Leone_Fan said on 1/Jun/23
Great photo. From what I understand these pictures are taken very quickly with not much if any of a conversation between the celebrity and the members of the paying public. So I guess Rob wouldn't really have had a chance to say that the photo could be used on this site even if he had been inclined to divulge that information. Which might not be wise anyway as I'd imagine some celebs are very private or protective of their image. Although some might not care or find it amusing.
If I had to guess I'd say in the 5'11'' to 6ft range. I'd guess although I'm not certain that Richard Harris was a bigger man than any of his sons so he probably wasn't as short as the 5'10'' some on here claim he was in person.
Editor Rob
You're certainly better off trying to get a chat at the autograph table than the photoshoots.
With more popular photo ops it can be conveyer like, but sometimes with other guests you can have more than a 'hi'.
Nik Ashton said on 1/Jun/20
The average guess could be spots!
movieguy12 said on 31/May/20
To me this guy looks a clear 6ft if Rob is 5'8'' or so. I don't know why some say he is under 5'11''. On the Richard Harris page someone talks of an encounter with Richard and his son describing Harris as 6'2'' and his son 6'4''. However none of his sons seems to be this height as far as I can tell from online searches. Sometimes you wonder whether people on here just make up stories of celeb encounters for a joke or whether they simply over estimate heights in general
Bobby 5'10 said on 21/Jan/19
I think more 5'11-5'11.25 range than 5'11.5. More 180/181 than 181/182cm range. Though maybe the pic reduced his height.
Zampo said on 8/Aug/18
I'm remember you saying that you tend to lose height when standing back to back. Would you say though that you are standing well here (I think so)? Because if so, I think this listing is spot on!
Editor Rob
It will vary a bit over the photos....I'd say this one with Harris was a better stance than others...but then look at Sam Coleman, I stood much worse for that, but he seemed to stand a bit more worse than me!
Click Here - at fullest height on the right...such a stance would be rare, although I am sure a few celebs have caught me out with better or worse than expected posture.
Sometimes it is a gamble doing a pose like a back-to-back!
Zampo said on 27/Apr/18
He can't be under 5'11. His eye-level looks 170-ish cm. 5'11.5 is a reasonable shout. 181-182 cm range.
World Citizen said on 21/Feb/18
Looks 181 cm
Victor Surratt said on 10/Feb/17
5'11.5 is okay for him, good listing.
Peter 179cm said on 29/Jan/17
Actually he looks no more than 179 with Rob,maybe barely 180.That's how i look with an 172-173cm friend of mine...
mickey said on 2/Jan/17
judging by the photo, i would say 181cm.
Jackson said on 1/Jan/17
Jamie Hirris is a Solid 5'10"
Shredder said on 3/Dec/16
5'11 flat and under is not even possible , get real folks.
phil said on 1/Dec/16
id say around 5"11 and a quarter
Peter 179cm said on 1/Dec/16
He looks more 181 than 182cm but 5'11.5 seems reasonable during the day.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Dec/16
Wow...all three sons never grew to be as tall or taller than Richard
Andrea said on 1/Dec/16
He looks a solid 5'11, somewhere around 181 seems very possible for this guy!