5'11james said on 2/Sep/23
He looks between 178-178.5cm
hhhhhhh said on 1/Sep/23
I can tell how tall he is compared to many people. 177cm
James (179cm) Jones said on 13/Apr/23
5'10 and a quarter for Daniel Craig.
Gerald S said on 12/Apr/23
No chance of 5’10.5” at his low. 5’10.25” would be the highest I could go for Craig’s afternoon height. A very slim chance of a weak 5’10”, but probably one solid 5’10”.
Darksol64 said on 7/Apr/23
@ Sean / Rob:
If you go back to the old movies, him being the shortest is almost irrelevant. Even the 6'1-6'2 actors looked like 12 year olds fighting the 7'2 actor Richard Kiel playing Jaws. haha!
Terry said on 6/Apr/23
I think 5'10 is accurate for him. It is a good height. It is a good height to be in real life Secret service as you won't stand out as much.
5'7 and a fraction said on 19/Feb/23
"Let's just say I am somewhere between 5ft and 6ft"
Clearly couldn't give two hoots about his height. Good attitude.
Darksol64 said on 18/Jan/23
@ QM6'1.5
Fully agree. No chance below 5'10, and not likely to be over 5'10.5
Noticeably taller than average height guy.
QM6'1.5"QM said on 17/Jan/23
If someone is interested about how does it looks real 5'10" guy then Daniel is a perfect celebrity to show and share!
Sean Forrest said on 29/Dec/22
Rob do you think people/the press weren't originally happy to have Daniel Craig as James Bond because he wasn't tall or because of other things like having blonde hair, previous acting roles
Editor Rob
Certainly some comments were made about him being the shortest Bond, but I think once Casino Royale came out, his Height wasn't as big an issue.
Paulinho said on 24/Dec/22
Have you seen the new film glass onion on Netflix Rob? There only seemed to be an inch difference between himself and Ed norton, think he needs the quarter inch upgrade to 5 ft 10 1/2, what do you think?
Editor Rob
Norton has been looking under 6ft, it would not surprise me if his past injuries (breaking 3 vertebrae) have contributed to some fractional loss by now.
Gearsley said on 10/Dec/22
I believe there is a chance Craig dips below 5’10” but a slim one. I would discount 5’10.5’ before discounting 5’9.75”. Solid 5’10” is the best fit though.
Emil said on 26/Nov/22
No chance Craig dips below 5'10.
Darksol64 said on 13/Oct/22
The 5'8 girl should be about 5'11.5 with her heels right? He's eye to eye with her. He's also eye to eye with the guy that's half an inch taller than him.
So maybe he wears very modest inserts of about 1/2 inch or so inside 1 inch shoes? Pics consistently suggest so. Definitely nowhere near a Downie-Jr. level of lift, just a little boost.
Shell said on 13/Oct/22
He has a short look. Would’ve guessed 5’8. Maybe it’s his body proportions.
ZDA said on 30/Sep/22
177cm
Mikelino said on 29/Sep/22
strikes me as an intelligent man that isn't negatively affected by the fact that he isn't mega tall.
Reis said on 18/Sep/22
Hey Rob Daniel, what do you think is the smallest size she could measure when she was younger?
Editor Rob
I don't think he falls under 5ft 10
Voorhees Myers said on 27/Jul/22
He’s actually known for his generous shoe insoles. 5-10 barefoot imo.
FloJ said on 25/Jul/22
So funny that Craig’s height is the only Bond to qualify for the real life British spy agency. Their requirement states a spy cannot be over 180cm tall because he will stand out.
It’s weird that Bond is described as 6’0 and most of the Bond actors are 6’1 +. In real life a 5’7-5’10 guy draws far less attention and can blend in much easier.
Rory said on 19/Jul/22
I don't think they're as bothered by height for Bond now,I think in the 20th century you probably would have had to be 5ft11+ to be considered,but today's world is much more open than it used to be and I could see a 5ft9 guy getting the gig,even though I'd probably say 6ft to 6ft2 at a push maybe 6ft3, is the ideal range for Bond.
avi said on 16/Jul/22
@Lucid said on 17/Jun/22
In the books Bond is about "183cm" so about 6'0
I think 5'9 is too small for Bond
5'11-6'1 could be ok
I agree 6'2-6'3 (legit 6'2) is realistically too tall
Lucid said on 17/Jun/22
I was asking because I heard that Tom Hardy is looking like the #1 contender, and I believe he's only 5'9. Also Tom Holland is determined to get the role, and at only 5'6, it makes me wonder if that might limit him.
I heard that the Broccoli Family were very interested in Cillian Murphy at one point in 2006, but thought he was a bit too young at the time, and at only 5'7, could he really have pulled it off? Makes me wonder if in this new era where we are more accepting, can we be a little more accepting on height? I'd actually find a 5'9 James Bond more believable than a 6'4 James Bond. Look at Cruise as Jack Reacher, or Stallone as Rambo. It makes it look easier to have tough opponents/enemies like Craig vs Batista lol
Editor Rob
5ft 9 would be a perfect height to blend in compared to a more striking 6ft 2-3 height.
Lucid said on 16/Jun/22
Rob, do you think they'd ever cast a James Bond at the height of 5'8-5'9?
Editor Rob
I don't know if they have a certain limit to height for casting....I might think they have an idea and it could be 5ft 8 is too low.
Vibram said on 14/Jun/22
Looks exactly 177cm next to 175cm Prince Charles. Both were wearing similar dress shoes.
Click Here
Weak 5'10/strong 5'9 for Craig.
DragonTattoo said on 5/Jun/22
In the movies he looks 5'9 range. Not more.
rlheight5'11 said on 5/Jun/22
Daniel has got to the age where height can be lost. Some underestimate his height as he barely looks over 5'10. When you barely measure a certain height you can look under it at times. I still haven't seen his latest bond.
Jawilder said on 20/May/22
Perfect example of a legit 5’10. Nothing over before bed imo
5'7 and a bit said on 2/May/22
The average guess is a joke.
JamesBond said on 23/Apr/22
He looked about same height with 5'9 Andy Robertson!
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 13/Apr/22
I’ve seen Daniel in many good films, but I can never warm to
Bond.
He appeared in ‘Elizabeth’, having been sent from the Roman Catholic Church to kill Protestant Queen, Elizabeth I. He wore a black cloak and looked extremely menacing.
I can believe 5ft10.25 for him.
Harris said on 11/Apr/22
dosent look a full 5 ft 10, there is a recent picture of him standing next to liverpool soccer player Salah and he is a strong 5 ft 8, and Salah is slouching down in the photo there dosent seem to be much of a difference between the two.
I'd say Craig is only 5 ft 9 1/2
Kefenci said on 10/Apr/22
if this guy's average is 177.7cm then she is not more than 180cm in the morning
QM6'1.5"QM said on 29/Mar/22
5'10.25" afternoon.
5'10" evening.
Kefenci said on 22/Mar/22
Rob Daniel doesn't get more than 180cm out of bed at the top, right?
Editor Rob
He's probably around that 180cm mark first thing.
