lost height, though, or may as well have considering his posture.
Danimal said on 30/Mar/08
Sorry Glenn, I just read it too! My mistake and btw, I love you too buddy ;)..
SF, Goodman had a solid inch on Tom Arnold on Roseanne on ALL occasions and Tom was 6'1"-6'2" himself. Goodman was AS TALL as Fred (JAckie's bf), who was 6'2" himself. Come on, Goodman was a TALL man all throughout the 80's (an INCH shorter than that big 6'4" BRUTE in Nerds) and the 90's and YES, the 3 times I've seen him on Letterman, Goodman had a solid inch on him and was 1 MAX 2" shorter than Conan Obrien as later as 2001. Something has happened to this man since then.
Sorry Glenn, I just read it too! My mistake and btw, I love you too buddy ;)..
SF, Goodman had a solid inch on Tom Arnold on Roseanne on ALL occasions and Tom was 6'1"-6'2" himself. Goodman was AS TALL as Fred (JAckie's bf), who was 6'2" himself. Come on, Goodman was a TALL man all throughout the 80's (an INCH shorter than that big 6'4" BRUTE in Nerds) and the 90's and YES, the 3 times I've seen him on Letterman, Goodman had a solid inch on him and was 1 MAX 2" shorter than Conan Obrien as later as 2001. Something has happened to this man since then.
glenn said on 30/Mar/08
thanks dr.d.its actually dirty and beat.need to get a new one. excellent point sf.
thanks dr.d.its actually dirty and beat.need to get a new one. excellent point sf.
glenn said on 30/Mar/08
thanks for backing me that he can look 6ft kingz.
thanks for backing me that he can look 6ft kingz.
OutBenchThis said on 29/Mar/08
Peak height may well have been 6'2" but I'm sure he's probably lost an inch or more since then. I'd say 184 cm -185 cm (6.05" - 6'1") could be right for his current height.
Peak height may well have been 6'2" but I'm sure he's probably lost an inch or more since then. I'd say 184 cm -185 cm (6.05" - 6'1") could be right for his current height.
Hillbilly said on 29/Mar/08
If John Goodman is 6'2 in that picture then Glenn must be 6'0 because im 6'0 and when i stand next to someone thats 6'2 thats about the height difference that there is. So either John is 6'2 and Glenn is 6'0 or Glenn is 5'8 and John is like 5'10 or 5'11
If John Goodman is 6'2 in that picture then Glenn must be 6'0 because im 6'0 and when i stand next to someone thats 6'2 thats about the height difference that there is. So either John is 6'2 and Glenn is 6'0 or Glenn is 5'8 and John is like 5'10 or 5'11
sf said on 29/Mar/08
What does a college listing have to do with anything? Always exaggerated by an inch or two - common practice.
What does a college listing have to do with anything? Always exaggerated by an inch or two - common practice.
glenn said on 29/Mar/08
danimal-i love you to death,but you still have that habit of never reading my posts.i said he looked 6ft with terrible posture.obviously more if straighter.how much more im not clear.yes,i expected a 6-2 guy.and yes,he was that at least at one time.
danimal-i love you to death,but you still have that habit of never reading my posts.i said he looked 6ft with terrible posture.obviously more if straighter.how much more im not clear.yes,i expected a 6-2 guy.and yes,he was that at least at one time.
kingz said on 29/Mar/08
glen looks 6" in this picture but john goodman never stands straight he always walks with his back down, i saw him at the hard rock once iam 6"2 and he was atleast maybe 2 or 1 inches shorter than me. But in roseane he always walks straight but that was more than 20 years ago when he was young.
glen looks 6" in this picture but john goodman never stands straight he always walks with his back down, i saw him at the hard rock once iam 6"2 and he was atleast maybe 2 or 1 inches shorter than me. But in roseane he always walks straight but that was more than 20 years ago when he was young.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.