Audrey Tautou's Height
5ft 3 (160 cm)
French actress best known for roles in films Amelie, The Da Vinci Code, A Very Long Engagement and Dirty Pretty Things. In Studio Magazine 2006 it mentioned: "Avec mon Metre Soixante, et mes quarant kilos", or 160cm.
Photo by PR Photos
Photo by PR Photos
Add a Comment39 comments
Average Guess (9 Votes)
5ft 2.86in (159.7cm)
5ft 2.86in (159.7cm)
Futy Adore said on 1/Oct/21
I'd put her 1 cm smaller.She seem so pettit.I bet she's 1,59cm(5,2,75")
I'd put her 1 cm smaller.She seem so pettit.I bet she's 1,59cm(5,2,75")
Heightwise said on 25/Dec/19
She's probably 5'-5'1". 5'3" women are rarely called tiny. I've always seen her as petite, including in Amelie. She has a small, round face, fine features, and a delicate build. She looks so impish and elfin. She seems pretentiously French and upscale. I've always been unsure of her, especially because her breakout film was so pretentiously indie and French. Time to downgrade!
She's probably 5'-5'1". 5'3" women are rarely called tiny. I've always seen her as petite, including in Amelie. She has a small, round face, fine features, and a delicate build. She looks so impish and elfin. She seems pretentiously French and upscale. I've always been unsure of her, especially because her breakout film was so pretentiously indie and French. Time to downgrade!
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 27/Mar/19
Audrey was amazing in 'The Da Vinci Code'. I knew she was pretty, but she is wholly beautiful! Next to Tom Hanks, she looked tiny, and yes, 5ft3 or thereabouts is what I was expecting for her.
5ft3 it is.
Audrey was amazing in 'The Da Vinci Code'. I knew she was pretty, but she is wholly beautiful! Next to Tom Hanks, she looked tiny, and yes, 5ft3 or thereabouts is what I was expecting for her.
5ft3 it is.
MAD SAM said on 22/May/18
159 cm seems fit
159 cm seems fit
Pierric said on 5/Dec/15
Rob, we write an "e" at the end of the word "quarantE" :-)
Editor Rob
Rob, we write an "e" at the end of the word "quarantE" :-)
Editor Rob someone mentioned it in 2013, but I left it as one of a small number of trap/track phrases.
Similar to trap heights.
Similar to trap heights.
Sam said on 8/Jan/15
I didn't care for Da Vinci Code but liked Dirty Pretty Things and Amelie...she is both cute and beautiful, she has a gorgeous body as well. Accurate listing IMO.
I didn't care for Da Vinci Code but liked Dirty Pretty Things and Amelie...she is both cute and beautiful, she has a gorgeous body as well. Accurate listing IMO.
Arch Stanton said on 18/Oct/14
Does look 5'3 range in The Da Vinci Code though next to Hanks.
Does look 5'3 range in The Da Vinci Code though next to Hanks.
Arch Stanton said on 18/Oct/14
Love her too!! Gave more a 5'2" range impression in Amelie.
Love her too!! Gave more a 5'2" range impression in Amelie.
Logan Hedlund said on 21/May/13
Rob: could you please correct in French "Avec mon mètre soixante, et mes quarante kilos"?
Rob: could you please correct in French "Avec mon mètre soixante, et mes quarante kilos"?
mina said on 19/May/13
Love,love her! Hard to believe she is 5'3.I'd have guessed 5'5.
Love,love her! Hard to believe she is 5'3.I'd have guessed 5'5.
John said on 26/Jul/12
I think 5'3" seems correct. In the The Da Vinci Code with 6' 0" Tom Hanks and about 3inch heels she does indeed give impression of 5'3". Very elegant actress with beautiful French accent.
I think 5'3" seems correct. In the The Da Vinci Code with 6' 0" Tom Hanks and about 3inch heels she does indeed give impression of 5'3". Very elegant actress with beautiful French accent.
Em said on 30/Dec/11
She looks taller because she's so skinny.
She looks taller because she's so skinny.
Shaun said on 26/Apr/11
Audrina Partridge I was thinking of, LOL.
Audrina Partridge I was thinking of, LOL.
Shaun said on 26/Apr/11
Oh sorry I thought this was Audrey from the Hills.
Oh sorry I thought this was Audrey from the Hills.