Wehrmacht180 said on 14/Mar/22
177 cm
viper said on 17/Feb/22
The lowest Id go for him is 5-9.75
Chaips said on 14/Feb/22
Craig is a bit of a height mystery, but I have a good idea of his height. Here's a photo when he visited the F1 paddock.
Click Here
Craig looks a bit taller than Pierre Gasly, but he's also standing on a small step and in thick shoes. The racing driver shoes are very flat, they don't add any height. Gasly is listed 177cm and I'm confident it's accurate. Max Verstappen is often listed 181, but more likely 177-180. Interestingly the Red Bull-associated drivers (These two and Sainz, Ricciardo) are all very similar in height.
Craig's body size looks similar to Gasly, maybe he's shorter if not the thick shoes and standing on a ledge? Craig could have small lifts in his shoes, but it's unknown. Other photos show him not that much taller to Red Bull boss Christian Horner, who is in 5'8 range.
People who met Craig or saw him said he was "compact" or smaller than he looks on screen, and a journalist described him as "No more than 5-9". Craig obviously isn't tall, he's very average height.
I think Craig barefoot could be 176 / 5'9,3. Looking at barefoot height, if he's 178, in shoes he could look 180+. He would start to look tallish, which he never really does.
They also cast around his height. His 007 films don't have much tall people, apart from Dave Bautista. Jeffrey Wright is same size as Craig, Mads Mikkelsen and Ralph Fiennes similar height too. You can notice it in premiere- and candid photos. Heights differ in films a lot.
Sinclair said on 11/Feb/22
Craig can pull off looking 5’11” at times in his last three James Bond films, as he looks the same height as Ralph Fiennes, but I suspect lifts to have helped Craig. Craig also has a couple of inches on Monica Bellucci in Spectre, even when she is wearing heels. However, in No Time To Die, Jeffrey Wright seemingly edges out Craig, somewhat surprisingly, as Craig had about an inch on Wright in Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace.
The fact that Craig was barely taller than an old Paul Newman (who never exceeded 5’9.5”) in Road to Perdition, leads me to believe no more than a flat 5’10” for Craig. An ageing Michael Gambon also had a good inch on Craig in Layer Cake, interesting...
Mohammed 170cm said on 7/Feb/22
He's 53, but I don't think he has lost anything yet. I gave him the full 5'10", but now I got an impression that he is a weak 5'10" guy. Still looked decent size in his films, not too tall, not too short, just in the middle.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 13/Jan/22
I rated Daniel's performance as the nasty John Ballard in the film 'Elizabeth', and another of my favourite films of Dan's is 'The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo'. His movie 'Dream House', in which he stars alongside his wife, Rachel Weisz, is well worth giving a watch too.
5ft10.25.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Jan/22
Should hit 5ft11 out of bed
?mer said on 11/Jan/22
so you said Rob Daniel would be around 5'11 in the morning when she was 20-30 years old, what would you say in cm?
Editor Rob
About 180cm
?mer said on 10/Jan/22
When Daniel was young, she wasn't more than 180cm tall in the morning, right?
Editor Rob
Out of bed he probably got near 5ft 11
LogicalLB said on 5/Jan/22
5'9.5
digling said on 29/Dec/21
His small head makes him look short, I guess 177cm flat barefoot at night.
Bradley said on 27/Dec/21
Stacked heels and lift customs with the tall gals.....at 5-10 he can't look shorter than them in dress shoees.He's a weak 5-10.
Andy Beaden said on 23/Dec/21
In our friends in the North he was the shortest of the four and in the Harrison Ford photo wears 4 inches of lifts.
Click Here
Rising174cm said on 12/Dec/21
The 1/4" downgrade would be perfect. All he'd need is a small lift at times post-Quantum of Solace, and even Rob has suspected this of Daniel. I could buy Craig at 5'10" flat and Jude Law at 5'10.5" honestly. Jude is definitely taller. An admitted 178 cm actor like Guy Pearce also looks like more of a solid 5'10" to me than Craig.
SnakePlissken said on 10/Dec/21
Also Rob, I noticed below you said Daniel Craigs looks wouldn't turn heads in a room, but you believe 6 foot tall Pierce Brosnans looks would.
Do you think if Pierce Brosnan were 5'8, he'd still have people turning heads?
A lot of people put looks down to height, but I disagree. I imagine Tom Cruise as James Bond would turn more heads than Roger Moore, and Tom Cruise is 5'7, Roger Moore 6'1+. Although I do think Pierce was the best.
I also imagine Richard Madden as James Bond at 5'8/9 would turn a lot more heads. Our Scottish hero, aye? ;)
Editor Rob
In terms of looks and stature, Brosnan will stand out in a room a lot more than Craig.
SnakePlissken said on 10/Dec/21
I agree on the quarter inch downgrade, I personally see him as a 5'9.5 guy, so I think 5'10 is acceptable.
Daniel Ross said on 3/Dec/21
What do you think his inseam is? Based on internet searches I’m guessing 33 although another actor who is 5’10.25 Steven silver has that inseam and has a much smaller head and probably longer legs than him.
I’m guessing 32.5
Editor Rob
Yeah if measured it could be 32 range
Mohammed-170cm said on 28/Nov/21
@Rob- Am I only the only one who guessed him as 6 foot? Honestly he always gives tall impression and has managed to not looking "Short" with 6 footers.
5ft 10 fot Daniel Craig.
Editor Rob
I'm sure he's been guessed by people as 5ft 11 or 6ft, but most would just go with 5ft 10 for him.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 24/Nov/21
I like what Gemma Arterton had to say in the passage up top about Daniel being good-humoured when he had to wear built-up shoes in order to do the romantic scenes with her.
What a great attitude! 😆👌
5ft10.
T.M. said on 22/Nov/21
5'10".
Rising174cm said on 17/Nov/21
Craig could look 179 cm beginning with Quantum of Solace, but prior to that, he looked much closer to 177 cm than 179. He hasn't lost an inch. If anything, he looks taller now than he did in his 30s. As I said, it just so happens that he began looking taller precisely when his co-star said he wore lifts. It wouldn't be the first time an actor tried to live up to an image. See him during Road to Perdition era and the question isn't whether he's over 5'10". It's whether he is a full 5'10".
Ford was probably 5'11" max by then and looking shorter with posture. The Expendables 3 was filmed just 2 years later and you can see how a 67 year old Stallone pulled off a similar height to Ford on screen meaning Ford may have already been down to the 179-180 range.
berta said on 17/Nov/21
he can look 179 in photos. remember that he was maybe 2 cm shorter than harrison ford 10 years ago. and i think ford could have been 181 back then. i think 178-178,5.
Zach Marsh said on 16/Nov/21
I'd be willing to guess he's down to 5'10 now but could he have been as much as a full inch taller back in his 20s? He seems closer to Christopher Eccleston in Our Friends in the North than I think a flat 5'10 would be.
MaskDeMasque 5'9.5 said on 15/Nov/21
Needs a quarter inch downgrade.
Rising174cm said on 14/Nov/21
It was quite clear Daniel was not above the 5'10" his Quantum of Solace co-star said he was until that film when he, by sheer coincidence, I'm sure, also wore lifts. After that, he could look 179 cm range a fair amount, but not before. Jude Law is definitely a bit taller.
Aiden Caffrey said on 10/Nov/21
@Rob Do you think Daniel's neck is a bit on the shorter side? I've seen pictures of him with hugh jackman, Chris Evans, and even his own daughter and it seems like his neck is shorter compared to theirs. Then again this could be angles/an illusion or maybe even his head shape. It's hard to tell
I must look like an idiot accidentally typing "@Dave". Forgive me I was sleep-deprived
Editor Rob
Looking at when he had his best physique, he had great upper body definition and muscle, which might effect things...wouldn't have said it seemed that much less than average.
Aiden Caffrey said on 8/Nov/21
@Dave Do you think Daniel's neck is a bit on the shorter side? I've seen pictures of him with hugh jackman, Chris Evans, and even his own daughter and it seems like his neck is shorter compared to theirs. Then again this could be angles/an illusion or maybe even his head shape. It's hard to tell
PJ said on 18/Oct/21
Looked 5'9 again on SNL the other night.
6footTom said on 18/Oct/21
His height is rather strange in the new Bond film. At times, he can look nearly on par with Ralph Fiennes, and at others, he barely edges out Jeffrey Wright.
Johan 185 cm said on 16/Oct/21
5'10" always has been. Happy the Bourne era is over and maybe just maybe we can get a James Bond movie now. He wasn't the worst but compared to Connery or Brosnan?
Muscular said on 15/Oct/21
Looks like solid 178 and it’s average in Europe and a bit taller than the average Middle East country male , 3 inch taller than average asian country male.By the way he looks taller than his real height because he wears good sized shoes.
From Turkey with love!
Fair Whisper said on 14/Oct/21
5'10", or just on the cusp.
D Brown said on 14/Oct/21
Has proportions of 5'9 guy. Excellent actor nonetheless and the best Bond there has been.
Ian C. said on 14/Oct/21
I guess you guys haven't heard about the ending of No Time to Die, and I wouldn't want to give it away here. I will say, if the next Bond movie continues where NTtD left off, that Sean Connery and Roger Moore could both play him well.
RJT said on 13/Oct/21
@Argo
I agree with you, which is why I think Henry Golding fits as the next Bond. He has the look, charisma and just right amount of height.
Blackened said on 11/Oct/21
5-9 and the worst Bond after Lazenby.
Argo said on 9/Oct/21
I know James Bond is supposed to be 6 feet tall in the novels but 5’10-5’11” is the perfect height for the character. Bond is supposed to be a spy, so he should blend in and not stick out like a sore thumb in public. Plus he’s not supposed to be a physically imposing brawler. Daniel Craig’s height is just another reason why he’s the best James Bond.
dicky curtis said on 8/Oct/21
5.10 tops. Maybe even a tad under.
MaskDeMasque 5'9.5 said on 5/Oct/21
Nothing under 5'10. I'm really not seeing the 5'9.5 or 5'9.75 some are saying. Lifts or not, he physically looks taller than someone like myself. 5'10.25 is a stretch though, I think a legit 5'10.25 guy like guy Pearce would edge out Craig.
JJDubbs said on 4/Oct/21
Daniel is 5'10. And he's the best bond ever.
Tall Sam said on 4/Oct/21
He was sold Bond in spite of being average height but though his films were the most solid Bond films in years but by the end mostly felt like a CGI slough by the end for me. Craig is a lot more interesting and fun in other roles like Knives Out.
Arch Stanton said on 3/Oct/21
The next Bond actor I think needs to be more smooth and laid back and more of a sense of humour/the chauvinism we saw with previous Bonds. And ideally tall and dark. I really can't think of anybody who would be perfect at the moment.
Arch Stanton said on 3/Oct/21
Brosnan also tends to dress elegantly and Craig dresses more like the regular man, so in a beanie and jeans or combats and sneakers a guy like Craig could get away without being noticed much on the street. Brosnan would stand out anywhere.
I must confess I'm not really interested in the Bond films these days. I think Craig is a good actor and has done a very good job but the script and the "forced" way they are shot, the hyper Bourne-esque action just doesn't appeal to me. I haven't looked forward to a new Bond film since Casino Royale after the disappointment of Quantum of Solace. It doesn't help that things have gone woke and you can't get away with the misogyny of previous decades which was very much part of the Bond character.
ChaosControl 189.3cm said on 3/Oct/21
I like the honesty in his 5’10 claim
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Oct/21
rheight5’11, disagree...the previous guys all blended in height-wise despite being taller.
Anywhere from 6ft to 6ft3 with black hair, blue eyes, late 30’s/early 40’s is ideal. Getting a 6ft5 guy would be ridiculous
rlheight5'11 said on 2/Oct/21
@Rob Yeah was gonna mention connery as he's 6'2, both guys would be turning a lot of heads.
Editor Rob
The taller you are, the more people notice it.
RJT said on 1/Oct/21
5'10 is fine and not short imo, but maybe he feels that way cause other Bond actors were all over 6ft.
It's not like he's 5'7 or so he has to hide his height.
rlheight5'11 said on 30/Sep/21
Even now they still run them . I don't mind it, yeah usually 15-20 mins of ads and trailers before film starts, i was checking lol..and Craig's height was perfect for blending in. A 6'1-6'2 agent is unrealistic.
Editor Rob
Also, Daniel's looks may also benefit the blending in...if you consider somebody like Brosnan, when that 6ft 1 range Handsome man walks into a room, he will turn the heads of both women and men.
rlheight5'11 said on 29/Sep/21
@Rob The premiere for his film was last night and he played bond for 15 yrs. I will miss him. Who knows what happens next. Craig is a great Bond.
Editor Rob
Not been to the cinema for ages. I remember the last time I was there, I counted 15 adverts and about 6 trailers and a couple of 'public service announcements'. By the time they finished I was half asleep!
At roughly 5ft 10, Craig was a good height for blending in.
Andy Beaden said on 28/Sep/21
Hi there. See this link from our friends in the North
Click Here
The key is Daniel Craig is 3 inches shorter than Christopher Eccelstone. Eccelstone is not 6ft. He is under that. So zero chance of Craig being over 5 9.
OriginalAnon said on 25/Sep/21
178.4 looks too high for me. He looks like 177cm at a push.
Iamfrench said on 19/Aug/21
I think he doesn't looks that tall.
177cm is great for him.
A Lawrence said on 3/Aug/21
Nowhere near 6feet!!
James Harris said on 2/Aug/21
If Craig was 5 foot 11 at any time of day he would be described as 5foot 11. He is described as 5 foot 10 that is his maximum
Larcus said on 14/Jul/21
So he is exactly 5"11 when he wakes up?
Editor Rob
got a chance at it
MaskDeMasque said on 6/Jun/21
@Slim
What makes you think he's under 5'10? The only time I remember him looking under 5'10 was with that SNL sketch with 5'8.5 Keenan but he was slouching.
Slim 6'1.5 said on 30/May/21
He isn’t 5’10” let alone a bit over it, 177 max!
James Harris said on 24/May/21
Craig never ever looks tall. Previous Bonds have appeared with tall women but they never look short.
He is very height conscious, stretches when standing and probably wears lifts but never looks tall. 5 foot 9 dead.