Shaun said on 26/Apr/11
Attractive yes, but there is something about her I don't like. I dunno, I perceive she's high maintenance or a spoiled brat or something.. I would have estimated 5'4"
Attractive yes, but there is something about her I don't like. I dunno, I perceive she's high maintenance or a spoiled brat or something.. I would have estimated 5'4"
Anonymous said on 15/Dec/10
i think she's 5"4
i think she's 5"4
guyfrommars said on 10/May/09
5ft8 Kassovits looked tall next to her in Amelie. She was wearing average boots without heels in that film.
5ft8 Kassovits looked tall next to her in Amelie. She was wearing average boots without heels in that film.
Bunny said on 13/Feb/09
Oh I thought she was like 5"5 or 5"6
Oh I thought she was like 5"5 or 5"6
Anonymous said on 3/Dec/08
I would say she is shorter than stated. If she was 160 cm., with high heels she will look like an average-tall girl, about 1.70, and she never ever looks like that.
I would say she is shorter than stated. If she was 160 cm., with high heels she will look like an average-tall girl, about 1.70, and she never ever looks like that.
Corinne said on 5/Nov/08
Wow i agree, on seeing Amelie i was under the impression that she was tall. She must just be thin and maybe have a smallish head. Same height as me! Yay all my favourite actresses are around my height, this site makes me happy to be small :D
Wow i agree, on seeing Amelie i was under the impression that she was tall. She must just be thin and maybe have a smallish head. Same height as me! Yay all my favourite actresses are around my height, this site makes me happy to be small :D
betykk said on 25/Jul/08
I very like film Amelie and I was surprised when I read Audrey is only 160 cm. In this film she looks more, more taller.
I very like film Amelie and I was surprised when I read Audrey is only 160 cm. In this film she looks more, more taller.
meg said on 11/May/08
tiny girl. this is most evident in group photos i reckon.
tiny girl. this is most evident in group photos i reckon.
Tessa said on 21/Apr/08
i agree with most of the comments here...gorgeous girl, but she looks more like 5'2''
i agree with most of the comments here...gorgeous girl, but she looks more like 5'2''
Edwin said on 17/Feb/08
5'2.5 is probably right. Some people have said she has the figure of a 12-year-old boy but I actually think that's she's hott and her height makes her look all the more feminine.
5'2.5 is probably right. Some people have said she has the figure of a 12-year-old boy but I actually think that's she's hott and her height makes her look all the more feminine.
Achilles said on 17/Jan/08
Tom Hanks is around 6' give or take, and he towers over her in Davinci code..
i dunno fi she has heels on, but either , audrey toujour tres belle!!
Tom Hanks is around 6' give or take, and he towers over her in Davinci code..
i dunno fi she has heels on, but either , audrey toujour tres belle!!
bam said on 17/Nov/07
She is lovely, but in the interest of accuracy, rob i would consider downgrading her slightly. A 5'3 commonly being called tiny is like calling a 5'8-5'9 man tiny. What do you think rob?
She is lovely, but in the interest of accuracy, rob i would consider downgrading her slightly. A 5'3 commonly being called tiny is like calling a 5'8-5'9 man tiny. What do you think rob?
Roo said on 24/Aug/07
1.6m is around 5'2.5. For once somebody who is honest about their height hooray!! :oD
1.6m is around 5'2.5. For once somebody who is honest about their height hooray!! :oD
Xan said on 20/Jun/07
So glad to see this! My little bro and I were watching an Audrey Tatou movie last night and I asked him if I was about her height (I'm 5'3, though I think now I'm closer to 5'4) and my brother told me she was MUCH taller than me. Ha!
So glad to see this! My little bro and I were watching an Audrey Tatou movie last night and I asked him if I was about her height (I'm 5'3, though I think now I'm closer to 5'4) and my brother told me she was MUCH taller than me. Ha!
Maria Ana said on 30/Jan/07
40 kilos for 1.60m is not necessarily skinny! i am 1.70m and 47.5 kilos, and i am slim, not skinny! i just have very light bones!
40 kilos for 1.60m is not necessarily skinny! i am 1.70m and 47.5 kilos, and i am slim, not skinny! i just have very light bones!
dmeyer said on 30/Oct/06
she could be less sice even in 3 inches heels she make hanks look 195 cm
she could be less sice even in 3 inches heels she make hanks look 195 cm
Megan said on 1/Oct/06
if a lot of people call her tiny, then she is most likely under 5'3". since 5'4" is average height, someone who is 1" under that wouldn't always be talked about their height and how tiny they r. i would say she is around 5'1".
if a lot of people call her tiny, then she is most likely under 5'3". since 5'4" is average height, someone who is 1" under that wouldn't always be talked about their height and how tiny they r. i would say she is around 5'1".