Anything over 5 foot 10 is absurd.
James Harris said on 24/May/21
I remember when Amy pascal claimed that Craig was the same height as Sean Connery
viper said on 17/May/21
He looks taller than 5-9
Joey Diaz said on 16/May/21
5’9.5 is being generous. The 5’11 claim is laughable
viper said on 19/Apr/21
Better chance I win the powerball this year.
Jesus, he's only 53, lol
JamesFreakingBond said on 17/Apr/21
Does anyone think it's possible Craig could have lost height already at age 53?
MaskDeMasque said on 12/Apr/21
Why the quarter inch Rob? I think a legit 5'10.25 like
Jude Law would edge him out. 5'10.
ALEXIZ/180cm said on 6/Apr/21
177 cm
Rufus Firefly said on 28/Feb/21
I think there’s a wisdom of crowds thing going on with Craig. Few say he’s over 5’10.25”, few put him at 5’9.25” or lower. Most put him at 5’10” and, give or take a tiny amount, that seems right. As others have said, he just doesn’t really come across as “short” or “tall” - which is kinda bang on the money for those of us who are 5’10” (I’ve had as many people say I’m short as tall).
I think he’s a good Bond. He plays the role in an ice cold fashion, which works with his eyes and thin lips, and brutish physique. But he’s no Connery, who truly embodied the savoir-faire of Bond. Whether he was seducing a woman with a playful raise of the eyebrows and smile and friendly tone, or kicking somebody’s ass with righteous fury, or acting like a well-behaved and chastened schoolboy with his boss M - Connery was the complete embodiment, and set a really impossible yardstick for everyone else.
Harris said on 19/Feb/21
If you look on James bond wardrobe on Instagram they give pictures and description of what outfits the bonds played.
Majority of Craig's footwear was boots. He was probably wearing lifts all the time and there is a snl clip of with Kenan Thompson and he looks quite short there.
Even with jude laws photos there who knows if Jude had lifts in them.
I think craig I'd between 176.5cm to 177.5cm
Rising174cm said on 6/Feb/21
@The5'11Dude: Well he wore lifts in Quantum of Solace, at least, so he should have looked taller if he was really 5'10". That said, I do think he could look at least 5'10.5" range in subsequent Bond films, but pre-Bond and even Casino Royale era, I don't see a guy over 5'10".
@Slim: Here are the
Jude Law comparisons that show you're correct:
Click Here Don't be fooled by Craig's better posture and raised eye level, Jude is taller despite the slouch. And Jude was clearly taller at the Riad to Perdition premiere:
Click Here Click Here
I see 5'10" max here with 6'1.5" Jackman:
Click Here Click Here Similarly, when Craig appeared on Letterman in 2006, he looked about 5'10" with the then-6'1"-6'1.5" Letterman. More recently, he did look a solid 5'10" on Colbert as he was very close to the 5'10.5" Colbert's height, but he was wearing boot. In general, from about Quantum of Solace on, Craig has usually worn boots and higher cut footwear. I've seen more evidence to suggest he wears (small) lifts at times than, say, Brad Pitt.
Genau said on 1/Feb/21
177-177.5 cm
The5'11Dude said on 30/Jan/21
He looked 5'10-5'10.25 in the 4 Bond films he's been in. Rob, do you think he's lost any height at 52?
slim 6'1 said on 29/Jan/21
I’ve got him at 177cm
Rising174cm said on 21/Jan/21
@Slim: Jude did edge Craig when they stood together.
@Lawrence: True, Daniel could struggle with 5'10" there and pre-Bond in general though I think 5'10" flat is fair.
Luci paura said on 18/Jan/21
5'10 exact.
slim 6'1 said on 12/Jan/21
179 out of bed ✅
slim 6'1 said on 9/Jan/21
I think a solid 5’10” like Jude law would edge him out ✅
Lawrence099 said on 2/Jan/21
Honestly in the older pictures I’ve seen of him with Gwyneth Paltrow he holds up no better beside her than
Matt Damon.
Rising174cm said on 1/Jan/21
It was pretty clear he was nothing over 5'10" flat and could look under it until Quantum of Solace. Since then, he can look 5'10.5" thanks to small lifts and becoming more height conscious. He was shorter than
Jude Law in 2005 and look at him in 2003 with Gwyneth Paltrow in heels:
Click Here We can say she's about 6' or a bit over in heels meaning Daniel definitely does not look a mm over 5'11" in shoes, if that. Daniel in 2002 with 5'8.75" Sam Mendes:
Click Here He didn't look under 5'10" promoting Spectre with Mendes:
Click Here but Daniel's boots probably give him at least a fraction advantage. Daniel began wearing that style of boot a lot and you could easily fit a small lift in that style without a single person noticing.
5'10" flat. Anything over that is simply the Bond growth spurt.
slim 6'1 said on 1/Jan/21
Weak 5’10” 177cm
Sharanya said on 30/Dec/20
Seeing him next to Simon Pegg, especially, he is definitely not under 178cm. Good listing @Rob.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 9/Dec/20
Pretty sure that Daniel was solid 178cm not less.
Nik J Ashton said on 8/Dec/20
This guy is above average!
MaskDeMasque said on 6/Dec/20
5'10. I know bond is 6 foot in the books but in real life a 6'2 spy would stick out a bit. Makes sense making bond average height.
Tall In The Saddle said on 2/Dec/20
I'm not necessarily a fan of Bond movies but I thought Colin Farrell might make a very good 007. I've read he was being touted by Brosnan as an ideal replacement back in early 2000. Apparently Farrell wasn't interested and, curiously, didn't take too kindly to Brosnan's comments, all be they positive.
I watched In Bruges (made in 2008) not so long ago for the first time. IMO, great movie and great cast (including Brendan Gleeson). Just in that movie I thought Farrell displayed perfect traits of efficient, psychopathic disassociation and dark humor that could've easily fit into the character of Bond.
Arch Stanton said on 25/Nov/20
It will be interesting to see who replaces Craig anyway. The people often suggested like Cavill, Hiddleston, and Pattinson always seem too wish washy for the role, Hardy too common and rough. Now a guy like Thom Evans could pull off the Bond look. He probably can't act to save his life though and doesn't seem like the sharpest tool in the toolbox.
Ian C. said on 23/Nov/20
Craig is an excellent illustration of the phenomenon that an actor does not necessarily have to be tall to play a tall character. How tall were most of Paul Newman's characters? well, taller than Newman. How tall were the characters played by Alan Ladd and Humphrey Bogart? Taller than Ladd and Bogart, surely. Even Arnold Schwarzenegger, who really was tall, consistently played characters who were taller than he was.
Tall Sam said on 16/Nov/20
The Craig Bond films seem to be almost self consciously aping the Jason Bourne films with a somewhat more outlandish tone. They always have Bourne being massively disadvantaged while Bond is never one to really fight his own government. Craig makes a somewhat different, relatively short in stature, serious and brutal Bond. He's ok but personally my attention starts to wane by the end of his films, even the better two.
Arch Stanton said on 16/Nov/20
I would say that the Moore Bond films were the most pleasurable to look at, stunning locations and Bond girls. Connery though had the perfect balance between brutal and charm/humour. I've read a lot of the novels and in all honesty I think they're overrated, the films were much better. After Craig I would favour somebody classically tall and dark with a good sense of humour, I miss that from the old films.
Arch Stanton said on 16/Nov/20
I remember that site Craignotbond.com who hated Craig being named Bond and they wanted Clive Owen LOL. I also had my reservations initially. Now Craig could pass for Polish or Russian, he looks more like a KGB thug than British Secret Service, but I think he's been good in the role overall. Casino Royale and Skyfall were very good, but the overall plot and feel of the Craig films isn't my cup of tea, too complex and verbose. I prefer more of an emphasis on location and the Bond girls/charm of Bond.
Ian C. said on 15/Nov/20
I searched out John Cleese' comments about Daniel Craig, and Cleese was way out of line. He called Craig a too-short, bandy-legged Welshman who had obviously never been to Eton. He expressed admiration for Pierce Brosnan as Bond.
Well come on. First of all, Brosnan is Irish, so how is that not an issue if being Welsh is for Craig? Second, Craig is clearly athletic and strong, and is only two inches shorter than Bond as Fleming wrote him. I'm Canadian, but to my ear Craig's BBC English accent is perfect. I actually tried to sit through a DVD of a Brosnan Bond move, but the guy just didn't bring it. He's got black hair and he's tall, and he can speak with a reasonably close imitation of an upper class English accent. That's about the extent of Brosnan's talents as Bond.
One of the ways to gauge if an actor is good or not is to watch him perform with the sound off, or without dialogue. In the opening brawl in the public restroom in Casino Royale, Craig doesn't say anything. When he is trying to drown the double agent in the sink, his expression is ruthless cruelty. Then, after the man is (presumably) dead, Craig-Bond shows just a second's remorse, which he immediately suppresses. Real acting. Real effort given to making the character seem like a real human being.
Ian C. said on 14/Nov/20
I was fourteen, Marco, when Bond mania hit, and I read all the books. In those days they wouldn't let you into the theatre to see the movies unless you were sixteen, so I formed my impressions of how Bond should be from the novels. (Which are well-written. Almost literary.) Craig gets Bond perfectly, except for the usual movie distortions.
First, movie Bond, as Craig played him, doesn't smoke. Bond of the books smokes all the time and takes great pleasure from it.
Second, movie Bond casually seduces women. Bond of the books treats women gallantly, even if he does consider them inferiors, and is actually sexually continent most of the time. If you add up all the nights in his adult life when he sleeps alone, they outnumber the nights he sleeps with a woman by about twenty to one.
Third, Movie Bond is physically indestructible. Bond of the books feels pain, fear, anxiety and depression, and spends a lot of time in hospitals while his wounds mend.
Apparently, John Cleese has claimed that Craig was wrong for Bond because he was too short. Nah. Five foot ten is close enough to tall that Craig was able to overcome it as a handicap.
Marco Ramius said on 12/Nov/20
Craig doesn't look like Bond, and is unable to overcome that handicap with decent acting. Craig's Bond is absolutely not a sophisticated upper class Brit, but with the emotional core of a angry teen. Nothing like Ian Fleming wrote him. I suspect that Craig was trying to compensate for his lack of size with that bodybuilder's physique, which only made him look awkward in the fight scenes.
Who will be the next Bond? Probably somebody better, because almost anyone would be better. The two really good Bonds, Connery and Brosnan, were well cast for the role and it showed. The other four guys were lame in comparison. Especially Daniel Craige.
Ian C. said on 10/Nov/20
Craig doesn't look like Bond, but overcomes that handicap with excellent acting. Craig's Bond is superficially a sophisticated upper class Brit, but with the emotional core of a violent, ruthless thug. Just as Ian Fleming wrote him. I suspect that Craig was trying to compensate for his lack of size with that bodybuilder's physique, which was unnecessary because he was already muscular and athletic enough without the gym to look credible in the fight scenes.
Who will be the next Bond? Probably somebody not as good. The two really good Bonds, Connery and Craig, were just very lucky casting. The other four guys were lame in comparison. Especially Roger Moore.
Dante C. said on 4/Nov/20
Hes around 5'10 1/4 or 5'10 3/8
Slim 6'1" said on 25/Oct/20
He’s shorter than textbook 5’10” Jude law so 5’9.75” downgrade is recommended by me
okbymeman said on 23/Oct/20
The average guess is a joke. Looks a strong 5'10 at the very least next to 5'9 Ben Whishaw.
Ian555 said on 13/Oct/20
Rob do you think Craig would measure taller than Michael Sheen?
Editor Rob
I'd say he had a better chance of edging Michael. Whether it's just over 5ft 10 or 10 flat, Michael could be a 5ft 9.75-10 range guy
Slim 6'1" said on 6/Oct/20
Weak 5’10” look at his feet next to Harrison Ford
Tata said on 25/Sep/20
177cm max. He's got cage fighter proportions. Strong 5'9"
Slim 6'1" said on 25/Sep/20
Not the full 5’10” like Jude law
Imbluz said on 10/Sep/20
If he's 5'10" then Monica Bellucci is only 5'1". When they posed together for publicity stills on Spectre. He stood with his legs apart and she was wearing her 4" heels. He was still about 3 inches taller.
durd1 said on 9/Sep/20
flat 5 10 for sure .
Moezza said on 9/Sep/20
If you watch the kissing scene of Daniel in spectre 007, he seems an inch taller than monica AND monica is 5 7 so it means daniel is 5 8.5 or max 5 9.
Click Here
Sinclair said on 7/Aug/20
This is a difficult one. Sometimes Craig can look well over 5’10” (like in the photo with Ralph Fiennes below), other times Craig barely looks 5’10” (like in the underground train chase scene in Skyfall). I used to think Craig was only 5’8! Today, I’m one of those who would guess a flat 5’10” for Craig, nothing less, maybe more, the 5’10.25” listing also fits. Craig was a shade taller than Paul Newman in Road to Perdition and Newman was probably not much over 5’9” by that time. I also recall Ralph Fiennes looking slightly taller than Craig in Skyfall and Spectre.
Slim 6'1" said on 7/Aug/20
177 weak 5 10 downgrade neccesary, solid 5 10 jude law would edge him out
VitoCheng said on 2/Aug/20
This photo makes Daniel Craig look more like a legal six feet
(because everyone knows Ralph Fiennes is 5'11.25")
Click Here
Alir?za said on 23/Jul/20
He looks me 176-177 cm than full 178 cm
Joseph177 said on 28/Jun/20
Probably 177.5 cm before bed.
Costa said on 26/Jun/20
Hasn’t anyone seen photos of Daniel with his 5’6” wife when they’re not making public appearances. He’s only a couple inches taller than her. He’s no larger than 5’8”. This should be all the evidence one needs:
Click Here
Jkiller said on 24/Jun/20
5'10 is spot on, nothing more nothing less.
QM6'1QM said on 17/Jun/20
viper said on 9/Jun/20
Agreed, viper. 177 cm is a worst case, 178.5 should be highest level!
viper said on 9/Jun/20
He just doesn't look that short.