Maria said on 16/Jun/06
I think she might be well under 5 foot 3, possibly between 5 foot and 5 foot 2. And yeah, she is really skinny. I'd think that if they called her tiny in the magazine where she is the cover model, I would say she is well under 5 foot 3 because that is average height, so Im saying smaller than that.
I think she might be well under 5 foot 3, possibly between 5 foot and 5 foot 2. And yeah, she is really skinny. I'd think that if they called her tiny in the magazine where she is the cover model, I would say she is well under 5 foot 3 because that is average height, so Im saying smaller than that.
Tia said on 10/Jun/06
in her photos of TDVC, Audrey does not look 5'3, but instead a little shorter. In the movie, she wore high-heals (though not overly high)...but her height through out the movie was not consistent. In the scene toward the end, upon makin the discovery of Sang-Real and her grandmother...as she bids Robert farewell, the film shot was inconsistant. When the camera focuses on Hanks, Audrey appeared to be reach above his shoulder...but when it was the other way round, she was well below Hank's shoulder. I think you may want to reconsider this height...
in her photos of TDVC, Audrey does not look 5'3, but instead a little shorter. In the movie, she wore high-heals (though not overly high)...but her height through out the movie was not consistent. In the scene toward the end, upon makin the discovery of Sang-Real and her grandmother...as she bids Robert farewell, the film shot was inconsistant. When the camera focuses on Hanks, Audrey appeared to be reach above his shoulder...but when it was the other way round, she was well below Hank's shoulder. I think you may want to reconsider this height...
crewmember said on 7/Jun/06
quarant kilos=40 kilos=88lbs? that is SKINNY!
audrey looks a lot taller because she is so thin and has very long/lean legs. if you notice her legs are like twigs. i am 5'3 but i don't give the illusion of being as tall because i have shorter legs and am heavier. it's true that thinner you are, the taller you seem.
quarant kilos=40 kilos=88lbs? that is SKINNY!
audrey looks a lot taller because she is so thin and has very long/lean legs. if you notice her legs are like twigs. i am 5'3 but i don't give the illusion of being as tall because i have shorter legs and am heavier. it's true that thinner you are, the taller you seem.
ForensicNYC said on 18/May/06
The official release photo of THE DA VINCI CODE shows Audrey about 5'3" beside 6'0" Tom Hanks.
Click Here
Other shots have the same height differences.
Click Here
Same height in action shots...
Click Here
The official release photo of THE DA VINCI CODE shows Audrey about 5'3" beside 6'0" Tom Hanks.
Click Here
Other shots have the same height differences.
Click Here
Same height in action shots...
Click Here
Allison said on 14/Apr/06
She seems about 8 inches shorter (in heels) than Tom Hanks in promotional photos for The da Vinci Code.
She seems about 8 inches shorter (in heels) than Tom Hanks in promotional photos for The da Vinci Code.
CelebHeights Editor said on 8/Feb/06
Studio Magazine, 2006:
"Avec mon Metre Soixante, et mes quarant kilos"
In other words, She says her height and weight: "with my height of 1m 60"
Studio Magazine, 2006:
"Avec mon Metre Soixante, et mes quarant kilos"
In other words, She says her height and weight: "with my height of 1m 60"
Anonymous said on 30/Dec/05
she's probably between 5'1"-5'2"
she's probably between 5'1"-5'2"
Cliff said on 29/Dec/05
Interesing write-up on my favorite living French Actress in the new issue of Newsweek (Jan 3, 2006). The photo on the cover features her standing next to Hanks (6ft) and Tautou is wearing huge 4 inch heels which brings her very slightly above his shoulder. The article inside quotes one of the producers of "Da vincci code" as saying that: "she is impossibly small, you can almost fit her in the palm of your hand." It was again stressed later in the article that she definitely wasn't tall. With all of the emphasis placed on her size, she may indeed be closer to the 152-155cm mark instead of the 157cm I stated previously. She has as many references in articles on her regarding her size as Kylie Minogue does, which likely means you're well below average.
Interesing write-up on my favorite living French Actress in the new issue of Newsweek (Jan 3, 2006). The photo on the cover features her standing next to Hanks (6ft) and Tautou is wearing huge 4 inch heels which brings her very slightly above his shoulder. The article inside quotes one of the producers of "Da vincci code" as saying that: "she is impossibly small, you can almost fit her in the palm of your hand." It was again stressed later in the article that she definitely wasn't tall. With all of the emphasis placed on her size, she may indeed be closer to the 152-155cm mark instead of the 157cm I stated previously. She has as many references in articles on her regarding her size as Kylie Minogue does, which likely means you're well below average.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.