5-9 range is the shortest he can be, and I'm not so sure on that
Mightyman said on 8/Jun/20
He’s a little over 5’8 seen him up close on the JAMES bond set a few years back and on tomb raider. In really good shape.
Tony Random said on 26/Apr/20
@Arch Stanton - as for "standing out", what also doesn't help, is that this "secret" agent always tells everyone his real name, or at least a name he always uses. You'd expect a secret agent to be a bit more "secretive" and use various names, to hide his identity and thus the fact that he's a secret agent. But back to the point. Totally agree on the other actors standing out too much (most of the other actors were taller than 6' tall, which was Bond's height description in the books) and Daniel Craig looking like he could actually beat someone up.
Rich137 said on 23/Apr/20
Claimed 5.11ft probably about 5.10ft
James G. said on 20/Mar/20
Can’t see him below 5’9 7/8.
Arch Stanton said on 19/Mar/20
With Bond it's more about believability, a guy who is over confident, and a natural with women and you could believe as a larger than life character. But the irony is that Bond is a "Secret" Agent, yet most of the classic tall, dark and handsome actors who've played him would stand out a mile against the average man in any room, the opposite of what a real agent would want. Craig is more realistic than a guy like Brosnan for instance. Statham could pull off Bond in my opinion. A hit with the ladies, very confident and genuinely looks like he could kill you.
Cal Pest said on 16/Mar/20
First 007 who can act, problem is Jimmy Bond does not need a good actor, needs a tuxedo and a martini+ aston martini. Jimmy bond surely shortened Craig's acting range. I thought he was fantastic and destined to great things in "Road to Perdition" - Cause it's all so f##kin hysterical". My guess is 176cm or 180cm on a good heel
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 2/Mar/20
🕵️♂️🎂🎁🎈 Happy Birthday Dan! 🎈🎁🎂🕵️♂️
Have a Very Happy Birthday Daniel Craig - 52 years old today!
Daniel can have a Birthday Guess for 5ft10.25. 😁👍
🕵️♂️🎂🎁🎈🕵️♂️🎂🎁🎈🕵️♂️🎂🎁🎈🕵️♂️🎂🎁🎈
Panchsfhool said on 16/Feb/20
1.76 seems good
David Kashfi said on 13/Feb/20
I think Daniel Craig is just over five nine and half.
viper said on 15/Jan/20
Clive Owen is straight out of central casting for Bond
movieguy12 said on 12/Jan/20
He's been a really good Bond. Didn't think that his blond hair blue eyes look combined with average height was a good fit for Bond. Certainly didn't fit the stereotype of a tall, dark Bond. Its all about the magic of the camera some people just look great on the movie screen.
Ian555 said on 3/Jan/20
Rob do you think for Craig that 5’ 10 1/2” is a better fit since he has been described as both 5’ 10” and 5’ 11” and he has a tendency to look that tall a lot of the time with celebs like Hugh Jackman and other Bond actors?
Editor Rob
I don't think I'd go above a 178cm range, 179 always seemed a stretch too far...even if at times he pulled it off in photos, overall I never gave him it.
TheBat said on 24/Dec/19
Solid 5'10".
Bobby Brown said on 21/Dec/19
This man doesn’t care about his height clearly if he isn’t phased by the fact that his opposite co-star is taller than him, he looked taller by about 2-3 inches than the Italian actress in spectre and she was in a heel so 5’10 is perfect
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Nov/19
Rob, who would measure tallest out of Craig, Swayze and Gabriel Byrne peak?
Editor Rob
Swayze was a guy who was comfortably taller than someone like
Van Damme...out of those three, I do think they are all pretty close, but at times I think probably Swayze has the chance of measuring a bit taller...not 5ft 11, but I'm not convinced just a flat 5ft 10.
viper said on 10/Nov/19
Still surprised he was picked to be Bond, especially If he's only 5-9.
He's been a very good Bond though.
To me Clive Owen just looks straight out of casting for Bond
Costa said on 8/Nov/19
In those photos above, his footwear looks very strange. He’s lucky if he’s 5’9”.
pov said on 21/Oct/19
He’s a lift wearer, he is 5”9 max
Man in Black said on 8/Oct/19
Yeah, 5'10" I'd reckon. Not shy of sticking a cork lift in his shoe either I'd say.
Nik said on 6/Oct/19
He is NOT Mr Average!
Nik said on 1/Sep/19
This guy is taller than most British men!
okbymeman said on 31/Aug/19
Looks 179 at least if Simon Pegg is 175ish.
Matt Shannon said on 22/Aug/19
Hey Rob what range do you think Daniel Craig measures at?
A: 177.5-178
B: 178-178.5
Editor Rob
I would go with 5ft 10 to 10.25 as his range, I'd be surprised if he measured say 9.75 to 10
Yang (5 footer 8, 172-173) said on 18/Aug/19
5ft 9 3/4 can be his lowest or so!!!!!
khaled taban said on 15/Jun/19
5'10" man, no doubt
Matt Shannon said on 29/May/19
Hey Rob I don’t get why people think Daniel is shorter than he his he looks 5’10.25-5’10.5 next to Simon Pegg.
Editor Rob
I don't think he looks 5ff 9.5 or anything like that, but somewhere around 5ft 10
aliD said on 19/May/19
Saw him while promoting 007 in Spain and he is rather short NEVER over 5.9, I am a woman 5.5 and he was very short and very thin, wearing lifts
Peter175 said on 10/May/19
Looks 5’10 or so
Csimpson6ft said on 29/Apr/19
Rob could Daniel be just 5'10 flat today or maybe 5'9.75? He's 50 years old now.
Editor Rob
You can make it to 50 with minimal loss. Unless Craig has had injuries contributing to a fraction, I am not sure he's lost anything noticeable.
HonestSlovene said on 27/Apr/19
He's probably my height (around 178 cm at low and around 180 cm in shoes).
Benjamin Fritz said on 14/Apr/19
@Ben180 Lol, I doubt he'd let a stranger just come up and measure him.
billionaireslayer said on 23/Mar/19
5'9-5'9 n half
Ben180cm said on 26/Feb/19
If I’m 180cm how tall am I plus when I met dan he let me measure him with my measuring tape he was 178cm without shoes
Ian555 said on 28/Jan/19
Rob I remember seeing 6' 2" listing for Craig, which is just ridiculous.
Editor Rob
That would be extremely optimistic. He has managed on some occasions to look near his 5ft 11 claim, but generally somewhere around 5ft 10 looks more believable. It's no surprise that in Bond, for some scenes he may have had the benefit of a shoe lift.
Tom rossi said on 11/Jan/19
I don’t know why everyone’s noise is so far up this guys brownie saying he’s 5,10.5. Ridiculous, he’s 5,9 maybe 5,9.5 . Under 5,10 for sure and people saying he’s 5,11 is just a joke.
David Curtin said on 10/Jan/19
With the 5,103/4 Vigo Mortensen slight advantage over him maybe 5.11 .
Click Here
John wolff said on 4/Jan/19
he’s at best 5,10
Michael 5'10", 178 cm said on 31/Dec/18
He can't be under 5'10" with Harrison Ford. Daniel might've been the shortest James Bond, but he certainly wasn't short either. That's only because the other Bond actors were tall. He looks 5'10" or slightly taller.
Rising - 174 cm said on 21/Nov/18
@Paul: Thanks. That's certainly good to know, but annoying someone would photoshop it. It's funny because I had trouble finding specifics about the pic, but didn't think anything of it. Either way, I think Craig is 5'10", especially with his Quantum' co-star saying that. He could sometimes look a weaker 5'10" before Bond and can now look a bit above it due to good posture, elevator shoes on screen and probably small lifts at times off screen. This is a good(presumably not photoshopped lol) example of how Daniel looks with a 5'8" man:
Click Here And a good example of how he looks with a 5'9" man:
Click Here Sometimes he still doesn't look over 5'10" such as that Skyfall premiere pic above.
Paul NS (6ft 0.5) said on 19/Nov/18
Rising/Anonymous, that Renner photo is a photoshop.
Click Here
Annonymous said on 14/Nov/18
Yikes....looks just 176 CM next to Renner. That's still a solid height where you're 5'10.75 in some good new shoes. With the right build and looks, it's a sexy size.
Ben said on 25/Oct/18
Hi Rob, I've noticed that I've got very similar proportions to Daniel Craig.
Click Here
Editor Rob
Not too dissimilar, though you would edge him out....the one proportion I’d like to match with Craig is bank balance ☺️
JamesGrossman said on 29/Sep/18
Not a chance in hell he’s under 5’10”. He’s probably just at Rob’s listing, perhaps even 5’10.5”.
Batistataker said on 20/Sep/18
5ft 10 (177.8 cm)
Rising - 174 cm said on 18/Aug/18
As for footwear, I believe Daniel is 5'10" just as Gemma Arterton said and has worn lifts as Bond to look closer to the 6' character, but I share your suspicions that he's worn them off screen, though I'd guess smaller lifts and just occasionally. Daniel wears boots a lot and higher cut footwear that could easily hide a lift like this:
Click Here Click Here and these:
Click Here but it's also very difficult to spot in footwear like that unless they're quite big. There does seem to be an angle around the laces on a lot of his dress boots/shoes, but not enough to say for sure from what I've seen. Your best bet is to look at shots when he has lower cut shoes where you can see the ankle like these:
Click Here Click Here I don't know, but I'd be surprised to see Daniel wear Converse-type shoes nowadays like he did back at the '02 Venice Film Festival. He's definitely looked taller from Quantum on compared to pre-Bond or even Casino Royale. You could say he only looked around 177 back then and he now often looks 179, though there are still times when he doesn't look over 5'10" to me such as with solid 5'8" Jeremy Renner:
Click Here
Rising - 174 cm said on 18/Aug/18
@Dominic: Not the best pic, but here's Craig in Converse-type sneakers with Mendes in shoes with thick soles back in '02:
Click Here Nowadays he looks more like 3 cm taller:
Click Here Click Here but that depends on footwear as you can see here with Mendes now in flat sneakers:
Click Here Daniel suddenly looks more like 2" taller but his boots were pretty thick:
Click Here Another poster said that about Jacobi and Craig in the film, though Craig looked noticeably taller at Cannes 20 years ago. I remember there wasn't much of a difference between Jacobi and 5'9" Anthony Hopkins in The Tenth Man(1988)
Dominic said on 14/Aug/18
Anybody find it interesting that when he was stood next to Sam Mendes pre-bond for Road to perdition he was the same height as Mendes. But when he was bond and standing with Mendes suddenly he's gained two inches???? I have always found it interesting looking at his shoes as his foot seems a lot higher than it should be, as shown by the indent on the outside of the shoe line. I think he wears lifts, i think because he has an athletic body he looks taller than his regular 5'9. He was in a film with Derek Jacobi and seems at the same height as Jacobi but at times looks slightly under.
berta said on 28/Jul/18
i think hi bodytype can make him look short. Many believe he is only 175. i remember when his first bond movie came out they described him as only 175 cm in a newspaper. In realty he is 177,5-179 is my guess
PJ said on 26/Jul/18
Mane is 5'8 and a little closer to the camera ... I still think Craig is 5'9 at best:
Click Here
Aaron said on 1/Jul/18
His back doesn’t look fully stretched out. In the morning i’d say a weak 5’11
Bobby said on 30/Jun/18
@Conan, a 1/4 inch isn't 1cm, that's 6mm. Also, with your stats, you may as well say you're 5'10, saying 3/4s sounds really weird.
sadboys said on 27/Jun/18
i think jude law and daniel craig should switch heights on this website
Ben said on 21/Jun/18
Just watched all the Craig Bond movies again and I gotta say he looks a little under 5'10". For example when he's walking amongst a big crowd of people in the London underground he doesn' t look as tall as a 5'10" man would.
But in interviews, photos, and stuff outside of his Bond movies he looks like a legitimate 5'10" man.
Rance said on 11/Jun/18
because of daniels very slim athletic build he can appear taller onscreen than he actually is,
for instance a guy the same height as him but heavier build will appear shortere
i myself put daniel between 5ft 8 n a half to 5ft 9 n a half. i personally dont think he is 5ft 10. maybe he is with chunky heels or elevator shoes but barefoot i would be very surprised if he hit 5ft 10.
cos at 5ft 10 with just 2 inch heels he would be 6ft and he never looks 6ft even when in shoes
Big T said on 1/Jun/18
In the photos with the England rugby guys he is taller than a 5’11” guy and a 6’ guy (who appear to be barefoot) and less than 2 inches under a 6’2” guy (not sure on footwear but likely to be barefoot)
Overall Craig looks a little over 6’ if he was barefoot which of course he isn’t. Did he go into the dressing room with lifts/2 inch or more boots?
Vijayan said on 1/Jun/18
Strong 177 cm guy, nothing more.
MAD SAM said on 25/May/18
I feel he’s a 177 cm guy, perhaps the elevator shoes weren’t just for scenes with Gemma !
xaleox (180.1cm) said on 17/May/18
a Solid 5'10", don't think he is any shorter than that I'll say.
diavolo said on 29/Apr/18
In certain scenes of Quantum of Solace, he looked almost 4 inches taller than 5'8" Olga Kurylenko when she was barefoot. Thanks to clever camera angles and clever shoes, I guess.
haxxx said on 25/Apr/18
Very accurate. He can sometimes look 5'11 with shoes. I would say he could possibly be 5'10.75 out of bed, what do you think Rob?
Editor Rob
It wouldn't be a big surprise if he woke up at near 5ft 11
Paleman said on 10/Apr/18
Looks like a spot on 5'10" guy, he certainly doesn't stand at only 5'9" or 5'8" as some are claiming... I don't think he looks as tall as 5'11" - the current listing seems like a good shout. Could be flat 5'10" just as well.
QM6'1QM said on 4/Apr/18
Absolutely, he is 5'10 male. He looks like this with his stocky physique and round head.
178 cm at low level at the end of the day.
177.5 cm at the lowest level after a hard day of filming.
Chase said on 26/Mar/18
The quarter inch is pretty unnecessary
Conan said on 23/Mar/18
I'm 5 ft 9 3/4 in (177 cm) on barefoot, so I guess Daniel Craig's height is 5 ft 10 in (178 cm). He is taller than me about 1/4 in (1 cm)
Terry said on 21/Mar/18
A very weak 5'10.
Erik9012 said on 24/Feb/18
I've always thought he looked like a strong 5'9 barefoot. In the beach scenes in CR his body frame bore a striking resemblance to that of my dad and grandfather who were 177 cm when they enlisted in the national service. Back in the day I used to have an issue with my height so I paid much attention to this :)
Darius said on 12/Feb/18
Looks 5'10" flat next to Hugh Jackman. I think its best to take that 1/4" off his listed height.
Z186 said on 7/Feb/18
Click Here ... he doesn't look that small compared to some of the England rugby lads
Quoter_987 said on 18/Jan/18
Gemma Arterton is 5'7 and as Rob knows, stilettos add more like 3" of height unless it has a platform. Considering Daniel would have been 5'11.5" in dress shoes, I refuse to believe she was taller than him as she claims in the heels. She was probably half an inch shorter or something, and so Hollywood still wanted him to be noticeably taller, and she is just lacking in spatial awareness so thinks she's taller when she was still slightly shorter than him.
Spot on listing.
popo said on 10/Jan/18
5 ft 10 inch flat this listing is his MAX height .......btw just wanted tell yall I feel blessed hitting 5 ft 11 inches flat dont have to Lie anymore :)
HonestSlovene said on 10/Jan/18
I'd say 5'10" flat is nearer.
Anonymous said on 9/Jan/18
175 cm evening
178 cm morning
176.5 cm at day
Bobby said on 8/Jan/18
Can we give him 5'10.5? He looks 180cm a lot of the time.
andre said on 6/Jan/18
Lool 176 cm in the night barefoot and 179cm with shoes in the morning
what is wrong with you rob he is listed 178cm and that is with shoes
Psychedelic Earth 187 said on 6/Jan/18
Hanks edged him by quite a bit in road to perdition. A 177 downgrade is necessary. And he struggled to edge out a very aged Paul Newman.
Rick said on 3/Jan/18
I think he's a fraction under 5'10, not over.
MaskDeMasque said on 29/Dec/17
Rob, what makes you think he's 5'10.25 instead of 5'10 flat? I think a legit 5'10.25 like Seth Macfarlane would edge him out.
eric said on 23/Dec/17
looks more like 5-9
Anonymous said on 9/Dec/17
but really he is 5'9"
Slim 186 said on 8/Dec/17
The Shredder said on 5/Dec/17
Unless this guy always wears lifts , I'd say he actually is 5'11 ish.
*************
He’s wearing elevators next to Harrison in the photo above and even wore them onset James Bond to look 5’11”-6’.
The Shredder said on 5/Dec/17
Unless this guy always wears lifts , I'd say he actually is 5'11 ish.
Anonymous said on 27/Nov/17
175 centimeters
Slim 185 said on 18/Nov/17
177/178, just average height in the West.
Scoobydoo said on 4/Nov/17
178 cm barefoot
180 cm with sneakers/ shoes
Anonymous said on 29/Oct/17
People who are saying he's 5'8 is ridiculous a say 5'10 at best
Anonymous said on 22/Oct/17
5'9" + 1,5 inch lifts in
Chelsea Boots, That's why everyone is cheated with he has 5'10".
177cm said on 22/Oct/17
@Rance. This guy is 5'8? Pictures with him and ford show a 1 or 2 cm difference at most accounting for their stances. But 3 inches? Look at the picture above and say that's a 3 inch difference. Look at him and 5'9 wishaw, easy inch on him. Him next to 5'8.75 pegg. Can look nearly 2 inches taller. What have you seen to suggest he's 5'8? I find that ridiculous
Jimbo said on 18/Oct/17
lol... You can't lose 3cm of height in one day.. unless you have poor posture. Harrison Ford still edges him out and he is listed at 5 ft 11.
5 ft 10 178 CM in the morning at night 177.5 CM or on a bad day 177cm bottom.
Anonymous said on 16/Oct/17
5'9" period.
Rance said on 16/Oct/17
If your going to believe he's 5ft 10 then you just aswell put him at 6ft 2,he is BELOW average height for the UK.
Rance said on 16/Oct/17
Daniel is 5ft 9 in shoes, and so about 5ft 8in bare foot, and he is NOT 5ft 10 and certainly NOT ABOVE, there are so many actors at 5ft 8 yet are stated as 10 or 11,its just getting stupid, 5,9 is average height for male in UK and craig is fractionally below it.
Anonymous said on 15/Oct/17
He measures 175/6cm (evening/night)178cm (morning) most likely.
177cm said on 15/Oct/17
Anything suggesting this guy is sub 5'10 is ridiculous. Easily holds his own against 5'11ish ford and Fiennes. 1 inch difference between him and strong 5'11 bardem. Over an inch difference between him and closed book 5'9 ben whishaw. Can look 179cm at times. Guy just gets downgraded because people are biast against him for being the shortest bond.
Anonymous said on 14/Oct/17
definitely strong 5'9" but for sure 5'10 max on the morning, let's say 5'9.5 man at day will be the best claim.
Slim 6' said on 13/Oct/17
Honestly 177 cm area is right on the money. The highest I'd list him at his 177.8/5'10".
I think a quarter inch downgrade is golden then we can close the page.
Headman said on 12/Oct/17
Small head on Daniel, right? 8.5-8.75 in length I would guess. What would you say Rob?
Jimbo said on 10/Oct/17
178 morning 177.5 night
Anonymous said on 10/Oct/17
175,5 / 177,5 range
Rising - 174 cm said on 9/Oct/17
@Slim: In the 2nd pic, yeah, but Daniel looks 5'10" to me in the 1st pic.
Btw, I did think Daniel looked no more than 2" taller than Berenice Marlohe in the shower scene in Skyfall and Rob lists her at an even 5'8
, though she was apparently listed 172 cm so who knows? Though I have little doubt Daniel is just about 5'10" either way.
Dreampuffe(5'9.5") said on 6/Oct/17
Nothing under 5’10”.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 5/Oct/17
If he's shorter than Kenan Thompson like some people think, then how does he manage to at least match him while nearly sitting down (while having a slight camera disadvantage, in the same footwear):
Click Here
Click Here (he edges him in this angle, with the same posture that he was standing in in the first photo)
I'm not saying that he towers over him, but I do see at least 4-5 CM between them (and Kenan seems 174 CM to me). This listing is fine, with anything under 5'10" being ridiculous.
Editor Rob
in most of that sketch, I think he was acting very loose, limp in the knees...
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 5/Oct/17
If he's shorter than Kenan Thompson like some people think, then how does he manage to at least match him while nearly sitting down (while having a slight camera disadvantage, in the same footwear):
Click Here
Click Here (he edges him in this angle, with the same posture that he was standing in in the first photo)
I'm not saying that he towers over him, but I do see at least 4-5 CM between them (and Kenan seems 174 CM to me). This listing is fine, with anything under 5'10" being ridiculous.
Slim said on 3/Oct/17
Rob, where do you think Daniel would stadiometre in the 80's and 90's?:=
A: 175
B: 176
C: 177
D: 178